Radiation therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Proton beam irradiation with anti-VEGF therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: results of a 24-month, phase II randomized study

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of proton beam irradiation (PBI) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV)/ aneurysmal type 1 macular neovascularization (AT1).

METHODS

The randomized clinical trial consisted of newly diagnosed active PCV/AT1 patients who were randomized 1:1 to treatment with three initial monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF agent (conbercept) injections with or without single 14 GyE radiation. Subsequent anti-VEGF therapy was given pro re nata. The primary outcome measures were number of anti-VEGF injections, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central retinal thickness (CRT) at 24 months. Secondary outcome measures included the polypoidal lesion regression rate, changes in the areas of polypoidal lesions and branching vascular network (BVN), and radiotherapy-related adverse events at 24 months.

RESULTS

A total of 45 eyes (86.5%) completed the 24-month follow-up. At 24 months, the combination therapy group required fewer anti-VEGF injections compared with the monotherapy group (5.9 ± 4.1 vs. 8.8 ± 5.3; P = 0.04). The mean gains in BCVA and the mean decrease in CRT were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.85 and P = 0.17, respectively). Combination therapy was superior to monotherapy for complete polypoidal lesion regression (80.0% vs. 48%, P = 0.03) and change in BVN area (- 1.03 ± 1.24 mm2 vs. 0.36 ± 0.77 mm2, P < 0.01). The radiation-related microvascular abnormalities were observed in 55.0% of eyes following combination therapy at 15.7 ± 2.5 months.

CONCLUSION

PBI (14 GyE) combined with anti-VEGF therapy could decrease the need for additional anti-VEGF injections for PCV/AT1. Longer follow-up is needed to fully evaluate the long-term safety of PBI.

KEY MESSAGES

What is known The current main methods for treating PCV/AT1 include anti-VEGF drugs as monotherapy or in combination with photodynamic therapy. However, some cases can be challenging with multiple repeated injections due to the relatively low regression rate of polyps and high recurrence rate. What is new Proton beam irradiation therapy with anti-VEGF drugs can synergistically promote the regression of polyps and the shrinkage of branching vascular network, and reduce the anti-VEGF treatment burden for patients with PCV/AT1. Radiation retinopathy was mild and did not appear to be visually significant at the 24-month follow-up. Proton beam irradiation can be a new strategy for the treatment of PCV/AT1.

High-Dose-Rate Yttrium-90 (90Y) Episcleral Plaque Brachytherapy for Iris and Iridociliary Melanoma

Purpose

To describe a pilot study on the use of single-session, high-dose-rate, Food and Drug Administration-cleared, yttrium-90 (Y90) plaque brachytherapy for iris and iridociliary melanoma.

Design

A single-center, clinical case series.

Participants

Six consecutive patients were included in this study. Each was diagnosed with an iris or iridociliary melanoma based on clinical examination with or without biopsy.

Methods

Each tumor was staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria and received Y90 eye plaque brachytherapy. The main variables were tumor size, patient age, sex, and method of diagnosis (clinical or biopsy). Surgical techniques, treatment durations, and ocular side effects were recorded. Local control was defined as a lack of tumor growth or regression determined by clinical examinations, including slit-lamp and gonio photography, as well as high-frequency ultrasound measurements. Toxicity parameters included acute and short-term corneal/scleral change, anterior segment inflammation, and cataract progression.

Main Outcome Measures

Local and systemic cancer control, tumor regression, visual acuity, as well as radiation-related normal tissue toxicity.

Results

High-dose-rate Y90 plaque brachytherapy was used to treat small (American Joint Committee on Cancer cT1) category melanomas. Single-surgery high-dose-rate irradiations were performed under anesthesia. Because of short treatment durations, high-dose-rate Y90 did not require the additional procedures used for low-dose-rate plaque (e.g., sutures, amniotic membrane epicorneal buffering, Gunderson flaps, and second surgeries for plaque removal). Only conjunctival recession was used to avoid normal tissue irradiation. High-dose-rate Y90 treatment durations averaged 8.8 minutes (median, 7.9; range, 5.8-12.9). High-dose-rate Y90 brachytherapy was associated with no periorbital, corneal (Descemet folds), or conjunctival edema. There was no acute or short-term anterior uveitis, secondary cataract, scleropathy, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, or optic neuropathy. The follow-up was a mean of 16.0 (range 12-24) months. Evidence of local control included a lack of expansion of tumor borders (n = 6, 100%), darkening with or without atrophy of the tumor surface (n = 5/6, 83%), and a mean 24.5% reduction in ultrasonographically measured tumor thickness. There were no cases of metastatic disease.

Conclusions

High-dose-rate Y90 brachytherapy allowed for single-surgery, minimally invasive, outpatient irradiation of iris and iridociliary melanomas.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Yttrium-90 Episcleral Plaque Brachytherapy for Choroidal Melanoma

Purpose: To describe the first use of high-dose-rate yttrium-90 disc brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma. Methods: A 72-year-old patient had a cT1-category choroidal melanoma characterized by the presence of orange pigment, increasing subretinal fluid (SRF), and enlarging tumor thickness. It was treated with single-session, light-guided, light-defined yttrium-90-disc brachytherapy. Results: A specialized handheld applicator provided with 4 encircling lights was used to guide plaque placement and localize treatment. Unlike low-dose-rate plaques, high-dose-rate yttrium-90 required only 3 minutes 39 seconds. In this case, treatment did not require episcleral sutures, muscle relocation, outpatient dwell time, or a second surgery. High-dose-rate treatment improved radiation safety by eliminating perioperative exposure to health care personnel, the community, and the family. At the 13-month follow-up, the SRF and tumor thickness were diminished. There was no secondary cataract, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, or optic neuropathy, and the visual acuity was 20/20. Conclusions: Yttrium-90 brachytherapy allowed for single-surgery, minimally invasive, outpatient irradiation of a choroidal melanoma.

First clinical implementation of Yttrium-90 Disc Brachytherapy after FDA clearance

PURPOSE

Herein, we study if high-dose-rate (HDR) yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) brachytherapy could be utilized by medical physicists, radiation oncologists, and ophthalmic surgeons.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) beta-emitting brachytherapy sources received United States Food and Drug Administration clearance for episcleral treatment of ocular tumors and benign growths. Dose calibration traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology as well as treatment planning and target delineation methods were established. Single-use systems included a ⁹⁰Y-disc affixed within specialized, multifunction, handheld applicator. Low-dose-rate to high-dose-rate prescription conversions and depth-dose determinations were performed. Radiation safety was evaluated based on live exposure rates during assembly and surgeries. Clinical data for radiation safety, treatment tolerability, and local control was collected.

RESULTS

Practice parameters for the medical physicist, radiation oncologist, and ophthalmic surgeon were defined. Device sterilizations, calibrations, assemblies, surgical methods, and disposals were reproducible and effective. Treated tumors included iris melanoma, iridociliary melanoma, choroidal melanoma, and a locally invasive squamous carcinoma. Mean calculated ⁹⁰Y disc activity was 14.33 mCi (range 8.8-16.6), prescription dose 27.8 Gy (range 22-30), delivered to depth of 2.3 mm (range 1.6-2.6), at treatment durations of 420 s (7.0 min, range 219 s-773 s). Both insertion and removal were performed during one surgical session. After surgery, each disc-applicator- system was contained for decay in storage. Treatments were well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR ⁹⁰Y episcleral brachytherapy devices were created, implementation methods developed, and treatments performed on 6 patients. Treatments were single-surgery, rapid, and well-tolerated with short-term follow up.

One-Year Efficacy and Safety of Proton-Beam Irradiation Combined with Intravitreal Conbercept for Refractory or Recurrent Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Pilot Study

Introduction

To investigate the efficacy and safety of proton-beam irradiation (PBI) combined with intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection for refractory or recurrent polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

Methods

A prospective interventional clinical trial included 12 patients with refractory PCV (defined as persistent exudation or fluid after six consecutive injections at monthly intervals and/or photodynamic therapy) or recurrent PCV (defined as new exudative signs after six monthly injections and/or photodynamic therapy) treated between January 2019 and September 2020. Every patient underwent single PBI (14 GyE) with concomitant IVC (0.5 mg) within 1 week and further doses of IVC were administered pro re nata.

Results

By the 12-month follow-up, the subretinal fluid was completely absorbed in 9 eyes (81.8%). The angiographic regression and closure rates of the polyps were 60% (12/20) and 90% (18/20), respectively. The mean number of IVC injections was 3.1 ± 1.37. The mean BCVA improved by 20 letters (P = 0.006). The mean central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 476.50 ± 123.63 μm to 317.70 ± 89.34 μm (P = 0.004). The areas of branching vascular networks and polyps decreased by 37.2% and 72.3%, respectively. Radiation retinopathy was observed in five eyes, but no systemic adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

PBI combined with IVC appears to promote polyp regression and closure, reduce CMT, and improve BCVA, with a favorable safety profile, after 12 months. Therefore, PBI may be a useful adjuvant therapy for patients with refractory or recurrent PCV.

Trial Registration

Proton-Beam Irradiation Combined with Intravitreal Conbercept for Refractory or Recurrent Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Prospective Phase II Clinical Study (ChiCTR2000038987).

Ocular Therapeutics and Molecular Delivery Strategies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of vision loss in geriatric population. Intravitreal (IVT) injections are popular clinical option. Biologics and small molecules offer efficacy but relatively shorter half-life after intravitreal injections. To address these challenges, numerous technologies and therapies are under development. Most of these strategies aim to reduce the frequency of injections, thereby increasing patient compliance and reducing patient-associated burden. Unlike IVT frequent injections, molecular therapies such as cell therapy and gene therapy offer restoration ability hence gained a lot of traction. The recent approval of ocular gene therapy for inherited disease offers new hope in this direction. However, until such breakthrough therapies are available to the majority of patients, antibody therapeutics will be on the shelf, continuing to provide therapeutic benefits. The present review aims to highlight the status of pre-clinical and clinical studies of neovascular AMD treatment modalities including Anti-VEGF therapy, upcoming bispecific antibodies, small molecules, port delivery systems, photodynamic therapy, radiation therapy, gene therapy, cell therapy, and combination therapies.

Therapy of uveal melanoma A Review

The aim of intraocular melanoma therapy is to achieve local tumor control, reduce the risk of metastasis development, preserve the eyeball and possibly the visual function of the eye. The choice of therapeutic approach requires a comprehensive view and individual approach to each patient with uveal melanoma. Factors considered include local finding (location, tumor size and shape, tumor activity, central visual acuity, intraocular complications), age and the patients overall physical and psychological condition, as well as the patients wishes. The most widely used method of uveal melanoma treatment is radiotherapy. The effect of radiation is caused by the absorption of ionizing radiation energy, the effect of radiation on the cell is manifested by cell death (depletion), or by a cytogenetic information change (mutation). Brachytherapy uses scleral applicators with radionuclide - ruthenium (Ru-106) applicators dominate in Europe and iodine (I-125) applicators in the USA. In external radiotherapy, the source of ionizing radiation is outside the patients body. Both stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy are used. In the Czech Republic, treatment is carried out using Leksell gamma knife or CyberKnife, while proton therapy dominates in the world. The development of serious radiation complications (radiation retinopathy, neuropathy, neovascular glaucoma, toxic tumor syndrome, etc.) should be considered. Surgical therapy involves a variety of invasive procedures. Iridectomy is performed for iris melanoma. Anteriorly located choroidal melanomas and / or ciliary body melanomas can be resolved by transscleral resection (exoresection). For posterior choroidal melanomas, a combination of external tumor irradiation with pars plana vitrectomy is used. Enucleation is a method of choice in advanced tumors that cannot be effectively irradiated. Orbital exenteration is indicated in advanced tumors with extrabulbar spread or in relapsed tumor after previous enucleation.

Radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy has been proposed as a treatment for new vessel growth in people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of radiotherapy on neovascular AMD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and three trials registers and checked references of included studies. We last searched the databases on 4 May 2020.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials in which radiotherapy was compared to another treatment, sham treatment, low dosage irradiation or no treatment in people with choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to AMD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard procedures expected by Cochrane. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We considered the following outcomes at 12 months: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (loss of 3 or more lines, change in visual acuity), contrast sensitivity, new vessel growth, quality of life and adverse effects at any time point.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 18 studies (n = 2430 people, 2432 eyes) of radiation therapy with dosages ranging from 7.5 to 24 Gy. These studies mainly took place in Europe and North America but two studies were from Japan and one multicentre study included sites in South America. Three of these studies investigated brachytherapy (plaque and epimacular), the rest were studies of external beam radiotherapy (EBM) including one trial of stereotactic radiotherapy. Four studies compared radiotherapy combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) with anti-VEGF alone. Eleven studies gave no radiotherapy treatment to the control group; five studies used sham irradiation; and one study used very low-dose irradiation (1 Gy). One study used a mixture of sham irradiation and no treatment. Fifteen studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in one or more domains. Radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy There may be little or no difference in loss of 3 lines of vision at 12 months in eyes treated with radiotherapy compared with no radiotherapy (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.04, 811 eyes, 8 studies, I² = 66%, low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests a small benefit in change in visual acuity (mean difference (MD) -0.10 logMAR, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.03; eyes = 883; studies = 10) and average contrast sensitivity at 12 months (MD 0.15 log units, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.25; eyes = 267; studies = 2). Growth of new vessels (largely change in CNV size) was variably reported and It was not possible to produce a summary estimate of this outcome. The studies were small with imprecise estimates and there was no consistent pattern to the study results (very low-certainty evidence). Quality of life was only reported in one study of 199 people; there was no clear difference between treatment and control groups (low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence was available on adverse effects from eight of 14 studies. Seven studies reported on radiation retinopathy and/or neuropathy. Five of these studies reported no radiation-associated adverse effects. One study of 88 eyes reported one case of possible radiation retinopathy. One study of 74 eyes graded retinal abnormalities in some detail and found that 72% of participants who had radiation compared with 71% of participants in the control group had retinal abnormalities resembling radiation retinopathy or choroidopathy. Four studies reported cataract surgery or progression: events were generally few with no consistent evidence of any increased occurrence in the radiation group. One study noted transient disturbance of the precorneal tear film but there was no evidence from the other two studies that reported dry eye of any increased risk with radiation therapy. None of the participants received anti-VEGF injections. Radiotherapy combined with anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone People receiving radiotherapy/anti-VEGF were probably more likely to lose 3 or more lines of BCVA at 12 months compared with anti-VEGF alone (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.17, 1050 eyes, 3 studies, moderate-certainty). Most of the data for this outcome come from two studies of epimacular brachytherapy (114 events) compared with 20 events from the one trial of EBM. Data on change in BCVA were heterogenous (I² = 82%). Individual study results ranged from a small difference of -0.03 logMAR in favour of radiotherapy/anti-VEGF to a difference of 0.13 logMAR in favour of anti-VEGF alone (low-certainty evidence). The effect differed depending on how the radiotherapy was delivered (test for interaction P = 0.0007). Epimacular brachytherapy was associated with worse visual outcomes (MD 0.10 logMAR, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.15, 820 eyes, 2 studies) compared with EBM (MD -0.03 logMAR, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.03, 252 eyes, 2 studies). None of the included studies reported contrast sensitivity or quality of life. Growth of new vessels (largely change in CNV size) was variably reported in three studies (803 eyes). It was not possible to produce a summary estimate and there was no consistent pattern to the study results (very low-certainty evidence). For adverse outcomes, variable results were reported in the four studies. In three studies reports of adverse events were low and no radiation-associated adverse events were reported. In one study of epimacular brachytherapy there was a higher proportion of ocular adverse events (54%) compared to the anti-VEGF alone (18%). The majority of these adverse events were cataract. Overall 5% of the treatment group had radiation device-related adverse events (17 cases); 10 of these cases were radiation retinopathy. There were differences in average number of injections given between the four studies (1072 eyes). In three of the four studies, the anti-VEGF alone group on average received more injections (moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence is uncertain regarding the use of radiotherapy for neovascular AMD. Most studies took place before the routine use of anti-VEGF, and before the development of modern radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. Visual outcomes with epimacular brachytherapy are likely to be worse, with an increased risk of adverse events,  probably related to vitrectomy. The role of stereotactic radiotherapy combined with anti-VEGF is currently uncertain. Further research on radiotherapy for neovascular AMD may not be justified until current ongoing studies have reported their results.

Low-Energy Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Treatment of Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Treat-and-Extend Regimen

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-energy stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment following a treat-and-extend regimen (TER) in wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Before/after SRT, the authors compared retrospective consecutive case series of 50 patients requiring frequent anti-VEGF treatment (every 4 or 6 weeks) in wet AMD, treated with a single session of SRT and TER (same manner pre/post-SRT). Outcomes were visual acuity (VA), recurrence-free interval, and central retinal thickness (CRT).

RESULTS

After SRT, CRT was reduced from baseline (407.3 μm ± 153.2 μm) to 12 months (320.2 μm ± 112.1 μm; P < .001), with statistical significance from month 2 onward. VA was stable for 12 months (64.0 letters ± 15.1 letters vs. 63.6 letters ± 16.2 letters). The mean recurrence-free interval increased from 4.24 weeks ± 0.66 weeks to 7.52 weeks ± 3.05 weeks at 12 months (P < .001). No severe side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Low-energy SRT, combined with anti-VEGF TER, was associated with reduced injection frequency and preserved VA during 12 months of follow-up. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:86-93.].

Changes in Peripapillary Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness after Adjuvant Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in conjunction with intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs on peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational case series of patients with nAMD, who underwent SRT and subsequently had at least 12 months of complete follow-up. After SRT and one mandatory IVI, patients were examined monthly and received further treatment on a pro re nata basis. Examination included spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the optic disc to measure pRNFL thickness. Patients' data were retrieved from medical records including demographics, disease duration, best-corrected visual acuity, previous number of intravitreal injections, and the type of drug applied.

RESULTS

A total of 35 eyes of 35 patients (76.23 ± 7.05 years) were included. The mean duration of nAMD at time of irradiation was 34.57 ± 16.96 months. During that time, patients received a mean total number of 15.83 ± 6.29 intravitreal injections, 6.86 ± 1.57 within the last 12 months before SRT. After SRT, on average 3.46 ± 2.09 injections were administered over 12 months, resulting in a mean total number of 19.29 ± 6.92 injections at final follow-up. The mean global pRNFL thickness was 97.23 ± 12.55 µm at time of irradiation, 95.54 ± 11.07 µm at 6 month (P = 0.299), and 95.29 ± 12.07 µm at 12 month (P = 0.373) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

SRT in conjunction with anti-VEGF injections did not lead to any significant change in pRNFL thickness over 12 months in patients with nAMD. However, long-term results are not yet available. Therefore, prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to corroborate these findings.

Inhibiting the effect of (90)Sr-(90)Y ophthalmic applicators on rat corneal neovascularization induced by sutures

AIM

To investigate a practical technique used to inhibit corneal angiogenesis with a (90)Sr-(90)Y ophthalmic applicator.

METHODS

A (90)Sr-(90)Y ophthalmic applicator was detected with a radioactive nuclide application treatment healthy protection standard. The applicator used was produced through medical dosimetry research; it had a concave applicator add measured the applicator temperature, serviceable humidity range, applicator appearance status, applicator radiation homogeneity, radioautography, and radiological safety of the original applicator surface. A vessel model was established using newborn rats, with sutures around the corneal limbus. Corneal neovascularization (CNV) were observed with a slit lamp. The new vessel length and response area were measured.

RESULTS

Low-dose radiation can inhibit CNV after corneal sutures. The absorbed dose of the applicator (0.046 Gy/s) was safe for the treatment of it. The lengths of new vessels and the areas of new vessels were lower than the new born vessel rat group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The optimal radiation dose emitting from the applicator can be safe and potentially used in humans.

Cellular and Molecular Pathology of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Potential Role for Proteoglycans

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a retinal disease evident after the age of 50 that damages the macula in the centre of retina. It leads to a loss of central vision with retained peripheral vision but eventual blindness occurs in many cases. The initiation site of AMD development is Bruch's membrane (BM) where multiple changes occur including the deposition of plasma derived lipids, accumulation of extracellular debris, changes in cell morphology, and viability and the formation of drusen. AMD manifests as early and late stage; the latter involves cell proliferation and neovascularization in wet AMD. Current therapies target the later hyperproliferative and invasive wet stage whilst none target early developmental stages of AMD. In the lipid deposition disease atherosclerosis modified proteoglycans bind and retain apolipoproteins in the artery wall. Chemically modified trapped lipids are immunogenic and can initiate a chronic inflammatory process manifesting as atherosclerotic plaques and subsequent artery blockages, heart attacks, or strokes. As plasma derived lipoprotein deposits are found in BM in early AMD, it is possible that they arise by a similar process within the macula. In this review we consider aspects of the pathological processes underlying AMD with a focus on the potential role of modifications to secreted proteoglycans being a cause and therefore a target for the treatment of early AMD.

[Radiotherapy indications for non-malignant diseases in 2014]

This review updates the radiotherapy indications for non-malignant diseases, except those treated by radiosurgery. Since the last 2005 review, there have been no major changes in the indications: the prevention of heteropic bone formation and keloids remain classical indications, while the treatment of macular degeneration or the prevention of coronary restenosis are now past history. Nevertheless, the radiation treatment for benign diseases should have the same criteria as for malignant diseases: information of the patient on risks, benefits and treatment quality.

Epimacular brachytherapy for wet AMD: current perspectives

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is considered the most common cause of blindness in the over-60 age group in developed countries. There are basically two forms of presentation: geographic (dry or atrophic) and wet (neovascular or exudative). Geographic atrophy accounts for approximately 85%–90% of ophthalmic frames and leads to a progressive degeneration of the retinal pigment epithelium and the photoreceptors. Wet AMD causes the highest percentage of central vision loss secondary to disease. This neovascular form involves an angiogenic process in which newly formed choroidal vessels invade the macular area. Today, intravitreal anti-angiogenic drugs attempt to block the angiogenic events and represent a major advance in the treatment of wet AMD. Currently, combination therapy for wet AMD includes different forms of radiation delivery. Epimacular brachytherapy (EMBT) seems to be a useful approach to be associated with current anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents, presenting an acceptable efficacy and safety profile. However, at the present stage of research, the results of the clinical trials carried out to date are insufficient to justify extending routine use of EMBT for the treatment of wet AMD.

Particle radiosurgery: a new frontier of physics in medicine

Radiosurgery was introduced over half a century ago for treatment of intracranial lesions. In more recent years, stereotactic radiotherapy has rapidly advanced and is now commonly used for treatments of both cranial and extracranial lesions with high doses delivered in a few, down to a single fraction. The results of a workshop on Particle radiosurgery: A new frontier of physics in medicine held at Obergurgl, Austria during August 25-29 2013 are summarized in this issue with an overview presented in this paper. The focus was laid on particle radiosurgery but the content also includes current practice in x-ray radiosurgery and the overarching research in radiobiology and motion management for extracranial lesions. The results and discussions showed that especially research in radiobiology of high-dose charged-particles and motion management are necessary for the success of particle radiosurgery.

Influence of eye size and beam entry angle on dose to non-targeted tissues of the eye during stereotactic x-ray radiosurgery of AMD

Age-related macular degeneration is a leading cause of vision loss for the elderly population of industrialized nations. The IRay® Radiotherapy System, developed by Oraya® Therapeutics, Inc., is a stereotactic low-voltage irradiation system designed to treat the wet form of the disease. The IRay System uses three robotically positioned 100 kVp collimated photon beams to deliver an absorbed dose of up to 24 Gy to the macula. The present study uses the Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNPX to assess absorbed dose to six non-targeted tissues within the eye-total lens, radiosensitive tissues of the lens, optic nerve, distal tip of the central retinal artery, non-targeted portion of the retina, and the ciliary body--all as a function of eye size and beam entry angle. The ocular axial length was ranged from 20 to 28 mm in 2 mm increments, with the polar entry angle of the delivery system varied from 18° to 34° in 2° increments. The resulting data showed insignificant variations in dose for all eye sizes. Slight variations in the dose to the optic nerve and the distal tip of the central retinal artery were noted as the polar beam angle changed. An increase in non-targeted retinal dose was noted as the entry angle increased, while the dose to the lens, sensitive volume of the lens, and ciliary body decreased as the treatment polar angle increased. Polar angles of 26° or greater resulted in no portion of the sensitive volume of the lens receiving an absorbed dose of 0.5 Gy or greater. All doses to non-targeted structures reported in this study were less than accepted thresholds for post-procedure complications.

Charged particle therapy--optimization, challenges and future directions

The use of charged particle therapy to control tumours non-invasively offers advantages over conventional radiotherapy. Protons and heavy ions deposit energy far more selectively than X-rays, allowing a higher local control of the tumour, a lower probability of damage to healthy tissue, low risk of complications and the chance for a rapid recovery after therapy. Charged particles are also useful for treating tumours located in areas that surround tissues that are radiosensitive and in anatomical sites where surgical access is limited. Current trial outcomes indicate that accelerated ions can potentially replace surgery for radical cancer treatments, which might be beneficial as the success of surgical cancer treatments are largely dependent on the expertise and experience of the surgeon and the location of the tumour. However, to date, only a small number of controlled randomized clinical trials have made comparisons between particle therapy and X-rays. Therefore, although the potential advantages are clear and supported by data, the cost:benefit ratio remains controversial. Research in medical physics and radiobiology is focusing on reducing the costs and increasing the benefits of this treatment.