1
|
Trappe M, Affeldt P, Grundmann F, Kann M, Koehler FC, Müller RU, Stippel D, Kaiser R, Knops E, Heger E, Steger G, Klein F, Kurschat C, Di Cristanziano V. Five-year single-center analysis of cytomegalovirus viremia in kidney transplant recipients and possible implication for novel prophylactic therapy approaches. Transpl Infect Dis 2024; 26:e14233. [PMID: 38180168 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are a common complication after kidney transplantation (KTx) and negatively affecting patient outcome. Valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis is often limited by drug-induced side effects and dose reduction due to decline in kidney function. METHOD In the present study, episodes of CMV viremia in the first year after KTx in a cohort of 316 recipients were analyzed retrospectively to identify risk factors linked to persistent infections. RESULTS In the studied cohort, 18.7% of patients showed a high-risk (HR) constellation (D+/R-) for CMV infections. CMV viremia affected 22% of our cohort, with HR patients being the most affected cohort (44.1%). Within this group, most viremic events (65.3%) occurred while patients were still on prophylactic therapy, showing significantly higher viral loads and a longer duration compared to seropositive recipients. CONCLUSION The analysis at hand revealed that detection of viremia under ongoing antiviral prophylaxis bears an increased risk for sustained viral replication and antiviral drug resistance in HR patients. We identified low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and lower dose VGC prophylaxis post-KTx as a risk factor for breakthrough infections in HR patients in our single center cohort. These patients might benefit from a closer CMV monitoring or novel prophylactic agents as letermovir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Trappe
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Patrick Affeldt
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Franziska Grundmann
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kann
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix C Koehler
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roman-Ulrich Müller
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Stippel
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - Rolf Kaiser
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena Knops
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eva Heger
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gertrud Steger
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Klein
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christine Kurschat
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Veronica Di Cristanziano
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A Retrospective Review of Calcineurin Inhibitors’ Impact on Cytomegalovirus Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients. TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology2040045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunosuppressive therapy reduces the risk for allograft rejection but leaves recipients susceptible to infections. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most frequent causes for infection after transplantation and increases the risk for allograft rejection. As lung transplant recipients (LTRs) need to be under immunosuppression for life, they are a vulnerable group. To determine the potential association between the development of CMV infection and the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) blood levels within previous 90 days, a retrospective review of LTRs was performed. Data from recipients who underwent a lung transplantation (LTx) at our center from January 2011 to December 2018 were collected. The studied recipients, after case/control matching, included 128 CMV-infection cases. The median time from the transplant to the first positive CMV viral load was 291.5 days. In our study, more patients were treated with tacrolimus (91.9%) than with cyclosporine (8.1%). Drug blood levels at selected timepoints showed no statistically significant difference between cases and controls. However, we found that CMV infection was more frequent in the donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative group, interstitial lung disease (ILD) recipients, LTRs who underwent basiliximab induction, cyclosporine treated recipients, and LTRs with lymphopenia (at the time of CMV infection and 90 days before). In this review of LTRs, no association between the CNI blood level and CMV infection was seen, although other immunity-related factors were found to be influencing, i.e., basiliximab induction, cyclosporine treatment, and lymphopenia.
Collapse
|
3
|
Raval AD, Kistler KD, Tang Y, Murata Y, Snydman DR. Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes associated with cytomegalovirus in adult kidney transplant recipients: A systematic literature review of real-world evidence. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 23:e13483. [PMID: 33012092 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have increased risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/disease given the necessity of drug-induced immunosuppression. A comprehensive review of published literature reporting real-world data on prevention strategies utilized and associated CMV burden outcomes is limited. Such data could help inform future clinical practice and identify unmet needs in CMV management. We conducted a systematic review of observational studies published in Medline or EMBASE from January 2008 to November 2018 to identify current real-world CMV management approaches, CMV infection/disease risk factors, and outcomes associated with CMV infection. Descriptive statistics and pooled quantitative analyses were conducted. From 1608 records screened, 86 citations, including 69 803 adult KTR, were included. Prophylaxis and preemptive therapy (PET) were predominant approaches among D+/R- and R + CMV serostatus transplants, respectively. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir were frequently utilized across CMV risk strata. Despite prevention approaches, approximately one-fourth of KTR developed CMV infection. Age and D+/R- CMV serostatus were consistent risk factors for CMV infection/disease. CMV infection/disease was associated with increased mortality and graft loss. CMV was similarly associated with acute rejection (AR) risk, but with high heterogeneity among studies. Limited data were available on CMV and opportunistic infections (OIs) risk. CMV remains a significant issue. New strategies may be needed to optimize CMV management.
Collapse
|
4
|
Dangi A, Yu S, Luo X. Apoptotic cell-based therapies for promoting transplantation tolerance. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 23:552-558. [PMID: 30024416 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article is aimed to provide readers with an updated review on the applicability, efficacy, and challenges of employing donor apoptotic cell-based therapies to promote transplantation tolerance in various experimental and clinical settings. RECENT FINDINGS Recently, donor apoptotic cell-based therapies have been employed in various models of cell (including pancreatic islets and bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells) and solid organ (heart and kidney) transplantation to promote donor-specific tolerance. Published data, thus far, have revealed a high potential of this approach in inducing robust transplantation tolerance. Recent clinical trials have also underscored the safety and potential efficacy of this approach in alleviating graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Host factors including prior allo-sensitization and opportunistic infections pose major obstacles in establishing transplantation tolerance employing this strategy. However, emerging data provide strategies for overcoming such obstacles in these clinically relevant settings. SUMMARY Donor apoptotic cell therapy is an emerging strategy in promoting transplantation tolerance, with recent data emphasizing its efficacy and applicability for transplantation tolerance in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Dangi
- Center for Kidney Research and Therapeutics, Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute.,Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine
| | - Shuangjin Yu
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine
| | - Xunrong Luo
- Center for Kidney Research and Therapeutics, Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute.,Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine.,Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ilinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Andrei G, Van Loon E, Lerut E, Victoor J, Meijers B, Bammens B, Sprangers B, Gillemot S, Fiten P, Opdenakker G, Lagrou K, Kuypers D, Snoeck R, Naesens M. Persistent primary cytomegalovirus infection in a kidney transplant recipient: Multi-drug resistant and compartmentalized infection leading to graft loss. Antiviral Res 2019; 168:203-209. [PMID: 31212020 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common opportunistic infections after transplantation. To prevent CMV infections, universal prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy with ganciclovir or its prodrug valganciclovir is applied. However, prolonged antiviral therapy may result in drug-resistance emergence. We describe a case of a 43-year-old CMV-seronegative patient who underwent kidney transplantation from a CMV-seropositive donor and developed CMV disease despite valganciclovir prophylaxis. CMV viral load increased even though valgangiclovir dose was augmented and immunosuppressive therapy reduced. CMV genotyping revealed mutations in the viral UL97 protein kinase, explaining ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection. The viral load failed to respond to foscavir, cidofovir and CMV-neutralizing immunoglobulins. Kidney allograft dysfunction developed 3 months post-transplantation with a histopathologic diagnosis of CMV nephropathy and potentially concomitant T-cell mediated rejection. A transplantectomy was performed on day 164 post-transplantation since the patient had uncontrollable CMV disease associated with a circulating multidrug-resistant DNA polymerase-mutant virus. Detailed monitoring in this patient demonstrated hallmarks of complicated CMV disease: (i) relatively rapid evolution of drug-resistant CMV mutants in the setting of persistent high blood viral loads, (ii) emergence of viral drug-resistance linked to acute graft rejection, (iii) transient and, thereafter, lack of response to various anti-CMV treatments, (iv) compartmentalization and heterogeneity of CMV viral populations, (v) possible differential ability of viral mutants to cause disease in the graft, and (vi) detection of minor viral variants by next generation sequencing. Translational research platforms that provide rapid molecular genotyping for detection of CMV drug-resistance are essential in guiding CMV disease management in high-risk transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisabet Van Loon
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelyne Lerut
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasper Victoor
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Björn Meijers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bert Bammens
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Sprangers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Pierre Fiten
- Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Katrien Lagrou
- Laboratory of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert Snoeck
- Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|