1
|
Pu JJ, Lo AWI, Wong MCM, Choi WS, Ho G, Yang WF, Su YX. A quantitative comparison of bone resection margin distances in virtual surgical planning versus histopathology: a prospective study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:111-118. [PMID: 37737999 PMCID: PMC10793803 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positive bone margins have been shown to be associated with worse locoregional control and survival performance in oral oncology patients. With the application of computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific surgical guides, the authors can accurately execute the preoperative osteotomy plan. However, how well the authors can predict the margin distance in the final histopathology with a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, the factors associated with it, and how much leeway CT should spare when designing the osteotomy planes during virtual surgical planning (VSP) remain to be investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients from January 2021 to December 2022 with benign or malignant jaw tumors and with signs of bone marrow involvement in the preoperative CT scan in our center were prospectively recruited to the study. VSP and measurement of the closest margin distance in the CT scan were performed by the single team of surgeons. The resection specimen was processed, and the margin distances were measured by a dedicated senior pathologist with the knowledge of orientation of the osteotomy planes. RESULTS A total of 35 patients were recruited, with 21 malignant and 14 benign cases. Sixty-eight bone margins were quantitatively analyzed. No significant difference in margin distances measured from the CT scan and final histopathology was detected ( P =0.19), and there was a strong correlation between the two (r s =0.74, P <0.01). A considerable amount of variance was detected in the level of discrepancy between margin distances measured in the CT scan and final histopathology (overall SD=6.26 mm, malignancy SD=7.44 mm, benign SD=4.40 mm). No significant correlation existed between the two margin distances when only maxilla tumor margins were assessed ( P =0.16). CONCLUSION The bone margin distance in VSP is reliably correlated to the final pathological margin distance. A leeway distance of 15mm and 9mm should be considered when designing the osteotomy planes for malignancy and benign cases, respectively. Extra attention should be paid to maxilla cases when predetermining the osteotomy planes during VSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane J. Pu
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
| | | | - May C. M. Wong
- Division of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong
| | | | - Grace Ho
- Department of Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lamy M, La Rosa S, May L, Broome M. Surgical Margins in 3D Planned Mandibular Resections for Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Oral Cavity. J Craniofac Surg 2023; 34:e225-e228. [PMID: 36730970 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000009068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Three-dimensional (3D) planned mandibular resections using cutting guides and preplanned plates are now widely used in oncological surgery. The main advantages are the gain of time, precision, and esthetic outcomes. The drawbacks include costs, time for planning, and printing the surgical tools. This time between the radiological data and the surgery may allow tumor progression, rendering the custom-made guides useless. There is no consensus regarding surgical margins that should be planned to ensure a safe oncologic outcome. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate if the planned bony margins are adequate. MATERIALS AND METHODS Inclusion criteria were: Squamous cell carcinomas of the anterior and lateral floor of mouth with mandibular invasion (T4); mandibular resection using 3D planning and cutting guides. Between June 2015 to December 2019, 16 patients met the criteria. The time between the planning and the surgery was recorded. The authors decided to use a margin of at least 1 cm on the preoperative computerized tomography scans on each side of the tumors in our planning for all patients. The authors then measured the distance of the bone resection on the pathological specimen. RESULTS All 16 patients had safe bone surgical margins (R0). The average time from the scanners used for the planning to the surgery was 33 days. DISCUSSION All the cutting guides could be used. The pathology examination showed safe oncological margins and no patients required further resection. A 1 cm margin during 3D planning for mandibular resections with 3D printed cutting guides, in patients with T4 Squamous Cell Carcinomas can therefore be considered safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Lamy
- Service of Ear Nose and Throat and Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva
| | - Stefano La Rosa
- Institute of Pathology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Laurence May
- Division of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital
| | - Martin Broome
- Division of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery Guideline Task Force, Joo YH, Cho JK, Koo BS, Kwon M, Kwon SK, Kwon SY, Kim MS, Kim JK, Kim H, Nam I, Roh JL, Park YM, Park IS, Park JJ, Shin SC, Ahn SH, Won S, Ryu CH, Yoon TM, Lee G, Lee DY, Lee MC, Lee JK, Lee JC, Lim JY, Chang JW, Jang JY, Chung MK, Jung YS, Cho JG, Choi YS, Choi JS, Lee GH, Chung PS. Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 12:107-144. [PMID: 30703871 PMCID: PMC6453784 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2018.01816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to provide guidance on the implementation of a surgical treatment of oral cancer. MEDLINE databases were searched for articles on subjects related to "surgical management of oral cancer" published in English. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. The quality of evidence was rated with use RoBANS (Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies) and AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Evidence-based recommendations for practice were ranked according to the American College of Physicians grading system. Additional directives are provided as expert opinions and Delphi questionnaire when insufficient evidence existed. The Committee developed 68 evidence-based recommendations in 34 categories intended to assist clinicians and patients and counselors, and health policy-makers. Proper surgical treatment selection for oral cancer, which is directed by patient- and subsite-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. These guidelines are intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient's treatment goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery Guideline Task Force
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Young-Hoon Joo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Keun Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Bon Seok Koo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Minsu Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Seong Keun Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soon Young Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min-Su Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jeong Kyu Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Heejin Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Innchul Nam
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Lyel Roh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Min Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il-Seok Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Je Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Sung-Chan Shin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Soon-Hyun Ahn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seongjun Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Chang Hwan Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae Mi Yoon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Giljoon Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Doh Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung-Chul Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Kyoo Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Jin Choon Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jae-Yol Lim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Won Chang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jeon Yeob Jang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Man Ki Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yuh-Seok Jung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae-Gu Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Seok Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jeong-Seok Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Guk Haeng Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Phil-Sang Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Haase C, Lethaus B, Knüchel-Clarke R, Hölzle F, Cassataro A, Braunschweig T. Development of a Rapid Analysis Method for Bone Resection Margins for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Immunoblotting. Head Neck Pathol 2018; 12:210-220. [PMID: 28929330 PMCID: PMC5953878 DOI: 10.1007/s12105-017-0856-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this proof-of-principle study was to develop a rapid and approachable method to analyse bone resection margins in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in an intraoperative setting, similar to assessing frozen sections of soft tissue. Bone excision and risk of remaining tumour cells could be minimised, thus improving reconstruction measures and facilitating convalescence. Frozen, sawed wafers of porcine bone artificially combined with porcine skin (simulating OSCC properties) were used to develop and evaluate a new molecular method: protein transfer from non-decalcified, sawed wafers onto a membrane stained by immunofluorescence (Tissue-ProtTrans). Tissue-ProtTrans was based on the detection of keratin 5/6 as a marker of tumour cells. The results were compared to standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) and H&E results of the same wafers after decalcification. Tissue-ProtTrans resulted in a total assay time of 3.5 h using the Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Transfer System (Bio-Rad) for protein transfer. Amersham Protran® Premium Nitrocellulose Membranes 0.2 µm (GE Healthcare) were stained with a primary antibody to keratin 5/6 (Dako Agilent) and a secondary antibody labelled with IRDye® 800CW (LI-COR). Visualisation was performed with an infrared laser scanner (Odyssey). Upon comparison, five independent experiments on porcine specimens processed with the Tissue-ProtTrans showed similar results to standard IHC and H&E analysis. In comparison to standard IHC results (requiring several days due to decalcification) Tissue-ProtTrans provided similar results, but was much faster (3.5 h). This highly promising method has good potential for further time reduction and will be suitable for intraoperative assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Haase
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Bernd Lethaus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Frank Hölzle
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Angela Cassataro
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Till Braunschweig
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|