Influence of margin status and radiation on recurrence after radical hysterectomy in Stage IB cervical cancer

The impact of boost radiation therapy after hysterectomy on cervical cancer patients with close or positive resection margins

PURPOSE

We investigated the effect of boost radiation therapy (RT) in addition to whole pelvis RT (WPRT) on treatment outcome and safety of cervical cancer patients following hysterectomy with close/positive resection margins (RM).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with cervical cancer who received WPRT with or without boost-RT as adjuvant treatment between July 2006 and June 2022. Twenty patients (39.2%) were treated with WPRT-alone, and 31 (60.8%) received boost-RT after WPRT using brachytherapy or intensity-modulated RT.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 41 months. According to RT modality, the 4-year local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) rates of patients treated with WPRT-alone were 61% and 61%, respectively, whereas those in LC and LRC rates in patients who underwent WPRT with boost-RT were 93.2% and 75.3%, with p-values equal to 0.005 and 0.090, respectively. Seven patients (35.0%) had local recurrence in the WPRT-treated group compared to only two out of the 31 patients (6.5%) in the WPRT with boost-RT-treated counterparts (p = 0.025). Boost-RT was a significantly good prognostic factor for LC (p = 0.013) and LRC (p = 0.013). Boost-RT did not result in statistically-significant improvements in progression-free survival or overall survival. The acute and late toxicity rates were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Boost RT following WPRT is a safe and effective treatment strategy to improve LC without increasing toxicity in patients with cervical cancer with close/positive RM after hysterectomy.

Role of brachytherapy in post-operative cervical cancer patients with risk factors other than positive stump

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of brachytherapy in post-operative cervical cancer patients with risk factors other than positive stump, and to identify the candidates most likely to benefit.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed, non-metastatic cervical cancer patients treated in our hospital between January 2012 and November 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Early stage patients receiving radical surgery and needing adjuvant external radiotherapy were included, but those with positive stump were excluded. All patients received external radiotherapy. They were divided into two groups: one group received vaginal brachytherapy and the other did not. The 5-year local-regional recurrence free survival (LRRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-five patients were included in this study; while 99 received brachytherapy, 126 did not. The brachytherapy group had significantly superior 5-year LRRFS (87.7% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.004), but did not show a significant overall survival benefit (78.4% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.055). In multivariate analysis, brachytherapy, pathological type, high-risk factors, duration of radiotherapy, and transfusion were independent prognostic factors for 5-year LRRFS. In stratified analysis, the brachytherapy group showed superior LRRFS in those meeting Sedlis criteria (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

The combination of external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy can improve LRRFS in post-operative cervical cancer patients with risk factors other than positive stump. Therefore, brachytherapy should be considered for these patients.

Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Management: A Review on Novel Prognostic Factors in Primary and Recurrent Tumors

BACKGROUND

Several pathological parameters, including tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, lympho-vascular space invasion and lymph node status, have been proposed as prognostic predictors in cervical cancer. However, given the high mortality and recurrence rate of cervical cancer, novel parameters that are able to provide additional prognostic information are needed in order to allow a better prognostic stratification of cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

A search was conducted on PubMed to identify relevant literature data regarding prognostic factors in cervical cancer. The key words "cervical cancer", "prognostic factors", "pathology", and "outcome" were used.

RESULTS

The novel pathological grading system based on tumor budding and cell nest size appeared the most relevant prognostic factor in primary neoplasms. Moreover, other potentially useful prognostic factors were tumor size, depth of stromal invasion, lympho-vascular space invasion, perineural invasion, tumor-free distance and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Prognostic factors related to advanced-stage cervical cancer, including lymph-nodes status, endometrial and cervical involvement as well as distant metastases, were also taken into consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, tumor budding and cell nest size grading system, depth of stromal invasion, lympho-vascular space invasion, perineural invasion, tumor-free distance and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes appeared the most relevant factors included in the pathology report.

Dataset for the Reporting of Carcinoma of the Cervix: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

Cervical carcinoma remains one of the most common cancers affecting women worldwide, despite effective screening programs being implemented in many countries for several decades. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) dataset for cervical carcinoma was first developed in 2017 with the aim of developing evidence-based standardized, consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for resection specimens. This 4th edition update to the ICCR dataset on cervical cancer was undertaken to incorporate major changes based upon the updated International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (FIGO) staging for carcinoma of the cervix published in 2018 and the 5th Edition World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumors published in 2020 and other significant developments in pathologic aspects of cervical cancer. This updated dataset was developed by a panel of expert gynecological pathologists and an expert gynecological oncologist, with a period of open consultation. The revised dataset includes "core" and "noncore" elements to be reported; these are accompanied by detailed explanatory notes and references providing the rationale for the updates. Standardized reporting using datasets such as this helps facilitate consistency and accuracy, data collection across different sites and comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters for quality and research purposes.

SUCCOR Risk: Design and Validation of a Recurrence Prediction Index for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Objective

Based on the SUCCOR study database, our primary objective was to identify the independent clinical pathological variables associated with the risk of relapse in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent a radical hysterectomy. Our secondary goal was to design and validate a risk predictive index (RPI) for classifying patients depending on the risk of recurrence.

Methods

Overall, 1116 women were included from January 2013 to December 2014. We randomly divided our sample into two cohorts: discovery and validation cohorts. The test group was used to identify the independent variables associated with relapse, and with these variables, we designed our RPI. The index was applied to calculate a relapse risk score for each participant in the validation group.

Results

A previous cone biopsy was the most significant independent variable that lowered the rate of relapse (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17–0.60). Additionally, patients with a tumor diameter >2 cm on preoperative imaging assessment (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.33–3.5) and operated by the minimally invasive approach (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.00–2.57) were more likely to have a recurrence. Based on these findings, patients in the validation cohort were classified according to the RPI of low, medium, or high risk of relapse, with rates of 3.4%, 9.8%, and 21.3% observed in each group, respectively. With a median follow-up of 58 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 97.2% for the low-risk group, 88.0% for the medium-risk group, and 80.5% for the high-risk group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Previous conization to radical hysterectomy was the most powerful protective variable of relapse. Our risk predictor index was validated to identify patients at risk of recurrence.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-022-11671-5.

Comparison of treatment outcomes of pelvis external radiotherapy with and without vaginal brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients with positive or close vaginal resected margins

BACKGROUND

We evaluated whether there is a difference in the local recurrence and survival after pelvic external radiotherapy (ERT) with and without boost vaginal brachytherapy (VB) in cervical cancer patients with positive or close vaginal resected margins (RM).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed FIGO stage IA-IIB cervical cancer patients treated with postoperative ERT between 1997 and 2018. The sixty patients showing close (safety margin < 5 mm) or positive vaginal RM were included. ERT was delivered with median 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the pelvis and VB with median 30 Gy in 6 fractions.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 46 months. Five out of 30 patients treated with ERT alone experienced vaginal recurrence within 2 years after surgery. The 5-year local control (LC) was 100% in patients receiving ERT + VB compared with 81.3% in patients receiving ERT alone (log rank p = 0.022). The 5-year pelvic control (PC) was 95.8% for patients receiving ERT + VB and 76.8% for ERT alone (p = 0.041). The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were not significantly different between treatment groups. In multivariate analysis, perineural invasion was a significant risk factor for PC (p = 0.024). Parametrial involvement (p = 0.044) and vascular invasion (p = 0.032) were unfavorable prognostic factors for RFS. Late toxicity occurrences were not significant in both groups.

CONCLUSION

VB after ERT improved LC and PC in cervical cancer patients with close or positive RM after hysterectomy. The toxicities were not increased after VB was added to ERT.

Incorporation of vaginal brachytherapy to external beam radiotherapy in adjuvant therapy for high-risk early-stage cervical cancer: A comparative study

PURPOSE

To examine trends, characteristics, and outcomes related to addition of vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This comparative study is a retrospective observational analysis of the National Cancer Institutes' Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Surgically treated women with stage T1-2 cervical cancer who had high-risk factors (nodal metastasis and/or parametrial invasion) and received adjuvant radiotherapy from 2000 to 2018 were examined. Propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to assess the survival estimates for addition of VBT use.

RESULTS

Among 2470 women with high-risk factors receiving EBRT, 760 (30.8%) had additional VBT. During the study period, there was an increasing trend of VBT use from 27.4% to 36.1% (p< 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis and high-risk tumor factors: parametrial involvement, large tumor size, and use of chemotherapy remained independent characteristics associated with VBT use (all, p< 0.05). In propensity score-weighted models, VBT use with EBRT and EBRT alone had comparable overall survival (5-year rates 73.8% vs. 77.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.25). Nonsignificant association was also observed in squamous or nonsquamous tumors, young or old age, low or high nodal ratio, chemotherapy use, and simple or radical hysterectomy (all, p> 0.05). Lastly, the addition of VBT was not associated with cervical cancer-specific survival (subdistribution-HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-1.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of VBT with EBRT for adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk early-stage cervical cancer is increasing in the United States. Addition of VBT was associated with neither overall survival nor cancer-specific survival.

Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A French multicentric study

OBJECTIVES

A recent randomized controlled trial has reconsidered the use of laparoscopy for treating patients with early-stage cervical cancer with radical hysterectomy (RH). We aimed to evaluate if surgical approach had an impact on surgical and oncological outcomes in these patients in a French setting.

METHODS

Data of 1706 patients with cervical cancer treated between 1996 and 2017 were extracted from maintained databases of 9 French University hospitals. Patients, with FIGO stage IA2 to IIB tumors, treated by radical hysterectomy were selected for further analysis. A propensity score matching was used with a ratio of 2:1 in favor of laparoscopic approach was used. The Kaplan Meier method was used to estimate the survival distribution.

RESULTS

34 patients treated with laparotomy were matched with 61 patients treated by minimally invasive surgery (MIS). There was no difference regarding overall survival (91 % vs 81 %, p > 0.05) or disease-free survival (82 % vs 78 %, p > 0.05). There was no difference regarding surgical outcomes with no excess of postoperative complication in patients with MIS. Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients operated on laparotomy.

CONCLUSION

In our study, there was no evidence of a difference in survival between minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy in patients treated with radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Impact of Brachytherapy Boost and Dose-escalated External Beam Radiotherapy in Margin Positive Cervical Cancer Treated With Chemotherapy and Radiation

OBJECTIVES

We examined the impact of brachytherapy boost (BB) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose-escalation on overall survival (OS) for women with cervical cancer receiving postoperative chemotherapy and radiation (CRT) for a positive margin following hysterectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2015 for women with nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the cervix who had a positive margin following hysterectomy and received postoperative CRT. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed with multivariate logistic regression. Survival analyses were performed with univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Propensity-score weighted cohorts were generated with inverse probability of treatment weighting via generalized boosted regression modeling.

RESULTS

Of 630 women receiving CRT, 331 (53%) received EBRT alone and 299 (47%) received EBRT+BB. Eighty-two percent had chemotherapy initiation within 2 weeks of radiation, suggesting concurrent delivery. Median EBRT dose was 5040 cGy. Intracavitary high-dose rate was the most common BB (67%). Inclusion of BB was more likely with larger tumor sizes (odds ratio=1.03, P=0.002). Women receiving EBRT+BB had improved OS compared to EBRT alone for both unweighted (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; P=0.020) and propensity-score weighted cohorts (HR, 0.70; P=0.017), and this finding was consistent across multiple patient subsets. EBRT dose-escalation >5040 cGy was not found to be associated with OS (unweighted HR, 1.38; P=0.065 and weighted HR, 1.16; P=0.450).

CONCLUSION

The addition of BB to standard CRT improved OS for women with cervical cancer and a positive margin after hysterectomy. No consistent survival benefit was seen to EBRT dose-escalation beyond 5040 cGy.

High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for recurrent cervical cancer in the vaginal stump after hysterectomy

This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients who received high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-BT) using Iridium-192 with or without external beam radiotherapy as definitive treatment for recurrent cervical cancer after hysterectomy. Thirty-six patients with local recurrence after hysterectomy received radiotherapy including HDR-BT from 2005 to 2013. Overall survival, local control rate, and progression-free survival were estimated retrospectively via the Kaplan-Meier method. Late adverse events were also scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Median follow-up time was 38 (range, 7.4–101.3) months. The 3-year estimates of overall survival, local control rate, and progression-free survival were 100.0%, 82.8%, and 76.8%, respectively. Two patients (5.6%) had grade 2 lymphedema, but no other adverse events greater than grade 2 were reported. In conclusion, HDR-BT was an effective treatment modality for patients with cervical cancer recurrence in the vaginal stump.

Vaginal cuff length during radical hysterectomy is a prognostic factor for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of vaginal cuff length (VCL) resected during radical hysterectomy (RH) on the long-term survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage IB–IIA) and to explore whether VCL is a prognostic factor for cervical cancer.

Methods

A total of 435 eligible patients with stage IB and IIA cervical cancer who underwent RH in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan, People’s Republic of China) from January 2007 to February 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into two groups (VCL ≤2.0 cm and >2.0 cm) for further analysis according to the VCL during RH. The Kaplan–Meier method was adopted to calculate the survival rates. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyze independent prognosis factors for survival.

Results

Of the 435 identified patients, 196 had VCL ≤2.0 cm and 239 had VCL >2.0 cm after RH. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) for the group who had VCL ≤2.0 cm vs the group who had VCL >2.0 cm was 68.1% vs 87.5% (P<0.001). Correspondingly, the overall survival (OS) for the two groups was 71.4% vs 89.2% (P<0.001). More interestingly, the VCL was significantly associated with the 5-year local recurrence rate, but not associated with the distant metastasis rate. In addition to the VCL, FIGO stage and lymph node involvement were also identified as significant prognostic factors for cervical cancer.

Conclusion

Resection of VCL >2.0 cm in RH has a more favorable long-term outcome than VCL ≤2.0 cm among patients with cervical cancer (FIGO stage IB–IIA); shorter VCL resection was significantly associated with local recurrence, DFS, and OS; thus, it can be considered as a prognostic factor for cervical cancer.

Significance of elevated SCC-Ag level on tumor recurrence and patient survival in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of uterine cervix following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a multi-institutional analysis

Objective

There is no definitive guideline for the significance and cut-off value of squamous-cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) in cervical cancer. Thus, we analyzed the significance and optimal cut-off value of SCC-Ag for predicting tumor recurrence and patient survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of uterine cervix.

Methods

From January 2010 to October 2016, we enrolled 304 cervical cancer patients with squamous-cell carcinoma staging International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Ib–IVa and treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by intra-cavitary radiotherapy (ICR). The cut-off value of SCC-Ag level for tumor recurrence was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the significance of SCC-Ag level.

Results

The optimal cut-off value of SCC-Ag level for predicting tumor recurrence was calculated and set at 4.0 ng/mL in the ROC curve. After a median follow-up period of 36.5 months, the 3-year RFS (56.6% vs. 80.2%, p<0.001) and OS (72.1% vs. 86.8%, p=0.005) were significantly lower in SCC-Ag ≥4 ng/mL arm than in <4 ng/mL arm. The 3-year locoregional recurrence (17.6% vs. 7.0%, p=0.012), distant metastasis (20.4% vs. 6.9%, p=0.002), and para-aortic recurrence (9.4% vs. 2.1%, p=0.012) rates were significantly higher in SCC-Ag ≥4 ng/mL arm than in SCC-Ag <4 ng/mL arm.

Conclusion

Pre-treatment SCC-Ag level higher than 4 ng/mL may be a useful predictor of tumor recurrence in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of uterine cervix treated with definitive CRT and ICR.

Margins for cervical and vulvar cancer

Surgery is the primary treatment for vulvar cancer as well as early-stage carcinoma of the cervix. This article reviews the significance of margin status after surgery on overall survival, need for further surgical intervention, and role for possible adjuvant therapy. It summarizes the abundant literature on margin status in vulvar cancer and highlights the need for further investigation on the prognostic significance of margins in cervical cancer. In addition, it reviews other important operative considerations.

Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer

This is a retrospective study which aims to identify major determinants of successful laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) performed by inexperienced surgeons for stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. A total of 161 consecutive patients with stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer who underwent RH were grouped into 2 groups according to the surgeons’ experience with LRH: experienced surgeon versus inexperienced surgeon. After matching for age and risk factors, surgical and survival outcomes were compared. Experienced surgeon selected patients with earlier-stage and fewer risk factors for LRH than ARH, but inexperience surgeons did not. After matching, the vaginal tumor-free margin of LRH was shorter than that of ARH in experienced surgeon group (1.3 versus 1.7 cm, p=0.007); however, the vaginal tumor-free margin was longer than that of ARH in the inexperienced surgeon group (1.8 versus 1.3 cm, p=0.035). The postoperative hospital stay of LRH was shorter than that of ARH in experienced surgeon group (5.5 versus 7.7 days, p<0.001), but not different from that of ARH in the inexperienced surgeon group. Vaginal tumor-free margin >1.8 cm (OR 7.33, 95% CI 1.22–40.42), stage >IB1 (OR 8.83, 95% CI 1.51–51.73), and estimated blood loss >575 mL (OR 33.95, 95% CI 4.87–236.79) were independent risk factors for longer postoperative hospital stay in the inexperienced surgeon group. There was no difference of 5-year-profression-free survival of LRH patients between experienced surgeon and inexperienced surgeon groups after matching (55.1 versus 33.3%, p=0.391). Selection of earlier-stage disease and moderate vaginal tumor-free margin might be important for an inexperienced surgeon to successfully perform LRH with minimal complications in stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer.

Risk strata-based therapy and outcome in stage Ib-IIa carcinoma cervix: single-centre ten-year experience

Aim

To review the outcome of stage (Ib, IIa), cervical cancer patients were primarily treated with radical hysterectomy and risk-based postoperative therapy.

Material and methods

Between January 2001 and December 2011, 601 cases underwent surgery followed by tailored therapy. Patients were classified into low risk (pelvic lymph node negative, tumour less than 4 cm, no evidence of lympho-vascular invasion, less than one-third of thickness of surgical stoma involved), intermediate risk (positive lympho-vascular space invasion, tumour size more than 4 cm, and deep invasion of cervical stroma), and high risk (pelvic lymph node involved, positive parametrial, or vaginal margins) groups. Postoperative adju-vant therapy in the form of radiotherapy alone to those with intermediate risk and chemo-radiotherapy to those with high risk was given to patients. The median follow-up was 60 months.

Results

The majority of patients had intermediate risk. The overall event-free survival (EFS) at five years was 74.37%, with EFS of 86.5% in those from the low-risk group, 73% in those from the intermediate-risk group, and 64% in those from the high-risk group. In conclusion, risk strata-based adjuvant postoperative therapy is able to provide a favourable outcome in patients with stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer with a nearly 11% improvement in survival compared with historical control.

The impact of close surgical margins after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

While it is known that positive surgical margins increase the risk of cervical cancer recurrence, little is known about the effect of close surgical margins (CSM). Therefore, we set out to determine the impact of margin status on recurrence and survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing radical hysterectomy from 2000 to 2010 with Stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. CSM were defined as ≤5mm; association with other clinicopathologic factors as well as recurrence and survival was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 119 patients, 75 (63%) with CSM had a recurrence rate of 24% compared to 9% without CSM. Though not independently associated with recurrence, CSM were significantly associated with positive lymph nodes (44% vs. 18%), positive parametria (33.3% vs. 2.3%), larger tumors (3.5 vs. 2.5cm), greater depth of stromal invasion (DOI) (84% vs. 33%), and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (61.3% vs. 34.1%). We failed to find an association between adjuvant therapy and recurrence in those with CSM. Exploratory analysis revealed that a surgical margin of ≤2mm was significantly associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (36% vs. 9%, p=0.009) as well as loco-regional recurrence (22% vs. 4%, p=0.0034).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical margins of ≤5mm on radical hysterectomy specimens are often associated with other high or intermediate risk factors for recurrence. While not a proven independent risk factor, the distance to surgical margin may warrant further investigation as an intermediate risk factor along with tumor size, DOI and LVSI.

Impact of various treatment modalities on the outcome of stage IB1-IIA cervical adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of patients with stage IB1-IIA cervical adenocarcinoma treated by various modalities in order to formulate a better treatment strategy.

METHODS

The impact of various treatment modalities on the prognosis of 258 patients with stage IB1-IIA cervical adenocarcinoma was investigated. The therapeutic modalities included radical surgery (n=174); radical surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), such as RT alone or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) (n=46); or primary RT or CCRT (n=38).

RESULTS

As compared with patients in the surgery-only group, patients with 1 postoperative major risk who underwent surgery followed by RT or CCRT had a significantly higher likelihood of disease relapse (2.3-fold, P=0.041) and disease-related death (2.9-fold, P=0.014). The likelihood of recurrence (P=0.32) and death (P=0.58) did not differ between patients who underwent adjuvant RT or CCRT for 1 major risk factor and those who underwent primary RT or CCRT. By contrast, patients with more than 1 major risk factor had a higher likelihood of disease recurrence (2.9-fold, P=0.037) and disease-related death (3.4-fold, P=0.051) than those who underwent primary RT or CCRT.

CONCLUSION

Radical surgery is recommended for patients with stage IB1-IIA cervical adenocarcinomas without contraindications. Those with more than 1 postoperative pathologic risk factor had the worst prognosis despite adjuvant RT or CCRT.