Impact of vascular morphology and plaque characteristics on computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve in early stage coronary artery disease

Impact of vessel morphology on CT-derived fractional-flow-reserve in non-obstructive coronary artery disease in right coronary artery

OBJECTIVES

Computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) decreases continuously from proximal to distal segments of the vessel due to the influence of various factors even in non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD). It is known that FFRCT is dependent on vessel-length, but the relationship with other vessel morphologies remains to be explained.

PURPOSE

To investigate morphological aspects of the vessels that influence FFRCT in NOCAD in the right coronary artery (RCA).

METHODS

A total of 443 patients who underwent both FFRCT and invasive coronary angiography, with < 50% RCA stenosis, were evaluated. Enrolled RCA vessels were classified into two groups according to distal FFRCT: FFRCT ≤ 0.80 (n = 60) and FFRCT > 0.80 (n = 383). Vessel morphology (vessel length, lumen diameter, lumen volume, and plaque volume) and left-ventricular mass were assessed. The ratio of lumen volume and vessel length was defined as V/L ratio.

RESULTS

Whereas vessel-length was almost the same between FFRCT ≤ 0.80 and > 0.80, lumen volume and V/L ratio were significantly lower in FFRCT ≤ 0.80. Distal FFRCT correlated with plaque-related parameters (low-attenuation plaque, intermediate-attenuation plaque, and calcified plaque) and vessel-related parameters (proximal and distal vessel diameter, vessel length, lumen volume, and V/L ratio). Among all vessel-related parameters, V/L ratio showed the highest correlation with distal FFRCT (r = 0.61, p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that calcified plaque volume was the strongest predictor of distal FFRCT, followed by V/L ratio (β-coefficient = 0.48, p = 0.03). V/L ratio was the strongest predictor of a distal FFRCT ≤ 0.80 (cut-off 8.1 mm3/mm, AUC 0.88, sensitivity 90.0%, specificity 76.7%, 95% CI 0.84-0.93, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that V/L ratio can be a measure to predict subclinical coronary perfusion disturbance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

A novel marker of the ratio of lumen volume to vessel length (V/L ratio) is the strongest predictor of a distal CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) and may have the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT.

KEY POINTS

• Physiological FFRCT decline depends not only on vessel length but also on the lumen volume in non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the right coronary artery. • FFRCT correlates with plaque-related parameters (low-attenuation plaque, intermediate-attenuation plaque, and calcified plaque) and vessel-related parameters (proximal and distal vessel diameter, vessel length, lumen volume, and V/L ratio). • Of vessel-related parameters, V/L ratio is the strongest predictor of a distal FFRCT and an optimal cut-off value of 8.1 mm3/mm.

Impact of ramus coronary artery on computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT ) in no apparent coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

The ramus artery contributes to the development of turbulence, which may influence computed tomography (CT) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT ) even without coronary artery disease (CAD). The relationship between ramus-induced turbulence and FFR_CT is unclear.

METHOD AND RESULTS

A total of 120 patients with <20% coronary stenosis assessed by both FFR_CT and invasive coronary angiography were evaluated. The patients were divided into three groups: absent-ramus (n = 72), small-ramus that could not be analyzed by FFR_CT (n = 18), and large-ramus that could be analyzed by FFR_CT (n = 30). FFR_CT measurements were performed at the proximal and distal segments of the left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and ramus artery. With absent-ramus and small-absent ramus groups, FFR_CT was measured at the distal end of the left main trunk at the same level for the proximal segments of the LAD and LCX. In absent-ramus group, proximal FFR_CT showed no significant differences between three vessels (LAD = .96 ± .02; MID = .97 ± .02; LCX = .97 ± .02). However, in small and large-ramus groups, proximal FFR_CT was significantly higher in the ramus artery than LAD and LCX (small-ramus, LAD = .95 ± .03, Ramus = .97 ± .02, LCX = .95 ± .03; large-ramus: LAD = .95 ± .03, Ramus = .98 ± .01; LCX = .96 ± .03; p < .05). A large ramus was associated with a higher prevalence of a distal FFR_CT ≤.80 (odds ratio 7.0, 95% CI 1.2-40.1, p = .03). A proximal ramus diameter predicted distal FFR_CT ≤.80 (cut-off 2.1 mm, AUC .76, sensitivity 100%, specificity 52%, 95% CI .61-.90).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a large-ramus artery may cause an FFR_CT decline in no apparent CAD.

Impact of coronary bifurcation angle on computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve in coronary vessels with no apparent coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

Computed tomography (CT) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) decreases from the proximal to the distal part due to a variety of factors. The energy loss due to the bifurcation angle may potentially contribute to a progressive decline in FFR_CT. However, the association of the bifurcation angle with FFR_CT is still not entirely understood. This study aimed to investigate the impact of various bifurcation angles on FFR_CT decline below the clinically crucial relevance of 0.80 in vessels with no apparent coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

A total of 83 patients who underwent both CT angiography including FFR_CT and invasive coronary angiography, exhibiting no apparent CAD were evaluated. ΔFFR_CT was defined as the change in FFR_CT from the proximal to the distal in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex artery (LCX). The bifurcation angle was calculated from three-dimensional volume rendered images. Vessel morphology and plaque characteristics were also assessed.

RESULTS

ΔFFR_CT significantly correlated with the bifurcation angle (LAD angle, r = 0.35, p = 0.001; LCX angle, r = 0.26, p = 0.02) and vessel length (LAD angle, r = 0.30, p = 0.005; LCX angle, r = 0.49, p < 0.0001). In LAD, vessel length was the strongest predictor for distal FFR_CT of ≤ 0.80 (β-coefficient = 0.55, p = 0.0003), immediately followed by the bifurcation angle (β-coefficient = 0.24, p = 0.02). The bifurcation angle was a good predictor for a distal FFR_CT ≤ 0.80 (LAD angle, cut-off 31.0°, AUC 0.70, sensitivity 74%, specificity 68%; LCX angle, cut-off 52.6°, AUC 0.86, sensitivity 88%, specificity 85%).

CONCLUSIONS

In vessels with no apparent CAD, vessel length was the most influential factor on FFR_CT, directly followed by the bifurcation angle.

KEY POINTS

• Both LAD and LCX bifurcation angles are factors influencing FFR _CT. • Bifurcation angle is one of the predictors of a distal FFR_CT of ≤ 0.80 and an optimal cut-off value of 31.0° for the LAD and 52.6° for the LCX. • Bifurcation angle should be taken into consideration when interpreting numerical values of FFR_CT.