Reirradiation Using Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy: A Potentially Durable Technique for Salvaging Recurrent Pelvic Malignancies

The changing role for extended resections in an era of advanced radiotherapy techniques and novel therapies in gynaecological malignancy

Pelvic exenteration, first described in 1948 and subsequently refined, may be offered as a last hope of cure to patients with recurrent or locally advanced pelvic tumours, where radiotherapy is not an option. It is a complex, morbid, ultra-radical procedure involving en-bloc resection of the female reproductive organs, lower urinary tract, and a portion of the rectosigmoid. This article discusses the evolution of and current indications for pelvic exenteration in gynaecologic oncology as well as the reasons for its decline: primary and secondary prevention of cervical cancer (the recurrence of which is the most common indication for exenteration); improvements in treatment of cervical, endometrial, vaginal and vulvar cancer in the primary and recurrent setting; and the advent of novel therapies.

Image-guided interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy: A single institution experience

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of image-guided high-dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for the reirradiation of cervical cancer within a previously irradiated area.

Methods and materials

Twenty-three consecutive patients with cervical cancer were reirradiated with curative intent using brachytherapy (BT) with or without external beam irradiation. The median biologically equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) for reirradiation was 64.0 Gy (range: 31.3–95.1 Gy), and the median cumulative EQD2 (for primary treatment and reirradiation) was 152.4 Gy (range: 97.8–200.9 Gy). The average clinical target volume was 82.9 cm³ (range: 26.9–208.3 cm³), and the median treatment-free interval (TFI) was 13 months (range: 3–93 months).

Results

The median follow-up time was 19 months (range: 2–59 months). The complete response rate after reirradiation was 56.5%. The 1-, 2- 3-, and 4-year post-relapse survival (PRS) rates were 65.2%, 43.5%, 33.8%, and 27.1%, respectively. The median reirradiation EQD2 D2cc of rectum and bladder was 39.5 Gy (range = 14.6–96.2 Gy) and 52.1 Gy (range = 29.1–114.2 Gy). The median cumulative EQD2 D2cc of rectum and bladder was 115.0 Gy (range = 84.4–189.3 Gy) and 130.5 Gy (range = 95.5–173.5 Gy). During follow-up, nine (39.1%) patients had experienced grade 3 or 4 late toxicities. Grade ≥3 rectal toxicity occurred in three patients (13.0%). Grade ≥3 urinary toxicity occurred in five patients (21.7%). One patient (4.3%) had both grade ≥3 urinary and rectal toxicity. Tumor volume, TFI, tumor invasion organ number, and local control were significant prognostic factors adversely affecting OS.

Conclusions

For recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy, reirradiation of HDR-ISBT is feasible, even if the local tumor invasion is large, with a good chance of survival and acceptable side effects.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

Permanent Interstitial Cesium-131 Brachytherapy in Treating High-Risk Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study

Purpose/Objectives

To establish the feasibility and safety of intraoperative placement of cesium-131 (Cs-131) seeds for re-irradiation in recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC).

Methods

Patients with resectable recurrent HNC who were deemed to have a high risk of second recurrence were eligible. Immediately after tumor extirpation, seeds were implanted in the surgical bed based on the preoperative treatment plan with intraoperative adjustment. The surgical bed and the seeds were covered with a regional flap or microvascular free flap. A CT of the neck was obtained on postoperative day 1 for evaluation of the postoperative dose distribution. Patients were followed 1 and 3 months after surgery, then every 3 months in the first 2 years.

Results

From November 2016 to September 2018, 15 patients were recruited and 12 patients received treatment per protocol. For the patients who had implants, the sites of initial recurrence included 10 neck alone, 1 neck and larynx, and 1 neck/peristomal. The median follow-up was 21.4 months. After surgery, patients remained hospitalized for a median of 6 days. There were no high-grade toxicities except two patients with wound complications requiring wound care. Eight patients had recurrences, three locoregional alone, three distant alone, and two with both locoregional and distant recurrences. Only one patient had an in-field failure. Five patients died, with 1- and 2-year overall survival of 75 and 58%.

Conclusions

Cs-131 implant after surgical resection in recurrent HNC is feasible and safe. There were no unexpected severe toxicities. Most failures were out-of-field or distant.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02794675.

Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Salvage Reirradiation: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Local recurrence in gynecological malignancies occurring in a previously irradiated field is a difficult clinical issue. Curative-intent treatment is salvage surgery and is associated with non-negligible peri-operative morbidity and has a substantial impact on long-term quality of life. Reirradiation, using three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT), might be a suitable alternative, especially in non-operable patients. The aim of this review is to report outcomes and toxicities of reirradiation 3D-IGBT in this context. 3D-IGBT appears to be a feasible alternative to salvage surgery in inoperable patients, with an acceptable outcome for patients who have no other curative therapeutic options, however long-term toxicities were high in some studies. Each case should be referred to highly experienced expert centers.

Abstract

Background: Local recurrence in gynecological malignancies occurring in a previously irradiated field is a challenging clinical issue. The most frequent curative-intent treatment is salvage surgery. Reirradiation, using three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT), might be a suitable alternative. We reviewed recent literature concerning 3D-IGBT for reirradiation in the context of local recurrences from gynecological malignancies. Methods: We conducted a large-scale literature research, and 15 original studies, responding to our research criteria, were finally selected. Results: Local control rates ranged from 44% to 71.4% at 2–5 years, and overall survival rates ranged from 39.5% to 78% at 2–5 years. Grade ≥3 toxicities ranged from 1.7% to 50%, with only one study reporting a grade 5 event. Results in terms of outcome and toxicities were highly variable depending on studies. Several studies suggested that local control could be improved with 2 Gy equivalent doses >40 Gy. Conclusion: IGBT appears to be a feasible alternative to salvage surgery in inoperable patients or patients refusing surgery, with an acceptable outcome for patients who have no other curative therapeutic options, however at a high cost of long-term grade ≥3 toxicities in some studies. We recommend that patients with local recurrence from gynecologic neoplasm occurring in previously irradiated fields should be referred to highly experienced expert centers. Centralization of data and large-scale multicentric international prospective trials are warranted. Efforts should be made to improve local control while limiting the risk of toxicities.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multi-disciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.

American Brachytherapy Society working group report on the patterns of care and a literature review of reirradiation for gynecologic cancers

PURPOSE

Recurrences of previously irradiated gynecological malignancies are uncommon. Standardized management of these cases is not well established. We aim to provide an in-depth literature review and present current practice patterns among an international group of experienced practitioners in the reirradiation setting of gynecologic cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An extensive literature search was performed and 35 articles were selected based on preset criteria. A 20-question online survey of 10 experts regarding their retreatment practices was also conducted.

RESULTS

The reviewed publications include a diverse group of patients, multiple treatment techniques, a range of total doses, local control, overall survival, and toxicity outcomes. Overall, local control ranged from 44% to 88% over 1-5 years with OS in the range of 39.5-82% at 2-5 years. Late G3-4 toxicity varied very broadly from 0% to 42.9%, with most papers reporting serious toxicities greater than 15%. The most common reirradiation technique utilized was brachytherapy. Some low-dose-rate data suggest improved outcomes with doses >50 Gy. The high-dose-rate data are more varied with some studies suggesting improved local control with doses >40 Gy. In general, a longer time interval between the first and second course of radiation as well as recurrences <2-4 cm tend to have improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Reirradiation with brachytherapy results in relatively reasonable local control and toxicities for women with recurrent gynecologic cancers. The appropriate dose for each case needs to be individualized given the heterogeneity of cases. Multidisciplinary management is critical to develop individualized plans and to clearly communicate potential side effects and expected treatment outcomes.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Reirradiation with brachytherapy is an acceptable effective organ preserving approach for recurrent gynecologic cancers with a reasonable local control and toxicity profile. Each case requires multidisciplinary management to develop an individualized approach. Monitoring for potential long-term toxicities is essential.

Outcomes after definitive re-irradiation with 3D brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Limited outcome data exists on salvage re-irradiation for vaginal relapse of previously-irradiated endometrial cancer. We report our 10-year experience with management of vaginal recurrence using definitive intent re-irradiation brachytherapy with or without EBRT.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on 22 patients treated with definitive-intent re-irradiation brachytherapy ± EBRT for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. The cumulative rectosigmoid and bladder D2cc (EQD2) were limited to <75 Gy and <90 Gy, respectively. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to estimate survival. Severe (grade 3 or higher) radiation-related toxicities, defined according to CTCAE v4, were recorded.

RESULTS

Prior radiation therapy consisted of vaginal brachytherapy (54.5%), pelvic EBRT (22.7%), or combination pelvic EBRT and brachytherapy (22.7%). Median re-irradiation interval was 26.6 months. Salvage re-irradiation consisted of EBRT with brachytherapy in 50.0% and brachytherapy alone in 50.0%. Median HR-CTV D90 (EQD2) was 64.5 Gy (IQR: 49.6-75.8). Median cumulative D2cc for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 72.1 Gy (range: 30.3-81.8), 70.6 Gy (range: 32.0-80.5), and 52.7 Gy (range: 29.6-75.3), respectively. At a median follow-up of 27.6 months, 3-year local control, regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 65.8%, 76.6%, 40.8%, and 68.1%, respectively. There were no grade ≥ 3 acute or late rectosigmoid or bladder toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Re-irradiation with 3D conformal brachytherapy for vaginal recurrence is feasible and safe as long as cumulative dose to surrounding normal organs is limited, and offers a chance to potentially salvage 40% of patients presenting with vaginal recurrence in the setting of prior pelvic radiation.

Second Re-irradiation: Clinical Examples of Worthwhile Treatment

INTRODUCTION

 Improved treatment approaches have resulted in longer survival of patients with certain types of incurable cancer, without eliminating the need for symptom palliation and supportive measures. In this context, re-irradiation is an increasingly important option. Little data exists about a second or repeat re-irradiation.

METHODS

From a single institution database, patients who received a second re-irradiation with cumulative equivalent doses (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) for late effects, alpha/beta-value 3 Gy) of more than 90 Gy and survived for more than six months were identified. Illustrative clinical examples were provided.

RESULTS

The examples describe the treatment of sacral bone metastases, recurrent rectal cancer, and pelvic lymph node metastases. The maximum cumulative EQD2 was 142 Gy. Symptomatic responses were obtained without clinically relevant side effects.

CONCLUSION

 These three cases illustrate that a second re-irradiation has the potential to provide worthwhile palliative effects without causing overt late toxicity during the remaining life time. In patients who tolerated previous radiotherapy well, further re-irradiation may contribute to the ever-increasing armamentarium of options that increase the survival of patients with incurable cancer and try to prolong the time period where independent living is possible.

Second re-irradiation: a narrative review of the available clinical data

BACKGROUND

Considerable controversy exists about the safety and efficacy of second re-irradiations (three courses of radiotherapy to overlapping volumes). Therefore, all published clinical studies were reviewed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Contemporary and historical articles were identified. Outcomes such as survival, local control, symptom improvement and side effects were extracted. Contemporary results were grouped by anatomical location of the re-irradiated region in the body.

RESULTS

Most data were derived from central nervous system tumors, pelvic tumors and bone metastases. We could include nine contemporary, retrospective studies with 2-25 patients each. Nearly, all patients were treated with palliative intent. Most of the prescribed re-irradiation regimens were highly individualized and thus difficult to compare. Symptomatic responses were recorded in most patients. In palliatively treated patients with pelvic and bony target volumes, high-grade toxicity was uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite of issues related to study size, length of follow-up and calculation of lifetime cumulative equivalent dose, the available data provide an initial framework for future studies and discussion of dose constraints. Selected dose-fractionation regimens may result in a satisfactory therapeutic ratio even after two previous courses of radiotherapy, if these were well tolerated.