Persistent oro-nasal fistula after primary cleft palate repair: minimizing the rate via a standardized protocol

Outcome of Nasal Layer Reinforcement With Autologous Dermis in Cleft Palate Repair on Postoperative Fistula Formation

Palatal fistulae are challenging complications following cleft palate repair. The addition of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) to cleft palate repair has been shown to reduce fistula formation in previous studies. The use of autologous dermal graft has all the structural advantages of ADM, has less rejection and immunogenic potential, and is cost effective.

A prospective study.

Patients with Group II and III cleft palate (Nagpur Classification) without prior intervention for palatal repair in the Department of Plastic Surgery at PGIMER from January 2020 till June 2021.

The addition of autologous dermal graft for palatoplasty.

Outcome of the study was fistula development or exposure of dermal graft.

Autologous dermal graft was harvested of average dimension of 8.73 cm2 (range 5.25-18 cm2) from groin region. Sixteen patients were included in the study. Among them, 2 patients (12.5%) developed postoperative fistula (Type III &V Pittsburgh Classification).

Our study showed that the rates of postoperative fistula formation are comparable with prior literature using artificial dermal matrices.

Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Palatal Fistulae after Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery in a North-Western Romanian Population over a 10-Year Period

Cleft lip and palate is the most frequent birth anomaly, with increasing reported rates of complications, such as palate fistulae. Current studies concerning the occurrence rate of cleft lip and palate (CLP) report 2 to 10 cases in 10,000 births. The purpose of this study was to investigate the existence of factors that could predict the occurrence of fistulae after cleft lip and palate surgery. A retrospective study was performed by collecting and analyzing data from all patients who were operated for cleft lip and/or palate in the Maxillo-Facial Department of the Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Cluj-Napoca, Romania, between 2010 and 2020. We investigated the existing evidence for possible links between the number of fistulae observed after the primary palatoplasty and the age at which the primary palatoplasty was performed, the sex of the patient, the type of cleft, the timing of the surgical corrections, and the presence of comorbidities. A total of 137 cases were included for analysis. A significant link between the number of fistulae and the type of cleft was found (with fistulae occurring more frequently after the surgical correction of CLP—p < 0.001). No evidence was found for the existence of significant links between the number of fistulae and the patient’s sex, the timing of surgery, or the presence of comorbidities. This study concluded that the incidence of palatal fistulae appears to be influenced by the type of cleft (CLP), but not by the sex of the patient, the timing of surgery, or the presence of comorbidities.

Revision Surgery of the Cleft Palate

Cleft palate repairs often require secondary surgeries and/or revisions for a variety of reasons. The most common causes are symptomatic oronasal fistulas and velopharyngeal insufficiency. Complications from primary surgery, such as wound dehiscence, infection, and hematomas, contribute to the relatively high rate of revision surgery. Prevention of postoperative complications that may lead to fistula or velopharyngeal insufficiency is key, and many techniques have been described that have reportedly decreased the incidence of secondary surgery. Management varies depending on the nature of the fistulous defect and the type of velopharyngeal insufficiency. Numerous surgical options exist to fix this deficiency.

The incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency and oronasal fistula after primary palatal surgery with Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty: A retrospective study in Isfahan Cleft Care Team

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine the incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), oronasal fistula development and facial grimace in patients seen by Isfahan Cleft Care Team (ICCT) after primary Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty (SIVV). Furthermore the association of gender, cleft type and age at primary surgery with the incidence of hypernasality and fistula is determined.

METHODS

A group of 40 patients with history of cleft palate with or without cleft lip were identified from the records of ICCT between 2011 and 2014. The main outcome measures were the incidence of hypernasality and fistula after primary palate repair with SIVV. Speech recordings were analyzed by consensus by two speech therapists according to the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech- Augmented (CAPS-A), (Kappa = 82.4). Deciding whether or not to have a fistula was based on the oral examination videos.

RESULTS

Severe and moderate hypernasality was observed in 42.5% of patients. Normal resonance and mild/borderline hypernasality was observed in 37.5% and 20% of patients, respectively. The frequency of fistulas was 7.5%. There was a significant association between hypernasality with cleft type and the age at primary surgery (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Significant progress has been made in the outcomes of the primary palate surgeries with the SIVV technique compared to the previous study in the ICCT.

Cleft Palate Repair: Description of an Approach, Its Evolution, and Analysis of Postoperative Fistulas

BACKGROUND

Fistulas following cleft palate repair impair speech, health, and hygiene and occur in up to 35 percent of cases. The authors detail the evolution of a surgical approach to palatoplasty; assess the rates, causes, and predictive factors of fistulas; and examine the temporal association of modifications to fistula rates.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 146) undergoing palatoplasty during the first 6 years of practice were included. The technique of repair was based on cleft type, and a common surgical approach was used for all repairs.

RESULTS

The fistula rate was 2.4 percent (n = 125) after primary repair and 0 percent (n = 21) after secondary repair. All complications occurred in patients with type III or IV clefts. Cleft width and cleft-to-total palatal width ratio were associated with fistulas, whereas syndromes, age, and adoption were not. Most complications could also be attributed to technical factors. During the first 2 years, modifications were made around specific anatomical features, including periarticular bony hillocks, maxillopalatine suture, velopalatine pits, and tensor insertion. The fistula rate declined by one-half in subsequent years.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors describe a surgical approach to cleft palate repair, its evolution, and surgically relevant anatomy. Fistulas were associated with increasing cleft severity but could also be attributed to technical factors. A reduction in frequency and severity of fistulas was consistent with a learning curve and may in part be associated with modifications to the surgical approach.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Palatal Protective Stents Prevent Oro-Nasal Fistulas after Surgery for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Preliminary Report

Background: One of the potential complications of surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is postoperative oral-nasal fistula (ONF). Reported rates vary from 0 to 60%. Several factors are on account of these disproportionate rates. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the use of a palatal protective stent (PPS) to preserve the VPI repair surgical site and to study its effectiveness for decreasing the incidence of postoperative ONF. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out. All patients undergoing surgery for VPI with complete preoperative and postoperative evaluations including at least one year follow up after surgery from 2012 to 2016 were studied. Some of the patients were operated on using a pre-molded palatal protective stent (PPS). Twenty-seven patients were included in the study group. Most of the patients underwent a customized pharyngeal flap according to findings of imaging procedures. The remaining cases underwent a Furlow palatoplasty. Twelve patients were operated on using PPS. Results: There were no surgical complications during the procedures. ONF was detected in four of the patients operated on without PPS. None of the patients undergoing surgery using PPS demonstrated ONF. All fistulas were located at the soft/hard palate junction. VPI was corrected in 92% of the cases. Conclusion: Although only a reduced number of cases were studied, these preliminary results suggest that using PPS during surgical procedures for correcting VPI is a safe and reliable tool for preventing ONF.

Repair of Primary Cleft Palate and Oronasal Fistula With Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Systematic Review and Surgeon Survey

OBJECTIVE

The current review and survey aim to assess the effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in the repair of cleft palate and oronasal fistula and to evaluate the current trends of ADM use in palate surgery.

DESIGN

A systematic review of English articles was conducted using MEDLINE (1960 to July 1, 2016), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960 to July 1, 2016), and EMBASE (1991 to July 1, 2016). Additional studies were identified through a review of references cited in initially identified articles. Search terms included "cleft palate," "palatal," "oronasal fistula," "acellular dermal matrix," and "Alloderm®." An online survey was disseminated to members of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association to assess current trends in ADM use in palate surgery.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies evaluating the outcome of primary palate repair or repair of oronasal fistula with the use of aceullar dermal matrix products were included in the review.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met inclusion criteria for review. Studies were generally of low quality, as indicated by methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) scores ranging from 7 to 14. The pooled estimate for fistula formation after primary palatoplasty following ADM use was 7.1%. The pooled estimate for recurrence of fistula after attempted repair using ADM was 11%. Thirty-six cleft surgeons responded to the online survey study. Of these, 45% used ADM in primary cleft palate repair, while 67% used ADM for repair of oronasal fistulae.

CONCLUSION

Use of ADM products is commonplace in palate surgery. Despite this, there is a paucity of high-quality data demonstrating benefit. Further randomized controlled trials examining ADM in palate surgery are required to help develop structured guidelines and improve care.

Single-Stage Repair of Palatal Fistula and Velopharyngeal Incompetence by the New L Flap

OBJECTIVE

To describe and assess the results of use of the new L-shaped posterior pharyngeal flap for repair of both palatal fistula and velopharyngeal incompetence.

METHODS

This study included 10 patients who were diagnosed to have soft palate fistula and persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). L-shaped superiorly based pharyngeal flap was harvested from oropharynx and inserted into the soft palate closing the fistula after fistula trimming. The palatal part of the flap (transverse limb) was spread 1 cm horizontally and 1 cm in the anteroposterior direction in soft palate at fistula site closing it without tension. Prior to and after surgery, patients were assessed by examination, video-nasoendoscopy, and speech assessment.

RESULTS

Closure of the palatal fistula could be achieved in all patients. Postoperative speech assessment showed significant improvement in the nasal emission, resonance, intraoral pressure, and articulation defects. Grade 4 velopharyngeal valve closure (complete closure) could be achieved in all patients. No patients showed dehiscence (partial or total) of the flap and no obstructive sleep apnea reported.

CONCLUSION

The new used L-shaped pharyngeal flap could properly close palatal fistula and correct velopharyngeal functions (closure and speech) in patients with persistent VPI with no reported significant complication and without the need for palatal dissection or flaps.

Fistula in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients-A Systematic Scoping Review

AIMS

(1) Assess the level of available evidence regarding fistula occurrence in cleft lip and palate patients, (2) identify main research areas in the original studies, (3) evaluate the quality of original studies, and (4) summarize the evidence.

METHODS

Two independent researchers searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, Web of Knowledge, Web of Science and EMBASE, the Grey literature, and the reference lists of main references. The level of evidence was assessed based on study design and according to the Hierarchy of Evidence. The quality assessment was done using the adapted Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklists and a validity scoring system. Main findings were summarized, and fistula rates were compared between early and more recent articles, also between high-quality and low-quality studies.

RESULTS

The systematic search and relevance assessment identified a total of 127 sources of evidence. The overall level of evidence was weak because it was dominated by small studies (<30 subjects), retrospective cohort studies, and case series. Main research areas were either: (1) focused on surgeries or (2) focused on risk determinants associated with fistula occurrence. Recent reports were of higher quality than the older ones, but the overall quality in the majority of reports was low. Knowledge synthesis demonstrated a wide range of rates for primary fistula (0-78%). No significant difference was found in the fistula rates of older studies compared with more recent studies or among different quality studies. Multiple risk determinants were studied and age at surgery, surgeon's experience, type and severity of cleft were the most frequently examined risk determinants. However, findings concerning different risk determinants and fistula occurrence were not consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

The research mainly focused on surgeries and fistula-related risk determinants. The available evidence was low level and of poor quality. No consistent pattern between fistula occurrence and any of the risk determinants could be detected. Reported fistula rates did not differ significantly when comparing older studies with more recent studies or when high-quality studies were compared with low-quality studies.

Isolated cleft palate requires different surgical protocols depending on cleft type

A staged protocol for isolated cleft palate (CPO), comprising the early repair of the soft palate at 6 months and delayed repair of the eventual cleft in the hard palate until 4 years, designed to improve maxillary growth, was introduced. CPO is frequently associated with additional congenital conditions. The study evaluates this surgical protocol for clefts in the soft palate (CPS) and for clefts in the hard and soft palate (CPH), with or without additional malformation, regarding primary and secondary surgical interventions needed for cleft closure and for correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency until 10 years of age. Of 94 consecutive children with CPO, divided into four groups with (+) or without (-) additional malformations (CPS + or CPS - and CPH + or CPH-), hard palate repair was required in 53%, performed with small local flaps in 21% and with bilateral mucoperiosteal flaps in 32%. The total incidence of soft palate re-repair was 2% and the fistula repair of the hard palate was 5%. The total incidence of secondary velopharyngeal surgery was 17% until 10 years, varying from 0% for CPS - and 15% for CPH-, to 28% for CPS + and 30% for CPH+. The described staged protocol for repair of CPO is found to be safe in terms of perioperative surgical results, with comparatively low need for secondary interventions. Furthermore, the study indicates that the presence of a cleft in the hard palate and/or additional conditions have a negative impact on the development of the velopharyngeal function.

Surgical learning curve in performing palatoplasty: A retrospective study in 200 patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the influence of the experience of the surgeon on the occurrence of fistulas following palatoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of consecutive children treated between 2006 and 2013 for cleft palate by a single surgeon. Cleft palate repair was performed using the von Langenbeck technique, Furlow palatoplasty, buccal flap or Vomer flap. Data was collected for age, sex, date of birth, syndrome, adoption, cleft palate type, type of repair, cleft width, fistula occurrence and location of fistula.

RESULTS

A total of 276 operations were performed in 200 children (Veau I, II, III, IV). Mean age at surgery was 21.9 months (range: 6.2 months to 26 years 8.3 months). Postoperatively, palatal fistulas occurred in eight patients (4.0%), however, the incidence was 3.0% in the non-adoption group and 9.7% in the adoption population. In this study there was no statistically significant evidence of a surgical learning curve, and no significant associations between fistula rate and sex, adoption, syndrome, cleft type, cleft width, or type of repair.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates a fistula formation rate of 3.0% for the non-adoption population and 9.7% for the adoption population. There was no statistically significant evidence of a learning curve during the first few years of performing cleft palate repair. No other independent risk factors for postoperative fistula formation were identified; however, the benefit of a vomer flap and subsequent reduction in fistula incidence was demonstrated.