The effectiveness of combined abdominal myomectomy and uterine artery embolization

Uterine Artery Embolization Before Myomectomy: Is It Worth the Trouble?

OBJECTIVES

This study compared patients who underwent myomectomy with preoperative uterine artery embolization (UAE) to those who underwent surgery without UAE. The primary objective was to analyze whether preoperative embolization reduces perioperative blood loss and other related complications. The secondary objective was to analyze the long-term outcomes of the 2 techniques in terms of fertility and obstetrical complications.

DESIGN

Observational cohort retrospective study approved by the Brugmann University Hospital's ethics committee (CE2023/79).

SETTING

The department of gynecology database was used to extract all myomectomy cases between January 2011 and December 2021. Hysteroscopic myomectomies were excluded.

PATIENTS

192 patients were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The population was divided according to the presence or absence of preoperative UAE. The UAE and myomectomy group comprised 95 cases between 2011 and 2020, while the myomectomy-only group consisted of 97 cases between 2014 and 2021.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Blood loss was significantly lower when preoperative UAE was performed (175.9 [308.5] mL versus 623.3 [697.5] mL, p-value <.0001). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative haemoglobin, blood transfusion rate or emergent hysterectomy conversions compared to myomectomy as the only treatment. UAE was associated with complications that may result in infertility, such as adhesions (15.3% UAE group vs. 2.2% non-UAE group, p-value .02) and an increased incidence of miscarriage in pregnancies (53.5% UAE group vs. 22.3% non-UAE group, p-value = .01). Furthermore, in cases where a pregnancy did progress following UAE, later obstetrical complications such as abnormal placentation or uterine rupture were common in the series (21.7% UAE group vs. 0% non-UAE group, p-value = .03).

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study indicate that, other than a lower estimated blood loss (EBL), preoperative UAE does not appear to improve the outcome of myomectomies, while potentially increasing the risk of fertility and pregnancy related complications.

Pre-operative uterine artery embolization before hysterectomy or myomectomy: a single-center review of 53 patients

PURPOSE

To assess outcomes of planned pre-operative uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients with uterine fibroids at high risk for bleeding prior to hysterectomy or myomectomy.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A retrospective review of 53 consecutive patients who underwent planned UAE followed by surgery from 2004 to 2019 was performed in a subset of patients deemed high risk for bleeding by the referring surgeon due to bulky fibroids and/or adhesions. Characteristics of the largest fibroid, total number of fibroids, embolic agents, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, and other factors were collected.

RESULTS

53 patients (mean age = 41) had an elective UAE prior to a hysterectomy 24 (45%) or myomectomy 29 (55%). Median interval between UAE & surgery was 21.6 h (range 1.75 h-57 days). Of the myomectomies, 13 (45%) were open, 15 (52%) hysteroscopic and 1 laparoscopic. Mean number of fibroids/patient was 4.1 (SD 1.3), mean fibroid volume was 328 cm3 (range 11-741), and the mean fibroid diameter in longest dimension was 7.4 cm (range 3.2-15). Mean EBL was 90 (SD 99.5 mL). Three (10%) myomectomy patients required blood transfusion. All hysterectomies were via a laparotomy. Mean fibroid volume was 1699 cm3 (range 93-9099 cm3) with a mean maximum diameter of 16.2 cm (range 6.5-29.6) and an average of 2.4 (SD 1.7) fibroids. Mean EBL was 352 (SD 220 mL). Four (17%) hysterectomy patients required an intra- or post-operative blood transfusion. At a mean 1-year follow-up (range 1 month-14 years), 70% of UAE-myomectomy patients and 74% of UAE-hysterectomy patients reported symptom resolution. Three (6%) patients were readmitted: one for osteodiscitis, one wound dehiscence, and one for an infected retained fibroid after myomectomy.

CONCLUSION

Planned pre-operative UAE resulted in intraoperative blood loss similar to "all-comer" myomectomy and hysterectomy patients in the literature. Further studies may elucidate which patients would be the best candidates for this staged treatment paradigm.

Successful pregnancy after presurgical uterine artery embolization in the management of a very large cervical myoma: A case report

Although fibroids are the most common benign tumors of the uterus in women of reproductive age, cervical fibroids are rarely seen. Since cervical fibroids are located deep in the pelvis, the incidence of complications in surgery is high. Among these complications bleeding is the most common, due to poor access to myoma, difficulty in suturing and repair, and distortion of vital neighboring structures. Each case should be managed individually to minimize bleeding. To decrease bleeding in patients who wish to retain their fertility, intraoperative interventions include vasoconstrictors such as vasopressin and adrenaline, uterotonics such as oxytocin, misoprostol or ergometrines, uterine artery clamping, internal iliac artery balloon occlusion catheters, and tourniquets; preoperative interventions include gonadotropin releasing-hormone analogues and uterine artery embolization. We present a case of a 40-year-old woman who had a large cervical myoma and a desire for future fertility. To overcome technical difficulties and reduce intraoperative bleeding during myomectomy, presurgical uterine artery embolization was performed. The patient conceived spontaneously after the operation and a healthy baby was delivered by cesarean section.

•

Cervical myoma is rare.

•

Preoperative uterine artery embolization decreases blood loss and helps preserve the uterus during myomectomy.

•

In pregnant patients with a history of uterine artery embolization the risk of miscarriage, placental insertion anomalies, postpartum hemorrhage and intrauterine growth restriction is increased.

Preoperative Uterine Artery Embolization in Women Undergoing Uterus-Preserving Myomectomy for Extensive Fibroid Disease: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine if a long versus short interval between preoperative uterine artery embolization (PUAE) and subsequent myomectomy impact perioperative blood loss and the complication rate in cases of enlarged multi-fibroid uterus.

DESIGN

In cases of an enlarged multi-fibroid uterus, operative myomectomy can lead to heavy blood loss and consequently increases the risk for transfusion and hysterectomy. PUAE can possibly contribute to a reduction of these risks. Our study was designed to determine if a long versus short interval between PUAE and subsequent surgery impacts perioperative blood loss and complication rate.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

PUAE was performed 24 h before the planned myoma enucleation in 21 patients between January 2011 and March 2016 (group 1) or 19 days before the operation in 23 patients from March 2016 to May 2018 (group 2). A comparison was made to a historical sample of 57 patients with large myomas (>10 cm) without PUAE (group 3). Perioperative blood loss, need for postoperative blood transfusion, and postoperative complications were recorded. Subjective improvement of myoma-related symptoms was assessed for each group by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

PUAE was carried out successfully without complications in all patients. Conversion to hysterectomy was not needed in any of the PUAE patients but was necessary in one of the control patients. In the three groups' comparison, there was a significant lower risk for high blood loss (≥500 mL) in group 1 and a lower but not significant lower risk in group 2 compared to group 3 without an embolization preoperatively. Also, a significant lower risk for postoperative blood transfusion for group 1 (OR 0.02; 0.001-0.328; p = 0.01) and 2 (OR 0.02; 0.001-0.277; p = 0.01) compared to group 3 was observed. The postoperative complication risk was lower in group 2 (model 1: OR 0.12; 0.016-0.848; p = 0.03; model 2 OR 0.07; 0.009-0.588; p = 0.01) compared to group 3. In the context of the postoperative questionnaire, 10 of 11 patients in group 1, 12 of 12 patients in group 2, and 31 of 36 patients from the control group reported an improvement of their complaints.

CONCLUSION

PUAE is beneficial for uterus-preserving removal of myomas from patients with a substantially enlarged uterus. There is a significant reduction of high blood loss (≥500 mL), need for postoperative blood transfusion, and postoperative complications in patients with extensive fibroid disease after PUAE compared to no intervention before myoma enucleation.

Reducing the risk of bleeding after myomectomy: is preemptive embolization a valuable tool?

PURPOSE

Abdominal myomectomy can be a challenging procedure, with elevated intraoperative blood loss and post-operative complications such as the need for blood transfusion and hemostasis with sometimes hysterectomy. Previous studies suggested that preemptive uterine artery embolization (PUAE) might reduce intraoperative blood loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all cases of abdominal myomectomy in our institution between January 2016 and June 2018. Out of 119 cases, 16 patients had PUAE and 103 did not. The objective of our study was to determine whereas PUAE reduced blood loss and post-operative complication rate.

RESULTS

In our study, there was no difference between the two groups in regard to average blood loss (128 vs 192 mL, OR 1,00 [0.99;1,01], p = 0,73), difference between pre- and post-operative hemoglobin level (- 1,15 g/dL vs - 1,32 g/dL, OR 0,91 [0.47;1,73], p = 0,79), and post-operative complications (need for transfusion, surgical revision, post-operative embolization, hysterectomy).

CONCLUSION

Our findings could not conclude that PUAE is effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss during abdominal myomectomy, but it should still be considered an option for patients with large or multiple myomas, with a specific situation or previously operated, who wish to preserve their uterus.

Collaborative Efforts Between Interventional Radiology and Obstetrics/Gynecology

Since the introduction of uterine artery embolization as a treatment option for symptomatic leiomyomas, there has been a growing interest in expanding the role of interventional radiology (IR) in the evaluation and treatment of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) patients. This review provides an overview of opportunities for collaboration between IR and OBGYN. This can include medically and/or surgically complex patients, efforts to reduce quantitative blood loss, obstetrical emergencies, and consideration of fertility or uterine preservation. Increased collaborative efforts between IR and OBGYN would allow for patients to be fully informed regarding the complete spectrum of surgical and nonsurgical treatment options available to them. The purpose of this review is to foster opportunities to improve outcomes and respect patient values.

[Prevention of bleeding during laparotomic myomectomy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Contribution to the tourniquet on the uterine isthmus]

OBJECTIVES

To appreciate the decrease of bleeding by myomectomy by the use of a tourniquet on the uterine isthmus.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control retrospective study from March 2014 to February 2016 in the Gynecology and obstetrics Department of the university hospital of Yopougon (Abidjan, Ivory Coast). It interested 100 patients of which 50 had a myomectomy with the tourniquet on the uterine isthmus and 50 without the tourniquet. None of the patients received pre-operative preventive treatment. The criteria for comparison were the blood loss per operative and the pre-and post-operative hemoglobin levels.

RESULTS

The average age of patients was 33 years. Nulliparous women were the group most affected (68% of our patients) with 32% infertile women in the group with the tourniquet and 18% in the group without the tourniquet. Patients without tourniquet presented more bleeding than patients with tourniquet (X2=13.61) with a higher proportion of anemic patients in the group without the tourniquet. The differences were significant. The tourniquet has made it possible to realize the resection of a larger number of myoma. The duration of hospital stay was 4 days on average in both groups and no complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a tourniquet on the uterine isthmus during laparotomic myomectomy has a benefit in reducing intraoperative blood loss.