Impact of Neoadjuvant Radiation on Survival in Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Immunologic Consequences of Sequencing Cancer Radiotherapy and Surgery

PURPOSE

Early-stage cancers are routinely treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy (SR). Radiotherapy before surgery (RS) has been widely ignored for some cancers. We evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) with SR and RS for different cancer types and simulate the plausibility of RS- and SR-induced antitumor immunity contributing to outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed a SEER data set of early-stage cancers treated with SR or RS. OS and DFS were calculated for cancers with sufficient numbers for statistical power (cancers of lung and bronchus, esophagus, rectum, cervix uteri, corpus uteri, and breast). We simulated the immunologic consequences of SR, RS, and radiotherapy alone in a mathematical model of tumor-immune interactions.

RESULTS

RS improved OS for cancers with low 20-year survival rates (lung: hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; P = .046) and improved DFS for cancers with higher survival (breast: HR = 0.64; P < .001). For rectal cancer, with intermediate 20-year survival, RS improved both OS (HR = 0.89; P = .006) and DFS (HR = 0.86; P = .04). Model simulations suggested that RS could increase OS by eliminating cancer for a broader range of model parameters and radiotherapy-induced antitumor immunity compared with SR for selected parameter combinations. This could create an immune memory that may explain increased DFS after RS for certain cancers.

CONCLUSION

Study results suggest plausibility that radiation to the bulk of the tumor could induce a more robust immune response and better harness the synergy of radiotherapy and antitumor immunity than postsurgical radiation to the tumor bed. This exploratory study provides motivation for prospective evaluation of immune activation of RS versus SR in controlled clinical studies.

The effect of tumor laterality on survival for non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy

Background: The treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) in good performance status is definitive radiotherapy (RT), the five-year survival being approximately 25-30%. Advances in the diagnostic procedures and treatment modalities in NSCLC have increased the overall survival, making identifying factors with impact on survival increasingly relevant. Recent research indicates that tumor laterality has impact on the survival of patients with LA-NSCLC treated with definitive RT. The aim of this study was to investigate whether tumor laterality impacted overall survival. Material and methods: All patients with stage IIa-IIIb NSCLC planned for curative intended RT from 2008 to 2013 at Odense University Hospital were analyzed to compare overall survival of patients with right-sided vs. left-sided tumors. Log-rank test was performed to test for differences in survival rates and Cox regression analyses to test for possible confounders. No patients were lost to follow-up. Results: In total, 164 patients had a tumor in the right lung and 118 had tumor in the left lung. All patients had at least 4.5 years' follow-up. Median overall survival was 19 months (right) and 22.5 months (left) p = .729. Three-year overall survival was 31% (right) and 35% (left). In Cox regression analyses age, performances status and total mean lung dose were statistically significant with a hazard ratio (HR) = 1.03 (95% Cl: 1.01-1.05), HR = 1.60 (95% Cl: 1.12-2.28), and HR = 1.11 (95% Cl: 1.06-1.16), respectively. Conclusion: This study did not verify that laterality has a significant impact on survival in LA-NSCLC patients treated with curative intended RT.

Induction chemotherapy for T3N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer increases the rate of complete resection but does not confer improved survival

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of induction therapy prior to an operation in patients with cT3 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with cT3N0M0 NSCLC from 2006 to 2011 in the National Cancer Database who were treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy were stratified by treatment strategy: an operation first versus induction chemotherapy. Propensity scores were developed and matched cohorts were generated. Short-term outcomes included margin status, 30- and 90-day mortality rates, readmission and length of stay. Survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier methods were performed on both the unadjusted and propensity matched cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 3791 cT3N0M0 patients were identified for inclusion, of which 580 (15%) were treated with induction chemotherapy. Prior to adjustment, patients treated with induction chemotherapy were younger, had a higher comorbidity burden and were more likely to have private insurance (all P  < 0.001). Following matching, patients receiving induction chemotherapy were more likely to subsequently undergo an open procedure (87.3 vs 77.8%, P  = 0.005). These patients were more likely to obtain R0 resection (93.1% vs 90.0%, P  = 0.04) and were thereby less likely to have positive margins at the time of resection (6.9% vs 10.0%, P  = 0.03). Patients who received induction therapy had higher rates of 90-day mortality (6.6% vs 3.4%) but there was no difference in long-term survival between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite yielding increased rates of R0 resection, induction chemotherapy for cT3N0M0 NSCLC is not associated with improved survival and should not be considered routinely. Further studies are warranted to elucidate cohorts that may benefit from induction therapy.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy followed by surgery is superior to that followed by definitive chemoradiation or radiotherapy in stage IIIA (N2) nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis and system review

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% of all cases of nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are of a locally advanced (IIIA or IIIB) stage. However, surgical therapy for patients with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC is associated with a disappointing 5-year survival rate. The optimal treatment for stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC is still in dispute.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases (last search updated in March 2015), and a meta-analysis of the available data was conducted. Two authors independently extracted data from each eligible study.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies, including five randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies, were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Significant homogeneity (χ (2)=49.62, P=0.000, I (2)=81.9%) was detected between four of the studies, including a total of 11,948 selected cases. Among the nine studies that investigated overall survival, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) was 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.87; P=0.000). Subgroup analyses were performed according to the study design and the extent of resection. We observed a statistically significant better outcome after lobectomy (pooled HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.58; P=0.000) than after pneumonectomy (pooled HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.98; P=0.028). Unfortunately, there was no significant difference between the randomized controlled studies, as the pooled HR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.81-1.09; P=0.440).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy followed by surgery (particularly lobectomy) is superior to following these therapies with definitive chemoradiation or radiotherapy, particularly in patients undergoing lobectomy.

Combined Modality Therapy for Thoracic and head and Neck Cancers: A Review of Updated Literature Based on a Consensus Meeting

Purpose

Combined modality therapy is a mainstay option for thoracic malignancies and head and neck cancers. The integration of different strategies is based on the multidisciplinary approach of modern clinical oncology. Radiation oncologists have to be educated, trained, and updated to provide state-of-the-art care to cancer patients and thus educational meetings are crucial.

Methods

The Italian Association of Radiation Oncology Young Members Working Group (AIRO Giovani) organized its 8th national meeting, focused on combination therapy in lung, esophageal, and head and neck cancer (with a specific focus on larynx-preservation strategies for larynx/hypopharynx tumors), involving young professionals working in Italy. The meeting was addressed to young radiation oncologists, presenting state-of-the-art knowledge, based on the latest evidence in this field. We performed a review of the current literature based on the highlights of the Congress.

Results

The multimodality approach of head and neck and thoracic malignancies includes surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, but also has to take into account new information and data coming from basic and translational research and including molecular biology, genetics, and immunology. All these aspects are crucial for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and esophageal, esophagogastric junction, and larynx/hypopharynx malignancies. The integration of different treatments in the clinical decision-making process to combine therapies is crucial.

Conclusions

Combination therapy has proved to be a consolidated approach in these specific oncologic settings, highlighting the importance of multimodality management in modern clinical oncology. Dedicated meetings on specific topics are helpful to improve knowledge and skills of young professionals in radiation oncology.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) induction and adjuvant therapy for N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

The integration of chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), and surgery in the management of patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung carcinoma is challenging. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria Lung Cancer Panel was charged to update management recommendations for this clinical scenario. The Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. There is limited level I evidence to guide patient selection for induction, postoperative RT (PORT), or definitive RT. Literature interpretation is complicated by inconsistent diagnostic procedures for N2 disease, disease heterogeneity, and pooled analysis with other stages. PORT is an appropriate therapy following adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with incidental pN2 disease. In patients with clinical N2 disease who are potential candidates for a lobectomy, both definitive and induction concurrent chemotherapy/RT are appropriate treatments. In N2 patients who require a pneumonectomy, definitive concurrent chemotherapy/RT is most appropriate although induction concurrent chemotherapy/RT may be considered in expert hands. Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery +/- PORT may also be an option in N2 patients. For preoperative RT and PORT, 3-dimensional conformal techniques and intensity-modulated RT are most appropriate.

Treating locally advanced disease: an analysis of very large, hilar lymph node positive non-small cell lung cancer using the National Cancer Data Base

BACKGROUND

Very large, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) remain a therapeutic challenge. This retrospective study compares the effect of treatment modalities on survival of patients with large NSCLC with hilar lymph node involvement (T3>7 cmN1).

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify adult patients who were diagnosed with T3>7 cmN1 NSCLC from 1999 to 2005 (n=642). Nonsurgical treatments included chemoradiation, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or no treatment, whereas primary surgical treatments included surgery, chemoradiation or chemotherapy prior to surgery, chemoradiation or chemotherapy after surgery, or postoperative radiotherapy. Five-year overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons made using log-rank tests and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 642 patients were evaluated; 425 nonsurgical (66%) and 217 surgical (34%). Primary surgical therapy was associated with improved 5-year OS; 28% versus 8% and 4% for nonsurgical and no treatment, respectively (p<0.001). The 5-year OS were 11%, 5%, 2%, and 4% for chemoradiation, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and no treatment, respectively (p<0.001). The 5-year OS were 16% for surgery only, 40% and 44% for neoadjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy with surgery, respectively, 40% and 38% for adjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy with surgery, respectively, and 18% for postoperative radiotherapy (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, surgery and chemotherapy in most combinations were associated with significantly improved OS compared with chemoradiation only.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery with systemic therapy delivered in a neoadjuvant or adjuvant fashion for patients with T3>7 cmN1 NSCLCs is associated with improvements in OS.

Improved survival associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with clinical stage IIIA(N2) non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Optimal management of clinical stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. This study examines whether neoadjuvant chemoradiation plus surgery improves survival rates when compared with other recommended treatment strategies.

METHODS

Adult patients from the National Cancer Database, with clinical stage IIIA-N2 disease definitively treated between 1998 and 2004 at American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accredited facilities, were included in the study. Treatment was defined as neoadjuvant chemoradiation plus either lobectomy (NeoCRT+L) or pneumonectomy (NeoCRT+P), lobectomy plus adjuvant therapy (L+AT), pneumonectomy plus adjuvant therapy (P+AT), and concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). Median follow-up and overall survival (OS) were defined from date of diagnosis to last contact. Five-year OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and facility characteristics.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 11.8 months for 11,242 eligible patients. Five-year OS was 33.5%, 20.7%, 20.3%, 13.35%, and 10.9% for NeoCRT+L, NeoCRT+P, L+AT, P+AT, and CRT, respectively (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, the estimated hazard ratio was 0.51 (CI: 0.45-0.58) for NeoCRT+L; 0.77 (0.63-0.95) for NeoCRT+P; 0.66 (0.59-0.75) for L+AT; 0.69 (0.54-0.88) for P+AT; and 1.0 (reference) for the CRT group. Comorbidity did not attenuate the relationship between treatment and survival.

CONCLUSION

This large study demonstrates that patients with clinical stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by lobectomy, were associated with an improved survival.

[Chemo-radiotherapy before surgery in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer]

Surgery is often performed when N2 non-small-cell lung cancer can be resected by lobectomy since the publication of the "EORTC 08941" and "RTOG 9309" trials (the latter showed high mortality rate after pneumonectomy). The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy has been proved, and that of modern adjuvant radiotherapy is suspected, but neoadjuvant chemotherapy is also routinely performed in France. Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is more accepted in the USA and northern Europe. Four randomized trials have not shown any advantage in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, due to increased postoperative mortality, but retrospective studies in specialized centers have demonstrated low operative risks, even after high-dose radiation, or pneumonectomy. In the case of invasive apical tumors, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is recommended. In case of local recurrence without distant recurrence after exclusive chemo-radiotherapy, curative surgery may be envisaged.