Mismatch repair proficiency is not required for radioenhancement by gemcitabine

Drug metabolism and homologous recombination repair in radiosensitization with gemcitabine

Gemcitabine (difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdCyd) is a potent radiosensitizer, noted for its ability to enhance cytotoxicity with radiation at noncytotoxic concentrations in vitro and subchemotherapeutic doses in patients. Radiosensitization in human tumor cells requires dFdCyd-mediated accumulation of cells in S phase with inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase, resulting in ≥80% deoxyadenosine triphosphate (dATP) depletion and errors of replication in DNA. Less is known of the role of specific DNA replication and repair pathways in the radiosensitization mechanism. Here the role of homologous recombination (HR) in relationship to the metabolic and cell cycle effects of dFdCyd was investigated using a matched pair of CHO cell lines that are either proficient (AA8 cells) or deficient (irs1SF cells) in HR based on expression of the HR protein XRCC3. The results demonstrated that the characteristics of radiosensitization in the rodent AA8 cells differed significantly from those in human tumor cells. In the AA8 cells, radiosensitization was achieved only under short (≤4 h) cytotoxic incubations, and S-phase accumulation did not appear to be required for radiosensitization. In contrast, human tumor cell lines were radiosensitized using noncytotoxic concentrations of dFdCyd and required early S-phase accumulation. Studies of the metabolic effects of dFdCyd demonstrated low dFdCyd concentrations did not deplete dATP by ≥80% in AA8 and irs1SF cells. However, at higher concentrations of dFdCyd, failure to radiosensitize the HR-deficient irs1SF cells could not be explained by a lack of dATP depletion or lack of S-phase accumulation. Thus, these parameters did not correspond to dFdCyd radiosensitization in the CHO cells. To evaluate directly the role of HR in radiosensitization, XRCC3 expression was suppressed in the AA8 cells with a lentiviral-delivered shRNA. Partial XRCC3 suppression significantly decreased radiosensitization [radiation enhancement ratio (RER) = 1.6 ± 0.15], compared to nontransduced (RER = 2.7 ± 0.27; P = 0.012), and a substantial decrease compared to nonspecific shRNA-transduced (RER = 2.5 ± 0.42; P = 0.056) AA8 cells. Although the results support a role for HR in radiosensitization with dFdCyd in CHO cells, the differences in the underlying metabolic and cell cycle characteristics suggest that dFdCyd radiosensitization in the nontumor-derived CHO cells is mechanistically distinct from that in human tumor cells.

In vitro study on the schedule-dependency of the interaction between pemetrexed, gemcitabine and irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer cells

Background

Based on their different mechanisms of action, non-overlapping side effects and radiosensitising potential, combining the antimetabolites pemetrexed (multitargeted antifolate, MTA) and gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC) with irradiation (RT) seems promising. This in vitro study, for the first time, presents the triple combination of MTA, dFdC and irradiation using various treatment schedules.

Methods

The cytotoxicity, radiosensitising potential and cell cycle effect of MTA were investigated in A549 (NSCLC) and CAL-27 (SCCHN) cells. Using simultaneous or sequential exposure schedules, the cytotoxicity and radiosensitising effect of 24 h MTA combined with 1 h or 24 h dFdC were analysed.

Results

Including a time interval between MTA exposure and irradiation seemed favourable to MTA immediately preceding or following radiotherapy. MTA induced a significant S phase accumulation that persisted for more than 8 h after drug removal. Among different MTA/dFdC combinations tested, the highest synergistic interaction was produced by 24 h MTA followed by 1 h dFdC. Combined with irradiation, this schedule showed a clear radiosensitising effect.

Conclusions

Results from our in vitro model suggest that the sequence 24 h MTA → 1 h dFdC → RT is the most rational design and would, after confirmation in an in vivo setting, possibly provide the greatest benefit in the clinic.

S-phase cell-specific modification by gemcitabine of PFGE-analyzed radiation-induced DNA fragmentation and rejoining

PURPOSE

To assess the cell cycle-dependent influence of gemcitabine on ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breakage (DSB) and rejoining measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

WIDR cells (human colon carcinoma) were synchronized by serum starvation/stimulation providing populations with 7% (G1) or 50% S-phase cells, respectively. Following drug treatment (0.5 microg/ml for 2 hours) cells were irradiated (up to 90 Gy) or incubated for repair (up to 6 h after 40 Gy). Cell cycle changes were monitored by flow cytometry, DNA fragmentation was assessed by PFGE as fraction of electrophoretically mobile DNA.

RESULTS

Without drug treatment, irradiated S-phase cells exhibited lower PFGE signals than the G1 cells due to the well known electrophoretic immobility of replicative DNA fragments, but DSB rejoining was not different. Gemcitabine pretreatment increased the apparent initial radiation-induced DNA fragmentation specifically for S-phase cells. This effect was rapidly reversed (1 h) during incubation for repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate that gemcitabine causes the formation of additional radiation-induced DSB in S-phase cells or destabilizes the replicative structures that otherwise prevent DNA fragment migration during PFGE. The latter would be rapidly restituted superimposing DSB rejoining. This is discussed in relation to the recently proposed role of mismatch repair in gemcitabine radiosensitization.

Improving gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization using molecularly targeted therapy: a review

In the last three decades, gemcitabine has progressed from the status of a laboratory cytotoxic drug to a standard clinical chemotherapeutic agent and a potent radiation sensitizer. In an effort to improve the efficacy of gemcitabine, additional chemotherapeutic agents have been combined with gemcitabine (both with and without radiation) but with toxicity proving to be a major limitation. Therefore, the integration of molecularly targeted agents, which potentially produce less toxicity than standard chemotherapy, with gemcitabine radiation is a promising strategy for improving chemoradiation. Two of the most promising targets, described in this review, for improving the efficacy of gemcitabine radiation are epidermal growth factor receptor and checkpoint kinase 1.

Antimetabolite radiosensitizers

Radiosensitization with antimetabolites has improved clinical outcome for patients with solid malignancies, especially cancers of the GI tract, cervix, and head and neck. Fluorouracil (FU) and hydroxyurea have been widely used clinically during the last four decades, and promising results have been observed more recently with gemcitabine. Although the antimetabolites all target DNA replication, they differ with respect to the mechanisms by which they produce radiosensitization. The antimetabolite radiosensitizers may inhibit thymidylate synthase (TS) or ribonucleotide reductase, and the nucleoside/nucleobase analogs can be incorporated into DNA. Radiosensitization can result from chemotherapy-induced increase in DNA double-strand breaks or inhibition of their repair. Studies of repair pathways involved in radiosensitization with antimetabolites implicate base excision repair with the TS inhibitors, homologous recombination with gemcitabine, and mismatch repair with FU and gemcitabine. Gemcitabine can also stimulate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation; inhibiting this effect with EGFR inhibitors can potentiate cytotoxicity and radiosensitization. Additional work is necessary to determine more precisely the processes by which antimetabolites act as radiation sensitizers and to define the optimal sequencing of these agents with EGFR inhibitors to provide better guidance for clinical protocols combining these drugs with radiotherapy.

Mismatched nucleotides as the lesions responsible for radiosensitization with gemcitabine: a new paradigm for antimetabolite radiosensitizers

Radiation sensitization by 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (dFdCyd) has correlated with dATP depletion [dFdCDP-mediated inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase (RR)] and S-phase accumulation. We hypothesized that radiosensitization by dFdCyd is due to nucleotide misincorporations in the presence of deoxynucleotide triphosphate pool imbalances, which, if not repaired, augments cell death following irradiation. The ability of dFdCyd to produce misincorporations was measured as pSP189 plasmid mutations in hMLH1-deficient [mismatch repair (MMR) deficient] and hMLH1-expressing (MMR proficient) HCT116 cells. Only MMR-deficient cells showed a significant increase in nucleotide misincorporations (2- to 3-fold increase; P <or= 0.01) after radiosensitizing concentrations of dFdCyd +/- 5 Gy radiation, which persisted for at least 96 h. dFdCyd (10 nmol/L) did not radiosensitize MMR-proficient HCT116 or A549 cells, but following small interfering RNA-mediated suppression of hMLH1, this concentration produced excellent radiosensitization (radiation enhancement ratios = 1.6 +/- 0.1 and 1.5 +/- 0.1, respectively; P < 0.05) and a 2.5-fold increase in mutation frequency in A549 cells. Cytosine arabinoside (1-beta-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine), which can be incorporated into DNA but does not inhibit RR, failed to radiosensitize MMR-deficient cells or increase mutation frequency in the MMR-deficient and MMR-proficient cells. However, the RR inhibitor hydroxyurea radiosensitized MMR-deficient cells and increased nucleotide misincorporations (>or=5-fold increase; P < 0.05), thus further implicating the inhibition of RR as the mechanism underlying radiosensitization by dFdCyd. These data showed that the presence and persistence of mismatched nucleotides is integral to radiosensitization by dFdCyd and suggest a role for hMLH1 deficiency in eliciting the radiosensitizing effect.

Radiosensitizing potential of the selective cyclooygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor meloxicam on human glioma cells

The COX-2 protein is frequently overexpressed in human malignant gliomas. This expression has been associated with their aggressive growth characteristics and poor prognosis for patients. Targeting the COX-2 pathway might improve glioma therapy. In this study, the effects of the selective COX-2 inhibitor meloxicam alone and in combination with irradiation were investigated on human glioma cells in vitro. A panel of three glioma cell lines (D384, U87 and U251) was used in the experiments from which U87 cells expressed constitutive COX-2. The response to meloxicam and irradiation (dose-range of 0-6 Gy) was determined by the clonogenic assay, cell proliferation was evaluated by growth analysis and cell cycle distribution by FACS. 24-72 h exposure to 250-750 microM meloxicam resulted in a time and dose dependent growth inhibition with an almost complete inhibition after 24 h for all cell lines. Exposure to 750 microM meloxicam for 24 h increased the fraction of cells in the radiosensitive G(2)/M cell cycle phase in D384 (18-27%) and U251 (17-41%) cells. 750 microM meloxicam resulted in radiosensitization of D384 (DMF:2.19) and U87 (DMF:1.25) cells, but not U251 cells (DMF:1.08). The selective COX-2 inhibitor meloxicam exerted COX-2 independent growth inhibition and radiosensitization of human glioma cells.

The relation between deoxycytidine kinase activity and the radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine in eight different human tumour cell lines

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine (dFdC) is an active antitumour agent with radiosensitising properties, shown both in preclinical and clinical studies. In the present study, the relation between deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) activity and the radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine was investigated in eight different human tumour cell lines.

METHODS

Tumour cells were treated with dFdC (0-100 nM) for 24 h prior to radiotherapy (RT) (gamma-Co60, 0-6 Gy, room temperature). Cell survival was determined 7, 8, or 9 days after RT by the sulforhodamine B test. dCK activity of the cells was determined by an enzyme activity assay.

RESULTS

A clear concentration-dependent radiosensitising effect of dFdC was observed in all cell lines. The degree of radiosensitisation was also cell line dependent and seemed to correlate with the sensitivity of the cell line to the cytotoxic effect of dFdC. The dCK activity of our cell lines varied considerably and differed up to three fold from 5 to 15 pmol/h/mg protein between the tested cell lines. In this range dCK activity was only weakly related to radiosensitisation (correlation coefficient 0.62, p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine needs to be metabolised to the active nucleotide in order to radiosensitise the cells. Since dFdCTP accumulation and incorporation into DNA are concentration dependent, the degree of radiosensitisation seems to be related to the extent of dFdCTP incorporated into DNA required to inhibit DNA repair. The activity of dCK does not seem to be the most important factor, but is clearly a major factor. Other partners of the intracellular metabolism of gemcitabine in relation to the cell cycle effects and DNA repair could be more responsible for the radiosensitising effect than dCK activity.