Clinical outcomes in the treatment of unilateral condylar fractures: a cross-sectional study

Can dynamic elastic therapy be established as the standard protocol of closed reduction for moderately displaced extracapsular condylar fractures?

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted with the aim to establish standard technique of closed reduction (CR) and compare functional outcomes in patients of moderately displaced unilateral extracapsular condylar fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective randomized controlled trial, conducted at a tertiary care hospital setting from August, 2013 to November, 2018. Patients of unilateral extracapsular condylar fractures with ramus shortening < 7mm and deviation < 35° were divided in two groups by drawing lots and were treated by dynamic elastic therapy and maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). Mean and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables, and one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson's Chi-square test were used to determine significance of outcomes between two modalities of CR. P value < 0.05 was taken as significant.

RESULTS

The numbers of patients treated by dynamic elastic therapy and MMF were 76 (38 in each group). Out of which 48 (63.15%) were male and 28 (36.84%) were female. The ratio of male to female was 1.7:1. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of age was 32 ± 9.57 years. In patients treated by dynamic elastic therapy, the mean ± SD (at 6-month follow-up) of loss of ramus height (LRH), maximum incisal opening (MIO) and opening deviation were 4.6mm ± 1.08mm, 40.4mm ± 1.57mm and 1.1mm ± 0.87mm respectively. Whereas, LRH, MIO and opening deviation were 4.6mm ± 0.85mm, 40.4mm ± 2.37mm and 0.8mm ± 0.63mm respectively by MMF therapy. One-way ANOVA was statistically insignificant (P value > 0.05) for above mentioned outcomes. Pre-traumatic occlusion was achieved in 89.47% of patients by MMF and in 86.84% patients by dynamic elastic therapy. Pearson's Chi-square test was statistically insignificant (p value < 0.05) for occlusion.

CONCLUSION

Parallel results were obtained for both modalities; thus, the technique as dynamic elastic therapy, which promotes early mobilization and functional rehabilitation, can be favored as standard technique of closed reduction for moderately displaced extracapsular condylar fractures. This technique eases patients' stress associated with MMF and prevents ankylosis.

Anatomical position of the mandibular condyle after open versus closed treatment of unilateral fractures: A three-dimensional analysis

This study aimed to compare open and closed treatment for unilateral mandibular condyle neck and base fractures by final three-dimensional (3D) condylar position at 6 months follow-up. 3D position was associated with mandibular functioning and pain. A total of 21 patients received open (n = 11) or closed (n = 10) treatment. 3D positions were assessed on cone-beam computed tomography scans. Volume differences, root mean square, translations, and rotations were obtained related to the pursued anatomical position and compared between treatment groups by the Mann-Whitney U test. The 3D position parameters were associated with the maximum interincisal opening (MIO), mixing ability test (MAT), Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), and pain based on Spearman correlation coefficients (rs). Translation in the medial-lateral direction was smaller after open treatment (P = 0.014). 3D position was not associated with the MAT; however, worse position was associated with a smaller MIO. A larger pitch rotation was associated with a worse MFIQ (rs = 0.499, P = 0.025). Volume reduction of the affected condyle was associated with more pain (rs = -0.503, P = 0.020). In conclusion, after unilateral condylar fractures, worse 3D position is associated with a smaller mouth opening and worse patient-reported outcomes. This is independent of the chosen treatment, despite a better anatomical reduction after open treatment.

Long-term Complications of Isolated and Combined Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Study Design

Fractures of the mandibular condyle are a common injury in maxillofacial trauma. Both conservative treatment (i.e., analgesic therapy and soft diet) and intermaxillary fixation (IMF) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) have satisfactory and functional outcomes, though severe late-onset complications have been reported.

Objective

We compared the long-term complications of patients with condylar fractures treated conservatively, with IMF, or with combined ORIF and IMF.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral condylar fracture, isolated or combined with a fracture of the mandibular body, admitted to the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery at UZ Leuven between January 2013 and January 2020. We collected data on age, gender, side of condylar fracture, presence of associated fracture of the mandibular body, referrals, initial treatment, long-term complications and secondary treatment. Long-term complications were defined as sequelae still present 6 weeks after initial treatment.

Results

Among 192 patients, 68.8% had unilateral and 31.2% bilateral condylar fractures; an associated fracture of the mandibular body was seen in 45.8%, 31% received conservative treatment, 51% IMF only, and 18% combined ORIF and IMF. Forty-eight percent of all patients suffered from 1 or more long-term complications, most frequently malocclusion (24%), reduced mouth opening (15.1%), nerve disturbances (13.5%), pain (8.9%), and facial asymmetry (2.6%). Surgery as a secondary treatment was necessary in 25% of all cases.

Conclusions

The presence of bilateral condylar fractures or associated fracture of the mandibular body is a risk factor for developing long-term complications. Most patients with long-term complications were initially treated with combined ORIF and IMF, but long-term complications after initial conservative or IMF treatment were treated with secondary surgery.

Evaluation and Prediction of Healing Morphology After Closed Reduction for Unilateral Mandibular Condyle Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Although closed reduction is common for condylar fractures, bone fragments may heal improperly. This study aimed to investigate the healing morphology of unilateral condylar fractures. We retrospectively investigated 70 patients with unilateral condylar fractures. Clinico-statistical analyses were performed on the whole-condylar fracture, closed reduction, and observation/functional therapy groups. Among these patients, 52 patients aged older than 16 years underwent closed reduction. The extent of maximum mouth opening, the incidence of malocclusion, and the relationship between healing morphology and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen classification or trismus were analyzed in the closed reduction group. There were significant differences in age (P=0.008) and sex (P=0.025) between the closed reduction and observation/functional therapy groups. However, there were no significant differences in trauma etiologies and concomitant fractures between the 2 groups. The average maximum mouth opening extent for unilateral fractures after closed reduction was 42.6±6.1 mm. Only 1 case (2.1%) of post-treatment malocclusion was observed. In all the MacLennan classification of deviation or more, regardless of the classification, upper fractures (head and upper neck) tended to heal through a spherical (P<0.001) morphology, whereas lower fractures (lower neck and subcondylar) tended to heal through an L-shaped and lateral fusion (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of trismus between the healing morphology of unchanged type and others (P=0.690). Our results elucidated the etiology, dysfunction, and healing morphology classification of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures treated with closed reduction.

Clinical Application of Digital Joint Guide in the Fracture of the Condyle Neck

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to use a digital guide plate for joint positioning to assist the reduction of condylar neck fractures and evaluate the accuracy of the reduction after surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 20 patients were selected from January 2016 to October 2020, and the reduction of the mandibular condyle neck fracture was designed virtual and digital based on the computed tomography data of the patients, based on the position of the condyle in the articular socket, the height of the ascending mandibular ramus, and the joints. The average value of the anterior space and the posterior space of the joint is these indicators, the position of the condyle is reconstructed, and the fracture reduction finger guide plate is designed. During the operation, the digital guide plate is used to assist the reduction of the condyle neck fracture. The postoperative follow-up was 4 to 12 months to check the accuracy of the reduction.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients, all fractures achieved complete bone healing, the patients' mouth opening was normal, no obvious complications were found, and none of the patients had facial paralysis. In the postoperative evaluation and preoperative virtual design plan, the chromatographic error was within 2 mm, and the magnetic resonance of the temporomandibular joint showed no displacement of the articular disc.

CONCLUSION

The digital joint guide can reduce the fracture of the condyle neck while ensuring the position of the condyle in the joint socket, which is beneficial to reduce the occurrence of subsequent temporomandibular joint complications.

Functional Rehabilitation after Mandibular Fracture - A Systematic Review

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of functional rehabilitation in terms of mouth opening, quality of life, healing process, occlusion and dysfunction, between different treatment methods, after condylar fractures, based on the current literature.

Methods

Using the PRISMA guidelines in search of clinical trials published between 2011 and 2021, a literature analysis was performed. This search was conducted using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms: rehabilitation OR mouth opening recovery OR function recovery AND mandibular fracture OR condylar fracture.

Results

The literature search resulted in a total of 110 study articles, of which seven publications were used in the present review, according to a selection based on the pre-established eligibility criteria. The review showed that open reduction resulted in a better three-dimensional recovery of mandibular movements and revealed greater results regarding the absence of the symptoms after applied treatment. However, studies assessing closed reduction, especially performed with intermaxillary fixation screws (IMFS), revealed excellent results in terms of quality of life, mouth opening and occlusal parameters.

Discussion

This systematic literature review showed that open reduction resulted in a better three-dimensional recovery of mandibular movements and showed greater results regarding the absence of symptoms. However, studies assessing CR, especially those performed with IMFS, revealed excellent results in terms of quality of life, mouth opening and occlusal parameters.

Unilateral Condylar Fracture with Review of Treatment Modalities in 30 Cases - An Evaluative Study

Introduction:

The treatment of subcondylar mandible fractures is a topic of debate and can be variable even though these fractures are commonly seen. The present study aimed at evaluation of various treatment modalities for unilateral condylar fracture in adults.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty patients with unilateral condylar fractures between the age of 18 and 60 years were evaluated. Treatment protocol included closed reduction for 15 patients and open reduction for 15 patients.

Results:

Assessment was done functionally for maximum interincisal mouth opening, deviation on maximum interincisal mouth opening, occlusion and facial nerve function, and radiologically for ramus height shortening. In general, there were no statistically significant differences between closed and open methods.

Discussion:

Both the treatment options for condylar fractures of the mandible yielded acceptable results. Closed treatment appears to be a safe and appropriate modality for most unilateral condylar fractures. Although the open group, in general, showed similar outcomes, this treatment should be reserved for limited indications. The present study has confirmed that both treatment options can yield acceptable results. On clinical examination, there was no significant difference in mouth opening measures, the incidence of occlusal disturbances or in the degree of pain perception.

Identification of malocclusion risk factors after closed treatment of condylar fractures using a novel three-dimensional computed tomography approach

The condyle is the most common site of mandibular fracture. In the present study, an attempt was made to utilize three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images to evaluate mandibular condyle fractures and identify prognostic indicators of malocclusion after closed treatment. Accurate morphometric measurements were performed using 3D-CT images obtained before trauma, after trauma, and after healing. Morphometry revealed significant differences in loss of ramus height (LRH) and lateral movement length in patients with malocclusion, and significant LRH differences in patients with other maxillomandibular fractures after healing, or in those with dislocation-displacement. The present method of 3D-CT image analysis appears useful for evaluation of condylar fractures.

Does Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Provide a Quality-of-Life Benefit Over Traditional Closed Reduction of Mandibular Condyle Fractures?

PURPOSE

This study sought to estimate patient-reported outcomes and compare quality-of-life (QOL) measures between patients electing for either open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or closed reduction with intermaxillary fixation (CRIMF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with unilateral condyle fractures who had undergone either ORIF or CRIMF at the New York University Tisch Hospital and Bellevue Hospital Center. The primary study predictor was treatment choice (ORIF or CRIMF). Other study predictors were patient age, gender, and the presence of any other coexisting facial fractures. The 9 study outcomes were derived from an 11-item postoperative QOL questionnaire evaluating self-reported perceptions of pain and function. Univariate comparisons and multivariate regression models were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients (21 CRIMF and 17 ORIF) comprised the study sample. All patients were eligible for either ORIF or CRIMF, and the choice of treatment was decided through shared decision making after a comprehensive discussion of risks and benefits. With respect to pain outcomes, patients who underwent ORIF reported lower overall pain scores at 2 weeks (P < .01) and 2 months (P = .01), less mastication pain at 3 months (P = .01), and a lower rate of persistent headaches after 6 weeks (P = .04). With respect to functional outcomes, patients who underwent ORIF reported better range of motion at 3 months (P = .01), less treatment-related weight loss (P = .01), and more ease when performing physical (P < .01) and work-related (P < .01) activities. In the multivariate regression models, ORIF was independently associated with decreased pain at 2 weeks (P < .01) and decreased difficulty in obtaining nutrition (P < .01), performing physical activities (P = .02), and performing work-related activities (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent ORIF appeared to experience subjective favorable pain and functional QOL outcomes. Given the clinical controversy, the choice of treatment should synthesize patient-reported outcomes and be approached through shared decision making.

Reproducibility and construct validity of the utrecht mixing ability Test to obtain masticatory performance outcome in patients with condylar mandibular fractures

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the test-retest reproducibility of the Utrecht mixing ability test (MAT) and the construct validity of the MAT in relation to the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ) in patients with mandibular condylar fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients treated for a mandibular condylar fracture participated in this clinimetric study; all patients performed the MAT twice. Simultaneously the MFIQ was conducted. Test-retest reliability and construct validity were assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman correlation, respectively.

RESULTS

The ICC of the MAT was 0.906 (95% CI: 0.801-0.957), which indicates an excellent reliability. A weak correlation of 0.386 (P = .052) between the first MAT and the overall outcome of the MFIQ was found. A significant moderate correlation of 0.401 (P = .042) was found between the retest of the MAT and the overall outcome of the MFIQ. One question on the MFIQ (about yawning) showed a moderate positive correlation of 0.569 (P = .002) and 0.416 (P = .034) for the MAT test and retest, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MAT is an easy test to use in follow-up of patients. The test-retest reliability of this test is excellent in condylar trauma patients. As the validity of the MAT and the MFIQ could not be confirmed, the MFIQ may be an addition to patient's feedback about the rehabilitation process of their mandibular functioning.