Parameters favorable to intraprostatic radiation dose escalation in men with localized prostate cancer

Focal Boost in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: A Review of Planning Studies and Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Focal boost radiotherapy was developed to deliver elevated doses to functional sub-volumes within a target. Such a technique was hypothesized to improve treatment outcomes without increasing toxicity in prostate cancer treatment.

PURPOSE

To summarize and evaluate the efficacy and variability of focal boost radiotherapy by reviewing focal boost planning studies and clinical trials that have been published in the last ten years.

METHODS

Published reports of focal boost radiotherapy, that specifically incorporate dose escalation to intra-prostatic lesions (IPLs), were reviewed and summarized. Correlations between acute/late ≥G2 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and clinical factors were determined by a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

By reviewing and summarizing 34 planning studies and 35 trials, a significant dose escalation to the GTV and thus higher tumor control of focal boost radiotherapy were reported consistently by all reviewed studies. Reviewed trials reported a not significant difference in toxicity between focal boost and conventional radiotherapy. Acute ≥G2 GU and late ≥G2 GI toxicities were reported the most and least prevalent, respectively, and a negative correlation was found between the rate of toxicity and proportion of low-risk or intermediate-risk patients in the cohort.

CONCLUSION

Focal boost prostate cancer radiotherapy has the potential to be a new standard of care.

Radiotherapy planning in a prostate cancer phantom model with intraprostatic dominant lesions using stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arcs and a simultaneous integrated boost

Aim

In the treatment of prostate cancer with radiation therapy, the addition of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL) may improve local control. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal radiation strategy in a phantom model of prostate cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT-VMAT) with a SIB of 1-4 DILs.

Methods

We designed and printed a three-dimensional anthropomorphic phantom pelvis to simulate individual patient structures, including the prostate gland. A total of 36.25 Gy (SBRT) was delivered to the whole prostate. The DILs were irradiated with four different doses (40, 45, 47.5, and 50 Gy) to assess the influence of different SIB doses on dose distribution. The doses were calculated, verified, and measured using both transit and non-transit dosimetry for patient-specific quality assurance using a phantom model.

Results

The dose coverage met protocol requirements for all targets. However, the dose was close to violating risk constraints to the rectum when four DILs were treated simultaneously or when the DILs were located in the posterior segments of the prostate. All verification plans passed the assumed tolerance criteria.

Conclusions

Moderate dose escalation up to 45 Gy seems appropriate in cases with DILs located in posterior prostate segments or if there are three or more DILs located in other segments.

Prostate MRI in Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment Planning and Delivery for Localized Prostate Cancer

Prostate MRI is increasingly being used to make diagnoses and guide management for patients receiving definitive radiation treatment for prostate cancer. Radiologists should be familiar with the potential uses of prostate MRI in radiation therapy planning and delivery. Radiation therapy is an established option for the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an external-beam radiation therapy method used to deliver a high dose of radiation to an extracranial target in the body, often in five or fewer fractions. SBRT is increasingly being used for prostate cancer treatment and has been recognized by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network as an acceptable definitive treatment regimen for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. MRI is commonly used to aid in prostate radiation therapy. The authors review the uses of prostate MRI in SBRT treatment planning and delivery. Specific topics discussed include the use of prostate MRI for identification of and dose reduction to the membranous and prostatic urethra, which can decrease the risk of acute and late toxicities. MRI is also useful for identification and appropriate dose coverage of the prostate apex and areas of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion. In prospective studies, prostate MRI is being validated for identification of and dose intensification to dominant intraprostatic lesions, which potentially can improve oncologic outcomes. It also can be used to evaluate the placement of fiducial markers and hydrogel spacers for radiation therapy planning and delivery. ^©RSNA, 2022.

The feasibility of a dose painting procedure to treat prostate cancer based on mpMR images and hierarchical clustering

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the feasibility of a dose painting (DP) procedure, known as simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation Therapy (SIB-IMRT), for treating prostate cancer with dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs) based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance (mpMR) images and hierarchical clustering with a machine learning technique.

METHODS

The mpMR images of 120 patients were used to create hierarchical clustering and draw a dendrogram. Three clusters were selected for performing agglomerative clustering. Then, the DIL acquired from the mpMR images of 20 patients were categorized into three groups to have them treated with a DP procedure being composed of three planning target volumes (PTVs) determined as PTV1, PTV2, and PTV3 in treatment plans. The DP procedure was carried out on the patients wherein a total dose of 80, 85 and 91 Gy were delivered to the PTV1, PTV2, and PTV3, respectively. Dosimetric and radiobiologic parameters [Tumor Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP)] of the DP procedure were compared with those of the conventional IMRT and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) procedures carried out on another group of 20 patients. A post-treatment follow-up was also made four months after the radiotherapy procedures.

RESULTS

All the dosimetric variables and the NTCPs of the organs at risks (OARs) revealed no significant difference between the DP and IMRT procedures. Regarding the TCP of three investigated PTVs, significant differences were observed between the DP versus IMRT and also DP versus 3DCRT procedures. At post-treatment follow-up, the DIL volumes and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the DP group differed significantly (p-value < 0.001) from those of the IMRT. However, the whole prostate ADC and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) indicated no significant difference (p-value > 0.05) between the DP versus IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this comprehensive clinical trial illustrated the feasibility of our DP procedure for treating prostate cancer based on mpMR images validated with acquired patients' dosimetric and radiobiologic assessment and their follow-ups. This study confirms significant potential of the proposed DP procedure as a promising treatment planning to achieve effective dose escalation and treatment for prostate cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT20181006041257N1; Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, Registered: 23 October 2019, https://en.irct.ir/trial/34305 .

Deformable MR-CBCT prostate registration using biomechanically constrained deep learning networks

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiotherapeutic dose escalation to dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL) in prostate cancer could potentially improve tumor control. The purpose of this study was to develop a method to accurately register multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with CBCT images for improved DIL delineation, treatment planning, and dose monitoring in prostate radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We proposed a novel registration framework which considers biomechanical constraint when deforming the MR to CBCT. The registration framework consists of two segmentation convolutional neural networks (CNN) for MR and CBCT prostate segmentation, and a three-dimensional (3D) point cloud (PC) matching network. Image intensity-based rigid registration was first performed to initialize the alignment between MR and CBCT prostate. The aligned prostates were then meshed into tetrahedron elements to generate volumetric PC representation of the prostate shapes. The 3D PC matching network was developed to predict a PC motion vector field which can deform the MRI prostate PC to match the CBCT prostate PC. To regularize the network's motion prediction with biomechanical constraints, finite element (FE) modeling-generated motion fields were used to train the network. MRI and CBCT images of 50 patients with intraprostatic fiducial markers were used in this study. Registration results were evaluated using three metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and target registration error (TRE). In addition to spatial registration accuracy, Jacobian determinant and strain tensors were calculated to assess the physical fidelity of the deformation field.

RESULTS

The mean and standard deviation of our method were 0.93 ± 0.01, 1.66 ± 0.10 mm, and 2.68 ± 1.91 mm for DSC, MSD, and TRE, respectively. The mean TRE of the proposed method was reduced by 29.1%, 14.3%, and 11.6% as compared to image intensity-based rigid registration, coherent point drifting (CPD) nonrigid surface registration, and modality-independent neighborhood descriptor (MIND) registration, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We developed a new framework to accurately register the prostate on MRI to CBCT images for external beam radiotherapy. The proposed method could be used to aid DIL delineation on CBCT, treatment planning, dose escalation to DIL, and dose monitoring.

Margin verification for hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy using a novel dose accumulation workflow and iterative CBCT

PURPOSE

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer reduces the inconvenience of an extended treatment course but the appropriate treatment margin to ensure tumor control while minimizing toxicity is not standardized. Using a novel dose accumulation workflow with iterative CBCT (iCBCT) images, we were able to validate treatment margins.

METHODS

Sixteen patients treated to the prostate on a hypofractionated clinical trial were selected. Prescription dose was 3625 cGy to > 95% of the PTV in 5 fractions with a boost to 4000 cGy to the high risk GTV (if applicable). PTV margin expansion was 5 mm isotropic except 3 mm posterior, no margin for the GTV. Daily iCBCT images were obtained while practicing strict bladder and rectal filling protocols. Using a novel adaptive dose accumulation workflow, synthetic CTs were created and the daily delivered dose was recalculated. The daily dose distributions were accumulated and target coverage and organ dose were assessed.

RESULTS

Although the PTV coverage dropped for the accumulated dose, the prostate coverage was not compromised. The differences in bladder and anorectum dose were not significantly different. Four patients received a boost to the GTV and a significant decrease in coverage was noted in the accumulated dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel dose accumulation workflow demonstrated that daily iCBCT images can be used for dose accumulation. We found that our clinical treatment margins resulted in adequate dose to the prostate while sparing OARs. If the goal is to deliver the full dose to an intra-prostatic GTV, a margin may be appropriate.

A planning study of focal dose escalations to multiparametric MRI-defined dominant intraprostatic lesions in prostate proton radiation therapy

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric effect and clinical impact of delivering a focal radiotherapy boost dose to multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI)-defined dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs) in prostate cancer using proton therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 36 patients with pre-treatment mp-MRI and CT images who were treated using pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiation therapy to the whole prostate. DILs were contoured on co-registered mp-MRIs. Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) plans using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) were created based on conventional whole-prostate-irradiation for each patient and optimized with additional DIL coverage goals and urethral constraints. DIL dose coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing were compared between conventional and SIB plans. Tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were estimated to evaluate the clinical impact of the SIB plans.

RESULTS

Optimized SIB plans significantly escalated the dose to DILs while meeting OAR constraints. SIB plans were able to achieve 125, 150 and 175% of prescription dose coverage in 74, 54 and 17% of 36 patients, respectively. This was modeled to result in an increase in DIL TCP by 7.3-13.3% depending on α / β and DIL risk level.

CONCLUSION

The proposed mp-MRI-guided DIL boost using proton radiation therapy is feasible without violating OAR constraints and demonstrates a potential clinical benefit by improving DIL TCP. This retrospective study suggested the use of IMPT-based DIL SIB may represent a strategy to improve tumor control.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study investigated the planning of mp-MRI-guided DIL boost in prostate proton radiation therapy and estimated its clinical impact with respect to TCP and NTCP.

Prostate cancer treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy: Report on the 5-year outcome of a prospective series

How to define a clinical target volume (CTV) as small as possible for prostate cancer to reduce the dose received by normal organs is an interesting study. We conduct a research to analyze the clinical efficacy of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using reduced CTV in the treatment of prostate cancer. From January 2006 to June 2010, 78 patients with prostate cancer were treated with IMRT according to this institutional protocol. Of them, 18 had stage II tumors, 39 had stage III tumors, and 21 had stage IVa tumors. Clinical outcomes included overall survival, biochemical recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and acute and chronic injuries caused by radiotherapy. Risk factors were evaluated using the Cox regression model. As of December 31, 2014, all patients completed radiotherapy as planned. Myelosuppression was mostly grade 1, acute urinary injury was mostly grades 1 and 2, and intestinal injury was mostly grade 1. The 5-year follow-up rate was 91.0%. The overall, progression-free, biochemical recurrence-free, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 82.1%, 79.4%, 84.6%, and 94.9%, respectively. Tumor volumes defined by small target volumes and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were 274.21 ± 92.64 and 600.68 ± 113.72, respectively, representing a significant difference (P < .05). Age, prostate-specific antigen level, eastern cooperative oncology Group score, Gleason score, and volume of CTV were independent risk factors for mortality and disease progression. Our findings indicated that IMRT with reduced CTV have less acute and chronic injuries caused by radiation, particularly grade 3 or higher urinary and intestinal injuries, while ensuring survival benefits and protecting the hematopoietic function.

The delineation of intraprostatic boost regions for radiotherapy using multimodality imaging

Dose escalation to the prostate improves tumor control but at the expense of increased rectal toxicity. Modern imaging can be used to detect the most common site of recurrence, the intraprostatic lesion (IPL), which has led to the concept of focusing dose escalation to the IPL in order to improve the therapeutic ratio. Imaging must be able to detect lesions with adequate sensitivity and specificity to accurately delineate the IPL. This information must be carefully integrated into the radiotherapy planning process to ensure the dose is targeted to the IPL. This review will consider the role and challenges of multiparametric MRI and PET computed tomography in delineating a tumor boost to be delivered by external beam radiotherapy.

Twenty Fraction Prostate Radiotherapy with Intra-prostatic Boost: Results of a Pilot Study

AIMS

For patients with high-risk, locally bulky prostate cancer, an intra-prostatic boost to tumour volumes (dose-painting) offers a risk-adapted dose escalation. We evaluated the feasibility of hypofractionated dose-painting radiotherapy and the associated toxicity. The possibility to streamline a radiobiologically optimised planning protocol was also investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were treated using a dose-painting approach; boost volumes were identified with functional magnetic resonance imaging scans. The prostate dose outside the boost volume was 60 Gy in 20 fractions, and the maximum integrated boost dose was set to 68 Gy, provided that the dose constraints to the organs at risk could be fulfilled. Rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used with daily image guidance and fiducial markers.

RESULTS

The boost dose was escalated to 68 Gy for 25 patients (median dose 69 Gy, range 68-70 Gy); for three patients the boost dose was 67 Gy, due to the proximity of the urethra and/or the rectum. The mean normal tissue complication probability for rectal bleeding was 4.7% (range 3.4-5.8%) and was 3.5% for faecal incontinence (range 2.3-5.0%). At a median follow-up of 38 months (range 32-45) there was no grade 3 toxicity. Two patients developed grade 2 genitourinary toxicity (7.1%) and none developed grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. The mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for 23 patients who had stopped the adjuvant hormone therapy with a normal testosterone was 0.27 ng/ml (0.02-0.72) at follow-up; two patients have suppressed PSA and testosterone after stopping 3 year adjuvant hormone and three patients have relapsed (one pelvic node, two PSA only) at 36, 12 and 42 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule, 60 Gy in 20 fractions with intra-prostatic boost dose of 68 Gy, can be achieved without exceeding dose constraints for organs at risk. Hypofractionated dose-painting escalated radiotherapy has an acceptable safety profile. The same planning protocol was used in a phase II single-arm trial (BIOPROP20: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02125175) and will further be used in a large phase III randomised trial (PIVOTALboost): patients will be randomised standard radiotherapy (60 Gy in 20 fractions) with or without lymph node radiotherapy versus dose-painting radiotherapy with or without lymph node radiotherapy; the trial will be opened for recruitment in summer 2017.

Rationale and protocol of AIRC IG-13218, short-term radiotherapy for early prostate cancer with concomitant boost to the dominant lesion

INTRODUCTION

Of the different treatments for early prostate cancer, hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy is one of the most interesting and studied options.

METHODS

The main objective of this phase II clinical study is to evaluate the feasibility, in terms of the incidence of acute side effects, of a new ultra-hypofractionated scheme for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with the latest imaging and radiotherapy technology, allowing dose escalation to the dominant intraprostatic lesion identified by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary endpoints of the study are the evaluation of the long-term tolerability of the treatment in terms of late side effects, quality of life, and efficacy (oncological outcome).

RESULTS

The study is ongoing, and we expect to complete recruitment by the end of 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

Like in previous studies, we expect ultra-hypofractionated radiation treatment for prostate cancer to be well tolerated and effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01913717.

Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions

Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences allow physicians to define the dominant intraprostatic lesion (IPL) in prostate radiation therapy treat-ments allowing for dose escalation and potentially increased tumor control. This work quantifies the margin required around the MRI-defined IPL accounting for both prostate motion and deformation. Ten patients treated with a simultaneous integrated intraprostatic boost (SIIB) were retrospectively selected and replanned with incremental 1 mm margins from 0-5 mm around the IPL to determine if there were any significant differences in dosimetric parameters. Sensitivity analysis was then performed accounting for random and systematic uncertainties in both prostate motion and deformation to ensure adequate dose was delivered to the IPL. Prostate deformation was assessed using daily CBCT imaging and implanted fiducial markers. The average IPL volume without margin was 2.3% of the PTV volume and increased to 11.8% with a 5 mm margin. Despite these changes in vol-ume, the only statistically significant dosimetric difference was found for the PTV maximum dose, which increased with increasing margin. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that a 3.0 mm margin ensures > 95% IPL coverage accounting for both motion and deformation. We found that a margin of 3.0 mm around the MRI defined IPL is sufficient to account for random and systematic errors in IPL posi-tion for the majority of cases.

Combining high dose external beam radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion: Analysis of genito-urinary and rectal toxicity

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Local recurrences after radiotherapy are dose-dependent and occur in the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined DIL on toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four-hundred and ten patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. A median dose of 78Gy was prescribed to the prostate. A SIB of 82Gy to the DIL was performed in 225 patients (SIB+). Genitourinary and rectal toxicity on fixed time points up to 8years were compared between SIB- (185 patients) and SIB+ patients. Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Kaplan-Meier statistics were applied. With a median follow up of 72months, the six-year actuarial risk of genitourinary and rectal toxicity grade⩾2 was 31% and 12% respectively. The actuarial risk of developing toxicity and incidence of symptoms at fixed time points were not increased with a SIB.

CONCLUSION

Performing a SIB did not increase genitourinary or rectal toxicity up to 8years' follow-up.

Prostate Dose-painting Radiotherapy and Radiobiological Guided Optimisation Enhances the Therapeutic Ratio

AIMS

To describe the treatment of 11 patients with radiobiologically guided dose-painting radiotherapy and report on toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Boost volumes were identified with functional magnetic resonance imaging scans in 11 patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Patients were treated using a dose-painting approach; the boost dose was limited to 86 Gy in 37 fractions, while keeping the rectal normal tissue complication probability to 5-6%. Rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used with daily image guidance and fiducial markers.

RESULTS

The median dose to the prostate (outside the boost volume) and urethra was 75.4 Gy/37 fractions (range 75.1-75.8 Gy), whereas the median boost dose was 83.4 Gy (range 79.0-87.4 Gy). The tumour control probability (TCP) (Marsden model) increased from 71% for the standard plans to 83.6% [76.6-86.8%] for the dose-painting boost plans. The mean (Lyman-Kutcher-Burman) normal tissue complication probability for rectal bleeding was 5.2% (range 3.3-6.2%) and 5.2% for faecal incontinence (range 3.6-7.8%). All patients tolerated the treatment well, with a low acute toxicity profile. At a median follow-up of 36 months (range 24-50) there was no grade 3 late toxicity. Two patients had grade 2 late urinary toxicity (urethral stricture, urinary frequency and urgency), one patient had grade 1 and one grade 2 late rectal toxicity. The mean prostate-specific antigen at follow-up was 0.81 ng/ml after stopping hormone therapy; one patient relapsed biochemically at 32 months (2.70 ng/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

The toxicity for this radiobiological guided dose-painting protocol was low, but we have only treated a small cohort with limited follow-up time. The advantages of this treatment approach should be established in a clinical trial.

(68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a new technique with high potential for the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy is the main therapeutic approach besides surgery of localized prostate cancer. It relies on risk stratification and exact staging. This report analyses the potential of [(68)Ga]Glu-urea-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC ((68)Ga-PSMA-11), a new positron emission tomography (PET) tracer targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for prostate cancer staging and individualized radiotherapy planning.

METHODS

A cohort of 57 patients with prostate cancer scanned with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for radiotherapy planning was retrospectively reviewed; 15 patients were at initial diagnosis and 42 patients at time of biochemical recurrence. Staging results of conventional imaging, including bone scintigraphy, CT or MRI, were compared with (68)Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT results and the influence on radiotherapeutic management was quantified.

RESULTS

(68)Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT had a dramatic impact on radiotherapy application in the presented cohort. In 50.8 % of the cases therapy was changed.

CONCLUSION

The presented imaging technique of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT could be a key technology for individualized radiotherapy management in prostate cancer.

A sector-based dosimetric analysis of dose heterogeneity in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

High-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy delivers a heterogeneous dose distribution throughout the prostate gland. There is however limited information regarding the spatial distribution of this dose heterogeneity. To this end, we analyzed the magnitude and location of intraprostatic dose heterogeneity in HDR prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five consecutive prostate cancer patients treated with HDR were analyzed. Based on CT-simulation images, each prostate was divided into three sections (apex, base, and mid-gland). These were further subdivided into eight symmetrical sections to give a total of 24 sections. Dose-volume histograms were analyzed from V100-V200% for these 24 sections comparing the means of individual regions, left vs right, apex vs base vs mid-gland, lateral vs medial, and anterior vs posterior. A separate analysis on dose as a function of individual region volume was also performed.

RESULTS

Analyses comparing the 24 regions showed a maximum 62% difference (range, 21.9-83.9%) at V130% and 19.9% (1.9-20.8%) at V200%. Seven regions were significantly decreased and one significantly elevated from V130-V180% when compared with the mean. The means for lateral sections were 1.57-fold higher than medial sections from V110-V200% (p < 0.0001). The dose at the base was significantly higher than the rest of the gland from V120-V200 (V150, 35.6 ± 16.2% vs 20.9 ± 13.1%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant intra-prostatic dose heterogeneity in prostate HDR brachytherapy. This is most notable in the increased dose to base and lateral portions of the gland. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of heterogeneity on clinical outcomes.

Whole prostate volume and shape changes with the use of an inflatable and flexible endorectal coil

Purpose. To determine to what extent an inflatable endorectal coil (ERC) affects whole prostate (WP) volume and shape during prostate MRI. Materials and Methods. 79 consecutive patients underwent T2W MRI at 3T first with a 6-channel surface coil and then with the combination of a 16-channel surface coil and ERC in the same imaging session. WP volume was assessed by manually contouring the prostate in each T2W axial slice. PSA density was also calculated. The maximum anterior-posterior (AP), left-right (LR), and craniocaudal (CC) prostate dimensions were measured. Changes in WP prostate volume, PSA density, and prostate dimensions were then evaluated. Results. In 79 patients, use of an ERC yielded no significant change in whole prostate volume (0.6 ± 5.7%, P = 0.270) and PSA density (−0.2 ± 5.6%, P = 0.768). However, use of an ERC significantly decreased the AP dimension of the prostate by −8.6 ± 7.8% (P < 0.001), increased LR dimension by 4.5 ± 5.8% (P < 0.001), and increased the CC dimension by 8.8 ± 6.9% (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Use of an ERC in prostate MRI results in the shape deformation of the prostate gland with no significant change in the volume of the prostate measured on T2W MRI. Therefore, WP volumes calculated on ERC MRI can be reliably used in clinical workflow.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer: long-term outcome of Chinese patients

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate acute adverse events and efficacy of three-dimensional intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients were treated with three-dimensional IMRT combined with maximum androgen blockade. The correlation between radiation-induced rectal injury and clinical factors was further analyzed.

RESULTS

After treatment, 21 patients had complete remission (CR), 37 had partial remission (PR), and nine had stable disease (SD), with an overall response rate of 86.5%. The follow-up period ranged from 12.5 to 99.6 months. Thirty-nine patients had a follow-up time of ≥ five years. In this group, three-year and five-year overall survival rates were 89% and 89.5%, respectively; three-year and five-year progression-free survival rates were 72% and 63%. In univariate analyses, gross tumor volume was found to be prognostic for survival (χ2 = 5.70, P = 0.037). Rates of leucopenia and anemia were 91.1% and 89.5%, respectively. Two patients developed acute liver injury, and a majority of patients developed acute radiation proctitis and cystitis, mainly grade 1/2. Tumor volume before treatment was the only prognostic factor influencing the severity of acute radiation proctitis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT combined with endocrine therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and was well tolerated in patients with intermediate and advanced prostate cancer.

Prostate stereotactic ablative radiation therapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy to dominant intraprostatic lesions

PURPOSE

To investigate boosting dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs) in the context of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) and to examine the impact on tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten prostate datasets were selected. DILs were defined using T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Four plans were produced for each dataset: (1) no boost to DILs; (2) boost to DILs, no seminal vesicles in prescription; (3) boost to DILs, proximal seminal vesicles (proxSV) prescribed intermediate dose; and (4) boost to DILs, proxSV prescribed higher dose. The prostate planning target volume (PTV) prescription was 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions. DILs were initially prescribed 115% of the PTV(Prostate) prescription, and PTV(DIL) prescriptions were increased in 5% increments until organ-at-risk constraints were reached. TCP and NTCP calculations used the LQ-Poisson Marsden, and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models respectively.

RESULTS

When treating the prostate alone, the median PTV(DIL) prescription was 125% (range: 110%-140%) of the PTV(Prostate) prescription. Median PTV(DIL) D50% was 55.1 Gy (range: 49.6-62.6 Gy). The same PTV(DIL) prescriptions and similar PTV(DIL) median doses were possible when including the proxSV within the prescription. TCP depended on prostate α/β ratio and was highest with an α/β ratio = 1.5 Gy, where the additional TCP benefit of DIL boosting was least. Rectal NTCP increased with DIL boosting and was considered unacceptably high in 5 cases, which, when replanned with an emphasis on reducing maximum dose to 0.5 cm(3) of rectum (Dmax(0.5cc)), as well as meeting existing constraints, resulted in considerable rectal NTCP reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

Boosting DILs in the context of SABR is technically feasible but should be approached with caution. If this therapy is adopted, strict rectal constraints are required including Dmax(0.5cc). If the α/β ratio of prostate cancer is 1.5 Gy or less, then high TCP and low NTCP can be achieved by prescribing SABR to the whole prostate, without the need for DIL boosting.

Simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesions using different energy levels of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-arc therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the dosimetry of volumetric-arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a dynamic multileaf collimator using the Monte Carlo algorithm in the treatment of prostate cancer with and without simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) at different energy levels.

METHODS

The data of 15 biopsy-proven prostate cancer patients were evaluated. The prescribed dose was 78 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV78) including the prostate and seminal vesicles and 86 Gy (PTV86) in 39 fractions to the intraprostatic lesion, which was delineated by MRI or MR-spectroscopy.

RESULTS

PTV dose homogeneity was better for IMRT than VMAT at all energy levels for both PTV78 and PTV86. Lower rectum doses (V30-V50) were significantly higher with SIB compared with PTV78 plans in both IMRT and VMAT plans at all energy levels. The bladder doses at high dose level (V60-V80) were significantly higher in IMRT plans with SIB at all energy levels compared with PTV78 plans, but no significant difference was observed in VMAT plans. VMAT plans resulted in a significant decrease in the mean monitor units (MUs) for 6, 10, and 15 MV energy levels both in plans with and those without SIB.

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation to intraprostatic lesions with 86 Gy is safe without causing serious increase in organs at risk (OARs) doses. VMAT is advantageous in sparing OARs and requiring less MU than IMRT.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

VMAT with SIB to intraprostatic lesion is a feasible method in treating prostate cancer. Additionally, no dosimetric advantage of higher energy is observed.

Multi-parametric MRI-guided focal tumor boost using HDR prostate brachytherapy: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

This study investigates the feasibility of delivering focal boost dose to tumor regions, identified with multi-parametric MRI, in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI were acquired the day before treatment and analyzed retrospectively for 15 patients. Twelve patients had hormone therapy before the MRI scan. The tumor was delineated on MRI by a radiologist and registered to treatment planning transrectal ultrasound images. A margin based on analysis of delineation and registration uncertainties was applied to create a focal boost planning target volume (F-PTV). Delivered treatment plans were compared with focal boost plans optimized to increase F-PTV dose as much as allowed by urethral and rectal dose constraints.

RESULTS

Tumors were delineated in all patients with volumes 0.4-23.0cc. The margin for tumor delineation and image registration uncertainties was estimated to be 4.5 mm. For F-PTV, the focal boost treatment plans increased median D90 from 17.6 to 20.9 Gy and median V150 from 27.3% to 75.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-guided high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy focal tumor boost is feasible-tumor regions can be identified even after hormone therapy, and focal boost dose can be delivered without violating urethral and rectal dose constraints.

Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: which is the best planning method?

Background

The delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost to the intra-prostatic tumour nodule may improve local control. The ability to deliver such treatments with hypofractionated SBRT was attempted using RapidArc (Varian Medical systems, Palo Alto, CA) and Multiplan (Accuray inc, Sunnyvale, CA).

Materials and methods

15 patients with dominant prostate nodules had RapidArc and Multiplan plans created using a 5 mm isotropic margin, except 3 mm posteriorly, aiming to deliver 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions to the boost whilst treating the whole prostate to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. An additional RapidArc plan was created using an 8 mm isotropic margin, except 5 mm posteriorly, to account for lack of intrafraction tracking.

Results

Both RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable boost plans to a dose of 47.5 Gy in 5 fractions. The mean rectal doses were lower for RapidArc plans (D50 13.2 Gy vs 15.5 Gy) but the number of missed constraints was the same for both planning methods (11/75). When the margin was increased to 8 mm/5 mm for the RapidArc plans to account for intrafraction motion, 37/75 constraints were missed.

Conclusions

RapidArc and Multiplan can produce clinically acceptable simultaneous integrated boost plans, but the mean rectal D50 and D20 with RapidArc are lower. If the margins are increased to account for intrafraction motion, the RapidArc plans exceed at least one dose constraint in 13/15 cases. Delivering a simultaneous boost with hypofractionation appears feasible, but requires small margins needing intrafraction motion tracking.

La Radioterapia Nel Trattamento Del Carcinoma Della Prostata: Indicazioni, Evoluzione Tecnologica e Approcci Integrati

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous, indolent or sometimes aggressive tumor. Treatment options are various and without proved superiority. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a key role in the disease history. Technological evolution with Intensity Modulate Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) allowed improvement, with significant results on local control and survival. Hypofractionation, Stereotactic Body RT (SBRT) and new brachytherapy approachs are still under investigation, with promising opportunities. Adjuvant vs salvage postoperative RT, hormone association, prophylactic pelvic irradiation are still under debate, but guidelines express overlapping indications.

Multidisciplinary managements will be the future for care optimization, providing the best tool for holistic and informed patients' choice.

Boosting imaging defined dominant prostatic tumors: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Dominant cancer foci within the prostate are associated with sites of local recurrence post radiotherapy. In this systematic review we sought to address the question: "what is the clinical evidence to support differential boosting to an imaging defined GTV volume within the prostate when delivered by external beam or brachytherapy".

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify clinical series reporting the use of radiation boosts to imaging defined GTVs.

RESULTS

Thirteen papers describing 11 unique patient series and 833 patients in total were identified. Methods and details of GTV definition and treatment varied substantially between series. GTV boosts were on average 8 Gy (range 3-35 Gy) for external beam, or 150% for brachytherapy (range 130-155%) and GTV volumes were small (<10 ml). Reported toxicity rates were low and may reflect the modest boost doses, small volumes and conservative DVH constraints employed in most studies. Variability in patient populations, study methodologies and outcomes reporting precluded conclusions regarding efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a large cohort of patients treated differential boosts to imaging defined intra-prostatic targets, conclusions regarding optimal techniques and/or efficacy of this approach are elusive, and this approach cannot be considered standard of care. There is a need to build consensus and evidence. Ongoing prospective randomized trials are underway and will help to better define the role of differential prostate boosts based on imaging defined GTVs.