Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in heart failure: Past, present and future perspectives

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist versus Placebo in a Patient With End-Stage Kidney Disease Under Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT

The number of patients living with chronic kidney diseases is increasing, and so are the patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing renal replacement therapy. Although there is a common understanding that these patients face higher risks of fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been an essential pillar in managing heart failure, their use in this subset of patients has been overshadowed because of concerns of hyperkalemia. Patients with ESRD under renal replacement therapy have often been excluded from landmark trials. This meta-analysis was conducted based on the PRISMA guideline after registering the protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42024499835). A database search included articles until April 2024, and relevant data were extracted from the included studies. Analysis was done using RevMan web (version 5.4). A total of 15 studies among 1086 studies were included in the final analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed MRA significantly reduced all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.35, confidence interval (CI), 0.23-0.54) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.37, 0.21-0.65). With some possible increase in the risk of hyperkalemia (OR 1.56, CI, 1.01-2.42), with no discernible difference in the occurrence of stroke (OR 0.57, CI, 0.25-1.28) or myocardial infarction (OR 0.63, CI, 0.08-4.72). The utilization of MRA in patients with ESRD under dialysis is linked to improved mortality outcomes, albeit with slight concerns for hyperkalemia. Although current evidence leans toward MRA usage, prospective randomized controlled trials involving a broader patient cohort are essential to establish robust guidance for MRA application in this subset of patients.

The Role of Esaxerenone in the Continuum of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From a Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) presents significant therapeutic challenges, particularly exacerbated by comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. The modulation of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System is critical in managing HFpEF progression. Esaxerenone (ESAX), a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, may offer benefits in managing HFpEF continuum due to its unique mechanism.

METHODS

Conducted at Odawara Municipal Hospital, this single-center, prospective, observational study involved hypertensive adult outpatients diagnosed with either type 2 diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease. Patients were categorized into HFpEF and pre-HFpEF groups based on established criteria. The study primarily assessed changes in blood pressure and cardiac function (through NT-proBNP levels and echocardiography), along with secondary outcomes including aortic stiffness and oxidative stress over a 24-week period.

RESULTS

Both HFpEF and pre-HFpEF patients exhibited significant reductions in blood pressure, with no significant differences between the patients. HFpEF patients experienced decreases in NT-proBNP levels and oxidative stress similar to those in pre-HFpEF patients. Notably, pre-HFpEF patients demonstrated more pronounced improvements in cardiac function, particularly in the E/e' ratio and global longitudinal strain, compared to HFpEF patients. Additionally, 30% of pre-HFpEF patients had improved to stage A, suggesting potential for early intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

ESAX appears to be effective in managing the heart failure continuum, particularly benefiting pre-HFpEF patients. Its impacts suggest the potential benefits of early intervention in decelerating disease progression and potentially preventing the new onset of HFpEF, highlighting the importance of targeted therapies at early stages of heart failure.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients aged 80 years and over with heart failure: Need for better treatment

AIMS

Although the prevalence of heart failure (HF) increases markedly with advancing age, surprisingly little is known about HF in the very elderly. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Individual participant meta-analysis of patients with HF and reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF, respectively) enrolled in eight large randomized trials. Overall, the proportion of octogenarians was 1518 of 20 168 patients (7.5%) with HFrEF, 610 of 4609 (13.2%) with HFmrEF, and 3130 of 15 354 (20.4%) with HFpEF. Regardless of HF phenotype, octogenarian patients were more often female and had more comorbidities, more symptoms and signs of congestion, and worse health status (but not quality of life), in comparison to patients aged <80 years. The incidence (per 100 person-years) of the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization was 13.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.7-14.0) in octogenarians versus 9.5 (95% CI 9.3-9.7) in non-octogenarians (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.32-1.48). Each component of the composite was more frequent in octogenarians with rates of cardiovascular mortality of 7.0 (95% CI 6.5-7.4) per 100 person-years versus 4.9 (95% CI 4.8-5.1) in non-octogenarians (aHR 1.60, 95% CI 1.48-1.72, p < 0.001). Octogenarians received less evidence-based therapy, especially mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, than younger patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite worse health status and higher hospitalization and mortality rates, octogenarians were undertreated compared to younger patients.

Beyond Quadruple Therapy and Current Therapeutic Strategies in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Medical Therapies with Potential to Become Part of the Therapeutic Armamentarium

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a complex clinical syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality and seems to be responsible for approximately 50% of heart failure cases and hospitalizations worldwide. First-line treatments of patients with HFrEF, according to the ESC and AHA guidelines, include β-blockers, angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. This quadruple therapy should be initiated during hospital stay and uptitrated to maximum doses within 6 weeks after discharge according to large multicenter controlled trials. Quadruple therapy improves survival by approximately 8 years for a 55-year-old heart failure patient. Additional therapeutic strategies targeting other signaling pathways such as ivabradine, digoxin, and isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine combination for African Americans, as well as adjunctive symptomatic therapies, seem to be necessary in the management of HFrEF. Although second-line medications have not achieved improvements in mortality, they seem to decrease heart failure hospitalizations. There are novel medical therapies including vericiguat, omecamtiv mecarbil, genetic and cellular therapies, and mitochondria-targeted therapies. Moreover, mitraclip for significant mitral valve regurgitation, ablation in specific atrial fibrillation cases, omecamtiv mecarbil are options under evaluation in clinical trials. Finally, the HeartMate 3 magnetically levitated centrifugal left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has extended 5-year survival for stage D HF patients who are candidates for an LVAD.

Outcomes With Finerenone in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes by Baseline Insulin Resistance

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether insulin resistance, assessed by estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), is associated with cardiorenal risk and whether it modifies finerenone efficacy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In FIDELITY (N = 13,026), patients with type 2 diabetes, either 1) urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of ≥30 to <300 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥25 to ≤90 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 2) UACR of ≥300 to ≤5,000 mg/g and eGFR of ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m2, who also received optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade, were randomized to finerenone or placebo. Outcomes included cardiovascular (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and kidney (kidney failure, sustained decrease of ≥57% in eGFR from baseline, or renal death) composites. eGDR was calculated using waist circumference, hypertension status, and glycated hemoglobin for 12,964 patients.

RESULTS

Median eGDR was 4.1 mg/kg/min. eGDR

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin resistance was associated with increased cardiovascular (but not kidney) risk and did not modify finerenone efficacy.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications
• Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy
• Insulin Resistance
• Double-Blind Method
• Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications
• Glucose/therapeutic use
• Insulins/therapeutic use
• Naphthyridines

Collapse

Grants

• P30 DK111024 NIDDK NIH HHS
• Bayer

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Thomas Ebert Medical Department III – Endocrinology, Nephrology, Rheumatology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
Stefan D. Anker Department of Cardiology of German Heart Center Charité; Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
Luis M. Ruilope Cardiorenal Translational Laboratory and Hypertension Unit, Institute of Research imas12, Madrid, Spain CIBER-CV, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain Faculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Paola Fioretto Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Italy
Vivian Fonseca Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
Guillermo E. Umpierrez Division of Endocrinology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Andreas L. Birkenfeld Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, University Clinic, Tübingen, Germany Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases, Helmholtz Center Munich, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany
Robert Lawatscheck Clinical Research, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
Charlie Scott Data Science and Analytics, Bayer PLC, Reading, U.K
Katja Rohwedder Medical Affairs, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
Peter Rossing Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD Investigators

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Impact of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in the Treatment of Heart Failure: Targeting the Heart Failure Cascade

Epidemiological data from the Indian subcontinent on the burden of Heart failure (HF) is scarce. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are usually used in the management of HF and hypertension. A consortium of experts reviewed and opined on the pathophysiological role of aldosterone in HF and its cascading effects on the heart in terms of cardiac fibrosis, cardiac hypertrophy, and remodeling, increased propensity to cause arrhythmias in addition to its effect on sodium and water retention. This expert opinion document highlights the various mechanisms of action of MRAs. It provides clinical experience and practice-based expert opinion on the use of spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with HF. The role of MRAs in diabetic patients with HF has also been profiled.

Heart-Rate Variability Correlates to Choroidal Thickness in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Purpose

Patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) have previously been shown to have a lower heart rate variability (HRV), implying a lower vagal tone. Vagal tone alters mineralocorticoids, which in turn affect the thickness of the choroid. Since increased choroidal thickness is characteristic of CSC, we wanted to investigate its correlation with HRV.

Patients and Methods

In this case-control study, 21 acute CSC patients and 31 healthy controls were included. Diagnosis was confirmed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and retinal examination. HRV was evaluated following accepted standards. Outcome measures were chosen beforehand as follows: Standard deviation of N-N intervals (SDNN), root mean square of successive differences (RMSDD), low frequency/high frequency ratio (LF/HF ratio), and standard deviation ratio from commonly used Poincare plot (SD2/SD1 ratio). Choroidal thickness was measured using OCT directly under the foveola.

Results

Patients and healthy controls did not differ in health and medical characteristics in addition to CSC disease. Choroidal thickness was greatest in patients with CSC (mean±SD: 342±80 μm) compared to controls (235±60 μm, p<0.0001). A correlation was observed between LF/HF ratio and choroidal thickness in patients with CSC (Pearson correlation 0.63, p=0.02), where the CSC group had a lower LF/HF ratio (Median 2.39 ms2, IQR: 1.2-4.34 ms2) compared to controls (Median 1.2 ms2, IQR: 0.9-2.4 ms2, p=0.06) and SD2/SD1 ratio (CSC 0.59±0.2 vs controls 0.74±0.3, p=0.06).

Conclusion

We found a correlation between the thickness of the choroid and the HRV-measured LF/HF ratio in patients with CSC and showed a borderline significant reduction in HRV measurements in patients with CSC. The data imply that vagal alterations exist in patients with CSC. Due to the low n, this should be considered as a pilot study. Further studies are warranted to elucidate mechanisms and validate findings.

Mechanisms of current therapeutic strategies for heart failure: more questions than answers?

Heart failure (HF) is a complex, multifactorial and heterogeneous syndrome with substantial mortality and morbidity. Over the last few decades, numerous attempts have been made to develop targeted therapies that may attenuate the known pathophysiological pathways responsible for causing the progression of HF. However, therapies developed with this objective have sometimes failed to show benefit. The pathophysiological construct of HF with numerous aetiologies suggests that interventions with broad mechanisms of action which simultaneously target more than one pathway maybe more effective in improving the outcomes of patients with HF. Indeed, current therapeutics with clinical benefits in HF have targeted a wider range of intermediate phenotypes. Despite extensive scientific breakthroughs in HF research recently, questions persist regarding the ideal therapeutic targets which may help achieve maximum benefit. In this review, we evaluate the mechanism of action of current therapeutic strategies, the pathophysiological pathways they target and highlight remaining knowledge gaps regarding the mode of action of these interventions.

Diuretics in the management of chronic heart failure: when and how

Heart failure is an increasingly prevalent condition resulting in recurrent hospitalisations and significant mortality and morbidity. The management of heart failure has evolved, and multiple drugs have an established mortality benefit in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Although the focus should be on ensuring that patients are treated with the maximum tolerated doses of these guideline-directed therapies, diuretics continue to play a key role in the management of clinical congestion in all forms of heart failure. Clinicians play a key role in heart failure management. Familiarity with the role of diuretics and their dosing and monitoring is critical.

Evaluation of the prescribing practice of guideline-directed medical therapy among ambulatory chronic heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated that heart failure (HF) patients who receive direct pharmacist input as part of multidisciplinary care have better clinical outcomes. This study evaluated/compared the difference in prescribing practices of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for chronic HF patients between two multidisciplinary clinics-with and without the direct involvement of a pharmacist.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of chronic HF patients, presenting to two multidisciplinary outpatient clinics between March 2005 and January 2017, was performed; a Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Consulting Service (MACS) with an integrated pharmacist model of care and a General Cardiology Heart Failure Service (GCHFS) clinic, without the active involvement of a pharmacist.

RESULTS

MACS clinic patients were significantly older (80 vs. 73 years, p < .001), more likely to be female (p < .001), and had significantly higher systolic (123 vs. 112 mmHg, p < .001) and diastolic (67 vs. 60 mmHg, p < .05) blood pressures compared to the GCHF clinic patients. Moreover, the MACS clinic patients showed more polypharmacy and higher prevalence of multiple comorbidities. Both clinics had similar prescribing rates of GDMT and achieved maximal tolerated doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in HFrEF. However, HFpEF patients in the MACS clinic were significantly more likely to be prescribed ACEIs/ARBs (70.5% vs. 56.2%, p = 0.0314) than the GCHFS patients. Patients with both HFrEF and HFpEF (MACS clinic) were significantly less likely to be prescribed β-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Use of digoxin in chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) in MACS clinic was significantly higher in HFrEF patients (82.5% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.004), but the number of people anticoagulated in presence of AF (27.1% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.002) and prescribed diuretics (84.0% vs. 94.5%, p = 0.022) were significantly lower in HFpEF patients attending the MACS clinic. Age, heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), anemia, chronic renal failure, and other comorbidities were the main significant predictors of utilization of GDMT in a multivariate binary logistic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower prescription rates of some medications in the pharmacist-involved multidisciplinary team were found. Careful consideration of demographic and clinical characteristics, contraindications for use of medications, polypharmacy, and underlying comorbidities is necessary to achieve best practice.

Impact of Left Ventricular Function and Heart Failure Symptoms on Outcomes Post Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: CASTLE-AF Trial

BACKGROUND

Recent data demonstrate promising effects on left ventricular dysfunction and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement following ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure. We sought to study the relationship between LVEF, New York Heart Association class on presentation, and the end points of mortality and heart failure admissions in the CASTLE-AF study (Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure) population. Furthermore, predictors for LVEF improvement were examined.

METHODS

The CASTLE-AF patients with coexisting heart failure and AF (n=363) were randomized in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to ablation (n=179) versus pharmacological therapy (n=184). Left ventricular function and New York Heart Association class were assessed at baseline (after randomization) and at each follow-up visit.

RESULTS

In the ablation arm, a significantly higher number of patients experienced an improvement in their LVEF to >35% at the end of the study (odds ratio, 2.17; P<0.001). Compared with the pharmacological therapy arm, both ablation patient groups with severe (<20%) or moderate/severe (≥20% and <35%) baseline LVEF had a significantly lower number of composite end points (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; P=0.006), all-cause mortality (HR, 0.54; P=0.019), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (HR, 0.66; P=0.017). In the ablation group, New York Heart Association I/II patients at the time of treatment had the strongest improvement in clinical outcomes (primary end point: HR, 0.43; P<0.001; mortality: HR, 0.30; P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with pharmacological treatment, AF ablation was associated with a significant improvement in LVEF, independent from the severity of left ventricular dysfunction. AF ablation should be performed at early stages of the patient's heart failure symptoms.

Management protocols for chronic heart failure in India

Heart failure is a common clinical syndrome and a global health priority. The burden of heart failure is increasing at an alarming rate worldwide as well as in India. Heart failure not only increases the risk of mortality, morbidity and worsens the patient's quality of life, but also puts a huge burden on the overall healthcare system. The management of heart failure has evolved over the years with the advent of new drugs and devices. This document has been developed with an objective to provide standard management guidance and simple heart failure algorithms to aid Indian clinicians in their daily practice. It would also inform the clinicians on the latest evidence in heart failure and provide guidance to recognize and diagnose chronic heart failure early and optimize management.