Developmental differences in peripheral glabrous skin mechanosensory nerve receptive field and intracellular electrophysiologic properties: phenotypic characterization in infant and juvenile rats

Recovery from nerve injury induced behavioral hypersensitivity in rats parallels resolution of abnormal primary sensory afferent signaling

Pain and hypersensitivity months after peripheral injury reflect abnormal input from peripheral afferents likely in conjunction with central sensitization. We hypothesize that peripheral changes occur in defined sensory afferents and resolve as behavioral response to injury resolves. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent sham or partial L5 spinal nerve ligation, and paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) was sequentially measured during recovery. At 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after injury, randomized animals underwent electrophysiologic assessment of L4 fast-conducting high- and low-threshold mechanoreceptors, and individual neuronal mechanical thresholds (MTs) were contrasted with PWTs in the same animals. Paw withdrawal thresholds decreased after injury and resolved over time (P < 0.001). Similarly, MTs of fast-conducting high-threshold mechanoreceptors decreased after injury and resolved over time (P < 0.001). By contrast, MTs of low-threshold mechanoreceptors increased after injury and resolved over time (P < 0.001). Distributions of recordings from each afferent subtype were perturbed after injury, and this too resolved over time. After resolution of behavioral changes, several electrical abnormalities persisted in both neuronal subtypes. These data extend previous findings that mechanically sensitive nociceptors are sensitized, whereas tactile, largely Aβ afferents are desensitized after nerve injury by showing that the time course of resolution of these changes mirrors that of behavioral hypersensitivity in a surgical injury including neural damage. These data support a role of abnormal peripheral input, from both nociceptor and tactile afferents, during recovery from peripheral injury and underscore the potential importance of both classes of afferents as potential targets for pain treatment.

Systemic growth hormone deficiency causes mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity during early postnatal development

•

Systemic GHD causes behavioral hypersensitivity at P7 and P14, but not P21.

•

Primary afferent sensitization is observed in GHRHr KOs.

•

Knockout of GHRHr changes DRG gene expression that is observed throughout development.

Injury during early postnatal life causes acute alterations in afferent function and DRG gene expression, which in addition to producing short-term sensitivity has the potential to influence nociceptive responses in adulthood. We recently discovered that growth hormone (GH) is a key regulator of afferent sensitization and pain-related behaviors during developmental inflammation of the skin. Peripheral injury caused a significant reduction in cutaneous GH levels, which corresponded with the observed hypersensitivity. However, it has yet to be determined whether GH deficiency (GHD) is sufficient to drive peripheral sensitization in uninjured animals. Here, we found that systemic GHD, induced by knockout of the GH release hormone receptor (GHRHr), was able to induce behavioral and afferent hypersensitivity to peripheral stimuli specifically during early developmental stages. GHD also produced an upregulation of many receptors and channels linked to nociceptive processing in the DRGs at these early postnatal ages (P7 and P14). Surprisingly, P21 GHRHr knockouts also displayed significant alterations in DRG gene expression even though behavioral and afferent hypersensitivity resolved. These data support previous findings that GH is a key modulator of neonatal hypersensitivity. Results may provide insight into whether GH treatment may be a therapeutic strategy for pediatric pain.

Post-discharge hyperpolarization is an endogenous modulatory factor limiting input from fast-conducting nociceptors (AHTMRs)

Peripheral somatosensory neurons are frequently exposed to mechanical forces. Strong stimuli result in neuronal activation of high-threshold mechanosensory afferent neurons, even in the absence of tissue damage. Among these neurons, fast-conducting nociceptors (A-fiber high-threshold mechanoreceptors (AHTMRs)) are normally resistant to sustained activation, transiently encoding the mechanical stimulus intensity but not its full duration. This rapidly adapting response seems to depend on changes in the electrical excitability of the membrane of these afferent neurons during sustained stimulation, a restraint mechanism that disappears following sensitization. Here, we examine the mechanism by which strong peripheral activation of mechanoreceptors elicits this control process in the absence of tissue injury and temporally silences afferent neurons despite ongoing stimulation. To study this, mechanoreceptors in Sprague-Dawley rats were accessed at the soma in the dorsal root ganglia from T11 and L4/L5. Neuronal classification was performed using receptive field characteristics and passive and active electrical properties. Sustained mechanical nociceptive stimulation in the absence of tissue damage of AHTMRs induces a rapid membrane hyperpolarization and a period of reduced responsiveness to the stimuli. Moreover, this phenomenon appears to be unique to this subset of afferent neurons and is absent in slow-conducting C-mechanonociceptors (C-fiber high-threshold mechanoreceptors) and rapidly adapting fast-conducting low-threshold mechanoreceptors. Furthermore, this mechanism for rapid adaptation and reducing ongoing input is ablated by repeated strong stimuli and in sensitized AHTMRs after chronic neuropathic injury. Further studies to understand the underling molecular mechanisms behind this phenomenon and their modulation during the development of pathological conditions may provide new targets to control nociceptive hyperexcitability and chronic pain.

Nerve injury induced activation of fast-conducting high threshold mechanoreceptors predicts non-reflexive pain related behavior

The role of specific subsets of peripheral nerves in pain related behavior remains unclear. To better understand the contribution of differential activation of fast-conducting, high-threshold mechanoreceptor (AHTMR) input, we hypothesized that neuronal activation would be distinct with nerve injury, and that nociceptive input would predictt behavior in the freely exploring animal. A series of surfaces was used to deliver mechanical input to the hindpaws of rats upon voluntary movement and exploration. Neuronal activation increased as apex surface decreased (0.2, 0.6, 1.0 and 1.5mm) using in vivo recording in L4 DRG neurons, and this relationship was enhanced following partial ligation of L5 (pSNL). In behaving animals, apex size was correlated to time spent on each surface following pSNL, but not with sham. Morphine normalized the discriminatory behavior following pSNL. These data indicate that noxious mechanical activation of AHTMR upon normal movement predicts behavior using paradigms that do not rely on reflexive withdrawal responses suggesting that AHTMR activation and central nervous system input contribute to higher order pain behavior after nerve injury beyond the immediate early pain input long attributed to these neurons.

Nerve injury induces a new profile of tactile and mechanical nociceptor input from undamaged peripheral afferents

Chronic pain after nerve injury is often accompanied by hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli, yet whether this reflects altered input, altered processing, or both remains unclear. Spinal nerve ligation or transection results in hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli in skin innervated by adjacent dorsal root ganglia, but no previous study has quantified the changes in receptive field properties of these neurons in vivo. To address this, we recorded intracellularly from L4 dorsal root ganglion neurons of anesthetized young adult rats, 1 wk after L5 partial spinal nerve ligation (pSNL) or sham surgery. One week after pSNL, hindpaw mechanical withdrawal threshold in awake, freely behaving animals was decreased in the L4 distribution on the nerve-injured side compared with sham controls. Electrophysiology revealed that high-threshold mechanoreceptive cells of A-fiber conduction velocity in L4 were sensitized, with a seven-fold reduction in mechanical threshold, a seven-fold increase in receptive field area, and doubling of maximum instantaneous frequency in response to peripheral stimuli, accompanied by reductions in after-hyperpolarization amplitude and duration. Only a reduction in mechanical threshold (minimum von Frey hair producing neuronal activity) was observed in C-fiber conduction velocity high-threshold mechanoreceptive cells. In contrast, low-threshold mechanoreceptive cells were desensitized, with a 13-fold increase in mechanical threshold, a 60% reduction in receptive field area, and a 40% reduction in instantaneous frequency to stimulation. No spontaneous activity was observed in L4 ganglia, and the likelihood of recording from neurons without a mechanical receptive field was increased after pSNL. These data suggest massively altered input from undamaged sensory afferents innervating areas of hypersensitivity after nerve injury, with reduced tactile and increased nociceptive afferent response. These findings differ importantly from previous preclinical studies, but are consistent with clinical findings in most patients with chronic neuropathic pain.

Relationship between electrophysiological signature and defined sensory modality of trigeminal ganglion neurons in vivo

The trigeminal ganglia (TG) innervate a heterogeneous set of highly sensitive and exposed tissues. Weak, innocuous stimuli can evoke pain as a normal response in some areas such as the cornea. This observation implies, however, the capability of low-threshold mechanoreceptors, inducing pain in the normal condition. To clarify this matter, the present study correlates the electrical signature (both fiber conduction velocity and somatic electrical properties) with receptor field, mechanical threshold, and temperature responsiveness of sensory afferents innervating tissues with dissimilar sensitivity (skin vs. cornea) in the trigeminal domain. Intracellular recordings were obtained in vivo from 148 neurons of the left TG of 62 mice. In 111 of these neurons, the peripheral receptor field was successfully localized: 96 of them innervated the hairy skin, while the remaining 15 innervated the cornea. The electrical signature was defined and peripheral responses correlated with tissue target. No high threshold neurons were found in the cornea. Moreover, the electrical signature of corneal afferents resembles nociceptive neurons in the skin. TG skin afferents showed similar membrane electrical signature and sensory modality as skin afferents from dorsal root ganglion, although TG afferents exhibited a shorter duration of afterhyperpolarization then those previously described in dorsal root ganglion. These data suggest than new or different ways to classify and study TG sensory neurons may be required.

Skin incision-induced receptive field responses of mechanosensitive peripheral neurons are developmentally regulated in the rat

Maturation of the nervous system results in changes in both central and peripheral processing. To better understand responses to injury in the young, developmental differences in the acute response to incision were investigated in both tactile and nociceptive myelinated peripheral mechanosensitive afferent neurons in vivo. Neuronal intrasomal recordings were performed in juvenile and infant rats in 34 L5 dorsal root ganglia, and each neuron was phenotypically defined. Neurons had a mechanosensitive receptive field in the glabrous skin on the plantar surface of the hind paw, which was characterized at baseline and for up to 45 min after incision. Fundamental maturational differences in the effect of incision were clear: in high-threshold nociceptive mechanoreceptors, the mechanical threshold decreased immediately and the receptive field size increased rapidly in juvenile rats but not in infant rats. Additionally, a divergence in changes in the instantaneous response frequency of tactile afferents occurred between the two ages. These differences may help explain maturational differences in responses to peripheral injury and suggest that differences in central nervous system responses may be partially mitigated by spatially confined and frequency-dependent differences resulting from tactile and nociceptive mechanosensitive input.