1
|
Wang Z, Li L, Wu Y, Liu Z, Wu R, Wang J, Zhang J, Chen X, Qu Y, Wang K, Huang X, Luo J, Zhang Y, Yi J. Development and validation of Prediction models for radiation-induced hypoglossal neuropathy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2025; 207:110887. [PMID: 40209855 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2025] [Revised: 03/31/2025] [Accepted: 04/07/2025] [Indexed: 04/12/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To establish predictive models for radiation-induced hypoglossal neuropathy (RIHN) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 423 NPC patients receiving IMRT-based treatment were retrospectively reviewed. They were randomly (3:2) divided into a training set (n = 256) and a testing set (n = 167). Dosimetric variables were selected by penalized regression and machine learning, with area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) calculated. Clinical variables were selected by the competitive risk analysis. A competitive risk model including clinical and dosimetric variables was performed, and a nomogram was generated as a visualization of the model to predict the incidence of RIHN. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 102 months (IQR: 89.5 to 112.9 months), the cumulative incidence of RIHN at 3, 5, and 8 years were 2.1 %, 5.4 %, and 10.5 %, respectively. D1cc and aV75 were the most predictive dosimetric variables. The dose-effect curve plotted with D1cc indicated the tolerance dose for a 5 % probability of developing RIHN in 8 years (TD5/8) was 77.3 Gy (EQD2). The restricted cubic spline between aV75 and RIHN indicated a volume threshold of 0.81 cm3. A competitive risk model including hypoglossal canal involvement, concurrent chemotherapy, D1cc, and aV75 was established, with the C-index of the training set and testing set being 0.726 and 0.691, respectively. The nomogram-defined high-risk group had the higher RIHN incidences in the training and testing sets. CONCLUSIONS This study identified the most critical dosimetric predictors, which is expected to become a feasible dose constraint for hypoglossal nerves in radiation plan. Combining dosimetric and clinical predictors, we further proposed and validated the first nomogram model to quantify the risk of RIHN, contributing to identifying high-risk patients and early intervention. Further multicenter studies are needed to validate or complement our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zekun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yunpeng Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhiqiang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Runye Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jingbo Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jianghu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xuesong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yuan Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xiaodong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jingwei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
| | - Junlin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lauwens L, Ribeiro MF, Zegers CML, Høyer M, Alapetite C, Blomstrand M, Calugaru V, Perri DD, Iannalfi A, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Paulsen F, Postma AA, Romero AM, Timmermann B, Troost EGC, van der Weide HL, Whitfield GA, Harrabi S, Lambrecht M, Eekers DBP. Systematic review of MRI alterations in the brain following proton and photon radiation therapy: Towards a uniform European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) definition. Radiother Oncol 2025; 208:110936. [PMID: 40360047 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2025] [Revised: 04/30/2025] [Accepted: 05/01/2025] [Indexed: 05/15/2025]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often demonstrates alterations following cranial radiotherapy (RT), which may result in clinical symptoms and diagnostic uncertainty, and thus potentially impact treatment decisions. The potential differences in MRI alterations after proton and photon RT, has raised concerns regarding the relative biological effectiveness of proton therapy. To provide an overview of MRI alterations in the brain post-RT and to explore differences between photon and proton RT, a systematic review adhering to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted, focusing on the assessment methods and definitions across studies. A systematic search of three electronic databases was performed using the concepts 'normo-fractionated radiotherapy ', 'MRI alterations' and 'brain, skull base or head and neck tumours in adult and paediatric populations'. Data extraction and quality assessment was performed on articles meeting the predefined criteria by two independent reviewers. Out of 5887 screened studies, 94 met the inclusion criteria. These studies were categorized based on confinement of the MRI alterations to temporal lobe, brainstem, or across the entire brain. Additional subclassification was performed based on MRI sequences evaluated or by the nature of the alterations, with pseudoprogression generally reserved for glioma patients. While many papers exist on MRI alterations in the brain after RT, this review highlights significant inconsistencies in the terminology and definitions, limiting the comparability of findings across studies. Our results highlight the need for and facilitate the development of a standardized framework for describing MRI alterations after RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieselotte Lauwens
- KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Marvin F Ribeiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht. University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Mental Health and Neuroscience research institute (Mhens) Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Catharina M L Zegers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht. University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Morton Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Claire Alapetite
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris & Proton Center, Orsay, France
| | - Malin Blomstrand
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg and the Skandion Clinic, Sweden
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris & Proton Center, Orsay, France
| | - Dario Di Perri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversitary Center Leuven (PartICLe), Belgium
| | - Alberto Iannalfi
- Clinical Department, Radiotherapy Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (C.N.A.O.), Italy
| | - Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Radioonkologie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Clinic for Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Alida A Postma
- Mental Health and Neuroscience research institute (Mhens) Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Alejandra Méndèz Romero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Hiska L van der Weide
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gillian A Whitfield
- The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, The Children's Brain Tumour Research Network, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversitary Center Leuven (PartICLe), Belgium
| | - Daniëlle B P Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht. University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen S, Huang L, Chu Y, Lian J, Shao H, Wang T, Zou X, Huang H. Noninvasive diagnosis model for predicting significant liver inflammation in patients with chronic hepatitis B in the immune-tolerant phase. Sci Rep 2025; 15:3031. [PMID: 39856182 PMCID: PMC11760383 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87756-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
The presence of significant liver inflammation is an important indication for antiviral therapy in immune-tolerant (IT)phase with chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients. This study aims to establish a non-invasive model to assess significant liver inflammation in the IT-phase of CHB patients. This multicenter retrospective study included a total of 535 IT-phase CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy, and were randomly divided into a training and a validation set. In the training cohort, the relevant indices were initially screened using univariate analysis. Then the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify the significant independent risk factors and establish a predictive model. A diagnostic nomogram was constructed. Calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. In this study, 37.0% of the patients exhibited significant liver inflammation. Baseline characteristics revealed a median age of 35.0 years, with males accounting for 51.7% of the cohort. Age, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Prothrombin (PT), Albumin (ALB) and Hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) were identified as independent predictors of significant liver inflammation in the immune-tolerant phase, and a nomogram was constructed based on these indicators. The predictive model demonstrated good calibration and discrimination in both the training set and the validation set (aera under the curve (AUC) of 0.741 and 0.740, respectively). The nomogram can accurately identify significant liver inflammation in immune-tolerant phase CHB patients and facilitate the early initiation of antiviral therapy, thereby reducing the need for clinical liver biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Chen
- Emergency and Critical Care Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lu Huang
- Center for General Practice Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yili Chu
- Center for General Practice Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiangshan Lian
- State Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Hui Shao
- Department of Infection, Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, China
| | - Tingting Wang
- Center for General Practice Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xuehan Zou
- Center for General Practice Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Haijun Huang
- Center for General Practice Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
- , No. 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leung HWC, Wang SY, Lin CL, Chan ALF. Radiation Dose-Induced Carotid Artery Stenosis and Brain Necrosis in Head and Neck Cancer-A Real World Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2982. [PMID: 39272840 PMCID: PMC11394158 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to examine whether radiation therapy doses are related to incidences of carotid artery stenosis and brain necrosis in a large-scale real-world database. Methods: We identified a cohort of HNC patients from the catastrophic illness patient dataset using ICD-9 or ICD-10 to compare the incidence and risks of carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and brain necrosis (RIBN) in patients who received a radiation therapy dose of ≥5400 cGy/30 fractions (group A) with those who received a radiation therapy dose of <5400 cGy/30 fractions (group B). The incidence and hazard ratios were quantified using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 19,964 patients were identified in group A and group B. Among them, 965 and 863 cases of CAS and 435 and 359 cases of RIBN were identified in group A and group B, respectively. There was no statistically significant association between the two groups for CAS risk, whereas there was a statistically significant association between the two groups for RIBN risk. The most common primary site of head and neck cancers was the nasopharynx (1144 of 19,964, 5.73%). Conclusions: Our study suggests that RT may increase the risk of carotid stenosis and brain necrosis in patients with NPC. To ensure patient safety during treatment, the optimal balance between tumor control and toxicity prevention in individual patients through minimization of the radiation dose to all relevant OARs must be properly understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry W C Leung
- An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan 709, Taiwan
| | - Shyh-Yau Wang
- An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan 709, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Li Lin
- College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Agnes L F Chan
- Kaohsiung Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 821, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chow JCH, Ho JCS, Cheung KM, Johnson D, Ip BYM, Beitler JJ, Strojan P, Mäkitie AA, Eisbruch A, Ng SP, Nuyts S, Mendenhall WM, Babighian S, Ferlito A. Neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110200. [PMID: 38438018 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the mainstay treatment modalities for the management of non-metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC). Notable improvements in treatment outcomes have been observed in the recent decades. Modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and charged particle therapy, have significantly improved tumor target conformity and enabled better preservation of normal structures. However, because of the intricate anatomy of the head and neck region, multiple critical neurological structures such as the brain, brainstem, spinal cord, cranial nerves, nerve plexuses, autonomic pathways, brain vasculature, and neurosensory organs, are variably irradiated during treatment, particularly when tumor targets are in close proximity. Consequently, a diverse spectrum of late neurological sequelae may manifest in HNC survivors. These neurological complications commonly result in irreversible symptoms, impair patients' quality of life, and contribute to a substantial proportion of non-cancer deaths. Although the relationship between radiation dose and toxicity has not been fully elucidated for all complications, appropriate application of dosimetric constraints during radiotherapy planning may reduce their incidence. Vigilant surveillance during the course of survivorship also enables early detection and intervention. This article endeavors to provide a comprehensive review of the various neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for HNC, summarize the current incidence data, discuss methods to minimize their risks during radiotherapy planning, and highlight potential strategies for managing these debilitating toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C H Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| | - Jason C S Ho
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Ka Man Cheung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - David Johnson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Bonaventure Y M Ip
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Jonathan J Beitler
- Harold Alfond Center for Cancer Care, Maine General Hospital, Augusta, ME, USA
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Antti A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Silvia Babighian
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ospedale Sant'Antonio, Azienda Ospedaliera, Padova, Italy
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Teo PT, Rogacki K, Gopalakrishnan M, Das IJ, Abazeed ME, Mittal BB, Gentile M. Determining risk and predictors of head and neck cancer treatment-related lymphedema: A clinicopathologic and dosimetric data mining approach using interpretable machine learning and ensemble feature selection. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100747. [PMID: 38450218 PMCID: PMC10915511 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The ability to determine the risk and predictors of lymphedema is vital in improving the quality of life for head and neck (HN) cancer patients. However, selecting robust features is challenging due to the multicollinearity and high dimensionality of radiotherapy (RT) data. This study aims to overcome these challenges using an ensemble feature selection technique with machine learning (ML). Materials and methods Thirty organs-at-risk, including bilateral cervical lymph node levels, were contoured, and dose-volume data were extracted from 76 HN treatment plans. Clinicopathologic data was collected. Ensemble feature selection was used to reduce the number of features. Using the reduced features as input to ML and competing risk models, internal and external lymphedema prediction capability was evaluated with the ML models, and time to lymphedema event and risk stratification were estimated using the risk models. Results Two ML models, XGBoost and random forest, exhibited robust prediction performance. They achieved average F1-scores and AUCs of 84 ± 3.3 % and 79 ± 11.9 % (external lymphedema), and 64 ± 12 % and 78 ± 7.9 % (internal lymphedema). Predictive ML and risk models identified common predictors, including bulky node involvement, high dose to various lymph node levels, and lymph nodes removed during surgery. At 180 days, removing 0-25, 26-50, and > 50 lymph nodes increased external lymphedema risk to 72.1 %, 95.6 %, and 57.7 % respectively (p = 0.01). Conclusion Our approach, involving the reduction of HN RT data dimensionality, resulted in effective ML models for HN lymphedema prediction. Predictive dosimetric features emerged from both predictive and competing risk models. Consistency with clinicopathologic features from other studies supports our methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Troy Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 E. Huron St, Galter Pavilion LC-178, IL 60611. Chicago, United States
| | - Kevin Rogacki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 E. Huron St, Galter Pavilion LC-178, IL 60611. Chicago, United States
| | - Mahesh Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 E. Huron St, Galter Pavilion LC-178, IL 60611. Chicago, United States
| | - Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 E. Huron St, Galter Pavilion LC-178, IL 60611. Chicago, United States
| | - Mohamed E Abazeed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 E. Huron St, Galter Pavilion LC-178, IL 60611. Chicago, United States
| | - Bharat B Mittal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 E. Huron St, Galter Pavilion LC-178, IL 60611. Chicago, United States
| | - Michelle Gentile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, 800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
He C, Guo L, Zheng M, Peng H, Zhang X, Fan C, Zhao X, Gong P, Deng Z, Xu G, Chen C. Electrophysiological Changes on Laryngeal Motor Neuropathways Cause Voice Disorders for Postradiotherapy Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. J Voice 2024:S0892-1997(24)00115-2. [PMID: 38631941 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.03.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored electrophysiological changes in the laryngeal motor neuropathway and determined whether lesions in the laryngeal motor cortex (LMC) and its descending tract contribute to voice deterioration and peripheral nerve palsy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) postradiotherapy (RT). STUDY DESIGNS Prospective cohort study. METHODS Twenty-two patients with NPC at 2 to 4years post-RT (8 female and 14 male), 22 patients with NPC at 8 to 10years post-RT (8 female and 14 male), and 22 healthy individuals (9 female and 13 male) were selected to test their magnetic evoked potentials (MEP), motor nerve conduction, and voice quality using transcranial magnetic stimulation, laryngeal electromyography, and the XION DiVAS acoustic analysis software. Three groups were matched according to approximate age. Multiple comparisons were performed among the three groups. RESULTS The voice quality of post-RT patients with NPC deteriorated compared to that of healthy individuals. Bilateral LMC and their corticonuclear tracts to the bilateral ambiguous nuclei of post-RT patients with NPC were impaired according to multigroup comparisons of MEP amplitudes, latencies, and resting motor thresholds. The vagus and recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN) of post-RT patients with NPC were impaired according to multigroup comparisons of the amplitude and latencies of the compound muscle action potential and latencies of f-waves. CONCLUSIONS The voice quality of patients with NPC deteriorated after RT. The pathogenesis of post-RT voice deterioration may involve radiation-induced injuries to the vagus, RLN, and bilateral LMC. Furthermore, radiation-induced injuries to the bilateral LMC may contribute to vagus and RLN palsies. These findings support the use of transcranial approaches to treating voice disorders and peripheral nerve palsies in post-RT patients with NPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR2100054425; Electrophysiological Study of Vocal-Fold Mobility Disorders After Radiotherapy for NPC Patients via Magnetic Evoked Potential and Their Correlation with Voice Quality Assessment; https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=144429.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cui He
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Libing Guo
- Department of Oncology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Mingfen Zheng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hong Peng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Xuhui Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Changhe Fan
- Department of Psychiatry, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiangdong Zhao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Pinggui Gong
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zeyi Deng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Guang Xu
- Department of Neurology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Cuijie Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen Y, Zhang Q, Lu T, Hu C, Zong J, Xu Y, Zheng W, Chen L, Lin S, Qiu S, Xu L, Pan J, Guo Q, Lin S. Prioritizing sufficient dose to gross tumor volume over normal tissue sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment of T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 2023; 45:1130-1140. [PMID: 36856128 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), priority is often given minimize dose to the critical organs at risk (OARs) to avoid potential morbid sequelae. However, in T4 NPC, dosimetric inadequacy enforced by dose constraints on OARs may significantly impact tumor control. METHODS This was a single-institute cohort that patients diagnosed between July 2005 and December 2010 with T4 NPC treated with IMRT. All patients were re-classification according to the 7th-AJCC stage. RESULTS Overall, the average doses such as Dmax , D1% , D2% and D1cc for various Central nervous system (CNS) OARs including brainstem, optic nerve, chiasm, temporal lobes and spinal cord were found to exceed published guidelines as RTOG0225. However, no clinical toxicities were seen during the follow-up period except for 13% patients with temporal lobe necrosis. CONCLUSION Our retrospective review showed that its feasible to maximize gross tumor volume dose coverage while exceeding most CNS OAR constraint standards, with ideal local control and no obvious increase of craniocerebral toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanyan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Fuzhou, China
- Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China
| | - Quxia Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Tianzhu Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Cairong Hu
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jingfeng Zong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Lisha Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Senan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Sufang Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Luying Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jianji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Qiaojuan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaojun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fan X, Huang Y, Xu P, Min Y, Li J, Feng M, Xu G, Lang J. Dosimetric analysis of radiation-induced brainstem necrosis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with IMRT. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:178. [PMID: 35177030 PMCID: PMC8851808 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09213-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiation-induced brainstem necrosis (RIBN) is a late life-threatening complication that can appear after treatment in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the relationship between RIBN and radiation dose is not still well-defined. Methods During January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 1063 patients with NPC were treated at Sichuan cancer hospital with IMRT. A total of 479 patients were eligible for dosimetric analysis. Dosimetric parameters of the RIBN, Dmax(the maximum dose), D0.1c (maximum average dose delivered to a 0.1-cc volume), D1cc, D2cc, D3cc, D5cc, D10cc and Dmean (mean does) were evaluated and recorded. ROC curve was used to analyze the area under curve (AUC) and cutoff points. Logistic regression for screening dose-volume parameter and logistic dose response model were used to predict the incidence of brainstem necrosis. Results Among the 479 patients with NPC, 6 patients were diagnosed with RIBN, the incidence of RIBN was 1.25% (6/479), and the median time to RIBN after treatment was 28.5 months (range 18–48 months). The dose of the brainstem in patients with RIBN were higher than that in patients without necrosis. ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of Dmax was the largest (0.987). Moreover, logistic stepwise regression indicated that Dmax was the most important dose factor. The RIBN incidence at 5% over 5 years (TD5/5) and 50% incidence over 5 years (TD50/5) was 69.59 Gy and76.45 Gy, respectively. Conclusions Brainstem necrosis is associated with high dose irritation. Dmax is the most significant predictive dosimetric factor for RIBN. Dmax of brainstem should be considered as the dose limitation parameter. We suggest that the limitation dose for brainstem was Dmax < 69.59 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xigang Fan
- Department of Oncology, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, Sichuan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yecai Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Peng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yanmei Min
- Department of Oncology, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, Mianyang, Sichuan, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Mei Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Guohui Xu
- School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,Department of Interventional Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jinyi Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. .,School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Treatment of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2022; 2021:4793517. [PMID: 34976300 PMCID: PMC8720020 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4793517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiation-induced brain necrosis (RBN) is a serious complication of intracranial as well as skull base tumors after radiotherapy. In the past, due to the lack of effective treatment, radiation brain necrosis was considered to be progressive and irreversible. With better understanding in histopathology and neuroimaging, the occurrence and development of RBN have been gradually clarified, and new treatment methods are constantly emerging. In recent years, some scholars have tried to treat RBN with bevacizumab, nerve growth factor, and gangliosides and have achieved similar results. Some cases of brain necrosis can be repairable and reversible. We aimed to summarize the incidence, pathogenesis, and treatment of RBN.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang T, Xu M, Mi J, Yang H, Liu Z, Huang L, Hu K, Wang R. Loosening Neuro-Optic Structures Dosimetric Constraints Provides High 5-Year Local Recurrence-Free Survival With Acceptable Toxicity in T4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:598320. [PMID: 33692949 PMCID: PMC7937960 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.598320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Whether the original dosimetric constraints of neuro-optic structures (NOS) are appropriate for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) remains controversial. The present study compared the survival rates and radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) occurrence between T4 NPC patients whose NOS were irradiated with a near maximum dose received by 2% of the volume (D2%) >55 Gy and ≤55 Gy. Moreover, the NOS dosimetric parameters and their correlation with RION occurrence were also evaluated. Methods In this retrospective study, 256 T4 NPC patients treated with IMRT between May 2009 and December 2013 were included. Patient characteristics, survival rates, dosimetric parameters, and RION incidence were compared between the D2% ≤55 Gy and D2% >55 Gy groups. Results The median follow-up durations were 87 and 83 months for patients in the D2% >55 Gy and D2% ≤55 Gy groups, respectively. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 92.0 and 84.0% in the D2% >55 Gy and D2% ≤55 Gy groups (P = 0.043), respectively. There was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) between both groups (D2% >55 Gy, 81.6%; D2% ≤55 Gy, 79.4%; P = 0.586). No patients developed severe RION (Grades 3–5), and there was no significant difference (P = 0.958) in the incidence of RION between the two groups. The maximum dose of NOS significantly affected the RION incidence, with a cutoff point of 70.77 Gy. Conclusion Appropriately loosening NOS dosimetric constraints in order to ensure a more sufficient dose to the target volume can provide a better 5-year local recurrence-free survival and acceptable neuro-optic toxicity in T4 NPC patients undergoing IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Meng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Jinglin Mi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Oncology, Liuzhou Worker Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Zhengchun Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
| | - Lulu Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Kai Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Rensheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wen DW, Lin L, Mao YP, Chen CY, Chen FP, Wu CF, Huang XD, Li ZX, Xu SS, Kou J, Yang XL, Ma J, Sun Y, Zhou GQ. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for predicting temporal lobe injury after intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A large registry-based retrospective study from China. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:99-105. [PMID: 33484752 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop predictive models with dosimetric and clinical variables for temporal lobe injury (TLI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of 8194 NPC patients who received IMRT-based treatment were retrospectively reviewed. TLI was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. Dosimetric factors were selected by penalized regression and machine learning, with area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) calculated. Cox proportional hazards models containing the most predictive dosimetric factor with/without clinical variables were performed. A nomogram was generated as a visualization of Cox regression for predicting TLI-free survival. RESULTS During median follow-up of 66.8 months (interquartile range [IQR] 54.2-82.2 months), 12.1% of patients (989/8194) developed TLI. Median latency from IMRT to TLI was 36 months (IQR 28-47 months). D0.5cc (dose delivered to 0.5-cm3 temporal-lobe volume) was the most predictive dosimetric factor (AUC: 0.799). Tolerance dose for 5% and 50% probabilities to develop TLI in 5 years were 65.06 Gy (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.19-65.92) and 89.75 Gy (95% CI: 87.39-92.11), respectively. A nomogram comprising age, T stage, and D0.5cc significantly outperformed the model with only D0.5cc in predicting TLI (C-index: 0.78 vs. 0.737 in train set; 0.775 vs. 0.73 in test set; both P < 0.001). The nomogram-defined high-risk group had worse 5-year TLI-free survival. CONCLUSIONS D0.5cc of 65.06 Gy was the tolerance dose of the temporal lobe. Reducing D0.5cc decreased risk of TLI, especially in older patients with advanced T stage. The nomogram could predict TLI precisely and allow individualized follow-up management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan-Wan Wen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chun-Yan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fo-Ping Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chen-Fei Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Dan Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Xuan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Si-Si Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia Kou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xing-Li Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Guan-Qun Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Research progress on mechanism and dosimetry of brainstem injury induced by intensity-modulated radiotherapy, proton therapy, and heavy ion radiotherapy. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:5011-5020. [PMID: 32318844 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06843-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective method for treating head and neck cancer (HNC). However, RT may cause side effects during and after treatment. Radiation-induced brainstem injury (BSI) is often neglected due to its low incidence and short survival time and because it is indistinguishable from intracranial tumor progression. It is currently believed that the possible mechanism of radiation-induced BSI includes increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and damage of vascular endothelial cells, neurons, and glial cells as well as an inflammatory response and oxidative stress. At present, it is still difficult to avoid BSI even with several advanced RT techniques. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the most commonly used therapeutic technique in the field of RT. Compared with early conformal therapy, it has greatly reduced the injury to normal tissues. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) and heavy ion radiotherapy (HIT) have good dose distribution due to the presence of a Bragg peak, which not only results in better control of the tumor but also minimizes the dose to the surrounding normal tissues. There are many clinical studies on BSI caused by IMRT, PBT, and HIT. In this paper, we review the mechanism, dosimetry, and other aspects of BSI caused by IMRT, PBT, and HIT.Key Points• Enhanced MRI imaging can better detect radiation-induced BSI early.• This article summarized the dose constraints of brainstem toxicity in clinical studies using different techniques including IMRT, PBT, and HIT and recommended better dose constraints pattern to clinicians.• The latest pathological mechanism of radiation-induced BSI and the corresponding advanced treatment methods will be discussed.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee AW, Ng WT, Pan JJ, Chiang CL, Poh SS, Choi HC, Ahn YC, AlHussain H, Corry J, Grau C, Grégoire V, Harrington KJ, Hu CS, Kwong DL, Langendijk JA, Le QT, Lee NY, Lin JC, Lu TX, Mendenhall WM, O'Sullivan B, Ozyar E, Peters LJ, Rosenthal DI, Sanguineti G, Soong YL, Tao Y, Yom SS, Wee JT. International Guideline on Dose Prioritization and Acceptance Criteria in Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:567-580. [PMID: 31276776 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma requires high radiation doses. The balance of the risks of local recurrence owing to inadequate tumor coverage versus the potential damage to the adjacent organs at risk (OARs) is of critical importance. With advancements in technology, high target conformality is possible. Nonetheless, to achieve the best possible dose distribution, optimal setting of dose targets and dose prioritization for tumor volumes and various OARs is fundamental. Radiation doses should always be guided by the As Low As Reasonably Practicable principle. There are marked variations in practice. This study aimed to develop a guideline to serve as a global practical reference. METHODS AND MATERIALS A literature search on dose tolerances and normal-tissue complications after treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma was conducted. In addition, published guidelines and protocols on dose prioritization and constraints were reviewed. A text document and preliminary set of variants was circulated to a panel of international experts with publications or extensive experience in the field. An anonymized voting process was conducted to rank the proposed variants. A summary of the initial voting and different opinions expressed by members were then recirculated to the whole panel for review and reconsideration. Based on the comments of the panel, a refined second proposal was recirculated to the same panel. The current guideline was based on majority voting after repeated iteration for final agreement. RESULTS Variation in opinion among international experts was repeatedly iterated to develop a guideline describing appropriate dose prioritization and constraints. The percentage of final agreement on the recommended parameters and alternative views is shown. The rationale for the recommendations and the limitations of current evidence are discussed. CONCLUSIONS Through this comprehensive review of available evidence and interactive exchange of vast experience by international experts, a guideline was developed to provide a practical reference for setting dose prioritization and acceptance criteria for tumor volumes and OARs. The final decision on the treatment prescription should be based on the individual clinical situation and the patient's acceptance of optimal balance of risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne W Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital and University of Hong Kong, China
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Jian Ji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chi-Leung Chiang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital and University of Hong Kong, China
| | - Sharon S Poh
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Oncology ACP, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Horace C Choi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hussain AlHussain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - June Corry
- Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cai Grau
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Center for Molecular Imaging, Oncology and Radiotherapy, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium and Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Kevin J Harrington
- The Royal Marsden/The Institute of Cancer Research National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Chao Su Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Dora L Kwong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong and Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Quynh Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, NRG Oncology and Head and Neck Cancer International Group, California
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Jin Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tai Xiang Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Enis Ozyar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Lester J Peters
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Yoke Lim Soong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Oncology ACP, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Yungan Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Sue S Yom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Joseph T Wee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Oncology ACP, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|