Persistent lipid abnormalities in statin-treated coronary artery disease patients with and without diabetes in China

How safe are proprotein convertase subtilisinekexin type 9 inhibitors in diabetes?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the safety of proprotein convertase subtilisinekexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in patients with diabetes, specifically focusing on their impact on glucose metabolism.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with diabetes often require intensified lipid-lowering therapy. PCSK9 inhibitors can reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations by approximately 60%, and significantly reduce cardiovascular risk when added to statin therapy. Some studies have suggested an association between low LDL-C levels and an increased risk of new-onset diabetes, and genetics has almost consistently shown an increased glucose concentration and risk of diabetes. Most clinical trials have not demonstrated a deterioration in glycaemic control in patients with diabetes after the use of PCSK9 inhibitors, and they do not lead to other significant treatment-emergent adverse events.

SUMMARY

Although the majority of patients with diabetes are undergoing background statin therapy, which may mask potential adverse effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on glycaemic control, current data suggest that the benefits outweigh the risks for diabetic patients using PCSK9 inhibitors. Considering the different nature of genetic studies and of clinical trials, close monitoring of glucose parameters is necessary, especially in individuals with prediabetes.

Efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Individuals with diabetes have increased cardiovascular risk. Although PCSK9 inhibitors bring about a wide reduction in lipids, there is uncertainty about the effects for diabetic patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors for diabetes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We performed a meta-analysis comparing treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors versus controls up to July 2022. Primary efficacy endpoints were percentage changes in lipid profile parameters. We used random effects meta-analyses to combine data. Subgroups of diabetic patients (by diabetes type, baseline LDL-C, baseline HbA1c and follow-up time) were also compared. We included 12 RCTs comprising 14,702 patients. Mean reductions in LDL-C were 48.20% (95% CI: 35.23%, 61.17%) in patients with diabetes. Reductions observed with PCSK9 inhibitors were 45.23% (95% CI: 39.43%, 51.02%) for non-HDL-cholesterol, 30.39% (95% CI: 24.61%, 36.17%) for total cholesterol, 11.96% (95% CI: 6.73%, 17.19%) for triglycerides, 27.87% (95% CI: 22.500%, 33.17%) for lipoprotein(a), 42.43% (95% CI: 36.81%, 48.06%) for apolipoprotein B; increases in HDL-C of 5.97% (95% CI: 4.59%, 7.35%) were also observed. There was no significant difference in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (WMD: 2.02 mg/mL; 95% CI: -1.83, 5.87) and HbA1c (WMD: 1.82%; 95% CI: -0.63, 4.27). Use of a PCSK9 inhibitor was not associated with increased risk of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) (p = 0.542), serious adverse event (SAE) (p = 0.529) and discontinuations due to AEs (p = 0.897).

CONCLUSIONS

PCSK9 inhibitor therapy should be considered for all diabetic individuals at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

REGISTRATION CODE IN PROSPERO

CRD42022339785.

The Inhibition of Evolocumab on Non-Infarct-Related Artery Disease in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Purpose

The effects of combing evolocumab and statin on the clinical outcome and physiological function of coronary arteries in STEMI patients with non-infarct-related artery (NIRA) disease are still unclear.

Methods

A total of 355 STEMI patients with NIRA were enrolled in this study, who underwent combined quantitative flow ratio (QFR) at baseline and after 12 months of treatment with statin monotherapy or statin plus evolocumab.

Results

Diameter stenosis and lesion length were significantly lower in the group undergoing statin plus evolocumab. While the group exhibited significantly higher minimum lumen diameter (MLD), and QFR values. Statin plus evolocumab (OR = 0.350; 95% CI: 0.149-0.824; P = 0.016) and plaque lesion length (OR = 1.223; 95% CI: 1.102-1.457; P = 0.033) were independently associated with rehospitalization for unstable angina (UA) within 12 months.

Conclusion

Evolocumab combined with statin therapy can significantly improve the anatomical and physiological function of the coronary arteries and downregulate the re-hospitalization rate due to UA in STEMI patients with NIRA.

The Effect of Untraditional Lipid Parameters in the Development of Coronary Artery Disease: Atherogenic Index of Plasma, Atherogenic Coefficient and Lipoprotein Combined Index

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the usability of atherogenic indices of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) due to coronary artery disease and patients without CAD as risk factors and markers for cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

The data of 150 patients who underwent CABG, and 155 patients who underwent coronary angiography and was not diagnosed with CAD were analysed retrospectively. Demographic data and plasma lipid values were collected. The relationship between these ratios and CVD was investigated via univariate logistic regression analysis performed by creating atherogenic indices.

RESULTS

The data of 125 patients who underwent CABG between May 2018 and May 2020 (90 males, 35 females; mean age 64,94 ± 9,61), and 155 patients who had coronary angiography between the same dates and found to have no CAD (64 males, 91 females; mean age 60,12 ± 11,6) were analysed retrospectively. The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), atherogenic coefficient (AC) and lipoprotein combined index (LCI) ratios were found to be significantly higher in the CABG group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). CABG applied patients were divided into three groups according to their SYNTAX Score-I values. There was no statistical difference in the AIP (p = 0.434), AC (p = 0.715) and LCI (p = 0.891) ratios between the groups. In the ROC analysis of the CABG group, it was found that the AC value was the highest in terms of sensitivity with a value of 74.4% (AUC = 0.669, p < 0.001), and the LCI was the highest in terms of specificity with a value of 65.8% (AUC = 0.634, p < 0.001). In the univariate logistic regression analysis created, it was seen that all three indices had a significant effect in the CABG group (AIP; OR 0.493 p = 0,002, AC; OR 0.298 p < 0,001, LCI; OR 0.358 p = 0,001).

CONCLUSION

The use of atherogenic indices in daily practice can be recommended in the process of monitoring the risk of CVD in CAD patients, along with determining those patients' lipid profiles.

Randomized study of evolocumab in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia on background statin: Pre-specified analysis of the Chinese population from the BERSON clinical trial

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evolocumab with background atorvastatin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hyperlipidaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a pre-specified analysis of patients in the BERSON study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02662569) in China. Patients initiated background atorvastatin 20 mg/d, after which they were randomized 2:2:1:1 to evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or 420 mg monthly (QM) or to placebo Q2W or QM. Co-primary endpoints were percentage change in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to week 12 and from baseline to the mean of weeks 10 and 12. Additional endpoints included atherogenic lipids, glycaemic measures and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Among 453 patients randomized in China, 451 received at least one dose of study drug (evolocumab or placebo). Evolocumab significantly reduced LDL-C compared with placebo at week 12 (Q2W, -85.0%; QM, -74.8%) and at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 (Q2W, -80.4%; QM, -81.0%) (adjusted P < 0.0001 for all) when administered with background atorvastatin. Non-HDL-C, ApoB100, total cholesterol, Lp(a), triglycerides, HDL-C and VLDL-C significantly improved with evolocumab vs placebo. No new safety findings were observed with evolocumab. The incidence of diabetes AEs was higher with evolocumab compared with placebo. There were no differences over time between evolocumab and placebo in measures of glycaemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients in China with T2DM and hyperlipidaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia receiving background atorvastatin, evolocumab significantly reduced LDL-C and other atherogenic lipids, was well tolerated, and had no notable impact on glycaemic measures.

The Associations between Apolipoprotein E Gene Epsilon2/Epsilon3/Epsilon4 Polymorphisms and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background and Objective: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) plays important roles in lipoprotein metabolism and cardiovascular disease. Evidence suggests the APOE gene epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 (ε2/ε3/ε4) polymorphisms might be associated with the susceptibility of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, no clear consensus has yet been established. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis is to provide a precise conclusion on the potential association between APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphisms and the risk of CAD in patients with T2DM based on case-control studies. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases were searched for all relevant studies prior to August 2017 in English and Chinese language. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the relationships. The between-study heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochran's Q-test and the I2 index to adopt fixed- or random- effect models. Results: A total of 13 studies were eligible for inclusion. There was evidence for significant associations between APOE ε4 mutation and the risk of CAD in patients with T2DM (for ε3/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3: OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.38-2.08, P < 0.001; for ε4/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3: OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.61-4.60, P < 0.001; for ε4/ε4+ε3/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3: OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.52-2.22, P < 0.001; for ε4 allele vs. ε3 allele: OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.40-1.94, P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant associations were found in genetic model of APOE ε2 mutation (for ε2/ε2 vs. ε3/ε3: OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 0.90-3.09, P = 0.104; for ε2/ε3 vs. ε3/ε3: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.93-1.51, P = 0.175; for ε2/ε2+ε2/ε3 vs. ε3/ε3: OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.88-1.82, P = 0.212; for ε2 allele vs. ε3 allele: OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.98-1.84, P = 0.07). Conclusions: The APOE gene ε4 mutation is associated with an increased risk of CAD in patients with T2DM, while the ε2 variation has null association with this disease.

Atherogenic dyslipidemia and risk of silent coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study

Background

To investigate whether atherogenic dyslipidemia, a dyslipidemic profile combining elevated triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, is predictive of risk of silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) or angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Cohort study in 1080 asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes with a normal resting electrocardiogram, at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol <3.35 mmol/L. Patients initially underwent screening for SMI by stress myocardial scintigraphy. Patients with SMI underwent coronary angiography.

Results

Overall, 60 (5.5 %) patients had atherogenic dyslipidemia (triglycerides ≥2.26 mmol/L and HDL cholesterol ≤0.88 mmol/L). In multivariate analyses taking into account the parameters associated in univariate analyses with SMI and then CAD, atherogenic dyslipidemia was associated with SMI (odds ratio 1.8[1.0–3.3]), as were male gender (OR 2.1[1.5–2.9]), BMI (OR 0.97[0.94–0.997]), retinopathy (OR 1.4[1.1–1.9]), peripheral occlusive arterial disease (POAD: OR 2.5[1.6–3.8]) and mean blood pressure (OR 1.01[1.00–1.03]); atherogenic dyslipidemia was associated with CAD (OR 4.0[1.7–9.2]), as were male gender (OR 3.0[1.6–5.6]), BMI (OR 0.94[0.90–0.995]), retinopathy (OR 1.7[1.0–2.9], POAD (OR 4.0[2.1–7.4]) and mean blood pressure (OR 1.03[1.01–1.05]). In the subgroup of 584 patients with LDL cholesterol <2.6 mmol/L, atherogenic dyslipidemia was also associated with CAD (OR 3.6[1.5–9.0]).

Conclusions

Atherogenic dyslipidemia was associated with an increased risk of SMI and silent CAD in patients with type 2 diabetes and LDL cholesterol levels <3.35 mmol/L. Specific management of atherogenic dyslipidemia might help reducing the high residual burden of cardiovascular disease.