Prognostic Importance of Small Prostate Size in Men Receiving Definitive Prostate Brachytherapy

The prognosis of patients with prostate cancer receiving permanent seed implantation stratified by prostate volume: Should we be reluctant to treat with brachytherapy because of a very small prostate (<15 cc)?

PURPOSE

We evaluated the treatment outcomes of different prostate volumes (PVs), <15 cc, 15-20 cc, and > 20 cc, in patients with prostate cancer who underwent permanent seed implantation (PI) ± external beam radiation therapy ± hormone therapy in a national Japanese prospective cohort study (J-POPS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of the 6721 patients in J-POPS from 2005 to 2011, 6652 were included in the analysis population. We categorized the patients into the following three PV groups: <15 cc, 15-20 cc, and > 20 cc. We evaluated the effect of PV on biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality (ACM) using the Phoenix definition and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 60.0 months. Patients in each PV group was 491 (7.4%), 1118 (16.8%), and 5043 (75.8%), respectively. No difference was observed in bFFF (94.7%, 96.2%, and 95.7%, p = 0.407), PCSM (99.8%, 99.7%, and 99.8%, p = 0.682), and ACM (98.2%, 96.7%, and 97.2%, p = 0.119) at 5 years for each PV group. In univariate and multivariate analyses, PV was not associated with bFFF, PCSM, ACM, or grade 2 toxicity. The percentage of positive biopsies was the single most significant predictor for all treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results obtained by analyzing a very large Japanese prospective database showed no difference in treatment outcomes according to PV (<15 cc, 15-20 cc, and ˃20 cc). Our study confirmed that PI in small prostates (even < 15 cc) remains an effective treatment option.

Comparing CTVs for permanent prostate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To delineate the clinical target volume (CTV) in low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer, American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommends a CTV = prostate. ESTRO advocates a CTV = prostate + 3 mm excluding rectum and many authors use and recommend other different CTVs. This study aims to: (1) evaluate the appropriateness of these recommendations and (2) test the applicability of seed distributions on the different CTVs and contrast the dosimetric differences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-eight patients treated with (125)I seeds (dose 145 Gy; CTV = prostate) were studied. We established for every patient: (1) risk of extraprostatic extension (EPE), (2) adequacy of original plan to an extended CTV with 3 mm-margin (3) a new planning and seed distribution for this CTV and (4) comparison of dosimetry of both plans.

RESULTS

Mean risk of EPE was 28.46 %. Original plan, when applied to the extended CTV, resulted in unsatisfactory dosimetry. A plan was generated for the 98 extended CTVs meeting all dosimetric specifications.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of EPE is high enough to consider a 3 mm-margin around prostate necessary for all cases. A CTV = prostate + 3 mm except rectum as ESTRO recommends is feasible and would adjust planning to the most probable extension of the tumor.

Dosimetric quality and evolution of edema after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for small prostates: implications for the use of newer isotopes

PURPOSE

To characterize prostate swelling and dosimetry in patients with small prostate volumes (PVs) undergoing brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We studied 25 patients with PV <25 cc (range, 15.1-24.8) and 65 patients with PV ≥25 cc (range, 25.0-66.2) based on three-dimensional ultrasound contours who underwent brachytherapy monotherapy with intraoperative planning. Postoperative Days 1 and 30 dosimetry was done by CT-MRI fusion.

RESULTS

Small PVs had greater Day 1 swelling than large PVs (32.5% increase in volume vs. 23.7%, p = 0.04), but by Day 30, swelling was minimal and not significantly different (p = 0.44). Small PVs had greater seed and needle densities at implant (p < 0.001). Rectal and urethral doses were nearly identical by Day 30 (small PV rectum receiving 100% of the prescription dose [145 Gy] [V100] = 0.32 cc; large PV rectum V100 = 0.33 cc, p = 0.99; small PV urethra receiving 150% of the prescription dose [145 Gy] [V150] = 0.20, large PV urethra V150 = 0.20, p = 0.91). Swelling at Day 1 created some cool implants (rate dose that covers 90% of the prostate volume [D90 <140 Gy = 12.0% and 9.4% for the small and large PV groups, respectively, p = 0.71), but Day 30 planning target volume coverage was excellent (rate D90 <140 Gy = 0% for both groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Although smaller prostates have greater Day 1 swelling, good Day 30 dosimetry can be achieved, making them excellent candidates for (125)I seeds (half-life [t½] = 60 days). Smaller prostates may be suboptimal for shorter t½ sources such as (131)Cs (t½ = 9.7 days), in which the majority of the dose may be delivered to an edematous gland, unless the planning is adjusted to anticipate the edema.