Management of inflammatory breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Radiotherapy in the Management of Non-Metastatic Inflammatory Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Observational Study

(1) Background: Inflammatory breast cancers (IBC) are characterized by a poor prognosis. This retrospective study aims to describe the clinical outcomes of non-metastatic IBC patients treated with a multidisciplinary approach with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. (2) Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all women patients diagnosed with non-metastatic IBC between January 2010 and January 2018 at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional free survival (LRRFS) were calculated from the time of diagnosis. Prognostic factors for patient survival were analyzed based on univariate and multivariate regressions. (3) Results: We identified 113 patients with a median age of 51 years. 79.7% had node-positive tumors; triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) represented 34.6% of the cases. A large majority of patients (91.2%) received adjuvant post-mastectomy while ten patients (8.8%) received preoperative radiotherapy. Non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) was observed in 67.3% of patients. Radiotherapy delivered a median dose of 50 Gy to the breast or the chest wall in 25 fractions. With a median follow-up of 54 months, 5-year OS, DFS and LRRFS were 78% (CI: 70.1-86.8%), 68.1% (59.6-77.7%), and 85.2% (78.4-92.7%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, non-pCR was an adverse prognosis factor for OS, DFS, and LRRFS; pre-operative radiotherapy was an adverse prognosis factor for OS and DFS. Radiation-related adverse events were limited to acute skin toxicity (22% of Grade 2 and 2% of grade 3 dermatitis); no late radiation-induced toxicity was reported. (4) Conclusions: High locoregional control could be achieved with multidisciplinary management of non-metastatic IBC, suggesting the anti-tumor efficacy of radiotherapy in this rare but pejorative clinicopathological presentation. While comparing favorably with historical cohorts, OS and DFS could be potentially improved in the future with the use of new systemic treatments, such as PARP-inhibitors or immunotherapy.

Risk factors and prognostic factors for inflammatory breast cancer with bone metastasis: A population-based study

PURPOSE

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare type of breast cancer with poor prognosis. IBC patients with bone metastasis (BM) often suffer from many complications. This study was performed to identify risk factors with strong capability of predicting high BM risk for IBC patients and find prognostic factors for those patients.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to collect the clinicopathological and survival information of IBC patients. 966 IBC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were included to study the risk factors for developing BM by using Multivariable logistic regression. A total of 194 and 176 patients were included to analyze independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) of IBC patients with BM respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 966 IBC patients, 194 (20.1%) patients were with BM. The risk factors for developing BM in IBC patients included unmarried marital status, double breast tumor, N1 stage, N3 stage, and liver metastases had higher risk of BM, while those of uninsured status and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were less likely to have BM. Analysis of prognostic factors for OS and CSS of IBC patients with BM showed that TNBC subtype and liver metastases were independently significantly associated with poorer OS and CSS of BM patients, while chemotherapy could serve as an independent prognostic factor for better OS and CSS of BM patients.

CONCLUSION

Marital status, double breast tumor, N1 stage, N3 stage, and liver metastases should be considered for prediction of BM in IBC patients. TNBC subtype and liver metastases may indicate poor survival and chemotherapy can indicate improved survival for IBC patients with BM.

Pattern of distant metastases in inflammatory breast cancer - A large-cohort retrospective study

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a fatal form of breast cancer. IBC patients present with unfavorable prognosis mainly attributable to high risk of distant metastasis. Thus, in this cohort study, we aimed to explore metastatic profiles of different molecular subtypes of IBC and elucidate the clinical and prognostic characteristics among different metastatic sites. Patients diagnosed as IBC between 2010 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Chi-square tests were performed to compare metastatic distribution among different molecular subtypes. We further used odds ratio calculation to analyze the combined metastatic patterns. Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariate Cox regression models were applied to analyze survival data among different metastatic organs. In total, we enrolled 635 IBC patients between 2010 and 2014 as the training cohort and 242 IBC patients between 2015 and 2016 as the validation cohort, All the included patients were recorded with known metastatic status, follow-up data and molecular subtype. In the present study, we elaborated the following three points: (1) Elucidating the distribution of single-organ metastases in IBC. Bone and brain were the most and least common metastatic lesions for all subtypes of IBC, separately. (2) Clarifying the combined metastatic patterns and tendency of co-metastases. Bi-organ metastasis occurred most frequently among all combined metastases. Several combinations, such as liver and bone, lung and brain, were preferential for bi-organ metastasis. (3) Analyzing prognostic values of single-organ and bi-organ metastases. All single-organ distal metastases were independent risk factors indicating an unfavorable prognosis. In conclusion, our results would provide more information for clinical decision and future studies.

Inflammatory breast cancer: A review from our experience

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a distinct and rare type of breast cancer accounting for up to 6% of all breast cancer cases in Europe. The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcome after IBC in patients treated at a single institution in Denmark.

METHOD

All patients treated for IBC at Aarhus University Hospital between 2000 and 2014 were identified and included in the cohort. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients were identified with a median follow up of 3.6 years. The overall survival at 5 and 10 years were 41% and 18%, respectively. The disease free survival at 5 and 10 years were 47% and 27%, respectively. Thirty-four percent had distant metastasis at time of diagnosis. Patients with ER positive tumors had a significantly better overall survival than patients with ER negative tumors (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Despite a more aggressive systemic and loco-regional treatment today, IBC is still a very serious disease with a high mortality.

Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) and Survival of Women with Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC): An Analysis Based on Biologic Subtypes and Demographic Characteristics

In this US-based study of the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we examined 8550 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic, invasive inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) who received surgery from 2004–2013. Patients were grouped into four biologic subtypes (HR⁺/HER_2⁻, HR⁺/HER_2⁺, HR⁻/HER_2⁺, HR⁻/HER_2⁻). On average, women were 56 years of age at diagnosis and were followed for a median of 3.7 years. The majority were white (80%), had private health insurance (50%), and presented with poorly differentiated tumors (57%). Approximately 46% of the cancers were >5 cm. Most patients underwent mastectomy (94%) and received radiotherapy (71%). Differences by biologic subtypes were observed for grade, lymph node invasion, race, and tumor size (p < 0.0001). Patients experiencing pathologic complete response (pCR, 12%) vs. non-pCR had superior 5-year overall survival (OS) (77% vs. 54%) (p < 0.0001). Survival was poor for triple-negative (TN) tumors (37%) vs. other biologic subtypes (60%) (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, TN-IBC, positive margins, and not receiving either chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or radiotherapy were independently associated with poor 5-year survival (p < 0.0001). In this analysis of IBC, categorized by biologic subtypes, we observed significant differential tumor, patient and treatment characteristics, and OS.

Vinorelbine's anti-tumor actions may depend on the mitotic apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation: hypotheses with implications for chemo-immunotherapy of advanced cancers and pediatric gliomas

Vinorelbine is a very potent chemotherapeutic agent which is used to treat a number of cancers including breast and non-small cell lung tumors. Vinorelbine mainly acts via blocking microtubules and induces a specific type of cell death called 'mitotic catastrophe/apoptosis' subsequent to mitotic slippage, which is the failure of cells to stay in a mitotic arrested state and replicating their DNA without cytokinesis. Glial tumor cells are especially sensitive to mitotic slippage. In recent years, vinorelbine demonstrated potency in pediatric optic and pontine gliomas. In this manuscript, we propose that vinorelbine's anti-tumor actions involve mitotic apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation. Intravenous infusion of vinorelbine induces a peculiar severe pain in the tumor site and patients with highly vascularized, oedematous and necrotic tumors are particularly vulnerable to this pain. Severe pain is a sign of robust inflammation and anti-inflammatory agents are used in treatment of this side effect. However, no one has questioned whether inflammation contributes to anti-tumor effects of vinorelbine, despite the existing data that vinorelbine induces Toll-Like Receptor-4 (TLR4), cytokines and cell death in endothelial cells especially under hypoxia. Robust inflammation may contribute to tumor necrosis such as seen during immunotherapy with lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Evidence also emerges that enhanced cyclooxygenase activity may increase cancer cell death in certain contexts. There are data indicating that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) could block anti-tumor efficacy of taxanes, which also work mainly via anti-microtubule actions. Further, combining vinorelbine with immunostimulant cytokines provided encouraging results in far advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, which are highly antigenic tumors. Vinorelbine also showed potential in treatment of inflammatory breast cancer. Finally, pontine gliomas - where partial activity of vinorelbine is shown by some studies - are also tumors which partially respond to immune stimulation. Animal experiments shall be conducted whether TLR4-activating molecules or immune-checkpoint inhibitors could augment anti-tumor actions of vinorelbine. Noteworthy, TLR4-activation seems as the most promising way of cancer immunotherapy, as a high percentage of molecules which demonstrated clinical benefits in cancer treatment are activators of TLR4, including BCG vaccine, monophosphoryl lipid A and picibanil (OKT-432). The provided data would be meaningful for the oncological practice.

Immediate breast reconstruction for women having inflammatory breast cancer in the United States

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive malignancy having a poor prognosis. Traditionally, reconstruction is not offered due to concerns about treatment delay, margin positivity, recurrence, and poor long-term survival. There is a paucity of literature, however, evaluating whether immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is associated with greater mortality in patients with IBC. A population-based study was conducted via the SEER-Medicare-linked database (1991-2009). Female patients greater than 65 years were reviewed who had mastectomy and reconstruction claims for nonmetastatic IBC. Competing risk and Cox regression were used to assess whether IBR was associated with higher breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) or overall mortality (OM). Among 552 936 patients, 1472 (median age 74 years) were diagnosed with IBC and had a mastectomy. Forty-four patients (3%) underwent IBR. Younger age, a lower Charlson comorbidity score, and a greater median income were predictors of IBR use. Tumor grade, hormone receptor status, and lymph node status were independent predictors of adjusted OM and BCSM. There was no difference by IBR status in BCSM or covariate-adjusted BCSM (sHR 1.04; CI 0.71-1.54; P = .83 and sHR 1.13; CI 0.84-1.93; P = .58, respectively). Cumulative incidence of OM was lower among IR patients (P = .013), and IR did not influence the cumulative incidence of BCSM (P = .91). IBR was not associated with increased overall and BCSM mortality. Although further study of IBR in the IBC setting may be of value, these data suggest that IBC should not be considered an absolute contraindication to IBR.

Challenging a Misnomer? The Role of Inflammatory Pathways in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer is a rare, yet highly aggressive form of breast cancer, which accounts for less than 5% of all locally advanced presentations. The clinical presentation of inflammatory breast cancer often differs significantly from that of noninflammatory breast cancer; however, immunohistochemistry reveals few, if any, distinguishing features. The more aggressive triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer subtypes are overrepresented in inflammatory breast cancer compared with noninflammatory breast cancer, with a poorer prognosis in response to conventional therapies. Despite its name, there remains some controversy regarding the role of inflammation in inflammatory breast cancer. This review summarises the current molecular evidence suggesting that inflammatory signaling pathways are upregulated in this disease, including NF-κB activation and excessive IL-6 production among others, which may provide an avenue for novel therapeutics. The role of the tumor microenvironment, through tumor-associated macrophages, infiltrating lymphocytes, and cancer stem cells is also discussed, suggesting that these tumor extrinsic factors may help account for the differences in behavior between inflammatory breast cancer and noninflammatory breast cancer. While there are various novel treatment strategies already underway in clinical trials, the need for further development of preclinical models of this rare but aggressive disease is paramount.

Elevated expression of chemokine C-C ligand 2 in stroma is associated with recurrent basal-like breast cancers

Despite advances in treatment, up to 30% of breast cancer patients experience disease recurrence accompanied by more aggressive disease and poorer prognosis. Treatment of breast cancer is complicated by the presence of multiple breast cancer subtypes, including: luminal, Her2 overexpressing, and aggressive basal-like breast cancers. Identifying new biomarkers specific to breast cancer subtypes could enhance the prediction of patient prognosis and contribute to improved treatment strategies. The microenvironment influences breast cancer progression through expression of growth factors, angiogenic factors and other soluble proteins. In particular, chemokine C-C ligand 2 (CCL2) regulates macrophage recruitment to primary tumors and signals to cancer cells to promote breast tumor progression. Here we employed a software-based approach to evaluate the prognostic significance of CCL2 protein expression in breast cancer subtypes in relation to its expression in the epithelium or stroma or in relation to fibroblast-specific protein 1 (Fsp1), a mesenchymal marker. Immunohistochemistry analysis of tissue microarrays revealed that CCL2 significantly correlated with Fsp1 expression in the stroma and tumor epithelium of invasive ductal carcinoma. In the overall cohort of invasive ductal carcinomas (n=427), CCL2 and Fsp1 expression in whole tissues, stroma and epithelium were inversely associated with cancer stage and tumor size. When factoring in molecular subtype, stromal CCL2 was observed to be most highly expressed in basal-like breast cancers. By Cox regression modeling, stromal CCL2, but not epithelial CCL2, expression was significantly associated with decreased recurrence-free survival. Furthermore, stromal CCL2 (HR=7.51 P=0.007) was associated with a greater hazard than cancer stage (HR=2.45, P=0.048) in multivariate analysis. These studies indicate that stromal CCL2 is associated with decreased recurrence-free survival in patients with basal-like breast cancer, with important implications on the use of stromal markers for predicting patient prognosis.

[Salvage concomitant chemoradiation therapy for non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer after chemotherapy failure]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgical possibility following concomitant chemoradiotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer, after unsucessful neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data from ten patients with inflammatory breast cancer treated between 1996 and 2010 by concomitant chemoradiotherapy after unsucessful neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analysed. All patients had an invasive carcinoma. All patients received a neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including anthracyclin, six patients received taxan and one received trastuzumab. Radiotherapy was delivered to the breast and regional lymph nodes in all patients at a dose of 50Gy; a boost of 20Gy was delivered to one patient. Concomitant chemotherapy was based on weekly cisplatin for six patients, on cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil the first and last weeks of radiotherapy for four patients.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for all patients was 44 months. Mastectomy was performed in nine patients. Two- and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 70 % and 60 %. Median local recurrence delay was 5 months; six patients died (all from cancer), seven developped metastasis. Grade 1 and 2 epithelite was respectively observed in six and two patients, grade 2 renal toxicity in three patients, grade 2 neutropenia in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer after unsucessful neoadjuvant chemotherapy may control the disease in some patients and lead to mastectomy. These results have to be confirmed through a multicentric study with more patients.

Synthesis and Investigation of Novel Spiro-isoxazolines as Anti-Cancer Agents

A series of structurally diverse 4-bromo spiro-isoxazolines possessing a variety of aromatic and aliphatic substituents at the 3 position, were synthesized through a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition followed by intramolecular cyclization of a pendant hydroxyl or carboxylic acid group. The biochemical antiproliferative activity was evaluated in vitro by using two breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) and two prostate cancer cell lines (PC-3 and DU-145) using the MTT viability assay, and the IC50 values were obtained. Spiro-isoxazoline derivatives bearing a p-chloro or an o-dichloro aromatic substituent at the 3-position of the isoxazoline showed considerable antitumor activities in all four cell lines with IC50 value ranging from 43μM to 56μM.

Inflammatory breast cancer: an overview

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive entity of breast cancer. Management involves coordination of multidisciplinary management and usually includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, ablative surgery if a tumor-free resection margin is expected and locoregional radiotherapy. This multimodal therapeutic approach has significantly improved patient survival. However, the median overall survival among women with IBC is still poor. By elucidating the biologic characteristics of IBC, new treatment options may become available. We performed a comprehensive review of the English-language literature on IBC through computerized literature searches. The objective of the current review is to present an overview of the literature related to the biology, imaging and multidisciplinary treatment of inflammatory breast cancer.

Primary tumor resection as a component of multimodality treatment may improve local control and survival in patients with stage IV inflammatory breast cancer

BACKGROUND

To the authors' knowledge, the benefit of primary tumor resection among patients with metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is unknown.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 172 cases of metastatic IBC. All patients received chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy and/or surgery. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders to chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and distant progression-free survival (DPFS) and local control at the time of last follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients (46%) underwent surgery. OS and DPFS were better among patients treated with surgery versus no surgery (47% vs 10%, respectively [P<.0001] and 30% vs 3%, respectively [P<.0001]). Surgery plus radiotherapy was associated with better survival compared with treatment with surgery or radiotherapy alone (OS rate: 50% vs 25% vs 14%, respectively; DPFS rate: 32% vs 18% vs 15%, respectively [P<.0001 for both]). Surgery was associated with better survival for both responders (OS rate for surgery vs no surgery: 49% vs 23% [P<.0001] and DPFS rate for surgery vs no surgery: 31% vs 8% [P<.0001]) and nonresponders (OS rate for surgery vs no surgery: 40% vs 6% [P<.0001] and DPFS rate for surgery vs no surgery: 30% vs 0% [P<.0001]). On multivariate analysis, treatment with surgery plus radiotherapy and response to chemotherapy were found to be significant predictors of better OS and DPFS. Local control at the time of last follow-up was 4-fold more likely in patients who underwent surgery with or without radiotherapy compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone (81% vs 18%; P<.0001). Surgery and response to chemotherapy independently predicted local control on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrate that for select patients with metastatic IBC, multimodality treatment including primary tumor resection may result in better local control and survival. However, a randomized trial is needed to validate these findings.

Axillary vein thrombosis as the first clinical manifestation of inflammatory breast cancer: report of a case

Inflammatory breast cancer is a rare and aggressive form of breast cancer. Venous thromboembolism is often related to cancer conditions but this report presents a case in which the thromboembolic event predicted the diagnosis of cancer. A 48-year-old female was admitted with the evidence of acute right axillary vein thrombosis. There was also erythema and edema of the skin of the right breast. Further evidence revealed a case of inflammatory breast cancer. The patient underwent anticoagulant therapy, and neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy was initiated. The patient underwent extensive unilateral mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Follow-up (after 2 months of anticoagulation therapy for deep vein thrombosis) revealed recanalization of the right axillary vein, without evidence of residual thrombus. A case of acute vein thrombosis as the first manifestation of breast cancer may delay the diagnosis and subsequent appropriate treatment.

Management of inflammatory breast cancer: focus on radiotherapy with an evidence-based approach

Inflammatory breast cancer represents a rare and extremely aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Due to its rarity, prospective studies are a difficult goal to obtain in this field. Nowadays a multimodal approach seems to be the standard approach. Role and timing of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are still debated issues. In this scenario interest is rising in molecular and target therapies. We performed a review analyzing the management of this unfavorable disease focusing on the role of radiotherapy, with particular emphasis on levels of evidence.

Primary chemo-radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The best management of large, diffuse or inflammatory breast cancers is uncertain and the place of radiotherapy and/or surgery is not clearly defined.

METHODS

A cohort of 123 patients with non-metastatic locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer 3 cm or more in diameter or T4, was treated between 1989 and 2006. All patients received primary chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, 40 Gy in 15 fractions with 10 Gy boost. Patients with ER positive tumours received Tamoxifen. Assessment was carried out 8 weeks post-treatment and surgery was reserved for residual or recurrent disease.

RESULTS

For each stage there were T2/3: 63, T4b: 31 and T4d: 29 patients. 80 had complete clinical response (65%) but 18 patients were never free of inoperable local disease. 25 patients had residual operable disease at assessment and 12 patients who initially had a complete response developed operable local recurrence (LR). 37 Patients (30%) had surgery at a mean of 15 months post diagnosis. At 5 years, overall survival (OS) of the two surgical groups was not significantly different from those 68 patients who had complete remission without surgery, p=0.218, HR 1.46 (0.80-2.55). Surgery as an independent variable to predict survival was not significant on a Cox proportional hazards model (p=0.97). LR in the surgical groups was 13.5% vs 17.5% in the non-surgical patients. The median OS was 64.5 months and disease-free survival (DFS) was 52.5 months. 5-Year OS was 54% and DFS survival 43%.

CONCLUSION

In patients with a complete or partial response to chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer, reserving surgery for those with residual or recurrent local disease did not appear to compromise survival. This finding would support examination of this treatment strategy by a randomised controlled trial.