Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair

Validation of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Vascular Surgery (REAL_VS) in a Veteran Population

BACKGROUND

Health care literacy has been linked to patient health and outcomes. Health literacy tests (HLTs) are hampered by administration time and specialty specific utility. The 75-word Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Vascular Surgery (REAL_VS) was developed from the more extensive but less specific Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) to assess vascular health literacy (HL). We aim to validate the use of the REAL_VS in a veteran population, using the REALM as the gold standard.

METHODS

Vascular surgery patients were examined utilizing these HLTs at a level 1A Veterans Affairs hospital. Sociodemographic information was collected. Spearman's rank correlations (⍴) and area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for a sixth-grade educational threshold (6-ET).

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-seven English-speaking patients (mean age = 69 ± 11.9 years) were enrolled. REAL_VS scores were highly correlated with REALM scores (⍴ = 0.86 and 0.77; P < 0.001, respectively). A REAL_VS score of 54 corresponded to the established REALM 6-ET score of 44 with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.875 and 0.96, respectively. The AUC for the REAL_VS predicting less than 6-ET was 0.985 with CI = 0.97-1.00.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the REAL_VS may be used to accurately assess vascular HL in veteran patients undergoing vascular surgery consultation and may aid in assessing specialty specific HL.

Biased Language in Simulated Handoffs and Clinician Recall and Attitudes

Importance

Poor-quality handoffs can lead to medical errors when transitioning patient care. Biased language within handoffs may contribute to errors and lead to disparities in health care delivery.

Objective

To compare clinical information recall accuracy and attitudes toward patients among trainees in paired cases of biased vs neutral language in simulated handoffs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Surveys administered from April 29 to June 15 and from July 20 to October 10, 2023, included 3 simulated verbal handoffs, randomized between biased and neutral, and measured clinical information recall, attitudes toward patients, and key takeaways after each handoff. Participants included residents in internal medicine, pediatrics, and internal medicine-pediatrics and senior medical students at 2 academic medical centers in different geographic regions of the US. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to June 2024.

Exposures

Each participant received 3 handoffs that were based on real handoffs about Black patients at 1 academic center. These handoffs were each randomized to either a biased or neutral version. Biased handoffs had 1 of 3 types of bias: stereotype, blame, or doubt. The order of handoff presentation was also randomized. Internal medicine and pediatrics residents received slightly different surveys, tailored for their specialty. Internal medicine-pediatrics residents received the pediatric survey. Medical students were randomly assigned the survey type.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Each handoff was followed by a clinical information recall question, an adapted version of the Provider Attitudes Toward Sickle Cell Patients Scale (PASS), and 3 free-response takeaways.

Results

Of 748 trainees contacted, 169 participants (142 residents and 27 medical students) completed the survey (23% overall response rate), distributed across institutions, residency programs, and years of training (95 female [56%]; mean [SD] age, 28.6 [2.3] years). Participants who received handoffs with blame-based bias had less accurate information recall than those who received neutral handoffs (77% vs 93%; P = .005). Those who reported bias as a key takeaway of the handoff had lower clinical information recall accuracy than those who did not (85% vs 93%; P = .01). Participants had less positive attitudes toward patients per PASS scores after receiving biased compared with neutral handoffs (mean scores, 22.9 [3.3] vs 25.2 [2.7]; P < .001). More positive attitudes toward patients were associated with higher clinical information recall accuracy (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this survey study of residents and medical students, biased handoffs impeded accurate transfer of key clinical information and decreased empathy, potentially endangering patients and worsening health disparities. Handoff standardization is critical to addressing racial bias and improving patient safety.

Inequities in Access to Tricuspid Valve Treatments: The Impact of Procedure and Volume Requirements

Background

Opportunities to minimize inequities in accessing treatments for tricuspid regurgitation disease should be considered.

Objective

The objective of this study was to explore how access to new tricuspid regurgitation technologies change when heart centers are restricted by payer coverage requirements.

Methods

This case series study identified U.S. hospitals with a record of performing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, and tricuspid and mitral valve procedures for the calendar year 2021. Population 65+ years of age and Area Deprivation Index (ADI), were identified by zip code. We created 10 scenarios based on low, medium, and high hospital volumes for combinations of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, tricuspid and mitral valve procedures. Distance from a zip code to scenario eligible hospitals was determined; the closest hospital to a zip code was identified as the distance someone with tricuspid regurgitation would have to travel for care. Each scenario was modeled with the dependent variable as the distance to the nearest scenario eligible hospital by ADI, controlling for population size 65+ years of age.

Results

A total of 929 U.S. hospitals met our study inclusion. ADI was statistically significant in every scenario-when ADI goes up (more deprivation), distance to the nearest hospital increases. Patients in zip codes with low ADI travel an average of 15 to 52 miles, medium ADI 31 to 67 miles, and high ADI 47 to 95 miles.

Conclusions

Patients in higher socioeconomic deprivation areas travel longer distances to hospitals meeting procedure volume requirements. Policymakers and patient advocacy groups should consider this to ensure equitable access to potentially life-saving technologies.

Next-Day Discharge After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With the ACURATE neo/neo2 Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis

Previous studies have shown the safety of early discharge pathways in selected patients and using selected transcatheter heart valves. Hence, we sought to evaluate the safety of next-day discharge (NDD) in patients who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) with the ACURATE neo/neo2 (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) self-expanding aortic bioprosthesis. Patients who underwent TF-TAVI between January 2018 and April 2023 were prospectively included. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to discharge times within 24 hours (NDD), between 24 and 48 hours, and those discharged >48 hours after TAVI. The primary outcome was the first unplanned readmission at 30 days after TAVI. Log-rank test was used to assess the differences in the outcome of interest between the groups. A total of 368 all-comers were included in this study. According to discharge times, 204 patients followed NDD, 69 patients 24 to 48 hours discharge, and 95 patients >48 hours discharge after TAVI. The mean age was 84 ± 6.3 years and 61% were women, without differences between the groups. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was lower in those with NDD versus 24 to 48 hours and >48 hours (2.9 ± 1.0, 3.2 ± 1.2, and 3.4 ± 1.4, respectively, p = 0.014). There were no differences between the groups in terms of preprocedural right bundle branch block or pacemaker. The need for new permanent pacemaker implantation was the leading postprocedural complication; it occurred more frequently in the >48 hours group than the 24 to 48 hours, and <24 hours groups (24% vs 8.6% and 2.2%, p <0.001). There were 5 strokes (1.4%) and all of them occurred in the >48 hours group (p = 0.005). At 30 days after discharge, there were no deaths and no differences in all-cause readmissions (9.3% in <24 hours, 8.6% in 24 to 48 hours, and 19% in >48 hours, log-rank p = 0.087). The readmission rates for new permanent pacemaker implantation requirement were 3.3% (n = 6) in NDD, 0% in 24 to 48 hours, and 1.6% (n = 5) in the >48 hours groups (p = 0.27). In conclusion, in unselected patients who underwent TF-TAVI with the ACURATE neo/neo2 self-expanding bioprosthesis, the NDD pathway is feasible and appears to be safe, without an increased risk of death or all-cause rehospitalization through 30 days after hospital discharge.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Peri-and Post-operative Cardiac Surgery

Purpose of Review

Despite efforts to curtail its impact on medical care, race remains a powerful risk factor for morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery. While patients from racial and ethnic minority groups are underrepresented in cardiac surgery, they experience a disproportionally elevated number of adverse outcomes following various cardiac surgical procedures. This review provides a summary of existing literature highlighting disparities in coronary artery bypass surgery, valvular surgery, cardiac transplantation, and mechanical circulatory support.

Recent Findings

Unfortunately, specific causes of these disparities can be difficult to identify, even in large, multicenter studies, due to the complex relationship between race and post-operative outcomes. Current data suggest that these racial/ethnic disparities can be attributed to a combination of patient, socioeconomic, and hospital setting characteristics.

Summary

Proposed solutions to combat the mechanisms underlying the observed disparate outcomes require deployment of a multidisciplinary team of cardiologists, anesthesiologists, cardiac surgeons, and experts in health care equity and medical ethics. Successful identification of at-risk populations and the implementation of preventive measures are necessary first steps towards dismantling racial/ethnic differences in cardiac surgery outcomes.

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Valvular Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Exploration of Equipment, Efficacy, Gender, Racial, and Socioeconomic Disparities, and Future Prospects

The 2 primary components of valvular heart disease are mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is an advanced, minimally invasive procedure that has recently displayed encouraging outcomes in the treatment of these pathologies. TEER offers a nonsurgical alternative for individuals diagnosed with conditions deemed to be high-risk surgical candidates. Currently, the TEER procedure employs devices such as MitraCLIP and TriCLIP, as well as innovative PASCAL (transcatheter valve repair system used for mitral and tricuspid valve repair) and FORMA (repair system used for tricuspid valve repair) repair systems. In the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial enrolling 614 patients to test the efficacy of TEER in MR, a significant reduction in hospitalization due to heart failure was observed at 24 months in the MitraClip + guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) group (35.8%) than in the GDMT-alone group (67.9%), HR, 0.53; P < 0.001, lower rate of all-cause mortality at 29.1% compared with 46.1% (P < 0.001), lower risk of cerebrovascular events (P = 0.001), and lower mortality due to cardiovascular events (P < 0.001). In another trial, patients with moderate TR or greater than New York Heart Association Class II or higher underwent TEER using the TriClip for the management of TR. The outcomes were encouraging, with 86% of patients showing a reduction in TR severity of at least one grade. As the technology and research surrounding TEER continue to progress, a more extensive range of patients are expected to qualify for TEER procedures. Our comprehensive review sought to extensively explore the background, equipment used, effectiveness of MR and TR, potential side effects, future prospects, and ongoing trials associated with TEER. We further discuss the existing gender, racial, and socioeconomic disparities in the realm of TEER.

Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Volumes and Trends

Background

Despite an association between operator volumes and procedural success, there remains an incomplete understanding of the contemporary utilization and procedural volumes for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MTEER). We aimed to identify annual operator procedural volumes, temporal trends, and geographic variability for MTEER among Medicare patients in the United States (US).

Methods

We queried the National Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Database for a CPT code (33418) specific for MitraClip device from 2015 through 2019. We analyzed annual operator procedural volumes and incidence and identified longitudinal and geographic trends in MTEER utilization.

Results

From 2015 through 2019, a total of 27,034 MTEER procedures were performed among Medicare patients in the US. The nationwide incidence increased from 6.2 per 100,000 patients in 2015 to 23.8 per 100,000 patients in 2019, a 283% increase over the study period (Ptrend < 0.001). The incidence of MTEER by state varied by nearly 900% (range 5.5 to 54.9 per 100,000 person-years). In 2019, the mean annual MTEER operator annual volume was 9.1 MTEER procedures and had grown from 6.2 per year in 2015.

Conclusions

In this nationwide study of Medicare beneficiaries in the United States, we identified a significant and sustained increase in the utilization of MTEER devices and operators and growth in annual procedural volumes from 2015 through 2019 with considerable variability in utilization by state. Further studies are needed to understand the clinical impact of variability in utilization and the optimal procedural volumes to ensure high efficacy outcomes and maintain critical access to MTEER therapies.

Readmissions After Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Previous Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

BACKGROUND

We examined the frequency and risk factors associated with readmission after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with and without previous ischemic stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

METHODS

Hospitalizations for LAAC were identified from the US National Readmission Database, 2016-2018. The primary outcome was the first unplanned readmission after LAAC, with readmission times stratified into those occurring within 0 to 30 days vs within 31 to 180 days. Patients were stratified based on the history of previous stroke and/or TIA.

RESULTS

Of 12,901 discharges after LAAC, 28% had previous stroke and/or TIA, and 8.2% had a readmission within 30 days while 18% had a readmission within 31 to 180 days. The rates of in-hospital complications and readmissions at both periods were not significantly different between individuals with vs without previous stroke and/or TIA. Cardiac causes accounted for 28% of readmissions within 30 days and 32% of those within 31 to 180 days, and congestive failure, bleeding, and infections were the most common readmission diagnoses. New stroke and/or TIA accounted for 4% and 6% of the total noncardiac readmissions within 30 days and 31 to 180 days, respectively, and the incidence was higher among those with previous stroke and/or TIA. Female sex and index hospitalization length of stay (LOS) > 1 day were factors independently associated with readmission within 30 days, whereas LOS, diabetes, renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anemia were among the factors associated with readmissions within 31 to 180 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned rehospitalizations were common after LAAC and had similar frequency for patients with vs without previous ischemic stroke and/or TIA. Female sex and index hospitalization LOS > 1 day were among the strongest factors that were independently associated with readmission within 30 days.

Racial disparities in characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

Background

There are scarce data regarding the post-mitral transcatheter edge-to-edger repair (TEER) course in different racial groups.

Objective

To assess the impact of race on outcomes following TEER for mitral regurgitation (MR).

Methods

This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive TEER procedures performed during 2013-2020. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure (HF) hospitalizations along the first postprocedural year. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, MR grade, and left ventricular mass index (LVMi).

Results

Out of 964 cases, 751 (77.9%), 88 (9.1%), 68 (7.1%), and 57 (5.9%) were whites, blacks, Asians, and Hispanics, respectively. At baseline, non-whites and blacks were younger and more likely be female, based in lower socioeconomic areas, not fully insured, diagnosed with functional MR, and affected by biventricular dysfunction. Intra-procedurally, more devices were implanted in blacks. At 1-year, non-whites (vs. whites) and blacks (vs. non-blacks or whites) experienced higher cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (32.9% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.002 and 38.6% vs. 23.4% or 22.5%, p = 0.002 or p = 0.001, respectively), which were accounted for by hospitalizations in the functional MR sub-cohort (n = 494). NYHA class improved less among blacks with functional MR. MR severity and LVMi equally regressed in all groups. White race (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99, p = 0.047) and black race (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.28-3.35, p = 0.003) were independently associated with the primary outcome in functional MR patients only.

Conclusion

Mitral TEER patients of different racial backgrounds exhibit major differences in baseline characteristics. Among those with functional MR, non-whites and blacks also experience a less favorable 1-year clinical outcome.

Disparities in health and healthcare: Impact of race on resource utilization and costs following transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

BACKGROUND

This study sought to investigate health and healthcare disparities in the management of severe mitral regurgitation with transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using MitraClip and how racial differences impact resource utilization and costs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for patients who underwent Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER) using MitraClip between 2016 and 2018. The patients were stratified into four racial cohorts and study outcomes included high resource utilization (HRU), periprocedural complications, and total procedural costs. High resource utilization (HRU) was defined as length of stay (LOS) ≥7 days or a nonhome disposition at discharge. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to determine independent predictors of HRU.

RESULTS

17,100 weighted TEER patients were segregated by race: Caucasian (n = 13,270), others (n = 1510), African Americans, AA (n = 1245) and Hispanics (n = 1075). More African Americans and Hispanics had TEER at Urban facilities (P < 0.001), which were teaching hospitals as well (P < 0.001) but were less likely to be covered by public insurance options -Medicare or Medicaid (P < 0.001). More AA (52.2 %) and Hispanics (27.6 %) were likely to be in the lowest median annual income quartile versus Caucasians (19.2 %) (P = 0.003). AA and Hispanics had higher resource utilization (HRU), prolonged length of stay, nonhome disposition at discharge, higher procedural costs and periprocedural complications versus Caucasians. The logistic regression model revealed acute kidney injury (AKI) and actual procedural costs as independent predictors of HRU in both African American and Hispanic groups.

CONCLUSION

Significant Health and healthcare disparities do exist among underrepresented, racial minority patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in the US. These disparities were associated with higher resource utilization and actual costs in patients with mitral regurgitation treated with TEER.

Socioeconomic Factors and their Impact on Access and Use of Coronary and Structural Interventions

In the past few decades, the accelerated improvement in technology has allowed the development of new and effective coronary and structural heart disease interventions. There has been inequitable patient access to these advanced therapies and significant disparities have affected patients from low socioeconomic positions. In the US, these disparities mostly affect women, black and hispanic communities who are overrepresented in low socioeconomic. Other adverse social determinants of health influenced by structural racism have also contributed to these disparities. In this article, we review the literature on disparities in access and use of coronary and structural interventions; delineate the possible reasons underlying these disparities; and highlight potential solutions at the government, healthcare system, community and individual levels.