Implications of Respiratory Motion as Measured by Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Radiation Treatment Planning of Esophageal Cancer

Analysis of left ventricle regional myocardial motion for cardiac radioablation: Left ventricular motion analysis

PURPOSE

Left ventricle (LV) regional myocardial displacement due to cardiac motion was assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images to establish region-specific margins for cardiac radioablation treatments.

METHODS

CMR breath-hold cine images and LV myocardial tissue contour points were analyzed for 200 subjects, including controls (n = 50) and heart failure (HF) patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, n = 50), mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, n = 50), and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n = 50). Contour points were divided into segments according to the 17-segment model. For each patient, contour point displacements were determined for the long-axis (all 17 segments) and short-axis (segments 1-12) directions. Mean overall, tangential (longitudinal or circumferential), and normal (radial) displacements were calculated for the 17 segments and for each segment level.

RESULTS

The greatest overall motion was observed in the control group-long axis: 4.5 ± 1.2 mm (segment 13 [apical anterior] epicardium) to 13.8 ± 3.0 mm (segment 6 [basal anterolateral] endocardium), short axis: 4.3 ± 0.8 mm (segment 9 [mid inferoseptal] epicardium) to 11.5 ± 2.3 mm (segment 1 [basal anterior] endocardium). HF patients exhibited lesser motion, with the smallest overall displacements observed in the HFrEF group-long axis: 4.3 ± 1.7 mm (segment 13 [apical anterior] epicardium) to 10.6 ± 3.4 mm (segment 6 [basal anterolateral] endocardium), short axis: 3.9 ± 1.3 mm (segment 8 [mid anteroseptal] epicardium) to 7.4 ± 2.8 mm (segment 1 [basal anterior] endocardium).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides an estimate of epicardial and endocardial displacement for the 17 segments of the LV for patients with normal and impaired LV function. This reference data can be used to establish treatment planning margin guidelines for cardiac radioablation. Smaller margins may be used for patients with higher degree of impaired heart function, depending on the LV segment.

Stomach Motion and Deformation: Implications for Preoperative Gastric Cancer Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Selection and development of image guided strategies for preoperative gastric radiation therapy requires quantitative knowledge of the various sources of anatomic changes of the stomach. This study aims to investigate the magnitude of interfractional and intrafractional stomach motion and deformation using fiducial markers and 4-dimensional (4D) imaging.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fourteen patients who underwent preoperative gastric cancer radiation therapy received 2 to 6 fiducial markers distributed throughout the stomach (total of 54 markers) and additional imaging (ie, 1 planning 4D computed tomography [pCT], 20-25 pretreatment 4D cone beam [CB] CTs, 4-5 posttreatment 4D CBCTs). Marker coordinates on all end-exhale (EE) and end-inhale (EI) scans were obtained after a bony anatomy match. Interfractional marker displacements (ie, between EE pCT and all EE CBCTs) were evaluated for 5 anatomic regions (ie, cardia, small curvature, proximal and distal large curvature, and pylorus). Motion was defined as displacement of the center-of-mass of available markers (COMstomach), deformation as the average difference in marker-pair distances. Interfractional (ie, between EE pCT and all EE CBCTs), respiratory (between EE and EI pCT and CBCTs), and pre-post (pre- and posttreatment EE CBCTs) motion and deformation were quantified.

RESULTS

The interfractional marker displacement varied per anatomic region and direction, with systematic and random errors ranging from 1.6-8.8 mm and 2.2-8.2 mm, respectively. Respiratory motion varied per patient (median, 3-dimensional [3D] amplitude 5.2-20.0 mm) and day (interquartile range, 0.8-4.2 mm). Regarding COMstomach motion, respiratory motion was larger than interfractional motion (median, 10.9 vs 8.9 mm; P < .0001; Wilcoxon rank-sum), which was larger than pre-post motion (3.6 mm; P < .0001). Interfractional deformations (median, 5.8 mm) were significantly larger than pre-post deformations (2.6 mm; P < .0001), which were larger than respiratory deformation (1.8 mm; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The demonstrated sizable stomach motions and deformations during radiation therapy stress the need for generous nonuniform planning target volume margins for preoperative gastric cancer radiation therapy. These margins can be decreased by daily image guidance and adaptive radiation therapy.

Account for the Full Extent of Esophagus Motion in Radiation Therapy Planning: A Preliminary Study of the IRV of the Esophagus

Objective

Accounting for esophagus motion in radiotherapy planning is an important basis for accurate assessment of toxicity. In this study, we calculated how much the delineations of the esophagus should be expanded based on three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT), four-dimensional (4D) average projection (AVG), and maximum intensity projection (MIP) scans to account for the full extent of esophagus motion during 4D imaging acquisition.

Methods and Materials

The 3D and 4D CT scans of 20 lung cancer patients treated with conventional radiotherapy and 20 patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SBRT) were used. Radiation oncologists contoured the esophagus on the 3DCT, AVG, MIP and 25% exhale scans, and the combination of the esophagus in every phase of 4DCT. The union of all 4D phase delineations (U4D) represented the full extent of esophagus motion during imaging acquisition. Surface distances from U4D to 3D, AVG, and MIP volumes were calculated. Distances in the most extreme surface points (1.5 cm most superoinferior, 10% most right/left/anteroposterior) were used to derive margins accounting only for systematic (delineation) errors.

Results

Esophagus delineations on the MIP were the closest to the full extent of motion, requiring only 6.9 mm margins. Delineations on the AVG and 3D scans required margins up to 7.97 and 7.90 mm, respectively. The largest margins were for the inferior, right, and anterior aspects for the delineations on the 3D, AVG, and MIP scans, respectively.

Conclusion

Delineations on 3D, AVG, or MIP scans required extensions for representing the esophagus’s full extent of motion, with the MIP requiring the smallest margins. Research including daily imaging to determine the random components for the margins and dosimetric measurements to determine the relevance of creating a planning organ at risk volume (PRV) of the esophagus is required.

Measuring breathing induced oesophageal motion and its dosimetric impact

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy allows for a precise dose delivery. Organ motion bears the risk of undetected high dose healthy tissue exposure. An organ very susceptible to high dose is the oesophagus. Its low contrast on CT and the oblong shape render motion estimation difficult. We tackle this issue by modern algorithms to measure oesophageal motion voxel-wise and estimate motion related dosimetric impacts.

METHODS

Oesophageal motion was measured using deformable image registration and 4DCT of 11 internal and 5 public datasets. Current clinical practice of contouring the organ on 3DCT was compared to timely resolved 4DCT contours. Dosimetric impacts of the motion were estimated by analysing the trajectory of each voxel in the 4D dose distribution. Finally an organ motion model for patient-wise comparisons was built.

RESULTS

Motion analysis showed mean absolute maximal motion amplitudes of 4.55 ± 1.81 mm left-right, 5.29 ± 2.67 mm anterior-posterior and 10.78 ± 5.30 mm superior-inferior. Motion between cohorts differed significantly. In around 50% of the cases the dosimetric passing criteria was violated. Contours created on 3DCT did not cover 14% of the organ for 50% of the respiratory cycle and were around 38% smaller than the union of all 4D contours. The motion model revealed that the maximal motion is not limited to the lower part of the organ. Our results showed motion amplitudes higher than most reported values in the literature and that motion is very heterogeneous across patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual motion information should be considered in contouring and planning.

A comprehensive motion analysis - consequences for high precision image-guided radiotherapy of esophageal cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

When treating patients for esophageal cancer (EC) with photon or proton radiotherapy (RT), breathing motion of the target and neighboring organs may result in deviations from the planned dose distribution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and dosimetric impact of breathing motion. Results were based on comparing weekly 4D computed tomography (4D CT) scans with the planning CT, using the diaphragm as an anatomical landmark for EC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 20 EC patients were included in this study. Diaphragm breathing amplitudes and off-sets (changes in position with respect to the planning CT) were determined from delineated left diaphragm structures in weekly 4D CT-scans. The potential dosimetric impact of respiratory motion was shown in several example patients for photon and proton radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Variation in diaphragm amplitudes were relatively small and ranged from 0 to 0.8 cm. However, the measured off-sets were larger, ranging from -2.1 to 1.9 cm. Of the 70 repeat CT-scans, the off-set exceeded the ITV-PTV margin of 0.8 cm during expiration in 4 CT-scans (5.7%) and during inspiration in 13 CT-scans (18.6%). The dosimetric validation revealed under- and overdosages in the VMAT and IMPT plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite relatively constant breathing amplitudes, the variation in the diaphragm position (off-set), and consequently tumor position, was clinically relevant. These motion effects may result in either treatments that miss the target volume, or dose deviations in the form of highly localized over- or underdosed regions.

The use of tumour markers in oesophageal cancer to quantify setup errors and baseline shifts during treatment

•

Implantation of solid gold markers safe.

•

Inter-fractional motion for markers in distal oesophagus largest cranio-caudally.

•

Reduced radiotherapy treatment margins with soft-tissue vs. bony-anatomy matching.

•

Impact of intra-fractional baseline shifts on margin calculation rather small.

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of solid gold marker placement in oesophageal cancer patients and to quantify inter-fractional and intra-fractional (baseline shift) marker motion during radiation treatment. Radiotherapy target margins and matching strategies were investigated.

Materials/methods

Thirty-four markers were implanted by echo-endoscopy in 10 patients. Patients received a planning 4D CT, daily pre-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT) and a post-treatment CBCT for at least five fractions. For fractions with both pre- and post-treatment CBCT, marker displacement between planning CT and pre-treatment CBCT (inter-fractional) and between pre-treatment and post-treatment CBCT (intra-fractional; only for fractions without rotational treatment couch correction) were calculated in left–right (LR), cranio-caudal (CC) and anterior-posterior (AP) direction after bony-anatomy and soft-tissue matching. Systematic/random setup errors were estimated; treatment margins were calculated.

Results

No serious adverse events occurred. Twenty-three (67.6%) markers were visible during radiotherapy (n = 3 middle oesophagus, n = 16 distal oesophagus, n = 4 proximal stomach). Margins for inter-fractional displacement after bony-anatomy match depended on the localisation of the primary tumour and were 11.2 mm (LR), 16.4 mm (CC) and 8.2 mm (AP) for distal markers. Soft-tissue matching reduced the CC margin for these markers (16.4 mm to 10.5 mm). The mean intra-fractional shift of 12 distal markers was 0.4 mm (LR), 2.3 mm (CC) and 0.7 mm (AP). Inclusion of this shift resulted in treatment margins for distal markers of 12.8 mm (LR), 17.3 mm (CC) and 10.4 mm (AP) after bony-anatomy matching and 12.4 mm (LR), 11.4 mm (CC) and 9.7 mm (AP) after soft-tissue matching.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the implantation of gold markers was safe, albeit less stable compared to other marker types. Inter-fractional motion was largest cranio-caudally for markers in the distal oesophagus, which was reduced after soft-tissue compared to bony-anatomy matching. The impact of intra-fractional baseline shifts on margin calculation was rather small.

Quantifying the Interfractional motion of Esophagus Using Daily Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Oral Contrast During Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To quantify the interfractional motion of the esophagus during fractionated radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We registered simulation 4-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and daily cone beam CT (CBCT) and documented the motion of the esophagus centroid at 5-mm interval slices in right-left (RL) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions. Oral barium sulfate was administrated during CBCT to help localize the esophagus. Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Thirty-five 4-dimensional CT scans, 595 CBCT scans, and 25,970 slices were analyzed. The slice-derived motion values for all patients were presented as 2.5 to 97.5 percentiles and ranges stratified by segments. The magnitude of motion for each individual patient was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of daily motion values stratified by segments. Correlations between the magnitude of motion and clinical variables were explored.

RESULTS

The 2.5 to 97.5 percentiles of RL and AP motion were -4.2 to 7.1 and -4.4 to 5.1; -10.3 to 6.0 and -4.3 to 3.8; -8.7 to 5.5 and -6.4 to 2.8; and -9.1 to 4.7 and -5.8 to 3.3 mm for cervical, proximal, middle, and distal thoracic esophagus, respectively. The interfractional motion was direction- and location-dependent. The magnitude of RL motion was greater than that of AP motion for the 4 segments (P < .05). In the RL direction, the magnitude of motion was greater for the middle thoracic esophagus than for the cervical (median SD 2.7 vs 2.0 mm, P = .001) and proximal thoracic esophagus (median SD 2.7 vs 2.1 mm, P = .002). Patients with right lung tumor and bulky lymph nodes tended to display greater RL esophageal motion.

CONCLUSIONS

The interfractional motion of the esophagus can be considerable during radiation therapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, especially for middle thoracic esophagus in RL direction. Strategies to minimize the effect of interfractional esophageal motion on dosimetry should be considered.

Impact of Esophageal Motion on Dosimetry and Toxicity With Thoracic Radiation Therapy

Purpose:

To investigate the impact of intra- and inter-fractional esophageal motion on dosimetry and observed toxicity in a phase I dose escalation study of accelerated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer.

Methods and Materials:

Patients underwent computed tomography imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning (CT1 and 4DCT1) and at 2 weeks (CT2 and 4DCT2) and 5 weeks (CT3 and 4DCT3) after initiating treatment. Each computed tomography scan consisted of 10-phase 4DCTs in addition to a static free-breathing or breath-hold computed tomography. The esophagus was independently contoured on all computed tomographies and 4DCTs. Both CT2 and CT3 were rigidly registered with CT1 and doses were recalculated using the original intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan based on CT1 to assess the impact of interfractional motion on esophageal dosimetry. Similarly, 4DCT1 data sets were rigidly registered with CT1 to assess the impact of intrafractional motion. The motion was characterized based on the statistical analysis of slice-by-slice center shifts (after registration) for the upper, middle, and lower esophageal regions, respectively. For the dosimetric analysis, the following quantities were calculated and assessed for correlation with toxicity grade: the percent volumes of esophagus that received at least 20 Gy (V20) and 60 Gy (V60), maximum esophageal dose, equivalent uniform dose, and normal tissue complication probability.

Results:

The interfractional center shifts were 4.4 ± 1.7 mm, 5.5 ± 2.0 mm and 4.9 ± 2.1 mm for the upper, middle, and lower esophageal regions, respectively, while the intrafractional center shifts were 0.6 ± 0.4 mm, 0.7 ± 0.7 mm, and 0.9 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. The mean V60 (and corresponding normal tissue complication probability) values estimated from the interfractional motion analysis were 7.8% (10%), 4.6% (7.5%), 7.5% (8.6%), and 31% (26%) for grade 0, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 toxicities, respectively.

Conclusions:

Interfractional esophageal motion is significantly larger than intrafractional motion. The mean values of V60 and corresponding normal tissue complication probability, incorporating interfractional esophageal motion, correlated positively with esophageal toxicity grade.

Dosimetric Benefits of Midposition Compared With Internal Target Volume Strategy for Esophageal Cancer Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Both midposition (MidP) and internal target volume (ITV) strategies can take the respiration-induced target motion into account. This study aimed to compare these 2 strategies in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs) for esophageal cancer radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen patients with esophageal cancer were included retrospectively for neoadjuvant RT planning. Per patient, a 10-phase, 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) scan (4D-CT) was acquired with CTV and OARs delineated on the 20% phase. The MidP-CT scan was reconstructed based on deformable image registration between the 20% phase and the other 9 phases; thereby, the CTV and OARs delineations were propagated and an ITV was constructed. Both MidP and ITV strategies were used for treatment planning, yielding the planned dose. Next, these plans were applied to the 10-phase 4D-CT to calculate the dose distribution for each phase of the 4D-CT. On the basis of the deformable image registration, these calculated dose distributions were warped and averaged to yield the accumulated 4D dose. Subsequently, we compared, in terms of CTV coverage and dose to OARs, the planned dose with the accumulated 4D dose and the MidP strategy with the ITV strategy.

RESULTS

The differences between the planned dose and the accumulated 4D dose were limited and clinically irrelevant. In 14 patients, both MidP and ITV strategies showed V_95% > 98% for the CTV. Compared with the ITV strategy, the MidP strategy showed a significant reduction of approximately 10% in the dose-volume histogram parameters for the lungs, heart, and liver (P < .001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the ITV strategy, the MidP strategy in treatment planning can lead to a reduction of approximately 10% in the dose to OARs, with an adequate CTV coverage for esophageal cancer RT.

Effects of respiratory motion on volumetric and positional difference of GTV in lung cancer based on 3DCT and 4DCT scanning

Differences in gross target volume (GTV) and central point positions among moving lung cancer models constructed by CT scanning at different frequencies were compared, in order to explore the effect of different respiratory frequencies on the GTV constructions in moving lung tumors. Eight models in different shapes and sizes were established to stimulate lung tumors. The three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scanning were performed at 10, 15 and 20 times/min in different models. Differences in GTV volumes and central point positions at different motion frequencies were compared by means of GTV3Ds (GTV_3D-10, GTV_3D-15, GTV_3D-20) and IGTV4Ds (IGTV_4D-10, IGTV_4D-15, IGTV_4D-20). Volumes of GTV_3D-10, GTV_3D-15, GTV_3D-20 were 12.41±14.26, 10.38±11.18 and 12.50±15.23 cm³ respectively (P=0.687). Central point coordinates in the x-axis direction were −8.16±96.21, −8.57±96.08 and −8.56±95.73 respectively (P=0.968). Central point coordinates in the y-axis direction were 108.22±25.03, 110.41±22.47 and 109.04±24.24 (P=0.028). Central point coordinates in the z-axis direction were 65.19±13.68, 65.43±13.40 and 65.38±13.17 (P=0.902). The difference was significant in the y-axis direction (P=0.028). Volumes of IGTV_4D-10, IGTV_4D-15, IGTV_4D-20 were 17.78±19.42, 17.43±19.56 and 17.44±18.80 cm³ (P=0.417). Central point coordinates in the x-axis direction were −7.73±95.93, −7.86±95.56 and −7.92±95.14 (P=0.325). Central point coordinates in the y-axis direction were 109.41±24.54, 109.60±24.13 and 109.16±24.28 (P=0.525). Central point coordinates in the z-axis direction were 65.52±13.31, 65.59±13.39 and 65.51±13.34 (P=0.093). However, the central point position of GTV in the head and foot direction by 3DCT scanning was severely affected by the respiratory frequency.

Gross tumour delineation on computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oesophageal cancer: A nationwide study

•

Interobserver variability in delineation of the oesophageal GTV can be considerable.

•

Delineation variation is mainly located at the cranial and caudal border.

•

PET significantly influences the delineated GTV in oesophageal cancer.

•

The impact of PET to CT on observer variation of the GTV is limited.

•

Accurate GTV delineation is essential for results of radiation boost-strategies.

Background and purpose

Accurate delineation of the primary tumour is vital to the success of radiotherapy and even more important for successful boost strategies, aiming for improved local control in oesophageal cancer patients. Therefore, the aim was to assess delineation variability of the gross tumour volume (GTV) between CT and combined PET-CT in oesophageal cancer patients in a multi-institutional study.

Materials and methods

Twenty observers from 14 institutes delineated the primary tumour of 6 cases on CT and PET-CT fusion. The delineated volumes, generalized conformity index (CIgen) and standard deviation (SD) in position of the most cranial/caudal slice over the observers were evaluated. For the central delineated region, perpendicular distance between median surface GTV and each individual GTV was evaluated as in-slice SD.

Results

After addition of PET, mean GTVs were significantly smaller in 3 cases and larger in 1 case. No difference in CIgen was observed (average 0.67 on CT, 0.69 on PET-CT). On CT cranial-caudal delineation variation ranged between 0.2 and 1.5 cm SD versus 0.2 and 1.3 cm SD on PET-CT. After addition of PET, the cranial and caudal variation was significantly reduced in 1 and 2 cases, respectively. The in-slice SD was on average 0.16 cm in both phases.

Conclusion

In some cases considerable GTV delineation variability was observed at the cranial-caudal border. PET significantly influenced the delineated volume in four out of six cases, however its impact on observer variation was limited.

Intrafraction esophageal motion in patients with clinical T1N0 esophageal cancer

Aim

To investigate the intrafraction movement of the esophagus using fiducial markers.

Background

Studies on intrafraction esophageal motion using the fiducial markers are scarce.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with clinical T1N0 esophageal cancer who had received fiducial markers at our hospital between July 2007 and December 2013. Real-Time Position Management System to track the patient's respiration was used, and each patient underwent three-dimensional computed tomography of the resting expiratory and inspiratory level. We used the center of the marker to calculate the distance between the expiratory and inspiratory breath-holds, which were measured with the radiotherapy treatment planning system in three directions: left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP). The movements at each site were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis analysis and Wilcoxon rank sum test with a Bonferroni correction.

Results

A total of 101 patients with 201 fiducial markers were included. The upper, middle and lower thoracic positions had 40, 77, and 84 markers, respectively. The mean absolute magnitudes of the shifts (standard deviation) were 0.18 (0.19) cm, 0.68 (0.46) cm, and 0.24 (0.24) cm in the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. From the cumulative frequency distribution, we assumed that 0.35 cm LR, 0.8 cm SI, and 0.3 cm AP in the upper; 0.5 cm LR, 1.55 cm SI, and 0.55 cm AP in the middle; and 0.75 cm LR, 1.9 cm SI, and 0.95 cm AP in the lower thoracic esophagus covered 95% of the cases.

Conclusions

The internal margin based on the site of esophagus was estimated.

Quantifying esophageal motion during free-breathing and breath-hold using fiducial markers in patients with early-stage esophageal cancer

Introduction

Cardiac toxicity after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer is a critical issue. To reduce irradiation doses to organs at risk, individual internal margins need to be identified and minimized. The purpose of this study was to quantify esophageal motion using fiducial makers based on four-dimensional computed tomography, and to evaluate the inter-CBCT session marker displacement using breath-hold.

Materials and methods

Sixteen patients with early stage esophageal cancer, who received endoscopy-guided metallic marker placement for treatment planning, were included; there were 35 markers in total, with 9, 15, and 11 markers in the upper thoracic, middle thoracic, and lower thoracic/esophagogastric junction regions, respectively. We defined fiducial marker motion as motion of the centroidal point of the markers. Respiratory esophageal motion during free-breathing was defined as the amplitude of individual marker motion between the consecutive breathing and end-expiration phases, derived from four-dimensional computed tomography. The inter-CBCT session marker displacement using breath-hold was defined as the amplitudes of marker motion between the first and each cone beam computed tomography image. Marker motion was analyzed in the three regions (upper thoracic, middle thoracic, and lower thoracic/esophagogastric junction) and in three orthogonal directions (right-left; anterior-posterior; and superior-inferior).

Results

Respiratory esophageal motion during free-breathing resulted in median absolute maximum amplitudes (interquartile range), in right-left, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions, of 1.7 (1.4) mm, 2.0 (1.5) mm, and 3.6 (4.1) mm, respectively, in the upper thoracic region, 0.8 (1.1) mm, 1.4 (1.2) mm, and 4.8 (3.6) mm, respectively, in the middle thoracic region, and 1.8 (0.8) mm, 1.9 (2.0) mm, and 8.0 (4.5) mm, respectively, in the lower thoracic/esophagogastric region. The inter-CBCT session marker displacement using breath-hold resulted in median absolute maximum amplitudes (interquartile range), in right-left, anterior–posterior, and superior-inferior directions, of 1.3 (1.0) mm, 1.1 (0.7) mm, and 3.3 (1.8) mm, respectively, in the upper thoracic region, 0.7 (0.7) mm, 1.1 (0.4) mm, and 3.4 (1.4) mm, respectively, in the middle thoracic region, and 2.0 (0.8) mm, 2.6 (2.2) mm, and 3.5 (1.8) mm, respectively, in the lower thoracic/esophagogastric region.

Conclusions

During free-breathing, esophageal motion in the superior-inferior direction in all sites was large, compared to the other directions, and amplitudes showed substantial inter-individual variability. The breath-hold technique is feasible for minimizing esophageal displacement during radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

PET imaging in adaptive radiotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the multimodality treatment of several gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Positron-emission tomography (PET) has an established role in the diagnosis, response assessment and (re-)staging of these tumors. Nevertheless, the value of PET in adaptive radiotherapy remains unclear. This review focuses on the role of PET in adaptive radiotherapy, i.e. during the treatment course and in the delineation process.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The MEDLINE database was searched for the terms ("Radiotherapy"[Mesh] AND "Positron-Emission Tomography"[Mesh] AND one of the site-specific keywords, yielding a total of 1710 articles. After abstract selection, 27 papers were identified for esophageal neoplasms, 1 for gastric neoplasms, 9 for pancreatic neoplasms, 6 for liver neoplasms, 1 for biliary tract neoplasms, none for colonic neoplasms, 15 for rectal neoplasms and 12 for anus neoplasms.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The use of PET for truly adaptive radiotherapy during treatment for GI tumors has barely been investigated, in contrast to the potential of the PET-defined metabolic tumor volume for optimization of the target volume. The optimized target definition seems useful for treatment individualization such as focal boosting strategies in esophageal, pancreatic and anorectal cancer. Nevertheless, for all GI tumors, further investigation is needed.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, too little data are available to conclude on the role of PET imaging during radiotherapy for ART strategies in GI cancer. On the other hand, based on the available evidence, the use of biological imaging for target volume adaptation seems promising and could pave the road towards individualized treatment strategies.

Tumour motion of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma evaluated by cine MRI: associated with tumour location

AIM

To evaluate the association between oesophageal tumour motion and tumour location using cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled, and underwent cine MRI of oesophageal tumours. The maximum displacements in the anterior-posterior (A-P), superior-inferior (S-I), and left-right (L-R) directions of the tumours were assessed statistically to show their associations with tumour location.

RESULTS

Tumour motion in A-P and S-I directions increased from upper to lower oesophagus (r=0.505, p=0.003; and r=0.600, p<0.001, respectively). In A-P and S-I directions, tumours showed larger motion in the lower oesophagus than in the upper or middle oesophagus (all p<0.05). Motion of middle and lower oesophageal tumours in the S-I direction was larger than in L-R or A-P direction (all p<0.05). To provide 95% geometric coverage for the motion of upper oesophageal tumours, statistical analysis showed margins of 3.75 mm in L-R direction, 3.72 mm in A-P direction, and 5.38 mm in S-I direction. For the motion of tumours of the middle oesophagus, 95% coverage required margins of 8.50, 6.62, and 11.96 mm in L-R, A-P, and S-I directions, respectively, and for lower oesophageal tumours, 95% coverage required margins of 9.17, 9.68, and 12.98 mm in L-R, A-P, and S-I direction, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oesophageal tumour motion in different directions can be associated with tumour location as shown on cine MRI, suggesting that the present findings could be helpful for better understanding oesophageal tumour motion and gating individualised radiation delivery strategies.

Magnitude, Impact, and Management of Respiration-induced Target Motion in Radiotherapy Treatment: A Comprehensive Review

Tumors in thoracic and upper abdomen regions such as lungs, liver, pancreas, esophagus, and breast move due to respiration. Respiration-induced motion introduces uncertainties in radiotherapy treatments of these sites and is regarded as a significant bottleneck in achieving highly conformal dose distributions. Recent developments in radiation therapy have resulted in (i) motion-encompassing, (ii) respiratory gating, and (iii) tracking methods for adapting the radiation beam aperture to account for the respiration-induced target motion. The purpose of this review is to discuss the magnitude, impact, and management of respiration-induced tumor motion.

Treatment of esophageal cancer with radiation therapy -a pan-Chinese survey of radiation oncologists

Lots of controversies were found about the treatment in relation to radiation therapy (RT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We designed a questionnaire of these controversies to do a pan-Chinese survey of radiation oncologists (ROs). For operable ESCC, 53% ROs chose surgery plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while 40% chose preoperative CRT plus surgery. For target volume of postoperative RT, most ROs (92%) would delineate tumor bed plus involved lymph nodes region before surgery. For definitive RT, most ROs (81%) would give patients higher RT dose to 60-65Gy. For radiation target volume, most ROs would give patients prophylactic irradiation of the bilateral superclavicular-lymph nodes region for cervical ESCC (93%), and the left gastric lymph nodes region for lower thoracic ESCC (72%). For the treatment of mediastinal lymph nodes, 72% ROs preferred elective nodal irradiation, while 28% did the involved nodal irradiation. For concurrent chemotherapy regimen, PF (5-Fu + cisplatin) and TP (cisplatin + paclitaxel) were used widely (49% and 46%, respectively). During simulation, four-dimensional computer tomography (4D CT) was not widely used (48%), even for cervical or lower thoracic ESCC (52%). For daily RT delivery, only 66% ROs would perform imaging guidance RT daily. In summary, more controversies existed in the treatment of ESCC with RT in China, including treatment strategy, radiation dose and target contour. Future goals include standardization of treatment strategy, radiation dose, and target contour, and application of 4D CT and daily imaging guidance, and pursuit of randomized trials in Chinese population.

Recent advances in intensity modulated radiotherapy and proton therapy for esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy is an important component of the standard of care for esophageal cancer. In the past decades, significant improvements in the planning and delivery of radiation techniques have led to better dose conformity to the target volume and improved normal tissue sparing. Areas covered: This review focuses on the advances in radiotherapy techniques and summarizes the availably dosimetric and clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy, proton therapy, and four-dimensional radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, and discusses the challenges and future development of proton therapy. Expert commentary: Although three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the standard radiotherapy technique in esophageal cancer, the retrospectively comparative studies strongly suggest that the dosimetric advantage of IMRT over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy can translate into improved clinical outcomes, despite the lack of prospective randomized evidence. As a novel form of conventional IMRT technique, volumetric modulated arc therapy can produce equivalent or superior dosimetric quality with significantly higher treatment efficiency in esophageal cancer. Compared with photon therapy, proton therapy has the potential to achieve further clinical improvement due to their physical properties; however, prospective clinical data, long-term results, and cost-effectiveness are needed.

A comparative study of target volumes based on 18F-FDG PET-CT and ten phases of 4DCT for primary thoracic squamous esophageal cancer

Purpose

To investigate the correlations in target volumes based on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and four-dimensional CT (4DCT) to detect the feasibility of implementing PET in determining gross target volumes (GTV) for tumor motion for primary thoracic esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods

Thirty-three patients with EC sequentially underwent contrast-enhanced 3DCT, 4DCT, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT thoracic simulation. The internal gross target volume (IGTV)₁₀ was obtained by combining the GTV from ten phases of 4DCT. The GTVs based on PET/CT images were defined by setting of different standardized uptake value thresholds and visual contouring. The difference in volume ratio, conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI) between IGTV₁₀ and GTV_PET was compared.

Results

The images from 20 patients were suitable for further analysis. The optimal volume ratio of 0.95±0.32, 1.06±0.50, 1.07±0.49 was at standardized uptake value (SUV)_2.5, SUV_20%, or manual contouring. The mean CIs were from 0.33 to 0.54. The best CIs were at SUV_2.0 (0.51±0.11), SUV_2.5 (0.53±0.13), SUV_20% (0.53±0.12), and manual contouring (0.54±0.14). The mean DIs of GTV_PET in IGTV₁₀ were from 0.60 to 0.90, and the mean DIs of IGTV₁₀ in GTV_PET ranged from 0.35 to 0.78. A negative correlation was found between the mean CI and different SUV (P=0.000).

Conclusion

None of the PET-based contours had both close spatial and volumetric approximation to the 4DCT IGTV₁₀. Further evaluation and optimization of PET as a tool for target identification are required.

Esophageal motion characteristics in thoracic esophageal cancer: Impact of clinical stage T4 versus stages T1-T3

PURPOSE

The main purpose was to investigate the differences of the esophageal motion (EM) and the internal target volume (ITV) margins for the esophagus between clinical T1-T3 (cT1-T3) and cT4 cases, using 4-dimensional computed tomography. A secondary purpose was to assess the metastatic lymph nodal motion (NM) and the ITV margins for lymph nodes (LNs) using the datasets of patients with nodal involvement pathologically defined.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed patients with thoracic esophageal cancer consecutively treated with definitive chemoradiation, measuring the EM and the ITV margins in the left-right, anteroposterior, and superoinferior directions. All esophageal contours were divided at the carina. The EM and NM were measured from the displacement of the centroid point between 0% images (at the end of inhalation) and 50% images (at the end of exhalation). The ITV margins were defined as the maximum distance in each direction from the clinical target volume at the 4-dimensional computed tomography average images to the intersection of the clinical target volume at the 0% and 50% images of complete coverage in each patient.

RESULTS

The EM below the carina in cT4 was significantly smaller than that in cT1-T2 in all directions (P < .01) and than that in cT3 in all directions (left-right: P = .03, anteroposterior and superoinferior: P < .01). The EM in the case of a cT4 tumor located below the carina was smaller than that in the case of cT4 tumor located above the carina. The NM of abdominal-LNs was much larger than that of cervicothoracic-LNs and the EM below the carina. These tendencies were similar in the ITV measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The EM and the ITV margins in cT4 were significantly smaller than those in cT1-T3. The NM and the ITV margins of abdominal LNs were much larger than those of cervicothoracic LNs and the esophagus. In clinical radiation therapy planning for esophageal cancer, we should take cT stage into consideration.

Comparison of planning target volumes based on three-dimensional and four-dimensional CT imaging of thoracic esophageal cancer

Background and purpose

To investigate the definition of planning target volumes (PTVs) based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) compared with conventional PTV definition and PTV definition using asymmetrical margins for thoracic primary esophageal cancer.

Materials and methods

Forty-three patients with esophageal cancer underwent 3DCT and 4DCT simulation scans during free breathing. The motions of primary tumors located in the proximal (group A), middle (group B), and distal (group C) thoracic esophagus were obtained from the 4DCT scans. PTV_3D was defined on 3DCT using the tumor motion measured based on 4DCT, PTV conventional (PTV_conv) was defined on 3DCT by adding a 1.0 cm margin to the clinical target volume, and PTV_4D was defined as the union of the target volumes contoured on the ten phases of the 4DCT images. The centroid positions, volumetric differences, and dice similarity coefficients were evaluated for all PTVs.

Results

The median centroid shifts between PTV_3D and PTV_4D and between PTV_conv and PTV_4D in all three dimensions were <0.3 cm for the three groups. The median size ratios of PTV_4D to PTV_3D were 0.80, 0.88, and 0.71, and PTV_4D to PTV_conv were 0.67, 0.73, and 0.76 (χ²=−3.18, −2.98, and −3.06; P=0.001, 0.003, and 0.002) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The dice similarity coefficients were 0.87, 0.90, and 0.81 between PTV_4D and PTV_3D and 0.80, 0.84, and 0.83 between PTV_4D and PTV_conv (χ² =−3.18, −2.98, and −3.06; P=0.001, 0.003, and 0.002) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The difference between the degree of inclusion of PTV_4D in PTV_3D and that of PTV_4D in PTV_conv was <2% for all groups. Compared with PTV_conv, the amount of irradiated normal tissue for PTV_3D was decreased by 11.81% and 11.86% in groups A and B, respectively, but was increased by 2.93% in group C.

Conclusion

For proximal and middle esophageal cancer, 3DCT-based PTV using asymmetrical margins provides good coverage of PTV_4D; however, for distal esophageal cancer, 3DCT-based PTV using conventional margins provides ideal conformity with PTV_4D.

Are fiducial markers useful surrogates when using respiratory gating to reduce motion of gastroesophageal junction tumors?

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral component of the management of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors. We evaluated the use of implanted radiopaque fiducials as tumor surrogates to allow for more focal delivery of RT to these mobile tumors when using respiratory gating (RG) to reduce motion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed four-dimensional computed tomography scans of 20 GEJ patients treated with RG and assessed correlation between tumor and implanted fiducial motion over the whole respiratory cycle and within a clinically realistic gate around end-exhalation. We evaluated fiducial motion concordance in 11 patients with multiple fiducials.

RESULTS

Gating reduced anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) mean tumor and fiducial motions by over 50%. Fiducials and primary tumor motions were moderately correlated: R(2) for AP and SI linear fits to the entire group were 0.54 and 0.68, respectively, but the correlation had strong inter-patient variation. For all patients with multiple fiducials, relative in-gate displacements were below 3 mm; results were similar for eight of 11 patients over the whole cycle.

CONCLUSION

Implanted fiducial and gross tumor volume (GTV) motions correlate well but the correlation is patient-specific and may be dependent on the location of the fiducials with respect to the GTV.

Correlation of primary middle and distal esophageal cancers motion with surrounding tissues using four-dimensional computed tomography

Purpose

To investigate the correlation of gross tumor volume (GTV) motion with the structure of interest (SOI) motion and volume variation for middle and distal esophageal cancers using four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT).

Patients and methods

Thirty-three patients with middle or distal esophageal carcinoma underwent 4DCT simulation scan during free breathing. All image sets were registered with 0% phase, and the GTV, apex of diaphragm, lung, and heart were delineated on each phase of the 4DCT data. The position of GTV and SOI was identified in all 4DCT phases, and the volume of lung and heart was also achieved. The phase relationship between the GTV and SOI was estimated through Pearson’s correlation test.

Results

The mean peak-to-peak displacement of all primary tumors in the lateral (LR), anteroposterior (AP), and superoinferior (SI) directions was 0.13 cm, 0.20 cm, and 0.30 cm, respectively. The SI peak-to-peak motion of the GTV was defined as the greatest magnitude of motion. The displacement of GTV correlated well with heart in three dimensions and significantly associated with bilateral lung in LR and SI directions. A significant correlation was found between the GTV and apex of the diaphragm in SI direction (r_left=0.918 and r_right=0.928). A significant inverse correlation was found between GTV motion and varying lung volume, but the correlation was not significant with heart (r_LR=−0.530, r_AP=−0.531, and r_SI=−0.588) during respiratory cycle.

Conclusion

For middle and distal esophageal cancers, GTV should expand asymmetric internal margins. The primary tumor motion has quite good correlation with diaphragm, heart, and lung.

Differences in displacement of the proximal and distal ends of mid-upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

In the present study, clips were used as markers to evaluate displacement differences between proximal and distal ends of esophageal tumors and to test whether their internal target volume (ITV) margins should be determined separately. A total of 23 patients with mid-upper thoracic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma, a tumor length of ≤8 cm and an esophageal lumen suitable for endoscopic ultrasonography were recruited for the present study. Clips were implanted endoscopically at the proximal and distal ends of the esophageal tumor (upper and lower clips). In a further exploratory study on 16 of the patients, a third clip was placed at the distal esophagus 2 cm above the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) (cardiac clip). The clips were contoured for all 10 phases of the four-dimensional computed tomography and the maximum displacements of the clip centroids among different breathing phases in left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were marked as x, y and z, respectively. The ITV margins that covered 95% of the LR, SI and AP motion were 2.89, 5.00 and 2.36 mm, respectively. Axial displacement (y) was greater than radial displacement (x, z; P<0.05). It was also revealed that LR(x), SI(y) and AP(z) displacement of cardiac clips was greater than that of upper or lower clips (P<0.05). Differences in the axial and radial displacement of the upper and lower clips indicated that axial and radial ITV margins should be determined separately. However, further study is required on patients in whom the distal tumor end is located in proximity to the GEJ.

Effect of contrast enhancement in delineating GTV and constructing IGTV of thoracic oesophageal cancer based on 4D-CT scans

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of contrast enhancement on delineating the gross tumour volumes (GTVs) of different respiratory phases and constructing the corresponding internal GTVs (IGTVs) of primary thoracic oesophageal cancer based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scans.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with upper (14 cases), middle (16 cases), or lower (15 cases) thoracic oesophageal cancer sequentially underwent conventional plain and contrast-enhanced 4D-CT scans during free breathing. First, the GTVs were delineated on plain 4D-CT, and the corresponding IGTVs were constructed by a physician. Then the GTVs were delineated on contrast-enhanced 4D-CT images, and the corresponding IGTVs were constructed by the same physician using the same standards.

RESULTS

The coefficient of variation for the target volume delineated on contrast-enhanced 4D-CT images was constantly smaller than that for plain 4D-CT images. The length of the GTVs along the z axis, as well as the volumes of the GTVs that were delineated and the IGTVs that were constructed, did not change between contrast-enhanced and plain 4D-CT images in patients with upper or lower thoracic oesophageal cancer (P>0.05), but showed significant differences in patients with middle thoracic oesophageal cancer (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced 4D-CT scans can reduce the error of target volume delineation and be used to construct a more accurate internal target volume in patients with middle thoracic oesophageal cancer, however, whether GTV delineation or IGTV construction for patients with upper or lower thoracic oesophageal cancer, no significant benefit was found from contrast-enhanced 4D-CT scan.

Implications of free breathing motion assessed by 4D-computed tomography on the delivered dose in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of breathing motion on the delivered dose in esophageal cancer 3-dimensional (3D)-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). We assessed 16 patients with esophageal cancer. All patients underwent 4D-computed tomography (4D-CT) for treatment planning. For each of the analyzed patients, 1 3D-CRT, 1 IMRT, and 1 VMAT (RapidArc-RA) plan were calculated. Each of the 3 initial plans was recalculated on the 4D-CT (for the maximum free inspiration and maximum free expiration) to assess the effect of breathing motion. We assessed the minimum dose (Dmin) and mean dose (Dmean) to the esophagus within the planning target volume, the volume changes of the lungs, the Dmean and the total lung volume receiving at least 40Gy (V40), and the V30, V20, V10, and V5. For the heart we assessed the Dmean and the V25. Over all techniques and all patients the change in Dmean as compared with the planned Dmean (planning CT [PCT]) to the esophagus was 0.48% in maximum free inspiration (CT_insp) and 0.55% in maximum free expiration (CT_exp). The Dmin CT_insp change was 0.86% and CT_exp change was 0.89%. The Dmean change of the lungs (heart) was in CT_insp 1.95% (2.89%) and 3.88% (2.38%) in CT_exp. In all, 4 patients had a clinically relevant change of the dose (≥ 5% Dmean to the heart and the lungs) between inspiration and expiration. These patients had a very cranially or caudally situated tumor. There are no relevant differences in the delivered dose to the regions of interest among the 3 techniques. Breathing motion management could be considered to achieve a better sparing of the lungs or heart in patients with cranially or caudally situated tumors.

Dosimetric evaluation of anatomical changes during treatment to identify criteria for adaptive radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Some oesophageal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and concomitant radiotherapy (chemoRT) show large interfractional anatomical changes during treatment. These changes may modify the dose delivered to the target and organs at risk (OARs). The aim of the presenwt study was to investigate the dosimetric consequences of anatomical changes during treatment to obtain criteria for an adaptive RT decision support system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were treated with chemoRT for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer and set up according to daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCTs) scans. All patients had an additional replanning CT scan at median fraction number 10 (9-14), which was deformably registered to the original planning CT. Gross tumour volumes (GTVs), clinical target volumes (CTVs) and OARs were transferred to the additional CT and corrected by an exwperienced physician. Treatment plans were recalculated and dose to targets and OARs was evaluated. Treatment was adapted if the volume receiving 95% of the prescribed dose (V95%) coverage of CTV decreased > 1% or planning target volume (PTV) decreased by > 3%.

RESULTS

In total, nine adaptive events were observed: All nine were triggered by PTV V95% decrease > 3% [median 11% (5-41%)] and six of these were additionally triggered by CTV V95% decrease > 1% [median 5% (2-35%)]. The largest discrepancies were caused by interfractional baseline or amplitude shifts in diaphragm position (n = 5). Mediastinal (n = 6), oesophageal (n = 6) and bowel filling changes (n = 2) caused the remainder of the changes. For patients with dosimetric changes exceeding the adaptation limits, the discrepancies were confirmed by inspecting the daily CBCTs. In 31% of all patients, heart V30Gy increased more than 2% (maximum 5%). Only minor changes in lung dose or liver dose were seen.

CONCLUSION

Target coverage throughout the course of chemoRT treatment is compromised in some patients due to interfractional anatomical changes. Dose to the heart may increase as well.

Determination of internal target volume for radiation treatment planning of esophageal cancer by using 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)

PURPOSE

To determine an efficient strategy for the generation of the internal target volume (ITV) for radiation treatment planning for esophageal cancer using 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

4DCT sets acquired for 20 patients with esophageal carcinoma were analyzed. Each of the 4DCT sets was binned into 10 respiratory phases. For each patient, the gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated on the 4DCT set at each phase. Various strategies to derive ITV were explored, including the volume from the maximum intensity projection (MIP; ITV_MIP), unions of the GTVs from selected multiple phases ITV2 (0% and 50% phases), ITV3 (ITV2 plus 80%), and ITV4 (ITV3 plus 60%), as well as the volumes expanded from ITV2 and ITV3 with a uniform margin. These ITVs were compared to ITV10 (the union of the GTVs for all 10 phases) and the differences were measured with the overlap ratio (OR) and relative volume ratio (RVR) relative to ITV10 (ITVx/ITV10).

RESULTS

For all patients studied, the average GTV from a single phase was 84.9% of ITV10. The average ORs were 91.2%, 91.3%, 94.5%, and 96.4% for ITV_MIP, ITV2, ITV3, and ITV4, respectively. Low ORs were associated with irregular breathing patterns. ITV3s plus 1 mm uniform margins (ITV3+1) led to an average OR of 98.1% and an average RVR of 106.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The ITV generated directly from MIP underestimates the range of the respiration motion for esophageal cancer. The ITV generated from 3 phases (ITV3) may be used for regular breathers, whereas the ITV generated from 4 phases (ITV4) or ITV3 plus a 1-mm uniform margin may be applied for irregular breathers.

Motion management in gastrointestinal cancers

The presence of tumor and organ motions complicates the planning and delivery of radiotherapy for gastrointestinal cancers. Without proper accounting of the movements, target volume could be under-dosed and the nearby normal critical organs could be over-dosed. This situation is further exacerbated by the close proximity of abdominal tumors to many normal organs at risk (OARs). A number of strategies have been developed to deal with tumor and organ motions in radiotherapy. This article presents a review of the techniques used in the evaluation, quantification, and management of tumor and organ motions for radiotherapy of gastrointestinal cancers.

Four-dimensional versus 3-dimensional computed tomographic planning for gastric mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

PURPOSE

This study compares dosimetric parameters of 4-dimensional (4D) and 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic (CT) planning for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma in an attempt to identify any potential benefit of 4DCT planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified 18 patients who received definitive 4DCT radiation planning from September 2006 to September 2011 for gastric MALT lymphoma at our institution. In addition to the kidneys and liver, we contoured an internal target volume (ITV) and static clinical target volume (sCTV) for each patient based on the 4D and 3D images, respectively, to develop 3D conformal radiation plans. Using the static and motion plans, we measured the volume of ITV covered by at least 95% of the prescribed dose (V95), the minimum dose received by 95% of the ITV (D95), and the volume of organs receiving at least 20 Gy or 30 Gy (V20 or V30).

RESULTS

Volumes of the ITV, motion liver, left kidney, and right kidney were significantly larger than their static counterparts. The static plan significantly lowered the ITV V95 and D95 compared with the motion plan. However, this undercoverage was significantly associated with the superior-inferior (SI) respiratory excursions. A V95 of >98% was observed in 92% of patients with SI excursions <15 mm versus 33% of patients with SI excursions >15 mm (P = .02). When compared with the motion plan, the static plan also significantly lowered the liver V30 and left kidney V20.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3DCT planning can result in undercoverage of the ITV and altered estimation of doses to normal structures. However, in patients with limited respiratory excursions (<15 mm), 4D and 3D images generated similar ITV coverage.

Motion of the esophagus due to cardiac motion

When imaging studies (e.g. CT) are used to quantify morphological changes in an anatomical structure, it is necessary to understand the extent and source of motion which can give imaging artifacts (e.g. blurring or local distortion). The objective of this study was to assess the magnitude of esophageal motion due to cardiac motion. We used retrospective electrocardiogram-gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography images for this study. The anatomic region from the carina to the bottom of the heart was taken at deep-inspiration breath hold with the patients' arms raised above their shoulders, in a position similar to that used for radiation therapy. The esophagus was delineated on the diastolic phase of cardiac motion, and deformable registration was used to sequentially deform the images in nearest-neighbor phases among the 10 cardiac phases, starting from the diastolic phase. Using the 10 deformation fields generated from the deformable registration, the magnitude of the extreme displacements was then calculated for each voxel, and the mean and maximum displacement was calculated for each computed tomography slice for each patient. The average maximum esophageal displacement due to cardiac motion for all patients was 5.8 mm (standard deviation: 1.6 mm, maximum: 10.0 mm) in the transverse direction. For 21 of 26 patients, the largest esophageal motion was found in the inferior region of the heart; for the other patients, esophageal motion was approximately independent of superior-inferior position. The esophagus motion was larger at cardiac phases where the electrocardiogram R-wave occurs. In conclusion, the magnitude of esophageal motion near the heart due to cardiac motion is similar to that due to other sources of motion, including respiratory motion and intra-fraction motion. A larger cardiac motion will result into larger esophagus motion in a cardiac cycle.

Reduced lung dose during radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma: VMAT combined with active breathing control for moderate DIBH

Background

Lung radiation injury is a critical complication of radiotherapy (RT) for thoracic esophageal carcinoma (EC). Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility and dosimetric effects of reducing the lung tissue irradiation dose during RT for thoracic EC by applying volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) combined with active breathing control (ABC) for moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (mDIBH).

Methods

Fifteen patients with thoracic EC were randomly selected to undergo two series of computed tomography (CT) simulation scans with ABC used to achieve mDIBH (representing 80% of peak DIBH value) versus free breathing (FB). Gross tumor volumes were contoured on different CT images, and planning target volumes (PTVs) were obtained using different margins. For PTV_-FB, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was designed with seven fields, and VMAT included two whole arcs. For PTV_-DIBH, VMAT with three 135° arcs was applied, and the corresponding plans were named: IMRT_-FB, VMAT_-FB, and VMAT_-DIBH, respectively. Dosimetric differences between the different plans were compared.

Results

The heart volumes decreased by 19.85%, while total lung volume increased by 52.54% in mDIBH, compared to FB (p < 0.05). The mean conformality index values and homogeneity index values for VMAT_-DIBH (0.86, 1.07) were slightly worse than those for IMRT_-FB (0.90, 1.05) and VMAT_-FB (0.90, 1.06) (p > 0.05). Furthermore, compared to IMRT_-FB and VMAT_-FB, VMAT_-DIBH reduced the mean total lung dose by 18.64% and 17.84%, respectively (p < 0.05); moreover, the V₅, V₁₀, V₂₀, and V₃₀ values for IMRT_-FB and VMAT_-FB were reduced by 10.84% and 10.65% (p > 0.05), 12.5% and 20% (p < 0.05), 30.77% and 33.33% (p < 0.05), and 50.33% and 49.15% (p < 0.05), respectively. However, the heart dose-volume indices were similar between VMAT_-DIBH and VMAT_-FB which were lower than IMRT_-FB without being statistically significant (p > 0.05). The monitor units and treatment time of VMAT_-DIBH were also the lowest (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

VMAT combined with ABC to achieve mDIBH is a feasible approach for RT of thoracic EC. Furthermore, this method has the potential to effectively reduce lung dose in a shorter treatment time and with better targeting accuracy.

Quantification of esophageal tumor motion on cine-magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To quantify the movement of esophageal tumors noninvasively on cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by use of a semiautomatic method to visualize tumor movement directly throughout multiple breathing cycles.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-six patients with esophageal tumors underwent MRI. Tumors were located in the upper (8), middle (7), and lower (21) esophagus. Cine-MR images were collected in the coronal and sagittal plane during 60 seconds at a rate of 2 Hz. An adaptive correlation filter was used to automatically track a previously marked reference point. Tumor movement was measured in the craniocaudal (CC), left-right (LR), and anteroposterior (AP) directions and its relationship along the longitudinal axis of the esophagus was investigated.

RESULTS

Tumor registration within the individual images was typically done at a millisecond time scale. The mean (SD) peak-to-peak displacements in the CC, AP, and LR directions were 13.3 (5.2) mm, 4.9 (2.5) mm, and 2.7 (1.2) mm, respectively. The bandwidth to cover 95% of excursions from the mean position (c95) was also calculated to exclude outliers caused by sporadic movements. The mean (SD) c95 values were 10.1 (3.8) mm, 3.7 (1.9) mm, and 2.0 (0.9) mm in the CC, AP, and LR dimensions. The end-exhale phase provided a stable position in the respiratory cycle, compared with more variety in the end-inhale phase. Furthermore, lower tumors showed more movement than did higher tumors in the CC and AP directions.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrafraction tumor movement was highly variable between patients. Tumor position proved the most stable during the respiratory cycle in the end-exhale phase. A better understanding of tumor motion makes it possible to individualize radiation delivery strategies accordingly. Cine-MRI is a successful noninvasive modality to analyze motion for this purpose in the future.

Detection of interfraction displacement and volume variance during radiotherapy of primary thoracic esophageal cancer based on repeated four-dimensional CT scans

Background

To investigate the interfraction displacement and volume variation of primary thoracic esophagus carcinoma with enhanced four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scanning during fractionated radiotherapy.

Methods

4DCT data sets were acquired at the time of treatment simulation and every ten fraction for each of 32 patients throughout treatment. Scans were registered to baseline (simulation) 4DCT scans by using bony landmarks. The gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were delineated on each data set. Coordinates of the GTV centroids were acquired on each respiration phase. Distance between center of the GTV contour on the simulation scan and the centers on subsequent scans were used to assess interfraction displacement between fractions. Volumes were constructed using three approaches: The GTV delineated from the maximum intensity projection (MIP) was defined IGTV_MIP, all 10 GTVs were combined to form IGTV₁₀, GTV_mean was the average of all 10 phases of each GTV.

Results

Interfraction displacement in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI) directions and 3D vector were 0.13 ± 0.09 cm, 0.16 ± 0.12 cm, 0.34 ± 0.26 cm and 0.43 ± 0.24 cm, respectively between the tenth fraction and simulation 4DCT scan. 0.14 ± 0.09 cm, 0.19 ± 0.16 cm, 0.45 ± 0.43 cm and 0.56 ± 0.40 cm in LR, AP, SI and 3D vector respectively between the twentieth fraction and simulation 4DCT scan. Displacement in SI direction was larger than LR and AP directions during treatment. For distal esophageal cancer, increased interfraction displacements were observed in SI direction and 3D vector (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively) during radiotherapy. The volume of GTV_mean, IGTV_MIP, and IGTV₁₀ decreased significantly at the twentieth fraction for middle (median: 34.01%, 33.09% and 28.71%, respectively) and distal (median: 22.76%, 25.27% and 23.96%, respectively) esophageal cancer, but for the upper third, no significant variation were observed during radiotherapy.

Conclusions

Interfractional displacements in SI direction were larger than LR and AP directions. For distal location, significant changes were observed in SI direction and 3D vector during radiotherapy. For middle and distal locations, the best time to reset position should be selected at the twentieth fraction when the primary tumor target volume changed significantly, and it was preferable to guide target correction and planning modification.

Comparison of patient-specific internal gross tumor volume for radiation treatment of primary esophageal cancer based separately on three-dimensional and four-dimensional computed tomography images

To compare the target volume, position and matching index of the patient-specific internal gross tumor volume (IGTV) based on three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) images for primary esophageal cancer. Twenty-nine patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer underwent 3DCT and 4DCT scans during free breathing. IGTVs were constructed using three approaches: combining the gross target volumes from the 10 respiratory phases of the 4DCT dataset to produce IGTV10 ; IGTV2 was acquired by combining the two extreme phases; and IGTV3D was created from the 3DCT-based gross target volume by enlarging the 95th percentile of motion in each direction measured by the 4DCT. 0.16 cm lateral (LR), 0.14 cm anteroposterior (AP) and 0.29 cm superoinferior (SI) in the upper; 0.18 cm LR, 0.10 cm AP and 0.63 cm SI in the middle; and 0.40 cm LR, 0.58 cm AP and 0.82 cm in the lower thoracic esophagus could account for 95% of respiratory-induced tumor motion. The centroid position shift between IGTV10 and IGTV2 was all below 0.10 cm, and less than 0.20 cm between IGTV10 and IGTV3D . IGTV10 was bigger than IGTV2 ; the mean value of matching index for IGTV2 to IGTV10 was 0.87 ± 0.05, 0.85 ± 0.06 and 0.83 ± 0.05 for upper, middle and distal thoracic esophageal tumors, respectively, and just 0.57 ± 0.11, 0.56 ± 0.13 and 0.40 ± 0.03 between IGTV3D and IGTV10 . 4DCT-based IGTV10 is a reasonable patient-specific IGTV for primary thoracic esophageal cancer, and IGTV2 is considered as an acceptable alternative to IGTV10 . However, it seems unreasonable to use IGTV3D substitute IGTV10 .

Technical considerations in radiation therapy for gastroesophageal junction cancer

Contemporary randomized trials have demonstrated that radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy and surgery improves survival in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of gastroesophageal cancers. Consequently, radiation treatment planning and administration have taken on an added importance to ensure optimal outcomes as well as minimize treatment-related morbidity. This article highlights recent technical advances and considerations for radiation therapy planning for gastroesophageal junction tumors.

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer

Recently, volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has demonstrated the ability to deliver radiation dose precisely and accurately with a shorter delivery time compared to conventional intensity‐modulated fixed‐field treatment (IMRT). We applied the hypothesis of VMAT technique for the treatment of thoracic esophageal carcinoma to determine superior or equivalent conformal dose coverage for a large thoracic esophageal planning target volume (PTV) with superior or equivalent sparing of organs‐at‐risk (OARs) doses, and reduce delivery time and monitor units (MUs), in comparison with conventional fixed‐field IMRT plans. We also analyzed and compared some other important metrics of treatment planning and treatment delivery for both IMRT and VMAT techniques. These metrics include: 1) the integral dose and the volume receiving intermediate dose levels between IMRT and VMATI plans; 2) the use of 4D CT to determine the internal motion margin; and 3) evaluating the dosimetry of every plan through patient‐specific QA. These factors may impact the overall treatment plan quality and outcomes from the individual planning technique used. In this study, we also examined the significance of using two arcs vs. a single‐arc VMAT technique for PTV coverage, OARs doses, monitor units and delivery time. Thirteen patients, stage T2‐T3 N0‐N1 (TNM AJCC 7th edn.), PTV volume median 395 cc (range 281–601 cc), median age 69 years (range 53 to 85), were treated from July 2010 to June 2011 with a four‐field (n=4) or five‐field (n=9) step‐and‐shoot IMRT technique using a 6 MV beam to a prescribed dose of 50 Gy in 20 to 25 F. These patients were retrospectively replanned using single arc (VMATI, 91 control points) and two arcs (VMATII, 182 control points). All treatment plans of the 13 study cases were evaluated using various dose‐volume metrics. These included PTV D99, PTV D95, PTV V9547.5Gy(95%), PTV mean dose, Dmax, PTV dose conformity (Van't Riet conformation number (CN)), mean lung dose, lung V20 and V5, liver V30, and Dmax to the spinal canal prv3mm. Also examined were the total plan monitor units (MUs) and the beam delivery time. Equivalent target coverage was observed with both VMAT single and two‐arc plans. The comparison of VMATI with fixed‐field IMRT demonstrated equivalent target coverage; statistically no significant difference were found in PTV D99 (p=0.47), PTV mean (p=0.12), PTV D95 and PTV V9547.5Gy (95%) (p=0.38). However, Dmax in VMATI plans was significantly lower compared to IMRT (p=0.02). The Van't Riet dose conformation number (CN) was also statistically in favor of VMATI plans (p=0.04). VMATI achieved lower lung V20 (p=0.05), whereas lung V5 (p=0.35) and mean lung dose (p=0.62) were not significantly different. The other OARs, including spinal canal, liver, heart, and kidneys showed no statistically significant differences between the two techniques. Treatment time delivery for VMATI plans was reduced by up to 55% (p=5.8E−10) and MUs reduced by up to 16% (p=0.001). Integral dose was not statistically different between the two planning techniques (p=0.99). There were no statistically significant differences found in dose distribution of the two VMAT techniques (VMATI vs. VMATII) Dose statistics for both VMAT techniques were: PTV D99 (p=0.76), PTV D95 (p=0.95), mean PTV dose (p=0.78), conformation number (CN) (p=0.26), and MUs (p=0.1). However, the treatment delivery time for VMATII increased significantly by two‐fold (p=3.0E−11) compared to VMATI. VMAT‐based treatment planning is safe and deliverable for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer with similar planning goals, when compared to standard IMRT. The key benefit for VMATI was the reduction in treatment delivery time and MUs, and improvement in dose conformality. In our study, we found no significant difference in VMATII over single‐arc VMATI for PTV coverage or OARs doses. However, we observed significant increase in delivery time for VMATII compared to VMATI.

PACS number: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.‐x

Radiation Therapy and Esophageal Cancer

Background

Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma account for more than 90% of all esophageal cancer cases. Although the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma has declined, the incidence of adenocarcinoma has risen due to increases in obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Methods

The authors examine the role of radiation therapy alone (external beam and brachytherapy) for the management of esophageal cancer or combined with other modalities. The impact on staging and appropriate stratification of patients referred for curative vs palliative intent with modalities is reviewed. The authors also explore the role of emerging radiation technologies.

Results

Current data show that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection is the accepted standard of care, with 3-year overall survival rates ranging from 30% to 60%. The benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy is limited to patients with node-positive cancer. The survival benefit of surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy remains controversial. External beam radiation therapy alone results in few long-term survivors and is considered palliative at best. Radiation dose-escalation has failed to improve local control or survival. Brachytherapy can provide better long-term palliation of dysphagia than metal stent placement. Although three-dimensional conformal treatment planning is the accepted standard, the roles of IMRT and proton therapy are evolving and potentially reduce adverse events due to better sparing of normal tissue.

Conclusions

Future directions will evaluate the benefit of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy, the role of surgery in locally advanced disease, and the identification of responders prior to treatment based on microarray analysis.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

Radiation therapy plays an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Radiation therapy may be combined with chemotherapy, used as a component of induction therapy, used in the adjuvant setting, or used for palliation of advanced disease. Chemotherapy is also occasionally used as a solitary treatment modality for patients with esophageal cancer. Current treatment protocols include multiple agents, and agents directed against specific molecular targets have been investigated in clinical trials. This article discusses future directions related to the selection of radiation treatment protocols, novel targeted chemotherapeutic agents, and the selection of patients for surgery.

Detection of esophageal fiducial marker displacement during radiation therapy with a 2-dimensional on-board imager: analysis of internal margin for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To quantify the interfraction displacement of esophageal fiducial markers for primary esophageal cancer radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Orthogonal 2-dimensional (2D) matching records fused to vertebrae were analyzed in clinically staged T1/2N0 esophageal cancer patients undergoing endoscopic clipping as fiducial metal markers. Displacement of the markers between the digitally reconstructed radiographs and on-board kilovoltage images during radiation therapy was analyzed according to direction and esophageal site.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients, with 81 markers (10 proximal, 42 middle, and 29 distal), underwent 367 2D matching sessions during radiation therapy. The mean (SD) absolute marker displacement was 0.26 (0.30) cm in the right-left (RL), 0.50 (0.39) cm in the superior-inferior (SI), and 0.24 (0.21) cm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction. Displacement was significantly larger in the SI than in the RL and AP directions (P<.0001). In the SI direction, mean absolute displacements of the distal, middle, and proximal esophagus were 0.67 (0.45) cm, 0.42 (0.32) cm, and 0.36 (0.30) cm, respectively. Distal esophagus displacement was significantly larger than those of the middle and proximal esophagus (P<.0001). The estimated internal margin to cover 95% of the cases was 0.75 cm in the RL and AP directions. In the SI direction, the margin was 1.25 cm for the proximal and middle esophagus and 1.75 cm for the distal esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of interfraction displacement of esophageal clips was larger in the SI direction, particularly in the distal esophagus, but substantial displacement was observed in other directions and at other esophageal sites. It is practical to take estimated movements into account with internal margins, even if vertebrae-based 2D matching is performed.