1
|
Zhang Q, Abdelrehem A, Qu XZ, Zhang CP, Ong HS. Radiographic analysis of critical anatomical structures for pterygoid implant placement in Chinese patients with a severely atrophied maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 52:998-1004. [PMID: 36710239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
The pterygoid implant is a feasible alternative for posterior dental rehabilitation without grafting; however, the ideal pterygoid implant placement continues to be debated. The aim of this study was to identify effective landmarks and establish valid guidelines to determine the ideal pterygoid implant placement. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data of 100 severely atrophied maxillae requiring implant rehabilitation, obtained between January 2015 and December 2018, were included. The CBCT data were obtained in DICOM format from the radiographic database and imported into Nobel Clinician software (Nobel Biocare) for radiographic analysis. Virtual pterygoid implant placement was successful in 67 maxillae: a 13-mm virtual implant in four maxillae (6.0%), 15-mm in 52 maxillae (77.6%), and 18-mm in 11 maxillae (16.4%). For the virtual pterygoid implant, the mean implant angulation± standard deviation in the anteroposterior axis (sagittal view) was 45.08 ± 2.56° relative to the Frankfort plane. In the buccopalatal axis (coronal view), the mean implant angulation was 64.30 ± 4.99° relative to the Frankfort plane and the mean value for the shortest linear distance between the palatine canal and apical tip of the virtual implant was 3.91 ± 0.62 mm. A 15-mm pterygoid implant placed at 45° in the anteroposterior axis and 60° in the buccopalatal axis (relative to the Frankfort plane), is generally recommended in this Chinese patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q Zhang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - A Abdelrehem
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China; Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - X Z Qu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - C P Zhang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - H S Ong
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Konstantinović VS, Abd-Ul-Salam H, Jelovac D, Ivanjac F, Miličić B. Pterygoid and tuberosity implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: A retrospective cohort study. J Prosthet Dent 2023; 130:219.e1-219.e10. [PMID: 37481400 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Rehabilitation of the partially or completely edentulous posterior maxilla using dental implants is a clinical challenge because of the presence of the maxillary sinus, as well as the low quality and quantity of bone in that region. In addition to bone augmentation procedures, posterior maxillary rehabilitation using implants includes their anchoring in bones such as the zygoma, pterygoid, and maxillary tuberosity, as well as in short implants. However, the performance of pterygoid and tuberosity implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla is unclear. PURPOSE The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the survival of tuberosity and pterygoid implants in patients with posterior maxillary atrophy. MATERIAL AND METHODS A nonprobability convenient sample of patients who had received fixed prostheses on implants placed in the maxillary tuberosity or pterygoid regions was analyzed retrospectively. Demographic variables included sex (male, female) and age. Implant-related variables included surface characteristics, site of placement, implant design, length, diameter, and anteroposterior insertion angle. Prosthetic-related variables included the type of reconstruction for rehabilitation and loading protocols. Implant survival, complications, crestal bone loss, and follow-up intervals were also documented. Collected data were analyzed at both patient and implant levels. The demographics and implant characteristics of patients receiving pterygoid or tuberosity implants were analyzed with a statistical software program (α=.05). Survival analysis was estimated by using the nonparametric Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS A total of 119 patients had 183 pterygoid or tuberosity implants inserted. Most implants in the pterygoid region (71.5%) were Ø4.1 mm (87.4%) and 15 mm in length (60.1%). The most common prostheses were complete maxillary reconstructions (49.2%) with late loading (74.3%). The average implant anteroposterior insertion angle was 60.8 degrees. The cumulative survival rate was 97.3% (n=178) during the mean follow-up period of 57 months (range 1 to 168 months). Among all implants placed, 2.7% failed (n=5) within 2 months of their placement. The statistically significant differences noted between tuberosity and pterygoid implants were related to design, surface characteristics, and loading. The average crestal bone loss was 1.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS The survival of the implants placed in the maxillary tuberosity and pterygoid regions was high in patients with posterior maxillary atrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vitomir S Konstantinović
- Professor, Clinic of Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Hani Abd-Ul-Salam
- Adjunct Professor, Department of Population Oral Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; and Professor, Department of Diagnostic and Oral Surgical Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, College of Dentistry, Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
| | - Drago Jelovac
- Associate Professor, Clinic of Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Filip Ivanjac
- Research Associate, Clinic of Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Biljana Miličić
- Professor, Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stefanelli LV, Mandelaris GA, Franchina A, Di Nardo D, Galli M, Pagliarulo M, Testarelli L, Di Carlo S, Gambarini G. Accuracy Evaluation of 14 Maxillary Full Arch Implant Treatments Performed with Da Vinci Bridge: A Case Series. MATERIALS 2020; 13:ma13122806. [PMID: 32580340 PMCID: PMC7344455 DOI: 10.3390/ma13122806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The use of pterygoid implants can be an attractive alternative to sinus bone grafting in the treatment of posterior atrophic maxilla. This technique has not been widely used because of the difficulty of the surgical access, the presence of vital structures, and the prosthetic challenges. The use of dynamic computer aided implantology (DCAI) allows the clinician to utilize navigation dental implant surgery, which allows the surgeon to follow the osteotomy site and implant positioning in real time. A total of 14 patients (28 pterygoid implants and 56 intersinusal implants) were enrolled in the study for a full arch implant prosthetic rehabilitation (4 frontal implants and 2 pterygoids implants), using a dynamic navigation system. The reported accuracy of pterygoid implants inserted using DCAI was 0.72 mm at coronal point, 1.25 mm at apical 3D, 0.66 mm at apical depth, and 2.86° as angular deviation. The use of pterygoid implants in lieu of bone grafting represents a valid treatment opportunity to carry out a safe, accurate, and minimally invasive surgery, while reducing treatment time and avoiding cantilevers for a full implant prosthetic rehabilitation of the upper arch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi V. Stefanelli
- Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (L.V.S.); (M.G.); (L.T.); (S.D.C.); (G.G.)
| | - George A. Mandelaris
- Private Practice, Periodontics and Dental Implant Surgery; Periodontal Medicine & Surgical Specialists, LTD, Chicago, IL 60601, USA;
| | - Alessio Franchina
- Private Practice, Periodontics and Dental Implant Surgery, 36100 Vicenza, Italy;
| | - Dario Di Nardo
- Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (L.V.S.); (M.G.); (L.T.); (S.D.C.); (G.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-339-3935-527
| | - Massimo Galli
- Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (L.V.S.); (M.G.); (L.T.); (S.D.C.); (G.G.)
| | - Michele Pagliarulo
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgary;
| | - Luca Testarelli
- Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (L.V.S.); (M.G.); (L.T.); (S.D.C.); (G.G.)
| | - Stefano Di Carlo
- Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (L.V.S.); (M.G.); (L.T.); (S.D.C.); (G.G.)
| | - Gianluca Gambarini
- Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (L.V.S.); (M.G.); (L.T.); (S.D.C.); (G.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Uchida Y, Aijima R, Danjo A, Yamashita Y, Shibata K, Kuraoka A. Comparison of posterior alveolar canal location measured on computer tomography scan with cadaveric measurement of posterior superior alveolar foramen in Japanese samples. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 48:1122-1127. [PMID: 30926301 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyse anatomical characteristics of the most posterior alveolar canal (PAC) on computed tomography (CT) images and the posterior superior alveolar foramen (PSAF) physically identified in cadaveric samples, to avoid injuring the posterior superior alveolar artery (PSAA) during surgery in the maxillary tuberosity region. The study included 125 hemi-heads of 64 Japanese cadavers. Simple CT data of the maxillary bone region of the samples were obtained and analysed using measurement software. The alveolar crest (AC) and the PAC were identified to calculate the shortest distance between the AC and the PAC (AC-PAC). Then the samples were dissected to measure physically the shortest distance between the AC and the PSAF (AC-PSAF). The data were analysed statistically. The mean value and standard deviation were 20.7±4.2mm for AC-PAC and 20.7±4.3mm for AC-PSAF. The intraclass correlation coefficient between AC-PAC and AC-PSAF was 0.98. The CT-measured PAC locations were found to be almost identical to the PSAF positions identified physically in the samples. Preoperative CT localization of the PAC aids in avoiding injury to PSAA, while preoperative CT evaluation is important for each case due to significant individual variability in the anatomical PAC and PSAF locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Uchida
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan; Private Practice, Uchida Dental Clinic, Chihaya, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
| | - R Aijima
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan
| | - A Danjo
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan
| | - Y Yamashita
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan
| | - K Shibata
- Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan
| | - A Kuraoka
- Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|