Prognosis of patients with active cancer undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An insight from Japanese multicenter registry

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Implications of TAVR in Patients With Active Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, the clinical outcomes and prognostic implications of TAVR in patients with active cancer remain uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluates procedural success, complications, and survival outcomes of TAVR in patients with and without active cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 18.0.

RESULTS

The results of the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between cancer and non-cancer patients (OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.65; p = 0.27). Similarly, 30-day mortality did not differ between the two groups (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.19; p = 0.49). However, 1-year mortality was significantly higher in cancer patients (OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.45, 2.56; p < 0.01). Two-year mortality was also higher in cancer patients (OR = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.79, 3.93; p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in major bleeding, acute kidney injury, stroke, or permanent pacemaker implantation between the groups.

CONCLUSION

While TAVR offers comparable in-hospital and short-term survival outcomes for cancer and non-cancer patients, long-term mortality is significantly higher in those with active cancer. These findings suggest that TAVR is a viable option for cancer patients with severe AS but requires careful long-term prognostic considerations. Further studies are needed to optimize management strategies for this complex population.

Outcomes of patients with active cancer after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with active cancer and aortic stenosis may be under-referred for valve interventions due to concerns over a prohibitive risk. However, whether active cancer impacts outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unknown.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in December 2023 for studies comparing the post-TAVR outcomes of patients with versus without active cancer. We pooled odds ratios (OR) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) applying a random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed in R version 4.3.2.

RESULTS

We included nine observational studies analyzing 133,906 patients, of whom 9,792 (7.3%) had active cancer. Compared with patients without cancer, patients with active cancer had higher short- (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.15-1.55; p < 0.001) and long-term mortality (OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.80-2.91; p < 0.001) rates, not driven by cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.70-2.40; p = 0.40), and higher major bleeding rates (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.15-2.42; p = 0.008). The higher mortality rate was sustained in an adjusted analysis (aHR 1.77; 95% CI 1.34-2.35; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cardiac, renal, and cerebral complications at a follow-up ranging from 180 days to 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Patients with active cancer undergoing TAVR had higher non-cardiovascular mortality and bleeding rates, with comparable incidences of other complications. This highlights the need for a shared decision and appropriate patient selection considering cancer type, staging, bleeding risk, and optimal timing for intervention.

Impact of cancer in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Owing to the minimally invasive nature of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), TAVR seems to be preferred in patients with cancer; however, related research on the clinical efficacy and safety of TAVR in patients with cancer and severe aortic stenosis is limited, and conclusions are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with cancer who underwent TAVR.

Method and results

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with and without cancer who underwent TAVR. We systematically reviewed and analyzed 15 studies (195,658 patients) published in PubMed and Cochrane Library databases between January 2022 and January 2023. The primary outcomes were short-term (in-hospital or 30-day) and long-term (≥12 months) mortality. The prevalence of current or previous cancer in the patients undergoing TAVR was 19.8 % (38,695 patients). Patients with cancer had a lower risk of short-term mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.77, P < 0.001) but a higher risk of long-term mortality (OR 1.54, 95 % CI 1.35-1.76, P < 0.001) than those without cancer. Patients with cancer had a lower incidence of postprocedural stroke and acute kidney injury but a higher incidence of pacemaker implantation than patients without cancer.

Conclusions

Patients with cancer undergoing TAVR have a good short-term prognosis and acceptable perioperative complications compared with patients without cancer. However, the long-term outcomes are contingent on cancer survival.

Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a VARC-HBR consensus document

The identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are of major importance, but the lack of standardised definitions is challenging for trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Valve Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (VARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organisations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from Europe, the USA, and Asia, with a major focus on TAVI-related bleeding. VARC-HBR is an initiative of the CERC (Cardiovascular European Research Center), aiming to develop a consensus definition of TAVI patients at HBR, based on a systematic review of the available evidence, to provide consistency for future clinical trials, clinical decision-making, and regulatory review. This document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of HBR evaluating the safety and effectiveness of procedures, devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing TAVI..

Predictors for all-cause mortality in men after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A report from the LAPLACE-TAVI registry

Background

Information regarding the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in men is limited. This study aimed to investigate short- to mid-term outcomes and prognostic predictors in this population.

Method and Results

The data of 519 men were analyzed from 1,693 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at six hospitals between April 2010 and July 2020. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days after TAVR. The mean age and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score were 83.7 ± 5.9 years and 6.3 ± 4.7%, respectively. Overall, 23.5% of patients consumed alcohol with a frequency of > 1 drinks/week, and 12.1% consumed alcohol with a frequency of > 8 drinks/week, while 66.1% were former smokers and 4.2% were current smokers. Mortality at 30 days was 0.8%. During the median follow-up period of 448 days, the estimated survival rates at 1 year post-TAVR was 90.7 ± 1.4%. In multivariate analysis, the serum albumin level [hazard ratio (HR): 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.36-3.62, p = 0.001], atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.13-2.82, p = 0.012), and STS score (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06-1.67, p = 0.015) were independently associated with all-cause mortality following TAVR. Adjusted hazard ratios of current smoking, heavy drinking, and presence of cancer were 1.05 (95% CI: 0.36-2.98),1.37 (95% CI: 0.75-2.48), and 1.13 (95% CI: 0.75-2.48), respectively.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that serum albumin levels, atrial fibrillation, and STS score were independently associated with all-cause mortality following TAVR in men.

Transcatheter aortic valve intervention in patients with cancer

The prevalence of concurrent cancer and severe aortic stenosis (AS) is increasing due to an ageing population. In addition to shared traditional risk factors for AS and cancer, patients with cancer may be at increased risk for AS due to off-target effects of cancer-related therapy, such as mediastinal radiation therapy (XRT), as well as shared non-traditional pathophysiological mechanisms. Compared with surgical aortic valve replacement, major adverse events are generally lower in patients with cancer undergoing transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI), especially in those with history of mediastinal XRT. Similar procedural and short-to-intermediate TAVI outcomes have been observed in patients with cancer as compared with no cancer, whereas long-term outcomes are dependent on cancer survival. Considerable heterogeneity exists between cancer subtypes and stage, with worse outcomes observed in those with active and advanced-stage disease as well as specific cancer subtypes. Procedural management in patients with cancer poses unique challenges and thus requires periprocedural expertise and close collaboration with the referring oncology team. The decision to ultimately pursue TAVI involves a multidisciplinary and holistic approach in assessing the appropriateness of intervention. Further clinical trial and registry studies are needed to better appreciate outcomes in this population.

Favorable Prognosis in Patients with Recovered Pulmonary Hypertension after TAVI: An Analysis of the LAPLACE-TAVI Registry

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of aortic stenosis (AS). Despite the established association between PH and poor outcomes in patients with AS, the prognostic implication of a change in PH after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been rarely evaluated. This study analyzed a prospective multi-center TAVI registry database involving six Japanese centers and used the transtricuspid pressure gradient (TRPG) obtained by echocardiography to estimate pulmonary artery systolic pressure. The participants (n = 2056) were first divided into two groups by TRPG before TAVI, a PH (−) group (TRPG < 30 mmHg) (n = 1407, 61.9%) and a PH (+) group (TRPG ≥ 30 mmHg) (n = 649, 28.6%). Next, by TRPG after (4.1 ± 5.3 days) TAVI, the PH (+) group was further subdivided into two groups, Recovered PH (TRPG < 30 mmHg, n = 253) and Persistent PH (TRPG after TAVI ≥ 30 mmHg, n = 396). The median follow-up duration was 1.8 years. The primary and secondary endpoints were the composite and each of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure hospitalization, respectively. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates with log-rank comparisons showed significantly higher cumulative incidences of primary and secondary endpoints in the Persistent PH group compared to other groups. Moreover, adjusted multivariate Cox-proportional hazard analyses showed that a decreased (−10 mmHg) TRPG after TAVI was linearly associated with a reduced risk of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR): 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64−0.90, p = 0.0020). The findings in the present study indicate that the recovery of PH may partly contributes to the prognostic benefit of TAVI procedure in patients with AS and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure.