Surgical strategy for long-standing dislocation of the temporomandibular joint: experience with 16 medically compromised patients.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;
57:359-364. [PMID:
30981453 DOI:
10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.12.020]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated the surgical outcomes in 16 patients with long-standing dislocation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ): eight men and eight women, mean (range) age 72 (21-94) years. They all had multiple underlying diseases, either dementia or a mental disorder, and the joint had been dislocated for four weeks or longer. Manual reduction had been ineffective. They were operated on after assessments by the Department of Geriatric Medicine. The procedures were successful in 14 of the 16 patients: eminectomy (n = 5), eminectomy and discectomy or condylectomy (n = 2), eminectomy, discectomy, and condylectomy (n = 3), release of the lateral pterygoid muscle (n = 3), and curettage of a fibrotic scar in the mandibular fossa (n = 1). Reduction was "easy" (n = 4), "moderately difficult" (n = 3), or "very difficult" (n = 9). Complete reduction could not be achieved for two of the "very difficult" patients. After reduction, three patients had the mandibular condyle tethered to the mandibular fossa. Operation was successful in 12 of the 16 patients. Two patients died, one of cardiopulmonary arrest, and one of chronic pulmonary insufficiency, while reduction was incomplete in two. There were no recurrences. The difficulty of reducing the joint in most of our patients suggests that detailed preoperative surgical planning is essential, patients at risk should be carefully selected, and indications for techniques to prevent recurrence should be carefully evaluated.
Collapse