The seven-step palpation method: A proposal to improve palpation skills

Pelvic Palpatory Tests in Manual Therapy and Osteopathy: A Critical Review of the Literature and Suggestions for New Research

Manual therapists apply physical interventions to the entire structure of the body to promote healing, prevent pathologies, and improve patient health. In osteopathic practice, palpatory evaluation is considered a fundamental clinical practice requirement for identifying somatic dysfunction. Most of the articles published in this area have failed to demonstrate a level of reproducibility that supports palpation in evidence-based clinical practice. When considering the poor reliability of the palpatory tests highlighted in the literature, a discrepancy is noted with what is known about the tactile sensitivity of human hands. For static touch, the minimum size that can be detected, in the absence of applied movement or vibration, is approximately 0.2 mm. Yet, it seems that this high level of precision is insufficient to ensure reliability in the tests used to evaluate osteopathic somatic dysfunction. The purpose that underscores this article is to determine how these two contradictory elements, high sensitivity and low reliability, can be present in palpatory tests. The article reports the literature findings regarding palpatory tests of pelvic, which is an important structure for clinical purposes. Additionally, a critical review of how these studies were conducted is provided to identify any elements that may justify the obtained results. Following recent accredited guidelines present in the literature, we propose suggestions on vision training methods, manual perception refinement training, the search for anatomical markers, and the position of the examiner in relation to the examinee that may be useful for future studies on the topic covered by the article.

[Touch in osteopathy, an opening to dialogue and relationship]

A baby in relational withdrawal can actively participate in a dialogue with a listening hand, such as the osteopath's. This dialogue can become an organizing factor for toddlers at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, for whom general movements are often disrupted. A young child whose motor skills are disorganized will, in spite of himself, generate an increase in non-affectionate touching. The quality of the bodily dialogue that is put in place is likely to contribute to the harmonization of the baby's development and to the opening of a new space of relationship.

Moderate to Substantial Inter-Rater Reliability in the Assessment of Cranial Bone Mobility Restrictions

Background: The World Health Organization benchmarks for osteopathic training consider cranial osteopathy as an important manual skill. Studies of cranial manual therapy have exhibited poor reliability. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-rater reliability of the manual mobility tests of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS), and the temporal, parietal, and frontal bones, as assessed in osteopathic manual therapy. Methods: Twenty-one adults were assessed on a single day by three experienced osteopaths using a standard assessment protocol. Before data collection, the osteopaths participated in a consensus training, which included establishing the criteria for identifying a cranial bone mobility restriction; the application of the seven-step palpation method; a pretesting practice; a fine-tuning palpation training; and a calibration period before the assessment of the subjects. Three subjects were assessed simultaneously with the evaluators rotating to assess each subject. The evaluators were blinded to the subject by a curtain, and each other's assessments. Each bone was rated as restricted or not restricted. The authors applied the Landis and Koch classification to describe the magnitude of inter-rater reliability. Results: Moderate reliability was established for a lateral strain of the SOS (Fleiss' generalized kappa 0.48), substantial reliability was established for the other SOS strain patterns (Fleiss' generalized kappa 0.62-0.75), and almost perfect reliability for temporal, parietal, and frontal bone (Fleiss' generalized kappa 0.81-0.96). Conclusion: The results demonstrate consistency when three experienced osteopaths evaluate cranial bone mobility restrictions. The results highlight the importance of consensus training and rigorous methodology in manual therapy reliability studies.

Learning musculoskeletal anatomy through new technologies: a randomized clinical trial

Objective:

to investigate the influence of the application of new methodologies on learning and the motivation of students of the Anatomy discipline.

Method:

randomized, longitudinal, prospective, intervention study. Sixty-two students were recruited to assess the impact of different methodologies. The sample was randomized to compare the results of teaching with a 3D atlas, ultrasound and the traditional method. The parameters were assessed through a satisfaction evaluation questionnaire and anatomical charts. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance.

Results:

in terms of the usefulness of the seminars, 98.1% of the students considered them to be very positive or positive, stating that they had stimulated their interest in anatomy. The students who learned with the 3D atlas improved their understanding of anatomy (p=0.040). In general, the students improved their grades by around 20%.

Conclusion:

the traditional method combined with new technologies increases the interest of students in human anatomy and enables them to acquire skills and competencies during the learning process.

Lumbar Diagnosis and Pressure Difference Variance

Context

There is no consensus on the correlation between clinical experience and accuracy in diagnosing somatic dysfunctions, which makes it difficult to justify the use of more subjective measures to evaluate this important association. To better understand this relationship, palpatory forces can be observed while diagnosing a somatic dysfunction.

Objective

To quantify the pressure applied in diagnosing lumbar somatic dysfunction, find a correlation between accuracy of diagnosis and palpation pressure, set the standards for palpation, and develop precise palpatory skills for osteopathic medical students.

Methods

The palpatory forces were evaluated between participants with varying experience levels (osteopathic medical students and attending physicians from the New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine). Two osteopathic physicians confirmed an L5 somatic dysfunction diagnosis in a volunteer standardized patient (SP), who served as the control. Participants then palpated the lumbar segment of the SP in a prone position with F-Scan System (TekScan) sensors, which recorded the amount of pressure and time used to reach a full diagnosis.

Results

Participants (11 osteopathic medical students and 10 attending physicians) who diagnosed an L5 somatic dysfunction consistent with the SP's diagnosis had less of a difference in peak force (mean [SD] difference, 62.50 [325.7] g/cm2) between the contact points (right hand vs left hand). In contrast, participants with a dissimilar L5 diagnosis from the SP's had a mean (SD) difference in peak force of 319.38 (703.1) g/cm2. Similarly, the difference in the mean (SD) force of palpation between the contact points was lower in participants who made the correct diagnosis (16.81 [117.4] g/cm2) vs those who made an incorrect diagnosis (123.92 [210.3] g/cm2). No statistical significance was found between the diagnostic accuracy of the students and physicians (P=.387) or the time taken to reach a diagnosis (P=.199).

Conclusion

We observed that using equal pressures in both hands while palpating a lumbar segment correlates to more accurate somatic dysfunction diagnoses.

Real-time Visualisation and Analysis of Clinicians' Performance during Palpation in Physical Examinations

OBJECTIVE

Motivated by the fact that palpation skills are challenging to learn and teach, particularly during Digital Rectal Examinations (DRE), and the lack of understanding of what constitutes adequate performance, we present a visualisation and analysis system that uses small position and pressure sensors located on the examining finger, allowing the quantitative analysis of duration, steps and pressure applied.

METHODS

The system is first described, followed by an experimental study of twenty experts from four clinical specialties performing ten DREs each on a benchtop model using the proposed system. Analysis of the constitutive steps was conducted to improve understanding of the examination. A Markov model representing executed tasks and analysis of pressure applied is also introduced.

RESULTS

The proposed system successfully allowed the visualisation and analysis during the experimental study. General Practitioners and Nurses were found to execute more tasks compared to Urologists and Colorectal Surgeons. Urologists executed the least number of tasks and were the most consistent group compared to others.

CONCLUSION

The ability to "see through" allowed us to better characterise the performance of experts when conducting a DRE on a benchtop model, comparing the performance of relevant specialties, and studying executed tasks and the pressure applied. The Markov model presented summarises task execution of experts and could be used to compare performance of novices against that of experts.

SIGNIFICANCE

This approach allows for the analysis of performance based on continuous sensor data recording that can be easily extended to real subjects and other types of physical examinations.