Palliative Radiation Therapy in Bladder Cancer—Importance of Patient Selection: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer in elderly and frail people: Is hypofractionated radiotherapy a feasible approach when no other local options are available?

AIM

The study aims to report the feasibility and safety of palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy targeting macroscopic bladder tumors in a monocentric cohort of frail and elderly bladder cancer patients not eligible for curative treatments.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy to the gross disease or to the tumor bed after transurethral resection of bladder tumor from 2017 to 2021 at the European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, were retrospectively considered. Schedules of treatment were 30 and 25 Gy in 5 fractions (both every other day, and consecutive days). Treatment response was evaluated with radiological investigation and/or cystoscopy. Toxicity assessment was carried out according to RTOG/EORTC v2.0 criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were included in the study, of these 11 received hypofractionated radiotherapy on the macroscopic target volume and five on the tumor bed after transurethral resection of bladder tumor. No grade (G) >2 acute toxicities were described after treatment for both groups. Only one patient in the group receiving radiotherapy on the macroscopic disease reported G4 GU late toxicity. Ten patients had available follow-up status (median FU time 18 months), of them six had complete response, one had stable disease, and three had progression of disease. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 60% and 70%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data demonstrate that palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy for bladder cancer in a frail and elderly population is technically feasible, with an acceptable toxicity profile. These outcomes emphasize the potential of this approach in a non-radical setting and could help to provide more solid indications in this underrepresented setting of patients.

The role of radiation therapy for de novo metastatic bladder and renal cancers

Metastatic bladder and renal cancers account respectively for 2.1% and 1.8% of cancer deaths worldwide. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the management of metastatic disease, by demonstrating considerable improvements in overall survival. However, despite initial sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors for most patients, both bladder and renal cancer are associated with short progression-free survival and overall survival, raising the need for further strategies to improve their efficacy. Combining systemic therapies with local approaches is a longstanding concept in urological oncology, in clinical settings including both oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease. Radiation therapy has been increasingly studied with either cytoreductive, consolidative, ablative or immune boosting purposes, but the long-term impact of this strategy remains unclear. This review intends to address the impact of radiation therapy with either curative or palliative intent, for synchronous de novo metastatic bladder and renal cancers.

Radiotherapy in metastatic bladder cancer

PURPOSE

To review available and emerging evidence of radiotherapy for symptom management and disease control in metastatic bladder cancer.

METHODS

A literature search and subsequent cross-referencing were carried out for articles in the PubMed and Scopus databases using terms 'radiotherapy' OR 'palliative radiation therapy' with 'metastatic bladder cancer' OR 'advanced bladder cancer' between 1990 and 2023, excluding articles with no English translation.

RESULTS

Palliative radiotherapy is an effective and accessible treatment for the alleviation of haematuria and pain due to the primary and metastatic disease. With growing recognition of oligometastatic disease state at diagnosis, response, or progression, radiotherapy can consolidate response by ablating residual or resistant lesions. Experience with other primary cancers supports positive impact of radiotherapy on disease control, quality of life, and survival in oligometastatic stage, without significant adverse effects. Alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors, fibroblast growth receptor inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates, the immunomodulatory potential of radiotherapy is being explored in combination with these systemic therapies for metastatic bladder cancer.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is an effective, safe, and accessible treatment modality for palliation as well as disease control in various clinical settings of metastatic bladder cancer. Its role in oligometastatic stage in combination with systemic therapy is expected to expand with emerging evidence.

Utility and safety of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in older patients with bladder cancer

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in older patients with bladder cancer (BCa).Material and methods: We reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 110 patients with BCa who underwent RARC at Gifu University Hospital between February 2019 and January 2023. Older patients were defined as those with BCa aged ≥ 75 years. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups: those aged < 75 years (Group I) and those aged ≥ 75 years (Group II). Oncological outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were the primary endpoints of the study; the secondary endpoints were the surgical and pathological outcomes.Results: A shorter console time, less blood loss, and reduced time to postoperative fluid and food intake in Group II may be attributed to the fact that more patients opted for ureterocutaneostomy in Group II than in Group I. In all patients, the three-year OS and RFS rates were 84.7% and 88.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS or RFS between the two groups. (p = .403, p = .963, respectively).Conclusions: RARC appears to be a safe and useful treatment option for older patients with BCa.

Prevention of local symptoms in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients: clinical significance of local radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the significance of local radiation therapy (LRT) for prevention of local symptoms (LSs) caused by muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 133 patients from 13 hospitals. MIBC patients with or without metastases who were treated with LRT alone from January 2015 through December 2020 were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were urinary diversion (UD) prior to LRT, non-MIBC, or lack of clinical information. LSs were defined as hematuria requiring invasive treatment or transfusion, UD after LRT, bladder tamponade, and opioid use for bladder pain.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients were finally enrolled in the study. During the median follow-up period of 13.5 months, 30 patients (26.3%) had LSs. Risk factors of LSs in multivariate analysis were a prior history of non-MIBC (NMIBC) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36 to 6.56; P < 0.01), radiation dose of less than 50 Gray (Gy) (HR 3.99; 95% CI, 1.80 to 8.82; P < 0.01), and tumor stage 3 or more (HR 2.43; 95% CI, 1.14 to 5.21; P = 0.02). Risk factors of overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis were being female (HR 3.32; 95% CI, 1.68 to 6.58; P < 0.01), an age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity index of 6 or more (HR 2.19; 95% CI, 1.18 to 4.10; P = 0.01), distant metastases (HR 3.20; 95% CI, 1.39 to 6.58; P < 0.01), and tumor size of 40 mm or more (HR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.34 to 4.52; P < 0.01). Toxicity (all grades) occurred in 40.4% of the patients, 4.8% with grade 3 or more and 95.2% with lower grades.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined the risk factors for LSs in MIBC patients treated with LRT alone. An escalated-dose of 50 Gy or more may contribute to prevention of LSs caused by MIBC. Thus, dose-escalated LRT for MIBC patients who can expect favorable survival may be a good option to avoid future annoying LSs.

Palliative Appropriateness Criteria: A Pragmatic Method to Evaluate the Suitability of Palliative Radiotherapy Fractionation

Purpose: To describe a novel metric to aid clinical decision making between shorter versus longer palliative radiotherapy (PRT) regimens using objective patient factors. Materials and Methods: Patients receiving PRT at a single institution between 2014 and 2018 were reviewed. The time between PRT start and finish was calculated and divided by overall survival (in days from start of PRT) to generate the percent of remaining life (PRL). This value was compared across various clinical factors using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Factors identified with a significance level p < 0.01 were included in a novel Palliative Appropriateness Criteria Score (PACS) and were included in an online risk assessment tool to assist clinicians in patient-specific fractionation decisions. Results: Totally 1027 courses of PRT were analyzed. Median age was 64 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 3-4 in 22%. Primary malignancies included were lung (38%), breast (13.8%), prostate (9.3%), and other (39%). The indication for PRT was pain (61%), neurological (21%), or other (18%). Palliative regimens included 199 (19.4%) receiving single fraction, 176 (17.1%) receiving 2-5 fractions, and 652 (63.5%) receiving 10 fractions. Median follow-up was 83 days overall and 437 days for patients alive at last follow-up. Factors significantly associated with increased PRL (and included in the PACS) were male gender, ECOG 3-4, lung or "other" primary diagnosis (vs. breast or prostate), PRT indication (neurological dysfunction vs. pain/other), inpatient status, and extraosseous sites treatment. Death within 30 days was significantly associated with high-risk PACS categorization, regardless of fractionation scheme (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The PACS is a novel metric for evaluating the utility of PRT regimens to improve clinical decision making. Single fraction is associated with low PRL. When considering multifraction PRT regimens, the PACS identifies patients who may benefit from shorter courses of PRT and alternatively, low-risk patients for whom a more protracted course is reasonable. Prospective external validation is warranted.

Effects of radical cystectomy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy on the risk of long-term heart-specific death in bladder cancer patients

Background

At present, the low risk of bladder cancer (BCa)-specific death has allowed for investigation into treatment-related cardiotoxicity. To aid clinicians in selecting appropriate cardiovascular disease screening strategies and interventions, this study explored the heart-specific mortality and prognostic factors of patients with BCa after radical cystectomy (RC), radiotherapy (RT), or chemotherapy (CT), and compared their long-term heart-specific mortality with that of the general male population.

Methods

We identified three different treatments for BCa patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database: RC, RT, and CT. Patients were included from 2000 to 2012 and followed through 2015. A cumulative mortality curve and competitive risk regression model were applied to evaluate the prognostic factors of heart-specific mortality, and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated.

Results

Of 39,500 men, 30.3%, 18.8%, and 50.9% received RC, RT, and CT, respectively. For patients with a survival period of less than 50 months, tumor-specific death exhibited a rapidly increasing trend, which subsequently flatlined. However, the rates heart-specific mortality and other causes exhibited a tendency to increase stably. The heart-specific and all-cause mortality rates of patients in any age group treated with the three abovementioned strategies were higher than those of the general population. The heart-specific mortality of patients with carcinoma in situ treated with RC and CT exceeded their all-cause mortality, while that of other tumor stages did not. The risks of heart-specific [sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) =1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22–1.57] and tumor-specific (SHR =1.68; 95% CI: 1.60–1.77) deaths in patients who received RT were higher than those of patients who underwent CT.

Conclusions

The risks of heart-specific and tumor-specific deaths in patients who received RT were higher than those of the RC and CT groups, especially in patients over 65 years of age who received RT.

Efficacy and Survival after Palliative Radiotherapy for Malignant Pulmonary Obstruction

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of palliative radiotherapy (PRT) for patients with pulmonary obstruction from advanced malignancy and identify factors associated with lung re-expansion and survival. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all patients treated with PRT for malignant pulmonary obstruction (n = 108) at our institution between 2010 and 2018. Radiographic evidence of lung re-expansion was determined through review of follow-up CT or chest X-ray. Cumulative incidence of re-expansion and overall survival (OS) were estimated using competing risk methodology. Clinical characteristics were evaluated for association with re-expansion, OS, and early mortality. Treatment time to remaining life ratio (TT:RL) was evaluated as a novel metric for palliative treatment. Results: Eighty-one percent of patients had collapse of an entire lung lobe, 46% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 3-4, and 64% were inpatient at consultation. Eighty-four patients had follow-up imaging available, and 25 (23%) of all patients had lung re-expansion at median time of 35 days. Rates of death without re-expansion were 38% and 65% at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Median OS was 56 days. Death within 30 days of PRT occurred in 38%. Inpatients and larger tumors trended toward lower rates of re-expansion. Notable factors associated with OS were re-expansion, nonlung histology, tumor size, and performance status. Median TT:RL was 0.11 and significantly higher for subgroups: ECOG 3-4 (0.19), inpatients (0.16), patients with larger tumors (0.14), those unfit for systemic therapy (0.17), and with 10-fraction PRT (0.14). Conclusion: One-fourth of patients experienced re-expansion after PRT for malignant pulmonary obstruction. Survival is poor and a significant proportion of remaining life may be spent on treatment. Careful consideration of these clinical factors is recommended when considering PRT fractionation.

Palliative Radiotherapy for Advanced Cancers: Indications and Outcomes

Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is well-tolerated, effective treatment for pain, bleeding, obstruction, and other symptoms/complications of advanced cancer. It is an important component of multidisciplinary management. It should be considered even for patients with poor prognosis, because it can offer rapid symptomatic relief. Furthermore, expanding indications for treatment of noncurable disease have shown that PRT can extend survival for select patients. For those with good prognosis, advanced PRT techniques may improve the therapeutic ratio, maximizing tumor control while limiting toxicity. PRT referral should be considered for any patient with symptomatic or asymptomatic sites of disease where local control is desired.

Palliative radiotherapy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The optimal dose fractionation for palliative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with symptomatic advanced bladder cancer is unclear. This study aimed to determine if a higher dose of RT was associated with improved symptoms response rates.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Central and Embase for eligible studies published from 1990 to 2019. The primary outcomes were symptoms response rates for hematuria, dysuria and frequency. Secondary outcomes included treatment-related adverse events and quality of life.

RESULTS

We found one randomized, four prospective and eight retrospective non-comparative observational studies including 1320 patients who received palliative bladder radiotherapy for symptom relief. The dose fractionation schedules varied across studies ranging from 8 Gy single fraction to 60 Gy in 2 to 8 Gy per fraction. The pooled response rates for hematuria, dyuria and frequency symptoms were 74%, 58% and 71% respectively. A higher dose of RT was not associated with improved response rates of hematuria and frequency. However, a higher dose of RT was associated with a longer duration of hematuria response and reduced response of dysuria. Grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity occurred in up to 26% of patients. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were reported in one study.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrates that a higher dose of bladder RT was not associated with improved response rates of hematuria and frequency symptoms but was associated with reduced response of dysuria. Higher doses of bladder RT was associated with more durable hematuria response. Prospective studies to determine the effects of palliative bladder radiotherapy on HRQOL outcomes are warranted.

Clinical therapies and nano drug delivery systems for urinary bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is the 10^th most commonly occurring malignancy worldwide with a 75% of 5-year survival rate, while it ranks 13^th among the deaths occurring due to cancer. The majority of bladder cancer cases are diagnosed at an early stage and 70% are of non-invasive grade. However, 70% of these cases develop chemoresistance and progress to the muscle invasive stage. Conventional chemotherapy treatments are unsuccessful in curbing chemoresistance, bladder cancer progression while having an adverse side effect, which is mainly due to off-target drug distribution. Therefore, new drug delivery strategies, new therapeutics and therapies or their combination are being explored to develop better treatments. In this regard, nanotechnology has shown promise in the targeted delivery of therapeutics to bladder cancer cells. This review discusses the recent discovery of new therapeutics (chemotherapeutics, immunotherapeutic, and gene therapies), recent developments in the delivery of therapeutics using nano drug delivery systems, and the combination treatments with FDA-approved therapies, i.e., hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy. We also discussed the potential of other novel drug delivery systems that are minimally explored in bladder cancer. Lastly, we discussed the clinical status of therapeutics and therapies for bladder cancer. Overall, this review can provide a summary of available treatments for bladder cancer, and also provide opportunities for further development of drug delivery systems for better management of bladder cancer.

Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer in the Elderly Patient With a Focus on Hypofractionated Radiotherapy

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer is most frequently diagnosed in older patients and the presence of multimorbidity and frailty is common. This means that many patients are unsuitable for definitive treatment with radical cystectomy/(chemo)radiotherapy and are at risk of poor survival outcomes and considerable disease-related morbidity. Screening tools for functional status may be useful to determine the most appropriate treatment for an older person and to identify patients most likely to benefit from comprehensive geriatric assessment and its targeted prehabilitation interventions. For patients unsuitable for definitive treatment, ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy schedules may provide good local control with acceptable toxicity. Short fractionated palliative radiotherapy schedules can provide effective symptom control for patients unsuitable for longer courses of treatment.

The role of palliative radiotherapy in the management of elderly and frail patients with advanced bladder cancer: A survey by the AIRO uro-group

Radiotherapy (RT) is rarely used in the palliative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This survey aims to explore current care patterns within the Italian Radiation Oncologist community on this topic. In 2020, the uro-oncological study group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) conducted a survey evaluating the RT role in advanced MIBC. An electronic questionnaire was administered online to the society members asking for: general considerations, patients' selection, and aim of the treatment, RT schedule and practical consideration, past and future perspective. Sixty-one questionnaires were returned (33% response rate). Most responders (62.30%) declared to work in a Center with a multidisciplinary uro-oncological team, and 8.20% to evaluate more than 20 patients with MIBC/year for palliative RT. Elderly patients were the most frequently evaluated (46.7%) and life expectancy was the most common selection criteria (44.60%). Thirty Gy in 10 fractions (58.9%), whole bladder as GTV (62.5%), PTV isotropic margins of 1.5-2 cm (44.6%) and IMRT/VMAT technique (58.14%) were the most common treatment choices. Patients amenable for bladder palliative RT were most commonly referred by the urologist (43.86%) or the multidisciplinary team (38%). The reported main reasons for the low involvement of radiation oncologist in the management of MIBC patients were low attention to the palliative setting in bladder cancer (37.5%); radiation oncologist not involved in the management of these patients (32.1%); cases not discussed in the multidisciplinary board (26.8%). This survey illustrated the current use of palliative RT for patients with advanced MIBC in Italy and suggested the need for a greater involvement of radiation oncologists in their management.

Morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in octogenarians: results from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group

Objectives

To evaluate the postoperative complication and mortality rate following laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) in octogenarians.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing postoperative complication and mortality rates depending on age in a consecutive series of 1890 patients who underwent RARC with ICUD for bladder cancer between 2004 and 2018 in 10 European centres. Outcomes of patients aged <80 years and those aged ≥80 years were compared with regard to postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grading) and mortality rate. Cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) and other‐cause mortality (OCM) after surgery were calculated using the non‐parametric Aalen‐Johansen estimator.

Results

A total of 1726 patients aged <80 years and 164 aged ≥80 years were included in the analysis. The 30‐ and 90‐day rate for high‐grade (Clavien–Dindo grades III–V) complications were 15% and 21% for patients aged <80 years compared to 11% and 13% for patients aged ≥80 years (P = 0.2 and P = 0.03), respectively. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for pre‐ and postoperative variables, age ≥80 years was not an independent predictor of high‐grade complications (odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.3–1.1; P = 0.12). The non‐cancer‐related 90‐day mortality was 2.3% for patients aged ≥80 years and 1.8% for those aged <80 years, respectively (P = 0.7). The estimated 12‐month CSM and OCM rates for those aged <80 years were 8% and 3%, and for those aged ≥80 years, 15% and 8%, respectively (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The minimally invasive approach to RARC with ICUD for bladder cancer in well‐selected elderly patients (aged ≥80 years) achieved a tolerable high‐grade complication rate; the 90‐day postoperative mortality rate was driven by cancer progression and the non‐cancer‐related rate was equivalent to that of patients aged <80 years. However, an increased OCM rate in this elderly group after the first year should be taken into account. These results will support clinicians and patients when balancing cancer‐related vs treatment‐related risks and benefits.

Palliative Radiation Therapy for Macroscopic Hematuria Caused by Urothelial Cancer

Background: To assess the efficacy and toxicity profiles of palliative radiation therapy (RT) for macroscopic hematuria (MH) caused by urothelial cancer.

Methods: A total of 25 urothelial cancer patients with MH who underwent palliative RT between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed in this retrospective study. The hematuria-free survival (HFS) time was defined as the period from complete resolution of MH to the recurrence of MH, death, or the last follow-up examination. Adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

Results: By the end of the median follow-up duration of 90 days (11–886 days), complete resolution of MH had been achieved in 22 patients (88%), and the median interval between the start of RT and resolution of MH was 9 days (2–179 days). Of the 22 patients in whom the symptom resolved, 9 (41%) developed recurrent MH, and the median time to relapse of MH was 129 days (30–692 days). The median RT dose was 30 Gy (20–40 Gy). Nine (36%) patients received a blood transfusion before the RT. The three-month HFS rate was 52.1%. There was a significant difference in the three-month HFS rate between patients with and without a history of pretreatment blood transfusion (HFS rate: 34.6% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.03). Grade 2 urinary tract pain and grade 3 diarrhea were seen in one patient each.

Conclusion: Palliative RT appeared to be effective with limited toxicities for urothelial cancer patients with MH.

Clinical Guidance for the Management of Patients with Urothelial Cancers During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Rapid Review

The current COVID-19 pandemic presents a substantial obstacle to cancer patient care. Data from China as well as risk models suppose that cancer patients, particularly those on active, immunosuppressive therapies are at higher risks of severe infection from the illness. In addition, staff illness and restructuring of services to deal with the crisis will inevitably place treatment capacities under significant strain. These guidelines aim to expand on those provided by NHS England regarding cancer care during the coronavirus pandemic by examining the known literature and provide guidance in managing patients with urothelial and rarer urinary tract cancers. In particular, they address the estimated risk and benefits of standard treatments and consider the alternatives in the current situation. As a result, it is recommended that this guidance will help form a framework for shared decision making with patients. Moreover, they do not advise a one-size-fits-all approach but recommend continual assessment of the situation with discussion within and between centres.