Nurses’ involvement in physician-assisted dying under the euthanasia law in Belgium

Nursing students' view on their future role and skills regarding euthanasia due to unbearable mental suffering: A mixed-method Study

AIM

To explore final-year bachelor nursing students' view on their future role and skills regarding euthanasia due to unbearable mental suffering (UMS-euthanasia) and to discover possible education needs.

BACKGROUND

Since UMS-euthanasia is legal in Belgium, nursing students will be confronted with this issue during their future internship, or professional career. Graduated nurses believe to have an important role in the process of euthanasia where good communication skills and sufficient legal knowledge are essential.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods sequential explanatory design.

METHODS

First, a questionnaire was administered to all final-year bachelor nursing students at eight university colleges in Flanders (October 2020 and March 2021). Second, qualitative information was collected by organising focus groups with these students to gain more insights into the quantitative results (October 2021).

RESULTS

The final-year nursing students from the survey (n = 249) and from the three focus groups (n = 21) see a clear future role for themselves in the decision-making process, as well as in supporting the patient and family before, during and after UMS-euthanasia, but not in assisting in administering UMS-euthanasia. However, they also indicate they lack knowledge and skills in dealing adequately with UMS-euthanasia. Psychiatric internship alumni perceive a diminished role for themselves in the preparatory acts (p < 0.05). Ever involved in euthanasia shows a statistically significant difference in the demand for simulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing students see an important role for nurses in UMS-euthanasia but feel inadequately prepared to take on this role. A combination of theoretical knowledge, clinical experience, open discussions, reflection and simulation is an opportunity to prepare nurses for their future role.

An international expansion in voluntary euthanasia/assisted dying: The implications for nursing

AIM

To provide an update on the international position of assisted dying legislation and its implications for nursing policy.

BACKGROUND

Assisted dying legislation has been introduced in health systems in Europe, North America and Australasia (Australia and New Zealand). Despite contributions in research literature, this remains focussed on medical practitioners, with limited acknowledgement of the need for policy development in nursing.

DISCUSSION

There is a need for critical evaluation of this contemporary issue and the significance for nursing practice of the lack of unified nursing perspective and robust policy guidance is identified. An overview of the existing role of voluntary euthanasia/assisted dying with recent developments is provided and the resulting concerns for nurses regarding the scope of practice, role confusion and conflicting professional values is considered.

CONCLUSION

Despite a long history of assisted dying and the continued expansion of these practices, limited and highly variable nursing policy highlights the lack of clear guidance available to nurses. The growing inclusion of nurse practitioners and recognition of registered nurse involvement in the care of individuals on an assisted dying pathway merits clearer support from regulatory authorities and professional organisations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses are the most likely health professionals to be approached with questions regarding assisted dying; they are intimately involved in patient experiences and need to understand what is possible, expected and legal in terms of their scope of practice regarding assisted dying.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING POLICY

Nursing regulators and professional representatives need to provide clear policy statements and guidance identifying the nursing role and recognising where protections and support are necessary.

Opinions of nurses regarding Euthanasia and Medically Assisted Suicide

BACKGROUND

Safeguarding the right to die according to the principles of autonomy and freedom of each person has become more important in the last decade, therefore increasing regulation of Euthanasia and Medically Assisted Suicide (MAS).

AIMS

To learn the opinions that the nurses of the autonomous region of Madrid have regarding Euthanasia and Medically Assisted Suicide.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Cross-sectional descriptive study.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

All registered nurses in Madrid. The study was done by means of a self-completed anonymous questionnaire. The variables studied were social-demographic, giving opinions about Euthanasia and MAS.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Each participant was assured maximum confidentiality and anonymity, ensuring the ethical principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki, as well as in the Organic Law 3/2018, on Personal Data Protection and guarantee of digital rights.

FINDINGS

A total of 489 nurses answered the questionnaire. In total, 75.7% of the nurses confirmed that Euthanasia should be regulated in Spain. 66.3% indicated that information on Euthanasia should be provided jointly by doctors and nurses, and 42.3% considered that it could be applied by both medical and nursing professionals. A total of 87.2% advocated the participation of nurses in health policy, influencing the drafting of the law. In the face of possible regulation, 35% would request Conscientious Objection, being closely related to their religious beliefs.

DISCUSSION

Different authors point out that nurses' perceptions and attitudes towards Euthanasia are conditioned by different factors, such as religion, gender, poor palliative care, legality and the patient's right to die.

CONCLUSION

Nurses are positioned in favour of the regulation and practice of Euthanasia and MAS, depending on their age, years of experience, training, model of care and especially religious beliefs.

Nursing Students' Attitudes, Future Role, and Knowledge Regarding Euthanasia Due to Unbearable Mental Suffering: A Single-Site Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

This study examines the attitudes, view of their future role, and knowledge of nursing students regarding euthanasia due to unbearable mental suffering (UMS euthanasia) in Belgium. Nurses have a key role in this situation at many levels. The practice of euthanasia is expanding globally and laws are changing, making more research essential.

METHOD

A cross-sectional design and online survey were used. All nursing students at a Belgian university college participated.

RESULTS

The majority of nursing students had a high degree of acceptance towards UMS euthanasia and highlighted their important role in the euthanasia decision-making process, but also reported a lack of knowledge and skills.

CONCLUSION

Nursing education at all levels needs to recognize this knowledge gap, taking into account the complexity and broader context of end-of-life care.

Flemish healthcare providers' attitude towards tiredness of life and euthanasia: a survey study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the legal understanding and attitudes of nurses and physicians in both acute and chronic geriatric care (Flanders, Belgium) regarding euthanasia in the context of tiredness of life in older people.

METHOD

Healthcare providers employed in acute care (59 geriatricians and 75 nurses of acute geriatric wards), as well as chronic care (135 general practitioners (GPs) and 76 nurses employed in nursing homes and home care services) were sent a survey with four case vignettes. For each case vignette, respondents were asked the following questions: (1) 'Does this case fit the due-care criteria of the euthanasia law?', (2) 'Do you consider this person to be tired of life?', (3) 'Can you comprehend this person's euthanasia request?'.

RESULTS

In cases of severe and life-limiting physical suffering, where the patient meets the legal criteria for euthanasia in Belgium, only 50% of physicians and nurses are aware of this legal basis. In case of tiredness of life without underlying pathology, nurses showed more comprehension for the euthanasia request compared to physicians (43.0% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.001). Physicians tend to assess the legal base of an euthanasia-request depending on the severity of physical morbidity, whereas nurses show a greater comprehension towards euthanasia-requests even in absence of severe illness. Geriatricians are more reserved regarding performing euthanasia themselves as compared to GPs, regardless of underlying pathology or reason for the euthanasia-request (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The legal understanding and attitude of Flemish physicians and nurses towards tiredness of life and euthanasia in older patients differed to a great extent. This study showed (1) a lack of awareness of the legal basis for euthanasia in the context of ToL among all HCPs, (2) differences in the extent of comprehension between nurses and physicians and (3) differences in willingness to actually perform euthanasia between geriatricians and GPs. So even with the formulation of strict due-care criteria there is still room for interpretation. This creates a gray area and a discussion point between healthcare providers.

Spanish regulation of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide

In March 2021, the Spanish Congress approved the law regulating euthanasia, that regulates both euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS). In this article, we analyse the Spanish law regulating euthanasia and PAS, comparing it with the rest of the European laws on euthanasia and PAS (Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg). Identified strengths of the Spanish law, with respect to other norms, are that it is a law with many safeguards, which broadly recognises professionals' right to conscientious objection and the specification that it makes on the prior comprehensive care of the patient, including the approach to care dependency. Regarding its shortcomings, the law does not differentiate well between euthanasia and PAS; it barely assigns a role to the healthcare team as a whole (similar to other regulations); it does not clarify the functions of the different professionals involved; it does not detail the specific composition and duration of theevaluation commission; it has not been accompanied by a prior or simultaneous regulation of palliative care; and, lastly, the period of time to implement the law is too short.

Ethical, Policy, and Practice Implications of Nurses' Experiences With Assisted Death: A Synthesis

The conceptualization of assisted death as an act performed by physicians has resulted in a lack of attention to nurses' roles and experiences with the processes that surround an assisted death. In this article, we synthesize evidence from 6 articles focusing on the experiences of 55 nurses from Canada, Belgium, and the Netherlands, with relevant ethical and policy implications derived from the literature. Nurses have a central role in negotiating inquiries about assisted death and in providing wraparound care for patients, families, and other health care providers. This role is impactful for nurses and requires significant personal and professional moral work.

The attitudes, role & knowledge of mental health nurses towards euthanasia because of unbearable mental suffering in Belgium: A pilot study

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE SUBJECT?: Euthanasia because of unbearable mental suffering (UMS euthanasia) has been legal in Belgium since 2002 under strict conditions of careful practice. UMS euthanasia occurs fairly rarely in Belgium, but the frequency has increased substantially over the past few years. Although most mental health nurses play an important role and are supportive of euthanasia in general, their role, attitude and knowledge when it comes to UMS euthanasia were unknown until now. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Most mental health nurses in Belgium appear to be supportive towards UMS euthanasia and where UMS euthanasia is carried out, mental health nurses are often involved in the preceding decision-making process. Mental health nurses critically reflect on the interpretation and application of the legal euthanasia criteria as experienced in their daily work with their patients, and identify several problems. After a rather quiet period in Belgium, the public ethical debate regarding UMS euthanasia has recently been reopened and intensified. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Sufficient attention must be paid to how mental health nurses can be involved in the process of UMS euthanasia. This applies at several levels: legal, healthcare policy, bedside care and education. Specific attention must be paid within the UMS euthanasia process to ensure adequate cooperation between physicians, nurses and patients. There is a need for proper training in: knowledge of psychiatric pathologies and remaining treatment options; communication skills; the legal framework and all its difficulties; transdisciplinary and multicultural approaches; ethical reflection and how nurses handle their own emotions.

ABSTRACT

Introduction Euthanasia because of unbearable mental suffering (UMS euthanasia) has been legal in Belgium since 2002, under certain circumstances that govern careful practice. Despite the legal framework, there are specific difficulties and concerns regarding UMS euthanasia. Mental health nurses are often involved in the process, but little is known about their attitudes towards UMS euthanasia, their role and their knowledge. Aim To determine the attitudes, role and knowledge of mental health nurses regarding UMS euthanasia. Methods A cross-sectional survey was performed at a convenience sample of four psychiatric hospitals in Belgium (n = 133) as a pilot study. Self-administered questionnaires were provided to mental health nurses. Results Half the nurses in our sample had been involved at least once in the process of UMS euthanasia. A large majority of mental health nurses were supportive of UMS euthanasia. Nurses show differences in attitudes related to the different psychiatric pathologies of the patients, and in whether or not minors are involved. In some cases, they believed that the mental suffering of psychiatric patients can be unbearable and irreversible and that psychiatric patients can be competent to voluntarily request UMS euthanasia. Nurses stated that they have an important role in the UMS euthanasia process, but also demanded more knowledge and clear guidelines to implement the procedure. Discussion Nurses have a key role regarding UMS euthanasia but face several challenges: the recent process, resistance to a multidisciplinary approach by psychiatrists and an unclear role defined by the legal framework. Nurses do not appear to have a common voice on the topic and the development of clear guidelines appears to be essential. Social recovery can offer a way out of an UMS euthanasia request, but it will not always offer a solution. Implications for Practice Sufficient attention must be paid to how mental health nurses can be involved in the process of UMS euthanasia at various levels: bedside practice, healthcare management, education and policy. A form of systematic cooperation between nurses, physicians and patients can contribute to the utmost careful decision-making process needed in these cases. There is a need for proper training in: knowledge of psychiatric pathologies and remaining treatment options; communication skills; the legal framework and all its difficulties; transdisciplinary and multicultural approaches; ethical reflection and how nurses handle their own emotions.

Nurses' views on legalising assisted dying in New Zealand: A cross-sectional study

AIMS

This study investigated New Zealand nurses' views on legalising assisted dying across a range of clinical conditions, nurses' willingness to engage in legal assisted dying, potential deterrents and enablers to such engagement, and nurses' perceptions of the proper role of their professional bodies in relation to legalising assisted dying.

BACKGROUND

A Bill for legalising assisted dying is currently before the New Zealand parliament. Of the 16 jurisdictions where assisted dying has been specifically legislated, only the Canadian federal statute provides nurses with explicit legal protection for their performance of assisted dying-related tasks. An absence of policy development and planning for safe nursing practice prior to legalisation of assisted dying results in a gap in professional support and guidance.

DESIGN

Exploratory cross-sectional survey.

RESPONDENTS

A self-selected sample of 475 New Zealand nurses responded to an anonymous online survey disseminated through the newsletters and websites of relevant medical and nursing professional bodies. A sub-sample of nurses who expressed support for or ambivalence about legalisation (n = 356): rated their level of support for legalising assisted dying in New Zealand across a range of medical conditions, and their willingness to participate in a range of assisted dying tasks; identified barriers and facilitators to potential participation; and assessed the responsibility of the professional bodies to provide practice supports.

METHOD

Mixed-method approach using descriptive analysis of quantitative data; qualitative data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Nurses supported legalisation at a rate (67%) significantly greater than that of doctors (37%) and for a diverse range of medical conditions. Most supporting nurses were willing to engage in the full range of relevant assisted dying roles. They identified several practical and ethical supports as essential to safe engagement, in particular practice guidelines, specific training, legal protections, clinical supervision and mentoring, and independent review of assisted dying service provision. They saw the facilitation of these supports as primarily the responsibility of their professional bodies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY

Nursing bodies should proactively facilitate workforce awareness and development of assisted dying policy and practice supports in anticipation of legalisation. This can be done through information campaigns and by adapting assisted dying policy, practice materials and systems already developed internationally. Nursing bodies need to engage in formulating legislation to ensure inclusion of explicit protections for participating nurses and to delegate relevant responsibilities to regulatory bodies.

Nurses attitudes towards death, dying patients and euthanasia: A descriptive study

Background:

Attitudes of nurses towards death and related concepts influence end-of-life care. Determining nurses’ views and attitudes towards these concepts and the factors that affect them are necessary to ensure quality end-of-life care.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to determine nurses’ views and attitudes about death, dying patient, euthanasia and the relationships between nurses’ characteristics.

Methods:

Participants consist of the nurses who volunteered to take part in this descriptive study from 25 hospitals (n = 340) which has a paediatric or adult intensive care unit and located within the boundaries of Ankara, Turkey. ‘Nurse Information Form’ and ‘Attitude Scale about Euthanasia, Death and Dying Patients (DAS)’ were used as data collection tool.

Ethical consideration:

Written permissions were received from the ‘Noninterventional Clinical Researches Ethics Board’ of authors’ university and education councils of each hospital. Informed consent was obtained from participants.

Findings:

It is found that there are statistically significant difference among the factors of marital status, having a child, years of experience, bereavement experience, affected by working with dying patient, definition of euthanasia, views about patients who are appropriate for euthanasia, views about patients who desire to die and feeling need for counselling on these concepts according to the mean total score of nurses’ attitudes about euthanasia, death and dying patient (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

The results indicate that nurses are negatively affected to face the concepts of death, euthanasia and work with dying patient. This is reflected in their attitude. In order to gain positive attitude towards death, dying patient and euthanasia, the implementation of training and consulting services to nurses at appropriate intervals during both education and professional life are required.

Finnish nurses’ attitudes towards their role in the euthanasia process

Background:

Nurses’ voices remain unheard in most debates about euthanasia, although their crucial role in the euthanasia process is widely acknowledged. Moreover, in Canadian euthanasia law, nurses have a more active role, which further highlights the need for knowledge about nurses’ attitudes towards their role in the euthanasia process.

Research questions:

What are Finnish nurses’ attitudes towards their potential role in the euthanasia process? Which characteristics are associated with those attitudes?

Research design:

Cross-sectional web-based survey.

Participants and research context:

1003 nurses, recruited via social media and the members’ bulletin of the Finnish Nurses Association.

Ethical considerations:

Ethical approval was obtained from the Committee on Research Ethics of the university to which the first author was affiliated.

Findings:

The great majority (85.2%) of nurses felt that their perspective should be considered in decision-making related to euthanasia. Furthermore, most of the participants (74.7%) reported willingness to participate in the euthanasia process if it were legal, and 88.6% agreed that a nurse should be present when euthanasia is performed if the patient wishes so. Furthermore, over half agreed that some of the preparatory tasks were part of their job description. However, a minority (32.9%) agreed with a possible obligation to participate based on their profession. Nurses’ age, religiosity and educational level influenced their attitudes in the current results.

Discussion:

Despite the strong agreement on decision-making concerning euthanasia and participation in the euthanasia process, obligation to participate based on the profession was rejected by most participants. Nurses regarded themselves as consultants in the decision-making process, which may indicate their unwillingness to share the responsibility for the decision itself.

Conclusion:

Specific safety mechanisms should be considered to protect nurses who refuse to be involved in the euthanasia process due to harm that involuntary participation might cause.

Response to LiPuma and DeMarco's Article on "Hastening Death"

The paper “Palliative care and patient autonomy: moving beyond prohibitions against hastening death” by LiPuma and DeMarco deals with an aspect of end of life care which is the source of considerable disagreement. It is important to emphasize that autonomy is not the unique feature for end of life care. There is always a medical and ethical commitment to care, i.e. beneficence and nonmaleficence. All of these aspects have to be taken into account when treating patients at the very end of life. There is considerable scientific proof indicating that most patients and families can experience a death in dignity when being cared for in palliative care or hospice units.

Nurses’ attitudes towards euthanasia in conflict with professional ethical guidelines

Background:

Despite the significant role of nurses in end-of-life care, their attitudes towards euthanasia are under-represented both in the current literature and the controversial debate that is ongoing in several countries.

Research questions:

What are the attitudes towards euthanasia among Finnish nurses? Which characteristics are associated with those attitudes?

Research design:

Cross-sectional web-based survey.

Participants and research context:

A total of 1003 nurses recruited via the members’ bulletin of the Finnish Nurses Association and social media.

Ethical considerations:

Ethical approval was obtained from the Committee on Research Ethics of the university to which the authors were affiliated.

Findings:

The majority (74.3%) of the participants would accept euthanasia as part of Finnish healthcare, and 61.8% considered that Finland would benefit from a law permitting euthanasia. Most of the nurses (89.9%) thought that a person must have the right to decide on his or her own death; 77.4% of them considered it likely that they would themselves make a request for euthanasia in certain situations.

Discussion:

The value of self-determination and the ability to choose the moment and manner of one’s death are emphasized in the nurses’ attitudes towards euthanasia.

Conclusion:

A continuous dialogue about euthanasia and nurses’ shared values is crucial due to the conflict between nurses’ attitudes and current ethical guidelines on nursing.