What not to do: Choosing wisely in nursing care

What Can Free Nursing Schools Do for Anarchism? A Reflection on "What Can Anarchism Do for Nursing" by Martin and Laurin (2023)

This is a response on the interesting read "What can anarchism do for nursing" by Martin and Laurin (2023), published in a previous issue of this journal. My foremost point is congratulating the authors on emphasizing the urgent need for a deviant voice or movement within nursing. It is a needed and necessary plea. Without such a voice or movement, which deviates from the current discourse(s) in healthcare, the future of our healthcare systems are looking grim and perhaps even more authoritarian than their current state. Rather than providing a comment to their work, I deemed it useful to make two additions and one suggestion to their essay. I would like to elaborate on (1) why alternative education is crucial in installing this type of thinking and action in nursing and (2) why, next to the concept of mutual aid, the concept of individual deviant action by nurses can be crucial in installing a new paradigm in nursing. I argue that both alternative education and individual action cannot be fostered by the traditional nursing education and common career paths and propose the reinvention of the concept of free (nursing) schools. Such free school could empower nurses, throughout their career, to acquire a general culture in which critical reflection and political awareness are cornerstones to identify the balances of power which affects them. This could enhance the solidarity between nurses and unity in the nursing profession. At the end of this reflection, I outline the principles of these free nursing schools.

Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization defines quality of care as providing effective, evidence-based care, and avoiding harm. Low-value care provides little or no benefit to the patient, causes harm, and wastes limited resources. In 2017, shortly after the start of the International Choosing Wisely campaign, the first Dutch nursing "Do-not-do" list was published and has become a widely used practical tool for nurses working in daily practice. However, over the last years new guidelines are published. Therefore, an update of the list is necessary with an addition of high-value care recommendations as alternative care practices for low-value care.

DESIGN/METHODS

In this study, a combination of designs was used. First, we searched Dutch clinical practice guidelines for low-value or high-value care recommendations. All nursing care recommendations were assessed and specified to several healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care, and mental health care. Second, a prioritization among nurses regarding low-value care recommendations was done by a cross-sectional survey for each healthcare sector.

RESULTS

In total, 66 low-value care recommendations were found, for example, "avoid unnecessary layers under the patient at risk of pressure ulcers" and "never flush the bladder to prevent urinary tract infection." Furthermore, 414 high-value care recommendations were selected, such as "use the Barthel Index to assess and to evaluate the degree of ADL independence" and "application of cold therapy may be considered for oncological patients with pain." In total, 539 nurses from all healthcare sectors prioritized the low-value care recommendations, resulting in a top five low-value care practices per healthcare sector. The top five low-value care recommendations differed per healthcare sector, although "do not use physical restraints in case of a delirium" was prioritized by four out of five sectors.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing low-value and high-value care recommendations for nurses will help and inspire nurses to deliver fundamental care for their patients. These initiatives regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous quality improvement based on evidence. This is also essential to meeting the current challenges of the healthcare delivery system.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This paper provides an update of low-value care recommendations for nurses based on Dutch guidelines from 2017 to 2023, specified to five healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care and mental health care, with an accompanying prioritization of these low-value care recommendations to facilitate de-implementation. This paper provides a first overview of high-value care recommendations to reflect on and create alternative care practices for low-value care. The recommendations regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous improvement of appropriateness based on evidence, finally leading to better quality of care and improving patient outcomes.

Low-value health care, de-implementation, and implications for nursing research: A discussion paper

Globally, the nursing profession constitutes the largest proportion of the health workforce; however, it is challenged by widespread workforce shortages relative to need. Strategies to promote recruitment of the nursing workforce are well-established, with a lesser focus on strategies to alleviate the burden on the existing workforce. This burden may be exacerbated by the impact of low-value health care, characterised as health care that provides little or no benefit for patients, or has the potential to cause harm. Low-value health care is a global problem, a major contributor to the waste of healthcare resources, and a key focus of health system reform. Evidence of variation in low-value health care has been identified across countries and system levels. Research on low-value health care has largely focused on the medical profession, with a paucity of research examining either low-value health care or the de-implementation of low-value health care from a nursing perspective. The objective of this paper is to provide a scholarly discussion of the literature around low-value health care and de-implementation, with the purpose of identifying implications for nursing research. With increasing pressures on the global nursing workforce, research identifying low-value health care and developing approaches to de-implement this care, is crucial.

The impact of COVID-19 on Australian clinicians' decision making in line with the principles of Choosing Wisely

AIM

To explore the perspectives of clinicians' decision-making processes and considerations in line with the Choosing Wisely principles during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN

An exploratory qualitative approach was used.

METHODS

Data were collected via semi-structured interviews to encourage participants to discuss their own experience in making clinical decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 12 clinicians from across disciplines were interviewed to reach data saturation. Interview data were analysed considering the Choosing Wisely principles.

RESULTS

Five main themes as they relate to clinician decision-making emerged and included; prioritizing care and treatment, uncertainty regarding best practice as a result of rapidly changing guidelines, organizational challenges to clinical decision-making, the use of telehealth and enabling consumer engagement with health services.

CONCLUSION

Despite the disruption caused by COVID-19, clinicians were mindful of necessary care and worked to ensure that core care was not compromised during the first wave of the pandemic. The need for clinicians to protect both their own safety and that of their colleagues arose as an additional factor that influenced clinicians' decision-making process during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Low-value wound care: Are nurses and physicians choosing wisely? A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Choosing Wisely is an international movement that stimulates conversations about unnecessary care. The campaign created five recommendations including a statement that less wound care is sometimes better.

AIMS

The study aims to evaluate nurses' and physicians' adherence to the Choosing Wisely recommendations for acute wound care in the Netherlands and the barriers and facilitators to improve this.

DESIGN

This is a mixed methods study using a survey and interviews.

METHODS

The survey was completed by 171 nurses and 71 physicians from November 2017 to February 2018. A total of 17 nurses and 6 physicians were interviewed.

RESULTS

Awareness of the five recommendations ranged from 62% to 89% for nurses and 46% to 85% for physicians. However, up to 15% of the nurses and 28% of physicians were aware but did not adhere to the recommendations. Barriers to adhering were a lack of knowledge, the work environment and perceptions of patients' preferences. Repeated attention, cost-consciousness and an open culture facilitated the implementation.

CONCLUSION

Although most nurses and physicians were aware of the recommendations, not all adhered to them. Increasing awareness is not enough for successful implementation. A tailored approach that removes the barriers is necessary, such as increasing knowledge about wounds and changing the work environment.

Developing an Evidence-Based Nursing Culture in Nursing Homes: An Action Research Study

Background: Nursing homes face challenges caused by increasing numbers of older adults with multimorbidity and the demand for quality of care. Developing an evidence-based nursing (EBN) culture is a promising strategy to face these challenges. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an EBN culture in nursing homes and gain insight into the influencing factors. Methods: An action research study was conducted with 12 nursing teams in 4 Dutch nursing homes, using the Practice Development approach to develop an EBN culture. The teams (mostly certified nurse assistants) were coached by internal facilitators (bachelor’s or master’s degree nurses) and external facilitators (nursing teachers). Data were gathered at baseline and after 15 months using questionnaires and individual and focus group interviews. Results: With varying degrees, most nursing teams implemented elements (related to values, attitudes, and behaviors) of an EBN culture with appropriate leadership, advocacy, and training. The team members became open to new insights and asked critical questions. During the project, participants learned how EBN could be incorporated into daily practice, for example, by keeping it small, discussing information from professional journals, and using creative methods such as quizzes. Influencing factors of an EBN culture were: (a) support of managers, (b) inspiring facilitators close to the team, and (c) stable teams with driving forces and student nurses. Conclusions: Integrating EBN into daily practice in creative and motivating ways contributes to the development of an EBN culture in nursing homes. To facilitate this, managers should support teams in the process and content of EBN, and internal facilitators should collaborate with driving forces on the teams.

Fasting habits over a 10-year period: An observational study on adherence to preoperative fasting and postoperative restoration of oral intake in 2 Dutch hospitals

BACKGROUND

Since 1999, international guidelines recommend fasting from solid foods up to 6 hours and clear liquids up to 2 hours before surgery. Early recovery after surgery programs recommend restoration of oral intake as soon as possible. This study determines adherence to these guidelines up to 20 years after its introduction.

METHODS

A 2-center observational study with a 10-year interval was performed in the Netherlands. In period 1 (2009), preoperative fasting time was observed as primary outcome. In period 2 (2019), preoperative fasting and postoperative restoration of oral intake were observed. Fasting times were collected using an interview-assisted questionnaire.

RESULTS

During both periods, 311 patients were included from vascular, trauma, orthopedic, urological, oncological, gastrointestinal, and ear-nose-throat and maxillary surgical units. Duration of preoperative fasting was prolonged in 290 (90.3%) patients for solid foods and in 208 (67.8%) patients for clear liquids. Median duration of preoperative fasting from solid foods and clear liquids was respectively 2.5 and 3 times the recommended 6 and 2 hours, with no improvements from one period to another. Postoperative food intake was resumed within 4 hours in 30.7% of the patients. Median duration of perioperative fasting was 23:46 hours (interquartile range 20:00-30:30 hours) for solid foods and 11:00 hours (interquartile range 7:53-16:00 hours) for clear liquids.

CONCLUSION

Old habits die hard. Despite 20 years of fasting guidelines, surgical patients are still exposed erroneously to prolonged fasting in 2 hospitals. Patients should be encouraged to eat and drink until 6 and 2 hours, respectively, before surgery and to restart eating after surgery.

Effects of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing low-value nursing procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In the last decade, there is an increasing focus on detecting and compiling lists of low-value nursing procedures. However, less is known about effective de-implementation strategies for these procedures. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence of effective strategies to de-implement low-value nursing procedures.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched till January 2020. Additionally, reference lists and citations of the included studies were searched. Studies were included that described de-implementation of low-value nursing procedures, i.e., procedures, test, or drug orders by nurses or nurse practitioners. PRISMA guideline was followed, and the ‘Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care’ (EPOC) taxonomy was used to categorize de-implementation strategies. A meta-analysis was performed for the volume of low-value nursing procedures in controlled studies, and Mantel–Haenszel risk ratios (95% CI) were calculated using a random effects model.

Results

Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. Studies used a (cluster) randomized design (n = 10), controlled before-after design (n = 5), and an uncontrolled before-after design (n = 12). Low-value nursing procedures performed by nurses and/or nurse specialists that were found in this study were restraint use (n = 20), inappropriate antibiotic prescribing (n = 3), indwelling or unnecessary urinary catheters use (n = 2), ordering unnecessary liver function tests (n = 1), and unnecessary antipsychotic prescribing (n = 1). Fourteen studies showed a significant reduction in low-value nursing procedures. Thirteen of these 14 studies included an educational component within their de-implementation strategy. Twelve controlled studies were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses for study design showed no statistically significant subgroup effect for the volume of low-value nursing procedures (p = 0.20).

Conclusions

The majority of the studies with a positive significant effect used a de-implementation strategy with an educational component. Unfortunately, no conclusions can be drawn about which strategy is most effective for reducing low-value nursing care due to a high level of heterogeneity and a lack of studies. We recommend that future studies better report the effects of de-implementation strategies and perform a process evaluation to determine to which extent the strategy has been used.

Trial registration

The review is registered in Prospero (CRD42018105100).