Spatial relationship of organized rotational and focal sources in human atrial fibrillation to autonomic ganglionated plexi

Impact of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation on Disease Progression

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a major public health challenge worldwide with a globally increasing prevalence and exponential increase in health care costs. The progression from paroxysmal (defined as self-terminating episodes of AF lasting <7 days) to persistent AF (eg, AF episodes lasting longer than 7 days) is associated with premature mortality, increasing incidence of thromboembolism and heart failure, as well as increased rates of hospitalization and health care use. Given recognition that complications of AF increase as the disease advances, there is an urgent need to ensure therapeutic interventions are capable of delaying or halting disease progression. Whereas pharmacotherapy can be relatively effective at managing the symptoms associated with AF, antiarrhythmic drugs are less effective than catheter ablation in reducing arrhythmia burden, improving quality of life, and reducing health care use. Moreover, pharmacologic therapy does not modify the pathophysiological processes responsible for disease progression. Catheter ablation confers a more comprehensive disease-modifying intervention, targeting multiple mechanisms underlying AF progression through a combination of trigger elimination, electroanatomical substrate modification, and autonomic nervous system modulation. Until recently, the belief that catheter ablation was an effective method to prevent disease progression was mostly speculative. However, recent randomized controlled trials have established catheter ablation as disease-modifying intervention. Given this knowledge, it appears that early intervention is critical to optimally affect the disease progression. The purpose of this paper is to review the rationale and evidence supporting disease modification using catheter ablation as a key part of the AF treatment paradigm.

lncRNA-056298 Regulates GAP43 and Promotes Cardiac Intrinsic Autonomic Nerve Remodelling in a Canine Model of Atrial Fibrillation Induction after Ganglionated Plexus Ablation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling has been reported to play an important role in the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation, which significantly affects the long-term efficacy of this procedure. lncRNAs have been shown to interact in the pathological processes underlying heart diseases. However, the roles and mechanisms of lncRNAs in cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling during atrial fibrillation reduction after ganglionated plexus ablation remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism by which lncRNA- 056298 modulates GAP43 to affect cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling and facilitate the induction of atrial fibrillation after ganglionated plexus ablation.

METHODS

A canine model of right atrial ganglionated plexus ablation was established. The atrial electrophysiological characteristics and neural markers were detected before and after 6 months of ganglionated plexus ablation. High-throughput sequencing was used to screen differentially expressed lncRNAs in target atrial tissues, and lncRNA- 056298 was selected to further explore its effects and mechanisms on cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling.

RESULTS

The induction rate of atrial fibrillation increased in dogs after ganglionated plexus ablation. Overexpression of lncRNA-056298 by lentivirus can shorten the atrial effective refractory period and increase the induction of atrial fibrillation. lncRNA- 056298 promoted cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling via endogenous competition with cfa-miR-185 to induce transcription of its target gene GAP43, thereby affecting the induction of atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSION

lncRNA-056298 regulates GAP43 by sponging miR-185, which affects cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling and mediates atrial fibrillation induction after ganglionated plexus ablation.

Percutaneous Neuromodulation for Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous neuromodulation is emerging as a promising therapeutic approach for atrial fibrillation (AF). This article explores techniques such as ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation, and vagus nerve stimulation, pinpointing their potential in modulating AF triggers and maintenance. Noninvasive methods, such as transcutaneous low-level tragus stimulation, offer innovative treatment pathways, with early trials indicating a significant reduction in AF burden. GP ablation may address autonomic triggers, and the potential for GP ablation in neuromodulation is discussed. The article stresses the necessity for more rigorous clinical trials to validate the safety, reproducibility, and efficacy of these neuromodulation techniques in AF treatment.

The individual relationship between atrial fibrillation sources from CARTOFINDER mapping and atrial cardiomyopathy: The catch me if you can trial

BACKGROUND

Targeting individual sources identified during atrial fibrillation (AF) has been used as an ablation strategy with varying results.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between regions of interest (ROIs) from CARTOFINDER (CF) mapping and atrial cardiomyopathy from late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients underwent index catheter ablation for persistent AF (PERS AF). Pre-processed LGE CMR images were merged with the results from CF mapping to visualize harboring regions for focal and rotational activities. Atrial cardiomyopathy was classified based on the four Utah stages.

RESULTS

Procedural success was achieved in all patients (n = 20, 100%). LGE CMR revealed an intermediate amount of 21.41% ± 6.32% for LA fibrosis. ROIs were identified in all patients (mean no ROIs per patient n = 416.45 ± 204.57). A tendency towards a positive correlation between the total amount of atrial cardiomyopathy and the total number of ROIs per patient (regression coefficient, β = 10.86, p = .15) was observed. The degree of fibrosis and the presence of ROIs per segment showed no consistent spatial correlation (posterior: β = 0.36, p-value (p) = .24; anterior: β = -0.08, p = .54; lateral: β = 0.31, p = 39; septal: β = -0.12; p = .66; right PVs: β = 0.34, p = .27; left PVs: β = 0.07, p = .79; LAA: β = -0.91, p = .12). 12 months AF-free survival was 70% (n = 14) after ablation.

CONCLUSION

The presence of ROIs from CF mapping was not directly associated with the extent and location of fibrosis. Further studies evaluating the relationship between focal and rotational activity and atrial cardiomyopathy are mandatory.

Effect of pulmonary vein isolation on rotor/multiple wavelet dynamics in persistent atrial fibrillation, association with vagal response and implications for adjunctive ablation

Persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) may develop arrhythmogenic substrates of rotors/multiple wavelets. However, the ways in which pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) affects the dynamics of rotor/multiple wavelets in PeAF patients remain elusive. Real-time phase-mapping (ExTRa mapping, EXT) in the whole left atrium (LA) was performed during PeAF before and after PVI (n = 111). The percentage of time in which rotor/multiple wavelets (phase singularities) was observed during each 5-s phase-mapping recording (non-passive activation ratio, %NP) was measured as an index of its burden. The mapping areas showing %NP ≥ 50% were defined as rotor/multiple-wavelet substrates (RSs). Before PVI, RSs were globally distributed in the LA. After PVI, %NP decreased (< 50%) in many RSs (PVI-modifiable RSs) but remained high (≥ 50%) in some RSs, especially localized in the anterior/septum/inferior regions (PVI-unmodifiable RSs, 2.3 ± 1.0 areas/patient). Before PVI, vagal response (VR) to high-frequency stimulation was observed in 23% of RSs, especially localized in the inferior region. VR disappearance after PVI was more frequently observed in PVI-modifiable RSs (79%) than in PVI-unmodifiable RSs (55%, p < 0.05), suggesting that PVI affects autonomic nerve activities and rotor/multiple wavelet dynamics. PVI-unmodifiable RSs were adjunctively ablated in 104 patients. The 1-year AT/AF-free survival rate was 70% in those with PVI alone (n = 115), and 86% in patients with the adjunctive ablation (log-rank test = 7.65, p < 0.01). PVI suppresses not only ectopic firing but also rotor/multiple wavelets partly via modification of autonomic nerve activities. The adjunctive ablation of PVI-unmodifiable RSs improved the outcome in PeAF patients and might be a novel ablation strategy beyond PVI.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Atrial Fibrillation: Revealing the Paradox

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiovascular disease can cause an imbalance within the CANS, which may contribute to the initiation and maintenance of AF. Increased understanding of neuromodulation of the CANS has resulted in novel emerging therapies to treat cardiac arrhythmias by targeting different circuits of the CANS. Regarding AF, neuromodulation therapies targeting the vagus nerve have yielded promising outcomes. However, targeting the vagus nerve can be both pro-arrhythmogenic and anti-arrhythmogenic. Currently, these opposing effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) have not been clearly described. The aim of this review is therefore to discuss both pro-arrhythmogenic and anti-arrhythmogenic effects of VNS and recent advances in clinical practice and to provide future perspectives for VNS to treat AF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive review of current literature on VNS and its pro-arrhythmogenic and anti-arrhythmogenic effects on atrial tissue was performed. Both experimental and clinical studies are reviewed and discussed separately.

RESULTS

VNS exhibits both pro-arrhythmogenic and anti-arrhythmogenic effects. The anatomical site and stimulation settings during VNS play a crucial role in determining its effect on cardiac electrophysiology. Since the last decade, there is accumulating evidence from experimental studies and randomized clinical studies that low-level VNS (LLVNS), below the bradycardia threshold, is an effective treatment for AF.

CONCLUSION

LLVNS is a promising novel therapeutic modality to treat AF and further research will further elucidate the underlying anti-arrhythmogenic mechanisms, optimal stimulation settings, and site to apply LLVNS.

Autonomic Neuromodulation for Atrial Fibrillation Following Cardiac Surgery: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Autonomic neuromodulation therapies (ANMTs) (ie, ganglionated plexus ablation, epicardial injections for temporary neurotoxicity, low-level vagus nerve stimulation [LL-VNS], stellate ganglion block, baroreceptor stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, and renal nerve denervation) constitute an emerging therapeutic approach for arrhythmias. Very little is known about ANMTs' preventive potential for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this review is to summarize and critically appraise the currently available evidence. Herein, the authors conducted a systematic review of 922 articles that yielded 7 randomized controlled trials. In the meta-analysis, ANMTs reduced POAF incidence (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.55) and burden (mean difference [MD]: -3.51 hours; 95% CI: -6.64 to -0.38 hours), length of stay (MD: -0.82 days; 95% CI: -1.59 to -0.04 days), and interleukin-6 (MD: -79.92 pg/mL; 95% CI: -151.12 to -8.33 pg/mL), mainly attributed to LL-VNS and epicardial injections. Moving forward, these findings establish a base for future larger and comparative trials with ANMTs, to optimize and expand their use.

Identifying Atrial Fibrillation Mechanisms for Personalized Medicine

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of heart failure and stroke. The early maintenance of sinus rhythm has been shown to reduce major cardiovascular endpoints, yet is difficult to achieve. For instance, it is unclear how discoveries at the genetic and cellular level can be used to tailor pharmacotherapy. For non-pharmacologic therapy, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone of rhythm control, yet has suboptimal success. Improving these therapies will likely require a multifaceted approach that personalizes therapy based on mechanisms measured in individuals across biological scales. We review AF mechanisms from cell-to-organ-to-patient from this perspective of personalized medicine, linking them to potential clinical indices and biomarkers, and discuss how these data could influence therapy. We conclude by describing approaches to improve ablation, including the emergence of several mapping systems that are in use today.

The Electrophysiology of Atrial Fibrillation: From Basic Mechanisms to Catheter Ablation

The electrophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) has always been a deep mystery in understanding this complex arrhythmia. The pathophysiological mechanisms of AF are complex and often remain unclear despite extensive research. Therefore, the implementation of basic science knowledge to clinical practice is challenging. After more than 20 years, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone ablation strategy for maintaining the sinus rhythm (SR). However, there is no doubt that, in many cases, especially in persistent and long-standing persistent AF, PVI is not enough, and eventually, the restoration of SR occurs after additional intervention in the rest of the atrial myocardium. Substrate mapping is a modern challenge as it can reveal focal sources or rotational activities that may be responsible for maintaining AF. Whether these areas are actually the cause of the AF maintenance is unknown. If this really happens, then the targeted ablation may be the solution; otherwise, more rough techniques such as atrial compartmentalization may prove to be more effective. In this article, we attempt a broad review of the known pathophysiological mechanisms of AF, and we present the recent efforts of advanced technology initially to reveal the electrical impulse during AF and then to intervene effectively with ablation.

Comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope

BACKGROUND

Ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation is used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) and vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, the comparative effects of GP ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and VVS have not been well studied.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intensive GP ablation on PAF and VVS.

METHODS

PAF and VVS patients were enrolled in this study. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in the PAF group, and additional ablation was performed at GP sites. Anatomic ablation of left atrial GPs was performed in the VVS group. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or other sustained atrial tachycardia and syncope recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients were enrolled: 146 patients with PAF, including eight patients with combined VVS (PAF group), and 49 patients with VVS (VVS group). Vasovagal response (VR) was achieved in 78 (53.4%) patients in the PAF group and 48 patients (98.0%) in the VVS group (P < .05). During the 17.8 ± 10.5 (range, 3-42) month follow-up, 126 (86.3%) patients were free of AF in the PAF group, and 45 (91.8%) patients in the VVS group had no syncope recurrence and significantly improved symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomically guided intensive GP ablation showed efficient clinical outcomes for both groups of patients. Compared with PAF patients, VVS patients had more VR during ablation in the left atrium. Furthermore, VR during ablation indicated a better prognosis in PAF patients.

Effect of Lidocaine Injection of Ganglionated Plexi in a Canine Model and Patients With Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background

This study assessed the effect of blockading neural transmission in the ganglionated plexi by injecting lidocaine into fat pads in the vagal nerve stimulation canine model and patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods and Results

An efficacy test of lidocaine injection was performed in 7 canines. During vagal nerve stimulation, AF was sustained for >5 minutes. The lidocaine was injected into ganglionated plexi during sinus rhythm and reinduction of AF was attempted. Six patients with persistent AF were studied at open heart surgery. Lidocaine was injected into ganglionated plexi. Atrial electrograms were recorded from 96 epicardial electrodes covering Bachmann's bundle and atrial appendages. In the canine vagal nerve stimulation AF model, AF was not inducible in 4 of 7 after lidocaine injection. In patients with persistent AF, during baseline AF, there was a left atrium (LA)‐to‐right atrium (RA) frequency gradient (LA, mean cycle length [CL] 175±17 ms; RA, mean CL 192±17 ms; P<0.01). After lidocaine injection, AF persisted in all patients, and the LA‐to‐RA frequency gradient disappeared (LA, mean CL 186±13 ms; RA, mean CL 199±23 ms; P=0.08). Comparison of mean CLs before and after lidocaine demonstrated prolongation of LA CLs (P<0.05) with no effect on RA CLs.

Conclusions

In the canine vagal nerve stimulation AF model, lidocaine injection decreased inducibility of AF. In patients with persistent AF, atrial electrograms from the LA had shorter CLs than RA, indicating an LA‐to‐RA frequency gradient. Lidocaine injection significantly prolonged only LA CLs, explaining disappearance of the LA‐to‐RA frequency gradient. The mechanism of localized atrial electrogram CL prolongation in patients with persistent AF is uncertain.

See Editorial Hanna et al

Mapping and Ablation of Rotational and Focal Drivers in Atrial Fibrillation

Drivers are increasingly studied ablation targets for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, results from ablation remain controversial. First, outcomes vary between centers and patients. Second, it is unclear how best to perform driver ablation. Third, there is a lack of practical guidance on how to identify critical from secondary sites using different AF mapping methods. This article addresses each of these issues.

Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Heart Rhythm Disorders

•

Derangement of autonomic nervous signaling is an important contributor to cardiac arrhythmogenesis.

•

Modulation of autonomic nervous signaling holds significant promise for the prevention and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.

•

Further clinical investigation is necessary to establish the efficacy and safety of autonomic modulatory therapies in reducing cardiac arrhythmias.

There is an increasing recognition of the importance of interactions between the heart and the autonomic nervous system in the pathophysiology of arrhythmias. These interactions play a role in both the initiation and maintenance of arrhythmias and are important in both atrial and ventricular arrhythmia. Given the importance of the autonomic nervous system in the pathophysiology of arrhythmias, there has been notable effort in the field to improve existing therapies and pioneer additional interventions directed at cardiac-autonomic targets. The interventions are targeted to multiple and different anatomic targets across the neurocardiac axis. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the rationale for neuromodulation in the treatment of arrhythmias and to review the specific treatments under evaluation and development for the treatment of both atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias.

EHRA White Paper: knowledge gaps in arrhythmia management-status 2019

Clinicians accept that there are many unknowns when we make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Acceptance of uncertainty is essential for the pursuit of the profession: bedside decisions must often be made on the basis of incomplete evidence. Over the years, physicians sometimes even do not realize anymore which the fundamental gaps in our knowledge are. As clinical scientists, however, we have to halt and consider what we do not know yet, and how we can move forward addressing those unknowns. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) believes that scanning the field of arrhythmia / cardiac electrophysiology to identify knowledge gaps which are not yet the subject of organized research, should be undertaken on a regular basis. Such a review (White Paper) should concentrate on research which is feasible, realistic, and clinically relevant, and should not deal with futuristic aspirations. It fits with the EHRA mission that these White Papers should be shared on a global basis in order to foster collaborative and needed research which will ultimately lead to better care for our patients. The present EHRA White Paper summarizes knowledge gaps in the management of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/sudden death and heart failure.

Drivers of Atrial Fibrillation: Theoretical Considerations and Practical Concerns

Understanding the mechanisms responsible for driving AF is key to improving the procedural success for AF ablation. In this review, we look at some of the proposed drivers of AF, the disagreement between experts and the challenges confronted in attempting to map AF. Defining a 'driver' is also controversial, but for the purposes of this review we will consider an AF driver to be either a focal or localised source demonstrating fast, repetitive activity that propagates outward from this source, breaking down in to disorganisation further away from its origin.

The short-term impact of the catheter ablation on noninvasive autonomic nervous system parameters in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a potentially potent modulator of the initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF), whereas the presence of AF can activate and alter the ANS. The catheter ablation of AF (AFCA) may cause the cardiac ANS dysfunction, whereas restoration of sinus rhythm or sympathovagal imbalance by AFCA can reverse this process. Our principal goal was to investigate the short-term effect of AFCA on ANS functions evaluated by noninvasive chronotropic (CI), resting heart rate (RHR), and heart rate recovery (HRR) indices.

METHOD

A total of 45 patients were enrolled with symptomatic, drug refractory paroxysmal AF undergoing first cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) with one 28-mm CB using single 3-minute freeze techniques without bonus applications. All patients underwent symptom-limited exercise treadmill testing to evaluate noninvasive parameters of ANS before PVAI. For those patients who remained in sinus rhythm, an additional exercise test was repeated after 1 and 3 months after discharge.

RESULTS

The autonomic CI and RHR/HRR indices were impaired after PVAI and persisted post-PVAI 3 months. However, these parameters were not different in patients with and without recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the successful AFCA might concurrently impair the ANS parameters. The autonomic imbalance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic activity after AFCA could either become antiarrhythmic and/or proarrhythmic based on which of the two components was going to prevail after successful AFCA. The impaired ANS balance after PVAI might also be another hypothetical mechanism for AF recurrence particularly in the absence of PV reconnection.