Making clinical care decisions with people living with dementia in hospital: An integrative literature review

Care Decisions in the Hospital: Challenges for Family Members of Hospitalized Persons With Dementia

CONTEXT

Family members of hospitalized persons living with dementia (PLWD) often face complex, high-stakes decisions and experience significant psychological distress. Prior studies of hospitalized patients have focused on the ethical, intrapersonal, and communication-related challenges specific to surrogate decision-making, but few have explored challenges specific to families of PLWD.

OBJECTIVES

To understand challenges faced by family members of hospitalized older PLWD as they navigate care decisions.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study of family members of hospitalized PLWD from February to December 2020. Hospitalized patients >50 years old with an ICD-coded diagnosis of dementia were identified from the EHR along with at least one family member, and approached for a semistructured interview about decision-making experiences. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded by seven investigators using an inductive and constant comparative approach.

RESULTS

Thirty family members completed interviews for 26 unique PLWD. Mean participant age was 62.6 years; 66.7% were female and most identified as the PLWD's adult child (53.3%) or spouse (26.7%). The following themes emerged: 1) determining the PLWD's quality of life, 2) navigating uncertainty in the context of dementia and acute hospitalization, 3) translating PLWD's preferences into high-stakes decisions within the context of progressive cognitive impairment, and 4) unique decision-making challenges related to the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Family members of hospitalized PLWD faced dementia-specific challenges when making care decisions. Interventions that account for these challenges are needed to better support family members of hospitalized PLWD as they navigate these decisions.

Are we on the same page? Multiple stakeholders and service users priorities for dementia care and policy: A Delphi study

BACKGROUND

It's crucial to develop a national policy for dementia due to the growing number of persons living with the condition and the attendant impact on individuals, families, and society at large. However, there has been limited exploration of the views on long-term goals for dementia of different stakeholders involved in different aspects of service use, planning or delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine and compare the perceived priorities of service users (i.e., people living with dementia and their family caregivers) and other multiple stakeholders for dementia care and policy.

DESIGN

Two independent Delphi studies were conducted in Hong Kong.

SETTING(S) AND PARTICIPANTS

In Delphi study 1, 75 stakeholders were recruited from public and private nursing, medical and social care providers, philanthropic organizations, policy-makers and government sectors. In Delphi study 2, 45 people living with dementia and 55 family caregivers were recruited from community care settings.

METHODS

The Delphi study 1 was conducted using online surveys, while the Delphi study 2 was conducted using phone interviews. Each Delphi study comprised a qualitative study for exploring the range of views of the two panels and a quantitative validation for generating consensus. We systematically compared the two panels' identified priorities in terms of contents and consensus levels.

RESULTS

Multiple stakeholders identified 32 consensus-based statements and service users identified 25 statements, most of which achieved moderate to high level of consensus. Through content analysis, statements from the two panels were converged into six common themes: (1) early prevention, detection and referral systems for dementia, (2) care and intervention services, (3) health and social care workforce capacity building within and across service sectors, (4) supportive services for family caregivers, (5) development of longer-term dementia service planning and a policy framework, and (6) promotion of a dementia-friendly community. Despite the similarity of the themes expressed by the two panels, critical comparison of their priorities identified the dementia service and policy gaps in providing integrated and informed healthcare, a mechanism for sensitive care allocation, enabling seamless social inclusion, and proactive health orientation of dementia caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between two panels reflect the distinctive value of service user engagement in the policy-making process. Our findings have implications for developing a multi-disciplinary integrated action plan for the local health response across the primary and secondary care settings to dementia and expanding the practice scope of person-centered dementia care in a collaborative way.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

The voices of user, caregivers and service stakeholders excel the person-centered care and policy context for integrated dementia care.