Differential and prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived scoring algorithm in cardiac tumors

Multiparametric mapping by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in cardiac tumors

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of quantitative measurements of cardiac tumors and myocardium using parametric mapping techniques. This study aims to explore quantitative characteristics and diagnostic performance of native T1, T2, and extracellular volume (ECV) values of cardiac tumors and left ventricular (LV) myocardium.

METHODS

Patients with suspected cardiac tumors who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) between November 2013 and March 2021 were prospectively enrolled. The diagnoses of primary benign or malignant tumors were based on pathologic findings if available, comprehensive medical history evaluations, imaging, and long-term follow-up data. Patients with pseudo-tumors, cardiac metastasis, primary cardiac diseases, and prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy were excluded. Multiparametric mapping values were measured on both cardiac tumors and the LV myocardium. Statistical analyses were performed using independent-samples t-test, receiver operating characteristic, and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients diagnosed with benign (n = 54), or primary malignant cardiac tumors (n = 26), and 50 age and sex-matched healthy volunteers were included. Intergroup differences in the T1 and T2 values of cardiac tumors were not significant, however, patients with primary malignant cardiac tumors showed significantly higher mean myocardial T1 values (1360 ± 61.4 ms) compared with patients with benign tumors (1259.7 ± 46.2 ms), and normal controls (1206 ± 44.0 ms, all P < 0.05) at 3 T. Patients with primary malignant cardiac tumors also showed significantly higher mean ECV (34.6 ± 5.2%) compared with patients with benign (30.0 ± 2.5%) tumors, and normal controls (27.3 ± 3.0%, all P < 0.05). For the differentiation between primary malignant and benign cardiac tumors, the mean myocardial native T1 value showed the highest efficacy (AUC: 0.919, cutoff value: 1300 ms) compared with mean ECV (AUC: 0.817) and T2 (AUC: 0.619) values.

CONCLUSION

Native T1 and T2 of cardiac tumors showed high heterogeneity, while myocardial native T1 values in primary malignant cardiac tumors were elevated compared to patients with benign cardiac tumors, which may serve as a new imaging marker for primary malignant cardiac tumors.

The diagnostic accuracy of contrast echocardiography in patients with suspected cardiac masses: A preliminary multicenter, cross-sectional study

Background

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast echocardiography (CE) in patients with suspected cardiac masses.

Methods

A multicenter, prospective study involving 108 consecutive patients with suspected cardiac masses based on transthoracic echocardiography performed between November 2019 and December 2020 was carried out. CE examinations were performed in all patients. The echocardiographic diagnosis was established according to the qualitative (echogenicity, boundary, morphology of the base, mass perfusion, pericardial effusion, and motility) and quantitative (area of the masses and peak intensity ratio of the masses and adjacent myocardium A1/A2) evaluations.

Results

Final confirmed diagnoses were as follows: no cardiac mass (n = 3), pseudomass (n = 3), thrombus (n = 36), benign tumor (n = 30), and malignant tumor (n = 36). ROC analysis revealed the optimal A1/A2 with cutoff value of 0.295 for a cardiac tumor from a thrombus, with AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.958 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.899–0.988), 100, 91.7, 95.7, and 100%, respectively. CE was able to distinguish malignant from benign tumors with an AUC of 0.953 (95% CI: 0.870–0.990). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that tumor area, base, and A1/A2 were associated with the risk of malignant tumor (OR = 1.003, 95% CI: 1.00003–1.005; OR = 22.64, 95% CI: 1.30–395.21; OR = 165.39, 95% CI: 4.68–5,850.94, respectively). When using A1/A2 > 1.28 as the only diagnostic criterion to identify the malignant tumor, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.886 (95% CI: 0.784–0.951), 80.6, 96.7, 96.7, and 80.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

CE has the potential to accurately differentiate cardiac masses by combining qualitative and quantitative analyses. However, more studies with a large sample size should be conducted to further confirm these findings.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier: ChiCTR1900026809.