1
|
Colori A, Ackwerh R, Chang YC, Cody K, Dunlea C, Gains JE, Gaunt T, Gillies CMS, Hardy C, Lalli N, Lim PS, Soto C, Gaze MN. Paediatric radiotherapy in the United Kingdom: an evolving subspecialty and a paradigm for integrated teamworking in oncology. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:21-30. [PMID: 38263828 PMCID: PMC11027255 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Many different malignancies occur in children, but overall, cancer in childhood is rare. Survival rates have improved appreciably and are higher compared with most adult tumour types. Treatment schedules evolve as a result of clinical trials and are typically complex and multi-modality, with radiotherapy an integral component of many. Risk stratification in paediatric oncology is increasingly refined, resulting in a more personalized use of radiation. Every available modality of radiation delivery: simple and advanced photon techniques, proton beam therapy, molecular radiotherapy, and brachytherapy, have their place in the treatment of children's cancers. Radiotherapy is rarely the sole treatment. As local therapy, it is often given before or after surgery, so the involvement of the surgeon is critically important, particularly when brachytherapy is used. Systemic treatment is the standard of care for most paediatric tumour types, concomitant administration of chemotherapy is typical, and immunotherapy has an increasing role. Delivery of radiotherapy is not done by clinical or radiation oncologists alone; play specialists and anaesthetists are required, together with mould room staff, to ensure compliance and immobilization. The support of clinical radiologists is needed to ensure the correct interpretation of imaging for target volume delineation. Physicists and dosimetrists ensure the optimal dose distribution, minimizing exposure of organs at risk. Paediatric oncology doctors, nurses, and a range of allied health professionals are needed for the holistic wrap-around care of the child and family. Radiographers are essential at every step of the way. With increasing complexity comes a need for greater centralization of services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Colori
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Raymond Ackwerh
- Department of Anaesthetics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Yen-Ch’ing Chang
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Kristy Cody
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Cathy Dunlea
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer E Gains
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Trevor Gaunt
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Callum M S Gillies
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Hardy
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Narinder Lalli
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Pei S Lim
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Carmen Soto
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Mark N Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Trnkova P, Toshito T, Heijmen B, Richter C, Aznar M, Albertini F, Bolsi A, Daartz J, Bertholet J, Knopf A. A survey of practice patterns for real-time intrafractional motion-management in particle therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 26:100439. [PMID: 37124167 PMCID: PMC10133874 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Organ motion compromises accurate particle therapy delivery. This study reports on the practice patterns for real-time intrafractional motion-management in particle therapy to evaluate current clinical practice and wishes and barriers to implementation. Materials and methods An institutional questionnaire was distributed to particle therapy centres worldwide (7/2020-6/2021) asking which type(s) of real-time respiratory motion management (RRMM) methods were used, for which treatment sites, and what were the wishes and barriers to implementation. This was followed by a three-round DELPHI consensus analysis (10/2022) to define recommendations on required actions and future vision. With 70 responses from 17 countries, response rate was 100% for Europe (23/23 centres), 96% for Japan (22/23) and 53% for USA (20/38). Results Of the 68 clinically operational centres, 85% used RRMM, with 41% using both rescanning and active methods. Sixty-four percent used active-RRMM for at least one treatment site, mostly with gating guided by an external marker. Forty-eight percent of active-RRMM users wished to expand or change their RRMM technique. The main barriers were technical limitations and limited resources. From the DELPHI analysis, optimisation of rescanning parameters, improvement of motion models, and pre-treatment 4D evaluation were unanimously considered clinically important future focus. 4D dose calculation was identified as the top requirement for future commercial treatment planning software. Conclusion A majority of particle therapy centres have implemented RRMM. Still, further development and clinical integration were desired by most centres. Joint industry, clinical and research efforts are needed to translate innovation into efficient workflows for broad-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Petra Trnkova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Toshiyuki Toshito
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marianne Aznar
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Juliane Daartz
- F. Burr Proton Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antje Knopf
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Science FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gough J, Mowat S, Sellman L, Robinson K, Youings M, Mandeville H. Institutional experience of using active breathing control for paediatric and teenage patients receiving thoraco-abdominal radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100575. [PMID: 36686562 PMCID: PMC9850023 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Active Breathing Control (ABC) is a motion management strategy that facilitates reproducible breath-hold for thoracic radiotherapy (RT), which may reduce radiation dose to organs at risk (OARs). Reduction of radiation-induced toxicity is of high importance in younger patients. However, there is little published literature on the feasibility of ABC in this group. The purpose of this study was to report our experience of using ABC for paediatric and teenage patients. Methods Patients ≤18 years referred for thoracic RT using ABC at our centre from 2013-2021 were identified. Electronic records were retrospectively reviewed to obtain information on diagnosis, RT dose and technique, OAR dosimetry, tolerability of ABC, post-treatment imaging and early toxicity rates. Results 12 patients completed RT and were able to comply with ABC during planning and for the duration of RT. Median age was 15.5 years (10-18 years). Diagnoses were: Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 5), mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (n = 1), Ewing sarcoma (n = 5) and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1). For mediastinal RT cases (n = 6), median dose delivered was 30.6Gy(19.8-40Gy), median mean heart dose was 11.4Gy(4.8-19.4Gy), median mean lung dose was 9.9Gy(5.7-14.5Gy) and mean lung V20 was 10.9%. For ipsilateral RT cases, (n = 6), median hemithorax and total doses to primary tumour were 18Gy(15-20Gy) and 52.2Gy(36-60Gy) respectively. Median mean heart dose was 19.5Gy(10.6-33.2Gy) and median mean lung dose was 17.7Gy(16.3-30.5Gy). Mean bilateral lung V20 was 39.6%. Median mean contralateral lung dose was 5.2Gy(3.5-11.6Gy) and mean contralateral lung V20 was 1.5%. At a median follow-up of 36 months, only 1 patient had symptomatic radiation pneumonitis having received further thoracic RT following relapse. Conclusions ABC is feasible and well tolerated in younger patients receiving RT. Children as young as 10 years are able to comply. Use of ABC results in OAR dosimetry which is comparable to similar data in adults and can facilitate RT for extensive thoracic sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Gough
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK,The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK,Corresponding author at: Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Henry Mandeville
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK,The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lundgaard AY, Dejanovic D, Berthelsen AK, Andersen FL, Rechner LA, Borgwardt L, Hjalgrim LL, Specht L, Maraldo MV. Baseline FDG PET/CT in free breathing versus deep inspiration breath-hold for pediatric patients with mediastinal lymphoma. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:239-246. [PMID: 34533416 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1974554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prospective TEDDI protocol investigates the feasibility of radiotherapy delivery in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) for pediatric patients. To secure optimal radiotherapy planning, a diagnostic baseline FDG PET/CT in free breathing (FB) and DIBH was acquired. The anatomical changes in the mediastinum and the effect on PET metrics between the two breathing conditions were assessed for pediatric patients with mediastinal lymphoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten patients aged 5-17 were included and had a PET/CT in FB and DIBH. Metabolic active lymphoma volumes were manually delineated with a visually based segmentation method and the PET metrics were extracted. The anatomical lymphoma, lung and heart volumes were delineated on CT. RESULTS The lung volume increased while the heart was displaced caudally and separated from the lymphoma in DIBH compared to FB. Both the anatomical and the metabolically active lymphoma volumes appeared different regarding shape and configuration in the two breathing conditions. The image quality of the DIBH PET was equal to the FB PET regarding interpretation and delineation of lymphoma lesions. All PET metrics increased on the DIBH PET compared to the FB PET with the highest increase observed for the maximum standardized uptake value (33%, range 7-56%). CONCLUSION Diminished respiratory motion together with anatomical changes within the lymphoma increased all PET metrics in DIBH compared to FB. The anatomical changes observed in DIBH compared to FB are expected to reduce radiation doses to the heart and lungs in pediatric patients with mediastinal lymphoma referred for radiotherapy delivery in DIBH and, thereby, reduce their risk of late effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Danish Ethical Committee (H-16035870, approved November 24th 2016), the Danish Data Protection Agency (2012-58-0004, approved 1 January 2017). Registered retrospectively at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03315546, 20 October 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anni Young Lundgaard
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Danijela Dejanovic
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Kiil Berthelsen
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Flemming Littrup Andersen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Laura Ann Rechner
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lise Borgwardt
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisa Lyngsie Hjalgrim
- Department of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lena Specht
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maja Vestmø Maraldo
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scott AM, Reed WM. Panoramic radiography and patients with disability: a new simple breathing technique to reduce common airspace error. J Med Radiat Sci 2022; 69:261-266. [PMID: 34984850 PMCID: PMC9163455 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with intellectual disabilities often fail to follow traditional tongue position instructions for panoramic radiographs resulting in missed pathology or unnecessary further radiation. This simple breathing technique is a new clinical instruction method for panoramic radiography developed to reduce the most common patient position error: patient failure to hold the tongue to the roof of the mouth. The technique is suitable for all patients including young patients and those with intellectual disabilities. The simple breathing technique uses 'tell-show-do' communication methods and does not mention the tongue but utilises the known tongue positions that occur during breathing and swallowing. This simple breathing technique instruction for panoramic radiography uses a demonstration of 'breathe-in, breathe-out, swallow, lips closed and hold still' to reduce the intensity of both the palatoglossal and pharyngeal airspaces on panoramic radiographs. This method, referred in this article as the simple breathing technique, can improve the diagnostic potential of panoramic radiographs and can be used with young children and patients with intellectual disabilities, and this slow breathing technique can help them further relax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia M Scott
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Warren M Reed
- Medical Image Perception and Optimisation Group (MIOPeG), Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paolani G, Strolin S, Santoro M, Della Gala G, Tolento G, Guido A, Siepe G, Morganti AG, Strigari L. A novel tool for assessing the correlation of internal/external markers during SGRT guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy treatments. Phys Med 2021; 92:40-51. [PMID: 34856464 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An in-house developed tool was implemented and validated to investigate the skin surface, hepatic dome, and target displacement for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of thoracic/abdominal lesions using a Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) system combined with 4D- images. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fourteen consecutive patients with tumors near the hepatic dome undergoing SABR treatments were analyzed. For each patient, a planning 4D-CT and five 4D-CBCT images were acquired. The C-RAD technology was also used to register/monitor the position of the skin reference point (SRP) as an external marker representative of patient breathing. The 4D images were imported in the developed tool, and the absolute maximum height (Pmax,dome) of the hepatic dome on the ten respiratory phases was semi-automatically detected. Similarly, the contour of the skin surface was extracted in correspondence with the SRP position. The tool has been validated using an ad hoc modified moving phantom with pre-selected amplitudes and numbers of cycles. The Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were calculated. RESULTS There was a strong correlation between the skin motion amplitude based on 4D-CBCT and the C-RAD in all the patients (0.90 ± 0.08). Similarly, the mean ± SD of Pearson correlation coefficients of skin and Pmax,dome movements registered by 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT were 0.90 ± 0.05 and 0.94 ± 0.05, respectively. The mean ± SD of Pearson correlation coefficients comparing the skin and Pmax,dome displacements within each imaging modality were 0.88 ± 0.05 and 0.90 ± 0.05 for 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT, respectively. The SRP displacement during the set-up imaging and the treatment delivery were similar in all the investigated patients. Similar results were obtained for the ad hoc modified phantom in the preliminary validation phase. CONCLUSION The strong correlation between the tumor/ hepatic dome and skin displacements confirms that the SGRT approach can be considered appropriate for intra- and inter-fraction motion management in SABR therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Paolani
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Strolin
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Miriam Santoro
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Della Gala
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Tolento
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandra Guido
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|