When and how should I transfuse during obstetric hemorrhage?

Hemolytic reaction after major and minor compatible blood transfusion for a cesarean section patient in a resource-limited area: A case report

INTRODUCTION

A hemolytic transfusion reaction is the destruction of red blood cells caused by immunological incompatibility between the donor and the recipient, not only incompatibility but also, rarely, compatible blood transfusion, which may cause a hemolytic transfusion reaction. A hemolytic transfusion reaction occurs when the transfusion causes symptoms as well as clinical or laboratory indicators of increased red cell death.

PATIENT PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 27-year-old Gravida II Para I mother who was blood group AB positive with anaemia, hypotension secondary to antepartum hemorrhage, and a mentally conscious mother who was transferred to our obstetric emergency operation theatre. As she experienced bleeding on arrival, we assessed the patient's history and performed anaesthesia-related physical examinations, such as cardiovascular examination, respiratory examination, central nerve system examination, and airway examination. We followed the patient postoperatively until discharge from the hospital, and 12.9 g/dl hemoglobin, 36.3 % haematocrit, 402 × 103 platelet count, and 0.9 mg/dl creatinine were detected. After satisfactory postoperative vital signs and laboratory results were obtained, the patient was discharged from the hospital after 3 days.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Acute hemolytic transfusion is a medical emergency with an estimated frequency of one per 70,000 blood product transfusions and an estimated fatality rate of five per 10 million RBC unit transfusions. Importantly, the traditional triad of fever, flank pain, and red or dark urine is uncommon. However, these symptoms may not be immediately visible if the patient is under anaesthesia; in such circumstances, seeping from venipuncture and dark urine caused by DIC and hemoglobinuria, respectively, may be the only observations.

CONCLUSION

Blood transfusion is performed in 0.5-3 % of women with obstetric hemorrhage and accounts for 1 % of all transfused blood products in high-income countries. Anesthesiologists face a significant issue in identifying the necessity for transfusion in patients with obstetric hemorrhage. Hemolytic reactions after blood transfusion are common during emergency patient management. For this reason, the World Health Organization has developed guidelines for early detection and management.

Management of massive haemorrhage in transfusion medicine services in the Middle East and North Africa

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are critical in managing haemorrhage, yet their utilization varies. There is lack of data on the utilization of MTPs in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study aims to assess the degree of utilization of MTPs in the region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a survey to collect data on MTP use, inviting medical directors of transfusion services from various hospitals. Data were analysed to determine the prevalence of MTP utilization, their compositions, challenges in application and areas of future need.

RESULTS

Eighteen respondents participated, representing 11 countries in the region. Thirteen hospitals implemented MTP, and eight included paediatrics. Eleven institutions used more than one definition of massive haemorrhage, with the most common being ≥10 red blood cell (RBC) units transfused for adults and replacement of >50% total blood volume in paediatrics. The majority of sites with MTPs utilized 1:1:1 RBCs:platelets:plasma ratio (70%). Variations were observed in the types and blood groups of components used. Two sites utilized whole blood, while six are considering it for future use. Utilization of adjunctive agents and frequency of laboratory testing varied among the sites. Challenges included the lack of medical expertise in protocol development, adherence and paediatric application. The need assessment emphasized the need for developing regional guidelines, standardized protocols and training initiatives.

CONCLUSION

Although several hospitals have adopted MTPs, variations exist in activation criteria, blood product ratios and monitoring. Challenges include the lack of medical expertise, protocol adherence and addressing paediatric needs. Standardizing protocols, enhancing training and paediatric application are crucial for improving massive transfusion management in the region.

Effects of transfusing older red blood cells and platelets on obstetric patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations between transfusion of blood products close to the end of shelf-life and clinical outcomes in obstetric inpatients.

METHODS

Mortality and morbidity were compared in patients transfused exclusively with red blood cells (RBC) stored for less than 21 days (fresh) versus RBC stored for 35 days or longer (old), and platelets (PLT) stored for 3 days or fewer (fresh) versus 4 days or longer (old) in Queensland, Australia from 2007 to 2013. Multivariable models were used to examine associations between these groups of blood products and clinical end points.

RESULTS

There were 3371 patients who received RBC and 280 patients who received PLT of the eligible storage durations. Patients transfused with old RBC received fewer transfusions (2.7 ± 1.8 vs. 2.3 ± 1.0 units; P < 0.001). However, a higher rate of single-unit transfusions was also seen in those patients who exclusively received old RBC (252 [9.3%] vs. 92 [13.7%]; P = 0.003). Comparison of fresh vs. old blood products revealed no differences in the quantities of transfused RBC (9.5 ± 5.9 vs. 9.1 ± 5.2 units; P = 0.680) or PLT (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.1 units; P = 0.301) as well as the length of hospital stay for RBC (3 [2-5] vs. 3 [2-5] days; P = 0.124) or PLT (5 [4-8] vs. 6 [4-9] days; P = 0.120).

CONCLUSION

Transfusing exclusively older RBC or PLT was not associated with increased morbidity or mortality.

Postpartum haemorrhage in high-resource settings: Variations in clinical management and future research directions based on a comparative study of national guidelines

OBJECTIVE

To compare guidelines from eight high-income countries on prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), with a particular focus on severe PPH.

DESIGN

Comparative study.

SETTING

High-resource countries.

POPULATION

Women with PPH.

METHODS

Systematic comparison of guidance on PPH from eight high-income countries.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Definition of PPH, prophylactic management, measurement of blood loss, initial PPH-management, second-line uterotonics, non-pharmacological management, resuscitation/transfusion management, organisation of care, quality/methodological rigour.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights areas where strong evidence is lacking. There is need for a universal definition of (severe) PPH. Consensus is required on how and when to quantify blood loss to identify PPH promptly. Future research may focus on timing and sequence of second-line uterotonics and non-pharmacological interventions and how these impact maternal outcome. Until more data are available, different transfusion strategies will be applied. The use of clear transfusion-protocols are nonetheless recommended to reduce delays in initiation. There is a need for a collaborative effort to develop standardised, evidence-based PPH guidelines.

RESULTS

Definitions of (severe) PPH varied as to the applied cut-off of blood loss and incorporation of clinical parameters. Dose and mode of administration of prophylactic uterotonics and methods of blood loss measurement were heterogeneous. Recommendations on second-line uterotonics differed as to type and dose. Obstetric management diverged particularly regarding procedures for uterine atony. Recommendations on transfusion approaches varied with different thresholds for blood transfusion and supplementation of haemostatic agents. Quality of guidelines varied considerably.

Patient blood management to minimize transfusions during the postpartum period

Patient blood management is an evidence-based concept that seeks to minimize blood loss by maintaining adequate hemoglobin levels and optimizing hemostasis during surgery. Since the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, patient blood management has gained significance due to fewer blood donations and reduced amounts of blood stored for transfusion. Recently, the prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), as well as the frequency of PPH-associated transfusions, has steadily increased. Therefore, proper blood transfusion is required to minimize PPH-associated complications while saving the patient's life. Several guidelines have attempted to apply this concept to minimize anemia during pregnancy and bleeding during delivery, prevent bleeding after delivery, and optimize recovery methods from anemia. This study systematically reviewed various guidelines to determine blood loss management in pregnant women.

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

Comparison between the Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) Delta device against the Cartridge-based Thromboelastography 6s and Quantra in a healthy third trimester pregnant cohort

Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) Delta has been described in several postpartum hemorrhage algorithms, but this device requires pipetting and careful mixing of reagents to initiate the clotting reaction. In contrast, thromboelastography (TEG 6s) and the Quantra devices operate utilizing an automated pre-mixed cartridge that only requires a blood sample to start the clot strength analysis. We compared the correlation between 3 point of care viscoelastic testing (POCVT) devices to laboratory Clauss fibrinogen and platelets, their inter-device correlation, and the total running time difference between Quantra and ROTEM. A high correlation was noted between the Clauss fibrinogen and the fibrinogen parameters from ROTEM (r = 0.76-0.84, P < 0.0001), TEG6s (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001) and Quantra (r = 0.72, P = 0.0001). A moderate correlation between laboratory platelets and the ROTEM (r = 0.54;0.45, P < 0.0001; P = 0.0013) and Quantra (r = 0.66, P = 0.0001) parameters was noted. The inter-device correlation showed to be high when comparing the fibrinogen parameters of TEG6s and Quantra to that of ROTEM (r = 0.88 and 0.74, P < 0.0001, respectively). In contrast, a moderate correlation was noted between the platelet parameters of Quantra and ROTEM (r = 0.51, p = 0.0036). The Quantra device resulted 20.9 min (95% CI -0.2 to 4.7, P = 0.07) faster than the ROTEM if the warming and pipetting of reagents of the latter were considered. All the POCVT devices demonstrated a high correlation to laboratory Clauss fibrinogen, making each beneficial for the early recognition and management of hypofibrinogenemia.

Emergencies in obstetric anaesthesia: a narrative review

We conducted a narrative review in six areas of obstetric emergencies: category-1 caesarean section; difficult and failed airway; massive obstetric haemorrhage; hypertensive crisis; emergencies related to neuraxial anaesthesia; and maternal cardiac arrest. These areas represent significant research published within the last five years, with emphasis on large multicentre randomised trials, national or international practice guidelines and recommendations from major professional societies. Key topics discussed: prevention and management of failed neuraxial technique; role of high-flow nasal oxygenation and choice of neuromuscular drug in obstetric patients; prevention of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia; management of the difficult and failed obstetric airway; current perspectives on the use of tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate and cell salvage; guidance on neuraxial placement in a thrombocytopenic obstetric patient; management of neuraxial drug errors, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and unusually prolonged neuraxial block regression; and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in maternal cardiac arrest.

Latest advances in postpartum hemorrhage management

Hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. A maternal health priority is improving how healthcare providers prevent and manage postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Because anesthesiologists can help facilitate how hospitals develop approaches for PPH prevention and anticipatory planning, we review the potential utility of PPH risk-assessment tools, bundles, and protocols. Anesthesiologists rely on clinical and diagnostic information for initiating and evaluating medical management. Therefore, we review modalities for measuring blood loss after delivery, which includes visual, volumetric, gravimetric, and colorimetric approaches. Point-of-care technologies for assessing changes in central hemodynamics (ultrasonography) and coagulation profiles (rotational thromboelastometry and thromboelastography) are also discussed. Anesthesiologists play a critical role in the medical and transfusion management of PPH. Therefore, we review blood ordering and massive transfusion protocols, fixed-ratio vs. goal-directed transfusion approaches, coagulation changes during PPH, and the potential clinical utility of the pharmacological adjuncts, tranexamic acid, and fibrinogen concentrate.

Obstetrical Hemorrhage

Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Prevention includes identifying patients with risk factors and actively managing the third stage of labor. The anesthesiologist should be ready to manage hemorrhage with general strategies as well as strategies tailored to the specific cause of hemorrhage. Both neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia are appropriate in different situations. Treatments proven to be effective include increasing the oxytocin infusion, administering tranexamic acid early, guiding transfusion with point-of-care tests, and using cell salvage. Utilization of protocols and checklists within systems that encourage effective communication between teams should be implemented.