2281

Statin Use and the Risk of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence Following Definitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Background

Numerous studies have reported the role of statins on biochemical recurrence (BCR) among patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after definite treatment. However, the conclusions of these studies are contradictory. We aimed to determine the effect of statins on BCR of PCa using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched PubMed (Medline) and other databases for cohort studies evaluating the effect of statins on the BCR of patients with PCa between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021. The random effects (RE) model and quality effects (QE) model were used to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (pHR) and pooled risk ratio (pRR) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results

A total of 33 cohort studies were finally selected and included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Statin use was significantly associated with a 14% reduction in the HR of BCR (pHR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.95, I² = 64%, random effects model, 31 studies) and a 26% reduction in the RR of BCR (pRR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.94, 24,591 patients, I² = 88%, random effects model, 15 studies) among patients with PCa. The subgroup analyses showed that statins could result in 22% reduction in the HR of BCR (pHR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.98, I² = 57%, random effects model) among patients accepting radiotherapy (RT).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that statins have a unique role in the reduction of BCR in patients with PCa after definite treatment, especially RT. In the future, more clinical trials and in vitro and animal experiments are needed to further verify the effects of statins in PCa and the potential mechanisms.

Association between statins and clinical outcomes among men with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mixed evidence exists regarding the effects of statins among men with prostate cancer. We aimed to determine the association between statin use and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer using systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Original articles published until second week of August 2015 were searched in electronic databases (Medline-Ovid, Pubmed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest) for studies on statin use in prostate cancer. The main clinical outcomes for the review were: biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastases, and all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (pHR) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Heterogeneity between the studies was examined using I(2) statistics. Meta-regression was performed, wherever significant heterogeneity was found in the meta-analyses, to find factors associated with poor outcomes, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of findings. The analyses were conducted using RevMan v5.3, STATA v14, and R v3.1.1.

RESULTS

Out of the 1002 retrieved citations, 34 observational cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Statin use was associated with a 21% reduction in the risk of BCR among those treated with radiation therapy (pHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.95, P-value=0.01, 10 studies, I(2)=54%), whereas it was not associated with the BCR among those treated with radical prostatectomy (pHR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.09, P-value=0.43, 15 studies, I(2)=65%). Statin use was associated with a 22% reduction in the risk of metastases (pHR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.87, P-value<0.001, 6 studies, I(2)=0%), and a 24% reduction in risk of both all-cause mortality (pHR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.91, P-value=0.004, 6 studies, I(2)=71%), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (pHR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.89, P-value=0.0007, 5 studies, I(2)=40%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review found that statin significantly reduced the all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality and improved the BCR in certain subgroup of men with prostate cancer. In future, randomized controlled trials should be conducted to establish efficacy of statins among men with prostate cancer.

Statins and prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In this meta-analysis, we evaluated associations between statins and recurrence-free survival (RFS) following treatment of localized prostate cancer, with attention to potential benefits among patients treated primarily with radiotherapy (RT) versus radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified original studies examining the effect of statins on men who received definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer using a systematic search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases through August 2012. Our search yielded 17 eligible studies from 794 references; 13 studies with hazard ratios (HRs) for RFS were included in the formal meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, statins did not affect RFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74-1.08). However, in RT patients (six studies), statins were associated with a statistically significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49-0.93); this benefit was not observed in radical prostatectomy patients (seven studies). Sensitivity analyses suggested that primary treatment modality may impact the effect of statins on prostate cancer recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests a potentially beneficial effect of statins on prostate cancer patients treated with RT but not among radical prostatectomy patients. Although limited by the lack of randomized data, these results suggest that primary treatment modality should be considered in future studies examining associations between statins and oncologic outcomes.

No effect of statins on biochemical outcomes after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of concurrent statin use during definitive radiotherapy (RT) on the biochemical outcomes for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

A total of 968 patients treated with RT had information about medication use available. Of these, 23% had been taking using statins during RT. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined by a biochemical failure definition of prostate-specific antigen nadir plus 2 ng/mL, clinical failure, start of androgen deprivation therapy, or death.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 68 years. The median radiation dose was 76 Gy. Of the patients, 29% underwent androgen deprivation therapy. The 5-year overall survival rate was 83%. The median PFS time was 7.8 years versus 6.4 years, and the 5-year PFS rate was 70% versus 59% in favor of the statin users (P = 0.03). The analysis by risk group demonstrated no significant statin effect in any of the three risk strata. Stratification by hydrophilic versus hydrophobic statin agents revealed similar results. Multivariate analysis revealed that T stage (P <0.0001), pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level (P <0.0001), and Gleason score (P = 0.0026) were significant predictors of PFS; however, statin use (P = 0.48), androgen deprivation therapy (P = 0.95), pelvic RT (P = 0.96), radiation dose (P = 0.13), age (P = 0.19), and year of treatment (P = 0.07) were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use did not affect PFS after adjusting for differences in treatment year and multiple prognostic factors. However, T stage, baseline prostate-specific antigen level, and Gleason score were critical determinants of prostate-specific antigen failure. These results did not differ when hydrophilic pravastatin was excluded.