Practice Patterns Analysis of Ocular Proton Therapy Centers: The International OPTIC Survey

Enhancing radiotherapy techniques for Triple-Negative breast cancer treatment

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide, with various subtypes that require distinct treatment approaches. Among these, Triple-Negative Breast Bancer (TNBC) is recognized as the most aggressive form, often associated with poor prognosis due to its lack of targeted therapeutic options. This review specifically focuses on Radiotherapy (RT) as a treatment modality for TNBC, evaluating recent advancements and ongoing challenges, particularly the issue of radioresistance. RT remains an essential part in the management of breast cancer, including TNBC. Over the years, multiple improvements have been made to enhance RT effectiveness and minimize resistance. The introduction of advanced techniques such as Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) has significantly improved precision and reduced toxicity. More recently, proton radiation therapy, a novel RT modality, has been introduced, offering enhanced dose distribution and reducing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Despite these technological advancements, a subset of TNBC patients continues to exhibit resistance to RT, leading to recurrence and poor treatment outcomes. To overcome radioresistance, there is an increasing interest in combining RT with targeted therapeutic agents that sensitize cancer cells to radiation. Radiosensitizing drugs have been explored to enhance the efficacy of RT by making cancer cells more susceptible to radiation-induced damage. Potential candidates include DNA damage repair inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and small-molecule targeted therapies that interfere with key survival pathways in TNBC cells. In conclusion, while RT remains a crucial modality for TNBC treatment, radioresistance remains a significant challenge. Future research should focus on optimizing RT techniques while integrating radiosensitizing agents to improve treatment efficacy. By combining RT with targeted drug therapy, a more effective and personalized treatment approach can be developed, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing recurrence rates in TNBC.

OCT Angiography Analysis of Retinal and Choroidal Flow after Proton Beam Therapy for Choroidal Melanoma

Purpose

To evaluate the macular and peripapillary retinal and choroidal flow changes in eyes with choroidal melanoma (CM) treated with proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) using OCT angiography (OCTA).

Design

A prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study.

Participants

All patients seen at the study center between 2019 and 2024 who received PBRT for CM in 1 eye ≥1 year before enrollment with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) >20/200, unremarkable contralateral eye, and agreed to participate.

Methods

After a comprehensive eye examination, including BCVA, Optovue AngioVue was used to obtain the 4.5-mm optic disc and 6.0-mm macular OCT/OCT angiography (OCTA) images of both eyes. All vascular density (VD) measurements were obtained automatically using the OCTA software, except choriocapillaris VD, which was quantitated using ImageJ. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze differences in OCT/OCTA parameters between the treated and the contralateral eyes. Spearman's ρ was used to identify OCTA parameters associated with BCVA or radiation dose. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Main Outcome Measures

Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perimeter, choriocapillaris and retinal (superficial and deep) capillary VD in the macula and radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) VD on OCTA; macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness on OCT, tumor location, laterality and size at baseline, BCVA of both eyes, PBRT dose, and duration of follow-up at enrollment.

Results

Among 24 participants, OCT/OCTA parameters were significantly different in the treated eyes when compared with the contralateral eyes, including increased FAZ area and perimeter, decreased peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and RPC VD, and decreased macular choriocapillaris VD and parafoveal and perifoveal superficial retinal plexus VD (P < 0.05). Best-corrected visual acuity in the treated eyes correlated significantly with FAZ area and perimeter, parafoveal and perifoveal deep retinal plexus VD, and radiation dose to fovea but not radiation dose to the optic disc.

Conclusions

Although PBRT can affect both retinal and choroidal vascular flow in the macular and peripapillary region in eyes with CM, BCVA after PBRT seems to correlate best with the retinal vascular flow changes in the macula on OCTA and radiation dose to the fovea.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Gantry-based pencil beam scanning proton therapy for uveal melanoma: IMPT versus proton arc therapy

BACKGROUND

This study reports the single-institution clinical experience of multifield pencil beam scanning (PBS) intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and dosimetric comparison to proton arc for uveal melanoma (UM) in a regular PBS gantry room.

METHODS

Eleven consecutive UM patients were treated with IMPT to 50 Gy in 5 fractions. A customized gaze-fixation device attached to the thermoplastic mask was used to reproduce the globe position for each patient. IMPT plans were robustly optimized with perturbations of 3 mm setup and 3.5% range uncertainties using 3-4 fields without apertures. Each plan was robustly reoptimized (using the same perturbation parameters) using two non-coplanar arc fields in the RayStation treatment planning system. Treatment quality for both plans was evaluated daily using CBCT-generated synthetic CT. Target coverage, conformity, and mean/maximum doses to adjacent organs were assessed.

RESULTS

Proton arc plans provided comparable plan quality compared to IMPT plans. Similar target coverage was achieved, with an average GTV D95% equal to 101.1% [Formula: see text] 1.0% and 101.4% [Formula: see text] 0.4% for IMPT and proton arc plans, respectively. Proton arc improves the conformity index (RTOG) compared to IMPT plans (average 0.96 [Formula: see text] 0.23 vs. 0.88 [Formula: see text] 0.18, p = 0.11). Both modalities met all the clinical goals for organs-at-risk (OARs), while proton arc significantly reduced the maximum dose for the retina from, on average, 54.5 [Formula: see text] 0.7 to 53.2 [Formula: see text] 0.3 Gy (p < 0.01). Treatment evaluation on synthetic CT showed that the doses received by patients were highly consistent with the planned doses, with a relative target coverage (D95%) difference within 3.5% for IMPT and 3.1% for proton arc, and the D95% of actual delivery exceeding 98.7% and 98.2%, respectively. The doses delivered to OARs did not exceed clinical constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a novel report on proton arc for ocular tumors and gantry-based multifield PBS proton treatment for these tumors. This study demonstrated that both modalities can meet the clinical goals. The IMPT is currently clinically implanted, and 2-field non-coplanar proton arc plans can achieve comparable dosimetric metrics to those of IMPT plans when the deliver technique is matured.

Patient-specific mapping of fundus photographs to three-dimensional ocular imaging

BACKGROUND

Ocular proton beam therapy (OPT) planning would benefit from an accurate incorporation of fundus photographs, as various intra-ocular structures, such as the fovea, are not visible on conventional modalities such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). However, the use of fundus photographs in OPT is limited, as the eye's optics induce a nonuniform patient-specific deformation to the images.

PURPOSE

To develop a method to accurately map fundus photographs to three-dimensional images.

METHODS

Personalized optical raytracing simulations were performed for 27 subjects, using subject-specific eye models based on corneal topography, biometry, and MRI. Light rays were traced through the eye for angles of 0°-85° with respect to the optical axis, in steps of 5°. These simulations provided a reference mapping between camera angles and retinal locations and were used to develop a mapping method without raytracing. The accuracy of this and earlier proposed methods was evaluated. Finally, the most accurate method was implemented in RayOcular, an image-based OPT planning system, and the fundus photography-based tumor contour was compared with MRI.

RESULTS

When a patient-specific second nodal point is taken as a reference to describe the retinal location, the camera, and retinal angles show a strong linear relation with a small variation between subjects. At a camera angle of 60°, for example, a corresponding retinal angle of 59.9° ± 0.4° (mean ± SD) was found. When this linear relation is used to predict the corresponding retinal location (without raytracing) of a camera angle of 40°, the mean (Euclidian distance) error in the retinal location was 0.02 mm (SD = 0.06 mm), which was significantly (p < 0.001) lower than earlier proposed methods including EYEPLAN 4.16 mm (SD = 0.25 mm), the Lamberth projection -0.12 mm (SD = 0.46 mm) or polar projection 0.26 mm (SD = 0.57 mm). When implemented in the fundus view of RayOcular, the median distance between contours based on MRI and fundus photography was 0.2 mm (IQR = 0.1-0.3 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The second nodal point provides a patient-specific reference for an accurate mapping of fundus photographs to three-dimensional images with sub-millimeter errors.

Clinical workload profile of medical physics professionals at particle therapy Centers: a National Survey in Japan

The current research on staffing models is primarily focused on conventional external photon beam therapy, which predominantly involves using linear accelerators. This emphasizes the need for comprehensive studies to understand better and define specific particle therapy facilities' staffing requirements. In a 2022 survey of 25 particle therapy facilities in Japan with an 84% response rate, significant insights were obtained regarding workload distribution, defined as the product of personnel count and task time (person-minutes), for patient-related tasks and equipment quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC). The survey revealed that machinery QA/QC tasks were particularly demanding, with an average monthly workload of 376.9 min and weekly tasks averaging 162.1 min. In comparison, patient-related workloads focused on treatment planning, exhibiting substantial time commitments, particularly for scanning and passive scattering techniques. The average workloads for treatment planning per patient were 291.3 and 195.4 min, respectively. In addition, specific patient scenarios such as pre-treatment sedation in pediatric cases require longer durations (averaging 84.5 min), which likely include the workloads of not only the physician responsible for sedation but also the radiotherapy technology and medical physics specialists providing support during sedation and the nursing staff involved in sedation care. These findings underscore the significant time investments required for machinery QA/QC and patient-specific treatment planning in particle therapy facilities, along with the need for specialized care procedures in pediatric cases. The results of this survey also emphasized the challenges and staffing requirements to ensure QA/QC in high-precision medical environments.

Silicone Fiducial Markers Improve Precision in Uveal Melanoma Radiation Therapy

Objectives: Accurate target definition, treatment planning and delivery increases local tumor control for radiotherapy by minimizing collateral damage. To achieve this goal for uveal melanoma (UM), tantalum fiducial markers (TFMs) were previously introduced in proton and photon beam radiotherapy. However, TFMs cause pronounced scattering effects in imaging that make the delineation of small tumors difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate silicone fiducial markers (SFMs) for the guiding of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for UM. Methods: In this retrospective interventional pilot case series, three patients with small UMs 3 mm or less in tumor thickness and ≤10 mm in largest basal diameter received silicone fiducial markers. The fiducial markers were punched out (3 mm) from conventional silicone encircling bands for buckle surgery. The markers were sutured onto the sclera at the tumor margins according to the use of TFMs. MRI and CT images were used for the localization of the tumor and the markers before robotic-guided SRS. Results: The silicone fiducial markers were punched out easily from the original band, better to handle than TFMs and easy to suture onto the sclera. They could be visualized in both MRI and CT, but were more visible in CT. In the absence of scattering effects, both the markers and thus the tumor boundaries could be clearly delineated. Conclusions: This is the first report that introduces fiducial markers intraoperatively shaped from conventional silicone encircling bands usually used for retinal detachment surgery. The SFMs allow more accurate tumor delineation, resulting in the more precise planning and administration of SRS when compared to TFMs. This simple modification has a major impact on a well-known treatment approach.

PTCOG Ocular Statement: Expert Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in Ocular Proton Therapy

Although rare cancers, ocular tumors are a threat to vision, quality of life, and potentially life expectancy of a patient. Ocular proton therapy (OPT) is a powerful tool for successfully treating this disease. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Ocular Group) formulated an Evidence and Expert-Based Executive Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in OPT: comparative dosimetric and clinical analysis with the different OPT systems is essential to set up planning guidelines, implement best practices, and establish benchmarks for eye preservation, vision, and quality of life measures. Contemporary prospective trials in select subsets of patients (eg, tumors near the optic disc and/or macula) may allow for dosimetric and clinical analysis between different radiation modalities and beamline systems to evaluate differences in radiation delivery and penumbra, and resultant tumor control, normal tissue complication rates, and overall clinical cost-effectiveness. To date, the combination of multimodal imaging (fundus photography, ultrasound, etc), ophthalmologist assessment, and clip surgery with radiation planning have been keys to successful treatment. Increased use of three-dimensional imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) is anticipated although its spatial resolution might be a limiting factor (eg, detection of flat diffuse tumor parts). Commercially produced ocular treatment-planning systems are under development and their future use is expected to expand across OPT centers. Future continuity of OPT will depend on the following: (1) maintaining and upgrading existing older dedicated low-energy facilities, (2) maintaining shared, degraded beamlines at large proton therapy centers, and (3) developing adapted gantry beams of sufficient quality to maintain the clinical benefits of sharp beam conformity. Option (1) potentially offers the sharpest beams, minimizing impact on healthy tissues, whereas (2) and (3) potentially offer the advantage of substantial long-term technical support and development as well as the introduction of new approaches. Significant patient throughputs and close cooperation between medical physics, ophthalmology, and radiation therapy, underpinned by mutual understanding, is crucial for a successful OPT service.

The effect of intra- and inter-fractional motion on target coverage and margins in proton therapy for uveal melanoma

Introduction.This study aims to assess the effective lateral margin requirements for target coverage in ocular proton therapy (OPT), considering the unique challenges posed by eye motion and hypofractionation. It specifically addresses the previously unaccounted-for uncertainty contribution of intra-fractional motion, in conjunction with setup uncertainties, on dosimetric determination of lateral margin requirements.Method.The methodology integrates dose calculations from the in-house developed treatment planning system OCULARIS with measured intra-fractional motion, patient models from EyePlan and Monte Carlo (MC) sampling of setup uncertainties. The study is conducted on 16 uveal melanoma patients previously treated in the OPTIS2 treatment room at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI).Result.The retrospective simulation analysis highlights a significant impact of non-systematic factors on lateral margin requirements in OPT. Simulations indicate that reducing the 2.5 mm clinical lateral margin, represented by a 2.1 mm margin in this work, would have resulted in inadequate target coverage for two patients, revealing a greater impact of non-systematic factors on lateral margin requirements.Conclusions.This work characterizes intra-fractional motion in 16 OPT patients and identifies limitations of clinical margin selection protocols for OPT applications. A novel framework was introduced to assess margin sufficiency for target coverage. The findings suggest that prior research underestimated non-systematic factors and overestimated systematic contributions to lateral margin components. This re-evaluation highlights the critical need to prioritize the management of non-systematic uncertainty contributions in OPT.

Proton Therapy in Uveal Melanoma

Background/Objectives: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Treatment options for localized, early-stage disease include enucleation, brachytherapy, and proton beam therapy. This review aims to evaluate the role of proton therapy in the definitive management of uveal melanoma, focusing on its physics, radiobiology, treatment techniques, and associated outcomes. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes current literature on proton therapy for uveal melanoma, emphasizing case selection, treatment efficacy, and side effects. Results: Proton therapy offers significant advantages for thicker uveal melanomas (over 8 mm) due to its unique physical properties, including a rapid dose fall-off that protects critical structures like the retina and optic nerve. Proton therapy may have benefits in tumor control for ocular melanomas given its increased relative biological effectiveness relative to photon therapy for these typically more radioresistant melanomas. Proton therapy may also hold special value for uveal melanomas in close proximity to the optic nerve, as patients are at high risk of visual toxicities with brachytherapy. The review discusses the efficacy of proton therapy across small, medium, and large tumors, along with strategies for improving patient survival through combined systemic therapy. Additionally, the potential of ocular reirradiation with proton therapy is addressed. Conclusions: Proton therapy is an effective treatment for uveal melanoma. It offers advantages over brachytherapy for large tumors, tumors that are close to the optic nerve or insertion of extra-ocular muscles.

Geometrical accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for ocular proton therapy planning

Background & purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in treatment preparation of ocular proton therapy, but its spatial accuracy might be limited by geometric distortions due to susceptibility artefacts. A correct geometry of the MR images is paramount since it defines where the dose will be delivered. In this study, we assessed the geometrical accuracy of ocular MRI.

Materials & methods

A dedicated ocular 3 T MRI protocol, with localized shimming and increased gradients, was compared to computed tomography (CT) and X-ray images in a phantom and in 15 uveal melanoma patients. The MRI protocol contained three-dimensional T2-weighted and T1-weighted sequences with an isotropic reconstruction resolution of 0.3-0.4 mm. Tantalum clips were identified by three observers and clip-clip distances were compared between T2-weighted and T1-weighted MRI, CT and X-ray images for the phantom and between MRI and X-ray images for the patients.

Results

Interobserver variability was below 0.35 mm for the phantom and 0.30(T1)/0.61(T2) mm in patients. Mean absolute differences between MRI and reference were below 0.27 ± 0.16 mm and 0.32 ± 0.23 mm for the phantom and in patients, respectively. In patients, clip-clip distances were slightly larger on MRI than on X-ray images (mean difference T1: 0.11 ± 0.38 mm, T2: 0.10 ± 0.44 mm). Differences did not increase at larger distances and did not correlate to interobserver variability.

Conclusions

A dedicated ocular MRI protocol can produce images of the eye with a geometrical accuracy below half the MRI acquisition voxel (<0.4 mm). Therefore, these images can be used for ocular proton therapy planning, both in the current model-based workflow and in proposed three-dimensional MR-based workflows.

Measurements regarding a combined therapy concept for ophthalmic tumors consisting of brachytherapy and x-rays

Objective.We present a novel concept to treat ophthalmic tumors which combines brachytherapy and low-energy x-ray therapy. Brachytherapy with106Ru applicators is inadequate for intraocular tumors with a height of 7 mm or more. This results from a steep dose gradient, and it is unfeasible to deliver the required dose at the tumor apex without exceeding the maximum tolerable sclera dose of usually 1000 Gy to 1500 Gy. Other modalities, such as irradiation with charged particles, may be individually contraindicated. A dose boost at the apex provided by a superficial x-ray therapy unit, performed simultaneously with the brachytherapy, results in a more homogeneous dose profile than brachytherapy alone. This avoids damage to organs at risk. The applicator may also serve as a beam stop for x-rays passing through the target volume, which reduces healthy tissue dosage. This study aims to investigate the suitability of the applicator to serve as a beam stop for the x-rays.Approach.A phantom with three detector types comprising a soft x-ray ionization chamber, radiochromic films, and a self-made scintillation detector was constructed to perform dosimetry. Measurements were performed using a conventional x-ray unit for superficial therapy to investigate the uncertainties of the phantom and the ability of the applicator to absorb x-rays. The manufacturer provided a dummy plaque to obtain x-ray dose profiles without noise from106Ru decays.Results.The phantom is generally feasible to obtain dose profiles with three different detector types. The interaction of x-rays with the silver of the applicator leads to an increased dose rate in front of the applicator. The dose rate of the x-rays is reduced by up to 90% behind a106Ru applicator. Therefore, a106Ru applicator can be used as a beam stop in combined x-ray and brachytherapy treatment.

Uncertainties in ocular proton planning and their impact on required margins

PURPOSE

To review required margins in ocular proton therapy (OPT) based on an uncertainty estimation and to compare them with widely used values. Further, uncertainties when using registered funduscopy images in the 3D model is investigated.

METHODS

An uncertainty budget in planning and delivery was defined to determine required aperture and range margins. Setup uncertainties were considered for a cohort of treated patients and tested in a worst-case estimation. Other uncertainties were based on a best-guess and knowledge of institutional specifics, e.g. range reproducibility. Margins for funduscopy registration were defined resulting from scaling, rotation and translation of the image. Image formation for a wide-field fundus camera was reviewed and compared to the projection employed in treatment planning systems.

RESULTS

Values for aperture and range with margins of 2.5 mm as reported in literature could be determined. Aperture margins appear appropriate for setup uncertainties below 0.5 mm, but depend on lateral penumbra. Range margins depend on depth and associated density uncertainty in tissue. Registration of funduscopy images may require margins of >2 mm, increasing towards the equator. Difference in the projection may lead to discrepancies of several mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The commonly used 2.5 mm aperture margin was validated as an appropriate choice, while range margins could be reduced for lower ranges. Margins may however not include uncertainties in contouring and possible microscopic spread. If a target base is contoured on registered funduscopy images care must be taken as they are subject to larger uncertainties. Multimodal imaging approach in OPT remains advisable.

Equivalent uniform RBE-weighted dose in eye plaque brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

Brachytherapy for ocular melanoma is based on the application of eye plaques with different spatial dose nonuniformity, time-dependent dose rates and relative biological effectiveness (RBE).

PURPOSE

We propose a parameter called the equivalent uniform RBE-weighted dose (EUDRBE) that can be used for quantitative characterization of integrated cell survival in radiotherapy modalities with the variable RBE, dose nonuniformity and dose rate. The EUDRBE is applied to brachytherapy with 125I eye plaques designed by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS).

METHODS

The EUDRBE is defined as the uniform dose distribution with RBE = 1 that causes equal cell survival for a given nonuniform dose distribution with the variable RBE > 1. The EUDRBE can be used for comparison of cell survival for nonuniform dose distributions with different RBE, because they are compared to the reference dose with RBE = 1. The EUDRBE is applied to brachytherapy with 125I COMS eye plaques that are characterized by a steep dose gradient in tumor base-apex direction, protracted irradiation during time intervals of 3-8 days, and variable dose-rate dependent RBE with a maximum of about 1.4. The simulations are based on dose of 85 Gy prescribed to the farthest intraocular extent of the tumor (tumor apex). To compute the EUDRBE in eye plaque brachytherapy and correct for protracted irradiation, the distributions of physical dose have been converted to non-uniform distributions of biologically effective dose (BED) to include the biological effects of sublethal cellular repair, Our radiobiological analysis considers the combined effects of different time-dependent dose rates, spatial dose non-uniformity, dose fractionation and different RBE and can be used to derive optimized dose regimens brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Our simulations show that the EUDRBE increases with the prescription depths and the maximum increase may achieve 6% for the tumor height of 12 mm. This effect stems from a steep dose gradient within the tumor that increases with the prescription depth. The simulations also show that the EUDRBE increase may achieve 12% with increasing the dose rate when implant duration decreases. The combined effect of dose nonuniformity and dose rate may change the EUDRBE up to 18% for the same dose prescription of 85 Gy to tumor apex. The absolute dose range of 48-61 Gy (RBE) for the EUDRBE computed using 4 or 5 fractions is comparable to the dose prescriptions used in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with megavoltage X-rays (RBE = 1) for different cancers. The tumor control probabilities in SBRT and eye plaque brachytherapy are very similar at the level of 80% or higher that support the hypothesis that the selected approximations for the EUDRBE are valid.

CONCLUSIONS

The computed range of the EUDRBE in 125I COMS eye plaque brachytherapy suggests that the selected models and hypotheses are acceptable. The EUDRBE can be useful for analysis of treatment outcomes and comparison of different dose regimens in eye plaque brachytherapy.

A generalized model for monitor units determination in ocular proton therapy using machine learning: A proof-of-concept study

Objective.Determining and verifying the number of monitor units is crucial to achieving the desired dose distribution in radiotherapy and maintaining treatment efficacy. However, current commercial treatment planning system(s) dedicated to ocular passive eyelines in proton therapy do not provide the number of monitor units for patient-specific plan delivery. Performing specific pre-treatment field measurements, which is time and resource consuming, is usually gold-standard practice. This proof-of-concept study reports on the development of a multi-institutional-based generalized model for monitor units determination in proton therapy for eye melanoma treatments.Approach.To cope with the small number of patients being treated in proton centers, three European institutes participated in this study. Measurements data were collected to address output factor differences across the institutes, especially as function of field size, spread-out Bragg peak modulation width, residual range, and air gap. A generic model for monitor units prediction using a large number of 3748 patients and broad diversity in tumor patterns, was evaluated using six popular machine learning algorithms: (i) decision tree; (ii) random forest, (iii) extra trees, (iv) K-nearest neighbors, (v) gradient boosting, and (vi) the support vector regression. Features used as inputs into each machine learning pipeline were: Spread-out Bragg peak width, range, air gap, fraction and calibration doses. Performance measure was scored using the mean absolute error, which was the difference between predicted and real monitor units, as collected from institutional gold-standard methods.Main results.Predictions across algorithms were accurate within 3% uncertainty for up to 85.2% of the plans and within 10% uncertainty for up to 98.6% of the plans with the extra trees algorithm.Significance.A proof-of-concept of using machine learning-based generic monitor units determination in ocular proton therapy has been demonstrated. This could trigger the development of an independent monitor units calculation tool for clinical use.

Modernization of safety environment for a dedicated beamline for proton ocular therapy

BACKGROUND

Proton therapy is an effective treatment for ocular melanoma, and other tumors of the eye. The fixed horizontal beamline dedicated to ocular treatments at Massachusetts General Hospital was originally commissioned in 2002, with much of the equipment, safety features, and practices dating back to an earlier implementation at Harvard Cyclotron in the 1970s.

PURPOSE

To describe the experience of reevaluation and enhancement of the safety environment for one of the longest continuously operating proton therapy programs.

METHODS

Several enhancements in quality control had been introduced throughout the years of operation, as described in this manuscript, to better align the practice with the evolving standards of proton therapy and the demands of a modern hospital. We spotlight the design and results of the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), and subsequent actions introduced to mitigate the modes associated with elevated risk. The findings of the FMEA informed the specifications for the new software application, which facilitated the improved management of the treatment workflow and the image-guidance aspects of ocular treatments.

RESULTS

Eleven failure modes identified as having the highest risk are described. Six of these were mitigated with the clinical roll-out of a new application for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Others were addressed through task automation, the broader introduction of checklists, and enhancements in pre-treatment staff-led time-out.

CONCLUSIONS

Throughout the task of modernizing the safety system of our dedicated ocular beamline, FMEA proved to be an effective instrument in soliciting inputs from the staff about safety and workflow concerns, helping to identify steps associated with elevated failure risks. Risks were reduced with the clinical introduction of a new IGRT application, which integrates quality management tools widely recognized for their role in risk mitigation: automation of the data transfer and workflow steps, and with the introduction of checklists and redundancy cross-checks.

Single-Masked Randomized Phase 2 Study Assessing 2 Forms of Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Patients With Large Choroidal Melanomas

PURPOSE

Patients with large uveal melanomas are at major risk of liver metastases. Some patients are reluctant to undergo the standard treatment (ie, immediate enucleation). Proton therapy yields 5-year local control rates and eyeball retention of >85% and ≈20% in large uveal melanomas. Patients with T3/T4 uveal melanomas refusing enucleation were randomized between standard 4 to 13 Gy-fraction or moderately hypofractionated 8 to 6.5 Gy-fraction proton therapy. The main endpoint was the 2-year local recurrence-free survival without enucleation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A single-masked 1:2 randomized phase 2 trial was conducted between 2015 and 2017 with planned endoresection and distance to the posterior pole as strata. Local events were defined as local relapse, or enucleation due to complications or relapse.

RESULTS

The 32 patients, with a mean age of 64 years, had T3/4 (N = 17/15), M1 (N = 2) uveal melanomas, of mean tumor diameter and thickness of 16.5 mm and 9.1 mm, and of posterior location in 56.5%. Median follow-up was 56.7 months. The 2-year local recurrence-free survival rate without enucleation was 79% (95% confidence interval, 65%-96%), similar in both arms. There were 9 enucleations, 3 at relapse and 6 for toxicities. Twelve patients had distant metastases. The 2-year-overall survival was 72% (95% confidence interval, 58%-89%). At baseline, visual acuity by average logarithm value of the minimum angle of resolution was 0.68 and 0.70 in the standard and experimental arms, and at last follow-up 2 and 1.7, with mean differences of 1.44 and 1.01, respectively (P = .39).

CONCLUSION

An 8-times 6.5 Gy scheme is feasible without deteriorating local control and with similar toxicity rates in patients with large uveal melanomas. Larger studies incorporating adjuvant treatments are warranted.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Clinical Care for Uveal Melanoma Patients-A Systematic Review from an Ophthalmic Perspective

Conversely to most tumour types, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was rarely used for eye tumours. As recent technical advances have increased ocular MRI's diagnostic value, various clinical applications have been proposed. This systematic review provides an overview of the current status of MRI in the clinical care of uveal melanoma (UM) patients, the most common eye tumour in adults. In total, 158 articles were included. Two- and three-dimensional anatomical scans and functional scans, which assess the tumour micro-biology, can be obtained in routine clinical setting. The radiological characteristics of the most common intra-ocular masses have been described extensively, enabling MRI to contribute to diagnoses. Additionally, MRI's ability to non-invasively probe the tissue's biological properties enables early detection of therapy response and potentially differentiates between high- and low-risk UM. MRI-based tumour dimensions are generally in agreement with conventional ultrasound (median absolute difference 0.5 mm), but MRI is considered more accurate in a subgroup of anteriorly located tumours. Although multiple studies propose that MRI's 3D tumour visualisation can improve therapy planning, an evaluation of its clinical benefit is lacking. In conclusion, MRI is a complementary imaging modality for UM of which the clinical benefit has been shown by multiple studies.

Design and characterization of an aperture system and spot configuration for ocular treatments with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Proton therapy is a key modality used in the treatment of ocular melanoma. Traditionally ocular sites are treated using a dedicated eyeline with a passively scattered proton beam and a brass aperture. This work aims to design and characterize a beam-collimating aperture to treat ocular targets with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam.

METHODS

A plastic aperture system that slides into the gantry nozzle of a spot scanning proton beam was designed and constructed. It consists of an intermediate scraper layer to attenuate stray protons and a 3D-printed patient-specific aperture positioned 5.7 cm from the surface of the eye. The aperture system was modeled in TOPAS and Monte Carlo simulations were validated with film measurements. Two different spot configurations were investigated for treatment planning and characterized based on lateral penumbra, central axis (CAX) dose and relative efficiency. Alignment and leakage were investigated through experimental film measurements. Range was verified using a multi-layer ionization chamber. Reference dose measurements were made with a PinPoint 3D ion chamber. Neutron dose was evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations.

RESULTS

Aperture alignment with radiation isocenter was determined to be within 0.31 mm at a gantry angle of 0°. A single-spot configuration with a 10 mm diameter aperture yielded film-measured lateral penumbras of 1 mm to 1.25 mm, depending on depth in the spread-out Bragg peak. TOPAS simulations found that a single spot configuration results in a flat dose distribution for a 10 mm diameter aperture and provides a CAX dose of less than 106% for apertures less than 14 mm in diameter. For larger targets, adding four corner spots to fill in the dose distribution is beneficial. Trade-offs between lateral penumbra, CAX dose and relative efficiency were characterized for different spot configurations and can be used for future clinical decision-making. The aperture was experimentally determined to not affect proton beam range, and no concerning leakage radiation or neutron dose was identified. Reference dose measurements with a PinPoint ion chamber were within 2.1% of Monte Carlo calculated doses.

CONCLUSION

The aperture system developed in this work provides a method of treating ocular sites on a gantry-based spot scanning proton system. Additional work to develop compatible gaze tracking and gating infrastructure is ongoing.

Proton beam radiotherapy for choroidal and ciliary body melanoma in the UK-national audit of referral patterns of 1084 cases

INTRODUCTION

Proton beam therapy has been utilised for the treatment of uveal melanoma in the UK for over 30 years, undertaken under a single centre. In the UK, all ocular tumours are treated at one of four centres. We aimed to understand the variation in referral patterns to the UK proton service, capturing all uveal melanoma patients treated with this modality.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data regarding all patients treated at the Clatterbridge Proton service between January 2004 and December 2014.

RESULTS

A total of 1084 patients with uveal melanoma were treated. The mean age was 57 years (range 9-90 years), basal diameter of 11.5 mm (range 2.0-23.4 mm) and tumour thickness of 3.9 mm (range 0.1-15.4 mm). The majority were TNM stage I (39%) or II (36%). The distance to the optic nerve varied from 0 to 24.5 mm with 148 (14%) of patients having ciliary body involvement. There were variations in the phenotypic characteristic of the tumours treated with protons from different centres, with London referring predominantly small tumours at the posterior pole, Glasgow referring large tumours often at the ciliary body and Liverpool sending a mix of these groups.

DISCUSSION

In the UK, common indications for the use of proton treatment in uveal melanoma include small tumours in the posterior pole poorly accessible for plaque treatment (adjacent to the disc), tumours at the posterior pole affecting the fovea and large anterior tumours traditionally too large for brachytherapy. This is the first UK-wide audit enabling the capture of all patients treated at the single proton centre.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based and Conventional Measurements for Proton Beam Therapy of Uveal Melanoma

OBJECTIVE

Conventionally, ocular proton therapy (PT) is planned using measurements obtained by an ophthalmologist using ultrasound, fundoscopy, biometry, and intraoperative assessments. Owing to the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of uveal melanoma (UM), it is possible to acquire high-resolution 3-dimensional images of the eye, providing the opportunity to incorporate MRI in ocular PT planning. In this study, we described how these measurements can be obtained using MRI, compared the MRI-based measurements with conventional ophthalmic measurements, and identified potential pitfalls for both modalities.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS

Data from 23 consecutive patients with UM treated with PT were retrospectively evaluated.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging-based measurements of axial length, tumor height and basal diameter, and marker-tumor distances were compared with the conventional ophthalmic measurements, and discrepancies were evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Tumor prominence and basal diameters on MRI and ultrasound, axial length on MRI and biometry, tumor-marker distances on MRI and measured intraoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean absolute differences of the tumor height and basal diameter measurements between ultrasound and MRI were 0.57 mm and 1.44 mm, respectively. Larger absolute differences in height and basal diameter were observed when the full tumor extent was not visible on ultrasound (0.92 mm and 1.67 mm, respectively) compared with when the full tumor extent was visible (0.44 mm and 1.15 mm, respectively). When the full tumor was not visible on ultrasound, MRI was considered more reliable. Tumor-marker distances measured using MRI and intraoperative techniques differed < 1 mm in 55% of the markers. For anteriorly located and mushroom-shaped tumors (25% of the markers), MRI provided more accurate measurements. In flat UM (15% of the markers), however, it was difficult to delineate the tumor on MRI. The mean absolute difference in axial length between optical biometry and MRI was 0.50 mm. The presence of the tumor was found to influence optical biometry in 15 of 22 patients; the remaining patients showed a better agreement (0.30 mm). Magnetic resonance imaging-based biometry was considered more reliable in patients with UM.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging allowed for the 3-dimensional assessment of the tumor and surrounding tissue. In specific patients, it provided a more reliable measurement of axial length, tumor dimensions, and marker-tumor distances and could contribute to a more accurate treatment planning. Nevertheless, a combined evaluation remains advised, especially for flat UM.

A Systematic Comparison of Dose Distributions Delivered in 125I Plaque Brachytherapy and Proton Radiation Therapy for Ocular Melanoma

PURPOSE

To characterize dose distributions with ¹²⁵I plaque brachytherapy compared with proton radiation therapy for ocular melanoma for relevant clinical scenarios, based on tumor base diameter (d), apical height (h), and location.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plaque and proton treatment plans were created for 4 groups of cases: (1) REF: 39 instances of reference midsize circular-base tumor (d = 12 mm, h = 5 mm), in locations varying by retinal clock hours and distance to fovea, optic disc, and corneal limbus; (2) SUP: 25 superiorly located; (3) TEMP: 25 temporal; and (4) NAS: 25 nasally located tumors that were a fixed distance from the fovea but varying in d (6-18 mm) and h (3-11 mm). For both modalities, 111 unique scenarios were characterized in terms of the distance to points of interest, doses delivered to fovea, optic disc, optic nerve at 3 mm posterior to the disc (ON@3mm), lens, and retina. Comparative statistical evaluation was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Superior dose distributions favored plaque for sparing of (1) fovea in large (d + h ≥ 21 mm) NAS tumors; (2) ON@3mm in REF cases located ≤4 disc diameters from disc, and in NAS overall. Protons achieved superior dose sparing of (1) fovea and optic disc in REF, SUP, and TEMP; (2) ON@3mm in REF >4 disc diameters from disc, and in SUP and TEMP; and (3) the lens center overall and lens periphery in REF ≤6 mm from the corneal limbus, and in TEMP with h = 3 mm. Although protons could completely spare sections of the retina, plaque dose was more target conformal in the high-dose range (50% and 90% of prescription dose).

CONCLUSIONS

Although comparison between plaque and proton therapy is not straightforward because of the disparity in dose rate, prescriptions, applicators, and delivery techniques, it is possible to identify distinctions between dose distributions, which could help inform decisions by providers and patients.

Commissioning and validation of a novel commercial TPS for ocular proton therapy

BACKGROUND

Until today, the majority of ocular proton treatments worldwide were planned with the EYEPLAN treatment planning system (TPS). Recently, the commercial, computed tomography (CT)-based TPS for ocular proton therapy RayOcular was released, which follows the general concepts of model-based treatment planning approach in conjunction with a pencil-beam-type dose algorithm (PBA).

PURPOSE

To validate RayOcular with respect to two main features: accurate geometrical representation of the eye model and accuracy of its dose calculation algorithm in combination with an Ion Beam Applications (IBA) eye treatment delivery system.

METHODS

Different 3D-printed eye-ball-phantoms were fabricated to test the geometrical representation of the corresponding CT-based model, both in orthogonal 2D images for X-ray image overlay and in fundus view overlaid with a funduscopy. For the latter, the phantom was equipped with a lens matching refraction of the human eye. Funduscopy was acquired in a Zeiss Claus 500 camera. Tantalum clips and fiducials attached to the phantoms were localized in the TPS model, and residual deviations to the actual position in X-ray images for various orientations of the phantom were determined, after the nominal eye orientation was corrected in RayOcular to obtain a best overall fit. In the fundus view, deviations between known and displayed distances were measured. Dose calculation accuracy of the PBA on a 0.2 mm grid was investigated by comparing between measured lateral and depth-dose profiles in water for various combinations of range, modulation, and field-size. Ultimately, the modeling of dose distributions behind wedges was tested. A 1D gamma-test was applied, and the lateral and distal penumbra were further compared.

RESULTS

Average residuals between model clips and visible clips/fiducials in orthogonal X-ray images were within 0.3 mm, including different orientations of the phantom. The differences between measured distances on the registered funduscopy image in the RayOcular fundus view and the known ground-truth were within 1 mm up to 10.5 mm distance from the posterior pole. No clear benefit projection of either polar mode or camera mode could be identified, the latter mimicking camera properties. Measured dose distributions were reproduced with gamma-test pass-rates of >95% with 2%/0.3 mm for depth and lateral profiles in the middle of spread-out Bragg-peaks. Distal falloff and lateral penumbra were within 0.2 mm for fields without a wedge. For shallow depths, the agreement was worse, reaching pass-rates down to 80% with 5%/0.3 mm when comparing lateral profiles in air. This is caused by low-energy protons from a scatter source in the IBA system not modeled by RayOcular. Dose distributions modified by wedges were reproduced, matching the wedge-induced broadening of the lateral penumbra to within 0.4 mm for the investigated cases and showing the excess dose within the field due to wedge scatter.

CONCLUSION

RayOcular was validated for its use with an IBA single scattering delivery nozzle. Geometric modeling of the eye and representation of 2D projections fulfill clinical requirements. The PBA dose calculation reproduces measured distributions and allows explicit handling of wedges, overcoming approximations of simpler dose calculation algorithms used in other systems.

Inter-Observer Variability in MR-Based Target Volume Delineation of Uveal Melanoma

Purpose

Several efforts are being undertaken toward MRI-based treatment planning for ocular proton therapy for uveal melanoma (UM). The interobserver variability of the gross target volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the important parameters to design safety margins for a reliable treatment. Therefore, this study assessed the interobserver variation in GTV delineation of UM on MRI.

Methods and Materials

Six observers delineated the GTV in 10 different patients using the Big Brother contouring software. Patients were scanned at 3T MRI with a surface coil, and tumors were delineated separately on contrast enhanced 3DT1 (T1gd) and 3DT2-weighted scans with an isotropic acquisition resolution of 0.8 mm. Volume difference and overall local variation (median standard deviation of the distance between the delineated contours and the median contour) were analyzed for each GTV. Additionally, the local variation was analyzed for 4 interfaces: sclera, vitreous, retinal detachment, and tumor-choroid interface.

Results

The average GTV was significantly larger on T1gd (0.57cm³) compared with T2 (0.51cm³, P = .01). A not significant higher interobserver variation was found on T1gd (0.41 mm) compared with T2 (0.35 mm). The largest variations were found at the tumor-choroid interface due to peritumoral enhancement (T1gd, 0.62 mm; T2, 0.52 mm). As a result, a larger part of this tumor-choroid interface appeared to be included on T1gd-based GTVs compared with T2, explaining the smaller volumes on T2.

Conclusions

The interobserver variation of 0.4 mm on MRI are low with respect to the voxel size of 0.8 mm, enabling small treatment margins. We recommend delineation based on the T1gd-weighted scans, as choroidal tumor extensions might be missed.

A Comparison of Treatment Outcomes after Standard Dose (70 Gy) versus Reduced Dose (50 Gy) Proton Radiation in Patients with Uveal Melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes in a large patient cohort with small-medium tumors located within 1 disc diameter (DD) of the optic nerve and/or fovea treated with 50 Gy or 70 Gy proton therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

A total of 1120 patients with uveal melanomas ≤ 15 mm in largest basal diameter, ≤ 5 mm in height, located within 1 DD of the optic nerve and/or fovea, who received primary treatment with protons between 1975 and 2016 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear/Massachusetts General Hospital.

METHODS

The rates of outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between the radiation dose groups were tested using the log-rank test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Local tumor recurrence, melanoma-related mortality, and visual acuity preservation (≥ 20/200, ≥ 20/40).

RESULTS

Local tumor recurrence was observed in 1.8% of the 50 Gy group and 1.5% of the 70 Gy group. The median time to recurrence was 30.7 months for patients treated with 50 Gy and 32.0 months for those treated with 70 Gy (P = 0.28). Five-year rates of vision retention (≥20/40, ≥ 20/200) were 19.4% and 49.3% for patients treated with 50 Gy and 16.4% and 40.7% in those treated with 70 Gy. Ten-year rates of melanoma-related mortality were 8.4% in the 50 Gy group and 8.9% in the 70 Gy group (P = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable rates of local control are achieved treating small-medium tumors near the optic nerve and/or fovea with 50 Gy or 70 Gy proton therapy, supporting the use of the lower dose in patients with these tumor characteristics.

Automatic Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance-based measurements of tumour prominence and basal diameter for treatment planning of uveal melanoma

Background and Purpose

Three-dimensional (3D) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to complement conventional two-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of tumour dimension measurement of uveal melanoma. However, the lack of definitions of the 3D measurements of these tumour dimensions hinders further adaptation of MRI in ocular radiotherapy planning. In this study, we composed 3D MR-based definitions of tumour prominence and basal diameter and compared them to conventional ultrasound.

Materials and methods

Tumours were delineated on 3DT2 and contrast-enhanced 3DT1 (T1gd) MRI for 25 patients. 3D definitions of tumour prominence and diameter were composed and evaluated automatically on the T1gd and T2 contours. Automatic T1gd measurements were compared to manual MRI measurements, to automatic T2 measurements and to manual ultrasound measurements.

Results

Prominence measurements were similar for all modalities (median absolute difference 0.3 mm). Automatic T1gd diameter measurements were generally larger than manual MRI, automatic T2 and manual ultrasound measurements (median absolute differences of 0.5, 1.6 and 1.1 mm respectively), mainly due to difficulty defining the axis of the largest diameter. Largest differences between ultrasound and MRI for both prominence and diameter were found in anteriorly located tumours (up to 1.6 and 4.5 mm respectively), for which the tumour extent could not entirely be visualized with ultrasound.

Conclusions

The proposed 3D definitions for tumour prominence and diameter agreed well with ultrasound measurements for tumours for which the extent was visible on ultrasound. 3D MRI measurements generally provided larger diameter measurements than ultrasound. In anteriorly located tumours, the MRI measurements were considered more accurate than conventional ultrasound.

MRI and FUNDUS image fusion for improved ocular biometry in Ocular Proton Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Ocular biometry in Ocular Proton Therapy (OPT) currently relies on a generic geometrical eye model built by referencing surgically implanted markers. An alternative approach based on image fusion of volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and panoramic fundus photography was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen non-consecutive uveal melanoma (UM) patients, who consented for an MRI and had their tumour base visible on panoramic fundus photography, were included in this comparative analysis. Through generating digitally-reconstructed projections from MRI images using the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection, 2D-3D image fusion between fundus photography and an eye model delineated on MRI scans was achieved and allowed for a novel definition of the target base (MRI + F_CTV). MRI + F_CTV was compared with MRI-only delineation (MRI_GTV) and the conventional (EyePlan) target definition (EP_CTV).

RESULTS

The combined use of fundus photography and MRI to define tumour volumes reduced the average discrepancies by almost 65% with respect to the MRI only tumour definitions when comparing with the conventionally planned EP_CTV. With the proposed method, shallow sub-retinal tumour infiltration, otherwise invisible on MRI, can be included in the target volume definition. Moreover, a novel definition of the fovea location improves the accuracy and personalisation of the 3D eye model.

CONCLUSION

MRI and fundus image fusion overcomes some of the limitations of ophthalmological MRI for tumour volume definition in OPT. This novel eye tumour modelling method might improve treatment planning personalisation, allowing to better anticipate which patients could benefit from prophylactic treatment protocols for radiation induced maculopathy.

Considerations for Upright Particle Therapy Patient Positioning and Associated Image Guidance

Particle therapy is a rapidly growing field in cancer therapy. Worldwide, over 100 centers are in operation, and more are currently in construction phase. The interest in particle therapy is founded in the superior target dose conformity and healthy tissue sparing achievable through the particles’ inverse depth dose profile. This physical advantage is, however, opposed by increased complexity and cost of particle therapy facilities. Particle therapy, especially with heavier ions, requires large and costly equipment to accelerate the particles to the desired treatment energy and steer the beam to the patient. A significant portion of the cost for a treatment facility is attributed to the gantry, used to enable different beam angles around the patient for optimal healthy tissue sparing. Instead of a gantry, a rotating chair positioning system paired with a fixed horizontal beam line presents a suitable cost-efficient alternative. Chair systems have been used already at the advent of particle therapy, but were soon dismissed due to increased setup uncertainty associated with the upright position stemming from the lack of dedicated image guidance systems. Recently, treatment chairs gained renewed interest due to the improvement in beam delivery, commercial availability of vertical patient CT imaging and improved image guidance systems to mitigate the problem of anatomical motion in seated treatments. In this review, economical and clinical reasons for an upright patient positioning system are discussed. Existing designs targeted for particle therapy are reviewed, and conclusions are drawn on the design and construction of chair systems and associated image guidance. Finally, the different aspects from literature are channeled into recommendations for potential upright treatment layouts, both for retrofitting and new facilities.

30 years of ocular proton therapy, the Nice view

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy with protons (PT) is a standard treatment of ocular tumors. It achieves excellent tumor control, limited toxicities, and the preservation of important functional outcomes, such as vision. Although PT may appear as one homogenous technique, it can be performed using dedicated ocular passive scattering PT or, increasingly, Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS), both with various degrees of patient-oriented customization.

MATERAIAL AND METHODS

MEDICYC PT facility of Nice are detailed with respect to their technical, dosimetric, microdosimetric and radiobiological, patient and tumor-customization process of PT planning and delivery that are key. 6684 patients have been treated for ocular tumors (1991-2020). Machine characteristics (accelerator, beam line, beam monitoring) allow efficient proton extraction, high dose rate, sharp lateral and distal penumbrae, and limited stray radiation in comparison to beam energy reduction and subsequent straggling with high-energy PBS PT. Patient preparation before PT includes customized setup and image-guidance, CT-based planning, and ocular PT software modelling of the patient eye with integration of beam modifiers. Clinical reports have shown excellent tumor control rates (∼95%), vision preservation and limited toxicity rates (papillopathy, retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, dry eye, madarosis, cataract).

RESULTS

Although demanding, dedicated ocular PT has proven its efficiency in achieving excellent tumor control, OAR sparing and patient radioprotection. It is therefore worth adaptations of the equipments and practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Some of these adaptations can be transferred to other PT centers and should be acknowledeged when using non-PT options.

Ocular proton therapy, pencil beam scanning high energy proton therapy or stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma; an in silico study

PURPOSE

In radiotherapy, the dose and volumes of the irradiated normal tissues is correlated to the complication rate. We assessed the performances of low-energy proton therapy (ocular PT) with eye-dedicated equipment, high energy PT with pencil-beam scanning (PBS) or CyberKnife^R  -based stereotactic irradiation (SBRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

CT-based comparative dose distribution between external beam radiotherapy techniques was assessed using an anthropomorphic head phantom. The prescribed dose was 60Gy_RBE in 4 fractions to a typical posterior pole uveal melanoma. Clinically relevant structures were delineated, and doses were calculated using radiotherapy treatment planning softwares and measured using Gafchromic dosimetry films inserted at the ocular level.

RESULTS

Precision was significantly better with ocular PT than both PBS or SBRT in terms of beam penumbra (80%-20%: laterally 1.4 vs. ≥10mm, distally 0.8 vs. ≥2.5mm). Ocular PT duration was shorter, allowing eye gating and lid sparing more easily. Tumor was excellent with all modalities, but ocular PT resulted in more homogenous and conformal dose compared to PBS or SBRT. The maximal dose to ocular/orbital structures at risk was smaller and often null with ocular PT compared to other modalities. Mean dose to ocular/orbital structures was also lower with ocular PT. Structures like the lids and lacrimal punctum could be preserved with ocular PT using gaze orientation and lid retractors, which is easier to implement clinically than with the other modalities. The dose to distant organs was null with ocular PT and PBS, in contrast to SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

ocular PT showed significantly improved beam penumbra, shorter treatment delivery time, better dose homogeneity, and reduced maximal/mean doses to critical ocular structures compared with other current external beam radiation modalities. Similar comparisons may be warranted for other tumor presentations.

Improving Organs-at-Risk Sparing for Choroidal Melanoma Patients: A CT-based Two-Beam Strategy in Ocular Proton Therapy with a Dedicated Eyeline

PURPOSE

To investigate the potential clinical benefit of a two-beam arrangement technique using three-dimensional (3D) imaging of uveal melanoma (UM) patients treated with proton therapy and a dedicated eyeline.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Retrospective CT-based treatment plans of 39 UM patients performed using a single beam (SB) were compared to plans with two beams (TB) optimized for better trade-offs in organs-at-risk sparing. The RBE-weighted prescribed dose was 60 Gy (D_{RBE, GTV} = 60 Gy) in four fractions, assuming an RBE of 1.1. Dosimetric findings were analyzed for three patient groups based on tumor-optic nerve distance and UM staging (group GrA: ≤ 3 mm, T1 T2 UM; GrB: ≤ 3 mm, T3 UM; GrC: > 3 mm, T1 T2 T3 UM). Finally, two schedules were compared on biologically effective dose (BED): both beams being delivered either the same day (TB) or on alternate days (TBalter).

RESULTS

All strategies resulted in dosimetrically acceptable plans. A dose reduction to the anterior structures was achieved in 23/39 cases with the two-beam plans. D_25% was significantly lowered compared to SB plans by 12.4 and 15.4 Gy RBE-weighted median dose in GrA and GrB, respectively. D_2% was reduced by 18.6 and 6.0 Gy RBE-weighted median dose in GrA and GrB, respectively. A cost to the optic nerve was observed with a median difference up to 3.8 Gy RBE-weighted dose in GrB. BED differences were statistically significant for all considered parameters in favor of two beams delivered the same day.

CONCLUSION

A two-beam strategy appears beneficial for posterior tumors abutting the optic nerve. This strategy might have a positive impact on the risk of ocular complications.

Technical Note: Impact of Beam Properties for Uveal Melanoma Proton Therapy - An In-Silico Planning Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of beam quality in terms of distal fall-off (DFO, 90% to 10%) and lateral penumbra (LP, 80% to 20%) of single beam ocular proton treatment (OPT) and to derive resulting ideal requirements for future systems.

METHODS

Nine different beam models with DFO varying between 1 mm and 4 mm and LP between 1 mm and 4 mm were created. Beam models were incorporated into the RayStation with RayOcular TPS version 10 B (RaySearch Laboratories, Sweden). Each beam model was applied for eight typical clinical cases, covering different sizes and locations of uveal melanoma. Plans with and without an additional wedge were created, resulting in 117 plans with a total prescribed median dose of 60 Gy(RBE) to the CTV. Treatment plans were analyzed in terms of V20-V80 penumbra volume, D1 (dose to 1% of the volume) for optic disc and macula, optic nerve V30 (volume receiving 30 Gy(RBE), i.e. 50% of prescription), as well as average dose to lens and ciliary body. A LP dependent aperture margin was based on estimated uncertainties, ranging from 1.7 mm to 4.0 mm.

RESULTS

V20-V80 showed a strong influence by LP, while DFO was less relevant. The optic disc D1 reached an extra dose of up to 3000 cGy(RBE), comparing the defined technical limit of DFO = LP = 1 mm with DFO = 3 mm/ LP = 4 mm. The latter may result from a pencil-beam scanning (PBS) system with static apertures. Plans employing a wedge showed an improvement for organs at risk (OAR) sparing.

CONCLUSION

Plan quality is strongly influenced by initial beam parameters. The impact of LP is more pronounced when compared to DFO. The latter becomes important in the treatment of posterior tumors near the macula, optic disc or optic nerve. The plan quality achieved by dedicated OPT nozzles in single- or double-scattering design might not be achievable with modified PBS systems. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Quality of life and treatment-related burden during ocular proton therapy: a prospective trial of 131 patients with uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Proton beam therapy is a well-established treatment option for patients with uveal melanoma (UM). The treatment procedure, in general, includes placing radiopaque clips to ensure exact eye-positioning during radiotherapy, followed by the delivery of proton irradiation. The short-term burden associated with proton therapy in patients with UM has rarely been addressed. In this prospective study, we investigated the physiological and psychological aspects of proton therapy that might affect the well-being of patients during the different stages of treatment.

METHODS

During the treatment procedure, we conducted longitudinal assessments of the Quality of life (QOL), organ-specific symptoms, and psychological aspects in patients with UM with three questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-OPT30, and GAD-7). Patients completed questionnaires before clip surgery (T0), before proton therapy (T1), after completing treatment (T2), and three months after treatment completion (T3). We also collected data on tumor characteristics and socio-demographics to identify potential risk factors associated with high treatment burdens.

RESULTS

We prospectively included 131 consecutive patients. Questionnaire data showed a significant, temporary decline in global QOL and an increase in eye-related symptoms, as a result of the clip surgery (T0-T1). After treatment completion (T2), global QOL improved gradually, and none of the eye-related symptoms significantly deteriorated over the course of proton therapy. The global QOL returned to baseline levels three months after treatment (T3). We identified baseline anxiety as an independent risk factor for experiencing an acute treatment-related burden. Furthermore, we found interactions between GAD7 and patient sex showing that anxiety had a more pronounced effect on QOL outcome in female patients.

CONCLUSION

The short-term treatment-related burden of ocular proton therapy appeared to be largely associated with the preceding clip surgery, rather than the irradiation procedure. We found that anxiety was strongly associated with experiencing QOL issues during the treatment procedure. Our findings could contribute to the development of future strategies for improving the treatment process and psycho-oncologic patient care.

Characterization of the HollandPTC proton therapy beamline dedicated to uveal melanoma treatment and an interinstitutional comparison

PURPOSE

Eye-dedicated proton therapy (PT) facilities are used to treat malignant intraocular lesions, especially uveal melanoma (UM). The first commercial ocular PT beamline from Varian was installed in the Netherlands. In this work, the conceptual design of the new eyeline is presented. In addition, a comprehensive comparison against five PT centers with dedicated ocular beamlines is performed, and the clinical impact of the identified differences is analyzed.

MATERIAL/METHODS

The HollandPTC eyeline was characterized. Four centers in Europe and one in the United States joined the study. All centers use a cyclotron for proton beam generation and an eye-dedicated nozzle. Differences among the chosen ocular beamlines were in the design of the nozzle, nominal energy, and energy spectrum. The following parameters were collected for all centers: technical characteristics and a set of distal, proximal, and lateral region measurements. The measurements were performed with detectors available in-house at each institution. The institutions followed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series (TRS)-398 Code of Practice for absolute dose measurement, and the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice, its modified version or International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report No. 78 for spread-out Bragg peak normalization. Energy spreads of the pristine Bragg peaks were obtained with Monte Carlo simulations using Geant4. Seven tumor-specific case scenarios were simulated to evaluate the clinical impact among centers: small, medium, and large UM, located either anteriorly, at the equator, or posteriorly within the eye. Differences in the depth dose distributions were calculated.

RESULTS

A pristine Bragg peak of HollandPTC eyeline corresponded to the constant energy of 75 MeV (maximal range 3.97 g/cm2 in water) with an energy spread of 1.10 MeV. The pristine Bragg peaks for the five participating centers varied from 62.50 to 104.50 MeV with an energy spread variation between 0.10 and 0.70 MeV. Differences in the average distal fall-offs and lateral penumbrae (LPs) (over the complete set of clinically available beam modulations) among all centers were up to 0.25 g/cm2 , and 0.80 mm, respectively. Average distal fall-offs of the HollandPTC eyeline were 0.20 g/cm2 , and LPs were between 1.50 and 2.15 mm from proximal to distal regions, respectively. Treatment time, around 60 s, was comparable among all centers. The virtual source-to-axis distance of 120 cm at HollandPTC was shorter than for the five participating centers (range: 165-350 cm). Simulated depth dose distributions demonstrated the impact of the different beamline characteristics among institutions. The largest difference was observed for a small UM located at the posterior pole, where a proximal dose between two extreme centers was up to 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

HollandPTC eyeline specifications are in accordance with five other ocular PT beamlines. Similar clinical concepts can be applied to expect the same high local tumor control. Dosimetrical properties among the six institutions induce most likely differences in ocular radiation-related toxicities. This interinstitutional comparison could support further research on ocular post-PT complications. Finally, the findings reported in this study could be used to define dosimetrical guidelines for ocular PT to unify the concepts among institutions.

Non-invasive recognition of eye torsion through optical imaging of the iris pattern in ocular proton therapy

The introduction of non-invasive imaging techniques such as MRI imaging for treatment planning and optical eye tracking for in-room eye localization would obviate the requirement of clips implantation for many patients undergoing ocular proton therapy. This study specifically addresses the issue of torsional eye movement detection during patient positioning. Non-invasive detection of eye torsion is performed by measuring the iris pattern rotations using a beams eye view optical camera. When handling images of patients to be treated using proton therapy, a number of additional challenges are encountered, such as changing eye position, pupil dilatation and illumination. A method is proposed to address these extra challenges while also compensating for the effect of cornea distortion in eye torsion computation. The accuracy of the proposed algorithm was evaluated against corresponding measurement of eye torsion using the clips configuration measured on x-ray images. This study involves twenty patients who received ocular proton therapy at Paul Scherrer Institute and it is covered by ethical approval (EKNZ 2019-01987).

Convolutional Neural Networks Cascade for Automatic Pupil and Iris Detection in Ocular Proton Therapy

Eye tracking techniques based on deep learning are rapidly spreading in a wide variety of application fields. With this study, we want to exploit the potentiality of eye tracking techniques in ocular proton therapy (OPT) applications. We implemented a fully automatic approach based on two-stage convolutional neural networks (CNNs): the first stage roughly identifies the eye position and the second one performs a fine iris and pupil detection. We selected 707 video frames recorded during clinical operations during OPT treatments performed at our institute. 650 frames were used for training and 57 for a blind test. The estimations of iris and pupil were evaluated against the manual labelled contours delineated by a clinical operator. For iris and pupil predictions, Dice coefficient (median = 0.94 and 0.97), Szymkiewicz–Simpson coefficient (median = 0.97 and 0.98), Intersection over Union coefficient (median = 0.88 and 0.94) and Hausdorff distance (median = 11.6 and 5.0 (pixels)) were quantified. Iris and pupil regions were found to be comparable to the manually labelled ground truths. Our proposed framework could provide an automatic approach to quantitatively evaluating pupil and iris misalignments, and it could be used as an additional support tool for clinical activity, without impacting in any way with the consolidated routine.

Development and validation of a new set-up simulator dedicated to ocular proton therapy at CNAO

An Eye Tracking System (ETS) is used at CNAO for providing a stable and reproducible ocular proton therapy (OPT) set-up, featuring a fixation light (FL) and monitoring stereo-cameras embedded in a rigid case. The aim of this work is to propose an ETS set-up simulation algorithm, that automatically provides the FL positioning in space, according to patient-specific gaze direction and avoiding interferences with patient, beam and collimator. Two configurations are provided: one in the CT room for acquiring images required for treatment planning with the patient lying on a couch, and one related to the treatment room with the patient sitting in front of the beam. Algorithm validation was performed reproducing ETS simulation (CT) and treatment (room) set-up for 30 patients previously treated at CNAO. The positioning accuracy of the device was quantified through a set of 14 control points applied to the ETS case and localizable both in the CT volume and in room X-ray images. Differences between the position of ETS reference points estimated by the algorithm and those measured by imaging systems are reported. The corresponding gaze direction deviation is on average 0.2° polar and 0.3° azimuth for positioning in CT room and 0.1° polar and 0.4° azimuth in the treatment room. The simulation algorithm was embedded in a clinically usable software application, which we assessed as capable of ensuring ETS positioning with an average accuracy of 2 mm in CT room and 1.5 mm in treatment room, corresponding to gaze direction deviations consistently lower than 1°.

Three-dimensional MRI-based treatment planning approach for non-invasive ocular proton therapy

PURPOSE

To develop a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based treatment planning approach for uveal melanomas (UM) in proton therapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

For eight patients with UM, a segmentation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs) was performed on T1- and T2-weighted 7 Tesla MRI image data to reconstruct the patient MR-eye. An extended contour was defined with a 2.5-mm isotropic margin derived from the GTV. A broad beam algorithm, which we have called πDose, was implemented to calculate relative proton absorbed doses to the ipsilateral OARs. Clinically favorable gazing angles of the treated eye were assessed by calculating a global weighted-sum objective function, which set penalties for OARs and extreme gazing angles. An optimizer, which we have named OPT'im-Eye-Tool, was developed to tune the parameters of the functions for sparing critical-OARs.

RESULTS

In total, 441 gazing angles were simulated for every patient. Target coverage including margins was achieved in all the cases (V95%  > 95%). Over the whole gazing angles solutions space, maximum dose (Dmax ) to the optic nerve and the macula, and mean doses (Dmean ) to the lens, the ciliary body and the sclera were calculated. A forward optimization was applied by OPT'im-Eye-Tool in three different prioritizations: iso-weighted, optic nerve prioritized, and macula prioritized. In each, the function values were depicted in a selection tool to select the optimal gazing angle(s). For example, patient 4 had a T2 equatorial tumor. The optimization applied for the straight gazing angle resulted in objective function values of 0.46 (iso-weighted situation), 0.90 (optic nerve prioritization) and 0.08 (macula prioritization) demonstrating the impact of that angle in different clinical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility and suitability of a 3D MRI-based treatment planning approach have been successfully tested on a cohort of eight patients diagnosed with UM. Moreover, a gaze-angle trade-off dose optimization with respect to OARs sparing has been developed. Further validation of the whole treatment process is the next step in the goal to achieve both a non-invasive and a personalized proton therapy treatment.

Ophthalmic Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Where Are We (Heading To)?

Magnetic resonance imaging of the eye and orbit (MReye) is a cross-domain research field, combining (bio)physics, (bio)engineering, physiology, data sciences and ophthalmology. A growing number of reports document technical innovations of MReye and promote their application in preclinical research and clinical science. Realizing the progress and promises, this review outlines current trends in MReye. Examples of MReye strategies and their clinical relevance are demonstrated. Frontier applications in ocular oncology, refractive surgery, ocular muscle disorders and orbital inflammation are presented and their implications for explorations into ophthalmic diseases are provided. Substantial progress in anatomically detailed, high-spatial resolution MReye of the eye, orbit and optic nerve is demonstrated. Recent developments in MReye of ocular tumors are explored, and its value for personalized eye models derived from machine learning in the treatment planning of uveal melanoma and evaluation of retinoblastoma is highlighted. The potential of MReye for monitoring drug distribution and for improving treatment management and the assessment of individual responses is discussed. To open a window into the eye and into (patho)physiological processes that in the past have been largely inaccessible, advances in MReye at ultrahigh magnetic field strengths are discussed. A concluding section ventures a glance beyond the horizon and explores future directions of MReye across multiple scales, including in vivo electrolyte mapping of sodium and other nuclei. This review underscores the need for the (bio)medical imaging and ophthalmic communities to expand efforts to find solutions to the remaining unsolved problems and technical obstacles of MReye, with the objective to transfer methodological advancements driven by MR physics into genuine clinical value.

Measuring eye deformation between planning and proton beam therapy position using magnetic resonance imaging

•

Eye and tumour deformation due to gravity is less than 0.4 mm.

•

Conformity index between flexed and supine position for eyes is >0.95.

•

Conformity index between flexed and supine position for tumours is >0.85.

•

Supinely acquired MR images can be used for PBT planning.

Proton beam therapy (PBT) for uveal melanoma (UM) is performed in sitting position, while the acquisition of the Magnetic resonance (MR)-images for treatment planning is performed in supine position. We assessed the effect of this difference in position on the eye- and tumour- shape. Seven subjects and six UM-patients were scanned in supine and a seating mimicking position. The distances between the tumour/sclera in both positions were calculated. The median distance between both positions was 0.1 mm. Change in gravity direction produced no substantial changes in sclera and tumour shape, indicating that supinely acquired MR-images can be used to plan ocular-PBT.

Practice Considerations for Proton Beam Radiation Therapy of Uveal Melanoma During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic: Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group Ocular Experience

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare but life-threatening cancer of the eye. In light of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, hospitals and proton eye therapy facilities must analyze several factors to ensure appropriate treatment protocols for patients and provider teams. Practice considerations to limit COVID-19 transmission in the proton ocular treatment setting for UM are necessary. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group is the largest international community of particle/proton therapy providers. Participating experts have current or former affiliation with the member institutions of the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group Ocular subcommittee with long-standing high-volume proton ocular programs. The practices reviewed in this document must be taken in conjunction with local hospital procedures, multidisciplinary recommendations, and regional/national guidelines, as each community may have its unique needs, supplies, and protocols. Importantly, as the pandemic evolves, so will the strategies and recommendations. Given the unique circumstances for UM patients, along with indications of potential ophthalmologic transmission as a result of health care providers working in close proximity to patients and intrinsic infectious risk from eyelashes, tears, and hair, practice strategies may be adapted to reduce the risk of viral transmission. Certainly, providers and health care systems will continue to examine and provide as safe and effective care as possible for patients in the current environment.

Technical Note: Benchmarking automated eye tracking and human detection for motion monitoring in ocular proton therapy

PURPOSE

Ocular proton therapy is an effective therapeutic option for patients affected with uveal melanomas. An optical eye-tracking system (ETS) aiming at noninvasive motion monitoring was developed and tested in a clinical scenario.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ETS estimates eye position and orientation at 25 frames per second using the three-dimensional position of pupil and cornea curvature centers identified, in the treatment room, through stereoscopic optical imaging and infrared eye illumination. Its capabilities for automatic detection of eye motion were retrospectively evaluated on 60 treatment fractions. Then, the ETS performance was benchmarked against the clinical standard based on visual control and manual beam interruption.

RESULTS

Eye-tracking system detected eye position successfully in 97% of all available frames. Eye-tracking system-based eye monitoring during therapy guarantees quicker response to involuntary eye motions than manual beam interruptions and avoids unnecessary beam interruptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Eye-tracking system shows promise for on-line monitoring of eye motion. Its introduction in the clinical workflow will guarantee a swifter treatment course for the patient and the clinical personnel.

Myths and realities of range uncertainty

Range uncertainty is a much discussed topic in proton therapy. Although a very real aspect of proton therapy, its magnitude and consequences are sometimes misunderstood or overestimated. In this article, the sources and consequences of range uncertainty are reviewed, a number of myths associated with the effect discussed with the aim of putting range uncertainty into clinical context and attempting to de-bunk some of the more exaggerated claims made as to its consequences.

Oncologic and visual outcomes after postoperative proton therapy of localized conjunctival melanomas

Introduction

conjunctival melanomas have high local relapse rates. Oncologic and visual outcomes can be improved with proton therapy and no-touch surgery.

Material and methods

a monocentric retrospective study of consecutive patients treated with surgery and proton therapy for conjunctival melanoma was conducted. Proton therapy was performed to a total dose of 45 Grays physical dose delivered in eight fractions over two weeks.

Results

Ninety-two patients were included. The mean age was 63-year-old. 65.2% of patients had primary acquired melanosis. The mean tumor thickness and diameter was 2.5 mm and 7.0 mm respectively. The clinical stage was T1 in 71.6% of cases, with a quadrangular involvement of more than 90° in 69% of cases. Conjunctival melanomas were of epithelioid cell-type in 40% of cases. Mean follow-up was 4.7 years. Five-year local failure rate was 33.2%. Of 25 local recurrences, 14 were marginal/out-of-field, 4 in-field, others were undetermined. First surgery at expert center resulted in 24.3% of local failure at 5 years versus 38.7% if performed elsewhere (p = 0.41). Salvage exenteration was performed in 13 patients. Tumor stage and quadrangular involvement were significant factors for local failure. Five-year progression-free survival and cause-specific death rates were 61.5 and 3.6%. Stage and epithelioid type were associated with poorer progression-free survival. Trophic toxicity occurred in 22.9% of patients and was treated locally, with grafts in 7 patients. Glaucoma and cataract occurred in 13 and 22 patients respectively. Prognostic factors for visual deterioration were age, tumor extent (multifocality, quadrangular involvement > 180°) and cryotherapy.

Conclusions

5-year local failure rate after postoperative proton therapy for conjunctival melanoma was of 33.2%. Radiation-induced complications were overall manageable.

Radiation induced optic neuropathy: Does treatment modality influence the risk?

Radiation induced optic neuropathy (RION) is a rare but disastrous complication of radiation therapy in treatment of periorbital tumors. The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence of RION in series of patients treated from peri orbital tumors by recent photon and proton irradiation modalities. We searched the Pub Med database for studies in periorbital tumors including base of skull, sinonasal, pituitary, nasopharyngeal tumors and craniopharyngioma treated with Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and with proton beam therapy (PBT) between 1992 and 2017 excluding metastatic tumors, lymphomas, pediatric series, those treated mainly with chemotherapy, target therapy and those written in languages other than English and French. The result retrieved 421 articles that were revised by the panel. Fourteen articles with IMRT and 27 with PBT reported usable data for the review from which 31studies that had pointed to the doses to the optic nerve (ON) and/or optic chiasm (OC) and incidence of RION have been analyzed. We have found that the incidence of RION had been reported fairly in both modalities and many other factors related to the patient, tumor, and irradiation process interplay in its development. We have concluded that proper treatment planning, good selection of treatment modality, adherence to dose constraints applied to critical structures all along with regular oncological and ophthalmological follow up, control of co-morbidities and early intervention, could help reducing its magnitude.

Novel Gd3+-doped silica-based optical fiber material for dosimetry in proton therapy

Optical fibers hold promise for accurate dosimetry in small field proton therapy due to their superior spatial resolution and the lack of significant Cerenkov contamination in proton beams. One known drawback for most scintillation detectors is signal quenching in areas of high linear energy transfer, as is the case in the Bragg peak region of a proton beam. In this study, we investigated the potential of innovative optical fiber bulk materials using the sol-gel technique for dosimetry in proton therapy. This type of glass is made of amorphous silica (SiO\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${}_{2}$$\end{document}2) and is doped with Gd\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${}^{3+}$$\end{document}3+ ions and possesses very interesting light emission properties with a luminescence band around 314 nm when exposed to protons. The fibers were manufactured at the University of Lille and tested at the TRIUMF Proton Therapy facility with 8.2–62.9 MeV protons and 2–6 nA of extracted beam current. Dose-rate dependence and quenching were measured and compared to other silica-based fibers also made by sol-gel techniques and doped with Ce\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${}^{3+}$$\end{document}3+ and Cu\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${}^{+}$$\end{document}+. The three fibers present strong luminescence in the UV (Gd) or visible (Cu,Ce) under irradiation, with the emission intensities related directly to the proton flux. In addition, the 0.5 mm diameter Gd\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${}^{3+}$$\end{document}3+-doped fiber shows superior resolution of the Bragg peak, indicating significantly reduced quenching in comparison to the Ce\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${}^{3+}$$\end{document}3+ and Cu\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${}^{+}$$\end{document}+ fibers with a Birks’ constant, k\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${}_{B}$$\end{document}B, of (0.0162 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm $$\end{document}± 0.0003) cm/MeV in comparison to (0.0333 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm $$\end{document}± 0.0006) cm/MeV and (0.0352 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm $$\end{document}± 0.0003) cm/MeV, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first report of such an interesting k\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${}_{B}$$\end{document}B for a silica-based optical fiber material, showing clearly that this fiber presents lower quenching than common plastic scintillators. This result demonstrates the high potential of this inorganic fiber material for proton therapy dosimetry.

A platform for patient positioning and motion monitoring in ocular proton therapy with a non-dedicated beamline

PURPOSE

At Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO, Pavia, Italy) ocular proton therapy (OPT) is delivered using a non-dedicated beamline. This paper describes the novel clinical workflow as well as technologies and methods adopted to achieve accurate target positioning and verification during ocular proton therapy at CNAO.

METHOD

The OPT clinical protocol at CNAO prescribes a treatment simulation and a delivery phase, performed in the CT and treatment rooms, respectively. The patient gaze direction is controlled and monitored during the entire workflow by means of an eye tracking system (ETS) featuring two optical cameras and an embedded fixation diode light. Thus, the accurate alignment of the fixation light provided to the patient to the prescribed gazed direction is required for an effective treatment. As such, a technological platform based on active robotic manipulators and IR optical tracking-based guidance was developed and tested. The effectiveness of patient positioning strategies was evaluated on a clinical dataset comprising twenty patients treated at CNAO.

RESULTS

According to experimental testing, the developed technologies guarantee uncertainties lower than one degree in gaze direction definition by means of ETS-guided positioning. Patient positioning and monitoring strategies during treatment effectively mitigated set-up uncertainties and exhibited sub-millimetric accuracy in radiopaque markers alignment.

CONCLUSION

Ocular proton therapy is currently delivered at CNAO with a non-dedicated beamline. The technologies developed for patient positioning and motion monitoring have proven to be compliant with the high geometrical accuracy required for the treatment of intraocular tumors.