Prediction of atrial fibrillation in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with catheter ablation or not. Classical scores are not useful

Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and its association with long-term outcome

Background

Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. We sought to investigate the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with electrophysiologically confirmed/ablated AVNRT and its association with transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke as well as mortality during long-term follow-up.

Methods

From the Karolinska Ablation Registry, 2855 consecutive patients with a first-time ablation for AVNRT between 2005 and 2018 were analyzed.

Results

Patients were 52.1 ± 15.9 years old and 59.3% were women. During follow-up of up to 10 years (median 6.0 years; interquartile range 3.3 to 9.2 years), new onset or recurrence of atrial fibrillation occurred in 317 (11.1%) patients (incidence rate 19 cases per 1000 person-years). Excluding those with history of atrial fibrillation, new onset of atrial fibrillation occurred in 153 (6.1%) patients. In multivariable analysis, history of atrial fibrillation, arterial hypertension, history of TIA/stroke, and heart failure remained independently associated with new onset or recurrence of atrial fibrillation during follow-up. Death of any cause and TIA/stroke occurred in 141 (4.9%) patients and 107 (3.7%) patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, occurrence of atrial fibrillation during follow-up remained independently associated with both outcomes. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation according to age at the end of follow-up was high among young patients (<60 years of age: 12.7%; 60-69 years of age: 10.6%).

Conclusion

In this large cohort of patients with diagnosed AVNRT, the incidence of atrial fibrillation was high (11.1%) during long-term follow-up. Occurrence of atrial fibrillation during follow-up remained independently associated with death for any cause as well as with TIA/stroke. Therefore, a closer monitoring for atrial fibrillation in patients with AVNRT including those at young age is advisable.

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients ≤30 Years of Age

Pulmonary vein (PV) automaticity is an established trigger for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), making PV isolation (PVI) the cornerstone of catheter ablation. However, data on triggers for atrial fibrillation (AF) and catheter ablation strategy in very young patients aged <30 years are sparse. A total of 51 young patients (mean age 24.0 ± 4.2 years, 78.4% men) with drug-refractory PAF underwent electrophysiology (EP) study and ablation at 5 EP centers. None of the patients had structural heart disease or family history of AF. EP study induced supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 12 patients (n = 12, 23.5%): concealed accessory pathway mediated orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in 3 patients, typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in 6 patients, left superior PV tachycardia in 1 patient, left atrial appendage tachycardia in 1 patient, and typical atrial flutter in 1 patient. In patients with induced SVTs, SVT ablation without PVI was performed as an index procedure, except for the patient with atrial flutter who received cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in addition to PVI. Remaining patients underwent radiofrequency (n = 15, 29.4%) or second-generation cryoballoon-based PVI (n = 24, 47%). There were no major complications related to ablation procedures. Follow-up was based on outpatient visits including 24-hour Holter-electrocardiogram at 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation, or additional Holter-electrocardiogram was ordered in case of symptoms suggesting recurrence. Recurrence was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) episode >30 seconds after a 3-month blanking period. A total of 2 patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, 1 with left atrial appendage tachycardia, experienced AF recurrence within the first 3 months and received PVI. After the 3-month blanking period, during a median follow-up of 17.0 ± 10.1 months, 44 of 51 patients (86.2%) were free of ATA recurrence. In the PVI group, 33 of 39 patients (84.6%) experienced no ATA recurrence. In conclusion, SVT substrate is identified in around a quarter of young adult patients with history of AF, and targeted ablation without PVI may be sufficient in the majority of these patients. PVI is needed in the majority and is safe and effective in this population.

The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.

Symptomatic arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT): results from the German Ablation Registry

BACKGROUND

In atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), catheter ablation is considered as first-line therapy. Despite high success rates, some patients present with arrhythmia recurrence or develop other types of arrhythmias over time.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence of symptomatic arrhythmias after initially successful AVNRT ablation and to analyze their clinical implications in a real-world cohort.

METHODS

We included 2,795 patients from the German Ablation Registry undergoing first ablation of AVNRT between 01/2007 and 01/2010. In patients alive at long-term follow-up, patient-specific characteristics and long-term follow-up data were compared between patients with (group A) and without (group B) any symptomatic arrhythmia during follow-up.

RESULTS

Symptomatic arrhythmias occurred in 17.2% of patients during a mean follow-up of 678 days after AVNRT ablation. The patients with symptomatic arrhythmias were more often female and suffered from structural heart disease. Arrhythmia occurrence was clinically relevant regarding symptoms and patient satisfaction. Serious adverse events including stroke, transient ischemic attack, pacemaker implantation, as well as continued use of antiarrhythmic medication occurred more often in group A. A second ablation procedure was performed in 26% of symptomatic patients to optimize the symptomatic outcome, whereas cardiovascular events or patient satisfaction were not further improved.

CONCLUSION

During long-term follow-up, one out of six patients experienced symptomatic arrhythmias after AVNRT ablation, associated with an increase of serious adverse events. A subset of patients required medical or interventional antiarrhythmic therapy, possibly attributable to the co-existence of other arrhythmias. Screening for arrhythmic and cardiac co-morbidity before and after ablation may support comprehensive therapy planning and outcome.

Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) as a Predictor of Incident Atrial Fibrillation

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker of chronic low-grade inflammation and a potent predictor of cardiovascular events. We hypothesized that plasma suPAR levels would predict new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in a large cohort of con-secutively admitted acute medical patients during long-term follow-up. In 14,764 acutely ad-mitted patients without prior or current AF, median suPAR measured upon admission was 2.7 ng/ml (interquartile range (IQR) 1.9-4.0). During a median follow-up of 392 days (IQR 218-577), 349 patients (2.4%) were diagnosed with incident AF. suPAR levels at admission significantly predicted subsequent incident AF (HR per doubling of suPAR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.41, adjusted for age and sex). After further adjustment for Charlson score, plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), plasma creatinine and blood hemoglobin-levels, the result remained essentially unaltered (HR per doubling of suPAR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42). In multivariate ROC curve analysis, combining age, sex, Charlson score, CRP, creatinine, and hemoglobin (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.75-0.79), the addition of suPAR did not improve the prediction of incident AF (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.75-0.79, P=0.89). Plasma suPAR is independently associated with subsequent new-onset AF in a population of recently hospitalized patients, but the addition of suPAR to baseline risk markers appears not to improve the prediction of AF.