Severe sepsis caused by a linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a 10-year-old girl after multiple trauma

Clinical Effectiveness, Safety Profile, and Pharmacokinetics of Daptomycin in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review

Infections by Gram-positive pathogens pose a public health risk, especially due to increasing antibiotic resistance. Daptomycin has efficacy against most clinically important Gram-positive bacteria. Although experience regarding use of daptomycin in adults is increasing, studies on pediatric populations are limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in pediatric settings. We searched MEDLINE and Clinicaltrials.gov (through April 2016) and included 29 original studies in the final analysis. Available evidence suggests that daptomycin in pediatric patients has a favorable safety and tolerability profile and is an efficacious alternative for treatment of Gram-positive bacteremia, endocarditis, and infections of the skin, soft tissues, joints, and bones, especially when resistant strains are involved. However, future studies need to address several issues to determine the optimal dose and various pharmacokinetic parameters in different pediatric age groups.

Proper use of antibiotics: situation of linezolid at the intensive care unit of the Tunisian Military Hospital

Linezolid was introduced in clinical practice in the early 2000s. It was considered to be an ideal reserve drug for treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE) and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA). The aim of our study was to describe and evaluate the use of linezolid in clinical practice at the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Tunisian military hospital. This is a thirty-month retrospective study including patients treated with linezolid at the ICU of the Tunisian military hospital. Data collection was realized using the patients' medical files and prescriptions. A pharmacist conducted an extended medication history and checked if an advice from an infectious disease-physician and a microbiological documentation were requested. A total of 80 patients were included. Forty-one per cent of indications were outside the Marketing Authorization (MA) criteria, and were mainly sepsis and postoperative mediastinitis (32% and 4% of total prescriptions, respectively). This antibiotic was used as a first-line therapy in 58% of cases. The advice from an infectious-disease physician was requested for 33% of prescriptions. Only 20% of infections were documented microbiologically, of which 35% were caused by methicillin resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Linezolid is an interesting therapeutic alternative in case of infections due to multi-resistant bacteria and/or complex clinical situations. Therefore, its prescription must be rationalized in order to slow down the emergence of resistance to this antibiotic. The high frequency of its use outside the MA criteria shows the importance of carrying out more clinical trials to evaluate its effectiveness and safety for new indications.

Pancytopenia due to linezolid treatment

Antibiotic-resistant infections constitute a significant portion of severe childhood infections. A gradually increasing resistance and treatment difficulty are observed in infections caused by enterococci, staphylococci and pneumococci. Linezolid is one of the new antibiotics which has recently been introduced for clinical use with gram positive efficiency. In this article, a pediatric patient with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus infection who developed reversible bone marrow supression related with use of linesolid was presented. A shunt was inserted in a ten-month old female patient who had been operated at the age of one month because of meningomyelocele and who had developed hydrocephalus. Linezolid and meropenem treatment was started when vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase positive Escherichia coli grew in cerebrospinal fluid culture. In the second week of treatment, cerebrospinal fluid findings improved. However, bone marrow supression was observed. Linezolid treatment was discontinued. In the follow-up, the blood cell counts returned to normal levels.

To swab or not to swab? A prospective analysis of 341 SICU VRE screens

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) screening is routine practice in many intensive care units despite the question of its clinical significance. The value of VRE screening at predicting subsequent VRE or other hospital-acquired infection (HAI) is unknown. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the rate of subsequent VRE HAI in patients undergoing VRE screening.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a 24-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at a Level I trauma center. Patients admitted to the SICU between February and August 2011 who had rectal swab for VRE screening within 72 hours were followed prospectively for the development of VRE and other HAIs. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and infection rates were compared between VRE-positive and VRE-negative patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of VRE screening for predicting subsequent VRE HAI were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 341 patients had VRE screening within 72 hours of SICU admission, with 32 VRE-positive (9%) and 309 VRE-negative (91%) patients. VRE-positive patients had a higher incidence of any HAI (78% vs. 35%, p < 0.001). Eight VRE-positive patients (25%) developed VRE HAI compared with only 3 VRE-negative patients (1%) (p < 0.001). VRE screening had a 73% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 25% PPV, and 99% NPV for determining subsequent VRE HAI.

CONCLUSION

VRE colonization was present in 9% of SICU patients at admission. Negative VRE screen result had a high specificity and NPV for the development of subsequent VRE HAI. Empiric treatment of VRE infection may be unnecessary in VRE-negative patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III. Therapeutic study, level IV.