Atypical Meningioma: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Atypical Meningiomas: Histologic and Clinical Factors Associated With Recurrence

BACKGROUND

Atypical meningioma is a heterogeneous group of tumors with an unpredictable behavior. Our objectives were to study patients with atypical meningioma, monitor their follow-up, identify the histologic characteristics, and analyze factors associated with severe outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 28 patients with atypical meningioma from 1994 to 2014. The histologic samples were reviewed under current criteria. The association with recurrence and survival was analyzed statistically for clinical, therapeutic, histologic, and molecular factors.

RESULTS

The average age at the time of diagnosis was 55.5 years (range, 18-83 years) and 57% were female. Total resection (Simpson grade I) was performed in 10 cases (38%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to 13 patients. During the 77-month follow-up, 64% had a recurrence or progression. The average time to first recurrence and overall survival were 43.83 months and 149 months, respectively. Recurrence was found in 85% of the patients whose samples presented necrosis. Of the tumors, 84% showed a high mitotic index (4-20 mitoses/10 high-power field). Of the 4 patients with a low mitotic index (<4 mitoses/10 high-power field), the degree of resection was subtotal and 3 experienced disease progression. Of patients with Ki67 >9.9%, 67% had recurrence. The degree of resection was the only variable significantly associated with tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The high rate of recurrence observed and the short disease-free survival exemplify the unpredictable behavior of atypical meningiomas. Total resection was the only significant factor associated with recurrence. However, the presence of atypical features, such as necrosis or high Ki67, is frequent in patients with disease progression.

Histopathological features predictive of local control of atypical meningioma after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy

OBEJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on local recurrence and overall survival in patients undergoing primary resection of atypical meningioma, and to identify predictive factors to inform patient selection for adjuvant RT.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-two patients who underwent primary resection of atypical meningioma at a single institution between 1993 and 2014 were retrospectively identified. Patient, meningioma, and treatment data were extracted from the medical record and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, multivariate analysis (MVA) Cox proportional hazards models with relative risk (RR), and recursive partitioning analysis.

RESULTS

The median patient age and imaging follow-up were 57 years (interquartile range [IQR] 45–67 years) and 4.4 years (IQR 1.8–7.5 years), respectively. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 114 cases (63%), and 42 patients (23%) received adjuvant RT. On MVA, prognostic factors for death from any cause included GTR (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1–0.9, p = 0.02) and MIB1 labeling index (LI) ≤ 7% (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1–0.9, p = 0.04). Prognostic factors on MVA for local progression included GTR (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.5, p = 0.002), adjuvant RT (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.4, p < 0.001), MIB1 LI ≤ 7% (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.5, p < 0.001), and a remote history of prior cranial RT (RR 5.7, 95% CI 1.3–18.8, p = 0.03). After GTR, adjuvant RT (0 of 10 meningiomas recurred, p = 0.01) and MIB1 LI ≤ 7% (RR 0.1, 95% CI 0.003–0.3, p < 0.001) were predictive for local progression on MVA. After GTR, 2.2% of meningiomas with MIB1 LI ≤ 7% recurred (1 of 45), compared with 38% with MIB1 LI > 7% (13 of 34; p < 0.001). Recursive partitioning analysis confirmed the existence of a cohort of patients at high risk of local progression after GTR without adjuvant RT, with MIB1 LI > 7%, and evidence of brain or bone invasion. After subtotal resection, adjuvant RT (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.04–0.7, p = 0.009) and ≤ 5 mitoses per 10 hpf (RR 0.1, 95% CI 0.03–0.4, p = 0.002) were predictive on MVA for local progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT improves local control of atypical meningioma irrespective of extent of resection. Although independent validation is required, the authors’ results suggest that MIB1 LI, the number of mitoses per 10 hpf, and brain or bone invasion may be useful guides to the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from adjuvant RT after resection of atypical meningioma.

Salvage therapy outcomes for atypical meningioma

Atypical menginomas demonstrate increased clinical aggressiveness characterized by recurrence and diminished survival. The optimal management of atypical meningioma in the recurrent setting is especially not well defined. To characterize outcomes following salvage treatment of recurrent atypical meningioma and to identify risk factors for further recurrence. Retrospective chart review was performed on 65 patients who underwent salvage treatment of atypical meningioma at a single institution. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Sixty-five patients with recurrent atypical meningioma and median imaging follow-up of 4.0 years (range 1.9-6.6 years) underwent 62 surgeries and 114 radiation treatments (RT) for salvage therapy. Salvage modality was surgery (21%), surgery/RT (25%), or RT alone (54%), associated with 2 year local freedom from recurrence (LFFR) of 36, 59, and 73%, respectively (P = 0.01). Twenty percent of patients experienced CTCAE grade ≥ 3 toxicity with salvage therapy. Thirty-nine percent of patients experienced ≥ 3 recurrences. The median disease-free survival intervals after first and second salvage treatments were 2.9 and 1.3 years, respectively. On univariate Cox analysis, prior subtotal resection, prior RT, tumor diameter > 2.5 cm, and multifocal local recurrence were associated with recurrence after salvage therapy. On multivariate logistic regression, only multifocal local recurrence was associated with further recurrence. Recurrent atypical meningioma is clinically and pathologically more aggressive than primary atypical meningioma, and the likelihood of durable local control with salvage therapy is lower. Future efforts should identify patients at risk of recurrence, and aggressive upfront treatment should be employed.

Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review

Evolving interest in meningioma, the most common primary brain tumor, has refined contemporary management of these tumors. Problematic, however, is the paucity of prospective clinical trials that provide an evidence-based algorithm for managing meningioma. This review summarizes the published literature regarding the treatment of newly diagnosed and recurrent meningioma, with an emphasis on outcomes stratified by WHO tumor grade. Specifically, this review focuses on patient outcomes following treatment (either adjuvant or at recurrence) with surgery or radiation therapy inclusive of radiosurgery and fractionated radiation therapy. Phase II trials for patients with meningioma have recently completed accrual within the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consortia, and Phase III studies are being developed. However, at present, there are no completed prospective, randomized trials assessing the role of either surgery or radiation therapy. Successful completion of future studies will require a multidisciplinary effort, dissemination of the current knowledge base, improved implementation of WHO grading criteria, standardization of response criteria and other outcome end points, and concerted efforts to address weaknesses in present treatment paradigms, particularly for patients with progressive or recurrent low-grade meningioma or with high-grade meningioma. In parallel efforts, Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) subcommittees are developing a paper on systemic therapies for meningioma and a separate article proposing standardized end point and response criteria for meningioma.

Does adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy improve outcomes for nonbenign meningiomas? A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–based analysis

Object

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of postoperative external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) on disease-specific survival in patients with nonbenign meningiomas.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1988 to 2007 was queried for cases of resected Grades II (atypical) and III (malignant) meningioma. Disease-specific survival outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the likelihood of receiving EBRT for Grade II versus Grade III. Because atypical and malignant meningiomas underwent WHO reclassification in 2000, the authors carried out an additional analysis of outcomes of these tumors from 2000 to 2008.

Results

There were 657 patients included in the analysis; of these, 244 received adjuvant radiation. Compared with patients with Grade II meningioma, patients with Grade III disease were 41.9% more likely to receive EBRT after gross-total resection and 36.7% more likely to receive it after subtotal resection (95% CI 0.58–3.26). Controlling for grade, extent of resection, size and anatomical location of the tumor, year of diagnosis, race, age, and sex, adjuvant EBRT did not impart a survival benefit (HR 1.492; 95% CI 0.827–2.692). There was also no survival advantage to EBRT in an analysis of cases diagnosed after the WHO 2000 reclassification of meningiomas (HR 0.828; 95% CI 0.350–1.961).

Conclusions

The results of this population-based retrospective analysis demonstrate that the role of radiation remains unclear. They underscore the need for randomized prospective clinical trials to assess the usefulness of adjuvant EBRT in Grades II and III meningioma so as to define more precisely the subset of patients who may benefit from the addition of adjuvant radiation.

Intracranial meningiomas of atypical (WHO grade II) histology

Atypical (WHO grade II) meningiomas occupy an intermediate risk group between benign (WHO grade I) and anaplastic (WHO grade III) meningiomas. Although grade II meningiomas have traditionally been recognized in only about 5% of cases, after changes in diagnostic criteria with the current 2007 WHO standards, they now comprise approximately 20-35% of all meningiomas. Given the magnitude of this change, much work is now needed to solidify the adoption of these standards, to render inter-observer and inter-institutional comparisons more uniform, and to more carefully define the incidence of grade II histology. However, it is clear that they carry a several-fold increased risk of recurrence, as well as an increased rate of mortality. We will discuss the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with atypical meningioma; review the current phase II cooperative trials; and draw attention to some questions timely for pre-clinical and clinical research.