Comparison of adenoid assessment by flexible endoscopy and mirror exam

150th Anniversary of global adenoid investigations: unanswered questions and unsolved problems

Although the problem of adenoid hypertrophy (AH) has been diagnosed and treated by doctors and scientists from around the world for the last 150 years, there is still no consensus regarding appropriate diagnosis, conservative treatment options, and qualification for surgery. This manuscript presents current knowledge on these issues and compares diagnostic methods and the effectiveness of treatment options. Factors that may influence the obtained treatment results are also described, and a questionnaire is proposed to compare the results of treatment. The objective of drawing attention to this problem is to obtain better results from conservative treatment in the future and better-qualified patients for surgical treatment.

Effectiveness of Evaluation of Adenoid Hypertrophy in Children by Flexible Nasopharyngoscopy Examination (FNE), Proposed Schema of Frequency of Examination: Cohort Study

Objectives: To demonstrate the effectiveness of endoscopic assessment of the pharyngeal tonsil in defining the size of the adenoid hypertrophy in endoscopic examination that would be equivalent to intraoperative assessment as a large adenoid, and to determine the lowest necessary frequency of tests to assess the variability of its size. Methods: The study is based on an analysis of two groups of children diagnosed and treated in a children’s ENT outpatient clinic and ENT department. In the first group, adenoid size was assessed based on flexible endoscopy, and then with a consequent adenoid surgery with assessment of the intraoperative size of the adenoid, we compared the size of the adenoid. The second part of the study included a group of 81 children. We analyzed performed flexible nasopharyngoscopy examinations (FNE) of each child, and compared the change of adenoid size in a minimum of two subsequent examinations over a period of 1 year or more. Results: The sensitivity of flexible endoscopic examination in the assessment of the pharyngeal tonsil was determined at 97.3%, and specificity at 72.7%. The ROC curve shows the value of adenoid-to-choana (A/C) ratio as 75% or more in the preoperative FNE, indicating that the tonsil during surgery is assessed as large. Among the children, 26.3% had a change in adenoid size of more than 15% in the A/C ratio in 1 year of observation, and 45% of the children had A/C ratio changed above 15% in a period of 3 years of observation. Conclusions: FNE examination is highly effective in assessing the size of the pharyngeal tonsil. We proposed a schema for frequencies of FNE examinations and treatment dependent on A/C ratio and worsening of ailments.

Versatility and Benefits of 4.0mm Flexible Nasal Endoscopy in 118 Children up to 10 Years of Age

Purpose

This retrospective study looked at the feasibility of using adult 4.0 mm flexible nasendoscopes (FNE) examination under local anesthetic (LA) in children three to 10 years old to diagnose adenoid hypertrophy (AH) and other conditions. We also looked for a correlation between the adenoid size on FNE and a) tonsil size, b) the typical symptoms of snoring, mouth breathing, impaired hearing, and apnoeic episodes c) the management options of otitis media with effusion (OME) and d) the adenoid size intraoperatively.

Methods

A retrospective, observational study of 118 children in an NHS pediatric otolaryngology clinic led by a single consultant. One hundred ten consecutive patients with suspected AH were divided into two groups of three to five years and six to 10 years. We compared the acceptance rate to FNE in two subgroups (three to five years and six to 10 years old) and examined the correlation between various parameters as outlined above, using the Chi-square test. Eight children underwent FNE for other reasons of change of voice and epistaxis.

Results

FNE was successfully performed in 86% of the patients without restraint. Thirty-three percent of patients had non-obstructive adenoids (OA) and did not require surgical intervention. The intraoperative adenoid size, symptoms of snoring, mouth-breathing, and apnoeic episodes positively correlated with OA; however, no correlation was seen with the tonsil size (p=0.1143). All patients with OA and type B tympanogram needed adenoidectomy and grommet insertion (p=0.0119), and those with type C curves recovered with adenoidectomy alone.

Conclusions

4.0 mm adult scope helped reach a definitive diagnosis for AH in most children above three years of age, thus proving cost-effective. The symptoms of snoring, mouth-breathing, and apnoeic episodes had a positive correlation to the presence of OA; however, the tonsil size was seen to be independent of adenoid size.

Primary surgical management can be considered the treatment of choice for all patients with OA and type B tympanogram without a trial of conservative therapy.

Modified adenoid grading system for evaluating adenoid size in children: a prospective validation study

Nasal endoscopy is the best choice for evaluation of adenoid size, but very few studies published on the endoscopic quantitative assessment. This study aimed to newly propose and validate a modified adenoid grading system (MAGS) with the existing endoscopic scoring methods of adenoid size. A prospective study on children with chronic mouth breathing and having endoscopic nasal examination was conducted. Digital images obtained during endoscopic examination were evaluated with the traditional method and the MGAS. Adenoid size was also evaluated by intraoperative nasal endoscopy among those underwent adenoidectomy. One hundred and thirty patients were enrolled. The MAGS showed high inter-rater reliability with a Kappa score of 0.869. Sixty of 130 patients underwent adenoidectomy and assessed with intraoperative nasal endoscopy. The MAGS significantly correlated to the percentage of nasopharyngeal obstruction of intraoperative endoscopy (Spearman's r = 0.796, gamma coefficient = 0.94), and the percentage of choanal obstruction of preoperative endoscopy (Spearman's r = 0.816, gamma coefficient = 0.859). Our findings suggest that the MAGS has high reliability and validity for assessment of adenoid size. It may be a more suitable and reliable grading system for endoscopic evaluation of adenoid size.