1
|
Kodali S, Connor AA, Brombosz EW, Ghobrial RM. Update on the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2024; 20:151-158. [PMID: 38680168 PMCID: PMC11047158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a neoplasm of the biliary tract that has become increasingly prevalent throughout the world. Common risk factors for developing CCA include cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and trematode fluke infestation, although there are no set screening guidelines in high-risk groups. Lesions are typically identified via cross-sectional imaging and/or elevated serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, often followed by cytology or brushings with fluorescence in situ hybridization for confirmation. Treatments can vary among CCA subtypes but frequently involve systemic therapies such as gemcitabine and cisplatin with durvalumab or pembrolizumab. Targeted therapies may also be effective (eg, ivosidenib, pemigatinib, infigratinib, futibatinib) depending on the molecular alterations present. Resection is the most common surgical treatment for CCA, although liver transplantation is also an option in highly selected patients with liver-limited unresectable disease. Radiotherapy may also be a treatment option, as well as transarterial radioembolization (eg, yttrium-90), which is often utilized in combination with systemic therapy. Although patients with CCA have traditionally had a poor prognosis, recent advances in treatment, including new systemic therapies and increased utilization of liver transplantation, have improved expected survival. This article reviews screening modalities, pros and cons of diagnostic techniques, and therapies that are currently available to treat patients with CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudha Kodali
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J. C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Ashton A. Connor
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J. C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | | - R. Mark Ghobrial
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J. C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ohaegbulam KC, Koethe Y, Fung A, Mayo SC, Grossberg AJ, Chen EY, Sharzehi K, Kardosh A, Farsad K, Rocha FG, Thomas CR, Nabavizadeh N. The multidisciplinary management of cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 2023; 129:184-214. [PMID: 36382577 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a lethal malignancy of the biliary epithelium that can arise anywhere along the biliary tract. Surgical resection confers the greatest likelihood of long-term survivability. However, its insidious onset, difficult diagnostics, and resultant advanced presentation render the majority of patients unresectable, highlighting the importance of early detection with novel biomarkers. Developing liver-directed therapies and emerging targeted therapeutics may offer improved survivability for patients with unresectable or advanced disease. In this article, the authors review the current multidisciplinary standards of care in resectable and unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, with an emphasis on novel biomarkers for early detection and nonsurgical locoregional therapy options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim C Ohaegbulam
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Yilun Koethe
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Alice Fung
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Skye C Mayo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Aaron J Grossberg
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Emerson Y Chen
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kaveh Sharzehi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Adel Kardosh
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Khashayar Farsad
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Nima Nabavizadeh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Silver CM, Joung RH, Logan CD, Benson AB, Mahalingam D, D’Angelica MI, Bentrem DJ, Yang AD, Bilimoria KY, Merkow RP. Neoadjuvant therapy use and association with postoperative outcomes and overall survival in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:90-98. [PMID: 36194064 PMCID: PMC9729397 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Evidence for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) is limited. Our objectives were to: (1) characterize treatment trends, (2) identify factors associated with receipt of NAT, and (3) evaluate associations between NAT and postoperative outcomes. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database (2004-2017). Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between NAT and postoperative outcomes. Stratified analysis evaluated differences between surgery first, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT). RESULTS Among 8040 patients, 417 (5.2%) received NAT. NAT increased during the study period 2.9%-8.4% (p < 0.001). Factors associated with receipt of NAT included age <50 (vs. >75, odds ratio [OR] 4.32, p < 0.001) and stage 3 disease (vs. 1, OR 1.68, p = 0.01). Compared with surgery first, patients who received NAT had higher odds of R0 resection (OR 1.49, p = 0.01) and lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.51, p = 0.04). On stratified analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with differences in any outcomes. However, neoadjuvant CRT was associated with improvement in R0 resection (OR 3.52, <0.001) and median survival (47.8 vs. 25.3 months, log-rank < 0.001) compared to surgery first. CONCLUSIONS NAT, particularly neoadjuvant CRT, was associated with improved postoperative outcomes. These data suggest expanding the use of neoadjuvant CRT for eCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey M. Silver
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rachel H. Joung
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Charles D. Logan
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Al B. Benson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Devalingam Mahalingam
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael I. D’Angelica
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloane Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - David J. Bentrem
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Anthony D. Yang
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Karl Y. Bilimoria
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ryan P. Merkow
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith EN, Coleman A, J. Galgano S, Burgan CM, Porter KK. Cholangiocarcinoma. ONCOLOGIC IMAGING : A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 2023:133-159. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-69538-1.00011-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
5
|
MURAKAMI TAKASHI, AIZAWA RIHITO, MATSUO YUKINORI, HANAZAWA HIDEKI, TAURA KOJIRO, FUKUDA AKIHISA, UZA NORIMITSU, SHIOKAWA MASAHIRO, KANAI MASASHI, HATANO ETSURO, SENO HIROSHI, MUTO MANABU, MIZOWAKI TAKASHI. Efficacy and Safety of External-beam Radiation Therapy for Unresectable Primary or Local Recurrent Cholangiocarcinoma. CANCER DIAGNOSIS & PROGNOSIS 2022; 2:634-640. [PMID: 36340447 PMCID: PMC9628149 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Treatment options for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma are limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of definitive external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with unresectable primary cholangiocarcinoma, or local recurrent cholangiocarcinoma after primary surgery, without distant metastasis who received definitive EBRT (≥45 Gy) between January 2006 and December 2020 at our Institution were analyzed retrospectively. EBRT was basically performed using conventional fractionation (1.8-2 Gy per fraction). Prophylactic nodal irradiation was not performed. RESULTS A total of 21 consecutive patients were analyzed: 7 primary and 14 recurrent cases. The median age was 70 (range=38-85) years at initiation of EBRT. A median dose of 54 (range=45-60) Gy comprising 1.8 (range=1.8-3) Gy per fraction was administered to the primary/recurrent local tumor site. The median follow-up period was 21.6 months. The 2-year overall survival, cause-specific survival, progression-free survival, and local recurrence-free rates were 35.7, 35.7, 16.1, and 32.7%, respectively. Long-term local control (>2 years after EBRT) was achieved in 19.0%. Grade 3 toxicities related to EBRT were observed in 4.8% (duodenum hemorrhage). No grade 4 or higher toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION Definitive EBRT for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma was feasible and achieved long-term local control in a subset of patients. As the avoidance of local recurrence may lead to the benefits of prolonging biliary patency and subsequently alleviating the need for an invasive procedure for biliary drainage, EBRT could be one sustainable therapeutic option for patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- TAKASHI MURAKAMI
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - RIHITO AIZAWA
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - YUKINORI MATSUO
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - HIDEKI HANAZAWA
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - KOJIRO TAURA
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Oncology, Kitano Hospital Medical Research Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - AKIHISA FUKUDA
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - NORIMITSU UZA
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - MASAHIRO SHIOKAWA
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - MASASHI KANAI
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - ETSURO HATANO
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - HIROSHI SENO
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - MANABU MUTO
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - TAKASHI MIZOWAKI
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Newest Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma: An Updated Overview of Approved Treatments with Transplant Oncology Vision. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205074. [PMID: 36291857 PMCID: PMC9600404 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cholangiocarcinoma is a relatively rare but deadly disease with traditionally limited treatment options. The disease can be categorized by anatomic location within the biliary tree, with different associated risk factors and molecular profiles. Recent years have seen a burgeoning of targeted therapies that have enhanced survival in subsets of patients with certain mutations. We herein discuss these more recent advances as well as providing an overview of more well-known treatment modalities, with the goal of providing an accessible source for practicing clinicians. Abstract A minority of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) can be cured by surgical intervention (i.e., liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT)). When modern criteria for LT are met, this intervention along with neoadjuvant treatments may achieve unprecedented survival in selected patients. Liver resection is associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 40 months, this number drastically decreases for unresectable advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), which is treated with systemic therapy. The first-line chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin is associated with a median overall survival of only 11.7 months. Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s approval of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 inhibitor ivosidenib in August 2021, there has been increasing interest in targeted therapy for CCA patients harboring mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2, neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK), B-raf kinase (BRAF), and HER2. At the same time, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors isalso being used in relapsed CCA. This review looks into the most recently completed and ongoing studies of targeted therapy as monotherapy or in combination with chemo- and/or immunotherapy. Whether it is resection, liver transplant, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or any combination of these treatment modalities, great strides are being made to improve outcomes for this challenging disease.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ma Y, Chen Z, Zhu W, Yu J, Ji H, Tang X, Yu H, Fan L, Liang B, Li R, Li J, Li Z, Lin M, Niu L. Chemotherapy plus concurrent irreversible electroporation improved local tumor control in unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma compared with chemotherapy alone. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 38:1512-1518. [PMID: 34767740 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1991008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (UHC) is a malignant tumor and has a poor prognosis. IRE is a novel non-thermal ablative therapy that causes cellular apoptosis via electrical impulses. To compare the curative effect for UHC, chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE and chemotherapy alone were set up. MATERIALS AND METHODS From July 2015 to May 2019, 47 patients with UHC were analyzed to chemotherapy + IRE group (n = 23) or chemotherapy alone group (n = 24) in this study. Treatment response was assessed with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1 month after treatment and every 3 months thereafter. Local tumor progression (LTP), time to LTP, overall survival (OS) and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE group showed a tendency toward a decreased rate of LTP (16.7% vs. 39.5%; p = 0.039) and an increased complete response rate (52.2% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.011) compared with chemotherapy alone group. Time to LTP was significantly longer in the chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE group compared to chemotherapy alone group (11.2 months vs. 4.2 months; p = 0.001). Median OS was significantly longer in the chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE group compared to chemotherapy alone group (19.6 months vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE improved local control and prolonged time to LTP and OS in patients with UHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangyang Ma
- Central Laboratory, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhixian Chen
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weibing Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Yu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Ji
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaosong Tang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huayan Yu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liping Fan
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bing Liang
- Department of Surgery and Anesthesia, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rongrong Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianyu Li
- Department of Surgery and Anesthesia, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhonghai Li
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mao Lin
- Central Laboratory, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lizhi Niu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koh M, Park JH, Yoo C, Yoon SM, Jung J, Ryoo BY, Chang HM, Kim KP, Jeong JH, Kim JH. Radiation therapy for recurrent extrahepatic bile duct cancer. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0253285. [PMID: 34133471 PMCID: PMC8208553 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE More than half of patients with bile duct cancer (BDC) develop recurrence even after curative resection. Recurrent BDC has a poor prognosis, and no optimal treatment modality has been established. We therefore analyzed our experience on the survival outcomes of radiation therapy (RT) for recurrent extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHBDC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with recurrent EHBDC who underwent concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) or RT alone at our institution between January 2001 and June 2015. Freedom from locoregional progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors. RESULTS A total of 76 patients were included in the analysis. The median OS was 16 months and the rates of 2-year FFLP, PFS, and OS were 61%, 25%, and 33%, respectively. Among the evaluable patients, the first site of failure was the locoregional area in 16 patients, distant metastasis in 27, and both sites in 8. On univariate analysis, disease-free interval (p = 0.012) and concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.040) were found as significant prognostic factors for OS. One patient with CCRT developed a grade 3 hematologic toxicity, and two patients experienced late grade 3 toxicities including duodenal ulcer bleeding and obstruction. CONCLUSIONS RT for recurrent EHBDC showed favorable survival and local control with limited treatment-related toxicities. Considering that the most common pattern of failure was distant metastasis, further studies on the optimal scheme of chemotherapy and RT are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minji Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-hong Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Min Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinhong Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Baek-Yeol Ryoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Heung-Moon Chang
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu-pyo Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Ho Jeong
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jethwa KR, Sannapaneni S, Mullikin TC, Harmsen WS, Petersen MM, Antharam P, Laughlin B, Mahipal A, Halfdanarson TR, Merrell KW, Neben-Wittich M, Sio TT, Haddock MG, Hallemeier CL. Chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced or unresectable extra-hepatic biliary cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 11:1408-1420. [PMID: 33457010 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although surgical resection is the preferred curative-intent treatment option for patients with non-metastatic, extra-hepatic biliary cancer (EBC), radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be utilized in select cases when surgical resection is not feasible. The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with CRT for patients with locally advanced and unresectable EBC. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with EBC, including extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer, deemed inoperable who received RT between 1998 and 2018. The median RT dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and 94% received concurrent 5-fluorouracil. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of RT. The cumulative incidence of local progression (LP), locoregional progression (LRP), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported with death as a competing risk. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess for correlation between patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes. Results Forty-eight patients were included for analysis. The median OS was 12.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-73.2 months]. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 33% (95% CI: 22-50%), 20% (95% CI: 11-36%), and 7% (95% CI: 2-20%), respectively. The 2-year PFS, LP, LRP, and DM were 21% (95% CI: 12-36%), 27% (95% CI: 17-44%), 31% (95% CI: 20-48%), and 33% (95% CI: 22-50%), respectively. On univariate analysis, biologically effective dose (BED) >59.5 Gy10 was associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18-0.92, P=0.03] and PFS (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.84, P=0.02) and primary tumor size (per 1 cm increase) was associated with worsened PFS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02-1.63, P=0.04). BED >59.5 Gy10 remained associated with PFS on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.78, P=0.01). Treatment-related grade 3+ acute and late gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 13% and 17% of patients, respectively. Conclusions RT is associated with 3- and 5-year survival in a subset of patients with unresectable EBC. Further exploration of the role of RT as part of a multi-modality curative treatment strategy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shilpa Sannapaneni
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Trey C Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Molly M Petersen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Brady Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gkika E, Hawkins MA, Grosu AL, Brunner TB. The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 10:604387. [PMID: 33381458 PMCID: PMC7768034 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.604387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumors, which are categorized according to their anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), distal (dCCA) cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas (GBC), with distinct epidemiology, biology, and prognosis. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay in operable BTC as it is the only potentially curative treatment option. Nevertheless, even after curative (R0) resection, the 5-year survival rate ranges between 20 and 40% and the disease free survival rates (DFS) is approximately 48–65% after one year and 23–35% after three years without adjuvant treatment. Improvements in adjuvant chemotherapy have improved the DFS, but the role of adjuvant radiotherapy is unclear. On the other hand, more than 50% of the patients present with unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis, which limits the prognosis to a few months without treatment. Herein, we review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in the curative and palliative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Cholangiocarcinoma - Part II: Treatment. Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:1430-1442. [PMID: 32952071 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Currently, the only curative treatment for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is surgical resection, though this treatment is possible in less than 40% of patients. However, recent improvements in preoperative management have led to a higher number of patients who are candidates for this procedure. For unresectable patients, progress is ongoing in terms of locoregional and chemoradiation treatments and target therapies, especially in the definition of patient selection criteria. This is the second part of the Italian CCA guidelines, dealing with CCA treatment, that have been formulated in accordance with Italian National Institute of Health indications and developed according to the GRADE method and related advancements.
Collapse
|
12
|
Dee EC, Freret ME, Horick N, Raldow AC, Goyal L, Zhu AX, Parikh AR, Ryan DP, Clark JW, Allen JN, Ferrone CR, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Tanabe KK, Drapek LC, Hong TS, Qadan M, Wo JY. Patterns of Failure and the Need for Biliary Intervention in Resected Biliary Tract Cancers After Chemoradiation. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:5161-5172. [PMID: 32740733 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08967-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assessed patterns of failure and rates of subsequent biliary intervention among patients with resected biliary tract cancers (BTCs) including gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) and extra- and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA and iCCA) treated with adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT). METHODS In this single-institution retrospective analysis of 80 patients who had GBC (n = 29), eCCA (n = 43), or iCCA (n = 8) treated with curative-intent resection and adjuvant CRT from 2007 to 2017, the median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy (range 36-65 Gy) with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. All but two of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The 2-year locoregional failure (LRF), 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), and 2-year overall survival (OS), and univariate predictors of LRF, RFS, and OS were calculated for the entire cohort and for a subgroup excluding patients with iCCA (n = 72). The predictors of biliary interventions also were assessed. RESULTS Of the 80 patients (median follow-up period, 30.5 months; median OS, 33.9 months), 54.4% had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 1 or 2 disease, 57.1% were lymph node-positive, and 66.3% underwent margin-negative resection. For the entire cohort, 2-year LRF was 23.8%, 2-year RFS was 43.7%, and 2-year OS was 62.1%. When patients with iCCA were excluded, the 2-year LRF was 22.6%, the 2-year RFS was 43.9%, and the 2-year OS was 59.2%. In the overall and subgroup univariate analyses, lymph node positivity was associated with greater LRF, whereas resection margin was not. Biliary intervention was required for 12 (63.2%) of the 19 patients with LRF versus 11 (18%) of the 61 patients without LRF (P < 0.001). Of the 12 patients with LRF who required biliary intervention, 4 died of biliary complications. CONCLUSIONS The LRF rates remained significant despite adjuvant CRT. Lymph node positivity may be associated with increased risk of LRF. Positive margins were not associated with greater LRF, suggesting that CRT may mitigate LRF risk for this group. An association between LRF and higher rates of subsequent biliary interventions was observed, which may yield significant morbidity. Novel strategies to decrease the rates of LRF should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Morgan E Freret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nora Horick
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann C Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew X Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aparna R Parikh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David P Ryan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jill N Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Tanabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lorraine C Drapek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Treated With Proton Beam Therapy. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 43:180-186. [PMID: 31764017 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical outcomes and failure patterns of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CC) who had been treated with proton beam therapy (PBT). METHODS The authors retrospectively examined 30 patients with unresectable CC who had undergone PBT between November 2015 and December 2017. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent predictors of survival were identified by multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Complications were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS The median tumor size was 7 cm. Seventeen patients (56.7%) had regional lymph node metastases. The median radiation dose was 72.6 cobalt gray equivalents, and 23 patients (76.7%) received concurrent chemotherapy. The 1-year local control, regional control, and distant metastases-free rates were 88%, 86%, and 68%, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 19.3 and 10.4 months, respectively. The median jaundice-free survival was 13 months, with a 1-year biliary tract infection (BTI)-free rate of 58%. Patients who received concurrent chemotherapy had a better median progression-free survival (12.1 vs. 4.7 mo). The most common form of acute toxicity from PBT was acute skin reactions which were rarely severe (grade III: 7% of patients). Three and 2 patients had grade III-IV toxicities and radiation-induced liver disease. There were no deaths caused by PBT or concurrent chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS PBT is clinically useful in patients with unresectable CC, even in the presence of large tumors or regional nodal metastases. Its use may induce durable symptom relief, without increasing acute or late toxicity.
Collapse
|
14
|
Alanazi SA, Alanazi F, Haq N, Shakeel F, Badran MM, Harisa GI. Lipoproteins-Nanocarriers as a Promising Approach for Targeting Liver Cancer: Present Status and Application Prospects. Curr Drug Deliv 2020; 17:826-844. [PMID: 32026776 DOI: 10.2174/1567201817666200206104338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of liver cancer is increasing over the years and it is the fifth leading cause of mortality worldwide. The intrusive features and burden of low survival rate make it a global health issue in both developing and developed countries. The recommended chemotherapy drugs for patients in the intermediate and advanced stages of various liver cancers yield a low response rate due to the nonspecific nature of drug delivery, thus warranting the search for new therapeutic strategies and potential drug delivery carriers. There are several new drug delivery methods available to ferry the targeted molecules to the specific biological environment. In recent years, the nano assembly of lipoprotein moieties (lipidic nanoparticles) has emerged as a promising and efficiently tailored drug delivery system in liver cancer treatment. This increased precision of nano lipoproteins conjugates in chemotherapeutic targeting offers new avenues for the treatment of liver cancer with high specificity and efficiency. This present review is focused on concisely outlining the knowledge of liver cancer diagnosis, existing treatment strategies, lipoproteins, their preparation, mechanism and their potential application in the treatment of liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saleh A Alanazi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fars Alanazi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nazrul Haq
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faiyaz Shakeel
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed M Badran
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Gamaleldin I Harisa
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhou C, Li H, Huang Q, Wang J, Gao K. Biliary self-expandable metallic stent combined with Iodine-125 seeds strand in the treatment of hilar malignant biliary obstruction. J Int Med Res 2019; 48:300060519887843. [PMID: 31884851 PMCID: PMC7783887 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519887843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the safety and effectiveness of a self-expandable metallic stent
(SEMS) combined with Iodine-125 seeds strand to treat hilar malignant
biliary obstruction (MBO). Methods This retrospective study included patients who had received SEMS with
125I seeds strand (seeds group) or SEMS alone (controls) to
treat hilar MBO. Demographic, biochemical, stent patency, overall survival
and complications data were extracted and analysed. Results A total of 76 patients were included (seeds group, n = 40;
controls, n = 36), with a total of 608 seeds deployed in
the seeds group (mean, 15.2 ± 4.1 [range, 8–25] seeds per patient).
Statistically significant between-group differences were shown in median
stent patency time (seeds group, 387.0 ± 27.9 days [95% confidence interval
{CI} 332.4, 441.6] versus controls, 121.0 ± 9.1 days [95% CI 103.2, 138.8])
and in median overall survival (seeds group, 177.0 ± 17.9 days [95% CI
141.8, 212.2] versus controls, 123.0 ± 20.4 [95% CI 83.0, 163.0]). There
were no statistically significant between-group differences in complication
rates. Conclusion SEMS combined with 125I seeds strand is safe, feasible, and
tolerable in treating patients with hilar MBO, and may be effective in
prolonging stent patency time and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanguo Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianfeng Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Gao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kasuya G, Terashima K, Shibuya K, Toyama S, Ebner DK, Tsuji H, Okimoto T, Ohno T, Shioyama Y, Nakano T, Kamada T. Carbon-ion radiotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional study by and the Japan carbon-ion radiation oncology study group (J-CROS). Oncotarget 2019; 10:4369-4379. [PMID: 31320991 PMCID: PMC6633891 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for cholangiocarcinoma via a multicenter retrospective study. Clinical data were collected from patients with cholangiocarcinoma who had received CIRT at one of four treating institutions in Japan. Of 56 eligible patients, none received surgery for cholangiocarcinoma before or after CIRT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Based on the tumor site, the 56 cases were categorized as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) (n=27) or perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) (n=29). In all patients, the median tumor size was 37 (range, 15‒110) mm, and the most commonly prescribed dose was 76 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 20 fractions. The median survival was 14.8 (range, 2.1-129.2) months, and the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 69.7% and 40.9%, respectively. The median survival times of the patients with IHC and those with PHC were 23.8 and 12.6 months, respectively. Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that cholangitis pre-CIRT and Child‒Pugh class B were significant prognostic factors for an unfavorable OS. Of four patients who died of liver failure, one with IHC was suspected to have radiation-induced liver disease because of newly developed ascites, and died at 4.3 months post-CIRT. Grade 3 CIRT-related bile duct stenosis was observed in one IHC case. No other CIRT-related severe adverse events, including gastrointestinal events, were observed. These results suggest that CIRT yields relatively favorable treatment outcomes, especially for patients with IHC, and acceptable toxicities were observed in patients with cholangiocarcinoma who did not receive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goro Kasuya
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Shingo Toyama
- Ion Beam Therapy Center, SAGA-HIMAT Foundation, Tosu, Japan
| | - Daniel K Ebner
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.,Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | | | - Takashi Nakano
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kamada
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Frakulli R, Buwenge M, Macchia G, Cammelli S, Deodato F, Cilla S, Cellini F, Mattiucci GC, Bisello S, Brandi G, Parisi S, Morganti AG. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180688. [PMID: 30673295 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been used in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) but toxicity and clinical results of SBRT in CC are still limited and sparse. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to analyze the results of SBRT in the setting of advanced CC. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library using the PRISMA methodology. Studies including at least 10 patients with diagnosis of advanced CC regardless of tumor site and other treatments were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were local control (LC) and toxicity rates. The ROBINS-I risk of bias tool was used. RESULTS 10 studies (231 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in this review. All but one study showed moderate to serious risk of bias. Median follow up was 15 months (range: 7.8-64.0 months). Pooled 1 year OS was 58.3% (95% CI: 50.2-66.1%) and pooled 2 year OS was 35.5% (95% CI: 22.1-50.1%). Pooled 1 year LC was 83.4%, (95% CI: 76.5-89.4%). The reported toxicities were acceptable and manageable with only one treatment-related death. CONCLUSION The role of SBRT in CC is not yet supported by robust evidence in literature. However, within this limit, preliminary results seem almost comparable to the ones of standard chemotherapy or chemoradiation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE SBRT seems effective in terms of LC with acceptable treatment-related toxicities. Therefore, SBRT can be considered a therapeutic option at least in selected patients with CC, possibly combined with adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rezarta Frakulli
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- 2 Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II", Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- 2 Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II", Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- 3 Medical Physic Unit, Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II", Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- 4 Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Gian C Mattiucci
- 4 Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Silvia Bisello
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- 5 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Cancer Research, University of Bologna , Bologna , Italy
| | - Salvatore Parisi
- 6 Unit of Radiotherapy, IRCCS"Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" San Giovanni Rotondo , Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grimm M. Karzinome der Gallenwege. STRAHLENTHERAPIE KOMPAKT 2019:109-111. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-3-437-23292-3.00011-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
|
19
|
An atlas for clinical target volume definition, including elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy of biliary cancer. Oncol Lett 2018; 17:1784-1790. [PMID: 30675238 PMCID: PMC6341831 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is a treatment option for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), often combined with sequential and/or concurrent chemotherapy. The use of modern RT techniques requires accurate clinical target volume (CTV) definition and delineation. However, guidelines for CTV delineation in BTC are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to propose a computer tomography (CT) atlas for CTV definition of BTC. We previously proposed guidelines to define the nodal CTV (CTV-N) in BTC. In this study, based on a literature analysis, we defined the margins to be added to the gross tumor volume (GTV; subclinical and microscopic disease) to define the primary tumor CTV (CTV-T). An abdominal contrast enhanced planning CT scan was performed on three different patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC), extrahepatic CC and gallbladder cancer. The GTV and anatomical reference structures were outlined on CT images. Then, based on our guidelines, the CTV-T and CTV-N were delineated and merged to define the final CTV in the three patients. An atlas, showing the defined CTV, was generated from the reference CT images to illustrate the CTV for intra-hepatic CC, extra-hepatic CC and gallbladder cancer. This atlas can be used as an aid for CTV definition in patients with BTC treated with modern RT techniques.
Collapse
|
20
|
Elganainy D, Holliday EB, Taniguchi CM, Smith GL, Shroff R, Javle M, Raghav K, Kaseb A, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Tzeng CWD, Herman JM, Koong AC, Krishnan SX, Minsky BD, Crane CH, Das P, Koay EJ. Dose escalation of radiotherapy in unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Med 2018; 7:4880-4892. [PMID: 30152073 PMCID: PMC6198206 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the effect of escalated dose radiation therapy (EDR, defined as doses >50.4 Gy in 28 fractions [59.5 Gy BED]) on overall survival (OS), freedom from local progression (FFLP), and freedom from distant progression (FFDP) of patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC). Methods A consecutive cohort of 80 patients who underwent radiotherapy for unresectable EHCC from 2001 to 2015 was identified. Demographic, tumor, treatment, toxicity, and laboratory variables were collected. The maximal RT doses ranged from 30 to 75 Gy (median 50.4 Gy, at 1.8‐4.5 Gy/fraction). Gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage by maximal dose in EDR group ranged from 38% to 100%. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate OS, FFLP, and FFDP. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were analyzed. Results After radiotherapy, median OS, FFLP, and FFDP were 18.7, 22.6, and 24.3 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS or FFLP between patients who received EDR to portions of the GTV and patients who did not. On multivariate analysis, bigger GTV, age, and ECOG performance status were independently associated with shorter OS. Local progression on chemotherapy prior to RT was independently associated with shorter FFLP. High baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (>5.3) was independently associated with shorter FFDP. Toxicity grades were similar in EDR and lower doses except lymphopenia which was higher in EDR (P = 0.053). Conclusions EDR to selective portions of the GTV may not benefit patients with unresectable EHCC despite having acceptable toxicity. New methods to improve local control and survival for unresectable EHCC are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalia Elganainy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rachna Shroff
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ahmed Kaseb
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sunil X Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yamada M, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Sugawara G, Mizuno T, Yamaguchi J, Nagino M. Pulmonary Metastasis After Resection of Cholangiocarcinoma: Incidence, Resectability, and Survival. World J Surg 2018; 41:1550-1557. [PMID: 28105527 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-3877-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few reports on pulmonary metastasis from cholangiocarcinoma; therefore, its incidence, resectability, and survival are unclear. METHODS Patients who underwent surgical resection for cholangiocarcinoma, including intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed, and this study focused on patients with pulmonary metastasis. RESULTS Between January 2003 and December 2014, 681 patients underwent surgical resection for cholangiocarcinoma. Of these, 407 patients experienced disease recurrence, including 46 (11.3%) who developed pulmonary metastasis. Of these 46 patients, 9 underwent resection for pulmonary metastasis; no resection was performed in the remaining 37 patients. R0 resection was achieved in all patients, and no complications related to pulmonary metastasectomy were observed. The median time to recurrence was significantly longer in the 9 patients who underwent surgery than in the 37 patients without surgery (2.5 vs 1.0 years, p < 0.010). Survival after surgery for primary cancer and survival after recurrence were significantly better in the former group than in the latter group (after primary cancer: 66.7 vs 0% at 5 years, p < 0.001; after recurrence: 40.0 vs 8.7% at 3 years, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis identified the time to recurrence and resection for pulmonary metastasis as independent prognostic factors for survival after recurrence. CONCLUSION Resection for pulmonary metastasis originating from cholangiocarcinoma can be safely performed and confers survival benefits for select patients, especially those with a longer time to recurrence after initial surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihoko Yamada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yokoyama
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Igami
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Gen Sugawara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Junpei Yamaguchi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masato Nagino
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ilyas SI, Khan SA, Hallemeier CL, Kelley RK, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma - evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018; 15:95-111. [PMID: 28994423 PMCID: PMC5819599 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1120] [Impact Index Per Article: 160.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumours with features of cholangiocyte differentiation: cholangiocarcinomas are categorized according to anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), or distal (dCCA). Each subtype has a distinct epidemiology, biology, prognosis, and strategy for clinical management. The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma, particularly iCCA, has increased globally over the past few decades. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of potentially curative treatment for all three disease subtypes, whereas liver transplantation after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is restricted to a subset of patients with early stage pCCA. For patients with advanced-stage or unresectable disease, locoregional and systemic chemotherapeutics are the primary treatment options. Improvements in external-beam radiation therapy have facilitated the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Moreover, advances in comprehensive whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing have defined the genetic landscape of each cholangiocarcinoma subtype. Accordingly, promising molecular targets for precision medicine have been identified, and are being evaluated in clinical trials, including those exploring immunotherapy. Biomarker-driven trials, in which patients are stratified according to anatomical cholangiocarcinoma subtype and genetic aberrations, will be essential in the development of targeted therapies. Targeting the rich tumour stroma of cholangiocarcinoma in conjunction with targeted therapies might also be useful. Herein, we review the evolving developments in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumera I Ilyas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Shahid A Khan
- Department of Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK
- Department of Hepatology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, Ducane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | - Christopher L Hallemeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Robin K Kelley
- The University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| | - Gregory J Gores
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Reames BN, Pawlik TM. Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. SURGICAL DISEASES OF THE PANCREAS AND BILIARY TREE 2018:345-389. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8755-4_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
24
|
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinomas (CC) are rare tumors which usually present late and are often difficult to diagnose and treat. CCs are categorized as intrahepatic, hilar, or extrahepatic. Epidemiologic studies suggest that the incidence of intrahepatic CCs may be increasing worldwide. In this chapter, we review the risk factors, clinical presentation, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
25
|
Brachytherapy in the treatment of bile duct cancer - a tough challenge. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:187-195. [PMID: 28533809 PMCID: PMC5437079 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.66893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 03/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The majority of patients with bile duct cancer are diagnosed with clinically advanced disease. Most of these patients have a short life expectancy and are treated with palliative aim. Most patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, which is not amenable to surgical resection, resulting in poor survival. Adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, is therefore used in many centers worldwide for better local control, and with the expectation that it will have a favorable effect on survival. However, the lack of appropriate prospective trials, as well as the small size of the published series and their retrospective nature, has produced insufficient evidence for the best treatment for these patients. Intraluminal brachytherapy is an important component in the multimodality approach to bile duct cancers. The objective of this treatment is to deliver a high local dose of radiation to the tumor while sparing surrounding healthy tissues. The treatment can be safely adapted for right and left hepatic duct, and for common bile duct lesions. Brachytherapy plays a limited but specific role in definitive treatment with curative intent in selected cases of early disease, as well as in the postoperative treatment of small residual disease. Depending on the location of the lesion, in some cases, brachytherapy is a treatment of choice. Clinical indications, different techniques, results, and complications are discussed in this work.
Collapse
|
26
|
Engineer R, Mehta S, Kalyani N, Chaudhari S, Dharia T, Shetty N, Chopra S, Goel M, Kulkarni S, Shrivastava SK. High dose chemoradiation for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinomas using intensity modulated external beam radiotherapy: a single tertiary care centre experience. J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 8:180-186. [PMID: 28280622 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We present results of patients diagnosed with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinomas treated with high dose radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. METHODS From Aug 2005 to Dec 2012, 68 consecutive patients were treated. Fifty patients (group 1) presenting to us with obstructive jaundice were planned for endobiliary brachytherapy (EBBT 14 Gy) followed external beam radiotherapy (EBRT 45 Gy). Twenty-two patients (group 2) who had previously undergone biliary drainage underwent EBRT (57 Gy). All patients received injection Gemcitabine 300 mg/m2/weekly along with EBRT. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients in group 1 and 22 patients in group 2 completed the treatment. Twenty-six (55%) patients achieved complete radiological response, 16 (64%) belonging to group 1 and 8 (44%) of group 2 (P=0.05). The median overall survival (MOS) was 17.5 and 16 months for group 1 and 2 respectively (P=0.07). The 1- and 2-year survival was 63%, and 18% for group I and 61% and 22% for group II respectively. The MOS was 5 months and 1 year survival was 14% for patients receiving EBBT only. MOS was significantly better after complete response (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) modulated high dose radiotherapy used either alone or with brachytherapy demonstrates potential to prolonged overall survival in unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Shaesta Mehta
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Nikhil Kalyani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Suresh Chaudhari
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Tejas Dharia
- Department of Interventional Radiology, , Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Nitin Shetty
- Department of Interventional Radiology, , Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Suyash Kulkarni
- Department of Interventional Radiology, , Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ahmed O, Mathevosian S, Arslan B. Biliary Interventions: Tools and Techniques of the Trade, Access, Cholangiography, Biopsy, Cholangioscopy, Cholangioplasty, Stenting, Stone Extraction, and Brachytherapy. Semin Intervent Radiol 2016; 33:283-290. [PMID: 27904247 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Therapeutic access to the biliary system is generally limited to endoscopic or percutaneous approaches. A variety of percutaneous transhepatic biliary interventions are applicable for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary system pathologies, the majority of which may be performed in conjunction with one another. The backbone of nearly all of these interventions is percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography for opacification of the biliary tree, after which any number of therapeutic or diagnostic modalities may be pursued. We describe an overview of the instrumentation and technical approaches for several fundamental interventional procedures, including percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and internal/external biliary drainage, endobiliary biopsy techniques, cholangioscopy, cholangioplasty and biliary stenting, biliary stone extraction, and intraluminal brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Ahmed
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sipan Mathevosian
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bulent Arslan
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dover LL, Oster RA, McDonald AM, DuBay DA, Wang TN, Jacob R. Impact of adjuvant chemoradiation on survival in patients with resectable cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18:843-850. [PMID: 27542590 PMCID: PMC5061024 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Revised: 07/06/2016] [Accepted: 07/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ideal adjuvant therapy for resected cholangiocarcinoma remains controversial. National guidelines stratify recommendations based on margin status, though few studies are currently available for reference. METHODS Data was abstracted on all patients with definitive resections of cholangiocarcinoma at our institution between 2000 and 2013. Adjuvant chemoradiation consisted of 45 Gy delivered to elective nodal regions and 50.4-54 Gy to the surgical bed with concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed delineated by margin status. RESULTS Curative resection was performed on 95 patients followed by adjuvant chemoradiation in 23/95 (24%) and observation in 72/95 (76%) with a median follow-up of 21.7 months. For those receiving adjuvant chemoradiation the median overall survival was 30.2 months compared with 26.3 months for those observed (p = 0.0695). In a multivariable model controlling for other prognostic factors, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved disease-free survival (HR 0.50, p = 0.03) and overall survival (HR 0.37, p = 0.004). In multivariable models stratified by margin status, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved overall survival following both margin-negative (HR 0.34, p = 0.035) and margin-positive (HR 0.15, p = 0.003) resections. CONCLUSIONS Overall survival was improved with adjuvant chemoradiation following either margin-negative or margin-positive resections, which is not currently reflected in national guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura L Dover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Robert A Oster
- Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Andrew M McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Derek A DuBay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Thomas N Wang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rojymon Jacob
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tanenbaum DG, Hall WA, Mittal P, Nickleach DC, Mikell JL, Colbert LE, Moreno CC, Squires MH, Fisher SB, Yu DS, Kooby DA, Maithel SK, Landry JC. Cholangiocarcinoma size on magnetic resonance imaging versus pathologic specimen: Implications for radiation treatment planning. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 6:201-206. [PMID: 26979545 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Revised: 09/20/2015] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The accuracy of abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in measuring gross tumor volume in patients with resectable cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is unknown. CC is a highly difficult tumor to visualize and treatment with dose-escalated radiation therapy requires clear tumor delineation. We aim to investigate the concordance between imaging and pathologic size in patients with resected CC to determine the usefulness of MRI for image guided treatment modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS The records of 51 patients with resected CC who underwent preoperative MRI were evaluated. Each preoperative MRI was individually reviewed by a diagnostic radiologist (P.M.), who was blinded to pathologic measurements. A combination of dynamic multiphase contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, original imaging reports, and pathologic reports were reviewed for greatest tumor dimensions. A general linear regression model was used to examine the outcome MRI minus pathology using MRI report, T1-weighted measurement, or T2-weighted measurement. A multivariable regression model was fit to assess the association of other factors with pathologic underestimation. RESULTS The median age was 69 years. Eleven tumors were categorized distal/extrahepatic, 17 hilar, and 23 intrahepatic CC. The median tumor size on pathology report was 3.00 cm (range, 0.3-19). The median tumor size from the MRI report was 3 cm (range, 0.80-16.20) and median tumor size on independent radiological review was 3 cm (range, 0.90-17) on the T1-weighted and 3 cm (range, 0.90-17) on the T2-weighted MRI sequences. When compared with pathologic tumor size, the MRI report dimension was found to underestimate tumor size by 4.1 mm (P = .04). On multivariable analysis, pathologic size underestimation was influenced by increasing tumor size (slope, -0.20; P < .001); however, underestimation was not affected by tumor location or MRI sequence. CONCLUSIONS MRI underestimates tumor size, which was more pronounced with larger tumors, but not influenced by tumor location. The potential for gross tumor volume underestimation should be considered when planning highly conformal radiation therapy treatment of CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Tanenbaum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Pardeep Mittal
- Department of Radiology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Dana C Nickleach
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource at Winship, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - John L Mikell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lauren E Colbert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Courtney C Moreno
- Department of Radiology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Malcolm H Squires
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David A Kooby
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jerome C Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Burkhart RA, Laheru DA, Herman JM, Pawlik TM. Multidisciplinary management and the future of treatment in cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2016. [DOI: 10.1517/21678707.2016.1130618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
31
|
Bridgewater JA, Goodman KA, Kalyan A, Mulcahy MF. Biliary Tract Cancer: Epidemiology, Radiotherapy, and Molecular Profiling. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016; 35:e194-e203. [PMID: 27249723 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_160831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Biliary tract cancer, or cholangiocarcinoma, arises from the biliary epithelium of the small ducts in the periphery of the liver (intrahepatic) and the main ducts of the hilum (extrahepatic), extending into the gallbladder. The incidence and epidemiology of biliary tract cancer are fluid and complex. It is shown that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is on the rise in the Western world, and gallbladder cancer is on the decline. Radiation therapy has emerged as an important component of adjuvant therapy for resected disease and definitive therapy for locally advanced disease. The emerging sophisticated techniques of imaging tumors and conformal dose delivery are expanding the indications for radiotherapy in the management of bile duct tumors. As we understand more about the molecular pathways driving biliary tract cancers, targeted therapies are at the forefront of new therapeutic combinations. Understanding the gene expression profile and mutational burden in biliary tract cancer allows us to better discern the pathogenesis and identify promising new developmental therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Bridgewater
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Aparna Kalyan
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mahadevan A, Dagoglu N, Mancias J, Raven K, Khwaja K, Tseng JF, Ng K, Enzinger P, Miksad R, Bullock A, Evenson A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Intrahepatic and Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. J Cancer 2015; 6:1099-104. [PMID: 26516357 PMCID: PMC4615345 DOI: 10.7150/jca.13032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Unresectable intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinomas carry a dismal prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy and conventional external beam radiation and brachytherapy have been used with limited success. We explored the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for these patients. Methods: Patients with unresectable intrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma or those with positive margins were included in this study. Systemic therapy was used at the discretion of the medical oncologist. The CyberknifeTM stereotactic body radiotherapy system used to treat these patients. Patients were treated with three daily fractions. Clinical and radiological follow-up were performed every three months. Results: 34 patients (16 male and 18 female) with 42 lesions were included in this study. There were 32 unresectable tumors and two patients with resected tumors with positive margins. The median SBRT dose was 30Gy in three fractions. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 8-71 months). The actuarial local control rate was 79%. The median overall survival was 17 months and the median progression free survival was ten months. There were four Grade III toxicities (12%), including duodenal ulceration, cholangitis and liver abscess. Conclusions: SBRT is an effective and reasonably safe local therapy option for unresectable intrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Mahadevan
- 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nergiz Dagoglu
- 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joseph Mancias
- 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kristin Raven
- 2. Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Khalid Khwaja
- 2. Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer F Tseng
- 2. Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter Enzinger
- 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rebecca Miksad
- 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrea Bullock
- 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy Evenson
- 2. Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mansour JC, Aloia TA, Crane CH, Heimbach JK, Nagino M, Vauthey JN. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17:691-9. [PMID: 26172136 PMCID: PMC4527854 DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 277] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
An American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA)-sponsored consensus meeting of expert panellists met on 15 January 2014 to review current evidence on the management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in order to establish practice guidelines and to agree consensus statements. It was established that the treatment of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach to optimize the chances for both durable survival and effective palliation. An adequate diagnostic and staging work-up includes high-quality cross-sectional imaging; however, pathologic confirmation is not required prior to resection or initiation of a liver transplant trimodal treatment protocol. The ideal treatment for suitable patients with resectable hilar malignancy is resection of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts, as well as resection of the involved ipsilateral liver. Preoperative biliary drainage is best achieved with percutaneous transhepatic approaches and may be indicated for patients with cholangitis, malnutrition or hepatic insufficiency. Portal vein embolization is a safe and effective strategy for increasing the future liver remnant (FLR) and is particularly useful for patients with an FLR of <30%. Selected patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma should be evaluated for a standard trimodal protocol incorporating external beam and endoluminal radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy and liver transplantation. Post-resection chemoradiation should be offered to patients who show high-risk features on surgical pathology. Chemoradiation is also recommended for patients with locally advanced, unresectable hilar cancers. For patients with locally recurrent or metastatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma, first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is recommended based on multiple Phase II trials and a large randomized controlled trial including a heterogeneous population of patients with biliary cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Mansour
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas SouthwesternDallas, TX, USA,Correspondence John C. Mansour, Division of Surgical Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. Tel: + 1 214 648 5870. Fax: + 1 214 648 1118. E-mail:
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, TX, USA
| | | | - Masato Nagino
- Department of Surgery, Nagoya UniversityNagoya, Japan
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
The Role of Radiotherapy and Chemoradiation in the Management of Primary Liver Tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 26:569-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2014] [Revised: 02/18/2014] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
35
|
Chopra S, Mathew AS, Engineer R, Shrivastava SK. Positioning high-dose radiation in multidisciplinary management of unresectable cholangiocarcinomas: review of current evidence. Indian J Gastroenterol 2014; 33:401-7. [PMID: 25135161 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-014-0495-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/07/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the bile ducts. The current standard of care for unresectable nonmetastatic disease is doublet systemic chemotherapy, which provides a median survival of 11.7 months. Although chemoradiation is a therapeutic option that provides almost equivalent or superior survival, the lack of level I evidence presents a major hurdle in routinely recommending it within multidisciplinary clinics. This mini review presents the current evidence on the use of chemoradiation for unresectable nonmetastatic cholangiocarcinoma and rationale for positioning it within multidisciplinary management of unresectable cholangiocarcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410 210, India,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yoshioka Y, Ogawa K, Oikawa H, Onishi H, Kanesaka N, Tamamoto T, Kosugi T, Hatano K, Kobayashi M, Ito Y, Takayama M, Takemoto M, Karasawa K, Nagakura H, Imai M, Kosaka Y, Yamazaki H, Isohashi F, Nemoto K, Nishimura Y. Impact of intraluminal brachytherapy on survival outcome for radiation therapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer: a propensity-score matched-pair analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 89:822-9. [PMID: 24969796 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2014] [Revised: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 04/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether adding intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) to definitive radiation therapy (RT) for unresectable biliary tract cancer has a positive impact on survival outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS The original cohort comprised 209 patients, including 153 who underwent external beam RT (EBRT) alone and 56 who received both ILBT and EBRT. By matching propensity scores, 56 pairs (112 patients) consisting of 1 patient with and 1 patient without ILBT were selected. They were well balanced in terms of sex, age, performance status, clinical stage, jaundice, and addition of chemotherapy. The impact of ILBT on overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and local control (LC) was investigated. RESULTS The 2-year OS rates were 31% for the ILBT+ group and 40% for theILBT- group (P=.862). The 2-year DSS rates were 42% for the ILBT+ group and 41% for the ILBT- group (P=.288). The 2-year LC rates were 65% for the ILBT+ group and 35% for the ILBT- group (P=.094). Three of the 4 sensitivity analyses showed a significantly better LC for the ILBT+ group (P=.010, .025, .049), and another showed a marginally better LC (P=.068), and none of the sensitivity analyses showed any statistically significant differences in OS or DSS. CONCLUSIONS In the treatment for unresectable biliary tract cancer, the addition of ILBT to RT has no impact on OS or DSS but is associated with better LC. Therefore, the role of ILBT should be addressed by other measures than survival benefit, for example, by less toxicity, prolonged biliary tract patency decreasing the need for further palliative interventions, or patient quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Yoshioka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Hirobumi Oikawa
- Department of Radiology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Naoto Kanesaka
- Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Tamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University of Medicine, Nara, Japan
| | - Takashi Kosugi
- Department of Radiology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kazuo Hatano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masao Kobayashi
- Department of Radiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makoto Takayama
- Department of Radiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Katsuyuki Karasawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisayasu Nagakura
- Department of Radiology, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Michiko Imai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwata City Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kosaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Isohashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenji Nemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Nishimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kim HM, Lee KJ, Cha J, Chung MJ, Bang S, Seong J, Song SY, Park SW. A pilot study of S-1-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2014; 74:861-5. [DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2565-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
38
|
Hematulin A, Sagan D, Sawanyawisuth K, Seubwai W, Wongkham S. Association between cellular radiosensitivity and G1/G2 checkpoint proficiencies in human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines. Int J Oncol 2014; 45:1159-66. [PMID: 24969815 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a destructive malignancy with a poor prognosis and lack of effective medical treatment. Radiotherapy is an alternative treatment for patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. However, there are limited data on the radiation responsiveness of individual cholangiocarcinoma cells, which is a key factor that influences radiation treatment outcome. In this study, we found that cholangiocarcinoma cell lines differ remarkably in their radiosensitivity. The variation of radiosensitivity of cholangiocarcinoma cells correlates with their p53 status and existing G1 and/or G2 checkpoint defects. We also demonstrated the potential of checkpoint kinase Chk1/2 inhibition on the enhancement of the radiosensitivity of cholangiocarcinoma cells. Thus, this study provides useful information for predicting radiation response and provides evidence for the enchantment of radiotherapeutic efficiency by targeting checkpoint kinase Chk1/2 in some subpopulations of cholangiocarcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arunee Hematulin
- Radiobiology Research Laboratory, Department of Radiation Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
| | - Daniel Sagan
- Independent Researcher, D-93051 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Kanlayanee Sawanyawisuth
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Wunchana Seubwai
- Department of Forensic Science, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Sopit Wongkham
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Mattiucci GC, Autorino R, D’Agostino GR, Deodato F, Macchia G, Perri V, Tringali A, Morganti AG, Mutignani M, Valentini V. Chemoradiation and brachytherapy in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2014; 90:58-67. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2013] [Revised: 09/25/2013] [Accepted: 10/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
41
|
Yao D, Kunam VK, Li X. A review of the clinical diagnosis and therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. J Int Med Res 2013; 42:3-16. [PMID: 24366497 DOI: 10.1177/0300060513505488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy worldwide. The incidence of intrahepatic CCA is increasing, whereas that of extrahepatic CCA is decreasing. This review looks at the new advances that have been made in the management of CCA, based on a PubMed and Science Citation Index search of results from randomized controlled trials, reviews, and cohort, prospective and retrospective studies. Aggressive interventional approaches and new histopathological techniques have been developed to make a histological diagnosis in patients with high risk factors or suspected CCA. Resectability of the tumour can now be assessed using multiple radiological imaging studies; the main prognostic factor after surgery is a histologically negative resection margin. Biliary drainage and/or portal vein embolization may be performed before extended radical resection, or liver transplantation may be undertaken in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Though many advances have been made in the management of CCA, the standard modality of treatment has not yet been established. This review focuses on the clinical options for different stages of CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denghua Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Interventional Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | | | - Xiao Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Interventional Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Moureau-Zabotto L, Turrini O, Resbeut M, Raoul JL, Giovannini M, Poizat F, Piana G, Delpero JR, Bertucci F. Impact of radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:568. [PMID: 24299517 PMCID: PMC4219485 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2013] [Accepted: 11/05/2013] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal therapy for patients with unresectable locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ULAC) remains controversial. We analysed the role of radiotherapy in the management of such tumors. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients treated in our institution with conformal-3D external-beam-radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy. RESULTS Thirty patients were included: 24 with a primary tumor (group 1) and 6 with a local relapse (group 2). Toxicity was low. Among 25 patients assessable for EBRT response, we observed 9 complete responses, 4 partial responses, 10 stabilisations, and 2 progressions. The median follow-up was 12 months. Twenty out of 30 patients (66%) experienced a relapse, which was metastatic in 75% of cases in the whole series, 87% in group 1, 60% in group 2 (p = 0.25). Twenty-eight patients (93%) died of relapse or disease complications. Median overall survivals in the whole group and in group 1 or 2 were respectively 12, 11 and 21 months (p = 0.11). The 1-year and 3-year progression-free survivals were respectively 38% and 16% in the whole series; 31% and 11% in group 1, 67% and 33% in group 2 (p = 0.35). CONCLUSION EBRT seems efficient to treat ULAC, with acceptable toxicity. For primary disease, the high rate of metastatic relapse suggests to limit EBRT to non-progressive patients after induction chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Moureau-Zabotto
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Turaga KK, Tsai S, Wiebe LA, Evans DB, Gamblin TC. Novel multimodality treatment sequencing for extrahepatic (mid and distal) cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 20:1230-9. [PMID: 23064778 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2648-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2012] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation has demonstrated significant advantages in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A similar tumor in a nearby anatomical location is extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, which has proven to be largely unresponsive to current forms of therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma has been combined with surgical resection and/or liver transplantation with a 25-33 % complete pathological response rate. We propose a wider application of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma and present our rationale for this form of treatment sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran K Turaga
- Department of Surgery, Dvision of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|