1
|
Gillespie EF, Santos PMG, Curry M, Salz T, Chakraborty N, Caron M, Fuchs HE, Ledesma Vicioso N, Mathis N, Kumar R, O’Brien C, Patel S, Guttmann DM, Ostroff JS, Salner AL, Panoff JE, McIntosh AF, Pfister DG, Vaynrub M, Yang JT, Lipitz-Snyderman A. Implementation Strategies to Promote Short-Course Radiation for Bone Metastases. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2411717. [PMID: 38787561 PMCID: PMC11127116 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance For patients with nonspine bone metastases, short-course radiotherapy (RT) can reduce patient burden without sacrificing clinical benefit. However, there is great variation in uptake of short-course RT across practice settings. Objective To evaluate whether a set of 3 implementation strategies facilitates increased adoption of a consensus recommendation to treat nonspine bone metastases with short-course RT (ie, ≤5 fractions). Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized quality improvement study was conducted at 3 community-based cancer centers within an existing academic-community partnership. Rollout was initiated in 3-month increments between October 2021 and May 2022. Participants included treating physicians and patients receiving RT for nonspine bone metastases. Data analysis was performed from October 2022 to May 2023. Exposures Three implementation strategies-(1) dissemination of published consensus guidelines, (2) personalized audit-and-feedback reports, and (3) an email-based electronic consultation platform (eConsult)-were rolled out to physicians. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was adherence to the consensus recommendation of short-course RT for nonspine bone metastases. Mixed-effects logistic regression at the bone metastasis level was used to model associations between the exposure of physicians to the set of strategies (preimplementation vs postimplementation) and short-course RT, while accounting for patient and physician characteristics and calendar time, with a random effect for physician. Physician surveys were administered before implementation and after implementation to assess feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of each strategy. Results Forty-five physicians treated 714 patients (median [IQR] age at treatment start, 67 [59-75] years; 343 women [48%]) with 838 unique nonspine bone metastases during the study period. Implementing the set of strategies was not associated with use of short-course RT (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.45-1.34; P = .40), with unadjusted adherence rates of 53% (444 lesions) preimplementation vs 56% (469 lesions) postimplementation; however, the adjusted odds of adherence increased with calendar time (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.20-2.36; P = .003). All 3 implementation strategies were perceived as being feasible, acceptable, and appropriate; only the perception of audit-and-feedback appropriateness changed before vs after implementation (19 of 29 physicians [66%] vs 27 of 30 physicians [90%]; P = .03, Fisher exact test), with 20 physicians (67%) preferring reports quarterly. Conclusions and Relevance In this quality improvement study, a multicomponent set of implementation strategies was not associated with increased use of short-course RT within an academic-community partnership. However, practice improved with time, perhaps owing to secular trends or physician awareness of the study. Audit-and-feedback was more appropriate than anticipated. Findings support the need to investigate optimal approaches for promoting evidence-based radiation practice across settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin F. Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle
| | - Patricia Mae G. Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael Curry
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Talya Salz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nirjhar Chakraborty
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael Caron
- Department of Strategic Partnerships, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hannah E. Fuchs
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nahomy Ledesma Vicioso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Noah Mathis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rahul Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami
| | - Connor O’Brien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Shivani Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lehigh Valley Cancer Institute, Allentown, Pennsylvania
| | - David M. Guttmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jamie S. Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew L. Salner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Joseph E. Panoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami
| | - Alyson F. McIntosh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lehigh Valley Cancer Institute, Allentown, Pennsylvania
| | - David G. Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Max Vaynrub
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan T. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Allison Lipitz-Snyderman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Agnoux E, Renan A, Faivre JC. Clinical trials that will change practices: News in palliative radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:746-753. [PMID: 37891036 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
Palliative radiotherapy is used to alleviate cancer-related symptoms. Symptomatic responses to palliative radiotherapy may however take several weeks, meaning that patients need to survive long enough to derive a real benefit. Oncologists can be optimistic when estimating survival for patients with advanced cancer and as a consequence some patients receiving palliative radiotherapy die before experiencing any gain. Models of patient survival have limited accuracy, particularly for predicting whether patients will die within the next 30 days. Dedicated rapid access palliative radiotherapy clinics, in which patients are assessed, simulated and treated on the same day, reduce the number of patient visits to the radiation oncology department and hence the burden on the patient as well as costs. Teleconsultation and advanced practice nurses can play a crucial role in providing rapid access to palliative radiotherapy in a dedicated palliative radiotherapy service. Single-fraction palliative radiotherapy should be offered to eligible patients if they are able to attend treatment and could potentially benefit from symptom palliation, irrespective of predicted life expectancy. Technical and organizational innovations have been proposed in order to dispense with the computed tomography scanner by carrying out the dosimetry on a recent diagnostic scanner or a magnetic resonance imaging scanner with integrated linear acceleration system. Stereotactic body radiation therapy makes it possible to envisage greater and more lasting analgesic benefits in patients with painful bone metastasis and good prognosis. Flash radiotherapy remains at the preclinical stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Agnoux
- Academic Department of Radiation Therapy & Brachytherapy, institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, centre Alexis-Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - A Renan
- Academic Department of Radiation Therapy & Brachytherapy, institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, centre Alexis-Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - J-C Faivre
- Academic Department of Radiation Therapy & Brachytherapy, institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, centre Alexis-Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Merchant SJ, Kong W, Mahmud A, Booth CM, Hanna TP. Palliative Radiotherapy for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: Population-Based Patterns of Utilization and Outcomes in Ontario, Canada. J Palliat Care 2023; 38:157-166. [PMID: 35043749 PMCID: PMC10026159 DOI: 10.1177/08258597211072946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer may develop local symptoms for which palliative radiotherapy (PRT) may be considered. We sought to evaluate patterns in utilization and outcomes of patients receiving PRT for incurable esophageal and gastric cancer in Ontario, Canada using health administrative data. METHODS Linked health administrative databases were used to identify patients receiving PRT for incurable esophageal and gastric cancer. Primary outcomes were utilization and delivery of PRT, utilization of endoscopic dilation with or without stent insertion after completion of PRT and survival from 1) date of diagnosis and 2) start of PRT. RESULTS We identified 2500 patients who received PRT. Mean age was 70 ± 13 years and the majority (75%, n = 1873/2500) were male. Over half of the patients had a diagnosis of gastric cancer (58%, n = 1453/2500) and began PRT within 6 months of cancer diagnosis (85%, n = 2125/2500). Of the 2500 patients in the cohort, 2174 patients received EBRT with few receiving brachytherapy (n = 326) or EBRT and brachytherapy combined (n = 88). Over the study period, there was an increase in the number of patients receiving PRT (136 in 2007 to 290 in 2016), as well as in the use of advanced conformal radiotherapy techniques. Only 5% (115/2500) required dilation with or without stent insertion after completion of PRT. Median overall and cancer-specific survival of the cohort was 205 days and 209 days from date of diagnosis and 108 days and 110 days from start of PRT. CONCLUSIONS PRT is an important treatment for patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer who present with local symptoms. Utilization of PRT and advanced EBRT techniques increased over the study period. Few patients require endoscopic dilation with or without stent insertion after completion of PRT suggesting that PRT provides favorable symptom control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaila J Merchant
- Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Weidong Kong
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy P Hanna
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pituskin E, Sneath S, Rabel H, O'Rourke T, Duggleby W, Hunter K, Ghosh S, Fairchild A. Addressing Pain Associated with Bone Metastases: Oncology Nursing Roles in a Multidisciplinary Rapid-Access Palliative Radiotherapy Clinic. Semin Oncol Nurs 2022; 38:151279. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
5
|
Multidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:76-83. [PMID: 35620018 PMCID: PMC9127274 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence is emerging for new paradigms in the management of non-spine bone metastases. Consensus was feasible amongst physicians in both academic and community-based practice settings. Topics deemed of highest importance for consensus included referral for surgical stabilization and approach to peri-operative radiation, preferred radiation fractionation and appropriate use of stereotactic techniques, and clinical scenarios classified as potentially “complex” warranting multidisciplinary discussion.
Purpose Methods and Materials Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
6
|
Santos PMG, Mathis NJ, Lapen K, Lobaugh S, Yerramilli D, Bekelman JE, Gillespie EF. Assessment of Guideline-Nonconcordant Radiotherapy in Medicare Beneficiaries With Metastatic Cancer Near the End of Life, 2015-2017. JAMA HEALTH FORUM 2022; 3:e214468. [PMID: 35977234 PMCID: PMC8903107 DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Mae G. Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Noah J. Mathis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaitlyn Lapen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephanie Lobaugh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Divya Yerramilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Justin E. Bekelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Erin F. Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gouveia AG, Chan DCW, Hoskin PJ, Marta GN, Trippa F, Maranzano E, Chow E, Silva MF. Advances in radiotherapy in bone metastases in the context of new target therapies and ablative alternatives: A critical review. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:55-67. [PMID: 34333087 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
In patients with bone metastases (BM), radiotherapy (RT) is used to alleviate symptoms, reduce the risk of fracture, and improve quality of life (QoL). However, with the emergence of concepts like oligometastases, minimal invasive surgery, ablative therapies such as stereotactic ablative RT (SABR), radiosurgery (SRS), thermal ablation, and new systemic anticancer therapies, there have been a paradigm shift in the multidisciplinary approach to BM with the aim of preserving mobility and function survival. Despite guidelines on using single-dose RT in uncomplicated BM, its use remains relatively low. In uncomplicated BM, single-fraction RT produces similar overall and complete response rates to RT with multiple fractions, although it is associated with a higher retreatment rate of 20% versus 8%. Complicated BM can be characterised as the presence of impending or existing pathologic fracture, a major soft tissue component, existing spinal cord or cauda equina compression and neuropathic pain. The rate of complicated BM is around 35%. Unfortunately, there is a lack of prospective trials on RT in complicated BM and the best dose/fractionation regimen is not yet established. There are contradictory outcomes in studies reporting BM pain control rates and time to pain reduction when comparing SABR with Conventional RT. While some studies showed that SABR produces a faster reduction in pain and higher pain control rates than conventional RT, other studies did not show differences. Moreover, the local control rate for BM treated with SABR is higher than 80% in most studies, and the rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity is very low. The use of SABR may be preferred in three circumstances: reirradiation, oligometastatic disease, and radioresistant tumours. Local ablative therapies like SABR can delay change or use of systemic therapy, preserve patients' Qol, and improve disease-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, despite the potential benefit of SABR in oligometastatic disease, there is a need to establish the optial indication, RT dose fractionation, prognostic factors and optimal timing in combination with systemic therapies for SABR. This review evaluates the role of RT in BM considering these recent treatment advances. We consider the definition of complicated BM, use of single and multiple fractions RT for both complicated and uncomplicated BM, reirradiation, new treatment paradigms including local ablative treatments, oligometastatic disease, systemic therapy, physical activity and rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André G Gouveia
- Radiation Oncology Department, Américas Centro de Oncologia Integrado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
| | - Dominic C W Chan
- Department of Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Peter J Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom; Radiation Oncology Department, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gustavo N Marta
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabio Trippa
- Radiation Oncology Center, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | | - Edward Chow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Mauricio F Silva
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Federal University, Santa Maria, Brazil; Clínica de Radioterapia de Santa Maria, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|