1
|
Rheaume AR, Pietrosanu M, Ostertag C, Sankar T. Repeat Surgery for Recurrent or Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2024; 185:370-380.e2. [PMID: 38403014 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surgery can effectively treat Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), but postoperative pain recurrence or nonresponse are common. Repeat surgery is frequently offered but limited data exist to guide the selection of salvage surgical procedures. We aimed to compare pain relief outcomes after repeat microvascular decompression (MVD), percutaneous rhizotomy (PR), or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to determine which modality was most efficacious for surgically refractory TN. METHODS A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, including studies of adults with classical or idiopathic TN undergoing repeat surgery. Primary outcomes included complete (CPR) and adequate (APR) pain relief at last follow-up, analyzed in a multivariate mixed-effect meta-regression of proportions. Secondary outcomes were initial pain relief and facial numbness. RESULTS Of 1299 records screened, 61 studies with 68 treatment arms (29 MVD, 14 PR, and 25 SRS) comprising 2165 patients were included. Combining MVD, PR, and SRS study data, 68.8% achieved initial CPR after a repeat TN procedure. On average, 49.6% of the combined sample of MVD, PR, and SRS had CPR at final follow-up, which was on average 2.99 years postoperatively. The proportion (with 95% CI) achieving CPR at final follow-up was 0.57 (0.51-0.62) for MVD, 0.60 (0.52-0.68) for PR, and 0.35 (0.30-0.41) for SRS, with a significantly lower proportion of pain relief with SRS. Estimates of initial CPR for MVD were 0.82 (0.78-0.85), 0.68 for PR (0.6-0.76), and 0.41 for SRS (0.35-0.48). CONCLUSIONS Across MVD, PR, and SRS, about half of TN patients maintain complete CPR at an average follow-up time of 3 years after repeat surgery. In treating refractory or recurrent TN, MVD and PR were superior to SRS in both initial pain relief and long-term pain relief at final follow-up. These findings can inform surgical decision-making in this challenging population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan R Rheaume
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthew Pietrosanu
- Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Curtis Ostertag
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tejas Sankar
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guillemette A, Roberge D, Heymann S, Ménard C, Bahary JP, Fournier-Gosselin MP. Repeat CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Outcomes and Complications. Can J Neurol Sci 2024; 51:272-277. [PMID: 37154078 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2023.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CyberKnife radiosurgery (RS), as an initial first treatment, is recognized as an efficient and safe modality for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, knowledge on repeat CyberKnife RS in refractory cases is limited. The objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of repeat CyberKnife RS for TN. METHODS A retrospective review of 33 patients with refractory TN treated a second time with CyberKnife RS from 2009 to 2021. The median follow-up period after the second RS was 26.0 months (range 0.3-115.8). The median dose for the repeat RS was 60 Gy (range 60.0-70.0). Pain relief after the intervention was assessed using the Barrow Neurological Institute scale for pain (I-V). Scores I to IIIb were classified as an adequate pain relief and scores IV-V were classified as a treatment failure. RESULTS After the second RS, initial adequate pain relief was achieved in 87.9% of cases. The actuarial probabilities of maintaining an adequate pain relief at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 92.1%, 74.0%, 58.2%, and 58.2%, respectively. Regarding sustained pain relief, there was no significant difference between the first and the second RS. Sensory toxicity after the first RS was predictive of a better outcome following the second RS. The onset of hypesthesia rate was the same after the first or the second RS (21%). CONCLUSION Repeat RS is an effective and safe method for the treatment of refractory TN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Guillemette
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sami Heymann
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Service of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Cynthia Ménard
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean-Paul Bahary
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie-Pierre Fournier-Gosselin
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Service of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal (UdeM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Franzini A, Picozzi P, Baram A, Navarria P, Scorsetti M, Tomatis S, Pessina F. Repeat Gamma Knife radiosurgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia in patients with multiple sclerosis: a single-center retrospective study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2024; 166:15. [PMID: 38227059 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-05913-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has emerged as an effective treatment option for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, the outcomes of repeat GKRS for patients with TN and MS with recurrent pain have been investigated in a few patients. This study aims to report the outcomes and predictive factors of pain reduction for MS patients undergoing repeat GKRS for recurrent TN. METHODS Eighteen patients with MS underwent repeat GKRS for recurrent TN. A retrospective chart review and telephone interviews were conducted to determine background medical history, dosimetric data, and outcomes of the procedure. Facial pain and sensory function were evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scales. RESULTS Fifteen patients achieved a BNI pain score of IIIa or better, indicating pain reduction, within a median period of 21 days after repeat GKRS. The maximum dose for repeat GKRS ranged from 70 to 85 Gy. Pain recurred in 5 patients after a median period of 12 months after GKRS. Percentages of patients with pain reduction at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 years were 60%, 60%, 50%, 50%, and 50%, respectively. Older age at repeat GKRS predicted sustained pain reduction (P = 0.01). Seven patients developed facial sensory disturbances, which were bothersome in two patients. CONCLUSIONS Repeat GKRS may be used as an effective treatment modality for prolonging the duration of pain reduction time in patients with MS and TN. After repeat GKRS, facial sensory disturbances are common; however, they are often not bothersome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy.
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Ali Baram
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Federico Pessina
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee S, Lee JI. Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia : Review and Update. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2022; 65:633-639. [PMID: 35774033 PMCID: PMC9452385 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is the starting point for optimal treatment. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is currently regarded as one of the first-line treatment options for medically refractory TN. GKRS is a less invasive treatment with a low risk of complications than other surgical procedures that provides a favorable pain control (BNI I–IIIb) rate of >75% at short-term follow-up. Drawbacks of GKRS include the latency period before pain relief and higher recurrence rate compared with microvascular decompression. Therefore, repeat treatment is necessary if the initial GKRS was effective but followed by recurrence. The concept of dose rate and the biologically effective dose of radiation has been actively studied in radiation oncology and is also applied in GKRS for TN to achieve high safety and efficacy by prescribing the optimal dose. Recent progress in functional imaging, such as diffusion tensor imaging, enables us to understand the pathophysiology of TN and predict the clinical outcome after GKRS. Here, we review TN, GKRS, and recent updates, especially in the concepts of radiation dose, diffusion tensor imaging studies, and repeat treatment in GKRS for TN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seunghoon Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Il Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ganz JC. Trigeminal neuralgia and other cranial pain syndromes. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2022; 268:347-378. [PMID: 35074090 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Spontaneous Trigeminal Neuralgia is a painful condition of the face which may require interventional treatment if medicines fail to control the pain. These include microvascular decompression (MVD) and GKNS. The former is moderately more effective but GKNS has become accepted both as an alternative to MVD or as an adjunct. Like all treatments of the condition, it is successful in a majority of patients but by no means all. Repeat treatments are possible. When Trigeminal Neuralgia is secondary to other conditions the response to GKNS is different. With AVMs, Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae and Epidermoids, the dose to treat the visible lesion usually cures the neuralgia. With meningiomas it is necessary to treat the neuralgia as a separate entity with a neuralgia dose focused on the nerve. GKNS does not improve the rare neuralgia associated with Vestibular Schwannomas. It works with Multiple Sclerosis but not as well as with the spontaneous illness. There is some evidence that GKNS can be useful with the rare Glossopharyngeal and Sphenopalatine Neuralgias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C Ganz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xu R, Xie ME, Jackson CM. Trigeminal Neuralgia: Current Approaches and Emerging Interventions. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3437-3463. [PMID: 34764686 PMCID: PMC8572857 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s331036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) has been described in the literature as one of the most debilitating presentations of orofacial pain. This review summarizes over 150 years of collective clinical experience in the medical and surgical treatment of TN. Fundamentally, TN remains a clinical diagnosis that must be distinguished from other types of trigeminal neuropathic pain and/or facial pain associated with other neuralgias or headache syndromes. What is increasingly clear is that there is no catch-all medical or surgical intervention that is effective for all patients with trigeminal neuralgia, likely reflective of the fact that TN is likely a heterogenous group of disorders that jointly manifests in facial pain. The first-line treatment for TN remains anticonvulsant medical therapy. Patients who fail this have a range of surgical options available to them. In general, microvascular decompression is a safe and effective procedure with immediate and durable outcomes. Patients who are unable to tolerate general anesthesia or whose medical comorbidities preclude a suboccipital craniectomy may benefit from percutaneous methodologies including glycerol or radiofrequency ablation, or both. For patients with bleeding diathesis due to blood thinning medications who are ineligible for invasive procedures, or for those who are unwilling to undergo open surgical procedures, radiosurgery may be an excellent option-provided the patient understands that maximum pain relief will take on the order of months to achieve. Finally, peripheral neurectomies continue to provide an inexpensive and resource-sparing alternative to pain relief for patients in locations with limited economic and medical resources. Ultimately, elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying trigeminal neuralgia will pave the way for novel, more effective and less invasive therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Risheng Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael E Xie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher M Jackson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery in the management of multiple sclerosis-related trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44:3069-3077. [PMID: 33611721 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01507-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is the most frequent craniofacial pain condition, which commonly affects patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS). Stereotactic radiosurgery, especially Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS), represents a safe and effective treatment for TN, and it has been adopted also for MS-TN, with a lower success rate. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the outcome of GKRS for MS-TN. PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar and the reference list of relevant articles were searched for GKRS in MS-TN. Two investigators independently identified the articles, assessed the study quality, and extracted the data. Endpoints of interest were initial pain responders, successful treatments at the end of follow-up, and factors influencing the outcome. Data analyses were performed using R software. Twelve articles involving 646 patients met our inclusion criteria. Pooled proportion of patients who experienced an initial response to GKRS treatment was 83% (CI 74-90%). The cumulative proportion of successful treatments at the end of follow-up was 47% (CI 33-60%). No variables were found to have a significant contribution to heterogeneity regarding the initial response outcome. The only variable significantly explaining the heterogeneity found in the proportion of successful treatments was the length of the follow-up, with a negative b coefficient (- 0.0051, p value = 0.0047). Regarding the efficacy of GKRS in MS-TN, the initial pain response rate was 83%, which dramatically decreases to 47% during follow-up. GKRS still represents a valuable option for MS-TN; however, its long-term efficacy should be always considered.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lehrer EJ, Prabhu AV, Sindhu KK, Lazarev S, Ruiz-Garcia H, Peterson JL, Beltran C, Furutani K, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP, Trifiletti DM. Proton and Heavy Particle Intracranial Radiosurgery. Biomedicines 2021; 9:31. [PMID: 33401613 PMCID: PMC7823941 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9010031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involves the delivery of a highly conformal ablative dose of radiation to both benign and malignant targets. This has traditionally been accomplished in a single fraction; however, fractionated approaches involving five or fewer treatments have been delivered for larger lesions, as well as lesions in close proximity to radiosensitive structures. The clinical utilization of SRS has overwhelmingly involved photon-based sources via dedicated radiosurgery platforms (e.g., Gamma Knife® and Cyberknife®) or specialized linear accelerators. While photon-based methods have been shown to be highly effective, advancements are sought for improved dose precision, treatment duration, and radiobiologic effect, among others, particularly in the setting of repeat irradiation. Particle-based techniques (e.g., protons and carbon ions) may improve many of these shortcomings. Specifically, the presence of a Bragg Peak with particle therapy at target depth allows for marked minimization of distal dose delivery, thus mitigating the risk of toxicity to organs at risk. Carbon ions also exhibit a higher linear energy transfer than photons and protons, allowing for greater relative biological effectiveness. While the data are limited, utilization of proton radiosurgery in the setting of brain metastases has been shown to demonstrate 1-year local control rates >90%, which are comparable to that of photon-based radiosurgery. Prospective studies are needed to further validate the safety and efficacy of this treatment modality. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of clinical evidence in the use of particle therapy-based radiosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (E.J.L.); (K.K.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Arpan V. Prabhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UAMS Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| | - Kunal K. Sindhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (E.J.L.); (K.K.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Stanislav Lazarev
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (E.J.L.); (K.K.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA; (H.R.-G.); (J.L.P.); (C.B.); (K.F.)
| | - Jennifer L. Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA; (H.R.-G.); (J.L.P.); (C.B.); (K.F.)
| | - Chris Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA; (H.R.-G.); (J.L.P.); (C.B.); (K.F.)
| | - Keith Furutani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA; (H.R.-G.); (J.L.P.); (C.B.); (K.F.)
| | - David Schlesinger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA; (D.S.); (J.P.S.)
| | - Jason P. Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA; (D.S.); (J.P.S.)
| | - Daniel M. Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA; (H.R.-G.); (J.L.P.); (C.B.); (K.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eng TY, Abugideiri M, Chen TW, Madden N, Morgan T, Tanenbaum D, Wandrey N, Westergaard S, Xu K, Jane Sudmeier L. Radiation Therapy for Benign Disease: Keloids, Macular Degeneration, Orbital Pseudotumor, Pterygium, Peyronie Disease, Trigeminal Neuralgia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2019; 34:229-251. [PMID: 31739946 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Although the use of ionizing radiation on malignant conditions has been well established, its application on benign conditions has not been fully accepted and has been inadequately recognized by health care providers outside of radiation therapy. Most frequently, radiation therapy in these benign conditions is used along with other treatment modalities, such as surgery, when the condition causes significant disability or could even lead to death. Radiation therapy can be helpful for inflammatory/proliferative disorders. This article discusses the present use of radiation therapy for some of the most common benign conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Y Eng
- Radiation Oncology Department, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Building C, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| | - Mustafa Abugideiri
- Radiation Oncology Department, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Building C, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Tiffany W Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Nicholas Madden
- Radiation Oncology Department, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Building C, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Tiffany Morgan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Building C, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Daniel Tanenbaum
- Radiation Oncology Department, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Building C, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Narine Wandrey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Sarah Westergaard
- Radiation Oncology Department, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Building C, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Karen Xu
- Radiation Oncology Department, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Building C, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Lisa Jane Sudmeier
- Radiation Oncology Department, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Building C, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patra DP, Savardekar AR, Dossani RH, Narayan V, Mohammed N, Nanda A. Repeat Gamma Knife radiosurgery versus microvascular decompression following failure of GKRS in trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2019; 131:1197-1206. [PMID: 30485193 DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.jns18583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN); however, considering that almost half of the patients experience post-GKRS failure or lesion recurrence, a repeat treatment is typically necessary. The existing literature does not offer clear evidence to establish which treatment modality, repeat GKRS or microvascular decompression (MVD), is superior. The present study aimed to compare the overall outcome of patients who have undergone either repeat GKRS or MVD after failure of their primary GKRS; the authors do so by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature and analysis of data from their own institution. METHODS The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases to identify studies describing patients who underwent either repeat GKRS or MVD after initial failed GKRS for TN. The primary outcomes were complete pain relief (CPR) and adequate pain relief (APR) at 1 year. The secondary outcomes were rate of postoperative facial numbness and the retreatment rate. The pooled data were analyzed with R software. Bias and heterogeneity were assessed using funnel plots and I2 tests, respectively. A retrospective analysis of a series of patients treated by the authors who underwent repeat GKRS or MVD after post-GKRS failure or relapse is presented. RESULTS A total of 22 studies met the selection criteria and were included for final data retrieval and meta-analysis. The search did not identify any study that had directly compared outcomes between patients who had undergone repeat GKRS versus those who had undergone MVD. Therefore, the authors' final analysis included two groups: studies describing outcome after repeat GKRS (n = 17) and studies describing outcome after MVD (n = 5). The authors' institutional study was the only study with direct comparison of the two cohorts. The pooled estimates of primary outcomes were APR in 83% of patients who underwent repeat GKRS and 88% of those who underwent MVD (p = 0.49), and CPR in 46% of patients who underwent repeat GKRS and 72% of those who underwent MVD (p = 0.02). The pooled estimates of secondary outcomes were facial numbness in 32% of patients who underwent repeat GKRS and 22% of those who underwent MVD (p = 0.11); the retreatment rate was 19% in patients who underwent repeat GKRS and 13% in those who underwent MVD (p = 0.74). The authors' institutional study included 42 patients (repeat GKRS in 15 and MVD in 27), and the outcomes 1 year after retreatment were APR in 80% of those who underwent repeat GKRS and 81% in those who underwent MVD (p = 1.0); CPR was achieved in 47% of those who underwent repeat GKRS and 44% in those who underwent MVD (p = 1.0). There was no difference in the rate of postoperative facial numbness or retreatment. CONCLUSIONS The current meta-analysis failed to identify any superiority of one treatment over the other with comparable outcomes in terms of APR, postoperative facial numbness, and retreatment rates. However, MVD was shown to provide a better chance of CPR compared with repeat GKRS.
Collapse
|
11
|
Alonso CE, Bunevicius A, Trifiletti DM, Larner J, Lee CC, Pai FY, Liscak R, Kosak M, Kano H, Sisterson ND, Mathieu D, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP. Safety and efficacy of repeat radiosurgery for acromegaly: an International Multi-Institutional Study. J Neurooncol 2019; 145:301-307. [PMID: 31541405 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03296-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical resection is the first line treatment for growth hormone (GH) secreting tumors. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is recommended for patients who do not achieve endocrine remission after resection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of repeat radiosurgery for acromegaly. METHODS Three hundred and ninety-eight patients with acromegaly treated with the Gamma Knife radiosurgery (Elekta AB, Stockholm) were identified from the International Gamma Knife Research Foundation database. Among these, 21 patients underwent repeated SRS with sufficient endocrine follow-up and 18 patients had sufficient imaging follow-up. Tumor control was defined as lack of adenoma progression on imaging. Endocrine remission was defined as a normal IGF-1 concentration while off medical therapy. RESULTS Median time from initial SRS to repeat SRS was 5.0 years. The median imaging and endocrine follow-up duration after repeat SRS was 3.4 and 3.8 years, respectively. The median initial marginal dose was 17 Gy, and the median repeat marginal dose was 23 Gy. Of the 18 patients with adequate imaging follow up, 15 (83.3%) patients had tumor control and of 21 patients with endocrine follow-up, 9 (42.9%) patients had endocrine remission at last follow-up visit. Four patients (19.0%) developed new deficits after repeat radiosurgery. Of these, 3 patients had neurologic deficits and 1 patient had endocrine deficit. CONCLUSIONS Repeat radiosurgery for persistent acromegaly offers a reasonable benefit to risk profile for this challenging patient cohort. Further studies are needed to identify patients best suited for this type of approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clayton E Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Adomas Bunevicius
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - James Larner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Yuan Pai
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mikulas Kosak
- 3rd Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Repeat gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A single-center experience and focused review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 70:102-107. [PMID: 31447361 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Repeat Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSR) for refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) is an increasingly common practice. Prior studies have reported varying success rates and incidence of trigeminal nerve dysfunction following repeated GKSR. We report treatment outcomes and toxicity in patients following repeat GKSR for TGN at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) with a focused review of the literature. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 55 TGN patients re-treated with radiosurgery using the Leksell Gamma Knife® at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 1996 and 2012. Outcomes were defined using the Modified Marseille Scale. Demographics, prior treatments and symptom duration were correlated with outcomes. RESULTS Eighteen patients (33%) achieved Marseille Class I or II, 14 (25%) Class III or IV, and 23 (42%) Class V at a mean follow-up of 14.4 months. Twenty-five patients (45%) developed new trigeminal nerve dysfunction after re-treatment. Of these, four (16%) did not develop dysfunction until subsequent microvascular decompression (MVD) for inadequate symptom relief. CONCLUSIONS Although more than half of the patients undergoing repeat GKSR for refractory TGN maintained excellent or good outcomes (Marseille classes I-IV) at an average follow-up of 14.4 months, neither age, gender, nor pre-treatment duration of symptoms or interval between treatments had a statistically significant effect on outcomes. Following repeat GKSR, patients have increased risk for new-onset trigeminal nerve dysfunction and those undergoing MVD after repeat GKSR may have an increased risk for new-onset trigeminal nerve dysfunction.
Collapse
|
13
|
Somaza S, Montilla EM, Mora MC. Gamma knife radiosurgery on the trigeminal ganglion for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: Results and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 2019; 10:89. [PMID: 31528427 PMCID: PMC6744789 DOI: 10.25259/sni-134-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the present study, we evaluate the results of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) using the trigeminal ganglion (TG') and the adjacent fibers of trigeminal nerve as a target. Methods From February 2013 to July 2017, we treated 30 cases of TN with GKS. In this group, all patients had an idiopathic typical TN. The radiosurgical target was conformed through two isocenters, 8 and 4 mm at the cavum de Meckel. The maximum dose was 86 Gy using the isodose line of 50%. The median age of the patients was 58.5 (range 28-94) years old, and the median time from diagnosis to GKS was 94 months (range 13-480 months). The median follow-up was 28.5 (range 12-49) months. Clinical outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors that correlated with a favorable, pain-free outcome. Results The mean time to relief of pain was 7 (range 1-40) days. The percentage of patients with significant pain relief was 93.3%. Relapse in pain was noted in four patients at 3, 16, 19, and 36 months. Nine patients were treated in acute status. Fourteen patients had intense pain between 1 and 7 days before the procedure. Among those with the recurrence of their symptoms, one patient had a microvascular decompression. Multivariate regression adjusted for age and sex suggests that, by 40 months, 70% of the patients treated with radiosurgery will remain pain free. At the last follow-up, GKS resulted in pain relief in 86.6% of patients. Our analysis suggests that, using this technique, we can expect that approximately 70% of patients with TN will have some degree of pain improvement at 3 years' post radiosurgery. Conclusions GKS on TG appears to be a reasonable treatment option with short latency period, minor collateral effects, and high percentage of pain control. The mechanism of action of radiosurgery could be related to the inactivation of the satellite glial cells in the TG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvador Somaza
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Centro Diagnostico Docente Las Mercedes, Hospital de Clinicas Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Eglee M Montilla
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Centro Diagnostico Docente Las Mercedes, Hospital de Clinicas Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Maria C Mora
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martínez Moreno NE, Gutiérrez-Sárraga J, Rey-Portolés G, Jiménez-Huete A, Martínez Álvarez R. Long-Term Outcomes in the Treatment of Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia by Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: A Retrospective Study in Patients With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Neurosurgery 2017; 79:879-888. [PMID: 27560193 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is one of the alternatives for treatment for classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN). OBJECTIVE To retrospectively analyze long-term outcomes for TN using GKRS achieved at our institution. METHODS One hundred seventeen patients with medically refractory TN treated by GKRS at our institution were followed up between 1993 and 2011. Mean maximum dose was 86.5 Gy (range: 80-90 Gy; median: 90 Gy). Clinical response was defined based on the Burchiel classification. We considered classes I and II as a complete response. For toxicity, we use the Barrow Neurological Institute facial numbness scale. Mean duration of follow-up was 66 months (range: 24-171 months). RESULTS Complete response at last follow-up in our patients was 81%, with an excellent response while off medication in 52%. Pain-free rates without medication (class I) were 85% at 3 years (confidence interval [CI]: 78%-94%), 81% at 5 years (CI: 72%-91%), and 76% at 7 years (CI: 65%-90%). Complete response rates (classes I-II) were 91% at 3 years (CI: 86%-97%), 86% at 5 years (CI: 79%-93%), and 82% at 7 years (CI: 72%-93%). Poor treatment response rates differed significantly between patients who had undergone previous surgery and were refractory to management with medication prior to GKRS. New or worsening facial numbness was reported in 32.5% (30% score II and 2.5% score III). No anesthesia dolorosa was reported. Permanent recurrence pain rate was 12%. CONCLUSION GKRS achieved favorable outcomes compared with surgery in terms of pain relief and complication rates in our cohort of patients, notwithstanding decreasing pain-free survival rates over time. We consider GKRS to be an initial treatment in the management of medically intractable TN in selected patients. ABBREVIATIONS CI, confidence intervalGKRS, gamma knife radiosurgeryMVD, microvascular decompressionRS, radiosurgeryTN, trigeminal neuralgia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria E Martínez Moreno
- *Department of Functional Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, and ‡Department of Neurology, Ruber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spina A, Mortini P, Alemanno F, Houdayer E, Iannaccone S. Trigeminal Neuralgia: Toward a Multimodal Approach. World Neurosurg 2017; 103:220-230. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
16
|
Mousavi SH, Akpinar B, Niranjan A, Agarwal V, Cohen J, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD. The clinical significance of persistent trigeminal nerve contrast enhancement in patients who undergo repeat radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2017; 127:219-225. [PMID: 27471888 DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.jns16111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Contrast enhancement of the retrogasserian trigeminal nerve on MRI scans frequently develops after radiosurgical ablation for the management of medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The authors sought to evaluate the clinical significance of this imaging finding in patients who underwent a second radiosurgical procedure for recurrent TN. METHODS During a 22-year period, 360 patients underwent Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as their first surgical procedure for TN at the authors' center. The authors retrospectively analyzed the data from 59 patients (mean age 72 years, range 33-89 years) who underwent repeat SRS for recurrent pain at a median of 30 months (range 6-146 months) after the first SRS. The isocenter was 4 mm, and the median maximum doses for the first and second procedures were 80 Gy and 70 Gy, respectively. A neuroradiologist and a neurosurgeon blinded to the treated side evaluated the presence of nerve contrast enhancement on MRI series at the time of the repeat procedure. The authors correlated the presence of this imaging change with clinical outcomes. Pain outcomes and development of trigeminal sensory dysfunction were evaluated with the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Pain Scale and BNI Numbness Scale, respectively. The mean length of follow-up after the second SRS was 58 months (95% CI 49-68 months). RESULTS At the time of the repeat SRS, contrast enhancement of the trigeminal nerve on MRI scans was observed in 31 patients (53%). Five years after the SRS, patients with this enhancement had lower actuarial rates of complete pain relief after the repeat SRS (27% [95% CI 7%-47%]) than patients without the enhancement (76% [95% CI 58%-94%]) (p < 0.001). At the 5-year follow-up, patients with the contrast enhancement also had a higher risk for trigeminal sensory loss after repeat SRS (75% [95% CI 59%-91%]) than patients without contrast enhancement (26% [95% CI 10%-42%]) (p = 0.001). Dysesthetic pain after repeat SRS was observed for 8 patients with and for 2 patients without contrast enhancement. CONCLUSIONS Trigeminal nerve contrast enhancement on MRI scans observed at the time of a repeat SRS for TN was associated with less satisfactory pain control and more frequently detected facial sensory loss. Residual contrast enhancement at the time of a repeat SRS may warrant consideration of dose reduction or further separation of the radiosurgical targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Berkcan Akpinar
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | | | | | - Jonathan Cohen
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | | | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Departments of 1 Neurological Surgery
- Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Taich ZJ, Goetsch SJ, Monaco E, Carter BS, Ott K, Alksne JF, Chen CC. Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors. World Neurosurg 2016; 90:604-612.e11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2016] [Revised: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 02/12/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
18
|
Park SC, Kwon DH, Lee DH, Lee JK. Repeat Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery for Refractory or Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia with Consideration About the Optimal Second Dose. World Neurosurg 2016; 86:371-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2015] [Revised: 08/15/2015] [Accepted: 08/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
19
|
Helis CA, Lucas JT, Bourland JD, Chan MD, Tatter SB, Laxton AW. Repeat Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia. Neurosurgery 2015; 77:755-61; discussion 761. [PMID: 26214319 PMCID: PMC11177231 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repeat Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an established option for patients whose pain has recurred after the initial procedure, with reported success rates varying from 68% to 95%. Predictive factors for response to the repeat GKRS are ill-defined. OBJECTIVE This cohort study aimed to report the outcomes and factors predictive of success for patients who have undergone repeated GKRS for trigeminal neuralgia at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center. METHODS Between 1999 and 2013, 152 patients underwent repeat GKRS at Wake Forest, 125 of whom were available for long-term follow-up. A retrospective chart review and telephone interviews were conducted to determine background medical history, dosimetric data, outcomes, and adverse effects of the procedure. RESULTS Eighty-four percent of patients achieved at least Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) IIIb pain relief, with 46% achieving BNI I. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of BNI I pain relief were 63%, 50%, and 37%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of BNI IIIb or better pain relief were 74%, 59%, and 46%, respectively. One patient experienced bothersome numbness and 2 patients developed anesthesia dolorosa. The dominant predictive factors for pain relief were facial numbness after the first GKRS and a positive pain response to the first GKRS. CONCLUSION Repeat GKRS is an effective method of treating recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. Patients who have facial numbness after the first treatment and a positive pain response to the first GKRS are significantly more likely to respond well to the second treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corbin A. Helis
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - John T. Lucas
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - J. Daniel Bourland
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Michael D. Chan
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Stephen B. Tatter
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Adrian W. Laxton
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Daugherty E, Bhavsar S, Hahn SS, Bassano D, Hall W. A successful case of multiple stereotactic radiosurgeries for ipsilateral recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2015; 122:1324-9. [PMID: 25816083 DOI: 10.3171/2014.9.jns13959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Trigeminal neuralgia is a common pain syndrome primarily managed medically, although many patients require surgical or radiotherapeutic intervention. Stereotactic radiosurgery has become a preferred method of treatment given its high efficacy rates and relatively favorable toxicity profile. However, many patients have refractory pain even after repeat courses of stereotactic radiosurgery. Historically, 2 courses have been the limit in such patients. The authors present a case of multiply recurrent trigeminal neuralgia treated with a third course of radiosurgery in which the patient had successful pain control and no additional toxicity. Meticulous attention to the therapeutic technique allows the continued application of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shripal Bhavsar
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Integris Cancer Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | | | | | - Walter Hall
- 3Neurosurgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York; and
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tempel ZJ, Chivukula S, Monaco EA, Bowden G, Kano H, Niranjan A, Chang EF, Sneed PK, Kaufmann AM, Sheehan J, Mathieu D, Lunsford LD. The results of a third Gamma Knife procedure for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2015; 122:169-79. [DOI: 10.3171/2014.9.jns132779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT
Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is the least invasive treatment option for medically refractory, intractable trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and is especially valuable for treating elderly, infirm patients or those on anticoagulation therapy. The authors reviewed pain outcomes and complications in TN patients who required 3 radiosurgical procedures for recurrent or persistent pain.
METHODS
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent 3 GKRS procedures for TN at 4 participating centers of the North American Gamma Knife Consortium from 1995 to 2012 was performed. The Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain score was used to evaluate pain outcomes.
RESULTS
Seventeen patients were identified; 7 were male and 10 were female. The mean age at the time of last GKRS was 79.6 years (range 51.2–95.6 years). The TN was Type I in 16 patients and Type II in 1 patient. No patient suffered from multiple sclerosis. Eight patients (47.1%) reported initial complete pain relief (BNI Score I) following their third GKRS and 8 others (47.1%) experienced at least partial relief (BNI Scores II–IIIb). The average time to initial response was 2.9 months following the third GKRS. Although 3 patients (17.6%) developed new facial sensory dysfunction following primary GKRS and 2 patients (11.8%) experienced new or worsening sensory disturbance following the second GKRS, no patient sustained additional sensory disturbances after the third procedure. At a mean follow-up of 22.9 months following the third GKRS, 6 patients (35.3%) reported continued Score I complete pain relief, while 7 others (41.2%) reported pain improvement (BNI Scores II–IIIb). Four patients (23.5%) suffered recurrent TN following the third procedure at a mean interval of 19.1 months.
CONCLUSIONS
A third GKRS resulted in pain reduction with a low risk of additional complications in most patients with medically refractory and recurrent, intractable TN. In patients unsuitable for other microsurgical or percutaneous strategies, especially those receiving long-term oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents, GKRS repeated for a third time was a satisfactory, low risk option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary J. Tempel
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| | | | - Edward A. Monaco
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| | - Greg Bowden
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| | | | - Penny K. Sneed
- 4Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Anthony M. Kaufmann
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Manitoba Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba; and
| | - Jason Sheehan
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - David Mathieu
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - L. Dade Lunsford
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tuleasca C, Carron R, Resseguier N, Donnet A, Roussel P, Gaudart J, Levivier M, Régis J. Repeat Gamma Knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and systematic review. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 Suppl:210-21. [DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.gks141487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
ObjectThe purpose of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of repeat Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia (TN).MethodsUsing the prospective database of TN patients treated with GKS in Timone University Hospital (Marseille, France), data were analyzed for 737 patients undergoing GKS for TN Type 1 from July 1992 to November 2010. Among the 497 patients with initial pain cessation, 34.4% (157/456 with ≥ 1-year follow-up) experienced at least 1 recurrence. Thirteen patients (1.8%) were considered for a second GKS, proposed only if the patients had good and prolonged initial pain cessation after the first GKS, with no other treatment alternative at the moment of recurrence. As for the first GKS, a single 4-mm isocenter was positioned in the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve at a median distance of 7.6 mm (range 4–14 mm) anterior to the emergence of the nerve (retrogasserian target). A median maximum dose of 90 Gy (range 70–90 Gy) was delivered. Data for 9 patients with at least 1-year followup were analyzed. A systematic review of literature was also performed, and results are compared with those of the Marseille study.ResultsThe median time to retreatment in the Marseille study was 72 months (range 12–125 months) and in the literature it was 17 months (range 3–146 months). In the Marseille study, the median follow-up period was 33.9 months (range 12–96 months), and 8 of 9 patients (88.9%) had initial pain cessation with a median of 6.5 days (range 1–180 days). The actuarial rate for new hypesthesia was 33.3% at 6 months and 50% at 1 year, which remained stable for 7 years. The actuarial probabilities of maintaining pain relief without medication at 6 months and 1 year were 100% and 75%, respectively, and remained stable for 7 years. The systematic review analyzed 20 peer-reviewed studies reporting outcomes for repeat GKS for recurrent TN, with a total of 626 patients. Both the selection of the cases for retreatment and the way of reporting outcomes vary widely among studies, with a median rate for initial pain cessation of 88% (range 60%–100%) and for new hypesthesia of 33% (range 11%–80%).ConclusionsResults from the Marseille study raise the question of surgical alternatives after failed GKS for TN. The rates of initial pain cessation and recurrence seem comparable to, or even better than, those of the first GKS, according to different studies, but toxicity is much higher, both in the Marseille study and in the published data. Neither the Marseille study data nor literature data answer the 3 cardinal questions regarding repeat radiosurgery in recurrent TN: which patients to retreat, which target is optimal, and which dose to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Tuleasca
- 1INSERM U 751 (Université de la Méditerranée), Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery Unit
- 4Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS 5), École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
- 5Medical Image Analysis Laboratory
- 6Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois; and
- 7Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Romain Carron
- 1INSERM U 751 (Université de la Méditerranée), Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery Unit
| | - Noémie Resseguier
- 2Department of Public Health and Medical Information and UMR 912 (INSERM-IRD–Université de laMéditerranée); and
| | - Anne Donnet
- 3Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Federation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Timone Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Roussel
- 1INSERM U 751 (Université de la Méditerranée), Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery Unit
| | - Jean Gaudart
- 2Department of Public Health and Medical Information and UMR 912 (INSERM-IRD–Université de laMéditerranée); and
| | - Marc Levivier
- 6Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois; and
- 7Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Régis
- 1INSERM U 751 (Université de la Méditerranée), Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery Unit
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Baschnagel AM, Cartier JL, Dreyer J, Chen PY, Pieper DR, Olson RE, Krauss DJ, Maitz AH, Grills IS. Trigeminal neuralgia pain relief after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 117:107-111. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2013] [Revised: 12/05/2013] [Accepted: 12/08/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
24
|
Chan MD, Shaw EG, Tatter SB. Radiosurgical Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013; 24:613-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2013.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
25
|
Latorzeff I, Debono B, Sol JC, Ménégalli D, Mertens P, Redon A, Muracciole X. Traitement de la névralgie essentielle du trijumeau par radiochirurgie stéréotaxique. Cancer Radiother 2012; 16 Suppl:S57-69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2012.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2011] [Accepted: 01/23/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
26
|
Park KJ, Kondziolka D, Berkowitz O, Kano H, Novotny J, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Repeat gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 2012; 70:295-305; discussion 305. [PMID: 21811188 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0b013e318230218e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) may recur after treatment by gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSR). OBJECTIVE To evaluate management outcomes in patients who underwent repeat GKSR for TN. METHODS The authors reviewed their experience with repeat GKSR in 119 patients with recurrent TN. The median patient age was 74 years (range, 34-96 years). The median interval between procedures was 26 months. The median target dose for repeat GKSR was 70 Gy (range, 50-90 Gy) and the median cumulative dose was 145 Gy (range, 120-170 Gy). The median follow-up was 48 months (range, 6-187 months) after repeat GKSR. RESULTS After repeat GKSR, 87% of patients achieved initial pain relief (Barrow Neurological Institute pain score I-IIIb). Pain relief was maintained in 87.8% at 1 year, 69.8% at 3 years, and 44.2% at 5 years. Facial sensory dysfunction occurred in 21% of patients within 18 months after GKSR. Longer pain relief was observed in patients who had recurrent pain in a reduced pain distribution of the face compared with the pain distribution at the time of their initial GKSR, and in those who developed additional trigeminal sensory loss after a repeat procedure. A cumulative edge of brainstem dose ≥ 44 Gy was more likely to be associated with the development of sensory loss. CONCLUSION Repeat GKSR provides a similar rate of pain relief as the first procedure. The best responses were observed in patients who had good pain control after the first procedure and those who developed new sensory dysfunction in the affected trigeminal distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung-Jae Park
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yen CP, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP. Gamma Knife® radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Expert Rev Med Devices 2012; 8:709-21. [PMID: 22029468 DOI: 10.1586/erd.11.46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Trigeminal neuralgia is characterized by a temporary paroxysmal lancinating facial pain in the trigeminal nerve distribution. The prevalence is four to five per 100,000. Local pressure on nerve fibers from vascular loops results in painful afferent discharge from an injured segment of the fifth cranial nerve. Microvascular decompression addresses the underlying pathophysiology of the disease, making this treatment the gold standard for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. In patients who cannot tolerate a surgical procedure, those in whom a vascular etiology cannot be identified, or those unwilling to undergo an open surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery is an appropriate alternative. The majority of patients with typical facial pain will achieve relief following radiosurgical treatment. Long-term follow-up for recurrence as well as for radiation-induced complications is required in all patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Po Yen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Aubuchon AC, Chan MD, Lovato JF, Balamucki CJ, Ellis TL, Tatter SB, McMullen KP, Munley MT, Deguzman AF, Ekstrand KE, Bourland JD, Shaw EG. Repeat gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:1059-65. [PMID: 20932665 PMCID: PMC3852433 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2010] [Revised: 07/05/2010] [Accepted: 08/06/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Repeat gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKRS) for recurrent or persistent trigeminal neuralgia induces an additional response but at the expense of an increased incidence of facial numbness. The present series summarized the results of a repeat treatment series at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, including a multivariate analysis of the data to identify the prognostic factors for treatment success and toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 1999 and December 2007, 37 patients underwent a second GKRS application because of treatment failure after a first GKRS treatment. The mean initial dose in the series was 87.3 Gy (range, 80-90). The mean retreatment dose was 84.4 Gy (range, 60-90). The dosimetric variables recorded included the dorsal root entry zone dose, pons surface dose, and dose to the distal nerve. RESULTS Of the 37 patients, 81% achieved a >50% pain relief response to repeat GKRS, and 57% experienced some form of trigeminal dysfunction after repeat GKRS. Two patients (5%) experienced clinically significant toxicity: one with bothersome numbness and one with corneal dryness requiring tarsorraphy. A dorsal root entry zone dose at repeat treatment of >26.6 Gy predicted for treatment success (61% vs. 32%, p = .0716). A cumulative dorsal root entry zone dose of >84.3 Gy (72% vs. 44%, p = .091) and a cumulative pons surface dose of >108.5 Gy (78% vs. 44%, p = .018) predicted for post-GKRS numbness. The presence of any post-GKRS numbness predicted for a >50% decrease in pain intensity (100% vs. 60%, p = .0015). CONCLUSION Repeat GKRS is a viable treatment option for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia, although the patient assumes a greater risk of nerve dysfunction to achieve maximal pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C Aubuchon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Feasibility of multiple repeat gamma knife radiosurgeries for trigeminal neuralgia: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Med 2011; 2011:258910. [PMID: 21904556 PMCID: PMC3166780 DOI: 10.1155/2011/258910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2011] [Revised: 06/09/2011] [Accepted: 07/04/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment options for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) must be customized for the individual patient, and physicians must be aware of the medical, surgical, and radiation treatment modalities to prescribe optimal treatment courses for specific patients. The following case illustrates the potential for gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) to be repeated multiple times for the purpose of achieving facial pain control in cases of TN that have been refractory to other medical and surgical options, as well as prior GKRS. The patient described failed to achieve pain control with initial GKRS, as well as medical and surgical treatments, but experienced significant pain relief for a period of time with a second GKRS procedure and later underwent a third procedure. Only a small subset of patients have reportedly undergone more than two GKRS for TN; thus, further research and long-term clinical followup will be valuable in determining its usefulness in specific clinical situations.
Collapse
|
30
|
Sekula RF, Frederickson AM, Jannetta PJ, Quigley MR, Aziz KM, Arnone GD. Microvascular decompression for elderly patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective study and systematic review with meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2011; 114:172-9. [PMID: 20653393 DOI: 10.3171/2010.6.jns10142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Because the incidence of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) increases with age, neurosurgeons frequently encounter elderly patients with this disorder. Although microvascular decompression (MVD) is the only etiological therapy for TN with the highest initial efficacy and durability of all treatments, it is nonetheless associated with special risks (cerebellar hematoma, cranial nerve injury, stroke, and death) not seen with the commonly performed ablative procedures. Thus, the safety of MVD in the elderly remains a concern. This prospective study and systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether MVD is a safe and effective treatment in elderly patients with TN. METHODS In this prospectively conducted analysis, 36 elderly patients (mean age 73.0 ± 5.9 years) and 53 nonelderly patients (mean age 52.9 ± 8.8 years) underwent MVD over the study period. Outcome and complication data were recorded. The authors also conducted a systematic review of the English literature published before December 2009 and providing outcomes and complications of MVD in patients with TN above the age of 60 years. Pooled complication rates of stroke, death, cerebellar hematoma, and permanent cranial nerve deficits were analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-one elderly patients (86.1%) reported an excellent outcome after MVD (mean follow-up 20.0 ± 7.0 months). Twenty-five elderly patients with Type 1 TN were compared with 26 nonelderly patients with Type 1 TN, and no significant difference in outcomes was found (p = 0.046). Three elderly patients with Type 2a TN were compared with 12 nonelderly patients with Type 2a TN, and no significant difference in outcomes was noted (p = 1.0). Eight elderly patients with Type 2b TN were compared with 15 nonelderly patients with Type 2b TN, and no significant difference in outcomes was noted (p = 0.086). The median length of stay between cohorts was compared, and no significant difference was noted (2 days for each cohort, p = 0.33). There were no CSF leaks, no cerebellar hematomas, no strokes, and no deaths. Eight studies (1334 patients) met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. For none of the complications was the incidence significantly more frequent in elderly patients than in the nonelderly. CONCLUSIONS Although patient selection remains important, the authors' experience and the results of this systematic review with meta-analysis suggest that the majority of elderly patients with TN can safely undergo MVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond F Sekula
- Center for Cranial Nerve Disorders, Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Neuroscience Institute/Drexel University College of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sekula RF, Frederickson AM, Jannetta PJ, Bhatia S, Quigley MR. Microvascular decompression after failed Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a safe and effective rescue therapy? J Neurosurg 2010; 113:45-52. [DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.jns091386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object
Stereotactic radiosurgical rhizolysis using Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) is an increasingly popular treatment for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Because of the increasing use of GKS for trigeminal neuralgia, clinicians are faced with the problem of choosing a subsequent treatment plan if GKS fails. This study was conducted to identify whether microvascular decompression (MVD) is a safe and effective treatment for patients who experience trigeminal neuralgia symptoms after GKS.
Methods
From their records, the authors identified 29 consecutive patients who, over a 2-year period, underwent MVD following failed GKS. During MVD, data regarding thickened arachnoid, adhesions between vessels and the trigeminal nerve, and trigeminal nerve atrophy/discoloration were noted. Outcome and complication data were also recorded.
Results
The MVD procedure was completed in 28 patients (97%). Trigeminal nerve atrophy was noted in 14 patients (48%). A thickened arachnoid was noted in 1 patient (3%). Adhesions between vessels and the trigeminal nerve were noted in 6 patients (21%) and prevented MVD in 1 patient. At last follow-up, 15 patients (54%) reported an excellent outcome after MVD, 1 (4%) reported a good outcome, 2 (7%) reported a fair outcome, and 10 patients (36%) reported a poor outcome. After MVD, new or worsened facial numbness occurred in 6 patients (21%). Additionally, 3 patients (11%) developed new or worsened troubling dysesthesias.
Conclusions
Thickened arachnoid, adhesions between vessels and the trigeminal nerve, and trigeminal nerve atrophy/discoloration due to GKS did not prevent completion of MVD. An MVD is an appropriate and safe “rescue” therapy following GKS, although the risks of numbness and troubling dysesthesias appear to be higher than with MVD alone.
Collapse
|
32
|
Franzini A, Ferroli P, Messina G, Broggi G. Surgical treatment of cranial neuralgias. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2010; 97:679-692. [PMID: 20816463 DOI: 10.1016/s0072-9752(10)97057-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The most common types of cranial neuralgias amenable to surgical therapeutic options are trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia, the former having an approximate incidence of 5/100000 cases per year and the latter of 0.05/100000 cases per year. Surgical therapy of these pathological conditions encompasses several strategies, going from ablative procedures to neurovascular decompression, to radiosurgery. The choice of the most appropriate surgical option (which must be taken into account when all conservative treatments have proven to be unsuccessful) has to take into account many factors, the most important ones being neuroradiological evidence of a neurovascular conflict, severity of symptoms, the age and clinical history of the patient, and the patient's overall medical condition. In this chapter we report our experience with the treatment of trigeminal and glossopharyngeal neuralgia, describing the surgical procedures performed and reviewing the most recent aspects on this subject in the past literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Neurologico “Carlo Besta”, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dvorak T, Finn A, Price LL, Mignano JE, Fitzek MM, Wu JK, Yao KC. Retreatment of trigeminal neuralgia with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: is there an appropriate cumulative dose? J Neurosurg 2009; 111:359-64. [DOI: 10.3171/2008.11.jns08770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a disorder of the trigeminal nerve that results in intense episodic pain. Primary treatment with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) is well established; however, a significant number of patients experience recurrence of TN over time. Repeat GKS can be performed, but the retreatment dose has not been well established. In this study, the authors present their institutional retreatment results and compare them with other series.
Methods
Between December 2003 and January 2006, 28 patients were treated at Tufts Medical Center with repeat GKS for recurrence of TN. All patients had been initially treated with GKS at this institution, and only those with significant pain improvement were offered retreatment. The maximum dose was prescribed using a single isocenter; the 4-mm collimator was used. The initial median GKS dose was 80 Gy, the median retreatment dose was 45 Gy, and the median cumulative dose was 125 Gy. The median time between GKS procedures was 18.1 months. Facial pain outcomes were defined using the Marseille scale. Excellent outcome was defined as no pain (with or without medications), and good outcome was defined as > 50% pain relief. Toxicity was categorized as none, mild, or bothersome. The median clinical follow-up after the second GKS was 19.7 months. Our clinical outcomes were compared with 8 previously reported retreatment series (including 1 abstract), both for rate of pain control and for rate of complications.
Results
Outcomes after the second GKS were excellent in 29% (8 patients), good in 32% (9), and poor in 39% (11). Four patients (14%) experienced no improvement after repeat GKS. Eight patients (29%) experienced new trigeminal nerve dysfunction, including numbness (11%), paresthesia (14%), dysesthesia (4%), taste alteration (11%), and bite weakness (4%). None of these were bothersome. No patient developed corneal numbness. Univariate analysis failed to reveal any significant predictors of pain control or complications.
Seven published peer-reviewed retreatment series and the authors' data (total 215 patients) were analyzed. There was a cumulative dose-response relationship for both pain control (p = 0.04) and new trigeminal dysfunction (p = 0.08). Successful pain control was strongly correlated with development of new dysfunction (p = 0.02). A cumulative dose > 130 Gy was more likely to result in successful (> 50%) pain control, but was also more likely (> 20%) to result in development of new dysfunction.
Conclusions
Successful retreatment of patients in whom the initial GKS treatment fails is feasible. Patients who respond initially may be at a higher risk of retreatment-related complications. There appears to be a dose-response relationship for both pain control and development of new side effects. It is important to counsel and treat patients individually based on this dose-response relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lori Lyn Price
- 2The Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, and
| | | | | | - Julian K. Wu
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kevin C. Yao
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Little AS, Shetter AG, Shetter ME, Kakarla UK, Rogers CL. Salvage Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Surgically Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74:522-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2008] [Revised: 08/02/2008] [Accepted: 08/20/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
35
|
Vesper J, Bölke B, Wille C, Gerber PA, Matuschek C, Peiper M, Steiger HJ, Budach W, Lammering G. Current concepts in stereotactic radiosurgery - a neurosurgical and radiooncological point of view. Eur J Med Res 2009; 14:93-101. [PMID: 19380278 PMCID: PMC3352064 DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-3-93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery is related to the history of "radiotherapy" and "stereotactic neurosurgery". The concepts for neurosurgeons and radiooncologists have been changed during the last decade and have also transformed neurosurgery. The gamma knife and the stereotactically modified linear accelerator (LINAC) are radiosurgical equipments to treat predetermined intracranial targets through the intact skull without damaging the surrounding normal brain tissue. These technical developments allow a more precise intracranial lesion control and offer even more conformal dose plans for irregularly shaped lesions. Histological determination by stereotactic biopsy remains the basis for any otherwise undefined intracranial lesion. As a minimal approach, it allows functional preservation, low risk and high sensitivity. Long-term results have been published for various indications. The impact of radiosurgery is presented for the management of gliomas, metastases, brain stem lesions, benign tumours and vascular malformations and selected functional disorders such as trigeminal neuralgia. In AVM's it can be performed as part of a multimodality strategy including resection or endovascular embolisation. Finally, the technological advances in radiation oncology as well as stereotactic neurosurgery have led to significant improvements in radiosurgical treatment opportunities. Novel indications are currently under investigation. The combination of both, the neurosurgical and the radiooncological expertise, will help to minimize the risk for the patient while achieving a greater treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Vesper
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Little AS, Shetter AG, Shetter ME, Bay C, Rogers CL. Long-term pain response and quality of life in patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 2008; 63:915-23; discussion 923-4. [PMID: 19005382 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000327689.05823.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The long-term outcome of patients treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for typical trigeminal neuralgia has not been fully studied. We evaluated 185 patients who underwent their first GKRS treatment between 1997 and 2003 at the Barrow Neurological Institute. METHODS Follow-up was obtained by surveys and review of medical records. Outcomes were assessed by the Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score and Brief Pain Inventory. The most common maximum dose was 80 Gy targeted at the root entry zone. Outcomes are presented for the 136 (74%) patients for whom more than 4 years of clinical follow-up data were obtained. RESULTS Treatment failed in 33% of the cohort within 2 years, but only an additional 1% relapsed after 4 years. Actuarial analysis demonstrated that 32% of patients were pain-free off medication and 63% had at least a good outcome at 7 years. When GKRS was used as the primary treatment, 45% of the patients were pain-free at 7 years. In contrast, 10% of patients in whom previous treatment had failed were pain-free. When needed, salvage therapy with repeat GKRS, microvascular decompression, or percutaneous lesioning was successful in 70%. Posttreatment facial numbness was reported as very bothersome in 5%, most commonly in patients who underwent another invasive treatment. After GKRS, 73% reported that trigeminal neuralgia had no impact on their quality of life. CONCLUSION GKRS is a reasonable long-term treatment option for patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia. It yields durable pain control in a majority of patients, as well as improved quality of life with limited complications and it does not significantly affect the efficacy of other surgical treatments, should they be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Little
- Division of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Guo S, Chao ST, Reuther AM, Barnett GH, Suh JH. Review of the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2008; 86:135-46. [DOI: 10.1159/000120425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
38
|
Li X, Zhang P, Brisman R, Kutcher G. Use of simulated annealing for optimization of alignment parameters in limited MRI acquisition volumes of the brain. Med Phys 2005; 32:2363-2370. [PMID: 16121594 DOI: 10.1118/1.1944287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2004] [Revised: 04/08/2005] [Accepted: 05/06/2005] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies suggest that clinical outcomes are improved in repeat trigeminal neuralgia (TN) Gamma Knife radiosurgery if a different part of the nerve from the previous radiosurgery is treated. The MR images taken in the first and repeat radiosurgery need to be coregistered to map the first radiosurgery volume onto the second treatment planning image. We propose a fully automatic and robust three-dimensional (3-D) mutual information- (MI-) based registration method engineered by a simulated annealing (SA) optimization technique. Commonly, Powell's method and Downhill simplex (DS) method are most popular in optimizing the MI objective function in medical image registration applications. However, due to the nonconvex property of the MI function, robustness of those two methods is questionable, especially for our cases, where only 28 slices of MR T1 images were utilized. Our SA method obtained successful registration results for all the 41 patients recruited in this study. On the other hand, Powell's method and the DS method failed to provide satisfactory registration for 11 patients and 9 patients, respectively. The overlapping volume ratio (OVR) is defined to quantify the degree of the partial volume overlap between the first and second MR scan. Statistical results from a logistic regression procedure demonstrated that the probability of a success of Powell's method tends to decrease as OVR decreases. The rigid registration with Powell's or the DS method is not suitable for the TN radiosurgery application, where OVR is likely to be low. In summary, our experimental results demonstrated that the MI-based registration method with the SA optimization technique is a robust and reliable option when the number of slices in the imaging study is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sanchez-Mejia RO, Limbo M, Cheng JS, Camara J, Ward MM, Barbaro NM. Recurrent or refractory trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression, radiofrequency ablation, or radiosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18:e12. [PMID: 16419977 DOI: 10.3171/foc.2005.18.5.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is characterized by paroxysmal lancinating pain in the trigeminal nerve distribution. When TN is refractory to medical management, patients are referred for microvascular decompression (MVD), radiofrequency ablation, or radiosurgery. After the initial treatment, patients may have refractory or recurrent symptoms requiring retreatment. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors are associated with the need for retreatment and which modality is most effective.
Methods
To define this population further, the authors evaluated a cohort of patients who required retreatment for TN. The mean follow-up periods were 51 months from the first treatment and 23 months from the last one, and these were comparable among treatment groups.
Conclusions
Trigeminal neuralgia can recur after neurosurgical treatment. In this study the authors demonstrate that the number of patients requiring retreatment is not negligible. Lower retreatment rates were seen in patients who initially underwent radiosurgery, compared with those in whom MVD or radiofrequency ablation were performed. Radiosurgery was more likely to be the final treatment for recurrent TN regardless of the initial treatment. After retreatment, the majority of patients attained complete or very good pain relief. Pain relief after retreatment correlates with postoperative facial numbness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rene O Sanchez-Mejia
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0112, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhang P, Brisman R, Choi J, Li X. Where to locate the isocenter? The treatment strategy for repeat trigeminal neuralgia radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62:38-43. [PMID: 15850900 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2004] [Revised: 09/02/2004] [Accepted: 09/08/2004] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to investigate how the spatial relationship between the isocenters of the first and second radiosurgeries affects the overall outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a retrospective study on 40 patients who had repeat gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Only one 4-mm isocenter was applied in both first and second radiosurgeries, with a maximum radiation dose of 75 Gy and 40 Gy, respectively. The MR scan of the first radiosurgery was registered to that of the second radiosurgery by a landmark-based registration algorithm. The spatial relationship between the isocenter of the first and the second radiosurgeries was thus determined. The investigating parameters were the distance between the isocenters of the two separate radiosurgeries and isocenter proximity to the brainstem. The outcome end points were pain relief and dysesthesias. The median follow-up for the repeat radiosurgery was 28 months (range, 6-51 months). RESULTS Pain relief was complete in 11 patients, nearly complete (> or =90%) in 7 patients, partial (> or =50%) in 8 patients, and minimal (<50%) or none in another 14 patients. The mean distance between the two isocenters was 2.86 mm in the complete or nearly complete pain relief group vs. 1.93 mm in the others. Farther distance between isocenters was associated with a trend toward better pain relief (p = 0.057). The proximity of the second isocenter to the brainstem did not affect pain relief, and neither did placing the second isocenter proximal or distal to the brainstem compared with the first one. Three patients developed moderate dysesthesias (score of 4 on a 0-10 scale), and 2 other patients developed more significant dysesthesias (score of 7) after the second radiosurgery. Dysesthesias related neither to distance between isocenters nor to which isocenter was closer to the brainstem. CONCLUSIONS Image registration between MR scans of the first and second radiosurgeries helps target delineation and radiosurgery treatment planning. Increasing the isocenter distance between the two radiosurgeries treated a longer segment of the trigeminal neuralgia nerve and was associated with a trend toward improved pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengpeng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032-3784, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sheehan J, Pan HC, Stroila M, Steiner L. Gamma knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: outcomes and prognostic factors. J Neurosurg 2005; 102:434-41. [PMID: 15796376 DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.3.0434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object. Microvascular decompression (MVD) and percutaneous ablation surgery have historically been the treatments of choice for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Gamma knife surgery (GKS) has been used as an alternative, minimally invasive treatment in TN. In the present study, the authors evaluated the long-term results of GKS in the treatment of TN.
Methods. From 1996 to 2003, 151 cases of TN were treated with GKS. In this group, radiosurgery was performed once in 136 patients, twice in 14 patients, and three times in one patient. The types of TN were as follows: 122 patients with typical TN, three with atypical TN, four with multiple sclerosis—associated TN, and seven with TN and a history of a cavernous sinus tumor. In each case, the chosen radiosurgical target was located 2 to 4 mm anterior to the entry of the trigeminal nerve into the pons. The maximal radiation doses ranged from 50 to 90 Gy. The median age of the patients was 68 years (range 22–90 years), and the median time from diagnosis to GKS was 72 months (range 1–276 months). The median follow up was 19 months (range 2–96 months). Clinical outcomes and postradiosurgical magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors that correlated with a favorable, pain-free outcome.
The mean time to relief of pain was 24 days (range 1–180 days). Forty-seven, 45, and 34% of patients were pain free without medication at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow ups, respectively. Ninety, 77, and 70% of patients experienced some improvement in pain at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow ups, respectively. Thirty-three (27%) of 122 patients with initial improvement subsequently experienced pain recurrence a median of 12 months (range 2–34 months) post-GKS. Among those whose symptoms recurred, 14 patients underwent additional GKS, six MVD, four glycerol injection, and one patient a percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy. Twelve patients (9%) suffered the onset of new facial numbness post-GKS. Changes on MR images post-GKS were noted in nine patients (7%). On univariate analysis, right-sided neuralgia (p = 0.0002) and a previous neurectomy (p = 0.04) correlated with a pain-free outcome; on multivariate analysis, both right-sided neuralgia (p = 0.032) and patient age (p = 0.05) were statistically significant. New onset of facial numbness following GKS correlated with undergoing more than one GKS (p = 0.002).
Conclusions. At the last follow up, GKS effected pain relief in 44% of patients. Some degree of pain improvement at 3 years post-GKS was noted in 70% of patients with TN. Although less effective than MVD, GKS remains a reasonable treatment option for those unwilling or unable to undergo more invasive surgical approaches and offers a low risk of side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Sheehan
- Lars Leksell Center for Gamma Surgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Urgosik D, Liscak R, Novotny J, Vymazal J, Vladyka V. Treatment of essential trigeminal neuralgia with gamma knife surgery. J Neurosurg 2005. [DOI: 10.3171/sup.2005.102.s_supplement.0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object. The authors present the long-term follow-up results (minimum 5 years) of patients with essential trigeminal neuralgia (TN) who were treated with gamma knife surgery (GKS).
Methods. One hundred seven patients (61 females and 46 males) underwent GKS. The median follow up was time was 60 months (range 12–96 months). The target was the trigeminal root, and the maximum dose was 70 to 80 Gy. Repeated GKS was performed in 19 patients for recurrent pain, and the same dose was used.
Initial successful results were achieved in 96% of patients, with complete pain relief in 80.4%. Relief was achieved after a median latency of 3 months (range 1 day–13 months). Gamma knife surgery failed in 4% of patients. Pain recurred in 25% of patients after a median latent interval of 36 months (6–94 months). The initial success rate after a second GKS was 89% and 58% of patients were pain free. Pain relapse occurred in only one patient in this group. Hypesthesia was observed in 20% of patients after the first GKS and in 32% after the second GKS. The median interval to hypaesthesia was 35 months (range 3–94 months) after one treatment and 21 months (range 1–72 months) after a second treatment.
Conclusions. The initial success rate of pain relief was high and comparable to that reported in other studies. A higher than usual incidence of sensory impairment after GKS could be the long duration of follow-up study and due to the detailed neurological examination.
Collapse
|
43
|
Urgosik D, Liscak R, Novotny J, Vymazal J, Vladyka V. Treatment of essential trigeminal neuralgia with gamma knife surgery. J Neurosurg 2005; 102 Suppl:29-33. [PMID: 15662776 DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.s_supplement.0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object.The authors present the long-term follow-up results (minimum 5 years) of patients with essential trigeminal neuralgia (TN) who were treated with gamma knife surgery (GKS).Methods.One hundred seven patients (61 females and 46 males) underwent GKS. The median follow up was time was 60 months (range 12–96 months). The target was the trigeminal root, and the maximum dose was 70 to 80 Gy. Repeated GKS was performed in 19 patients for recurrent pain, and the same dose was used.Initial successful results were achieved in 96% of patients, with complete pain relief in 80.4%. Relief was achieved after a median latency of 3 months (range 1 day–13 months). Gamma knife surgery failed in 4% of patients. Pain recurred in 25% of patients after a median latent interval of 36 months (6–94 months). The initial success rate after a second GKS was 89% and 58% of patients were pain free. Pain relapse occurred in only one patient in this group. Hypesthesia was observed in 20% of patients after the first GKS and in 32% after the second GKS. The median interval to hypaesthesia was 35 months (range 3–94 months) after one treatment and 21 months (range 1–72 months) after a second treatment.Conclusions.The initial success rate of pain relief was high and comparable to that reported in other studies. A higher than usual incidence of sensory impairment after GKS could be the long duration of follow-up study and due to the detailed neurological examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dusan Urgosik
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Medical Physics, and Radiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|