The lipid laden macrophage index as a marker of aspiration in patients with type I and II laryngeal clefts

Lipid‐Laden Macrophage Index as a Diagnostic Tool for Pediatric Aspiration: A Systematic Review

Objective

Lipid-laden macrophage index (LLMI) has been proposed as a marker for aspiration on bronchoalveolar lavage. It has also been studied as a marker for gastroesophageal reflux and other pulmonary diseases. This review aims to determine the clinical correlation between LLMI and pediatric aspiration.

Data Sources

PubMed (MeSH search), Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) portals through December 17th, 2020.

Review Methods

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis criteria were followed, and a quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Search criteria included all occurrences in the title or abstract of the terms "pulmonary aspiration" and "alveolar macrophages."

Results

Five studies describing 720 patients met inclusion, 3 retrospective case-control studies, and 2 prospective observational studies. Four studies suggested a link between elevated LLMI and aspiration, and 1 found no association. Control groups varied and included healthy nonaspirators to nonaspirators with other pulmonary diseases. Diagnosis of aspiration was not standardized across the studies. Three papers proposed cutoff values for LLMI, all different.

Conclusion

The existing literature indicates that LLMI is not a sensitive or specific marker for aspiration. Further study is needed to define the utility of LLMI in pediatric aspiration.

Pediatric dysphagia: Is interarytenoid mucosal height significant?

OBJECTIVES

The clinical significance of the interarytenoid mucosal height (IAMH) in pediatric dysphagia, ranging from normal anatomy to a laryngeal cleft, is unknown. This study seeks to evaluate a cohort of patients who underwent evaluation of their IAMH during microdirect laryngoscopy (MDL) for associations between IAMH and dysphagia as diagnosed on preoperative videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS).

METHODS

A retrospective case series of 1,351 patients who underwent MDL between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed for intraoperative evaluation of IAMH using our interarytenoid assessment protocol. After exclusions, 182 patients were divided into three groups: 1) thickened diet: VFSS with recommendation for thickened liquids (n = 82 of 182; 45.1%), 2) normal diet: VFSS with allowance of thin liquids (n = 19 of 182; 10.4%), and 3) control: no VFSS performed (n = 81 of 182; 44.5%).

RESULTS

There was no difference in IAMH between groups (P = 0.35). Power analysis was able to achieve > 80% power to detect an effect size of ≥ 0.5 (1-5 mucosal height scale). The majority of patients in each group had an IAMH above the false vocal folds (thickened diet: 57.3%, normal diet: 57.9%, control: 64.2%). There were similar percentages of patients in each group with an IAMH at or below the true vocal folds (thickened diet: 4.9%, normal diet: 5.3%, control: 6.1%).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant association between IAMH and preoperative thickened liquid recommendation in this cohort. This data fails to support the hypothesis that the IAMH is an independent etiological factor for pediatric pharyngeal dysphagia. Further studies comparing IAMH with outcomes after feeding therapy and surgery may better clarify this relationship between anatomy and physiology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 129:2588-2593, 2019.

Diagnosis and Management of Laryngotracheoesophageal Cleft

Laryngotracheoesophageal cleft (LTEC) is a rare anatomic cause of aspiration in the newborn and infant. The clinical presentation of infants with LTEC is variable and will usually vary with the degree of anatomic communication between the airway and esophagus. The diagnosis of LTEC is often challenging, particularly in cases where the presentation and pathology are more subtle. Management of LTEC depends upon the clinical presentation, degree of aspiration, and anatomic depth of the cleft. The goal of this review is to present the clinician with a practical approach to diagnosis and management of this rare but challenging congenital airway anomaly.

Laryngotracheoesophageal clefts

Laryngotracheoesophageal clefts are rare congenital anomalies of the aerodigestive tract. Patients may present with airway and/or swallowing impairments. An approach to evaluation and management is presented. Important pearls for conservative and surgical management are discussed. Open versus endoscopic surgical techniques are reviewed.

Swallowing dysfunction among patients with laryngeal cleft: More than just aspiration?

BACKGROUND

The Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) is the most widely utilized instrumental assessment of swallowing disorders in children; however, the exact role in the evaluation of laryngeal clefts remains controversial.

METHODS

This study was an IRB-approved retrospective review on patients diagnosed with laryngeal cleft from 2002 to 2014. The objective was to describe the range of swallowing dysfunction that may be present in patients with laryngeal clefts both pre- and post-intervention (conservative management versus surgery). A speech-language pathologist reviewed MBS studies and medical records to determine Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-five patients who underwent laryngeal cleft repair during the study period (type 1, n=111; type 2, n=54; type 3, n=9; type 4, n=1) were included. Fifty patients who were managed conservatively (type 1) were also included. Swallowing impairment was demonstrated in all phases of swallowing for all cleft types. Oral phase impairment ranged from 27-67% pre-intervention to 19-75% post-intervention, triggering impairment from 24-42% pre-intervention to 24-75% post-intervention, and pharyngeal phase impairment (laryngeal penetration and aspiration) from 57-100% pre-intervention to 40-100% post-intervention. Laryngeal penetration and aspiration on thin and thick liquids, silent aspiration, PAS, and FOIS scores are reported. Significant improvements in swallowing function (p<0.05) were documented in all of the conservatively and surgically managed sub-groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The MBS study is a useful tool for evaluating swallowing function in patients with laryngeal cleft and provides information beyond the lack or presence of aspiration. Understanding impairments in all phases of swallowing may be beneficial for perioperative management.

The utility of bronchoalveolar lavage findings in the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis in children

INTRODUCTION

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)-nucleated cell counts and the lipid-laden alveolar macrophage index (LLMI) have been investigated in predicting chronic aspiration as well as reflux esophagitis with variable results. To date, BAL neutrophil percentages and the LLMI have not been described in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate BAL neutrophil percentages and LLMI levels in patients with EoE and compare these levels in patients with aerodigestive concerns without biopsy-proven EoE.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients referred to an aerodigestive evaluation team for overlapping aerodigestive complaints (dysphagia, stridor, subglottic stenosis, feeding intolerance, and chronic aspiration). Patients underwent microlaryngoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy, and bronchoscopy and BAL were indicated by symptoms. BAL neutrophil percentages, LLMI levels, esophageal biopsy results, and esophageal dual-probe pH/impedance were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included in the study that underwent comprehensive workup for aerodigestive complaints. Patients were subdivided into two groups: (1) negative esophageal biopsy (for EoE) and (2) positive esophageal biopsy. There were no significant differences between the groups in percentage neutrophils (p=0.55, unpaired t-test) or LLMI levels (p=0.14, unpaired t-test).

DISCUSSION

BAL neutrophil percentages and the LLMI are unreliable in identifying patients with silent aspiration and gastroesophageal reflux. To date, there is no report of the utility of BAL neutrophil percentages and the LLMI in diagnosing patients with EoE. Our series indicates no correlation in neutrophil percentages or LLMI in patients with EoE versus patients without EoE that are referred to tertiary centers with aerodigestive concerns.

CONCLUSION

BAL neutrophil percentages and LLMI levels are not a reliable predictor of eosinophilic esophagitis in children with complex aerodigestive concerns. Esophageal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of EoE and the challenge remains to find other markers that raise suspicion for EoE for the non-gastroenterologist or that stage the extent of disease beyond the esophagus.

The management of laryngeal clefts

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical presentation and management of all infants and children presenting with laryngeal clefts to a tertiary pediatric ENT centre and to identify changes in practice over time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective case note review of the management of all infants and children with a diagnosis of a laryngeal cleft identified in our Department between 01/11/2003 and 31/12/2010.

RESULTS

Twelve children with laryngeal clefts were identified. Six clefts were grade 1, five grade 2 and one grade 3b. All grade 1 clefts were managed conservatively. Of the grade 2 clefts, four required surgery with one being managed conservatively. Two were repaired using an open technique and two using an endoscopic technique. The grade 3b cleft was repaired endoscopically. Two cleft repairs broke down post-operatively requiring further surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative management remains the management of choice for lower grade clefts. Where a laryngeal cleft requires repair there has been a trend towards the endoscopic over open technique, even of more extensive clefts.