Dose-volume conundrum for response of prostate cancer to brachytherapy: summary dosimetric measures and their relationship to tumor control probability

AAPM Task Group Report 267: A joint AAPM GEC-ESTRO report on biophysical models and tools for the planning and evaluation of brachytherapy

Brachytherapy utilizes a multitude of radioactive sources and treatment techniques that often exhibit widely different spatial and temporal dose delivery patterns. Biophysical models, capable of modeling the key interacting effects of dose delivery patterns with the underlying cellular processes of the irradiated tissues, can be a potentially useful tool for elucidating the radiobiological effects of complex brachytherapy dose delivery patterns and for comparing their relative clinical effectiveness. While the biophysical models have been used largely in research settings by experts, it has also been used increasingly by clinical medical physicists over the last two decades. A good understanding of the potentials and limitations of the biophysical models and their intended use is critically important in the widespread use of these models. To facilitate meaningful and consistent use of biophysical models in brachytherapy, Task Group 267 (TG-267) was formed jointly with the American Association of Physics in Medicine (AAPM) and The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) to review the existing biophysical models, model parameters, and their use in selected brachytherapy modalities and to develop practice guidelines for clinical medical physicists regarding the selection, use, and interpretation of biophysical models. The report provides an overview of the clinical background and the rationale for the development of biophysical models in radiation oncology and, particularly, in brachytherapy; a summary of the results of literature review of the existing biophysical models that have been used in brachytherapy; a focused discussion of the applications of relevant biophysical models for five selected brachytherapy modalities; and the task group recommendations on the use, reporting, and implementation of biophysical models for brachytherapy treatment planning and evaluation. The report concludes with discussions on the challenges and opportunities in using biophysical models for brachytherapy and with an outlook for future developments.

Risk adaptive planning with biology-based constraints may lead to higher tumor control probability in tumors of the canine brain: A planning study

BACKGROUND

Classical radiation protocols are guided by physical dose delivered homogeneously over the target. Protocols are chosen to keep normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) at an acceptable level. Organs at risk (OAR) adjacent to the target volume could lead to underdosage of the tumor and a decrease of tumor control probability (TCP). The intent of our study was to explore a biology-based dose escalation: by keeping NTCP for OAR constant, radiation dose was to be maximized, allowing to result in heterogeneous dose distributions.

METHODS

We used computed tomography datasets of 25 dogs with brain tumors, previously treated with 10x4 Gy (40 Gy to PTV D50). We generated 3 plans for each patient: A) original treatment plan with homogeneous dose distribution, B) heterogeneous dose distribution with strict adherence to the same NTCPs as in A), and C) heterogeneous dose distribution with adherence to NTCP <5%. For plan comparison, TCPs and TCP equivalent doses (homogenous target dose which results in the same TCP) were calculated. To enable the use of the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) metric of the tumor target in plan optimization, the calculated TCP values were used to obtain the volume effect parameter a.

RESULTS

As intended, NTCPs for all OARs did not differ from plan A) to B). In plan C), however, NTCPs were significantly higher for brain (mean 2.5% (SD±1.9, 95%CI: 1.7,3.3), p<0.001), optic chiasm (mean 2.0% (SD±2.2, 95%CI: 1.0,2.8), p=0.010) compared to plan A), but no significant increase was found for the brainstem. For 24 of 25 of the evaluated patients, the heterogenous plans B) and C) led to an increase in target dose and projected increase in TCP compared to the homogenous plan A). Furthermore, the distribution of the projected individual TCP values as a function of the dose was found to be in good agreement with the population TCP model.

CONCLUSION

Our study is a first step towards risk-adaptive radiation dose optimization. This strategy utilizes a biologic objective function based on TCP and NTCP instead of an objective function based on physical dose constraints.

Influence of zonal dosimetry on prostate brachytherapy outcomes

Purpose

To examine the influence of zone-specific dosimetry on outcomes during permanent prostate implantation (PI), where the peripheral zone (PZ) and transitional zone (TZ) may receive varying radiation doses.

Material and methods

Four hundred and sixteen patients treated with I-125 PI (target dose: 144 Gy) between 1996 and 2003 were included in this Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, retrospective analysis. Whole prostate (WP), TZ, and PZ were contoured, and zone-specific D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ were computed. Their influence on biochemical failure (BF) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results

The median age and initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 68 years and 6.1 ng/ml, respectively, and the median follow-up time was 8.8 years. There were 329 subjects with Gleason score (GS) 6 disease (79.1%), and 82 subjects had GS 7 disease (19.7%). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was used in 20.4% of patients. Median D₉₀ and V_100% in the WP, PZ, and TZ were 141.2 Gy, 156.1 Gy, and 134.5 Gy; and 88.8%, 93.3%, and 84.2%, respectively. Ten-year rates for biochemical recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and prostate cancer-specific mortality were 82.4%, 92.4%, and 0.97% respectively. Only initial PSA, GS7+ disease, ADT, and PSA frequency were significant on multivariate analysis. Ten-year rates of grade 3 or higher GU and GI toxicity was 10.9% and 1.8%, respectively. TZ V₂₀₀ and TZ V₃₀₀ were significantly associated with late genitourinary toxicity.

Conclusions

The TZ received significantly lower doses of radiation compared to the PZ. On multivariate analysis, no dosimetric parameter was associated with efficacy. Higher TZ doses may be associated with higher late GU toxicity without improving efficacy.

Management of post-radiation therapy complications among prostate cancer patients: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Treating prostate cancer with radiation therapy (RT) is a viable option, albeit with its own profile of complications. We describe a unique Canadian report of a single surgeon (RJB) experience in the management of complex post-prostate cancer RT complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who had previously received external beam radiation (XRT) or brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer referred to a single surgeon for persistent urologic related difficulties between 2005 and 2010. We used the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) morbidity grading system to assign each patient a 1 to 5 grade for their greatest complication.

RESULTS

In total, 15 patients were identified with a total of 43 RT-related complications. Of these 43 complications, 19 presented with obstruction, 8 with radiation failure or new bladder cancer, 6 with hematuria, 5 with intractable incontinence, and 5 with urinary tract infections. These patients required several investigations prior to treatment. Treatment of these complications used surgical, local and medical approaches. In the end, 1 patient had total incontinence, 3 improved their incontinence, 3 had self-catheterization and dilation, 1 voided well, 3 underwent cystectomy with ileo-conduits, 2 had chronic hematuria, and 2 passed away.

CONCLUSION

These patients are heavily investigated and require significant resources, including patient visits, diagnostics and treatment modalities to optimize their condition. Cure is not always possible, but the aim to improve quality of life should guide management.

Multisector dosimetry in the immediate post-implant period: significant under dosage of the prostate base

Purpose

While there are several reports of prostate multisector dosimetry data obtained from CT or MRI scans performed at intervals ranging from 14-70 days after prostate brachytherapy (PB), there are no reports on multisector dosimetry performed in the immediate post-implant period. This study was undertaken to determine the results of prostate multisector dosimetry performed in the immediate post-implant period on day 1 post-implant dosimetry after ¹²⁵I PB.

Material and methods

The day 1 post-implant CT-based V₁₀₀ and D₉₀ were determined for the prostate base (PGB) and compared to doses to the entire gland (PG), mid-gland (PMG), and apex (PA) in 75 patients who underwent ¹²⁵I PB to a dose of 144 Gy. Similar multisector dosimetry was also performed on the pre-implant ultrasound volume study scans of these patients.

Results

All patients had good quality implants. On day 1 post-implant multisector dosimetry there was significant under dosage of the PGB for both V₁₀₀ and D₉₀. The average magnitude of under dosage of PGB compared to PMG and PA was 17.2% and 22.7% for V₁₀₀ and 44.6 Gy and 31.7 Gy for D₉₀, respectively. On pre-implant multisector dosimetry there was no statistically significant under dosage of the PGB for V₁₀₀, but the PGB D₉₀ was significantly lower compared to PMG and PA, however, the average magnitude of under dosage was small at 12.6 Gy and 4.2 Gy, respectively.

Conclusions

This report demonstrates that similar to other reports on more delayed post-implant multisector dosimetry data, there is significant under dosage of the prostate base in the immediate post-implant period based on day 1 post-implant dosimetry. The clinical significance of this under dosage remains to be defined and further studies are warranted.

Improved tumour control probability with MRI-based prostate brachytherapy treatment planning

BACKGROUND

Due to improved visibility on MRI, contouring of the prostate is improved compared to CT. The aim of this study was to quantify the benefits of using MRI for treatment planning as compared to CT-based planning for temporary implant prostate brachytherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

CT and MRI image data of 13 patients were used to delineate the prostate and organs at risk (OARs) and to reconstruct the implanted catheters (typically 12). An experienced treatment planner created plans on the CT-based structure sets (CT-plan) and on the MRI-based structure sets (MRI-plan). Then, active dwell-positions and weights of the CT-plans were transferred to the MRI-based structure sets (CT-plan(MRI-contours)) and resulting dosimetric parameters and tumour control probabilities (TCPs) were studied.

RESULTS

For the CT-plan(MRI-contours) a statistically significant lower target coverage was detected: mean V100 was 95.1% as opposed to 98.3% for the original plans (p < 0.01). Planning on CT caused cold-spots that influence the TCP. MRI-based planning improved the TCPs by 6-10%, depending on the parameters of the radiobiological model used for TCP calculation. Basing the treatment plan on either CT- or MRI-delineations does not influence plan quality.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of CT-based treatment planning by transferring the plan to MRI reveals underdosage of the prostate, especially at the base side. Planning on MRI can prevent cold-spots in the tumour and improves the TCP.

Segmental dosimetry, toxicity and long-term outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implants

WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: The development of side effects characteristic for the different treatment methods with impact on the patients' quality of life plays a growing role for individual patients with early stage prostate cancer. Using permanent brachytherapy a high dose to the prostate can be applied with a steep dose gradient to the normal tissue. However, small partial volumes of normal tissue may be exposed to high doses inducing special side effects including lower urinary tract symptoms and/or erectile dysfunction. In the literature there are only few publications so far regarding segmental dosimetry and its influence on side effects and the results are conflicting. We could not identify any dosimetric parameter in segmental dosimetry that may have an influence at certain time intervals on the development of side effects such as lower urinary tract symptoms or erectile dysfunction. However, we could state clearly that the preoperative situation is the most important factor for postoperative outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To report on the side effects of patients with low to low-intermediate risk prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy with special emphasis on segmental dosimetry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 186 consecutive patients treated for early stage prostate cancer receiving definitive I-125 brachytherapy (permanent seed implantation) between November 2001 and April 2005 at our institution were examined for the development of side effects. Morbidity was assessed prospectively using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) in a mean follow-up interval of 30 months. The scores were correlated with segmental dosimetry performed 6 weeks after the implantation.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative dose to 90% of the prostate volume (D90) was 180.2 Gy, the mean preoperative IPSS 7.2 and the mean IIEF-5 14.35, with all scores showing a maximum deterioration after 6 weeks with normalization after 24 months. After correlating the segmental dosimetry and the scores at different time intervals, only the baseline scores remained statistically significant in multivariate regression analysis at all time intervals (P < 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

We could not demonstrate a correlation of segmental dosimetry with induction of side effects. There is no relationship between dose exposure of partial volumes and the development of radiation-induced toxicities. The preoperative situation regarding lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile function are the most important factors for postoperative outcome.

An NTCP Analysis of Urethral Complications from Low Doserate Mono- and Bi-Radionuclide Brachytherapy

Urethral NTCP has been determined for three prostates implanted with seeds based on ¹²⁵I (145 Gy), ¹⁰³Pd (125 Gy), ¹³¹Cs (115 Gy), ¹⁰³Pd-¹²⁵I (145 Gy), or ¹⁰³Pd-¹³¹Cs (115 Gy or 130 Gy). First, DU₂₀, meaning that 20% of the urhral volume receive a dose of at least DU₂₀, is converted into an I-125 LDR equivalent DU₂₀ in order to use the urethral NTCP model. Second, the propagation of uncertainties through the steps in the NTCP calculation was assessed in order to identify the parameters responsible for large data uncertainties. Two sets of radiobiological parameters were studied. The NTCP results all fall in the 19%–23% range and are associated with large uncertainties, making the comparison difficult. Depending on the dataset chosen, the ranking of NTCP values among the six seed implants studied changes. Moreover, the large uncertainties on the fitting parameters of the urethral NTCP model result in large uncertainty on the NTCP value. In conclusion, the use of NTCP model for permanent brachytherapy is feasible but it is essential that the uncertainties on the parameters in the model be reduced.

A detailed radiobiological and dosimetric analysis of biochemical outcomes in a case-control study of permanent prostate brachytherapy patients

The purpose of this study is to determine dosimetric and radiobiological predictors of biochemical control after recalculation of prostate implant dosimetry using updated AAPM Task Group 43 (TG-43) parameters and the radiobiological parameters recommended by TG-137. All biochemical failures among patients implanted with 125I Or 103Pd sources between 1994 and March 2006 were matched 2:1 with nonfailure controls. The individual matching was by risk group, radionuclide, prescribed dose, and time of implant (one match before and one after the failed patient) resulting in a median follow-up of 10.9 years. Complete dose volume histogram (DVH) data were recalculated for all 55 cases and 110 controls after updating the original source strength by the retrospectively determined ratios of TG-43. Differential DVH data were acquired in 179 increments of prostate volume versus percentage prescribed dose. At each incremental dose level i, the biologically equivalent dose BEDi, equivalent uniform dose EUDi, and tumor control probability TCPi were calculated from the implant dose plus any external beam delivered to the patient. Total BED, EUD, and TCP were then derived from the incremental values for comparison with single point dosimetric quality parameters and DVH-based averages. There was no significant difference between failures and controls in terms of total BED (143 vs 142 Gy), EUD (95 vs 94 Gy), or TCP (0.87 vs 0.89). Conditional logistic regression analysis factored out the matching variables and stratified the cohort into each case and its controls, but no radiobiological parameter was predictive of biochemical failure. However, there was a significant difference between radiobiological parameters of 125I and 103Pd due to less complete coverage of the target volume by the former isotope. The implant BED and TCP were highly correlated with the D90 and natural prescription doses and a series of mean DVH-based doses such as the harmonic mean and expressions of the generalized EUD. In this case-control study of prostate brachytherapy biochemical failures and nonfailures, there were no radiobiological parameters derived from detailed DVH-based analysis that predicted for biochemical control. This may indicate that in our approach, implant dosimetry is at or near the limits of clinically effective dose escalation.

Quality assurance/quality control issues for intraoperative planning and adaptive repeat planning of image-guided prostate implants

The quality assurance/quality control purpose is this. We design a treatment plan, and we wish to be as certain as reasonably possible that the treatment is delivered as planned. In the case of conventionally planned prostate brachytherapy, implementing to the letter the implantation plan is rarely attainable and therefore can require adaptive replanning (a quality control issue). The reasons for this state of affairs include changes in the prostate shape and volume during implantation and treatment delivery (e.g., edema resolution) and unavoidable inaccuracy in the placement of the seeds in the prostate. As a result, quality-control activities (e.g., the need to monitor-ideally, on the fly-the target and urethral and rectal dosage) must be also addressed.

Biochemical disease-free survival rates following definitive low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with dose escalation to biologic target volumes identified with SPECT/CT capromab pendetide

PURPOSE

To report biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) after conformal brachytherapy with dose escalation to biological target volumes (BTVs) identified by Capromab Pendetide with single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography image fusion (SPECT/CT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred thirty-nine (T1c-T3b NxM0) consecutive patients were evaluated by SPECT/CT before treatment. Intraprostatic SPECT/CT BTVs were identified and targeted for 150% dose escalation during brachytherapy seed implant (SI). Patients received either SI alone (n = 150) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus SI boost (EBRT+SI) (n = 89), with (n = 50) and without (n = 189) neoadjuvant hormone ablation therapy. Risk factors (RF) (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >10 ng/mL, Stage > or = T2b, and Gleason grade > or = 7) defined risk group (RG) categories [none, 1, and > or = 2 RF define low, intermediate, and high RG] for bDFS calculations using four failure criteria: American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus definition, PSA >1.0 ng/mL (PSA >1), PSA >0.5 ng/mL after nadir (PSA >0.5), and PSA nadir+2 ng/mL rise in PSA clinical nadir (CN+2). Median followup was 47.2 months (range, 24.8-96.1).

RESULTS

Seven-year actuarial bDFS rates were 88.0%, 82.1%, 80.4%, and 79.9% using the ASTRO, PSA >1, PSA >0.5, and CN+2 failure criteria, respectively. ASTRO-defined bDFS rates were 96.0%, 87.0%, and 72.5% for low, intermediate, and high RG's.

CONCLUSION

The data presented here demonstrate the feasibility of performing SPECT/CT BTV dose escalation in a mature series.

Prostate volume contouring: a 3D analysis of segmentation using 3DTRUS, CT, and MR

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the reproducibility and modality differences of prostate contouring after brachytherapy implant using three-dimensional (3D) transrectal ultrasound (3DTRUS), T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR), and computed tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seven blinded observers contoured 10 patients' prostates, 30 day postimplant, on 3DTRUS, MR, and CT images to assess interobserver variability. Randomized images were contoured twice by each observer. We analyzed length and volume measurements and performed a 3D analysis of intra- and intermodality variation.

RESULTS

Average volume ratios were 1.16 for CT/MR, 0.90 for 3DTRUS/MR, and 1.30 for CT/3DTRUS. Overall contouring variability was largest for CT and similar for MR and 3DTRUS. The greatest variability of CT contours occurred at the posterior and anterior portions of the midgland. On MR, overall variability was smaller, with a maximum in the anterior region. On 3DTRUS, high variability occurred in anterior regions of the apex and base, whereas the prostate-rectum interface had the smallest variability. The shape of the prostate on MR was rounder, with the base and apex of similar size, whereas CT contours had broad, flat bases narrowing toward the apex. The average percent of surface area that was significantly different (95% confidence interval) for CT/MR was 4.1%; 3DTRUS/MR, 10.7%; and CT/3DTRUS, 6.3%. The larger variability of CT measurements made significant differences more difficult to detect.

CONCLUSIONS

The contouring of prostates on CT, MR, and 3DTRUS results in systematic differences in the locations of and variability in prostate boundary definition between modalities. MR and 3DTRUS display the smallest variability and the closest correspondence.

Rectal morbidity after permanent prostate brachytherapy with dose escalation to biologic target volumes identified by SPECT/CT fusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate rectal morbidity after dose escalation to biologic target volumes identified by capromab pendetide (ProstaScint) single-photon emission tomography images coregistered with computed tomography (SPECT/CT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred thirty-nine consecutive patients diagnosed with T1c-T3b NxM0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with brachytherapy seed implant (SI) dose escalation to SPECT/CT-identified biologic target volumes, from February 1997 through December 2002. Patients received SI (n=150) or external beam radiation therapy plus SI (n=89). Rectal morbidity was evaluated by clinician scoring using the modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The median followup was 47.2 (range 24.8-96.1) months.

RESULTS

The rate of acute Grades I and II toxicity was 29.9% and 3.7%, respectively, and chronic Grade I toxicity was 15.4%, 12.4%, 2.3%, and 1.8% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years postimplant, respectively. Chronic Grade II toxicities were 1.8%, 1.9%, 1.5%, and 0.9% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. No Grade III rectal toxicity was reported. Chronic Grade IV rectal toxicity was 0.5% and 0.6% at 1.5 and 2.5 years, respectively. Ninety-six percent of patients reported freedom from all rectal toxicity after 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose intensification to occult tumor targets without increasing rectal toxicity may be achieved using SPECT/CT ProstaScint. Additional research to define the role of molecular imaging in prostate cancer is warranted.

Effects of seed migration on post-implant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy

Brachytherapy using permanent seed implants has been an effective treatment for prostate cancer. However, seeds will migrate after implant, thus making the evaluation of post-implant dosimetry difficult. In this study, we developed a computer program to simulate seed migration and analyzed dosimetric changes due to seed migration at various migration amounts. The study was based on 14 patients treated with Pd-103 at the James Cancer Hospital. Modeling of seed migration, including direction, distance as well as day of migration, was based on clinical observations. Changes of commonly used dosimetric parameters as a function of migration amount (2, 4, 6 mm respectively), prostate size (from 20 to 90 cc), and prostate region (central vs peripheral) were studied. Change of biological outcome (tumor control probability) due to migration was also estimated. Migration reduced prostate D90 to 99+/-2% of original value in 2 mm migration, and the reduction increased to 94+/-6% in 6 mm migration. The reduction of prostate dose led to a 14% (40%) drop in the tumor control probability for 2 mm (6 mm) migration, assuming radiosensitive tumors. However, migration has less effect on a prostate implanted with a larger number of seeds. Prostate V100 was less sensitive to migration than D90 since its mean value was still 99% of original value even in 6 mm migration. Migration also showed a different effect in the peripheral region vs the central region of the prostate, where the peripheral mean dose tended to drop more significantly. Therefore, extra activity implanted in the peripheral region during pre-plan can be considered. The detrimental effects of migration were more severe in terms of increasing the dose to normal structures, as rectum V50 may be 70% higher and urethra V100 may be 50% higher in the case of 6 mm migration. Quantitative knowledge of these effects is helpful in treatment planning and post-implant evaluation.

Real-time computed tomography dosimetry during ultrasound-guided brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Ultrasound-guided implantation of permanent radioactive seeds is a treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Several techniques have been described for the optimal placement of the seeds in the prostate during this procedure. Postimplantation dosimetric calculations are performed after the implant. Areas of underdosing can only be corrected with either an external beam boost or by performing a second implant. We demonstrate the feasibility of performing computed tomography (CT)-based postplanning during the ultrasound-guided implant and subsequently correcting for underdosed areas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ultrasound-guided brachytherapy is performed on a modified CT table with general anesthesia. The postplanning CT scan is performed after the implant, while the patient is still under anesthesia. Additional seeds are implanted into "cold spots," and the resultant dosimetry confirmed with CT.

RESULTS

Intraoperative postplanning was successfully performed. Dose-volume histograms demonstrated adequate dose coverage during the initial implant, but on detailed analysis, for some patients, areas of underdosing were observed either at the apex or the peripheral zone. Additional seeds were implanted to bring these areas to prescription dose.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative postplanning is feasible during ultrasound-guided brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Although the postimplant dose-volume histograms for all patients, before the implantation of additional seeds, were adequate according to the American Brachytherapy Society criteria, specific critical areas can be underdosed. Additional seeds can then be implanted to optimize the dosimetry and reduce the risk of underdosing areas of cancer.

Fundamental form of a population TCP model in the limit of large heterogeneity

A population tumor control probability (TCP) model for fractionated external beam radiotherapy, based on Poisson statistics and in the limit of large parameter heterogeneity, is studied. A reduction of a general eight-parameter TCP equation, which incorporates heterogeneity in parameters characterizing linear-quadratic radiosensitivity, repopulation, and clonogen number, to an equation with four parameters is obtained. The four parameters represent the mean and standard deviation for both clonogen number and a generalized radiosensitivity that includes linear-quadratic and repopulation descriptors. Further, owing to parameter inter-relationship, it is possible to express these four parameters as three ratios of parameters in the large heterogeneity limit. These ratios can be directly linked to two defining features of the TCP dose response: D50 and gamma50. In the general case, the TCP model can be written in terms of D50, gamma50 and a third parameter indicating the ratio of the levels of heterogeneity in clonogen number and generalized radiosensitivity; however, the third parameter is unnecessary when either of these two sources of heterogeneity is dominant. It is shown that heterogeneity in clonogen number will have little impact on the TCP formula for clinical scenarios, and thus it will generally be the case that the fundamental form of the Poisson-based population TCP model can be specified completely in terms of D50 and gamma50: TCP= 1/2 erfc[square root of pi(gamma50)(D50/D-1)]. This implies that limited radiobiological information can be determined by the analysis of dose response data: information about parameter ratios can be ascertained, but knowledge of absolute values for the fundamental radiobiological parameters will require independent auxiliary measurements.

Computing intraoperative dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy using TRUS and fluoroscopy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

There is a need to provide real-time dosimetric feedback during prostate brachytherapy based on the location of the implanted seeds. The objective of our approach is to develop a system to accurately locate seeds with minimal impact on the current protocol for prostate brachytherapy and without additional imaging equipment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A new approach for intraoperatively computing dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy is presented. The approach uses transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and fluoroscopic images. A fluoroscopic image of the TRUS probe is required to register the fluoroscopic and ultrasound images. The C-arm is not moved during the procedure and all images are acquired from the same C-arm angles. A needle path is interpolated for each needle based on the location of the needle tip in TRUS images and the known entry point of the needle. Throughout the procedure, fluoroscopic images are acquired to determine the coronal plane coordinates of the seeds and the remaining coordinate of each seed is computed from the needle path. For accurate results, intraoperative seed motion tracking is advised and a method to achieve such tracking is also presented.

RESULTS

Experimentally, the TRUS and fluoroscopic images are registered with a mean and maximum error of 1.3 mm and 5.8 mm, respectively. In a phantom, 12 seeds are located using our approach and compared with the known locations, with a mean error in the x, y, and z direction of 0.96 mm, 0.33, and 0.68 mm, respectively, and a corresponding maximum error of 1.85 mm, 0.56 mm, and 1.63 mm. Experimental results show motion tracking in the y-direction with submillimeter accuracy. The feasibility of our approach is tested on five cases of clinical data using a semiautomated version of our system and the resulting dosimetry is compared with that found using postoperative computed tomography images. The D90 and V100 metrics computed using our approach and the computed tomography images differ by a maximum of 16.6% and 1.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TRUS can be combined with single pose fluoroscopic images to compute delivered dose intraoperatively for prostate brachytherapy. Phantom results demonstrate the accuracy of the method and preliminary clinical results show its potential.

CT–ultrasound fusion prostate brachytherapy: A dynamic dosimetry feedback and improvement method. A report of 54 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

The authors describe a prostate brachytherapy technique with dynamic dosimetry feedback, using coregistered CT and ultrasound (US) images, to map initial dosimetry deficiencies and guide remedial source placement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-four consecutive patients treated with this method were analyzed for coregistration accuracy and dosimetry outcomes by evaluating the prostate V100, V150, D90, and urethral D50 and D10. Dosimetric improvements created by remedial source placement and preplan/postplan prostate D90 agreement were evaluated.

RESULTS

Median CT-US coregistration discrepancy with this technique ranged from 0 to 4mm, with the posterior midline prostate and base prostate providing the least consistent and the urethra providing the most consistent coregistration agreement. Final prostate V100 values ranged from 96.1% to 99.8% for all patients. The addition of remedial sources directed by CT-US fusion produced V100 and D90 improvements whose magnitude inversely correlated with the initial result and exceeded the effect of adding quantitatively identical randomly distributed increased millicuries. The final prostate D90 result agreed within (-) 5% to (+) 10% of the preplan result in 98% of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-US fusion prostate brachytherapy represents a dynamic dosimetry feedback and remediation method that consistently produced high prostate V100 and D90 values with acceptably low urethra D50 and D10 values in our study. The degree of prostate V100 and D90 dosimetry improvement created by remedial source placement effectively matched the degree of initial dosimetry deficiency. This method produced a high level of correlation between the preplan and final prostate D90 values.

Comparison ofin vitroandin vivo / ratios for prostate cancer

Parallel in vitro and in vivo studies provide insight into the relationship between clinical response and intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity and may aid in the development of predictive assays. Compilations of radiosensitivity parameters from in vitro experiments can also be used to examine the potential effectiveness of alternative or new treatment plan designs until enough clinical data become available to directly estimate the requisite radiosensitivity parameters. In this work, survival data for six prostate cancer cell lines (ten datasets total) have been extracted from the literature and re-analysed using the linear-quadratic (LQ) survival model. The paired bootstrap technique for regression is used to compute 95% confidence intervals for the estimated radiosensitivity parameters. LQ radiosensitivity parameters derived from the in vitro data are then compared to radiosensitivity parameters derived from clinical data for prostate cancer. Estimates of alpha range from 0.09 to 0.35 Gy(-1) (all cell lines), and the alpha/beta ratio ranges from 1.09 to 6.29 Gy (all cell lines). Point estimates of the repair half-time (PPC-1, TSU-Pr1, PC-3 and DU-145 cell lines) range from 5.7 to 8.9 h (95% confidence interval from 0.26 h to 10.7 h). Differences in the radiosensitivity parameters determined from the data reported by different laboratories are as large as or larger than the differences in radiosensitivity parameters observed among the various prostate cell lines. The reported studies demonstrate that even seemingly small corrections for dose rate effects, such as those expected in high dose rate (HDR) experiments, can sometimes have a significant impact on estimates of alpha and alpha/beta. By neglecting dose rate effects in the analysis of HDR experiments, estimates of the alpha/beta, ratio may be too high by factors as large as 1.3 to 6.2. The half-time for repair derived from the in vitro experiments appears significantly larger (slower repair rate) than estimates derived from the clinical data. However, the prostate radiosensitivity parameters alpha and alpha/beta may be approximately the same in vitro and in vivo. Most of the in vitro data are consistent with an alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer less than 3 or 4 Gy.