1
|
Courtney PT, Valle LF, Raldow AC, Steinberg ML. MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy-An Emerging and Disruptive Process of Care: Healthcare Economic and Policy Considerations. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:4-13. [PMID: 38105092 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) is an emerging, innovative technology that provides opportunities to transform and improve the current clinical care process in radiation oncology. As with many new technologies in radiation oncology, careful evaluation from a healthcare economic and policy perspective is required for its successful implementation. In this review article, we describe the current evidence surrounding MRgRT, framing it within the context of value within the healthcare system. Additionally, we highlight areas in which MRgRT may disrupt the current process of care, and discuss the evidence thresholds and timeline required for the widespread adoption of this promising technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Travis Courtney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Luca F Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ann C Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jassar H, Tai A, Chen X, Keiper TD, Paulson E, Lathuilière F, Bériault S, Hébert F, Savard L, Cooper DT, Cloake S, Li XA. Real-time motion monitoring using orthogonal cine MRI during MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy for abdominal tumors on 1.5T MR-Linac. Med Phys 2023; 50:3103-3116. [PMID: 36893292 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-time motion monitoring (RTMM) is necessary for accurate motion management of intrafraction motions during radiation therapy (RT). PURPOSE Building upon a previous study, this work develops and tests an improved RTMM technique based on real-time orthogonal cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquired during magnetic resonance-guided adaptive RT (MRgART) for abdominal tumors on MR-Linac. METHODS A motion monitoring research package (MMRP) was developed and tested for RTMM based on template rigid registration between beam-on real-time orthogonal cine MRI and pre-beam daily reference 3D-MRI (baseline). The MRI data acquired under free-breathing during the routine MRgART on a 1.5T MR-Linac for 18 patients with abdominal malignancies of 8 liver, 4 adrenal glands (renal fossa), and 6 pancreas cases were used to evaluate the MMRP package. For each patient, a 3D mid-position image derived from an in-house daily 4D-MRI was used to define a target mask or a surrogate sub-region encompassing the target. Additionally, an exploratory case reviewed for an MRI dataset of a healthy volunteer acquired under both free-breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) was used to test how effectively the RTMM using the MMRP can address through-plane motion (TPM). For all cases, the 2D T2/T1-weighted cine MRIs were captured with a temporal resolution of 200 ms interleaved between coronal and sagittal orientations. Manually delineated contours on the cine frames were used as the ground-truth motion. Common visible vessels and segments of target boundaries in proximity to the target were used as anatomical landmarks for reproducible delineations on both the 3D and the cine MRI images. Standard deviation of the error (SDE) between the ground-truth and the measured target motion from the MMRP package were analyzed to evaluate the RTMM accuracy. The maximum target motion (MTM) was measured on the 4D-MRI for all cases during free-breathing. RESULTS The mean (range) centroid motions for the 13 abdominal tumor cases were 7.69 (4.71-11.15), 1.73 (0.81-3.05), and 2.71 (1.45-3.93) mm with an overall accuracy of <2 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), the left-right (LR), and the anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively. The mean (range) of the MTM from the 4D-MRI was 7.38 (2-11) mm in the SI direction, smaller than the monitored motion of centroid, demonstrating the importance of the real-time motion capture. For the remaining patient cases, the ground-truth delineation was challenging under free-breathing due to the target deformation and the large TPM in the AP direction, the implant-induced image artifacts, and/or the suboptimal image plane selection. These cases were evaluated based on visual assessment. For the healthy volunteer, the TPM of the target was significant under free-breathing which degraded the RTMM accuracy. RTMM accuracy of <2 mm was achieved under DIBH, indicating DIBH is an effective method to address large TPM. CONCLUSIONS We have successfully developed and tested the use of a template-based registration method for an accurate RTMM of abdominal targets during MRgART on a 1.5T MR-Linac without using injected contrast agents or radio-opaque implants. DIBH may be used to effectively reduce or eliminate TPM of abdominal targets during RTMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Jassar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - An Tai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Xinfeng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Timothy D Keiper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Eric Paulson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Charters JA, Abdulkadir Y, O'Connell D, Yang Y, Lamb JM. Dosimetric evaluation of respiratory gating on a 0.35-T magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13666. [PMID: 35950272 PMCID: PMC9815517 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The commercial 0.35-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy vendor ViewRay recently introduced upgraded real-time imaging frame rates based on compressed sensing techniques. Furthermore, additional motion tracking algorithms were made available. Compressed sensing allows for increased image frame rates but may compromise image quality. To assess the impact of this upgrade on respiratory gating accuracy, we evaluated gated dose distributions pre- and post-upgrade using a motion phantom and radiochromic film. METHODS Seven motion waveforms (four artificial, two patient-derived free-breathing, and one breath-holding) were used to drive an MRI-compatible motion phantom. A treatment plan was developed to deliver a 3-cm diameter spherical dose distribution typical of a stereotactic body radiotherapy plan. Gating was performed using 4-frames per second (fps) imaging pre-upgrade on the "default" tracking algorithm and 8-fps post-upgrade using the "small mobile targets" (SMT) and "large deforming targets" (LDT) tracking algorithms. Radiochromic film was placed in a moving insert within the phantom to measure dose. The planned and delivered dose distributions were compared using the gamma index with 3%/3-mm criteria. Dose-area histograms were produced to calculate the dose to 95% (D95) of the sphere planning target volume (PTV) and two simulated gross tumor volumes formed by contracting the PTV by 3 and 5 mm, respectively. RESULTS Gamma pass rates ranged from 18% to 93% over the 21 combinations of breathing trace and gating conditions examined. D95 ranged from 206 to 514 cGy. On average, the LDT algorithm yielded lower gamma and D95 values than the default and SMT algorithms. CONCLUSION Respiratory gating at 8 fps with the new tracking algorithms provides similar gating performance to the original algorithm with 4 fps, although the LDT algorithm had lower accuracy for our non-deformable target. This indicates that the choice of deformable image registration algorithm should be chosen deliberately based on whether the target is rigid or deforming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A. Charters
- Department of Radiation OncologyDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yasin Abdulkadir
- Department of Radiation OncologyDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Dylan O'Connell
- Department of Radiation OncologyDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiation OncologyDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - James M. Lamb
- Department of Radiation OncologyDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ginn JS, Low DA, Lamb JM, Ruan D. A motion prediction confidence estimation framework for prediction-based radiotherapy gating. Med Phys 2020; 47:3297-3304. [PMID: 32415857 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Motion prediction can compensate for latency in image-guided radiotherapy and has been an active area of research. However, motion predictions are subject to error and variations. We have developed and evaluated a novel motion prediction confidence estimation framework to improve the efficacy and robustness of prediction-based radiotherapy gating decision-making. The specific scenario of adaptive gating in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy is studied as an example, but the method generalizes to other modalities and motion management setups. METHODS The proposed prediction confidence estimator is based on a generic training/testing paradigm and consists of a weighted combination of three components: the prediction model's goodness of fit, variation in the prediction using a leave-one-out process and the velocity of the tracked target. Roughly, these terms quantify respectively the consistency between prediction and the training data, the robustness of model inference, and the stability due to target speed. The weight parameters and the action level in triggering beam-off decision are optimized. The method is assessed and validated in 8 healthy volunteer and 13 patient studies using a 0.35T MRI-guided radiotherapy system predicting 0.25-0.33 s ahead. The effect of the action level on the predicted gating decision accuracy, beam-on positive predictive value (PPV) and median distance between the predicted and ground-truth target centroids were evaluated. Statistical significance was evaluated using a paired t-test. The tradeoff between these performance metrics and gating duty cycle was assessed. RESULTS Use of the confidence estimator threshold increased gating accuracy by up to 2.42%, increased PPV by up to 3.00%, and reduced the median centroid distance up to 0.28 mm. The confidence estimator threshold on average increased gating accuracy to 96.5% (P = 2.08 × 10-4 ), increased PPV to 96.7% (P = 1.46 × 10-5 ), reduced the median centroid distance to 0.54 mm (P = 1.71 × 10-5 ) at the cost of reducing the gating duty cycle by 14.3% to 48.5%. Hyperparameter tuning revealed that contrary to intuition, the velocity term offered only minimal performance improvement in some cases but also introduced potential stability issues. The combination of goodness of fit and leave-one-out prediction variation provided the most effective confidence estimator, yielding universally better performance in gating decisions. CONCLUSION Confidence estimation utilizing prediction model fitness criterion and validation principles can complement prediction methods to guide MRI-guided radiotherapy gating. Results from both volunteer and patient studies showed improved gating quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Ginn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ginn JS, Ruan D, Low DA, Lamb JM. An image regression motion prediction technique for MRI-guided radiotherapy evaluated in single-plane cine imaging. Med Phys 2019; 47:404-413. [PMID: 31808161 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and evaluate a novel motion prediction method for magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided radiotherapy applications. This method, which we deem "image regression," predicts future tissue motion based on a weighted combination of previously observed motion states. Motion predictions are derived from a sliding window of recent motion states which are defined by a temporal sequence of images. A key advantage of this method compared to other motion prediction methods is that its computational complexity scales weekly with the number of spatial points predicted. Applications of gating latency reduction and improvement in deformable registration-based target tracking are demonstrated. METHODS The image regression (IR) motion prediction method was developed and evaluated using 26.9 h of real-time imaging acquired from eight healthy volunteers and 13 patients using a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system. Motion predictions were performed 0.25-0.33 s into the future using a weighted sum of previously observed motion states with image similarity-derived weights. The set of previously observed motion states were continuously updated to incorporate the changes in breathing patterns. The accuracy of the predicted radiotherapy gating decision, beam-on positive predictive value (PPV), and predicted vs ground-truth target centroid position errors are reported. The IR technique was compared against no prediction, linear extrapolation, and an established autoregressive linear prediction algorithm. The usage of IR to initialize the deformable registration and enhance the target tracking was demonstrated in the healthy volunteer studies. Deformable registration with IR initialization was compared to the initialization performed by current clinical software: no initialization, previous image registration initialization and linear motion extrapolation initialization. RESULTS The average IR-predicted radiation beam gating decision accuracy was 95.8%, with a PPV of 95.7%, and median and 95th percentile centroid position errors of 0.63 and 2.08 mm, respectively. Compared to the autoregressive linear prediction method, gating accuracy was 1.15% greater, PPV was 1.61% greater, and median and 95th percentile centroid distances were 0.21 and 0.23 mm smaller. The IR-initialized registration on average converged within 0.50 mm of the ground-truth position in fewer than 10 iterations whereas the next best initialization method required more than 25 iterations. CONCLUSIONS Image regression motion prediction has the potential to reduce the gating latencies and improve the speed and accuracy of deformable registration-based target tracking in MRI-guided radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Ginn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Knowles BR, Friedrich F, Fischer C, Paech D, Ladd ME. Beyond T2 and 3T: New MRI techniques for clinicians. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 18:87-97. [PMID: 31341982 PMCID: PMC6630188 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Technological advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in terms of field strength and hybrid MR systems have led to improvements in tumor imaging in terms of anatomy and functionality. This review paper discusses the applications of such advances in the field of radiation oncology with regards to treatment planning, therapy guidance and monitoring tumor response and predicting outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin R. Knowles
- Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Friedrich
- Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carola Fischer
- Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Paech
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark E. Ladd
- Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ginn JS, Ruan D, Low DA, Lamb JM. Multislice motion modeling for MRI-guided radiotherapy gating. Med Phys 2019; 46:465-474. [PMID: 30570755 PMCID: PMC6370044 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE On-board magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) greatly enhances real-time target tracking capability during radiotherapy treatments. However, multislice and volumetric MRI techniques are frame rate limited and introduce unacceptable latency between the target moving out of position and the beam being turned off. We present a technique to estimate continuous volumetric tissue motion using motion models built from a repeated acquisition of a stack of MR slices. Applications including multislice target visualization and out-of-slice motion estimation during MRI-guided radiotherapy are demonstrated. METHODS Eight healthy volunteer studies were performed using a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system. Images were acquired at three frames per second in an interleaved fashion across ten adjacent sagittal slice positions covering 4.5 cm using a balanced steady-state-free precession sequence. A previously published five-dimensional (5D) linear motion model used for MRI-guided radiotherapy gating was extended to include multiple slices. This model utilizes an external respiratory bellows signal recorded during imaging to simultaneously estimate motion across all imaged slices. For comparison to an image-based approach, the manifold learning technique local linear embedding (LLE) was used to derive a respiratory surrogate for motion modeling. Manifolds for every slice were aligned during LLE in a group-wise fashion, enabling motion estimation outside the current imaged slice using a motion model, a process which we denote as mSGA. Additionally, a method is developed to evaluate out-of-slice motion estimates. The multislice motion model was evaluated in a single slice with each newly acquired image using a leave-one-out approach. Model-generated gating decision accuracy and beam-on positive predictive value (PPV) are reported along with the median and 95th percentile distance between model and ground truth target centroids. RESULTS The average model gating decision accuracy and PPV across all volunteer studies was 93.7% and 92.8% using the 5D model, and 96.8% and 96.1% using the mSGA model, respectively. The median and 95th percentile distance between model and ground truth target centroids was 0.91 and 2.90 mm, respectively, using the 5D model and 0.58 and 1.49 mm using the mSGA model, averaged over all eight subjects. The mSGA motion model provided a statistically significant improvement across all evaluation metrics compared to the external surrogate-based 5D model. CONCLUSION The proposed techniques for out-of-slice target motion estimation demonstrated accuracy likely sufficient for clinical use. Results indicate the mSGA model may provide higher accuracy, however, the external surrogate-based model allows for unbiased in vivo accuracy evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S. Ginn
- Department of Radiation OncologyDavid Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation OncologyDavid Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Daniel A. Low
- Department of Radiation OncologyDavid Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - James M. Lamb
- Department of Radiation OncologyDavid Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| |
Collapse
|