Hypofractionated Nodal Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer Was Not Associated With Increased Patient-Reported Arm or Brachial Plexopathy Symptoms

The Efficacy and Toxicity of Hypofractionated Regional Nodal Irradiation in Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) is increasingly used in place of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in carefully selected breast cancer patients. Although hypofractioned whole breast irradiation is standard for node-negative disease, long-term data on hypofractionated RNI (HF-RNI) are limited. This study aims to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of HF-RNI for breast cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective analysis included 154 patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer treated with HF-RNI (>2 Gy/fraction) between 2008 and 2020. Median dose was 40 Gy/16 fractions to the breast, chest wall, or reconstructed breast as well as regional nodes. The primary endpoint was the incidence of chronic toxicity. Secondary endpoints were acute toxicity, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Acute toxicities were defined as those occurring during radiation therapy or within 90 days post-treatment; chronic toxicities were defined as those persisting or arising at least 180 days after radiation completion.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 65.4 months (range, 4-170 months). Median age was 58 years (interquartile range, 48.3-71.0). Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 49.4% of patients, 47.4% underwent ALND, and 3.2% had no axillary surgery. RNI targets included supraclavicular and axillary level 1 to 3 nodes in 65.6% of patients, whereas 34.4% were treated only to the supraclavicular and level 3 nodes. There were 7 (4.7%) patients that had internal mammary nodes treated. Chronic brachial plexopathy occurred in 2.0% of patients, limited range of motion in 1.3%, and upper extremity lymphedema in 10.5%. Late cardiac and lung toxicity rates were low at 0.7% and 3.3%, respectively. Five-year actuarial rates of LRFS, RRFS, DFS, and OS were 98.0%, 99.3%, 90.1%, and 88.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HF-RNI demonstrates low rates of chronic toxicity and excellent disease control, supporting wider adoption in clinical practice. Long-term results of randomized trials of HF-RNI are needed for definitive evidence.

Dose constraints in breast cancer radiotherapy. A critical review

Radiotherapy plays an essential role in the treatment of breast cancer (BC). Recent advances in treatment technology and radiobiological knowledge have a major impact in BC patients with locoregional disease as the majority are now long-term survivors. Over the last three decades, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) techniques, together with the increasing adoption of moderately hypofractionated and ultra-hypofractionated treatment schedules as well as the possibility to offer partial breast radiotherapy to a well-defined patient subset have significantly changed radiotherapy for BC patients. As dose-volume constraints (DVCs) have to be adapted to these new treatment paradigms we have reviewed available evidence-based data concerning dose-constraints for the main organs at risk (OARs) that apply to the treatment of whole breast/chest wall radiotherapy, whole breast/chest wall radiotherapy including regional nodal irradiation (RNI) and partial breast irradiation (PBI), for the most relevant fractionation schedules that have been introduced recently. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary that may help to harmonize treatment planning strategies.

The Role of Surgery in the Management of Radiation-Induced Brachial Plexopathy

Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) is a rare long-term complication of radiation therapy often causing pain, motor deficit, and overall quality of life reduction for affected patients. While a standard treatment for RIBP is yet to be established, management consists mostly of symptom management through the use of medications and physical therapy. There is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of surgical treatment. Omentoplasties and other vascularized flaps are commonly discussed options for eliminating neuropathic pain associated with RIBP. However, these approaches show no meaningful improvement in motor function. While limited, current literature suggests that nerve transfers may be an option for relief of neuropathic pain as well as restoration of motor function. This review of literature explores the options available to those affected by RIBP with a focus on the role of surgery.

Randomised controlled trials on radiation dose fractionation in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis with emphasis on side effects and cosmesis

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive assessment of various fractionation schemes in radiation therapy for breast cancer, with a focus on side effects, cosmesis, quality of life, risks of recurrence, and survival outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to 23 October 2023).

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies were randomised controlled trials focusing on conventional fractionation (CF; daily fractions of 1.8-2 Gy, reaching a total dose of 50-50.4 Gy over 5-6 weeks), moderate hypofractionation (MHF; fraction sizes of 2.65-3.3 Gy for 13-16 fractions over 3-5 weeks), and/or ultra-hypofractionation (UHF; schedule of only 5 fractions).

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent investigators screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach, respectively.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was analysed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistic. Network meta-analysis was used to integrate all available evidence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The pre-specified primary outcome was grade ≥2 acute radiation dermatitis and late radiation therapy related side effects; secondary outcomes included cosmesis, quality of life, recurrence, and survival metrics.

RESULTS

From 1754 studies, 59 articles representing 35 trials (20 237 patients) were assessed; 21.6% of outcomes showed low risk of bias, whereas 78.4% had some concerns or high risk, particularly in outcome measurement (47.4%). The RR for grade ≥2 acute radiation dermatitis for MHF compared with CF was 0.54 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.61; P<0.001) and 0.68 (0.49 to 0.93; P=0.02) following breast conserving therapy and mastectomy, respectively. Hyperpigmentation and grade ≥2 breast shrinkage were less frequent after MHF than after CF, with RRs of 0.77 (0.62 to 0.95; P=0.02) and 0.92 (0.85 to 0.99; P=0.03), respectively, in the combined breast conserving therapy and mastectomy population. However, in the breast conserving therapy only trials, these differences in hyperpigmentation (RR 0.79, 0.60 to 1.03; P=0.08) and breast shrinkage (0.94, 0.83 to 1.07; P=0.35) were not statistically significant. The RR for grade ≥2 acute radiation dermatitis for UHF compared with MHF was 0.85 (0.47 to 1.55; P=0.60) for breast conserving therapy and mastectomy patients combined. MHF was associated with improved cosmesis and quality of life compared with CF, whereas data on UHF were less conclusive. Survival and recurrence outcomes were similar between UHF, MHF, and CF.

CONCLUSIONS

MHF shows improved safety profile, cosmesis, and quality of life compared with CF while maintaining equivalent oncological outcomes. Fewer randomised controlled trials have compared UHF with other fractionation schedules, but its safety and oncological effectiveness seem to be similar with short term follow-up. Given the advantages of reduced treatment time, enhanced convenience for patients, and potential cost effectiveness, MHF and UHF should be considered as preferred options over CF in appropriate clinical settings, with further research needed to solidify these findings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023460249.

Brachial plexopathy after breast cancer: A persistent late effect of radiotherapy

Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) is an iatrogenic, progressively disabling, and often very late effect of adjuvant radiotherapy most commonly seen in breast cancer survivors but also in those treated for lymphoma, lung, and head and neck cancers. In late-onset RIBP following breast cancer, the nerve injury is chronic and irreversible, occurring more commonly when axillary and/or supraclavicular nodes have been irradiated, as well as the breast/chest wall. RIBP is manifested initially by paresthesia, hypoesthesia, dysesthesia, and later by weakness in the ipsilateral hand with those symptoms progressing distally to proximally up through the shoulder. Depressed/absent deep tendon reflexes in the upper extremity and muscle fasciculations occur also. Neither patients nor their health care providers tend to associate these unusual neurological symptoms with cancer treatments received ≥20 years prior, often failing to link these sensory-motor symptoms with radiotherapy decades before. Because long-term follow-up of these patients now typically falls to general practitioners, many cases may be missed or misdiagnosed because of the rarity of this disorder. Physiatrists and allied rehabilitation professionals must be aware of this progressively disabling, incurable condition to provide appropriate diagnoses and compensatory rehabilitation therapies. Additionally, professional oncology organizations should include RIBP in their long-term, survivorship guidelines for breast cancer. Researchers examining the iatrogenic late effects of radiotherapy should extend their follow-up periods well beyond the current 5-6 years to ascertain the true incidence of RIBP today. Rehabilitation providers must continue to advocate for awareness, diagnosis, and management of iatrogenic outcomes experienced by long-term cancer survivors.

Moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer: preferences amongst radiation oncologists from countries in Latin America and the Caribbean

Background

The safety and effectiveness of moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer were demonstrated by several trials. This study aimed to evaluate the current patterns of practice and prescription preference about moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy to assess possible aspects that affect the decision-making process regarding the use of fractionation in breast cancer patients in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). We also aimed to identify factors that can restrain the utilization of moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer.

Materials an methods

Radiation oncologists from LAC were invited to contribute to this study. A 38-question survey was used to evaluate their opinions.

Results

A total of 173 radiation oncologists from 13 countries answered the questionnaire. The majority of respondents (84.9%) preferred moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy as their first choice in cases of whole breast irradiation. Whole breast plus regional nodal irradiation, post-mastectomy (chest wall and regional nodal irradiation) without reconstruction, and post-mastectomy (chest wall and regional node irradiation) with reconstruction hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy was preferred by 72.2% 71.1%, and 53.7% of respondents, respectively. Breast cancer stage, and flap-based breast reconstruction were the factors associated with absolute contraindications for the use of hypofractionated schedules.

Conclusion

Even though moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer is considered a new standard to the vast majority of the patients, its unrestricted application in clinical practice across LAC still faces reluctance.

[Radiation induced brachial plexopathy: Diagnosis, risk factors, principles of care]

Radiation plexitis, also known as radiation-induced brachial neuropathy is a rare toxicity following axillary, breast, cervical or thoracic radiotherapy, first described in 1966 by Stoll and Andrew. Although improvements in radiotherapy techniques have greatly reduced its risk over the past seventy years, its severe form remains a dreaded complication that is difficult to manage in patients with increased life expectancy. This article summarizes the epidemiological elements, risk factors, diagnostic methods, doses and constraints to be respected in radiotherapy and the treatment strategies of radiation plexitis.

Moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer: A Brazilian cohort study

Background

Results from numerous clinical trials have led to a consensus that moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy is the ideal postoperative irradiation treatment plan in patients with breast cancer (BC). However, there are specific situations such as chest wall (with or without breast reconstruction) and regional node irradiation that still face obstacles in its widespread use. There is a lack of evidence supporting the use of moderately hypofractionated irradiation from the Latin American context. This study aims to describe the profile and clinical outcomes of patients treated with moderate hypofractionation for both early-stage (Stage I and II) and locally advanced BC (Stage III) regardless of the type of surgery in a Brazilian Oncology Center.

Methods

All patients with non-metastatic BC who were treated with moderately hypofractionated schedules of 40Gy in 15 fractions or 42.4Gy in 16 fractions between 2010 to 2019 at Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brazil were retrospectively analyzed. The rates of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), distance recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Acute and late toxicity profiles were accessed for the entire cohort.

Findings

A total of 670 patients were included. The median age was 57 years and the median follow-up time was 31 months. Most of the patients had stage I and II breast cancer, and 81.6% underwent breast-conserving surgery. Of the 123 women who underwent mastectomy treatment, 29% (n = 37) had immediate reconstruction with implants and 28% (n = 35) with autologous tissue. Seventy-one per cent of the patients presented luminal subtype tumour and 84.3% received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Chemotherapy was administered to almost half of the patients and all 80 patients with Her-2 positive disease received trastuzumab-based systemic therapy. One-third of patients received regional node irradiation; boost was performed in 41.1% of treatments. The 5-year LRFS, RRFS, DRFS and OS was 95.6%, 97.6%,92.2% and 95.9%, respectively. Acute and late side effects profile were mild and only 2.9% of patients developed grade 3 dermatitis. Among patients with breast implants, 11.4% had capsular contracture.

Interpretation

In this Brazilian institution experience, moderately hypofractionated irradiation to the breast, chest wall (with or without breast reconstruction), and regional lymph nodes was safe and with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Funding

None.

Breast Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: the Radiation Oncology Perspective

Purpose of Review

The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused disruption in healthcare throughout the world. The limitations placed on hospital resources and the need to limit potential exposure to SARS-CoV-2 for both patients and healthcare staff have affected oncologic care for patients with breast cancer (BC), including radiation therapy (RT). This review highlights published guidelines regarding the provision of radiotherapy for BC patients and their adoption by radiation oncology centers.

Recent Findings

Multiple international and national consortiums plus select institutions have published formal recommendations regarding radiation therapy for BC during the COVID-19 pandemic. They embody the principles of limiting in-person visits, proper triage, and the judicious use of delay, abbreviation, or omission of RT as appropriate.

Summary

Since the start of the pandemic, multiple publications have provided guidance regarding RT for BC during this challenging time. The pandemic has led to increased use of telemedicine and abbreviated radiation therapy courses in the setting of BC, which are likely to persist. Future research is needed to establish the effect of these changes on oncologic outcomes.

Evidence-based guidelines for hypofractionated radiation in breast cancer: conclusions of the Catalan expert working group

Introduction

Daily, moderate hypofractionation has become standard treatment for breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery, although substantial variation exists in its use. This paper describes the generation of consensus-based recommendations for the utilisation of this therapy at the healthcare system level and compares these to American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guidelines.

Materials and methods

Consensus-based guidelines were developed in three steps, including a systematic literature review and involvement of radiation oncologists specialising in breast cancer in Catalonia: (a) creation of a working group and evidence review; (b) consideration of the levels of evidence and agreement on the formulation of survey questions; and (c) performance of survey and development of consensus-based recommendations. Results were compared to the ASTRO recommendations.

Results

Consensus was above 80% for 10 of the 14 survey items. Experts supported hypofractionated radiotherapy for all breast cancer patients aged 40 years or more; with invasive carcinoma and breast-conserving surgery; without radiation of lymph nodes; and regardless of the tumour size, histological grade, molecular subtype, breast size, laterality, other treatment characteristics, or need for a boost. Over half favoured its use in all situations, even where available scientific evidence is insufficient. The resulting recommendations and the quality of the evidence are comparable to those from ASTRO, despite some differences in the degree of consensus.

Conclusion

Specialists agree that hypofractionation is the standard treatment for breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery, but some specific areas require a higher level of evidence before unequivocally extending indications.

Symptoms Related to Brachial Plexus Neuropathy After Supraclavicular Irradiation and Boost in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of symptoms related to brachial plexus neuropathy (BPN) and the dose distribution to the brachial plexus (BP) in patients with breast cancertreated with supraclavicular (SCV) irradiation and boost.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this study, 117 patients with initial ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node (SLN) metastasis and 39 with recurrent SLN metastasis between 2008 and 2018 in our cancer center were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with 50 Gy of SCV irradiation in 25 fractions and a boost (median dose, 10 Gy; range, 10-16 Gy) to involved nodes in the SCV area. Symptoms related to BPN (including ipsilateral arm numbness, pain, and weakness) were recorded and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. The BP was delineated on simulation computed tomography, and the dose distributions to the BP were evaluated. Meanwhile, 297 patients treated with SCV irradiation without boost during the same period were identified as a control group to compare the incidences of BPN-related symptoms and dosimetric data with patients who received an SCV boost.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate was 80.3% for patients with initial SLN metastasis and 51.0% for patients with recurrent SLN metastasis. For patients who received an SCV boost, incidence rates of ipsilateral arm numbness, pain, and weakness were 23.9%, 18.3%, and 34.3%, respectively. Four patients (5.6%) developed grade 2 numbness and 3 (4.3%) developed grade 2 arm weakness. In the control group, incidence rates of arm numbness, pain, and weakness were 31.6%, 21.9%, and 36.0%, respectively. The incidence of BPN-related symptoms was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Symptoms of grade 3 were not observed in either cohort. The mean doses to the BP in patients who received boost and who did not were 56.8 and 46.8 Gy, respectively (P < .001). The maximum doses to the BP in patients who received boost and who did not were 64.5 and 53.5 Gy, respectively (P < .001). The BP volumes receiving at least 50 Gy, 60 Gy, 61 Gy, and 62 Gy were also significantly higher in the boosted group compared with the control group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that an SCV boost of 10 Gy did not increase the incidence of BPN-related symptoms and that the toxicity to the BP was acceptable. Comprehensive treatment including SCV irradiation and boost led to satisfactory survival outcomes in patients with breast cancer who had SLN metastasis.

Breast cancer hypofractionated radiotherapy in 2-weeks with 2D technique: 5-year clinical outcomes of a phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

To report clinical outcomes and late toxicities of a 2-week hypofractionated post-operative loco-regional radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This trial was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and registered with gov, no. NCT02460744. Between June 2013 and October 2014, 50 patients with breast cancer, post mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) were included in this study, of whom 10 had BCS. Patients were planned on a 2-dimentional (2D) simulator with 2 tangential fields and an incident supraclavicular field. Radiotherapy dose was 34 Gy/10#/2 weeks and a sequential boost of 10 Gy/5#/1 wk in BCS patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of acute skin toxicities previously reported. Here, we report the secondary end points of late toxicities, cosmesis, local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Late skin toxicities were recorded according to the Radiotherapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) scoring criteria. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed using the Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/RTOG breast cosmesis and the Late Effects Normal Tissue/Subjective Objective Management Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scales for the breast and chest wall, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of DFS and OS were calculated, and 5-year DFS and OS rates (with approximate 95% CIs) were estimated.

RESULTS

Late grade ≥ 2 chest wall induration, hypopigmentation and subcutaneous fibrosis were seen in 3 (6%), 3 (6%) and 1 (2%) patients, respectively. Chest wall cosmesis was excellent/good in 34 (72%) and fair/bad in 13 (28%) patients. In BCS patients, grade 2 skin induration, subcutaneous fibrosis and edema was observed in 1 patient (11%) each. Cosmesis was excellent/good in 7 (78%) and fair/bad in 2 (22%) patients. Late grade ≥ 2 arm edema, pain and shoulder stiffness were reported by 1 (2%), 2 (4%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. No local recurrences were observed. Five patients developed distant metastases (10%). Seven patients died (14%). The 5-year DFS and OS rate was 90% (95% CI: 77-96%) and 88% (95% CI: 75-94%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in 2 weeks in patients with breast cancer was associated with minimal late toxicity, good cosmetic outcome and excellent local control. This trial may be of relevance for developing countries where resources are limited.

Hypofractionated breast irradiation: a multidisciplinary review of the Senonetwork study group

The multidisciplinary management represents a crucial part of the care for cancer patients, resulting in better clinical and process outcomes, with evidence of improved survival among different cancer primary sites, including breast. According with international recommendations established by the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), all breast-cancer patients have to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team including radiologist, pathologist, surgeon, medical oncologist and radiation oncologist. Thus, variations in clinical practice of each specialty should be discussed and shared with all team members to guarantee a fruitful cooperation among the involved specialists. During the last decades, radiation treatment was deeply changed by the evidence-based adoption of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) as standard of treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery. Moreover, mature randomized data have showed that partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an effective and safe alternative to whole breast irradiation in selected patients with low-risk early-stage breast cancer. Based on this background, we reviewed indications and critical issues of HFRT and PBI analyzing impact of their adoption from a multidisciplinary perspective.

The use of moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer in clinical practice: A critical review

Post-operative radiation therapy (RT) reduces loco-regional recurrence rates and mortality in most patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this critical review is to provide an overview of the applicability of moderately hypofractionated RT for breast cancer patients, focusing on factors influencing clinical decision-making. An international group of radiation oncologists agreed to assess, integrate, and interpret the existing evidence into a practical report to guide clinicians in their daily management of breast cancer patients. We conclude that moderately hypofractionated RT to the breast, chest wall (with/without breast reconstruction), and regional lymph nodes is at least as safe and effective as conventionally fractionated regimens and could be considered as the treatment option for the vast majority of the patients.For those who are still concerned about its generalised application, we recommend participating in ongoing trials comparing moderately hypofractionated RT to conventionally fractionated RT for breast cancer patients in some clinical circumstances.

Recommendations for triage, prioritization and treatment of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) associated disease (COVID-19) outbreak seriously challenges globally all health care systems and professionals. Expert projections estimate that despite social distancing and lockdown being practiced, we have yet to feel the full impact of COVID-19. In this manuscript we provide guidance to prepare for the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer patients and advise on how to triage, prioritize and organize diagnostic procedures, surgical, radiation and medical treatments.

Variation in the use of radiotherapy fractionation for breast cancer: Survival outcome and cost implications

•

We evaluated the use of hypofractionation in breast radiotherapy in an Australian population-based cohort.

•

Hypofractionation appears underused for breast radiotherapy in Australia over time.

•

Variation in practice were observed by patient, tumour, sociodemographic and geographical factors.

•

This study highlights that evidence-based practice will translate to reduced health care treatment costs.

Background and purpose

Substantial variation in the adoption of hypofractionation for breast radiation therapy has been observed, despite the availability of consensus guidelines. This study aimed to investigate the variation in radiation therapy fractionation in breast cancer patients in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and to estimate survival outcome and cost implications.

Materials and methods

This is a population-based cohort of patients who received radiation therapy for breast cancer (2009–2013), as captured in the NSW Central Cancer Registry. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with fractionation type. Survival outcome was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Cost per treatment and potential cost saving associated with evidence-based fractionation was estimated.

Results

A total of 10,482 patients were available for analysis, divided into 3 cohorts (breast alone: N = 7000; breast + nodes: N = 1119; all chestwall: N = 2363). In multivariable analysis, increasing age, laterality (right), year of treatment (2013), early stage, lower socioeconomic status, and regional area of residence were independent predictors of hypofractionation for breast alone radiation therapy. For the breast + nodes and chest wall cohorts, common factors that predicted the use of hypofractionation were increasing age. In multivariable survival analysis, there was no difference between the fractionation regimens at 5 years. Estimated radiation therapy cost of this cohort approximated $52.1 million, compared with $38.5 million had these patients been treated with evidence-based fractionation. This demonstrated a potential saving of $13.6 million.

Conclusion

Hypofractionation appears underused for breast radiation therapy in NSW over time. This study highlights that evidence-based practice will translate to reduced health care treatment costs.

Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Is Effective for Patients With Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis

PURPOSE

This study evaluated long-term, population-based, breast cancer-specific outcomes in patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) to the breast/chest wall plus regional nodes using hypofractionated (HF) (40-42.5 Gy/16 fractions) versus conventionally fractionated (CF) regimens (50-50.4 Gy/25-28 fractions).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A prospective provincial database was used to identify patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer treated with curative-intent breast/chest wall + regional nodal RT from 1998 to 2010. The effect of RT fractionation on locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was assessed for the entire cohort and for high-risk subgroups: grade 3, ER-/HER2-, HER2+, and ≥4 positive nodes. Multivariable analysis and 2:1 case-match comparison of HF versus CF were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 5487 patients met the inclusion criteria (4006 HF and 1481 CF). Median age was 55 years, and median follow-up was 12.7 years. On multivariable analysis, no statistically significant differences were identified in 10-year LRRFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-1.27; P = .46), DRFS (HR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.06; P = .19), or BCSS (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.10; P = .36) between the HF and CF cohorts. There was no statistical difference in breast cancer-specific outcomes in the high-risk subgroups. On analysis of 2962 HF cases matched to 1481 CF controls, no statistical difference was observed in LRRFS (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.71-1.33; P = .87), DRFS (HR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.11; P = .68), or BCSS (HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.87-1.16; P = .92).

CONCLUSIONS

This large, population-based analysis with long-term follow-up after locoregional RT demonstrated that modest HF provides similar breast cancer-specific outcomes compared with CF. HF is an effective option for patients with stage I to III breast cancer receiving nodal RT.

Breast Radiation Therapy Under COVID-19 Pandemic Resource Constraints-Approaches to Defer or Shorten Treatment From a Comprehensive Cancer Center in the United States

Purpose

Breast radiation therapy accounts for a significant proportion of patient volume in contemporary radiation oncology practice. In the setting of anticipated resource constraints and widespread community infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic, measures for balancing both infectious and oncologic risk among patients and providers must be carefully considered. Here, we present evidence-based guidelines for omitting or abbreviating breast cancer radiation therapy, where appropriate, in an effort to mitigate risk to patients and optimize resource utilization.

Methods and Materials

Multidisciplinary breast cancer experts at a high-volume comprehensive cancer center convened contingency planning meetings over the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic to review the relevant literature and establish recommendations for the application of hypofractionated and abbreviated breast radiation regimens.

Results

Substantial evidence exists to support omitting radiation among certain favorable risk subgroups of patients with breast cancer and for abbreviating or accelerating regimens among others. For those who require either whole-breast or postmastectomy radiation, with or without coverage of the regional lymph nodes, a growing body of literature supports various hypofractionated approaches that appear safe and effective.

Conclusions

In the setting of a public health emergency with the potential to strain critical healthcare resources and place patients at risk of infection, the parsimonious application of breast radiation therapy may alleviate a significant clinical burden without compromising long-term oncologic outcomes. The judicious and personalized use of immature study data may be warranted in the setting of a competing mortality risk from this widespread pandemic.

Diagnosis and locoregional treatment of patients with breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic

We are facing a pandemic that is going to affect a significant part of the population. At the end of April in the world there are about 3,000,000 cases, with 205,000 deaths and 860,000 patients recovered.

The response to this pandemic has in many cases led to a significant change in the daily work of caring for cancer patients, the good results of which depend largely on time-adjusted protocols and multidisciplinary treatments.

We present a review of local, surgical and radiotherapy treatment together with authors’ recommendations made from personal experience on ways to act in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The multidisciplinary Breast Committees must continue to meet weekly in videoconference format. All surgical actions and irradiations must be carried out with maximum safety for both the patients and the participating teams. Hypofractionation in radiation therapy should be the standard treatment. Sometimes it is recommended to apply a primary systemic treatment or even a primary irradiation. Great coordination between the surgical and oncology teams, both medical and radiotherapeutic, is essential.

Hypofractionated radiation treatment for breast cancer: The time is now

While there is now Level I data with long-term follow-up supporting the routine use of hypofractionated (HF) whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) after breast-conserving surgery, its adoption has been slow and variable. This article will review the literature supporting the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiation for breast cancer, discuss the radiobiological rationale specific to breast tumors, and make an argument for justifying the routine adoption of shorter, HF-WBRT courses when delivering breast radiation. Data using HF with regional nodal irradiation and in the post-mastectomy setting will also be reviewed. The aim is to provide an in-depth understanding of the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer, its applicability, and topics warranting future research.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for elderly breast cancer patients: from early stages disease to local palliation for unresectable disease

There is a lack of clear guidelines on optimal radiotherapy dose regimen for elderly breast cancer patients. This review summarizes the current evidence on role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly breast cancer. Also, suggestions have been provided on the best fractionation approaches based on current evidence. Hypofractionated radiotherapy is feasible and well tolerated in elderly breast cancer patients with both early and locally advanced disease. Ultra-hypofractionated regimen seem appropriate for palliation of unresectable primary breast disease and could become a safe approach for adjuvant treatments. Hypofractionated radiotherapy should be considered for treatment of elderly breast cancer for curative intent, as well as for palliation.

Mechanical properties of the shoulder and pectoralis major in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with axillary surgery and radiotherapy

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy reduce breast cancer recurrence but can cause functional deficits in breast cancer survivors. A cross-sectional study quantified the long-term pathophysiological impact of these treatments on biomechanical measures of shoulder stiffness and ultrasound shear wave elastography measures of the shear elastic modulus of the pectoralis major (PM). Nine node-positive patients treated with radiotherapy to the breast and regional nodes after BCS and axillary lymph node dissection (Group 1) were compared to nine node-negative patients treated with radiotherapy to the breast alone after BCS and sentinel node biopsy (Group 2) and nine healthy age-matched controls. The mean follow-up for Group 1 and Group 2 patients was 988 days and 754 days, respectively. Shoulder stiffness did not differ between the treatment groups and healthy controls (p = 0.23). The PM shear elastic modulus differed between groups (p = 0.002), with Group 1 patients exhibiting a stiffer PM than Group 2 patients (p < 0.001) and healthy controls (p = 0.027). The mean prescribed radiotherapy dose to the PM was significantly correlated with passive shear elastic modulus (p = 0.018). Breast cancer patients undergoing more extensive axillary surgery and nodal radiotherapy did not experience long-term functional deficits to shoulder integrity but did experience long-term mechanical changes of the PM.

International comparison of cosmetic outcomes of breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy for women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

PURPOSE

To assess the cosmetic impact of breast conserving surgery (BCS), whole breast irradiation (WBI) fractionation and tumour bed boost (TBB) use in a phase III trial for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Baseline and 3-year cosmesis were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Cosmetic Rating System and digital images in a randomised trial of non-low risk DCIS treated with postoperative WBI +/- TBB. Baseline cosmesis was assessed for four geographic clusters of treating centres. Cosmetic failure was a global score of fair or poor. Cosmetic deterioration was a score change from excellent or good at baseline to fair or poor at three years. Odds ratios for cosmetic deterioration by WBI dose-fractionation and TBB use were calculated for both scoring systems.

RESULTS

1608 women were enrolled from 11 countries between 2007 and 2014. 85-90% had excellent or good baseline cosmesis independent of geography or assessment method. TBB (16 Gy in 8 fractions) was associated with a >2-fold risk of cosmetic deterioration (p < 0.001). Hypofractionated WBI (42.5 Gy in 16 fractions) achieved statistically similar 3-year cosmesis compared to conventional WBI (50 Gy in 25 fractions) (p ≥ 0.18). The adverse impact of a TBB was not significantly associated with WBI fractionation (interaction p ≥ 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Cosmetic failure from BCS was similar across international jurisdictions. A TBB of 16 Gy increased the rate of cosmetic deterioration. Hypofractionated WBI achieved similar 3-year cosmesis as conventional WBI in women treated with BCS for DCIS.

Hypofractionation Radiotherapy vs. Conventional Fractionation for Breast Cancer: A Comparative Review of Toxicity

The use of postoperative radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery was longstanding standard practice. The treatment protocol used a standard fractionation of 50 Gy in 25 fractions plus a boost. Recently, the hypofractionation approach has gained support based on Canadian and English studies that claimed equal tumor control and similar toxicity to the standard protocol.

We conducted a review of the literature of hypofractionation studies and compared the reported toxicity with the general literature. We placed special emphasis on breast fibrosis after hypofractionation versus standard fractionation. We found a striking difference in the breast toxicity reported by the hypofractionation literature regarding breast fibrosis as compared to standard fractionation. Breast fibrosis should be explored further via additional studies and discussed with potential breast-conserving surgery patients.