Why do guidelines recommend screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, but not for asymptomatic carotid stenosis? A plea for a randomized controlled trial

Prevalence of extracranial carotid artery disease in symptomatic peripheral artery disease and implications for long-term outcome

BACKGROUND

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) still experience excessive rates of fatal cardiovascular events. In this context, the relevance of co-existing extracranial carotid artery disease (ECAD) on outcome in patients with PAD is unclear. Thus, this study elucidates long-term outcome effects of the presence of both atherosclerotic entities for further risk stratification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 669 patients from the Lip-LEAD study with symptomatic PAD (Fontaine stage 2-4) were evaluated for ECAD (internal carotid artery stenosis >50%) with ultrasonography within 6 months after endovascular repair for PAD. Outcome was assessed with a long-term follow-up period with a maximum of 10 years.

RESULTS

Patients presenting with ECAD (n = 245, 36.7%) exhibited worse hemodynamic parameters of PAD than those without (ankle-brachial index (ABI). (0.53 (0.37-0.68) vs. 0.57 (0.47-0.68), p = 0.009; toe-brachial index (TBI) (0.50 (0.36-0.63) vs. 0.55 (0.42-0.70), p = 0.005). Significant correlations between grade of carotid stenosis and ABI as well as TBI were present (r=-0.190, p < 0.001; r=-0.219, p < 0.001). Cox-regression analyses revealed worse outcome in patients with ECAD for both all-cause and cardiovascular (CV)-mortality after multivariable adjustment for traditional CV risk-factors [1.48 (2.02-2.17); 2.10 (1.19-3.69)].

CONCLUSION

Patients with additional ECAD to symptomatic PAD exhibited an unfavourable long-term outcome in comparison to those without. The results suggest that the additional presence of ECAD highlights a highly vulnerable cohort of patients with symptomatic PAD at risk for further fatal CV events and thus should be considered for further diagnostic evaluation and stronger risk modification initiatives.

Stroke risk management in carotid atherosclerotic disease: a clinical consensus statement of the ESC Council on Stroke and the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases

Carotid atherosclerotic disease continues to be an important cause of stroke, often disabling or fatal. Such strokes could be largely prevented through optimal medical therapy and carotid revascularization. Advancements in discovery research and imaging along with evidence from recent pharmacology and interventional clinical trials and registries and the progress in acute stroke management have markedly expanded the knowledge base for clinical decisions in carotid stenosis. Nevertheless, there is variability in carotid-related stroke prevention and management strategies across medical specialities. Optimal patient care can be achieved by (i) establishing a unified knowledge foundation and (ii) fostering multi-specialty collaborative guidelines. The emergent Neuro-Vascular Team concept, mirroring the multi-disciplinary Heart Team, embraces diverse specializations, tailors personalized, stratified medicine approaches to individual patient needs, and integrates innovative imaging and risk-assessment biomarkers. Proposed approach integrates collaboration of multiple specialists central to carotid artery stenosis management such as neurology, stroke medicine, cardiology, angiology, ophthalmology, vascular surgery, endovascular interventions, neuroradiology, and neurosurgery. Moreover, patient education regarding current treatment options, their risks and advantages, is pivotal, promoting patient's active role in clinical care decisions. This enables optimization of interventions ranging from lifestyle modification, carotid revascularization by stenting or endarterectomy, as well as pharmacological management including statins, novel lipid-lowering and antithrombotic strategies, and targeting inflammation and vascular dysfunction. This consensus document provides a harmonized multi-specialty approach to multi-morbidity prevention in carotid stenosis patients, based on comprehensive knowledge review, pinpointing research gaps in an evidence-based medicine approach. It aims to be a foundational tool for inter-disciplinary collaboration and prioritized patient-centric decision-making.

[What is new in the management of peripheral arterial occlusive disease and diseases of the aorta? : Highlights of the ESC guidelines 2024]

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diseases of the aorta published in September 2024 for the first time combine recommendations for both diseases in a joint guideline document. The consolidation of PAD and aorta guidelines follows a holistic approach, which underlines the entirety of the arterial vascular system. This aim is underlined by a specifically introduced recommendation to take the entirety of the circulatory system into account in patients with vascular diseases. The focus in the current ESC guideline document is on a multidisciplinary, patient-centered management of PAD and diseases of the aorta, whereby the prevention and follow-up of patients after therapeutic interventions are emphasized. In PAD the document highlights exercise training and the procedure for patients with chronic wounds as well as risk stratification and hereditary diseases of the aorta.

Impact of carotid stenosis on the outcome of stroke patients submitted to reperfusion treatments: a narrative review

Intravenous thrombolysis (IT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MD) are the two interventional approaches that have changed the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Ipsilateral and contralateral carotid stenosis (ICS, CCS) play an important role in regulating cerebral hemodynamics, both in chronic and acute situations such as AIS. Several studies have explored their role in the incidence and severity of stroke, but very few have investigated the possible impact of ICS and CCS on the efficacy of interventional procedures. The purpose of this review was to I) highlight the incidence and prevalence of carotid stenosis (CS); II) assess the impact of ICS and CCS on cerebral hemodynamics; III) evaluate the effect of carotid stenosis on the efficacy of interventional therapies (IT and MT) for AIS; and IV) report therapeutic complications related to CS. We searched PubMed/Medline for case reports, reviews, and original research articles on English-language review topics during the period from January 1, 2000 to October 1, 2023. CS is associated with 15-20 % of the total number of AIS. ICS and CCS had a negative influence on both cerebral hemodynamics before AIS and outcome after interventional procedures (IT, MT alone or in bridging). Available data on cerebral hemodynamics and efficacy of interventional therapies for AIS suggest a negative role of CS. Therefore, early diagnosis of CS may be considered relevant to preventive and post-stroke treatment strategies.

Why selective screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is currently appropriate: a special report

INTRODUCTION

Two of the main reasons recent guidelines do not recommend routine population-wide screening programs for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS) is that screening could lead to an increase of carotid revascularization procedures and that such mass screening programs may not be cost-effective. Nevertheless, selective screening for AsxCS could have several benefits. This article presents the rationale for such a program.

AREAS COVERED

The benefits of selective screening for AsxCS include early recognition of AsxCS allowing timely initiation of preventive measures to reduce future myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiac death and cardiovascular (CV) event rates.

EXPERT OPINION

Mass screening programs for AsxCS are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. Nevertheless, targeted screening of populations at high risk for AsxCS provides an opportunity to identify these individuals earlier rather than later and to initiate a number of lifestyle measures, risk factor modifications, and intensive medical therapy in order to prevent future strokes and CV events. For patients at 'higher risk of stroke' on best medical treatment, a prophylactic carotid intervention may be considered.

Common Carotid Artery Stenosis Degree as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Disease in a General Population: The Suita Study

BACKGROUND

The utility of screening for the degree of common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis as a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a general population remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 4775 Japanese men and women whose CCA was measured using bilateral carotid ultrasonography at baseline (April 1994-August 2001). We calculated the degree of stenosis as a percentage of the stenotic area of the lumen in the cross-section perpendicular to the long axis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for incident CVD and its subtypes according to the degree of CCA stenosis. During the median 14.2 years of follow-up, 385 incident CVD events (159 coronary heart disease and 226 stroke) were documented. The degree of CCA stenosis was associated with increased risks of incident CVD, coronary heart disease, and stroke, with multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for <25%, 25%-49%, and ≥50% stenosis with plaque compared with no CCA plaque of 1.37 (1.07-1.76), 1.72 (1.23-2.40), and 2.49 (1.69-3.67), respectively. Adding the CCA stenosis degree to traditional CVD risk factors increased Harrell's C statistics (0.772 [95% CI, 0.751-0.794] to 0.778 [95% CI, 0.758-0.799]; P=0.04) and improved the 10-year risk prediction ability (integrated discrimination improvement, 0.0129 [95% CI, 0.0078-0.0179]; P<0.001; continuous net reclassification improvement, 0.1598 [95% CI, 0.0297-0.2881]; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of CCA stenosis may be used as a predictive marker for the development of CVD in the general population.

Detection rates of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and atrial fibrillation by selective screening of patients without cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Individuals with significant asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) could benefit from specific interventions to prevent heart attack and stroke, but are often clinically 'silent'. We aimed to determine detection rate of ACAS and AF by screening, targeting a population at increased cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

Data on adults who attended voluntary and self-funded commercial screening clinics in the United States or the United Kingdom between 2008 and 2013 were used. The Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk equation was applied to each participants and detection rates of targeted screening for ≥50% ACAS and AF to those at highest risk of CVD was assessed.

RESULTS

Among 0.4 million individuals between 40 and 80 years, without CVD, 6191 (1.6%) had ACAS and 1026 (0.3%) had AF. Selective screening of participants with a predicted 10-year CVD risk of ≥20% identified 40% of ACAS cases, a prevalence of 3.7%, leading to a number needed to screen (NNS) of 27, as well as 39% of AF cases, a prevalence of 0.6%, with a NNS of 170. Selective screening of those with a predicted 10-year CVD risk of ≥15% identified 54% of ACAS cases, a prevalence of 3.3%, and an NNS of 31, as well as 51% of AF cases, a prevalence of 0.5%, with an NNS of 195.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective screening for ACAS and AF implemented in ASCVD risk assessment greatly reduces the NNS when compared with population-level screening with detection rates of ACAS and AF substantially greater in people at higher predicted CVD risk.