Hearing thresholds and ventilation tube treatment in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Managing Chronic otitis media with Effusion in Children with non-Syndromic Cleft Palate: Short-Term Ventilation Tubes Versus Surveillance

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of short-term ventilation tubes compared to surveillance on conductive hearing loss in children with non-syndromic orofacial clefting involving the muscular palate.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic otitis media with effusion is a common finding in children with cleft palate. The accepted convention is insertion of short-term ventilation tubes at the time of palate repair, but some centres are choosing conservative management. Each approach has its advantages but there is currently no consensus on the most appropriate management in children with non-syndromic cleft palate.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Children <18 years with cleft lip and palate, or isolated cleft palate, not associated with a genetic syndrome, who have been diagnosed with chronic otitis media with effusion.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Scopus databases was conducted. Grey literature searches were conducted through Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov and ProQuest. Two reviewers screened the studies, conducted critical appraisal, assessed the methodological quality, and extracted the data. Where possible, studies were pooled in statistical meta-analysis with heterogeneity being assessed using the standard Chi-squared and I2 tests.

RESULTS

Four studies met the inclusion criteria but were of low quality with a moderate risk of bias. Only data on hearing thresholds could be pooled for analysis which found no statistically significant difference. Other outcomes were presented in narrative form. Certainty of evidence for all outcomes was deemed low to very low using GRADE criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

No definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding most effective management at improving conductive hearing loss. Missing data and inconsistent reporting of outcomes limited capacity for pooled analysis.

Prevalence of Chronic Middle Ear Effusion in Cases of Cleft Palate

Chronic middle ear effusion is generally present in children with cleft palate (CP) associated with or without cleft lips. The aim of our study was to assessment of how common middle ear effusion is in patients with cleft palates and to evaluate the presence of these symptoms by performing a Basic Audiological Evaluation (BAE). A retrospective randomized study was conducted on 50 children (29 male and 21 female) aged 2 to 16 years who had CPs (associated with or without cleft lips) with symptoms of middle ear effusion. The study was conducted from March 2021 to February 2022. Data review included the results of otoscopic findings and BAE. The Fundamentals of BAE comprise the testing of middle ear function with tympanometry and a pure tone audiometry to determine the kind and degree of hearing impairment. Regarding the BAE, we found that 70% of the children with normal hearing, 24% with conductive type of hearing loss, and 6% with mixed type of hearing loss. The tympanometric results revealed that 66% of the children with type A tympanogram, 24% with type C tympanogram, and 10% with type B tympanogram. The contralateral stapedial reflex was present in 60% of the patients while in 40% of cases not present. The results confirmed the great prevalence of chronic middle ear effusion in children with CPs. Furthermore, the hearing impairment associated with middle ear effusion was visible, demonstrating that middle ear effusion was linked with the prevalence of moderate conductive type of hearing loss. The OME in cases of CP necessitates early prediction and in turn early treatment.

Relevance of cleft palatal width in short-term otologic outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Children with cleft palate are at increased risk for Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and conductive hearing loss from chronic otitis media. While it has been proposed that the severity of ETD is related to the severity of cleft palate, data are lacking to support this hypothesis. An improved understanding of the relevance of cleft width may have prognostic value that could inform decisions on the timing of tympanostomy tube placement and choice of tympanostomy tube design. The objective of this study was to assess severity of ETD in children with narrow, moderate, and wide cleft palate, with examination of hearing outcomes, number of tympanostomy procedures, and incidence of otologic complications.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was conducted on 58 patients with primary palatoplasty performed at a single academic medical center from January 1, 2016-December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was the number of otologic procedures performed after the initial palatoplasty. Secondary outcomes included audiometric findings, number of tympanostomy tube placements, presence of effusion at the time of myringotomy, and occurrence of any postoperative otologic complication. Outcomes were compared for patients with narrow (<10 mm), moderate (10-15 mm), and wide (>15 mm) cleft palate. Analysis included consideration of cleft palatal morphology (Veau I - IV), presence of Robin sequence or syndromes, and risk factors for otitis media.

RESULTS

Patients with moderate and wide cleft palate underwent higher mean numbers of otologic procedures [narrow: 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9, 1.7); moderate: 1.6 (95% CI 1.1, 2.1); wide: 1.8 (95% CI 1.2, 2.4)]. Moderate and wide cleft palate were less likely to have normal hearing after their first tympanostomy (narrow: 50%, 10/20; moderate: 25%, 6/24; wide: 36%, 5/14). Patients with a wide cleft palate had a shorter median time between first and second tympanostomy procedures (median, IQR; narrow: 27.0, 20.8-35.7; moderate 20.4, 16.3-25.9; wide 17.3, 11.5-23.4).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that patients with wider cleft palate may be more susceptible to severe ETD. Further large-scale study may help to allow for more informed and personalized clinical decision making for management of cleft palate, incorporating cleft width for prognosis of risks for persistent middle ear dysfunction.

Outcomes of Tympanoplasty After Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze graft success rates and hearing outcomes in patients with a history of cleft palate (CP) repair undergoing tympanoplasty.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

Per PRISMA guidelines, the databases were searched from date of inception through December 14, 2021. Studies of patients with previous CP repair who underwent tympanoplasty were included. Meta-analysis of proportions, continuous measures, odds ratios (ORs), and meta-regression were used to analyze graft success and hearing outcomes after tympanoplasty.

RESULTS

A total of 323 patients with CP repair and 1169 controls were included. The proportion of graft success was 86.7% (95% CI, 76.1%-94.5%) in patients with CP repair and 88.8% (95% CI, 76.9-96.8) in controls. There was no difference in odds of graft success between patients with CP repair and controls (OR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.5-1.8]; P = .870). Age was not a significant moderator of graft success in patients with CP repair (r = 0.1 [95% CI, -0.2 to 0.3]; P = .689) or controls (r = -0.0 [95% CI, -0.1 to 0.1]; P = .952). Comparing mean differences between pre- and postoperative air-bone gap was not statistically significant in patients with CP repair and controls (0.2 dB [95% CI, -3.1 to 3.4]; P = .930). Odds of functional success (postoperative air-bone gap <20 dB) were not different between the groups (OR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.5-1.4]; P = .450).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis does not endorse anatomic or functional differences between patients with CP repair and controls after tympanoplasty. However, there is a paucity of evidence for younger children. Further studies are warranted to elucidate specific risk factors for tympanoplasty outcomes in young patients with previous CP repair.

Tympanostomy Tubes: Are They Necessary? A Systematic Review on Implementation in Cleft Care

OBJECTIVE

To understand the indication for and the effects of early ventilation tube insertion (VTI) on hearing and speech for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP).

DESIGN

We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-guided systematic review of relevant literature.

SETTING

Setting varied by geographical location and level of clinical care across studies.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

Patients with CLP who underwent VTI were included.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary outcome measures were hearing and speech following VTI. Secondary outcome measures were tube-related and middle ear complications. Early VTI occurred before or at time of palatoplasty while late VTI occurred after palatoplasty.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles met inclusion criteria. Articles varied among study design, outcome measures, sample size, follow-up, and quality. Few studies demonstrated support for early VTI. Many studies reported no difference in hearing or speech between early and late VTI. Others reported worse outcomes, greater likelihood of complications, or needing repeat VTI following early tympanostomy placement. Several studies had significant limitations, including confounding variables, small sample size, or not reporting on our primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

No consistency was found regarding which patients would benefit most from early VTI. Given the aforementioned variability and sub-optimal methodologies, additional studies are warranted to provide stronger evidence regarding VTI timing in cleft care.

Hearing Status and Ventilation Tube at Time of Palatoplasty in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: There is no consensus regarding the indications for and timing of ventilation tube (VT) insertion in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients. Our aim was to search for clinical and surgical (i.e., VT insertion) characteristics that influence the hearing status in CLP. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the hearing outcome of consecutive CLP cases operated on at a single referral center. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied as appropriate. Results: We included 285 consecutive CLP patients, 109 female and 176 male; the mean age at last follow-up was 16.2 years. Unilateral CLP was found in 249 cases and bilateral CLP in 36. Early VTs (i.e., at the time of hard palate surgery) were applied in 75 (26.3%) patients. Late VTs (i.e., after hard palate surgery during follow-up) were applied in 69 (24.2%) children, at a mean age of 6.7 years old. Hearing loss (pure-tone average > 20 dB) was found in 114 (40%) CLP patients at last available follow-up (mild hearing loss in 96 patients, moderate in 18). In univariate and multivariate analyses, we found that only the absence of early VT insertion (p = 0.0003; OR = 18.2) was an independent prognostic factor of hearing loss in CLP patients. Furthermore, when early VTs were not inserted, there was a high risk of late VT (p = 0.002; OR 13.6). Conclusions: According to our results, the absence of VT insertion at the time of hard palate surgery is an independent prognostic risk factor of hearing loss in CLP patients. Early VT placement in CLP patients may prevent hearing loss and related consequences. These findings should be tested in a large, randomized clinical trial.

Impact of a Modified Restoration of Tensor Veli Palatini on Hearing and Middle Ear Function in Cleft Palate Children-a Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Many children with cleft palate also exhibit hearing loss and middle ear dysfunction, which could last for years. There are still arguments on how to treat this problem. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a modified restoration of tensor veli palatine (TVP) on hearing and middle ear function in the cleft palate children.

METHODS

This retrospective study was completed using records of the cleft palate children who received surgery in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from May 2013 to December 2020. They were divided into 2 groups: Group 1: children who received cleft palate surgery without specific restoration of TVP; Group 2: children who received palate surgery with a specific TVP restoration technique. Perioperative information was collected. The conductive auditory brainstem response and the 226-Hz tympanometry before and after the cleft surgery were compared intragroup and intergroup.

RESULTS

Totally 42 children were included in this study, 21 children in each group. There were no significant differences considering clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. The modified TVP restoration didn't increase operation time or complication compared with no TVP restoration. Statistically, neither the auditory brainstem response air conduction hearing thresholds nor the 226-Hz tympanometry results had significant differences between the 2 groups after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified restoration of TVP was not time-consuming and did not increase complications. The beneficial effect of the modified TVP restoration on the hearing or the middle ear function of cleft palate children was uncertain around 6 months after surgery compared with no restoration.

Effectiveness of ventilation tube insertion for conductive hearing loss in children with chronic otitis media with effusion and non-syndromic cleft palate: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

This review will investigate the efficacy of ventilation tube insertion versus non-surgical options in the management of chronic otitis media with effusion in children with non-syndromic cleft palate by assessing the degree of conductive hearing loss.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic otitis media with effusion is common in children with cleft palate due to associated eustachian tube dysfunction. It can lead to impaired hearing and can hinder speech and language development. The main treatment options are drainage of effusion with ventilation tubes, surveillance, or amplification with hearing aids. Each of these approaches has its advantages but there is currently no consensus on the most appropriate management in children with cleft palate.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Eligible studies will include children (<18 years) with cleft palate not associated with a genetic syndrome, diagnosed with chronic otitis media with effusion, who have undergone insertion of ventilation tubes compared with either surveillance or amplification with hearing aids.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus will be conducted to find published literature. Gray literature searches will be conducted through the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Two reviewers will screen studies, conduct critical appraisal of eligible studies, assess the methodological quality, and extract the data. Where possible, studies will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis, with heterogeneity of data being assessed using the standard χ 2 and I2 tests.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42021255861.

Efficacy of Ventilation Tube Insertion with Palatal Repair for Otitis Media in Cleft Palate: Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Cleft palate is the most common congenital facial deformity and may result in multiple sequelae and disabilities. One common comorbidity is refractory otitis media with effusion (OME), as patients with cleft palate have impaired eustachian tube function with alteration of the nearby muscular structures. Ventilation tube insertion (VTI) is regarded as an effective mean to address OME in addition to palatal repair surgery. However, controversy regarding the efficacy of VTI and the timing of VTI remains. We aimed to assess the efficacy of VTI with palatal repair for cleft palate on OME development via a meta-analysis with systematic review and trial sequential analysis (TSA). Studies including patients with cleft palate who underwent palatal repair with or without VTI were considered eligible. After searching the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from inception through 5 September 2021, 9 studies involving 929 patients were included. Overall, a significantly higher OME-free rate was noted in those who underwent VTI and palatal repair than in those who underwent palatal repair alone (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.37 to 5.42; p = 0.004; I2 = 84%). Subgroup analysis revealed that the OME-free rate remained higher in the concurrent VTI group (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.64 to 6.59; p < 0.001; I2 = 81%). TSA indicated that all the analyses provided conclusive results by meeting the required information size and Z-value. The meta-analysis indicated that VTI is an effective procedure to prevent OME in patients with cleft palate and that VTI is beneficial when performed concurrently with palatal repair surgery.

Assessing Adherence to Audiologic Parameters of Care for Children With Cleft Palate: A Quality Improvement Initiative

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and increase adherence to an evidence-based audiologic management protocol for children with cleft palate.

DESIGN

Prospective, multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative.

SETTING

Tertiary pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

Children with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) between the ages of 0 and 5 years (n = 205).

INTERVENTIONS

A multidisciplinary team identified key drivers for nonadherence to recommended audiological follow-up and implemented interventions to improve adherence. Key drivers included provider practices and preferences, clinic logistics and flow, and patient/family awareness and education. Several interventions were implemented between 2016 and 2020, including developing an evidence-based audiologic protocol, maximizing access to audiologic clinic visits across multiple departments, cleft team education, and improved team communication.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Completion of recommended audiologic assessment at 5 separate care milestones.

RESULTS

After implementation of interventions between 2016 and 2020, adherence to recommended audiologic follow-up increased from 59% to 84%. Analysis of individual care milestones revealed that increased access to audiologic testing during team clinics resulted in the largest increase in adherence to recommended follow-up. Additionally, cause-effect analysis revealed that nonadherence due to provider-related causes decreased over the project period to a greater extent than patient/family-related causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an evidence-based audiologic care protocol and improvements in access to early hearing care are feasible in a high-volume multidisciplinary cleft clinic. Adherence to recommended audiologic management can be improved by establishing strategies to improve access to care, team member and family education, and enhanced team communication.

Subannular Tubes in Children With Cleft Palate

OBJECTIVE

To investigate subannular tube (SAT) placement as an alternative treatment of chronic middle ear disease in children with cleft palate.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

All children with cleft palate with intractable otitis media with effusion and/or with tympanic membrane retraction, operated for insertion of 1 or more sets of transtympanic tubes followed by SAT in a tertiary center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Audiological outcomes, average duration of tubes, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

This study included 21 children with cleft palate, aged 3 to 14 years. A total of 38 ears was evaluated. The median time of follow-up was 42 months. During follow-up, 69.2% of the patients had no complications. Observed complications were otorrhea (13.5%) and tube obstruction (7.7%). In 7.9% of the cases, otitis media with effusion relapsed after tube extrusion. By the end of the study, 76.3% of the tubes remained in situ and 68.4% of the tympanic membranes had the SAT in place and had no significant alterations. The mean duration of SATs was 16 months, which was significantly superior to transtympanic tube duration. A significant sustained improvement in the hearing of children with SATs was observed.

CONCLUSION

Subannular tube insertion results in hearing improvement to normal range and tympanic retraction pockets reversion in children with cleft palate with persistent otitis media with effusion and tympanic retraction/atelectasis. This surgery appears to be safe and provides long-term efficient middle ear aeration. Strict postoperative follow-up is crucial for the success of the treatment.

Hearing Thresholds in Young Children With Otitis Media With Effusion With and Without Cleft Palate

Objective:

To investigate hearing thresholds in children born with cleft palate and in children with otitis media with effusion but no cleft palate.

Design:

Prospective longitudinal group comparison study.

Setting:

University hospital.

Participants:

Sixteen children born with nonsyndromic cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L) and 15 age-matched children with otitis media with effusion (OME) but without cleft.

Main Outcome Measures:

Hearing was tested at repeated occasions beginning with neonatal auditory brainstem response (ABR) at 1-4 months of age, and age-appropriate hearing tests from 9 to 36 months of age.

Results:

The median ABR thresholds in both groups were elevated but did not differ significantly. At 12 months of age, the median 4 frequency averages at 500-1000-2000-4000 Hz (4FA) were indicative of mild hearing loss but significantly better in the CP±L-group than in the group without cleft ( P < .01). There were no significant group-wise differences regarding the median 4FA at 24 and 36 months of age, and at 36 months, the median 4FA were normal in both groups. Both groups exhibited a significant improvement over time from the neonatal ABR thresholds to the 4FA at 36 months (CP±L-group P < .05; without CP±L-group P < .01).

Conclusion:

The hearing loss in children with CP±L was not more severe than among children with OME but without cleft palate; rather, at 12 months of age, the thresholds were significantly better in the CP±L-group than those in the group without cleft. The air conduction thresholds improved with age in both groups.

Contribution of the Use of a Pen-Type Endoscope to Evaluate and Treat Ears Simultaneously During Cleft Palate Surgery in Late Presented Cases

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of secretory otitis media is very high among the nonoperated cleft palate patients.

METHODS

Ninety-one cleft palate operations were performed on late presented cases in Sudan, Africa. The surgeries were performed according to the Veau-Wardill-Kilner push-back technique. A laptop connected pen-type endoscopic camera was used to evaluate the tympanic membrane and address middle ear disease in all patients simultaneously. The procedure was performed after removing wax from the external auditory canal. A small incision was made with a myringotomy knife through the layers of the tympanic membrane if any sign of fluid collection was observed, after which the middle ear effusion was evacuated and the ventilation tube was inserted.

RESULTS

This procedure was undertaken in 182 ears; 41 ears (22.5%) were healthy, 19 ears (10.5%) had chronic perforations, 122 ears (67%) underwent myringotomy procedures, and 54 (44.2%) were treated by inserting a ventilation tube. Despite the challenging work environment, standard monitoring facilities were available and all operations were completed with no early complications.

CONCLUSION

The pen-type camera instead of an operating microscope was a tremendous contribution, as it was easy to handle and contributed to the good outcomes. The use of this technique is strongly recommended in surgical camps.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Children with Cleft Palate: Predictors of Otologic Issues in the First 10 Years

Objective

To evaluate the characteristics of children with cleft palate associated with persistent otologic issues in the first 10 years of life.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Single academic center.

Subjects and Methods

Children born with cleft palate from 2003 to 2007 and treated by the UC Davis Cleft and Craniofacial Team between January 2003 and December 2017 were included in the study. Data from 143 patients were analyzed via Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher exact tests for univariate analysis and logistic regression to determine adjusted odds ratios.

Results

The median length of follow-up was 9.9 years, and the age at last ear examination was 10.7 years. At the last evaluation, unresolved otologic issues were common, with at least 1 ear having a tympanic membrane (TM) perforation (16.1%), a tympanostomy tube (36.2%), or conductive hearing loss (23.1%). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, history of palate revision or speech surgery was associated with having a TM perforation ( P = .02). The only clinical variables associated with conductive hearing loss was the presence of a TM perforation ( P < .01) or a genetic abnormality ( P = .02). Severity of palatal clefting was not associated with specific otologic or audiologic outcomes after adjusting for other characteristics.

Conclusion

A large proportion of children with cleft palate have persistent otologic issues at age 10 years and would benefit from continued close monitoring well after the age when most children have normalized eustachian tube function. Prolonged otologic issues were not found to be associated with cleft type.