Post-operative Pelvic Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) with Chemotherapy for Patients with Cervical Carcinoma/RTOG 0418 Phase II Study

The role of intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecological radiotherapy: Present and future

AIM

This manuscript reviews the English language literature on the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gynecologic malignancies, focusing on the treatment cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy plays a key role in both definitive and adjuvant treatment of these patients, although efforts continue to minimize acute and chronic toxicity. IMRT is an attractive option because of the potential to dose escalate to the target while sparing organs at risk.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The English language literature was reviewed for relevant studies.

RESULTS

Multiple heterogeneous studies have showed dosimetric and clinical benefits with reduction in acute and late gastrointestinal, genitourinary and hematologic toxicity, especially in the post hysterectomy scenario and for dose escalation to para-aortic nodes. Consensus is evolving regarding necessary margins and target delineation in the context of organ movement and tumor shrinkage during the course of radiotherapy. Protocols with daily soft-tissue visualization are being investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistency in approach and reporting are vital in order to acquire the data to justify the considerable increased expense of IMRT.

A dosimetric analysis of tomotherapy based intensity modulated radiation therapy with and without bone marrow sparing in gynecologic malignancies

Whole pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Published literature reports that the pelvic bone marrow (BM) dosimetric parameters of V10 > 90% and V20 > 80% are associated with higher rates of hematologic toxicities using this approach. Here, we investigate the ability of Tomotherapy based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to reduce dose to pelvic BM while evaluating dose distribution to critical structures and planning target volume (PTV) coverage. Ten patients were selected for analysis. Normal structures, whole pelvic BM, PTV contours, and IMRT objects were standardized. Two whole pelvis Tomotherapy plans were created for each patient, one standard plan, and one with the addition of a BM sparing (BMS) constraint (V10 <85%, V20 < 80%). Data were calculated from multiple points with regard to BM dose, normal structure dose, and PTV coverage. Differences in dose distributions between the two sets of plans were analyzed using a paired t-test. The addition of a BMS planning constraint resulted in significant decreases in pelvic BM dose at the following dosimetric points: V5, V10, V15, V20, V30, V40, V50, and mean dose (p < 0.05 for all points). There were no significant differences in dose to small bowel, bladder or rectum, with the exception of one data point (small bowel V30, p = 0.004) between the two sets of plans. There was no sacrifice of PTV coverage or loss of homogeneity with the addition of a BMS planning constraint. BMS-IMRT significantly reduces radiation dose to the pelvic BM while maintaining the ability to spare dose to the small bowel, bladder and rectum. The planning constraints were met without violation of study criteria, and without sacrifice of PTV coverage. Further investigation is warranted to determine if rates of hematologic toxicity improve with utilization of Tomotherapy based BMS-IMRT.

Clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated pelvic radiation therapy for carcinoma of the cervix

PURPOSE

To evaluate disease outcomes and toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We included all patients with Stage I-IVA cervical carcinoma treated with IMRT at three different institutions from 2000-2007. Patients treated with extended field or conventional techniques were excluded. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans were designed to deliver 45 Gy in 1.8-Gy daily fractions to the planning target volume while minimizing dose to the bowel, bladder, and rectum. Toxicity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group system. Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Pelvic failure, distant failure, and late toxicity were estimated by use of cumulative incidence functions.

RESULTS

The study included 111 patients. Of these, 22 were treated with postoperative IMRT, 8 with IMRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy and adjuvant hysterectomy, and 81 with IMRT followed by planned intracavitary brachytherapy. Of the patients, 63 had Stage I-IIA disease and 48 had Stage IIB-IVA disease. The median follow-up time was 27 months. The 3-year overall survival rate and the disease-free survival rate were 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68-88%) and 69% (95% CI, 59-81%), respectively. The 3-year pelvic failure rate and the distant failure rate were 14% (95% CI, 6-22%) and 17% (95% CI, 8-25%), respectively. Estimates of acute and late Grade 3 toxicity or higher were 2% (95% CI, 0-7%) and 7% (95% CI, 2-13%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is associated with low toxicity and favorable outcomes, supporting its safety and efficacy for cervical cancer. Prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of IMRT vs. conventional techniques.