Antifungal agents for invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill adults: What do the guidelines recommend?

International guidelines for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli infections: A comparison and evaluation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to appraise clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli (CRGNB) infections and to summarise the recommendations.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature published from January 2012 to March 2023 was undertaken to identify CPGs related to CRGNB infections treatment. The methodological and reporting quality of eligible CPGs were assessed using six domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool and seven domains of the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) checklist. Basic information and recommendations of included CPGs were extracted and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 21 CPGs from 7953 relevant articles were included. The mean overall AGREE II score was 62.7%, and was highest for "clarity of presentation" (90.2%) and lowest for "stakeholder involvement" (44.8%). The overall reporting quality of all of the CPGs was suboptimal, with the proportion of eligible items ranging from 45.7 to 85.7%. The treatment of CRGNB infections is related to the type of pathogen, the sensitivity of antimicrobial agents, and the site of infection. In general, the recommended options mainly included novel β-lactam/ β-lactamase inhibitors, cefiderocol, ampicillin-sulbactam (mainly for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAB]), and combination therapy, involving polymyxin B/colistin, tigecycline (except for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa), aminoglycosides, carbapenems, fosfomycin, and sulbactam (mainly for CRAB).

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological and reporting quality of CPGs for the treatment of CRGNB infections are generally suboptimal and need further improvement. Both monotherapy with novel drugs and combination therapy play important roles in the treatment.

Effect of empirical antifungal treatment on mortality in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study

To evaluate the effect of empirical antifungal treatment (EAFT) on mortality in critically ill patients without invasive fungal infections (IFIs). This was a single-center propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study involving non-transplanted, non-neutropenic critically ill patients with risk factors for invasive candidiasis (IC) in the absence of IFIs. We compared all-cause hospital mortality and infection-attributable hospital mortality in patients who was given EAFT for suspected IC as the cohort group and those without any systemic antifungal agents as the control group. Among 640 eligible patients, 177 patients given EAFT and 177 control patients were included in the analyses. As compared with controls, EAFT was not associated with the lower risks of all-cause hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.911; 95% CI, 0.541-1.531; P = 0.724] or infection-attributable hospital mortality (OR, 1.149; 95% CI, 0.632-2.092; P = 0.648). EAFT showed no benefit of improvement of infection at discharge, duration of mechanical ventilation, and antibiotic-free days. However, the later initiation of EAFT was associated with higher risks of all-cause hospital mortality (OR, 1.039; 95% CI, 1.003 to 1.076; P = 0.034) and infection-attributable hospital mortality (OR, 1.046; 95% CI, 1.009 to 1.085; P = 0.015) in patients with suspected IC. This effect was also found in infection-attributable hospital mortality (OR, 1.042; 95% CI, 1.005 to 1.081; P = 0.027) in septic patients with suspected IC. EAFT failed to decrease hospital mortality in non-neutropenic critically ill patients without IFIs. The timing may be critical for EAFT to improve mortality in these patients with suspected IC. ChiCTR2000038811, registered on Oct 3, 2020.

Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic antifungal agents for candidemia: a systematic review with network meta-analysis and multicriteria acceptability analyses

AIM

Invasive candidiasis is the most common fungal infection in patients attending health services and is associated with high mortality rates and prolonged hospital stay. The aim of this review was to evaluate and compare efficacy and safety of antifungal agents for the treatment of candidemia.

METHODS

A systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA), surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA) and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analyses (SMAA) was performed (PROSPERO-CRD42020149264). Searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus (Nov-2021). Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of oral antifungals (any dose or regimen) on mycological cure, discontinuation rates and adverse events were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 trials (n=3632) were analysed. There were no significant differences between therapies for the efficacy outcomes; however, caspofungin (50-150 mg), rezafungin (200-400 mg) and micafungin (100-150 mg) had higher rates of clinical and mycological responses (SUCRA overall response >60%) and were considered the most promising therapies. Fluconazole (400 mg) rated worst for overall response (17%). Rezafungin (200-400 mg) and micafungin (100 mg) were associated with lower discontinuation rates (<40%). Conventional amphotericin B (0.6-0.7 mg/kg) was more likely to be discontinued (odds ratio [OR] 0.08; 95% credibility interval [CrI] 0.00-0.95 vs. caspofungin 150 mg) and may impair liver function (87%).

CONCLUSION

Echinocandins are recommended as first-line treatments for invasive candidiasis following a priority order of caspofungin then micafungin. Rezafungin, an echinocandin under development, represents a potential option that should be further investigated. Azoles and liposomal amphotericin B can be used as second-line treatments in cases of fungal resistance or hypersensitivity.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment of Different Antifungal Agents in De-escalation Treatment in Critically Ill Patients: a Step toward Dose Optimization Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Differences in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment are rarely considered when antifungals are switched in critically ill patients. This study intends to explore whether the antifungal de-escalation treatment strategy and the new intermittent dosing strategy of echinocandins in critically ill patients are able to achieve the corresponding PK/PD targets. The published population PK models of antifungals in critically ill patients and a public data set from the MIMIC-III database (n = 662) were employed to evaluate PK/PD target attainment of different dosing regimens of antifungals. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated for each dosing regimen. Most guideline-recommended dosing regimens of fluconazole and voriconazole could achieve target exposure as de-escalation treatment in critically ill patients. For initial echinocandin treatment, achievement of the target exposure decreased as body weight increased, and the intermittent dosing strategy had a slightly higher CFR value in most simulations compared to conventional dosing strategy. For Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infection, caspofungin at the lowest dose achieved a CFR of >90%, while micafungin or anidulafungin required almost the highest doses simulated in this study to achieve the same effect. None of the echinocandins other than 150 mg every 24 h (q24h) or 200 mg q48h of caspofungin achieved the target CFR for Candida parapsilosis infection. These findings support the guideline-recommended dose of triazoles for antifungal de-escalation treatment and confirm the insufficient dosage of echinocandins in critically ill patients, indicating that a dosing regimen based on body weight or intermittent dosing of echinocandins may be required.

Increasing Incidence and Shifting Epidemiology of Candidemia in Greece: Results from the First Nationwide 10-Year Survey

Globally, candidemia displays geographical variety in terms of epidemiology and incidence. In that respect, a nationwide Greek study was conducted, reporting the epidemiology of Candida bloodstream infections and susceptibility of isolates to antifungal agents providing evidence for empirical treatment. All microbiologically confirmed candidemia cases in patients hospitalized in 28 Greek centres during the period 2009–2018 were recorded. The study evaluated the incidence of infection/100,000 inhabitants, species distribution, and antifungal susceptibilities of isolated strains. Overall, 6057 candidemic episodes occurred during the study period, with 3% of them being mixed candidemias. The average annual incidence was 5.56/100,000 inhabitants, with significant increase over the years (p = 0.0002). C. parapsilosis species complex (SC) was the predominant causative agent (41%), followed by C. albicans (37%), C. glabrata SC (10%), C. tropicalis (7%), C. krusei (1%), and other rare Candida spp. (4%). C. albicans rates decreased from 2009 to 2018 (48% to 31%) in parallel with a doubling incidence of C. parapsilosis SC rates (28% to 49%, p < 0.0001). Resistance to amphotericin B and flucytosine was not observed. Resistance to fluconazole was detected in 20% of C. parapsilosis SC isolates, with a 4% of them being pan-azole-resistant. A considerable rising rate of resistance to this agent was observed over the study period (p < 0.0001). Echinocandin resistance was found in 3% of C. glabrata SC isolates, with 70% of them being pan-echinocandin-resistant. Resistance rate to this agent was stable over the study period. This is the first multicentre nationwide study demonstrating an increasing incidence of candidemia in Greece with a species shift toward C. parapsilosis SC. Although the overall antifungal resistance rates remain relatively low, fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis SC raises concern.

Evaluation of the current guidelines for antibacterial therapy strategies in patients with cirrhosis or liver failure

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are common complications in patients with cirrhosis or liver failure and are correlated with high mortality. Clinical practice guideline (CPG) is a reference used to help clinicians make decisions. This systematic appraisal aimed to evaluate the methodological quality and summarize the recommendations of reported CPGs in these patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched CPGs published from 2008 to 2019. The methodological quality of the included CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II instrument. We extracted and compared recommendations for prophylactic and empirical treatment strategies.

RESULTS

Fourteen CPGs with a median overall score of 56.3% were included. The highest domain score was Clarity of Presentation (domain 4, 85.4%), and the lowest was for Stakeholder Involvement (domain 2, 31.3%). Three CPGs had an overall score above 80%, and 6 CPGs had a score above 90% in domain 4. Prophylaxis should be strictly limited to patients with varicose bleeding, low ascites protein levels and a history of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Fluoroquinolones (norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin), third-generation cephalosporins (G3) (ceftriaxone and cefotaxime) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) are recommended for preventing infections in patients with cirrhosis or liver failure. G3, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs) and carbapenems are recommended as the first choice in empirical treatment according to local epidemiology of bacterial resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological quality of CPGs focused on patients with cirrhosis or liver failure evaluated by the AGREE II instrument is generally poor. Three CPGs that were considered applicable without modification and 6 CPGs that scored above 90% in domain 4 should also be paid more attention to by healthcare practitioners. Regarding recommendations, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and SXT are recommended for prophylactic treatment appropriately. G3, BLBLIs, and carbapenems are recommended for use in empirical treatment strategies.

Trends in systemic antifungal use in Australia, 2005-2016: a time-series analysis

Data on antifungal utilization trends are important to encourage antifungal stewardship. This study explored the utilization of antifungal agents for systemic use and the impact of reimbursement policy changes in Australia. We analyzed national data from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) (2005-2016). We examined patterns of use over time and the impact of reimbursement decisions on antifungal use with an interrupted time-series model. In 2005-2016, there has been an increase in the use of most antifungals, especially fluconazole, itraconazole and posaconazole. Ketoconazole was the most commonly dispensed systemic antifungal (46.0%) before its PBS listing removal, when it was replaced by fluconazole (69.8%). The PBS event "Fluconazole and itraconazole restrictions eased" led to increased use of fluconazole (0.025/1000 per day with no delay). Both the largest rates and numerical increase were among obstetricians and gynecologists (1,969%; 1,851 dispensed prescriptions) and dermatologists (1,723%; 1,689 dispensed prescriptions) except general practitioner (2010-2016). This is the first Australian national longitudinal estimate of systemic antifungal use. It shows an overall increase in prescribing of most antifungals during study period, with reimbursement decisions impacting utilization. These data provide a baseline to inform development of national antifungal guidelines and policies to encourage more targeted antifungal stewardship.

ICU Patients' Antibiotic Exposure and Triazole-Resistance in Invasive Candidiasis: Parallel Analysis of Aggregated and Individual Data

Background: The relationship between antibiotic use and the incidence of triazole-resistant phenotypes of invasive candidiasis (IC) in critically ill patients is unclear. Different methodologies on determining this relationship may yield different results.

Methods: A retrospective multicenter observational analysis was conducted to investigate exposure to antibiotics and the incidence of non-duplicate clinical isolates of Candida spp. resistant to fluconazole, voriconazole, or both during November 2013 to April 2018, using two different methodologies: group-level (time-series analysis) and individual-patient-level (regression analysis and propensity-score adjusting).

Results: Of 393 identified Candida spp. from 388 critically ill patients, there were three phenotypes of IC identified: fluconazole-resistance (FR, 63, 16.0%); voriconazole-resistance (VR, 46, 11.7%); and cross-resistance between fluconazole and voriconazole (CR, 32, 8.1%). Exposure to several antibacterial agents with activity against the anaerobic gastrointestinal flora, especially third-generation cefalosporins (mainly cefoperazone/sulbactam and ceftriaxone), but not triazoles, have an immediate effect (time lag = 0) on subsequent ICU-acquired triazole-resistant IC in the group-level (p < 0.05). When the same patient database was analyzed at the individual-patient-level, we found that exposure to many antifungal agents was significantly associated with triazole-resistance (fluconazole [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.73] or caspofungin [aOR = 11.32] on FR, voriconazole [aOR = 2.87] on CR). Compared to the mono-triazole-resistant phenotype, CR IC has worse clinical outcomes (14-days mortality) and a higher level of resistance.

Conclusion: Group-level and individual-patient-level analyses of antibiotic-use-versus-resistance relations yielded distinct but valuable results. Antibacterials with antianaerobic activity and antifungals might have “indirect” and “direct” effect on triazole-resistant IC, respectively.

Candida albicans-The Virulence Factors and Clinical Manifestations of Infection

Candida albicans is a common commensal fungus that colonizes the oropharyngeal cavity, gastrointestinal and vaginal tract, and healthy individuals' skin. In 50% of the population, C. albicans is part of the normal flora of the microbiota. The various clinical manifestations of Candida species range from localized, superficial mucocutaneous disorders to invasive diseases that involve multiple organ systems and are life-threatening. From systemic and local to hereditary and environmental, diverse factors lead to disturbances in Candida's normal homeostasis, resulting in a transition from normal flora to pathogenic and opportunistic infections. The transition in the pathophysiology of the onset and progression of infection is also influenced by Candida's virulence traits that lead to the development of candidiasis. Oral candidiasis has a wide range of clinical manifestations, divided into primary and secondary candidiasis. The main supply of C. albicans in the body is located in the gastrointestinal tract, and the development of infections occurs due to dysbiosis of the residential microbiota, immune dysfunction, and damage to the muco-intestinal barrier. The presence of C. albicans in the blood is associated with candidemia-invasive Candida infections. The commensal relationship exists as long as there is a balance between the host immune system and the virulence factors of C. albicans. This paper presents the virulence traits of Candida albicans and clinical manifestations of specific candidiasis.

From bench to bedside: Perspectives on the utility of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in predicting the efficacy of antifungals in invasive candidiasis

The aim of this perspective is to give an overlook on the utility of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) in predicting the efficacy of antifungals in invasive candidiasis. Overall, from the available literature it appears that bridging data of PK/PD of antifungals from the laboratory to the clinic for the treatment of invasive candidiasis are feasible only partially. Fluconazole is the only antifungal agent having the pharmacodynamic threshold of efficacy identified in experimental animal models convincingly validated in the clinical setting of invasive candidiasis as well. Conversely, for voriconazole and posaconazole data on this topic are very limited. For the echinocandins, robust PK/PD identified in the laboratory represented the rationale for defining differential clinical breakpoints of echinocandins against different species of Candida by the regulatory agencies. However, translation of the findings in the clinical setting provided conflicting results. Data on PK/PD of amphotericin B and flucytosine in models of invasive candidiasis are quite limited, and clinical studies assessing the role of drug exposure on efficacy are currently lacking. The expectation is that prospective studies could test more and more frequently the validity of experimental PK/PD data of antifungals in the clinical setting of invasive candidiasis. The findings could represent a step forward in addressing adequate antifungal stewardship programmes.

Evaluation of first-line therapies for the treatment of candidemia in ICU patients: A propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Candidemia is a major cause of mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). According to the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), an echinocandin is recommended as initial therapy and fluconazole as an alternative. In a context of echinocandin resistance development, the question arising is whether azoles are a suitable alternative to echinocandins for the treatment of candidemia in critically ill patients.

METHODS

A 3-year (2015-2017) retrospective multicentric cohort study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of candidemia during the ICU stay and treated with echinocandins or azoles were included. Demographic, clinical data, mycological data, and antifungal treatments were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, univariate analysis, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis using a propensity score with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method were performed.

FINDINGS

Seventy-nine patients (n = 79) were analyzed. Treatment success, as well as survival on day 90 (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log rank test, p = 0.542), were comparable between patients who received echinocandins (caspofungin (n = 47)) or azoles (fluconazole (n = 29) or voriconazole (n = 3)). A multivariable analysis demonstrated that higher SOFA score on the day of candidemia diagnosis and absence of adequate Candida source control were independently associated with a greater risk of 90-day mortality, whereas azoles treatment was not associated with an excess 90-day mortality.

INTERPRETATION

This study confirms that the use of azoles recommended for candidemia, mostly fluconazole, as a first-line therapy is a reasonable alternative to caspofungin for ICU patients in our institution. This needs to be included in local guidelines through antifungal stewardship programs.