Modified high-level Le Fort I advancement without malar augmentation: assessment of effect on midfacial aesthetics

Modified Le Fort I Arc Osteotomy Combined With Autologous Bone Grafts to Improve Midface Hypoplasia Combined With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Technical Note

Midface hypoplasia sometimes appears in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion in the Asian population, often requires additional surgical treatments. The technical note is intended to introduce a modified Le Fort I arc osteotomy combined with autologous bone grafts harvested from proximal segments after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy to improve the profile for skeletal class III malocclusion patients with midface hypoplasia. The benefit of the modified technology is that the size and position of the arc can be adjusted according to the severity of the deformity to suit different patients. In addition, the application of autologous bone grafts increased the extra height of osteotomy line and enhanced the surgical effect, and maintained bone consolidation. More importantly, the osteotomy line of the modified Le Fort I arc osteotomy can be easily designed and this modification will not cause additional injuries. Therefore, we believe that for skeletal class III malocclusion patients with midface hypoplasia in Asia modified Le Fort I arc osteotomy combined with autologous bone grafts will be an efficient surgical method to improve midface hypoplasia.

Effect of Orthognathic Surgery on Movement of the Cheilion

The cheilion (Ch), corner of the mouth, is the soft-tissue landmark where the upper and lower lips intersect. Orthognathic surgery can modify Ch position, which can affect facial esthetics. The aims were to evaluate Ch movements resulting from Le Fort I maxillary advancement with maxillary impaction or downgrafting, and with mandibular advancement or setback, and to investigate relationships between surgical movements and Ch movements. The 45 patients had undergone bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with Le Fort I advancement surgery. They were divided into 4 groups according to surgical movement direction. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were calibrated. Standardized methods were used to identify and measure preoperative and postoperative Ch positions. Significant correlations were detected between extent of maxillary downgrafting and inferior movement of the Ch in group 1 (r=0.988, P=0.001) and group 3 (r=0.915, P=0.001). Also, significant correlations were detected between extent of mandibular advancement and anterior movement of the Ch in group 3 (r=0.561, P=0.046) and group 4 (r=0.661, P=0.005). The findings indicate that, in patients who undergo bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy/Le Fort I surgeries, mandibular advancement moves Ch anteriorly and maxillary downgrafting moves Ch inferiorly.